Compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave and hyperbaric oxygen therapy on enhancing wound healing in a streptozotocin‐induced diabetic rodent model

Studies have revealed that both extracorporeal shock‐wave therapy (ESWT) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can accelerate wound healing. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and HBOT in enhancing diabetic wound healing. A dorsal skin defect in a streptozotocin‐induced diabetes ro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences Vol. 39; no. 11; pp. 1135 - 1144
Main Authors Chen, Rong‐Fu, Lin, Yun‐Nan, Liu, Keng‐Fan, Lee, Chia‐Chun, Hu, Chieh‐Ju, Wang, Chun‐Ting, Wang, Ching‐Jen, Kuo, Yur‐Ren
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China (Republic : 1949- ) John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2023
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Studies have revealed that both extracorporeal shock‐wave therapy (ESWT) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can accelerate wound healing. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and HBOT in enhancing diabetic wound healing. A dorsal skin defect in a streptozotocin‐induced diabetes rodent model was used. Postoperative wound healing was assessed once every 3 days. Histologic examination was performed with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Proliferation marker protein Ki‐67 (Ki‐67), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and 8‐hydroxy‐2‐deoxyguanosine (8‐OHdG) were evaluated with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The wound area was significantly reduced in the ESWT and HBOT groups compared to that in the diabetic controls. However, the wound healing time was significantly increased in the HBOT group compared to the ESWT group. Histological findings showed a statistical increase in neovascularization and suppression of the inflammatory response by both HBOT and ESWT compared to the controls. IHC staining revealed a significant increase in Ki‐67, VEGF, and eNOS but suppressed 8‐OHdG expression in the ESWT group compared to the HBOT group. ESWT facilitated diabetic wound healing more effectively than HBOT by suppressing the inflammatory response and enhancing cellular proliferation and neovascularization and tissue regeneration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Rong‐Fu Chen and Yun‐Nan Lin have equal contributions as co‐first authors.
ISSN:1607-551X
2410-8650
2410-8650
DOI:10.1002/kjm2.12746