Enhanced decision-making in nicotine dependent individuals who abstain: A computational analysis using Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling

• Published in: Drug and alcohol dependence Vol. 250; p. 110890
• Main Authors: Biernacki, Kathryn, Molokotos, Elena, Han, Chungmin, Dillon, Daniel G., Leventhal, Adam M., Janes, Amy C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.09.2023
• Subjects: Choice Behavior; Computational modeling; Computer Simulation; Decision-making; Drift diffusion; Health Behavior; Nicotine; Reward response; Smoking; Decision-making; Drift diffusion; Computational modeling; Nicotine; Reward response
• ISSN: 0376-8716; 1879-0046; 1879-0046
• DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110890

Variability in decision-making capacity and reward responsiveness may underlie differences in the ability to abstain from smoking. Computational modeling of choice behavior, as with the Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Model (HDDM), can help dissociate reward responsiveness from underlying components of decision-making. Here we used the HDDM to identify which decision-making or reward-related parameters, extracted from data acquired in a reward processing task, contributed to the ability of people who smoke that are not seeking treatment to abstain from cigarettes during a laboratory task. 80 adults who smoke cigarettes completed the Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT) - a signal detection task with a differential reinforcement schedule - following smoking as usual, and the Relapse Analogue Task (RAT) - a task in which participants could earn money for delaying smoking up to 50min - after a period of overnight abstinence. Two cohorts were defined by the RAT; those who waited either 0-min (n=36) or the full 50-min (n=44) before smoking. PRT signal detection metrics indicated all subjects learned the task contingencies, with no differences in response bias or discriminability between the two groups. However, HDDM analyses indicated faster drift rates in 50-min vs. 0-min waiters. Relative to those who did not abstain, computational modeling indicated that people who abstained from smoking for 50min showed faster evidence accumulation during reward-based decision-making. These results highlight the importance of decision-making mechanisms to smoking abstinence, and suggest that focusing on the evidence accumulation process may yield new targets for treatment. •Computational models clarify reward-based decisions.•Evidence accumulation differentiates those who can and cannot forgo nicotine use.•Variance in decision making during satiety is related with the choice to smoke.