Configurational landscape heterogeneity shapes functional community composition of grassland butterflies
Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition. W...
Saved in:
| Published in | The Journal of applied ecology Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 505 - 513 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Scientific Publications
01.04.2015
John Wiley & Sons Ltd Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition. We examined how independent gradients of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, at eight spatial scales, shape taxonomic and functional composition of butterfly communities in 91 managed grasslands across Germany. We used landscape metrics that were calculated from functional maps based on habitat preferences of individual species during different life stages. The relative effects of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity were compared with those of local land‐use intensity on butterfly taxonomic diversity, community composition and functional diversity of traits related to body size, feeding breadth and migratory tendency. As expected, compositional heterogeneity had strong positive effects on taxonomic diversity, while configurational heterogeneity had strong positive effects on trait dominance within the community. When landscapes had smaller mean patch size and greater boundary area, communities were dominated by species with more specialized larval feeding, decreased forewing length and limited migratory tendency. The positive effects of increased configurational landscape heterogeneity outweighed the negative effects of local land‐use intensity on larval‐feeding specialization, at all spatial scales, highlighting its importance for specialists of all dispersal capabilities. Synthesis and applications. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250–1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition.
We examined how independent gradients of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, at eight spatial scales, shape taxonomic and functional composition of butterfly communities in 91 managed grasslands across Germany. We used landscape metrics that were calculated from functional maps based on habitat preferences of individual species during different life stages. The relative effects of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity were compared with those of local land‐use intensity on butterfly taxonomic diversity, community composition and functional diversity of traits related to body size, feeding breadth and migratory tendency.
As expected, compositional heterogeneity had strong positive effects on taxonomic diversity, while configurational heterogeneity had strong positive effects on trait dominance within the community. When landscapes had smaller mean patch size and greater boundary area, communities were dominated by species with more specialized larval feeding, decreased forewing length and limited migratory tendency.
The positive effects of increased configurational landscape heterogeneity outweighed the negative effects of local land‐use intensity on larval‐feeding specialization, at all spatial scales, highlighting its importance for specialists of all dispersal capabilities.
Synthesis and applications
. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250–1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the
EU
2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.
We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250–1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the
EU
2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition. We examined how independent gradients of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, at eight spatial scales, shape taxonomic and functional composition of butterfly communities in 91 managed grasslands across Germany. We used landscape metrics that were calculated from functional maps based on habitat preferences of individual species during different life stages. The relative effects of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity were compared with those of local land‐use intensity on butterfly taxonomic diversity, community composition and functional diversity of traits related to body size, feeding breadth and migratory tendency. As expected, compositional heterogeneity had strong positive effects on taxonomic diversity, while configurational heterogeneity had strong positive effects on trait dominance within the community. When landscapes had smaller mean patch size and greater boundary area, communities were dominated by species with more specialized larval feeding, decreased forewing length and limited migratory tendency. The positive effects of increased configurational landscape heterogeneity outweighed the negative effects of local land‐use intensity on larval‐feeding specialization, at all spatial scales, highlighting its importance for specialists of all dispersal capabilities. Synthesis and applications. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250–1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition. We examined how independent gradients of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, at eight spatial scales, shape taxonomic and functional composition of butterfly communities in 91 managed grasslands across Germany. We used landscape metrics that were calculated from functional maps based on habitat preferences of individual species during different life stages. The relative effects of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity were compared with those of local land-use intensity on butterfly taxonomic diversity, community composition and functional diversity of traits related to body size, feeding breadth and migratory tendency. As expected, compositional heterogeneity had strong positive effects on taxonomic diversity, while configurational heterogeneity had strong positive effects on trait dominance within the community. When landscapes had smaller mean patch size and greater boundary area, communities were dominated by species with more specialized larval feeding, decreased forewing length and limited migratory tendency. The positive effects of increased configurational landscape heterogeneity outweighed the negative effects of local land-use intensity on larval-feeding specialization, at all spatial scales, highlighting its importance for specialists of all dispersal capabilities. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250-1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition. We examined how independent gradients of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, at eight spatial scales, shape taxonomic and functional composition of butterfly communities in 91 managed grasslands across Germany. We used landscape metrics that were calculated from functional maps based on habitat preferences of individual species during different life stages. The relative effects of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity were compared with those of local land‐use intensity on butterfly taxonomic diversity, community composition and functional diversity of traits related to body size, feeding breadth and migratory tendency. As expected, compositional heterogeneity had strong positive effects on taxonomic diversity, while configurational heterogeneity had strong positive effects on trait dominance within the community. When landscapes had smaller mean patch size and greater boundary area, communities were dominated by species with more specialized larval feeding, decreased forewing length and limited migratory tendency. The positive effects of increased configurational landscape heterogeneity outweighed the negative effects of local land‐use intensity on larval‐feeding specialization, at all spatial scales, highlighting its importance for specialists of all dispersal capabilities. Synthesis and applications. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250–1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition.We examined how independent gradients of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, at eight spatial scales, shape taxonomic and functional composition of butterfly communities in 91 managed grasslands across Germany. We used landscape metrics that were calculated from functional maps based on habitat preferences of individual species during different life stages. The relative effects of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity were compared with those of local land-use intensity on butterfly taxonomic diversity, community composition and functional diversity of traits related to body size, feeding breadth and migratory tendency.As expected, compositional heterogeneity had strong positive effects on taxonomic diversity, while configurational heterogeneity had strong positive effects on trait dominance within the community. When landscapes had smaller mean patch size and greater boundary area, communities were dominated by species with more specialized larval feeding, decreased forewing length and limited migratory tendency.The positive effects of increased configurational landscape heterogeneity outweighed the negative effects of local land-use intensity on larval-feeding specialization, at all spatial scales, highlighting its importance for specialists of all dispersal capabilities.Synthesis and applications. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250-1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250-1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Summary Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition. We examined how independent gradients of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, at eight spatial scales, shape taxonomic and functional composition of butterfly communities in 91 managed grasslands across Germany. We used landscape metrics that were calculated from functional maps based on habitat preferences of individual species during different life stages. The relative effects of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity were compared with those of local land‐use intensity on butterfly taxonomic diversity, community composition and functional diversity of traits related to body size, feeding breadth and migratory tendency. As expected, compositional heterogeneity had strong positive effects on taxonomic diversity, while configurational heterogeneity had strong positive effects on trait dominance within the community. When landscapes had smaller mean patch size and greater boundary area, communities were dominated by species with more specialized larval feeding, decreased forewing length and limited migratory tendency. The positive effects of increased configurational landscape heterogeneity outweighed the negative effects of local land‐use intensity on larval‐feeding specialization, at all spatial scales, highlighting its importance for specialists of all dispersal capabilities. Synthesis and applications. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250–1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomic diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250–1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. 1. Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii) configurational heterogeneity (number, size and arrangement of habitat patches), both with different ecological implications for community composition. 2. We examined how independent gradients of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, at eight spatial scales, shape taxonomie and functional composition of butterfly communities in 91 managed grasslands across Germany. We used landscape metrics that were calculated from functional maps based on habitat preferences of individual species during different life stages. The relative effects of compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity were compared with those of local land-use intensity on butterfly taxonomie diversity, community composition and functional diversity of traits related to body size, feeding breadth and migratory tendency. 3. As expected, compositional heterogeneity had strong positive effects on taxonomie diversity, while configurational heterogeneity had strong positive effects on trait dominance within the community. When landscapes had smaller mean patch size and greater boundary area, communities were dominated by species with more specialized larval feeding, decreased forewing length and limited migratory tendency. 4. The positive effects of increased configurational landscape heterogeneity outweighed the negative effects of local land-use intensity on larval-feeding specialization, at all spatial scales, highlighting its importance for specialists of all dispersal capabilities. 5. Synthesis and applications. We show that landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support communities with greater taxonomie diversity, while landscapes with high configurational heterogeneity support communities that include vulnerable species (feeding specialists with larger body size, sedentary nature and more negatively affected by local management intensity). A decline in functional community composition can lead to functional homogenization, affecting the viability of the ecosystems by decreasing the variability in their responses to disturbance and altering their functioning. A landscape management for grasslands that promotes the maintenance of small patch sizes and a diversity of land uses in the surrounding landscape (within 250-1000 m) is recommended for the conservation of diverse butterfly communities. These strategies could also benefit government programmes such as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy in their efforts to reduce the loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. |
| Author | Steckel, Juliane Perović, David Gámez‐Virués, Sagrario Krauss, Jochen Westphal, Catrin Kleijn, David Tscharntke, Teja Börschig, Carmen Erasmi, Stefan Klein, Alexandra‐Maria Rothenwöhrer, Christoph |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Perović, David – sequence: 2 fullname: Gámez‐Virués, Sagrario – sequence: 3 fullname: Börschig, Carmen – sequence: 4 fullname: Klein, Alexandra‐Maria – sequence: 5 fullname: Krauss, Jochen – sequence: 6 fullname: Steckel, Juliane – sequence: 7 fullname: Rothenwöhrer, Christoph – sequence: 8 fullname: Erasmi, Stefan – sequence: 9 fullname: Tscharntke, Teja – sequence: 10 fullname: Westphal, Catrin – sequence: 11 fullname: Kleijn, David |
| BookMark | eNqNkc1vEzEQxS1UJNLCmRNiJS5ctrU9a699RFH5UiWQoGfL8dqJo806eHZV5b_Hm4QeegB8sTXze2-seZfkYkiDJ-Q1o9esnBsGUtRcyuaacdDNM7J4rFyQBaWc1UpT9oJcIm4ppVoALMhmmYYQ11O2Y0yD7aveDh06u_fVxo8-p7UffBwPFW5KDaswDe5MurTbTcPcK699wjjXqxSqdbaIs0-1msbiEfro8SV5HmyP_tX5viL3H29_Lj_Xd98-fVl-uKudANXUKwrcuQBB8hVnTrmgleqAOQ6Kdh1XVlnRNm1LpQ4d57JTVAXvVkCdtLKDK_L-5LvP6dfkcTS7iM735T8-TWiYVLLlvGn1f6BScaEUZwV99wTdpimXLRwpAWW7oAolTpTLCTH7YFwcj4sds429YdTMUZk5GDMHY45RFd3NE90-x53Nh78ozpMeYu8P_8LN1--3f3RvTrotjik_6hpQUgsNpf_21A82GbvOEc39D06ZoJRJpkHCb24Kuns |
| CODEN | JAPEAI |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s13744_020_00824_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_aab_12816 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2025_105920 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_152126 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_5285 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_022_01484_y crossref_primary_10_1111_geb_12622 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy13010233 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_015_0293_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_still_2025_106520 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_5111 crossref_primary_10_3390_f13121981 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2021_107726 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2021_107845 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1172184 crossref_primary_10_3390_d14110968 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2018_01_022 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_021_23931_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecon_2020_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecocom_2021_100969 crossref_primary_10_1071_WR21052 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_021_01261_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40823_018_0031_y crossref_primary_10_1017_S0376892923000097 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_019_00872_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12394 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_122188 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2019_06_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2021_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_82851_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2025_113212 crossref_primary_10_1111_oik_09720 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2019_03_021 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecs2_3499 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_024_01947_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_10588 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12888 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2023_108447 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2018_12_033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2023_109866 crossref_primary_10_1038_ncomms9568 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_08_025 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2023_0897 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_178330 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2018_03_054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rama_2018_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12741 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_021_01368_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11355_018_0367_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2016_11_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2021_107708 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_12346 crossref_primary_10_1590_01047760201622032172 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12290 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2017_10_025 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2022_873366 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_020_01981_z crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_41786_y crossref_primary_10_14720_abs_63_2_15937 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jnc_2019_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_024_05334_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119863 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1906419116 crossref_primary_10_1093_ee_nvaa081 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_12448 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2022_107978 crossref_primary_10_1038_nature20575 crossref_primary_10_3375_043_036_0410 crossref_primary_10_3390_land12112078 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_021_02241_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13585 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1910023117 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecs2_4429 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0181665 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2022_0909 crossref_primary_10_3390_f15091668 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2025_111073 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2017_10_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agrcom_2023_100004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_022_02923_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_024_02861_6 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2021_637371 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12600 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2016_07_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_12488 crossref_primary_10_21829_azm_2023_3912571 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2017_07_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_018_0762_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_150156 crossref_primary_10_1111_een_13367 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2025_109560 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2018_12_022 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_020_01077_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2018_08_023 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_3998 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0233104 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_015_0299_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_021_01392_7 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_ecolsys_110316_022612 crossref_primary_10_3390_land11071018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2016_02_018 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13109 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_025_02055_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12271 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_019_01741_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rmb_2017_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1111_ele_14104 crossref_primary_10_3390_land12091670 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2023_1128228 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2022_107952 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2023_0168 crossref_primary_10_3390_land9050145 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_020_01048_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_016_9940_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2019_105605 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2018_12_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_su151411020 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13257 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_017_0595_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2022_108194 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_024_01809_z crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2605 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2020_107069 crossref_primary_10_1111_afe_12380 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2015_06_030 crossref_primary_10_1111_ele_13265 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_024_00644_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_018_0697_x crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_3813 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2017_11_020 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_022_02498_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_021_00365_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_023_00459_x |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9 10.1016/j.baae.2010.07.009 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01642.x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01255.x 10.2307/3565770 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130148 10.1098/rspb.2004.3002 10.1016/j.agee.2006.08.013 10.1016/j.agee.2012.08.013 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00119.x 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05546.x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01709.x 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.015 10.1098/rstb.2004.1585 10.1016/j.baae.2013.09.002 10.1007/s10980-013-9852-6 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 10.1007/s00442-011-1965-5 10.1890/08-2244.1 10.1007/BF00131172 10.1111/1365-2664.12394 10.1007/s10841-008-9135-8 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x 10.1111/jvs.12022 10.2307/3544901 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01457.x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01487.x 10.1371/journal.pone.0037359 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.022 10.1007/s10980-010-9473-2 10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01143-7 10.1016/B978-012323445-2/50020-1 10.1016/j.baae.2012.04.001 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x 10.1098/rspb.2009.2221 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x 10.18637/jss.v022.i04 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.038 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2015 British Ecological Society 2015 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr 2015 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 British Ecological Society – notice: 2015 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society – notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr 2015 |
| DBID | FBQ AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7SS 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 M7N P64 RC3 7ST 7U6 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12394 |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts AGRICOLA Entomology Abstracts |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Agriculture Biology |
| EISSN | 1365-2664 |
| EndPage | 513 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3632560671 10_1111_1365_2664_12394 JPE12394 43869593 US201500161936 |
| Genre | article Feature |
| GeographicLocations | Germany |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: German Research Foundation funderid: 1374 – fundername: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research funderid: DLR 01LL0917D |
| GroupedDBID | -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 24P 29J 2AX 2WC 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 42X 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHKG AAISJ AAKGQ AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYJJ AAZKR ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEFU ABEML ABHUG ABJNI ABPLY ABPPZ ABPTK ABPVW ABTAH ABTLG ABWRO ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACSTJ ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZLD ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AESBF AEUPB AEUQT AEUYR AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AGUYK AI. AIRJO AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ANHSF AS~ ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI CWIXF D-E D-F DCZOG DEVKO DOOOF DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 DWIUU E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD EQZMY ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FBQ G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X HF~ HGD HQ2 HTVGU HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M JAAYA JBMMH JBS JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSODD JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OK1 P2P P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ UB1 VH1 VOH W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHG WIH WIK WIN WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XIH YQT YYP ZY4 ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHBH AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AAYCA ABSQW ABXSQ ACHIC ADMHG AEFGJ AEYWJ AFWVQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG ALVPJ AQVQM HGLYW IPSME OIG AAYXX AGHNM CITATION 7SN 7SS 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 M7N P64 RC3 7ST 7U6 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5384-b032ccf3f62b21c8cf988d31c2380dd28a8a57477069fd226d808fecb30c6a6d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0021-8901 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:36:32 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 17:51:46 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:53:06 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:58:36 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:55 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:59:01 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 22:32:44 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:18:59 EST 2023 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5384-b032ccf3f62b21c8cf988d31c2380dd28a8a57477069fd226d808fecb30c6a6d3 |
| Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12394 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6755 |
| PQID | 1665302138 |
| PQPubID | 37791 |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1686722479 proquest_miscellaneous_1668258821 proquest_journals_1665302138 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_1365_2664_12394 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12394 wiley_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12394_JPE12394 jstor_primary_43869593 fao_agris_US201500161936 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | April 2015 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2015 text: April 2015 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | The Journal of applied ecology |
| PublicationYear | 2015 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Scientific Publications John Wiley & Sons Ltd Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Scientific Publications – name: John Wiley & Sons Ltd – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | 1989; 3 2010; 11 1997; 62 2005; 272 2013; 28 2010; 79 2010; 13 2011 2013; 24 2007; 120 2009 1997 2013; 166 1995 2014; 172 2003; 18 1970 2003 2007; 30 2011; 14 1991 2002 2012; 15 2012; 13 1998; 86 2010; 85 1999 2009; 12 2012; 152 2009; 13 2013; 14 2005; 360 2009; 32 2010; 25 2007; 116 2005; 8 2010; 277 2004; 35 2015 2013 1992; 65 2012; 7 2007; 22 2006; 128 2011; 167 2012; 87 1987; 49 1973; 4 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_45_1 e_1_2_7_47_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_49_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_50_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 Settele J. (e_1_2_7_39_1) 1999 e_1_2_7_52_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 Settele J. (e_1_2_7_40_1) 2009 e_1_2_7_37_1 Higgins L.G. (e_1_2_7_21_1) 1970 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_46_1 e_1_2_7_48_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 e_1_2_7_51_1 e_1_2_7_30_1 Koch M. (e_1_2_7_24_1) 1991 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_38_1 |
| References_xml | – year: 2011 – volume: 62 start-page: 81 year: 1997 end-page: 91 article-title: Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment – volume: 120 start-page: 179 year: 2007 end-page: 184 article-title: Community richness and stability in agricultural landscapes: the importance of surrounding habitats publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment – volume: 167 start-page: 181 year: 2011 end-page: 188 article-title: CWM and Rao's quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology publication-title: Oecologia – year: 2009 – volume: 18 start-page: 182 year: 2003 end-page: 188 article-title: Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – volume: 13 start-page: 207 year: 2012 end-page: 220 article-title: A quantitative index of land‐use intensity in grasslands: integrating mowing, grazing and fertilization publication-title: Basic and Applied Ecology – volume: 3 start-page: 87 year: 1989 end-page: 96 article-title: Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective publication-title: Landscape Ecology – volume: 14 start-page: 101 year: 2011 end-page: 112 article-title: Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 25 start-page: 941 year: 2010 end-page: 954 article-title: Response of arthropod species richness and functional groups to urban habitat structure and management publication-title: Landscape Ecology – volume: 360 start-page: 339 year: 2005 end-page: 357 article-title: Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insect using butterflies and other indicator groups publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences – volume: 14 start-page: 547 year: 2013 end-page: 554 article-title: Traits of butterfly communities change from specialist to generalist characteristics with increasing land‐use intensity publication-title: Basic and Applied Ecology – volume: 13 start-page: 969 year: 2010 end-page: 979 article-title: Life‐history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross‐continental synthesis publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 116 start-page: 882 year: 2007 end-page: 892 article-title: Let the concept of trait be functional! publication-title: Oikos – volume: 79 start-page: 491 year: 2010 end-page: 500 article-title: How do landscape composition and configuration, organic farming and fallow strips affect the diversity of bees, wasps and their parasitoids? publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 13 start-page: 597 year: 2010 end-page: 605 article-title: Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time‐delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 128 start-page: 542 year: 2006 end-page: 552 article-title: The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: a conservation problem publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 8 start-page: 857 year: 2005 end-page: 874 article-title: Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – Ecosystem service management publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 65 start-page: 169 year: 1992 end-page: 175 article-title: Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes publication-title: Oikos – volume: 7 start-page: e37359 year: 2012 article-title: Species‐Area relationships are controlled by species traits publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 166 start-page: 3 year: 2013 end-page: 14 article-title: The cropping systems mosaic: how does the hidden heterogeneity of agricultural landscapes drive arthropod populations? publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment – volume: 11 start-page: 473 year: 2010 end-page: 485 article-title: Implementing large‐scale and long‐term functional biodiversity research: the biodiversity exploratories publication-title: Basic and Applied Ecology – year: 2015 – volume: 35 start-page: 491 year: 2004 end-page: 522 article-title: Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics – volume: 15 start-page: 74 year: 2012 end-page: 86 article-title: How is dispersal integrated in life histories: a quantitative analysis using butterflies? publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 85 start-page: 625 year: 2010 end-page: 642 article-title: A meta‐analysis of dispersal in butterflies publication-title: Biological Reviews – volume: 30 start-page: 609 year: 2007 end-page: 628 article-title: Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review publication-title: Ecography – volume: 12 start-page: 22 year: 2009 end-page: 33 article-title: Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 172 start-page: 56 year: 2014 end-page: 64 article-title: Landscape composition and configuration differently affect trap‐nesting bees, wasps and their antagonists publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 277 start-page: 2075 year: 2010 end-page: 2082 article-title: Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences – year: 2003 – volume: 86 start-page: 902 year: 1998 end-page: 910 article-title: Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects publication-title: Journal of Ecology – volume: 152 start-page: 253 year: 2012 end-page: 261 article-title: Effects of landscape and habitat quality on butterfly communities in pre‐alpine calcareous grasslands publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 272 start-page: 785 year: 2005 end-page: 790 article-title: Tracking butterfly flight paths across the landscape with harmonic radar publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences – volume: 49 start-page: 340 year: 1987 end-page: 346 article-title: Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns publication-title: Oikos – volume: 32 start-page: 321 year: 2009 end-page: 333 article-title: Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life‐history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes publication-title: Ecography – volume: 87 start-page: 661 year: 2012 end-page: 685 article-title: Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes – eight hypotheses publication-title: Biological Reviews – volume: 4 start-page: 1 year: 1973 end-page: 23 article-title: Resilience and stability of ecological systems publication-title: Annual Review of Ecological Systems – year: 2002 – volume: 13 start-page: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 27 article-title: The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review publication-title: Journal of Insect Conservation – start-page: 359 year: 1997 end-page: 386 – year: 1995 – year: 1970 – volume: 28 start-page: 371 year: 2013 end-page: 383 article-title: Optimizing landscape selection for estimating relative effects of landscape variables on ecological responses publication-title: Landscape Ecology – year: 1991 – volume: 22 start-page: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 20 article-title: The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists publication-title: Journal of Statistical Software – volume: 24 start-page: 949 year: 2013 end-page: 962 article-title: Linking traits between plants and invertebrate herbivores to track functional effects on land‐use changes publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – year: 2013 – year: 1999 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9 – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2010.07.009 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01642.x – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01255.x – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.2307/3565770 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130148 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3002 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.08.013 – ident: e_1_2_7_48_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.08.013 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00119.x – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05546.x – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01709.x – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.015 – volume-title: Schmetterlinge. Die Tagfalter Deutschlands year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1585 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2013.09.002 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9852-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1965-5 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1890/08-2244.1 – volume-title: A Field Guide to the Butterflies of Britain & Europe year: 1970 ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_52_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00131172 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12394 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s10841-008-9135-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x – volume-title: Schmetterlinge year: 1991 ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1111/jvs.12022 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.2307/3544901 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01457.x – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01487.x – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037359 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_51_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.022 – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.1007/s10980-010-9473-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01143-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-012323445-2/50020-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2012.04.001 – volume-title: Die Tagfalter Deutschlands year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_47_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2221 – ident: e_1_2_7_49_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x – ident: e_1_2_7_50_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_46_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.18637/jss.v022.i04 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.038 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x |
| SSID | ssj0009533 |
| Score | 2.5188117 |
| Snippet | Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii)... 1. Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii)... Summary Landscape heterogeneity represents two aspects of landscape simplification: (i) compositional heterogeneity (diversity of habitat types); and (ii)... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref wiley jstor fao |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 505 |
| SubjectTerms | Agricultural land Biodiversity Biodiversity loss Body size butterflies Butterflies & moths Community composition community structure conservation Ecosystems European Union functional diversity functional maps Germany governmental programs and projects Grasslands Habitat management Habitat preferences Habitats Heterogeneity homogenization Land use Landscape Landscape ecology landscape management landscapes land‐use intensity larvae Lepidoptera management migratory behavior species diversity Taxonomy Threatened species trait dominance viability Wildlife conservation wings |
| Title | Configurational landscape heterogeneity shapes functional community composition of grassland butterflies |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43869593 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2F1365-2664.12394 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1665302138 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1668258821 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1686722479 |
| Volume | 52 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9swED-2wmB7WNdupd66ocEe9uJgW7aiPJbSUgobpV1gb0IfVjI24hEnD-tf3ztJDmmhK2NvQZZMpNzH75Tf3QF8so2rx1Wtcyk4BiheFjmlT-Y0jN7H1zqQaL58FefT-uJ7M7AJKRcm1ofYXLiRZgR7TQquTb-l5ImfJepRSe290QrTCMGiq2qr7G5sJk9EBImuLxX3IS7PvfV3_NJTr7uBoHgHem4D2OCBznbBDN89Ek9-jtYrM7I398o6_tfmXsHLhE_ZcRSoPXjSLvbhxfFsmWp0tPvwLPav_PMa5pQv-GO2XqYbRRYSh4lSxeZEs-lQOluE-ayf41jPyImmmTYmpuAzIrUn5hjrPJstEc7Te5iJPbQRJPdvYHp2-u3kPE-tG3KLFrTOTcEraz33ojJVaaX1EykdLy0ihMK5SmqpG4xkxoWYeIcQ0MlC-tYaXlihheMHsLPoFu0hMPKXTWGdQeiHBqZAO-G1ERYDI2Nd2WQwGn44ZVNdc2qv8UsN8Q0dpqLDVOEwM_i8WfA7lvR4eOohSoLSeMi9ml5XdD1EGHnCRQYHQTw2r6i5FFTlOYOjQV5Usge9KoWg9kwllxl83DxGTaa_Z_Si7dZhDobrGPGUf5sjxRhR13iC2w4C9NgW1MXlafjw9l8XvIPntOFIUzqCndVy3b5HBLYyH4KS3QKJCyFB |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-xIQR74GMwLTAgSDzwkiqJE9d9nNCmMrYJwSrtzfJH3CJQg5r2Af763dlO1U0aE-ItShwrdu_jd-7v7gDem9pWw7JSmeAMAxQn8ozSJzO6jd7HVcqTaM7O-XhSnVzWlxu5MKE-xPrAjTTD22tScDqQ3tDySNDi1aCg_t5bcJ_6evuw6mu5UXg3tJMnKoJA5xfL-xCb58YE1zzTllNtT1G8Bj43Iaz3QcdPwPRfH6gnPwarpR6YPzcKO_7f8p7C4whR08MgU8_gXjPfhZ3D6SKW6Wh24UFoYfn7OcwoZfD7dLWIh4qpzx0mVlU6I6ZNiwLaINJPuxne61Lyo3GkCbkp-Ix47ZE8lrYunS4Q0dM8qQ5ttBEndy9gcnx08XGcxe4NmUEjWmU6Z6Uxjjle6rIwwriREJYVBkFCbm0plFA1BjPDnI-cRRRoRS5cYzTLDVfcsj3YnrfzZh9Scpl1bqxG9Ic2JkdT4ZTmBmMjbWxRJzDofzlpYmlz6rDxU_YhDm2mpM2UfjMT-LB-4Veo6nH70H0UBalwkzs5-VbSCRHB5BHjCex5-VhPUTHBqdBzAge9wMhoEjpZcE4dmgomEni3fozKTP_QqHnTrvwYjNgx6Cn-NkbwIQKv4QiX7SXoriXIky9H_uLlv77wFh6OL85O5emn88-v4BEtPrCWDmB7uVg1rxGQLfUbr3FXoS0lXA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-xIRA8DBhMC2wQJB54SeXEies-TmzVGDBNQCXeLH_ELQI1U9M-wF_PneNU3SSGJt6ixLFi9z5-5_7uDuCNrVw5LEqdScExQPGSZZQ-mdFt9D6-1IFE8-lcnE7Ks29VzyakXJiuPsT6wI00I9hrUvBL5zeUPPKzRDnIqb33FtwtBZMk2Mefi426u103eWIiSPR9sboPkXmuTXDFMW153fQMxSvYcxPBBhc0fgSm__iOefJjsFqagf19ra7jf63uMexEgJoedRL1BO7U8114eDRdxCId9S7c6xpY_noKM0oY_D5dLeKRYhoyh4lTlc6IZ9OgeNaI89N2hvfalLxoHGm7zBR8Rqz2SB1LG59OF4jnaZ7UdE20ESW3z2AyPvn67jSLvRsyiya0zAzjhbWee1GYIrfS-pGUjucWIQJzrpBa6gpDmSETI-8QAzrJpK-t4cwKLRzfg-15M6_3ISWHWTHrDGI_tDAMDYXXRliMjIx1eZXAoP_hlI2Fzam_xk_VBzi0mYo2U4XNTODt-oXLrqbH34fuoyQojZvcqsmXgs6HCCSPuEhgL4jHeoqSS0FlnhM46OVFRYPQqlwI6s-Uc5nA6_VjVGX6f0bP62YVxmC8jiFPftMYKYYIu4YjXHYQoH8tQZ1dnISL57d94RXcvzgeq4_vzz-8gAe09o6ydADby8WqPkQ0tjQvg779AR4GJBQ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Configurational+landscape+heterogeneity+shapes+functional+community+composition+of+grassland+butterflies&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+applied+ecology&rft.au=Perovi%C4%87%2C+David&rft.au=G%C3%A1mez%E2%80%90Viru%C3%A9s%2C+Sagrario&rft.au=B%C3%B6rschig%2C+Carmen&rft.au=Klein%2C+Alexandra%E2%80%90Maria&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2F1365-2664.12394&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_1365_2664_12394 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8901&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8901&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8901&client=summon |