Drawing parallels in human–other interactions: a trans-disciplinary approach to developing human–robot interaction methodologies
This opinion paper discusses how human–robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that explore human–other interactions. The paper presents a framework that draws parallels between HRIs, and human–human, human–animal and human–ob...
Saved in:
Published in | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 374; no. 1771; p. 20180433 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
The Royal Society
29.04.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This opinion paper discusses how human–robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that explore human–other interactions. The paper presents a framework that draws parallels between HRIs, and human–human, human–animal and human–object interaction literature, by considering the morphology and use of a robot to aid the development of robust HRI methodologies. The paper then briefly presents some novel empirical work as proof of concept to exemplify how the framework can help researchers define the mechanism of effect taking place within specific HRIs. The empirical work draws on known mechanisms of effect in animal-assisted therapy, and behavioural observations of touch patterns and their relation to individual differences in caring and attachment styles, and details how this trans-disciplinary approach to HRI methodology development was used to explore how an interaction with an animal-like robot was impacting a user. In doing so, this opinion piece outlines how useful objective, psychological measures of social cognition can be for deepening our understanding of HRI, and developing richer HRI methodologies, which take us away from questions that simply ask ‘Is this a good robot?’, and closer towards questions that ask ‘What mechanism of effect is occurring here, through which effective HRI is being performed?’ This paper further proposes that in using trans-disciplinary methodologies, experimental HRI can also be used to study human social cognition in and of itself.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human–robot interaction’. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This opinion paper discusses how human-robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that explore human-other interactions. The paper presents a framework that draws parallels between HRIs, and human-human, human-animal and human-object interaction literature, by considering the morphology and use of a robot to aid the development of robust HRI methodologies. The paper then briefly presents some novel empirical work as proof of concept to exemplify how the framework can help researchers define the mechanism of effect taking place within specific HRIs. The empirical work draws on known mechanisms of effect in animal-assisted therapy, and behavioural observations of touch patterns and their relation to individual differences in caring and attachment styles, and details how this trans-disciplinary approach to HRI methodology development was used to explore how an interaction with an animal-like robot was impacting a user. In doing so, this opinion piece outlines how useful objective, psychological measures of social cognition can be for deepening our understanding of HRI, and developing richer HRI methodologies, which take us away from questions that simply ask 'Is this a good robot?', and closer towards questions that ask 'What mechanism of effect is occurring here, through which effective HRI is being performed?' This paper further proposes that in using trans-disciplinary methodologies, experimental HRI can also be used to study human social cognition in and of itself. This article is part of the theme issue 'From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction'.This opinion paper discusses how human-robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that explore human-other interactions. The paper presents a framework that draws parallels between HRIs, and human-human, human-animal and human-object interaction literature, by considering the morphology and use of a robot to aid the development of robust HRI methodologies. The paper then briefly presents some novel empirical work as proof of concept to exemplify how the framework can help researchers define the mechanism of effect taking place within specific HRIs. The empirical work draws on known mechanisms of effect in animal-assisted therapy, and behavioural observations of touch patterns and their relation to individual differences in caring and attachment styles, and details how this trans-disciplinary approach to HRI methodology development was used to explore how an interaction with an animal-like robot was impacting a user. In doing so, this opinion piece outlines how useful objective, psychological measures of social cognition can be for deepening our understanding of HRI, and developing richer HRI methodologies, which take us away from questions that simply ask 'Is this a good robot?', and closer towards questions that ask 'What mechanism of effect is occurring here, through which effective HRI is being performed?' This paper further proposes that in using trans-disciplinary methodologies, experimental HRI can also be used to study human social cognition in and of itself. This article is part of the theme issue 'From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction'. This opinion paper discusses how human–robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that explore human–other interactions. The paper presents a framework that draws parallels between HRIs, and human–human, human–animal and human–object interaction literature, by considering the morphology and use of a robot to aid the development of robust HRI methodologies. The paper then briefly presents some novel empirical work as proof of concept to exemplify how the framework can help researchers define the mechanism of effect taking place within specific HRIs. The empirical work draws on known mechanisms of effect in animal-assisted therapy, and behavioural observations of touch patterns and their relation to individual differences in caring and attachment styles, and details how this trans-disciplinary approach to HRI methodology development was used to explore how an interaction with an animal-like robot was impacting a user. In doing so, this opinion piece outlines how useful objective, psychological measures of social cognition can be for deepening our understanding of HRI, and developing richer HRI methodologies, which take us away from questions that simply ask ‘Is this a good robot?’, and closer towards questions that ask ‘What mechanism of effect is occurring here, through which effective HRI is being performed?’ This paper further proposes that in using trans-disciplinary methodologies, experimental HRI can also be used to study human social cognition in and of itself. This article is part of the theme issue ‘From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human–robot interaction’. This opinion paper discusses how human-robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that explore human-other interactions. The paper presents a framework that draws parallels between HRIs, and human-human, human-animal and human-object interaction literature, by considering the morphology and use of a robot to aid the development of robust HRI methodologies. The paper then briefly presents some novel empirical work as proof of concept to exemplify how the framework can help researchers define the mechanism of effect taking place within specific HRIs. The empirical work draws on known mechanisms of effect in animal-assisted therapy, and behavioural observations of touch patterns and their relation to individual differences in caring and attachment styles, and details how this trans-disciplinary approach to HRI methodology development was used to explore how an interaction with an animal-like robot was impacting a user. In doing so, this opinion piece outlines how useful objective, psychological measures of social cognition can be for deepening our understanding of HRI, and developing richer HRI methodologies, which take us away from questions that simply ask 'Is this a good robot?', and closer towards questions that ask 'What mechanism of effect is occurring here, through which effective HRI is being performed?' This paper further proposes that in using trans-disciplinary methodologies, experimental HRI can also be used to study human social cognition in and of itself. This article is part of the theme issue 'From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction'. |
Author | Collins, Emily C. |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Computer Science, The University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Computer Science, The University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Emily C. orcidid: 0000-0001-9396-536X surname: Collins fullname: Collins, Emily C. organization: Department of Computer Science, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30853002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1UcuKFDEUDTLi9LRuXUot3VR786hKxYUg4xMG3Og6pJJ0VySVlEl6xJ0L_8A_9EtMMdMyCq4CN-fBOecCnYUYLEKPMewwiOFZymXcEcDDDhil99AGM45bIjicoQ2InrQDo_05usj5MwCIjrMH6JzC0FEAskE_XiX11YVDs6ikvLc-Ny4003FW4df3n7FMNtVDsUnp4mLIzxvVlKRCbo3L2i3eBZW-NWpZUlR6akpsjL22Pi6r6EknxTGWuzrNbMsUTfTx4Gx-iO7vlc_20e27RZ_evP54-a69-vD2_eXLq1Z3VJR25D0nigoqRsYFBU0UHoXqODfQd6yzhtq-M6ANr9lUv-fDYGAPlqqea9PRLXpxo7scx9kabUON4uWS3FxDyKic_PsnuEke4rXsWUdI7XeLnt4KpPjlaHORc23Beq-CjccsCRaA8YAZq9And73-mJyqrwB2A9Ap5pzsXmpX1FpOtXZeYpDrwnJdWK4Ly3XhStv9Qzsp_4fwG9-wr3Q |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_021_00767_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tins_2020_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2018_0024 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_561510 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_023_01024_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2020_11_009 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbot_2022_883106 crossref_primary_10_3390_info15080460 crossref_primary_10_3390_computers11120181 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2022_110231 |
Cites_doi | 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.327 10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.488 10.1007/978-3-642-19385-9_15 10.5772/5702 10.1145/2157689.2157769 10.1097/00002800-199507000-00005 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864 10.1016/B978-012369484-3/50003-7 10.1126/science.1145463 10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.478 10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314415 10.1111/jan.12348 10.2752/089279307X224773 10.1177/0146167211436117 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.02.008 10.1109/TRO.2007.906261 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.017 10.1097/00003465-200019030-00006 10.1109/IROS.2018.8594441 10.1086/200975 10.1080/03637759609376395 10.1109/ARSO.2012.6213399 10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 10.1080/00223890701268041 10.1037/12061-004 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00009-2 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.007 10.1037/12061-000 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 The Authors. 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 The Authors. 2019 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2018.0433 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Sciences (General) Biology |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Drawing Parallels |
EISSN | 1471-2970 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC6452243 30853002 10_1098_rstb_2018_0433 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; grantid: EP/R026084/1 |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X 0R~ 29O 2WC 4.4 53G AACGO AANCE AAYXX ABBHK ABPLY ABTLG ABXSQ ACHIC ACPRK ACSFO ADBBV ADQXQ AEUPB AEXZC AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AQVQM BAWUL BTFSW CITATION DCCCD DIK E3Z EBS EJD F5P GX1 H13 HYE HZ~ IPSME JAAYA JBMMH JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSG JST KQ8 MRS MV1 NSAHA O9- OK1 RPM RRY SA0 TN5 V1E W8F YNT ~02 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-b7672a3939b47930c2a1b9a577d06545ed3e65d0cd7002a6f788d0f0e3a67cd53 |
ISSN | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:42:49 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 20:44:15 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:59:13 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:25:28 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:09 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1771 |
Keywords | trans-disciplinary animal-assisted therapy touch caring attachment human–robot interaction methodology |
Language | English |
License | Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c539t-b7672a3939b47930c2a1b9a577d06545ed3e65d0cd7002a6f788d0f0e3a67cd53 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 One contribution of 17 to a theme issue ‘From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human–robot interaction’. |
ORCID | 0000-0001-9396-536X |
OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6452243 |
PMID | 30853002 |
PQID | 2190118144 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6452243 proquest_miscellaneous_2190118144 pubmed_primary_30853002 crossref_citationtrail_10_1098_rstb_2018_0433 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2018_0433 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-04-29 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-04-29 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2019 text: 2019-04-29 day: 29 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | The Royal Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Royal Society |
References | e_1_3_6_30_2 e_1_3_6_31_2 e_1_3_6_32_2 e_1_3_6_10_2 Shaver PR (e_1_3_6_41_2) 2010 Hall ET (e_1_3_6_15_2) 1966 Kang M (e_1_3_6_4_2) 2011 Goldberg LR (e_1_3_6_17_2) 1999; 7 e_1_3_6_19_2 Lambert D (e_1_3_6_12_2) 2004 e_1_3_6_14_2 e_1_3_6_37_2 e_1_3_6_13_2 e_1_3_6_38_2 e_1_3_6_39_2 e_1_3_6_11_2 e_1_3_6_18_2 e_1_3_6_33_2 e_1_3_6_34_2 e_1_3_6_16_2 e_1_3_6_35_2 e_1_3_6_36_2 e_1_3_6_40_2 e_1_3_6_20_2 e_1_3_6_21_2 e_1_3_6_5_2 e_1_3_6_3_2 e_1_3_6_2_2 e_1_3_6_9_2 e_1_3_6_8_2 e_1_3_6_7_2 e_1_3_6_6_2 e_1_3_6_26_2 e_1_3_6_27_2 e_1_3_6_28_2 e_1_3_6_29_2 e_1_3_6_22_2 e_1_3_6_23_2 e_1_3_6_24_2 e_1_3_6_25_2 |
References_xml | – ident: e_1_3_6_9_2 – volume-title: The hidden dimension year: 1966 ident: e_1_3_6_15_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_34_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_31_2 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.327 – ident: e_1_3_6_23_2 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.488 – ident: e_1_3_6_18_2 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19385-9_15 – ident: e_1_3_6_8_2 doi: 10.5772/5702 – ident: e_1_3_6_14_2 doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157769 – ident: e_1_3_6_32_2 doi: 10.1097/00002800-199507000-00005 – ident: e_1_3_6_7_2 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864 – ident: e_1_3_6_11_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_22_2 doi: 10.1016/B978-012369484-3/50003-7 – ident: e_1_3_6_6_2 doi: 10.1126/science.1145463 – ident: e_1_3_6_29_2 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.478 – ident: e_1_3_6_16_2 doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314415 – volume: 7 start-page: 7 year: 1999 ident: e_1_3_6_17_2 article-title: A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models publication-title: Pers. Psychol. Europe – ident: e_1_3_6_28_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_36_2 doi: 10.1111/jan.12348 – ident: e_1_3_6_24_2 doi: 10.2752/089279307X224773 – ident: e_1_3_6_30_2 doi: 10.1177/0146167211436117 – ident: e_1_3_6_25_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.02.008 – ident: e_1_3_6_19_2 doi: 10.1109/TRO.2007.906261 – ident: e_1_3_6_35_2 doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.017 – ident: e_1_3_6_21_2 – volume-title: Sublime dreams of living machines year: 2011 ident: e_1_3_6_4_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_38_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_33_2 doi: 10.1097/00003465-200019030-00006 – ident: e_1_3_6_3_2 doi: 10.1109/IROS.2018.8594441 – ident: e_1_3_6_13_2 doi: 10.1086/200975 – ident: e_1_3_6_37_2 doi: 10.1080/03637759609376395 – ident: e_1_3_6_5_2 doi: 10.1109/ARSO.2012.6213399 – ident: e_1_3_6_2_2 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 – volume-title: Body language year: 2004 ident: e_1_3_6_12_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_26_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_40_2 doi: 10.1080/00223890701268041 – start-page: 73 volume-title: Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: the better angels of our nature year: 2010 ident: e_1_3_6_41_2 doi: 10.1037/12061-004 – ident: e_1_3_6_20_2 – ident: e_1_3_6_10_2 doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00009-2 – ident: e_1_3_6_27_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.007 – ident: e_1_3_6_39_2 doi: 10.1037/12061-000 |
SSID | ssj0009574 |
Score | 2.368638 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | This opinion paper discusses how human–robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that... This opinion paper discusses how human-robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 20180433 |
SubjectTerms | Humans Interpersonal Relations Opinion Piece Robotics - methods Social Behavior |
Title | Drawing parallels in human–other interactions: a trans-disciplinary approach to developing human–robot interaction methodologies |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30853002 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2190118144 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6452243 |
Volume | 374 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9QwFA7jiuKLuONtvBFBUJF220nStL7pqCzKisIu7FtJmg4uLO3S6bDokw_-A3-Lf8hf4smtl50VVl-GoZNmppxvzjlJzvk-hJ6kkNJSWZZBTJgMKCy-grRQUQDRgmQklXJpJFn2Pia7B_T9ITucTH4NqpbWrQyLb-f2lfyPVeEa2FV3yf6DZbtJ4QK8B_vCK1gYXi9k4zeNODXd5KLRkijHprbVqO75GgZiGqwMKURjWxhWtr251TEqGPXkenpxnY4OeqnG8zW1rNvhfE6D2vhQV4_oct1PXiXB4KDthclXvjDB7l34wlF9WmHERULtwWCyF69Dp5XZ924Wfc3jwvCJ23YKs0uzCId7GLE5jnEbHW4zMgGMUOJIsa0rhrAJg6ysiPfVxEr6eFByK9_ina8mI6OWV2MjMkSZ7naAjFrqer409APHFNxnQmNXsGiP6tNc35_r-3N9_yV0eQ6rEy2c8eFzOuB6tuTf_qE6rtB0Z_z941xoY4Fztk53kPjs30DX3YoFv7Lw20aTspqiK9YuX6fo6p6rzpiibRcoVviZYzN_fhP9cCDFHUjxUYUNqH5__2ngiYfwfIkF3gQn9uDEbY17cHbzGFgO58EjWN5CB-_e7i92Ayf9ERSMZG0gecLnArxFJvXWb1TMRSwzwThXuhualYqUCVNRoTiEdJEseZqqaBmVRCS8UIzcRltVXZV3EWaR4gLSMJnEgkLEEiqhMc2UKljG2FLNUOCNkBeOF1_Lsxzn5xt9hp52408sI8xfRz72Ns3BaeuTOFGV9XqVz2Pb8U3pDN2xNu7mIrAIIvBQM8RH1u8GaEL48SfV0RdDDK-LFMDH3rvwL7yPrvV_xwdoq23W5UNIslv5yED6D4Yg2e8 |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drawing+parallels+in+human%E2%80%93other+interactions%3A+a+trans-disciplinary+approach+to+developing+human%E2%80%93robot+interaction+methodologies&rft.jtitle=Philosophical+transactions+of+the+Royal+Society+of+London.+Series+B.+Biological+sciences&rft.au=Collins%2C+Emily+C.&rft.date=2019-04-29&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft.volume=374&rft.issue=1771&rft.spage=20180433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098%2Frstb.2018.0433&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1098_rstb_2018_0433 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0962-8436&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0962-8436&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0962-8436&client=summon |