Quantitative Complexity Theory (QCT) in Integrative Analysis of Cardiovascular Hemodynamic Response to Posture Change

The explanation of physiological mechanisms involved in adaptation of the cardiovascular system to intrinsic and environmental demands is crucial for both basic science and clinical research. Computational algorithms integrating multivariable data that comprehensively depict complex mechanisms of ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLife (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 13; no. 3; p. 632
Main Authors Krzesiński, Paweł, Marczyk, Jacek, Wolszczak, Bartosz, Gielerak, Grzegorz Gerard, Accardi, Francesco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 24.02.2023
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The explanation of physiological mechanisms involved in adaptation of the cardiovascular system to intrinsic and environmental demands is crucial for both basic science and clinical research. Computational algorithms integrating multivariable data that comprehensively depict complex mechanisms of cardiovascular reactivity are currently being intensively researched. Quantitative Complexity Theory (QCT) provides quantitative and holistic information on the state of multi-functional dynamic systems. The present paper aimed to describe the application of QCT in an integrative analysis of the cardiovascular hemodynamic response to posture change. Three subjects that underwent head-up tilt testing under beat-by-beat hemodynamic monitoring (impedance cardiography) were discussed in relation to the complexity trends calculated using QCT software. Complexity has been shown to be a sensitive marker of a cardiovascular hemodynamic response to orthostatic stress and vasodilator administration, and its increase has preceded changes in standard cardiovascular parameters. Complexity profiling has provided a detailed assessment of individual hemodynamic patterns of syncope. Different stimuli and complexity settings produce results of different clinical usability.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Case Study-2
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:2075-1729
2075-1729
DOI:10.3390/life13030632