Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner
We evaluated the performance of an Inveon preclinical PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions), the latest MicroPET system. Spatial resolution was measured with a glass capillary tube (0.26 mm inside diameter, 0.29 mm wall thickness) filled with (18)F solution. Transaxial and axial resolutions were m...
Saved in:
Published in | Physics in medicine & biology Vol. 54; no. 9; pp. 2885 - 2899 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
IOP Publishing
07.05.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0031-9155 1361-6560 |
DOI | 10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/020 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | We evaluated the performance of an Inveon preclinical PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions), the latest MicroPET system. Spatial resolution was measured with a glass capillary tube (0.26 mm inside diameter, 0.29 mm wall thickness) filled with (18)F solution. Transaxial and axial resolutions were measured with the source placed parallel and perpendicular to the axis of the scanner. The sensitivity of the scanner was measured with a (22)Na point source, placed on the animal bed and positioned at different offsets from the center of the field of view (FOV), as well as at different energy and coincidence windows. The noise equivalent count rates (NECR) and the system scatter fraction were measured using rat-like (Phi = 60, L = 150 mm) and mouse-like (Phi = 25 mm, L = 70 mm) cylindrical phantoms. Line sources filled with high activity (18)F (>250 MBq) were inserted parallel to the axes of the phantoms (13.5 and 10 mm offset). For each phantom, list-mode data were collected over 24 h at 350-650 keV and 250-750 keV energy windows and 3.4 ns coincidence window. System scatter fraction was measured when the random event rates were below 1%. Performance phantoms consisting of cylinders with hot rod inserts filled with (18)F were imaged. In addition, we performed imaging studies that show the suitability of the Inveon scanner for imaging small structures such as those in mice with a variety of tracers. The radial, tangential and axial resolutions at the center of FOV were 1.46 mm, 1.49 and 1.15 mm, respectively. At a radial offset of 2 cm, the FWHM values were 1.73, 2.20 and 1.47 mm, respectively. At a coincidence window of 3.4 ns, the sensitivity was 5.75% for EW = 350-650 keV and 7.4% for EW = 250-750 keV. For an energy window of 350-650 keV, the peak NECR was 538 kcps at 131.4 MBq for the rat-like phantom, and 1734 kcps at 147.4 MBq for the mouse-like phantom. The system scatter fraction values were 0.22 for the rat phantom and 0.06 for the mouse phantom. The Inveon system presents high image resolution, low scatter fraction values and improved sensitivity and count rate performance. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We evaluated the performance of an Inveon preclinical PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions), the latest MicroPET system. Spatial resolution was measured with a glass capillary tube (0.26 mm inside diameter, 0.29 mm wall thickness) filled with
18
F solution. Transaxial and axial resolutions were measured with the source placed parallel and perpendicular to the axis of the scanner. The sensitivity of the scanner was measured with a
22
Na point source, placed on the animal bed and positioned at different offsets from the center of the field of view (FOV), as well as at different energy and coincidence windows. The noise equivalent count rates (NECR) and the system scatter fraction were measured using rat-like (Φ = 60,
L
= 150 mm) and mouse-like (Φ = 25 mm,
L
= 70 mm) cylindrical phantoms. Line sources filled with high activity
18
F (>250 MBq) were inserted parallel to the axes of the phantoms (13.5 and 10 mm offset). For each phantom, list-mode data were collected over 24 h at 350–650 keV and 250–750 keV energy windows and 3.4 ns coincidence window. System scatter fraction was measured when the random event rates were below 1%. Performance phantoms consisting of cylinders with hot rod inserts filled with
18
F were imaged. In addition, we performed imaging studies that show the suitability of the Inveon scanner for imaging small structures such as those in mice with a variety of tracers. The radial, tangential and axial resolutions at the center of FOV were 1.46 mm, 1.49 and 1.15 mm, respectively. At a radial offset of 2 cm, the FWHM values were 1.73, 2.20 and 1.47 mm, respectively. At a coincidence window of 3.4 ns, the sensitivity was 5.75% for EW = 350–650 keV and 7.4% for EW = 250–750 keV. For an energy window of 350–650 keV, the peak NECR was 538 kcps at 131.4 MBq for the rat-like phantom, and 1734 kcps at 147.4 MBq for the mouse-like phantom. The system scatter fraction values were 0.22 for the rat phantom and 0.06 for the mouse phantom. The Inveon system presents high image resolution, low scatter fraction values and improved sensitivity and count rate performance. We evaluated the performance of an Inveon preclinical PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions), the latest MicroPET system. Spatial resolution was measured with a glass capillary tube (0.26 mm inside diameter, 0.29 mm wall thickness) filled with (18)F solution. Transaxial and axial resolutions were measured with the source placed parallel and perpendicular to the axis of the scanner. The sensitivity of the scanner was measured with a (22)Na point source, placed on the animal bed and positioned at different offsets from the center of the field of view (FOV), as well as at different energy and coincidence windows. The noise equivalent count rates (NECR) and the system scatter fraction were measured using rat-like (Phi = 60, L = 150 mm) and mouse-like (Phi = 25 mm, L = 70 mm) cylindrical phantoms. Line sources filled with high activity (18)F (>250 MBq) were inserted parallel to the axes of the phantoms (13.5 and 10 mm offset). For each phantom, list-mode data were collected over 24 h at 350-650 keV and 250-750 keV energy windows and 3.4 ns coincidence window. System scatter fraction was measured when the random event rates were below 1%. Performance phantoms consisting of cylinders with hot rod inserts filled with (18)F were imaged. In addition, we performed imaging studies that show the suitability of the Inveon scanner for imaging small structures such as those in mice with a variety of tracers. The radial, tangential and axial resolutions at the center of FOV were 1.46 mm, 1.49 and 1.15 mm, respectively. At a radial offset of 2 cm, the FWHM values were 1.73, 2.20 and 1.47 mm, respectively. At a coincidence window of 3.4 ns, the sensitivity was 5.75% for EW = 350-650 keV and 7.4% for EW = 250-750 keV. For an energy window of 350-650 keV, the peak NECR was 538 kcps at 131.4 MBq for the rat-like phantom, and 1734 kcps at 147.4 MBq for the mouse-like phantom. The system scatter fraction values were 0.22 for the rat phantom and 0.06 for the mouse phantom. The Inveon system presents high image resolution, low scatter fraction values and improved sensitivity and count rate performance.We evaluated the performance of an Inveon preclinical PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions), the latest MicroPET system. Spatial resolution was measured with a glass capillary tube (0.26 mm inside diameter, 0.29 mm wall thickness) filled with (18)F solution. Transaxial and axial resolutions were measured with the source placed parallel and perpendicular to the axis of the scanner. The sensitivity of the scanner was measured with a (22)Na point source, placed on the animal bed and positioned at different offsets from the center of the field of view (FOV), as well as at different energy and coincidence windows. The noise equivalent count rates (NECR) and the system scatter fraction were measured using rat-like (Phi = 60, L = 150 mm) and mouse-like (Phi = 25 mm, L = 70 mm) cylindrical phantoms. Line sources filled with high activity (18)F (>250 MBq) were inserted parallel to the axes of the phantoms (13.5 and 10 mm offset). For each phantom, list-mode data were collected over 24 h at 350-650 keV and 250-750 keV energy windows and 3.4 ns coincidence window. System scatter fraction was measured when the random event rates were below 1%. Performance phantoms consisting of cylinders with hot rod inserts filled with (18)F were imaged. In addition, we performed imaging studies that show the suitability of the Inveon scanner for imaging small structures such as those in mice with a variety of tracers. The radial, tangential and axial resolutions at the center of FOV were 1.46 mm, 1.49 and 1.15 mm, respectively. At a radial offset of 2 cm, the FWHM values were 1.73, 2.20 and 1.47 mm, respectively. At a coincidence window of 3.4 ns, the sensitivity was 5.75% for EW = 350-650 keV and 7.4% for EW = 250-750 keV. For an energy window of 350-650 keV, the peak NECR was 538 kcps at 131.4 MBq for the rat-like phantom, and 1734 kcps at 147.4 MBq for the mouse-like phantom. The system scatter fraction values were 0.22 for the rat phantom and 0.06 for the mouse phantom. The Inveon system presents high image resolution, low scatter fraction values and improved sensitivity and count rate performance. We evaluated the performance of an Inveon preclinical PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions), the latest MicroPET system. Spatial resolution was measured with a glass capillary tube (0.26 mm inside diameter, 0.29 mm wall thickness) filled with (18)F solution. Transaxial and axial resolutions were measured with the source placed parallel and perpendicular to the axis of the scanner. The sensitivity of the scanner was measured with a (22)Na point source, placed on the animal bed and positioned at different offsets from the center of the field of view (FOV), as well as at different energy and coincidence windows. The noise equivalent count rates (NECR) and the system scatter fraction were measured using rat-like (Phi = 60, L = 150 mm) and mouse-like (Phi = 25 mm, L = 70 mm) cylindrical phantoms. Line sources filled with high activity (18)F (>250 MBq) were inserted parallel to the axes of the phantoms (13.5 and 10 mm offset). For each phantom, list-mode data were collected over 24 h at 350-650 keV and 250-750 keV energy windows and 3.4 ns coincidence window. System scatter fraction was measured when the random event rates were below 1%. Performance phantoms consisting of cylinders with hot rod inserts filled with (18)F were imaged. In addition, we performed imaging studies that show the suitability of the Inveon scanner for imaging small structures such as those in mice with a variety of tracers. The radial, tangential and axial resolutions at the center of FOV were 1.46 mm, 1.49 and 1.15 mm, respectively. At a radial offset of 2 cm, the FWHM values were 1.73, 2.20 and 1.47 mm, respectively. At a coincidence window of 3.4 ns, the sensitivity was 5.75% for EW = 350-650 keV and 7.4% for EW = 250-750 keV. For an energy window of 350-650 keV, the peak NECR was 538 kcps at 131.4 MBq for the rat-like phantom, and 1734 kcps at 147.4 MBq for the mouse-like phantom. The system scatter fraction values were 0.22 for the rat phantom and 0.06 for the mouse phantom. The Inveon system presents high image resolution, low scatter fraction values and improved sensitivity and count rate performance. |
Author | Constantinescu, Cristian C Mukherjee, Jogeshwar |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Constantinescu, Cristian C – sequence: 2 fullname: Mukherjee, Jogeshwar |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkUtLAzEUhYMoWh9_wIXMSnAx9mbymARBkOILBF3oOqRpopFpMibTgv_eqfUtiKtLuN85J5y7iVZDDBahXQyHGIQYAhBcSszYkNGhHEIFK2iACcclZxxW0eAD2ECbOT8CYCwquo42sCSCAogBOrqxycU01cHYws51M9Odj6GIrtChuAxz2z9uTm-LNlnT-OCNbopsdAg2baM1p5tsd97mFro7O70dXZRX1-eXo5Or0jAiutJJSYBbW1HCgYzBacyknNRywg0WtDZaMqOpc444BmNTYUNYTaHCxFGOa7KFjpe-7Ww8tRNjQ5d0o9rkpzo9q6i9-r4J_kHdx7mqBBE1Xxjsvxmk-DSzuVNTn41tGh1snGXFa0wlk6wH974mfUS899UD1RIwKeacrPtEQC2Oohadq0XnilElVX-UXiR-iIzvXmvuf-ubv6XlUupj-7-og9_8b061E0deADdTqmk |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ad4082 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_112_103507 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_115_167858 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab7502 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_115_160820 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2011_12_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2013_02_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nima_2010_02_073 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules26237360 crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_21698 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41388_019_0882_7 crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_3067123 crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_21617 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2009_2026647 crossref_primary_10_1002_wsbm_71 crossref_primary_10_1021_jm500416f crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_21572 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2015_09_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2024_120748 crossref_primary_10_1517_14712598_2016_1100162 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2011_07733_x crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_115_163493 crossref_primary_10_3938_jkps_74_1129 crossref_primary_10_1002_cne_24320 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2017_2664921 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_014_0892_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bmcl_2016_03_018 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_0221_6_08_P08012 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_112_106740 crossref_primary_10_1002_cne_23919 crossref_primary_10_2310_7290_2014_00005 crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_21867 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nima_2010_10_089 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_009_1352_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_2191_219X_1_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics11142194 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12194_016_0386_x crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm8040512 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_06_051 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_phpro_2012_04_105 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2011_09_026 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_112_114660 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2011_05_032 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_020_01512_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2011_02_040 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_110_086942 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_015_0906_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2013_01_028 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_110_086702 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_745064 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_010_1683_y crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_58_19_6749 crossref_primary_10_5812_iranjradiol_26806 crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_21950 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_017_1126_2 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2011_2160202 crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_20904 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_012_0577_8 crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2017_4283 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2014_05_143 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13550_018_0467_4 crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0b013e32833dc61d crossref_primary_10_1002_aic_16223 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_118_221994 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_0221_10_10_P10026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2012_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_0221_10_04_P04001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_018_1202_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2011_12_065 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0109113 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2015_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2014_06_003 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_111_088583 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2014_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0205044 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_59_13_3517 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2010_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_14729 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2013_12_017 crossref_primary_10_1186_2191_219X_1_30 crossref_primary_10_3390_app11010266 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneumeth_2013_01_018 crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_21530 crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_21893 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2010_2065240 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_aa881c crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_110_076125 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms19113684 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_legalmed_2015_02_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms25147890 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00429_018_1743_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_0271678X15613525 crossref_primary_10_1039_C8OB00499D crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_113_126318 crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0000000000000327 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0065286 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2025_121092 crossref_primary_10_1002_syn_21665 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4937784 crossref_primary_10_2478_pjmpe_2019_0013 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_123_266526 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2020_00529 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2011_2160998 crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_170115 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab63ef crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules27144552 crossref_primary_10_3390_s140814654 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_inorgchem_0c03492 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_17469 crossref_primary_10_2310_7290_2012_00042 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nima_2015_01_093 crossref_primary_10_2310_7290_2014_00037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpc_2023_109008 crossref_primary_10_1186_ar4670 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_61_5_N193 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2011_08_109 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_aaff73 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_55_14_011 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2012_2201958 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_113_121608 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2013_2294011 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_109_068858 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12350_019_01713_z crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_54781_z crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2021_676257 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_61_5_1904 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_0221_10_03_P03006 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2021_3079514 crossref_primary_10_1186_ar3176 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1475_097X_2010_00939_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2012_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab1614 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNS_2012_2205402 |
Cites_doi | 10.1109/42.774167 10.1109/42.563660 10.1109/NSSMIC.2006.354381 10.1088/0031-9155/46/7/308 10.1109/TNS.2006.889312 10.1038/sj.neo.7900083 10.1109/23.34585 10.1157/13079288 10.1088/0031-9155/48/4/302 10.1007/s00259-002-1052-6 10.2967/jnumed.107.040550 10.1007/BF02258426 10.2174/156802605774297056 10.1007/s00259-004-1683-x 10.1109/42.876305 10.1088/0031-9155/48/11/303 10.1055/s-0038-1623898 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/020 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Biology Physics |
EISSN | 1361-6560 |
EndPage | 2899 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC2838767 19384008 10_1088_0031_9155_54_9_020 |
Genre | Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: S10RR019269-01A2 – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS grantid: R01 EB006110-01A2 – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: S10 RR019269 – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS grantid: R01 EB006110 |
GroupedDBID | - 02O 123 1JI 1PV 1WK 4.4 5B3 5RE 5VS 5ZH 7.M 7.Q 8RP 9BW AAGCD AAJIO AALHV AAPBV ABFLS ABHWH ABPTK ABQJV ABUFD ACGFS ADCOW AEFHF AENEX AFYNE AHSEE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ASPBG ATQHT AVWKF AZFZN BBWZM CJUJL CS3 DU5 DZ EBS EDWGO EJD EMSAF EPQRW EQZZN F5P FEDTE HAK HVGLF IHE IOP IZVLO KNG KOT LAP M45 MGA N5L N9A NT- NT. P2P Q02 R4D RIN RNS RO9 ROL RPA RW3 S3P SY9 TN5 UCJ UNR W28 X XPP ZA5 --- -DZ -~X AAJKP AATNI AAYXX ABJNI ABLJU ABVAM ACAFW ACARI ACHIP ADEQX AERVB AGQPQ AKPSB AOAED ARNYC CITATION CRLBU IJHAN JCGBZ PJBAE CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 AEINN 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-f99306ee243603b0fa1599d79d6c1847ca95ca4fff3f50bc21c35740213f46173 |
IEDL.DBID | IOP |
ISSN | 0031-9155 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:22:54 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 10:43:48 EDT 2025 Fri May 30 11:02:00 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:24:49 EDT 2025 Mon May 13 15:47:06 EDT 2019 Tue Nov 10 14:16:59 EST 2020 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c538t-f99306ee243603b0fa1599d79d6c1847ca95ca4fff3f50bc21c35740213f46173 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/020 |
PMID | 19384008 |
PQID | 67149595 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_54_9_020 iop_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_54_9_020 proquest_miscellaneous_67149595 crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_0031_9155_54_9_020 pubmed_primary_19384008 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2838767 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2009-05-07 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-05-07 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2009 text: 2009-05-07 day: 07 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Physics in medicine & biology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Phys Med Biol |
PublicationYear | 2009 |
Publisher | IOP Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: IOP Publishing |
References | 23 Daube-Witherspoon M E (3) 1987; 28 National Electrical Manufacturers Association (12) 2008 24 14 Knoess C (8) 2003; 30 Seidel J Vaquero J J Lee I J Green M V (16) 2000 Vaquero J J (20) 2005; 24 National Electrical Manufacturers Association (11) 2007 1 Watson C C (22) 2004; 45 Boellaard R (2) 2003; 48 Tai Y C (18) 2003; 48 4 5 Tai Y C (19) 2005; 46 6 7 9 Tai Y C (17) 2001; 46 Mintzer R A Siegel S B (10) 2007 Schafers K P (15) 2003; 42 Newport D F (13) 2006 21 |
References_xml | – ident: 14 doi: 10.1109/42.774167 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1109/42.563660 – start-page: 2333 year: 2006 ident: 13 publication-title: IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. Conf. Record doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2006.354381 – year: 2008 ident: 12 – volume: 46 start-page: 1845 issn: 0031-9155 year: 2001 ident: 17 publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/7/308 – ident: 9 doi: 10.1109/TNS.2006.889312 – ident: 5 doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900083 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1109/23.34585 – volume: 24 start-page: 334 year: 2005 ident: 20 publication-title: Rev. Esp. Med. Nucl. doi: 10.1157/13079288 – volume: 28 start-page: 1717 issn: 0161-5505 year: 1987 ident: 3 publication-title: J. Nucl. Med. – volume: 48 start-page: 429 issn: 0031-9155 year: 2003 ident: 2 publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/4/302 – volume: 30 start-page: 737 year: 2003 ident: 8 publication-title: Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1052-6 – year: 2007 ident: 11 – ident: 6 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.040550 – volume: 45 start-page: 822 year: 2004 ident: 22 publication-title: J. Nucl. Med. – ident: 1 doi: 10.1007/BF02258426 – ident: 21 doi: 10.2174/156802605774297056 – ident: 23 doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1683-x – start-page: 3418 year: 2007 ident: 10 publication-title: IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. Conf. Record IEEE – ident: 24 doi: 10.1109/42.876305 – year: 2000 ident: 16 publication-title: IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. and Medical Imaging – volume: 48 start-page: 1519 issn: 0031-9155 year: 2003 ident: 18 publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/11/303 – volume: 42 start-page: 86 issn: 0029-5566 year: 2003 ident: 15 publication-title: Nuklearmedizin doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1623898 – volume: 46 start-page: 455 issn: 0161-5505 year: 2005 ident: 19 publication-title: J. Nucl. Med. |
SSID | ssj0011824 |
Score | 2.3500028 |
Snippet | We evaluated the performance of an Inveon preclinical PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions), the latest MicroPET system. Spatial resolution was measured with... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref iop |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 2885 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Mice Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Rats Scattering, Radiation Sensitivity and Specificity Universities |
Title | Performance evaluation of an Inveon PET preclinical scanner |
URI | http://iopscience.iop.org/0031-9155/54/9/020 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384008 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67149595 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2838767 |
Volume | 54 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3JTsMwEB0BEogLS9nKGiHEBaVNYzuuxQmhVoBU6AGk3qzEsUUFSiraHuDrGWfpAgj1lmXixM54_EbjeQNwwSiJQ8vZGgjCXGpsIXfeyMOFLGbKj2KbO9x5DO5e6EOP9ZagLCXXTweF5a_hYRbJt2rnWhbzOqN1UUd4gwYXF37rad0_dSchAwTKOeVyIV5kyOAs-qOJuVVoGV_1F8D8uU9yZuFpb0KnTN_J95u81cajqKa-frM5LtSnLdgoEKhzk6vMNizppAKreU3KzwqsdYpoO17Mtoeq4Q5cd6f5Bc6UINxJjRMmjuXqwJNu69kZoAEtci2dIf61RH_swku79Xx75xZlF1yF1m_kGoQsXqC1T0ngkcgzIUIeEXMRBwr9Qa5CwVRIjTHEMC9SfkMRxtEPbRBDERCRPVhJ0kQfgKNDzg2hfqzQK8M20aIFWiAq8lmkjN-sQqP8DVIVnOS2NMa7zGLjzWZGXSrtSElGpZA4UlW4mjwzyBk5_pU-x0GfCP4WkIPYVOFyVui_1s5KLZE4DW1sJUx0Oh7KgFtXU7Aq7Oc6M21NEHSiPewrn9OmiYAl-J6_k_RfM6JvhH44YPxw0c87gvU82MVcjx_DyuhjrE8QM42i02yufAPNOQbX |
linkProvider | IOP Publishing |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NTxsxEB0VKhAXKKFAWtqsEOJSbbJZ2-tYnFBLlNIm5AASN2vXawsE2kQkOcCvZ7x2EgIRqtRbPsaTeOy132hm3gAcMUry1HK2JoKwkBrbyJ03XbiQ5UzFWW5rh7u9pHNFz6_ZNJuwrIUZDP3RX8eXjijYmdAnxLVs-zFUiPdgg9GGaCDeaQxzswIfme1NZ2v4LvqzQALCZ0fE7Mf4upnlehbuphX8_WWw83X25IvrqL0F2XQiLgvlrj4ZZ3X19Irj8b9m-gk2PVgNTt2AbfigiwqsufaVjxVY7_rAPH5YZpKq0Q6c9OelCMGcSzwYmCAtAkvrgW_6Z5fBEM9aX5YZjHCBC_3wGa7aZ5c_O6Hv0BAqPCjHoUF0EyVax5QkEckikyI6EjkXeaLQdeQqFUyl1BhDDIsyFTcVYRxd1iYxFLET2YXVYlDofQh0yrkhNM4VOnCoEw-_RAsEUDHLlIlbVWhO10YqT19uu2jcyzKM3mqVLKfSWksyKoVEa1Xhx2zM0JF3vCt9iAsxE3wrINH4VTh-KfSettp060h8Ym0YJi30YDKSCbdeqWBV2HMbaa5NEPS3I5wrX9hiMwHLBb74TXF7U3KCI0pEg_Ev__r3arDe_9WWf3_3_nyFDRciY2HED2B1_DDR3xBpjbPv5bP0DKb1Fsg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance+evaluation+of+an+Inveon+PET+preclinical+scanner&rft.jtitle=Physics+in+medicine+%26+biology&rft.au=Constantinescu%2C+Cristian+C&rft.au=Mukherjee%2C+Jogeshwar&rft.date=2009-05-07&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2885&rft.epage=2899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F0031-9155%2F54%2F9%2F020&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19384008&rft.externalDocID=PMC2838767 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon |