Assessing physical access to healthy food across United Kingdom: A systematic review of measures and findings

Background Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure “lack of healthy food” and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inObesity science & practice Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 233 - 246
Main Authors Titis, Elzbieta, Procter, Rob, Walasek, Lukasz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Body mass index
Diet
Food
food access
food desert
Food quality
Geography
healthy diet
Neighborhoods
Nutrition research
Obesity
Restaurants
Review
Reviews
RFE
Socioeconomic factors
Systematic review
United Kingdom
United Kingdom > UK
United States > US
United Kingdom
RFE
food desert
food access
obesity
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Background Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure “lack of healthy food” and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. In turn, this leads to a conflicting evidence base being one of the many barriers to using evidence in policy‐making. Aims This systematic review aimed to identify and describe methods used to assess food accessibility in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome heterogeneity by providing a classification of measures. Materials & Methods The literature search included electronic and manual searches of peer‐reviewed literature and was restricted to studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2021. A total of 9365 articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 44 articles were included in the review. All included studies were analysed with regards to their main characteristics (e.g., associations between variables of interest, setting, sample, design, etc.) and definition of RFE and its metrics. When defining these metrics, the present review distinguishes between a point of origin (centroid, address) from which distance was calculated, summary statistic of accessibility (proximity, buffer, Kernel), and definition of distance (Euclidean, network distance). Trends, gaps and limitations are identified and recommendations made for food accessibility research in UK. Results Multiple theoretical and methodological constructs are currently used, mostly quantifying distance by means of Euclidean and ring‐buffer distance, using both proximity‐ and density‐based approaches, and ranging from absolute to relative measures. The association between RFE and diet and health in rural areas, as well as a spatiotemporal domain of food access, remains largely unaccounted. Discussion Evidence suggests that the duration of exposure may bear a greater importance than the level of exposure and that density‐based measures may better capture RFE when compared with proximity‐based measures, however, using more complex measures not necessarily produce better results. To move the field forward, studies have called for a greater focus on causality, individual access and the use of various measures, neighbourhood definitions and potential confounders to capture different aspects and dimensions of the RFE, which requires using univariate measures of accessibility and considering the overall context in terms of varying types of neighbourhoods. Conclusion In order to render ongoing heterogeneity in measuring RFE, researchers should prioritise measures that may provide a more accurate and realistic account of people’s lives and follow an intuitive approach based on convergence of results until consensus could be reached on using some useful standards.
AbstractList Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure "lack of healthy food" and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. In turn, this leads to a conflicting evidence base being one of the many barriers to using evidence in policy-making. This systematic review aimed to identify and describe methods used to assess food accessibility in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome heterogeneity by providing a classification of measures. The literature search included electronic and manual searches of peer-reviewed literature and was restricted to studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2021. A total of 9365 articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 44 articles were included in the review. All included studies were analysed with regards to their main characteristics (e.g., associations between variables of interest, setting, sample, design, etc.) and definition of RFE and its metrics. When defining these metrics, the present review distinguishes between a point of origin (centroid, address) from which distance was calculated, summary statistic of accessibility (proximity, buffer, Kernel), and definition of distance (Euclidean, network distance). Trends, gaps and limitations are identified and recommendations made for food accessibility research in UK. Multiple theoretical and methodological constructs are currently used, mostly quantifying distance by means of Euclidean and ring-buffer distance, using both proximity- and density-based approaches, and ranging from absolute to relative measures. The association between RFE and diet and health in rural areas, as well as a spatiotemporal domain of food access, remains largely unaccounted. Evidence suggests that the duration of exposure may bear a greater importance than the level of exposure and that density-based measures may better capture RFE when compared with proximity-based measures, however, using more complex measures not necessarily produce better results. To move the field forward, studies have called for a greater focus on causality, individual access and the use of various measures, neighbourhood definitions and potential confounders to capture different aspects and dimensions of the RFE, which requires using univariate measures of accessibility and considering the overall context in terms of varying types of neighbourhoods. In order to render ongoing heterogeneity in measuring RFE, researchers should prioritise measures that may provide a more accurate and realistic account of people's lives and follow an intuitive approach based on convergence of results until consensus could be reached on using some useful standards.
Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure "lack of healthy food" and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. In turn, this leads to a conflicting evidence base being one of the many barriers to using evidence in policy-making.BackgroundExisting research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure "lack of healthy food" and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. In turn, this leads to a conflicting evidence base being one of the many barriers to using evidence in policy-making.This systematic review aimed to identify and describe methods used to assess food accessibility in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome heterogeneity by providing a classification of measures.AimsThis systematic review aimed to identify and describe methods used to assess food accessibility in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome heterogeneity by providing a classification of measures.The literature search included electronic and manual searches of peer-reviewed literature and was restricted to studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2021. A total of 9365 articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 44 articles were included in the review. All included studies were analysed with regards to their main characteristics (e.g., associations between variables of interest, setting, sample, design, etc.) and definition of RFE and its metrics. When defining these metrics, the present review distinguishes between a point of origin (centroid, address) from which distance was calculated, summary statistic of accessibility (proximity, buffer, Kernel), and definition of distance (Euclidean, network distance). Trends, gaps and limitations are identified and recommendations made for food accessibility research in UK.Materials & MethodsThe literature search included electronic and manual searches of peer-reviewed literature and was restricted to studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2021. A total of 9365 articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 44 articles were included in the review. All included studies were analysed with regards to their main characteristics (e.g., associations between variables of interest, setting, sample, design, etc.) and definition of RFE and its metrics. When defining these metrics, the present review distinguishes between a point of origin (centroid, address) from which distance was calculated, summary statistic of accessibility (proximity, buffer, Kernel), and definition of distance (Euclidean, network distance). Trends, gaps and limitations are identified and recommendations made for food accessibility research in UK.Multiple theoretical and methodological constructs are currently used, mostly quantifying distance by means of Euclidean and ring-buffer distance, using both proximity- and density-based approaches, and ranging from absolute to relative measures. The association between RFE and diet and health in rural areas, as well as a spatiotemporal domain of food access, remains largely unaccounted.ResultsMultiple theoretical and methodological constructs are currently used, mostly quantifying distance by means of Euclidean and ring-buffer distance, using both proximity- and density-based approaches, and ranging from absolute to relative measures. The association between RFE and diet and health in rural areas, as well as a spatiotemporal domain of food access, remains largely unaccounted.Evidence suggests that the duration of exposure may bear a greater importance than the level of exposure and that density-based measures may better capture RFE when compared with proximity-based measures, however, using more complex measures not necessarily produce better results. To move the field forward, studies have called for a greater focus on causality, individual access and the use of various measures, neighbourhood definitions and potential confounders to capture different aspects and dimensions of the RFE, which requires using univariate measures of accessibility and considering the overall context in terms of varying types of neighbourhoods.DiscussionEvidence suggests that the duration of exposure may bear a greater importance than the level of exposure and that density-based measures may better capture RFE when compared with proximity-based measures, however, using more complex measures not necessarily produce better results. To move the field forward, studies have called for a greater focus on causality, individual access and the use of various measures, neighbourhood definitions and potential confounders to capture different aspects and dimensions of the RFE, which requires using univariate measures of accessibility and considering the overall context in terms of varying types of neighbourhoods.In order to render ongoing heterogeneity in measuring RFE, researchers should prioritise measures that may provide a more accurate and realistic account of people's lives and follow an intuitive approach based on convergence of results until consensus could be reached on using some useful standards.ConclusionIn order to render ongoing heterogeneity in measuring RFE, researchers should prioritise measures that may provide a more accurate and realistic account of people's lives and follow an intuitive approach based on convergence of results until consensus could be reached on using some useful standards.
BACKGROUND: Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure “lack of healthy food” and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. In turn, this leads to a conflicting evidence base being one of the many barriers to using evidence in policy‐making. AIMS: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe methods used to assess food accessibility in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome heterogeneity by providing a classification of measures. MATERIALS & METHODS: The literature search included electronic and manual searches of peer‐reviewed literature and was restricted to studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2021. A total of 9365 articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 44 articles were included in the review. All included studies were analysed with regards to their main characteristics (e.g., associations between variables of interest, setting, sample, design, etc.) and definition of RFE and its metrics. When defining these metrics, the present review distinguishes between a point of origin (centroid, address) from which distance was calculated, summary statistic of accessibility (proximity, buffer, Kernel), and definition of distance (Euclidean, network distance). Trends, gaps and limitations are identified and recommendations made for food accessibility research in UK. RESULTS: Multiple theoretical and methodological constructs are currently used, mostly quantifying distance by means of Euclidean and ring‐buffer distance, using both proximity‐ and density‐based approaches, and ranging from absolute to relative measures. The association between RFE and diet and health in rural areas, as well as a spatiotemporal domain of food access, remains largely unaccounted. DISCUSSION: Evidence suggests that the duration of exposure may bear a greater importance than the level of exposure and that density‐based measures may better capture RFE when compared with proximity‐based measures, however, using more complex measures not necessarily produce better results. To move the field forward, studies have called for a greater focus on causality, individual access and the use of various measures, neighbourhood definitions and potential confounders to capture different aspects and dimensions of the RFE, which requires using univariate measures of accessibility and considering the overall context in terms of varying types of neighbourhoods. CONCLUSION: In order to render ongoing heterogeneity in measuring RFE, researchers should prioritise measures that may provide a more accurate and realistic account of people’s lives and follow an intuitive approach based on convergence of results until consensus could be reached on using some useful standards.
Abstract Background Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure “lack of healthy food” and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. In turn, this leads to a conflicting evidence base being one of the many barriers to using evidence in policy‐making. Aims This systematic review aimed to identify and describe methods used to assess food accessibility in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome heterogeneity by providing a classification of measures. Materials & Methods The literature search included electronic and manual searches of peer‐reviewed literature and was restricted to studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2021. A total of 9365 articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 44 articles were included in the review. All included studies were analysed with regards to their main characteristics (e.g., associations between variables of interest, setting, sample, design, etc.) and definition of RFE and its metrics. When defining these metrics, the present review distinguishes between a point of origin (centroid, address) from which distance was calculated, summary statistic of accessibility (proximity, buffer, Kernel), and definition of distance (Euclidean, network distance). Trends, gaps and limitations are identified and recommendations made for food accessibility research in UK. Results Multiple theoretical and methodological constructs are currently used, mostly quantifying distance by means of Euclidean and ring‐buffer distance, using both proximity‐ and density‐based approaches, and ranging from absolute to relative measures. The association between RFE and diet and health in rural areas, as well as a spatiotemporal domain of food access, remains largely unaccounted. Discussion Evidence suggests that the duration of exposure may bear a greater importance than the level of exposure and that density‐based measures may better capture RFE when compared with proximity‐based measures, however, using more complex measures not necessarily produce better results. To move the field forward, studies have called for a greater focus on causality, individual access and the use of various measures, neighbourhood definitions and potential confounders to capture different aspects and dimensions of the RFE, which requires using univariate measures of accessibility and considering the overall context in terms of varying types of neighbourhoods. Conclusion In order to render ongoing heterogeneity in measuring RFE, researchers should prioritise measures that may provide a more accurate and realistic account of people’s lives and follow an intuitive approach based on convergence of results until consensus could be reached on using some useful standards.
Background Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure “lack of healthy food” and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. In turn, this leads to a conflicting evidence base being one of the many barriers to using evidence in policy‐making. Aims This systematic review aimed to identify and describe methods used to assess food accessibility in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome heterogeneity by providing a classification of measures. Materials & Methods The literature search included electronic and manual searches of peer‐reviewed literature and was restricted to studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2021. A total of 9365 articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 44 articles were included in the review. All included studies were analysed with regards to their main characteristics (e.g., associations between variables of interest, setting, sample, design, etc.) and definition of RFE and its metrics. When defining these metrics, the present review distinguishes between a point of origin (centroid, address) from which distance was calculated, summary statistic of accessibility (proximity, buffer, Kernel), and definition of distance (Euclidean, network distance). Trends, gaps and limitations are identified and recommendations made for food accessibility research in UK. Results Multiple theoretical and methodological constructs are currently used, mostly quantifying distance by means of Euclidean and ring‐buffer distance, using both proximity‐ and density‐based approaches, and ranging from absolute to relative measures. The association between RFE and diet and health in rural areas, as well as a spatiotemporal domain of food access, remains largely unaccounted. Discussion Evidence suggests that the duration of exposure may bear a greater importance than the level of exposure and that density‐based measures may better capture RFE when compared with proximity‐based measures, however, using more complex measures not necessarily produce better results. To move the field forward, studies have called for a greater focus on causality, individual access and the use of various measures, neighbourhood definitions and potential confounders to capture different aspects and dimensions of the RFE, which requires using univariate measures of accessibility and considering the overall context in terms of varying types of neighbourhoods. Conclusion In order to render ongoing heterogeneity in measuring RFE, researchers should prioritise measures that may provide a more accurate and realistic account of people’s lives and follow an intuitive approach based on convergence of results until consensus could be reached on using some useful standards.
BackgroundExisting research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE) quantitatively, there is a little agreement on how to measure “lack of healthy food” and what parameters to use, resulting in a heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. In turn, this leads to a conflicting evidence base being one of the many barriers to using evidence in policy‐making.AimsThis systematic review aimed to identify and describe methods used to assess food accessibility in the United Kingdom (UK) to overcome heterogeneity by providing a classification of measures.Materials & MethodsThe literature search included electronic and manual searches of peer‐reviewed literature and was restricted to studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2021. A total of 9365 articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 44 articles were included in the review. All included studies were analysed with regards to their main characteristics (e.g., associations between variables of interest, setting, sample, design, etc.) and definition of RFE and its metrics. When defining these metrics, the present review distinguishes between a point of origin (centroid, address) from which distance was calculated, summary statistic of accessibility (proximity, buffer, Kernel), and definition of distance (Euclidean, network distance). Trends, gaps and limitations are identified and recommendations made for food accessibility research in UK.ResultsMultiple theoretical and methodological constructs are currently used, mostly quantifying distance by means of Euclidean and ring‐buffer distance, using both proximity‐ and density‐based approaches, and ranging from absolute to relative measures. The association between RFE and diet and health in rural areas, as well as a spatiotemporal domain of food access, remains largely unaccounted.DiscussionEvidence suggests that the duration of exposure may bear a greater importance than the level of exposure and that density‐based measures may better capture RFE when compared with proximity‐based measures, however, using more complex measures not necessarily produce better results. To move the field forward, studies have called for a greater focus on causality, individual access and the use of various measures, neighbourhood definitions and potential confounders to capture different aspects and dimensions of the RFE, which requires using univariate measures of accessibility and considering the overall context in terms of varying types of neighbourhoods.ConclusionIn order to render ongoing heterogeneity in measuring RFE, researchers should prioritise measures that may provide a more accurate and realistic account of people’s lives and follow an intuitive approach based on convergence of results until consensus could be reached on using some useful standards.
Author Titis, Elzbieta
Procter, Rob
Walasek, Lukasz
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Computer Science Warwick Institute for the Science of Cities University of Warwick Coventry UK
3 Alan Turing Institute London UK
2 Department of Computer Science University of Warwick Coventry UK
4 Department of Psychology University of Warwick Coventry UK
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Alan Turing Institute London UK
– name: 1 Department of Computer Science Warwick Institute for the Science of Cities University of Warwick Coventry UK
– name: 4 Department of Psychology University of Warwick Coventry UK
– name: 2 Department of Computer Science University of Warwick Coventry UK
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Elzbieta
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0389-4137
  surname: Titis
  fullname: Titis, Elzbieta
  email: e.titis@warwick.ac.uk
  organization: University of Warwick
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Rob
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8059-5224
  surname: Procter
  fullname: Procter, Rob
  organization: Alan Turing Institute
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lukasz
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7360-0037
  surname: Walasek
  fullname: Walasek, Lukasz
  organization: University of Warwick
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkl1rFDEYhQep2FoL_gIJeNObXfM9iRfCUvwoFipor0MmyexmmUnWZKZl_r2ZbltbUfAqycmTk_Mm78vqIMTgquo1gksEIX4X844uGSfPqiMMGVtgTMTBo_lhdZLzFkKImOQIoxfVIWFECELFUdWvcnY5-7AGu82UvdEd0MYUCQwRbJzuhs0E2hhtkVMs8lXwg7PgazliY_8erECe8uB6PXgDkrv27gbEFvRO5zG5DHSwoPXBFj6_qp63usvu5G48rq4-ffxx9mVxcfn5_Gx1sTCM1GRBTCNLWkJrYrA0REpLIMGwLBBFkDjc4KZuqSBINtBCTYWwgpaCpIGi1eS4Ot_72qi3apd8r9OkovbqVohprXQqeTunqBENkQwSXkNaayRbJrjjsqglgeXF68Peazc2vbPGhSHp7onp053gN2odr5WQNWdUFoPTO4MUf44uD6r32biu08HFMSvMOZSScFb_B0oF5LTms-vbP9BtHFMorzpTHJWLyRz-zePwD6nvG6AAyz1w-7nJtcr4oXxlnGvxnUJQzU2m5iZTpcl-R3w4cO_5F3SxR29856Z_cury-zc6878AQxjd-Q
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthplace_2024_103251
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107651
crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12672
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107627
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0305295
crossref_primary_10_1089_chi_2022_0126
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneb_2024_12_011
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_14537_3
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1368980023000952
crossref_primary_10_1111_tgis_13013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthplace_2024_103315
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthplace_2023_103089
crossref_primary_10_1080_00330124_2024_2306642
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtrangeo_2022_103516
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0302927
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthplace_2024_103356
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.02.007
10.1177/1524839915610517
10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.03.007
10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.09.008
10.1186/1471-2458-11-464
10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.12.005
10.1016/j.appet.2005.04.003
10.1186/s12889-016-3631-7
10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.09.003
10.2105/AJPH.2012.300865
10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.006
10.1111/jhn.12489
10.1017/S1368980010000753
10.1017/S1368980018003063
10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00239.x
10.1068/a38371
10.1177/1757913916650916
10.1186/1476-072X-11-29
10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.012
10.1017/S1368980007001097
10.1017/S1368980018000435
10.1108/00070701211202403
10.1186/s12942-015-0030-8
10.1186/s12966-017-0581-0
10.1136/bmj.325.7361.436
10.3945/ajcn.112.036392
10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000698
10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.012
10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.003
10.1186/s12966-018-0699-8
10.1093/epirev/mxm009
10.1017/S1368980018001477
10.1186/1471-2458-13-454
10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.041
10.3390/ijerph14111290
10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.018
10.1017/S1368980017002075
10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.08.011
10.1186/1479-5868-10-85
10.1093/aepp/ppu035
10.1068/a35150
10.1186/1479-5868-9-75
10.1186/1471-2458-13-70
10.1001/archinternmed.2011.283
10.1186/s12942-016-0052-x
10.1136/bmj.g1464
10.1016/j.canep.2017.08.009
10.1093/aje/kww073
10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.09.004
10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.07.003
10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.023
10.1068/a300595
10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.007
10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.01.011
10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113242
10.1111/obr.12378
10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.02.015
10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.01.004
10.1017/S1368980017002336
10.1093/ije/dyp221
10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30212-8
10.1136/jech.2010.116749
10.1371/journal.pone.0183700
10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01084.x
10.1186/1476-072X-7-16
10.1017/S1368980016002123
10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.02.004
10.1186/s12966-016-0345-2
10.1186/1479-5868-7-34
10.1002/osp4.477
10.1038/s41597-019-0114-6
10.1017/S1368980009992035
10.1186/s12889-018-5383-z
10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00340.x
10.1186/1476-072X-12-33
10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.005
10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30208-0
10.3390/ijerph14111366
10.1186/s12942-017-0106-8
10.1186/1476-072X-10-37
10.1186/s12916-020-01513-0
10.1186/1479-5868-4-32
10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.024
10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.019
10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.02.003
10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00715.x
10.1007/s11524-009-9379-y
10.1080/0042098022000011362
10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.036
10.2105/AJPH.2004.042150
10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100404
10.1186/1472-6963-9-200
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112858
10.1186/1479-5868-9-37
10.1002/osp4.442
10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
10.1093/pubmed/fdx108
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
8FE
8FH
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
LK8
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1002/osp4.563
DatabaseName Wiley_OA刊
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection (ProQuest)
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Open Access Full Text
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA


Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Geography
EISSN 2055-2238
EndPage 246
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_4c8b3950367047a19f586e698b3153d6
PMC8976549
35388348
10_1002_osp4_563
OSP4563
Genre reviewArticle
Journal Article
Review
GeographicLocations United Kingdom--UK
United States--US
United Kingdom
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom--UK
– name: United States--US
– name: United Kingdom
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  funderid: EP/L016400/1
– fundername: ;
  grantid: EP/L016400/1
GroupedDBID 0R~
1OC
24P
53G
5VS
8FE
8FH
AAHHS
ACCFJ
ACCMX
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADKYN
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEQDE
AFKRA
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AOIJS
AVUZU
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M7P
O9-
OK1
PIMPY
PROAC
RPM
WIN
AAYXX
CITATION
M~E
PHGZM
PHGZT
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
NPM
PQGLB
ABUWG
AZQEC
COVID
DWQXO
GNUQQ
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5373-3cb90153473c29c399d30320c2914103e2b2b7f48319b0d0a488d843489c08fa3
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 2055-2238
IngestDate Tue Aug 26 23:51:48 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:50:45 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 18:29:56 EDT 2025
Wed Jul 30 11:18:09 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 10:50:23 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:46:08 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:35:31 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:15 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:25:23 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords RFE
food desert
food access
obesity
Language English
License Attribution
2021 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5373-3cb90153473c29c399d30320c2914103e2b2b7f48319b0d0a488d843489c08fa3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-7360-0037
0000-0001-8059-5224
0000-0003-0389-4137
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2646149336?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 35388348
PQID 2646149336
PQPubID 4370297
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4c8b3950367047a19f586e698b3153d6
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8976549
proquest_miscellaneous_2660993657
proquest_miscellaneous_2648064769
proquest_journals_2646149336
pubmed_primary_35388348
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_osp4_563
crossref_primary_10_1002_osp4_563
wiley_primary_10_1002_osp4_563_OSP4563
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate April 2022
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2022
  text: April 2022
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Obesity science & practice
PublicationTitleAlternate Obes Sci Pract
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2017; 83
2015; 37
2015; 36
2010; 16
2009; 86
2010; 13
2016; 107
2004; 28
2017; 44
2019; 57
2015; 33
2014; 27
2015 May; 33
2008; 7
2011; 11
2020; 249
2011; 10
2012; 18
2011; 56
2011; 12
2018; 40
2011; 17
2005; 27
2012; 11
2012; 10
2016; 184
2020; 18
2007; 29
2020; 7
2020; 6
2017; 30
2018; 3
2018; 2
2013; 10
2019; 22
2013; 13
2013; 12
2013; 97
2011; 72
2011; 65
2007; 4
2014; 51
2007; 65
2010; 7
2019; 8
2002; 39
2017; 20
2009; 69
2015; 14
2015; 17
2019; 6
2012; 102
2020; 261
2010; 39
2003; 35
2007
2008; 11
2016; 17
2016; 16
2018; 21
2011; 171
2016; 15
2007; 13
2017; 137
2012; 75
2005; 45
2016; 13
2017; 50
2018; 18
2018; 111
2010; 86
2014; 348
2012; 2
2017; 14
2021
2015; 62
2020
2017; 16
2002; 23
2017; 12
2005; 95
2019
2009; 9
2018
2002; 325
2009; 6
2013
2014; 30
2012; 114
1998; 30
2008; 40
2018; 54
2018; 15
2012; 42
2012; 9
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_68_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_22_1
e_1_2_8_45_1
e_1_2_8_64_1
e_1_2_8_87_1
e_1_2_8_41_1
e_1_2_8_60_1
e_1_2_8_83_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_109_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_38_1
e_1_2_8_57_1
Economic Research Service (ERS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (e_1_2_8_101_1) 2020
e_1_2_8_91_1
e_1_2_8_95_1
e_1_2_8_99_1
e_1_2_8_105_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_76_1
e_1_2_8_30_1
e_1_2_8_72_1
e_1_2_8_29_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
Mari Gallagher Research & Consulting Group (e_1_2_8_104_1) 2007
e_1_2_8_48_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
Goudie S (e_1_2_8_54_1) 2021
e_1_2_8_67_1
e_1_2_8_44_1
e_1_2_8_86_1
e_1_2_8_63_1
e_1_2_8_40_1
e_1_2_8_82_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_37_1
e_1_2_8_79_1
e_1_2_8_94_1
Public Health England (e_1_2_8_50_1) 2013
e_1_2_8_90_1
UNICEF (e_1_2_8_49_1) 2019
e_1_2_8_98_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_106_1
e_1_2_8_33_1
e_1_2_8_75_1
e_1_2_8_52_1
e_1_2_8_102_1
e_1_2_8_71_1
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_47_1
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_81_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_43_1
e_1_2_8_66_1
e_1_2_8_89_1
Corfe S (e_1_2_8_53_1) 2018
e_1_2_8_62_1
e_1_2_8_85_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
Ipsos Mori and Food Standards Agency (e_1_2_8_56_1) 2020
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_36_1
e_1_2_8_59_1
Polsky JY (e_1_2_8_8_1) 2016; 107
e_1_2_8_70_1
Dunn RA (e_1_2_8_97_1) 2012; 10
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_55_1
e_1_2_8_78_1
e_1_2_8_107_1
e_1_2_8_51_1
e_1_2_8_74_1
e_1_2_8_103_1
e_1_2_8_93_1
e_1_2_8_46_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
e_1_2_8_69_1
e_1_2_8_80_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_88_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_65_1
e_1_2_8_84_1
e_1_2_8_61_1
e_1_2_8_39_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
Beaulac J (e_1_2_8_42_1) 2009; 6
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_58_1
e_1_2_8_92_1
e_1_2_8_96_1
e_1_2_8_100_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_77_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_108_1
e_1_2_8_73_1
References_xml – volume: 11
  start-page: 29
  year: 2012
  article-title: Does the choice of neighbourhood supermarket access measure influence associations with individual‐level fruit and vegetable consumption? A case study from Glasgow
  publication-title: Int J Health Geogr
– volume: 39
  start-page: 2061
  issue: 11
  year: 2002
  end-page: 2082
  article-title: Assessing the impact of improved retail access on diet in a “food desert”: a preliminary report
  publication-title: Urban Stud.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 162
  year: 2014
  end-page: 170
  article-title: Effects of buffer size and shape on associations between the built environment and energy balance
  publication-title: Health Place
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1240
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1247
  article-title: The food retail environment in school neighborhoods and its relation to lunchtime eating behaviors in youth from three countries
  publication-title: Health Place
– volume: 20
  start-page: 3304
  issue: 18
  year: 2017
  end-page: 3315
  article-title: Supermarket access, transport mode and BMI: the potential for urban design and planning policy across socio‐economic areas
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– volume: 72
  start-page: 1411
  issue: 9
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1419
  article-title: Environmental correlates of adiposity in 9‐10 year old children: considering home and school neighbourhoods and routes to school
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
– volume: 37
  start-page: 205
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  end-page: 225
  article-title: Measuring food access and food deserts for policy purposes
  publication-title: Appl Econ Perspect Policy
– volume: 137
  start-page: 158
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  end-page: 161
  article-title: How different data sources and definitions of neighbourhood influence the association between food outlet availability and body mass index: a cross‐sectional study
  publication-title: Perspect Public Health
– volume: 6
  start-page: 107
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  article-title: Open data on health‐related neighbourhood features in Great Britain
  publication-title: Sci Data
– volume: 42
  start-page: E77
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: E85
  article-title: Fast food and obesity: a spatial analysis in a large United Kingdom population of children aged 13‐15
  publication-title: Am J Prev Med
– volume: 13
  start-page: 454
  year: 2013
  article-title: Do residents’ perceptions of being well‐placed and objective presence of local amenities match? A case study in West Central Scotland, UK
  publication-title: BMC Publ Health
– volume: 7
  start-page: 302
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  end-page: 306
  article-title: The impact of the novel coronavirus movement restrictions in the United Kingdom on food outlet usage and body mass index
  publication-title: Obes Sci Pract
– volume: 2
  start-page: e438
  issue: 10
  year: 2018
  end-page: e450
  article-title: Are exposures to ready‐to‐eat food environments associated with type 2 diabetes? A cross‐sectional study of 347,551 UK Biobank adult participants
  publication-title: Lancet Planet Heal
– volume: 16
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  article-title: Does exposure to the food environment differ by socioeconomic position? Comparing area‐based and person‐centred metrics in the Fenland Study, UK
  publication-title: Int J Health Geogr
– volume: 57
  start-page: 186
  year: 2019
  end-page: 199
  article-title: A systematic review employing the GeoFERN framework to examine methods, reporting quality and associations between the retail food environment and obesity
  publication-title: Heal Place
– volume: 40
  start-page: 402
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  end-page: 422
  article-title: Reducing inequalities in health and diet: findings from a study on the impact of a food retail development
  publication-title: Environ Plan A
– volume: 102
  start-page: 1644
  issue: 9
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1654
  article-title: Neighborhood disparities in access to healthy foods and their effects on environmental justice
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
– volume: 20
  start-page: 3316
  issue: 18
  year: 2017
  end-page: 3325
  article-title: Greater access to healthy food outlets in the home and school environment is associated with better dietary quality in young children
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– volume: 30
  start-page: 595
  year: 1998
  end-page: 613
  article-title: Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds
  publication-title: Environ Plan A
– volume: 6
  start-page: 735
  issue: 6
  year: 2020
  end-page: 740
  article-title: Weight‐related lifestyle behaviours and the COVID‐19 crisis: an online survey study of UK adults during social lockdown
  publication-title: Obes Sci Pract
– volume: 56
  start-page: 693
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 703
  article-title: From neighborhood design and food options to residents’ weight status
  publication-title: Appetite
– volume: 23
  start-page: 64
  issue: 2 suppl
  year: 2002
  end-page: 73
  article-title: How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning
  publication-title: Am J Prev Med
– volume: 11
  start-page: 464
  year: 2011
  article-title: Is proximity to a food retail store associated with diet and BMI in Glasgow, Scotland?
  publication-title: BMC Publ Health
– year: 2019
– volume: 17
  start-page: 19
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2016
  end-page: 30
  article-title: Neighbourhood typology based on virtual audit of environmental obesogenic characteristics
  publication-title: Obes Rev
– volume: 13
  start-page: 21
  year: 2016
  article-title: The relationship between unhealthy food sales, socio‐economic deprivation and childhood weight status: results of a cross‐sectional study in England
  publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
– volume: 50
  start-page: 99
  issue: Pt A
  year: 2017
  end-page: 106
  article-title: Association between the neighborhood obesogenic environment and colorectal cancer risk in the multiethnic cohort
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 175
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  end-page: 190
  article-title: The built environment and obesity: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence
  publication-title: Health Place
– year: 2007
– volume: 6
  issue: 7
  year: 2009
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement
  publication-title: PLoS Med
– volume: 249
  year: 2020
  article-title: US County “food swamp” severity and hospitalization rates among adults with diabetes: a nonlinear relationship
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
– volume: 9
  start-page: 37
  year: 2012
  article-title: The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources across urban/rural and socio‐economic classifications in England
  publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
– volume: 12
  start-page: e460
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  end-page: e471
  article-title: A systematic review of fast food access studies
  publication-title: Obes Rev
– volume: 62
  start-page: 8
  year: 2015
  end-page: 18
  article-title: Potential food deserts and food oases in a post‐communist city: access, quality, variability and price of food in Bratislava‐Petržalka
  publication-title: Appl Geogr
– volume: 18
  start-page: 482
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  article-title: Is adolescent body mass index and waist circumference associated with the food environments surrounding schools and homes? A longitudinal analysis
  publication-title: BMC Publ Health
– volume: 7
  start-page: 34
  year: 2010
  article-title: What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults’ definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods
  publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 13
  article-title: The effect of fast‐food availability on fast‐food consumption and obesity among rural residents: an analysis by race/ethnicity
  publication-title: Econ Hum Biol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 71
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  article-title: Examining the interaction of fast‐food outlet exposure and income on diet and obesity: evidence from 51,361 UK Biobank participants
  publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
– volume: 13
  start-page: 70
  year: 2013
  article-title: Does the local food environment around schools affect diet? Longitudinal associations in adolescents attending secondary schools in East London
  publication-title: BMC Publ Health
– volume: 10
  start-page: 85
  year: 2013
  article-title: Characterising food environment exposure at home, at work, and along commuting journeys using data on adults in the UK
  publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
– volume: 16
  start-page: 666
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 673
  article-title: The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources
  publication-title: Health Place
– volume: 9
  start-page: 75
  year: 2012
  article-title: Neighbourhood food and physical activity environments in England, UK: does ethnic density matter?
  publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
– volume: 28
  start-page: 222
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  end-page: 234
  article-title: Measuring physical access to ‘healthy foods’ in areas of social deprivation: a case study in Cardiff
  publication-title: Int J Consum Stud
– volume: 29
  start-page: 129
  year: 2007
  end-page: 143
  article-title: The built environment and obesity
  publication-title: Epidemiol Rev
– volume: 261
  year: 2020
  article-title: Do neighbourhood characteristics act together to influence BMI? A cross‐sectional study of urban parks and takeaway/fast‐food stores as modifiers of the effect of physical activity facilities
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
– volume: 14
  start-page: 128
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  article-title: Investigating the importance of the local food environment for fruit and vegetable intake in older men and women in 20 UK towns: a cross‐sectional analysis of two national cohorts using novel methods
  publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
– volume: 45
  start-page: 195
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  end-page: 197
  article-title: Do “food deserts” influence fruit and vegetable consumption? A cross‐sectional study
  publication-title: Appetite
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1048
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1056
  article-title: Food outlet availability, deprivation and obesity in a multi‐ethnic sample of pregnant women in Bradford, UK
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
– volume: 86
  start-page: 409
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 430
  article-title: Disparities in neighborhood food environments: implications of measurement strategies
  publication-title: Econ Geogr
– volume: 184
  start-page: 837
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  end-page: 846
  article-title: The local food environment and fruit and vegetable intake: a geographically weighted regression approach in the ORiEL study
  publication-title: Am J Epidemiol
– volume: 97
  start-page: 167
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 172
  article-title: Does transportation mode modify associations between distance to food store, fruit and vegetable consumption, and BMI in low‐income neighborhoods?
  publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr
– year: 2013
– volume: 33
  start-page: 142
  year: 2015
  end-page: 147
  article-title: Area deprivation and the food environment over time: a repeated cross‐sectional study on takeaway outlet density and supermarket presence in Norfolk, UK, 1990‐2008
  publication-title: Health Place
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1124
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1128
  article-title: The association between the geography of fast food outlets and childhood obesity rates in Leeds, UK
  publication-title: Health Place
– volume: 40
  start-page: 237
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  end-page: 244
  article-title: Weight gain in mid‐childhood and its relationship with the fast food environment
  publication-title: J Public Heal
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1306
  issue: 9
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1310
  article-title: Neighbourhoods in eco‐epidemiologic research: delimiting personal exposure areas. A response to Riva, Gauvin, Apparicio and Brodeur
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
– volume: 83
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Food deserts? Healthy food access in Amsterdam
  publication-title: Appl Geogr
– volume: 11
  start-page: 624
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  end-page: 631
  article-title: Race and food store availability in an inner‐city neighbourhood
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– volume: 30
  start-page: 145
  year: 2014
  end-page: 153
  article-title: Neighborhood socioeconomic status and food environment: a 20‐year longitudinal latent class analysis among CARDIA participants
  publication-title: Heal Place
– volume: 7
  start-page: 16
  year: 2008
  article-title: Mapping the evolution of “food deserts” in a Canadian city: supermarket accessibility in London, Ontario, 1961–2005
  publication-title: Int J Health Geogr
– volume: 12
  issue: 8
  year: 2017
  article-title: The relationship between dietary quality and the local food environment differs according to level of educational attainment: a cross‐sectional study
  publication-title: PLoS One
– year: 2021
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1825
  issue: 9
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1838
  article-title: Understanding and representing “place” in health research: a relational approach
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
– volume: 14
  start-page: 37
  year: 2015
  article-title: Identifying food deserts and swamps based on relative healthy food access: a spatio‐temporal Bayesian approach
  publication-title: Int J Heal Geogr
– year: 2018
– volume: 114
  start-page: 224
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  end-page: 238
  article-title: Access to healthy food in Nantes, France
  publication-title: Br Food J
– volume: 3
  start-page: e24
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: e33
  article-title: Associations between fast food and physical activity environments and adiposity in mid‐life: cross‐sectional, observational evidence from UK Biobank
  publication-title: Lancet Public Heal
– volume: 325
  start-page: 436
  issue: 7361
  year: 2002
  end-page: 438
  article-title: “Food deserts”—evidence and assumption in health policy making
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 10
  start-page: 37
  year: 2011
  article-title: Association between proximity to and coverage of traditional fast‐food restaurants and non‐traditional fast‐food outlets and fast‐food consumption among rural adults
  publication-title: Int J Health Geogr
– volume: 17
  start-page: 400
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  end-page: 407
  article-title: Finding food deserts: a comparison of methods measuring spatial access to food stores
  publication-title: Health Promot Pract
– volume: 21
  start-page: 2842
  issue: 15
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2851
  article-title: Associations between home and school neighbourhood food environments and adolescents’ fast‐food and sugar‐sweetened beverage intakes: findings from the Olympic Regeneration in East London (ORiEL) Study
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– volume: 348
  start-page: g1464
  year: 2014
  end-page: g1464
  article-title: Associations between exposure to takeaway food outlets, takeaway food consumption, and body weight in Cambridgeshire, UK: population based, cross sectional study
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 35
  start-page: 151
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 188
  article-title: Deprivation, diet and food retail access: findings from the Leeds “Food Deserts” Study
  publication-title: Env Plann A
– volume: 111
  start-page: 351
  year: 2018
  end-page: 357
  article-title: Neighbourhood typologies and associations with body mass index and obesity: a cross‐sectional study
  publication-title: Prev Med
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1366
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  article-title: Food swamps predict obesity rates better than food deserts in the United States
  publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health
– volume: 107
  start-page: 5312
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2016
  article-title: Relative and absolute availability of fast‐food restaurants in relation to the development of diabetes: a population‐based cohort study
  publication-title: Can J Public Heal
– volume: 36
  start-page: 74
  year: 2015
  end-page: 87
  article-title: Multiple pathways from the neighborhood food environment to increased body mass index through dietary behaviors: a structural equation‐based analysis in the CARDIA study
  publication-title: Heal Place
– volume: 15
  start-page: 23
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  article-title: Health research needs more comprehensive accessibility measures: integrating time and transport modes from open data
  publication-title: Int J Health Geogr
– volume: 12
  start-page: 33
  year: 2013
  article-title: Creating “obesogenic realities”; do our methodological choices make a difference when measuring the food environment?
  publication-title: Int J Heal Geogr
– volume: 18
  start-page: 43
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  article-title: Are environmental area characteristics at birth associated with overweight and obesity in school‐aged children? Findings from the SLOPE (Studying Lifecourse Obesity PrEdictors) population‐based cohort in the south of England
  publication-title: BMC Med
– volume: 6
  start-page: A105
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  article-title: A systematic review of food deserts, 1966‐2007
  publication-title: Prev Chronic Dis
– volume: 8
  year: 2019
  article-title: Methods of measuring associations between the retail food environment and weight status: importance of classifications and metrics
  publication-title: SSM Popul Heal
– volume: 21
  start-page: 2103
  issue: 11
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2116
  article-title: Activity space‐based measures of the food environment and their relationships to food purchasing behaviours for young urban adults in Canada
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– volume: 65
  start-page: 881
  issue: 10
  year: 2011
  end-page: 888
  article-title: Irish exceptionalism? Local food environments and dietary quality
  publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health
– volume: 17
  start-page: 696
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  end-page: 700
  article-title: Measuring food deserts in New York City's low‐income neighborhoods
  publication-title: Heal Place
– volume: 95
  start-page: 660
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  end-page: 667
  article-title: Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in Metropolitan Detroit
  publication-title: Am J Public Heal
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1290
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  article-title: Interplay of socioeconomic status and supermarket distance is associated with excess obesity risk: a UK cross‐sectional study
  publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health
– volume: 33
  start-page: 9
  year: 2015 May
  end-page: 18
  article-title: Combined measure of neighborhood food and physical activity environments and weight‐related outcomes: the CARDIA study
  publication-title: Health Place
– volume: 171
  start-page: 1162
  issue: 13
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1170
  article-title: Fast food restaurants and food stores—longitudinal associations with diet in young to middle‐aged adults: the CARDIA study
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
– volume: 30
  start-page: 791
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  end-page: 799
  article-title: Deprivation and healthy food access, cost and availability: a cross‐sectional study
  publication-title: J Hum Nutr Diet
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Between exposure, access and use: reconsidering foodscape influences on dietary behaviours
  publication-title: Heal Place
– volume: 17
  start-page: 738
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 747
  article-title: Assessing the obesogenic environment of North East England
  publication-title: Health Place
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1022
  issue: 7
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1030
  article-title: Impact of neighbourhood food environment on food consumption in children aged 9‐10 years in the UK SPEEDY (Sport, Physical Activity and Eating behaviour: Environmental Determinants in Young people) study
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– volume: 27
  start-page: 331
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  end-page: 348
  article-title: Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: levels, causes, and effects
  publication-title: J Urban Aff
– volume: 13
  start-page: 877
  issue: 4
  year: 2007
  end-page: 885
  article-title: Measuring food access in Melbourne: access to healthy and fast foods by car, bus and foot in an urban municipality in Melbourne
  publication-title: Heal Place
– volume: 4
  start-page: 32
  year: 2007
  article-title: Deprivation amplification revisited; or, is it always true that poorer places have poorer access to resources for healthy diets and physical activity?
  publication-title: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
– volume: 39
  start-page: 277
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 284
  article-title: Neighbourhood food environment and area deprivation: spatial accessibility to grocery stores selling fresh fruit and vegetables in urban and rural settings
  publication-title: Int J Epidemiol
– volume: 16
  start-page: 984
  year: 2016
  article-title: Associations between the neighbourhood food environment, neighbourhood socioeconomic status, and diet quality: an observational study
  publication-title: BMC Publ Health
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1773
  issue: 11
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1785
  article-title: Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems: a methodological review
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– volume: 54
  start-page: 11
  year: 2018
  end-page: 19
  article-title: Developing an openly accessible multi‐dimensional small area index of ‘access to healthy assets and hazards’ for Great Britain, 2016
  publication-title: Health Place
– volume: 20
  start-page: 2598
  issue: 14
  year: 2017
  end-page: 2607
  article-title: Food swamps and food deserts in Baltimore City, MD, USA: associations with dietary behaviours among urban adolescent girls
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– year: 2020
– volume: 2
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  article-title: Are neighbourhood food resources distributed inequitably by income and race in the USA? Epidemiological findings across the urban spectrum
  publication-title: BMJ Open
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1037
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1047
  article-title: Exploring absolute and relative measures of exposure to food environments in relation to dietary patterns among European adults
  publication-title: Public Health Nutr
– volume: 9
  start-page: 200
  year: 2009
  article-title: Comparison of distance measures in spatial analytical modeling for health service planning
  publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res
– volume: 51
  start-page: 99
  year: 2014
  end-page: 107
  article-title: Capturing individuals’ food environments using flexible space‐time accessibility measures
  publication-title: Appl Geogr
– volume: 86
  start-page: 683
  issue: 5
  year: 2009
  end-page: 695
  article-title: Body mass index, neighborhood fast food and restaurant concentration, and car ownership
  publication-title: J Urban Heal
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.02.007
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.1177/1524839915610517
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.03.007
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.09.008
– ident: e_1_2_8_109_1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-464
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.12.005
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_8_97_1
  article-title: The effect of fast‐food availability on fast‐food consumption and obesity among rural residents: an analysis by race/ethnicity
  publication-title: Econ Hum Biol
– volume-title: The COVID‐19 Consumer Research
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_8_56_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_60_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2005.04.003
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3631-7
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.09.003
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300865
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.006
– volume: 6
  start-page: A105
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_8_42_1
  article-title: A systematic review of food deserts, 1966‐2007
  publication-title: Prev Chronic Dis
– ident: e_1_2_8_79_1
  doi: 10.1111/jhn.12489
– ident: e_1_2_8_51_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000753
– ident: e_1_2_8_71_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003063
– ident: e_1_2_8_52_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00239.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.1068/a38371
– ident: e_1_2_8_65_1
  doi: 10.1177/1757913916650916
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-11-29
– ident: e_1_2_8_100_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.012
– volume-title: Food Access Research Atlas
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_8_101_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980007001097
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000435
– volume-title: The State of the World's Children 2019. Children, Food and Nutrition: Growing Well in a Changing World
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_2_8_49_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_61_1
  doi: 10.1108/00070701211202403
– ident: e_1_2_8_45_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12942-015-0030-8
– ident: e_1_2_8_81_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0581-0
– volume-title: What Are the Barriers to Eating Healthily in the UK?
  year: 2018
  ident: e_1_2_8_53_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_40_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7361.436
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.036392
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000698
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.012
– ident: e_1_2_8_62_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.003
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0699-8
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm009
– ident: e_1_2_8_84_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001477
– ident: e_1_2_8_95_1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-454
– ident: e_1_2_8_46_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.041
– ident: e_1_2_8_107_1
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111290
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.018
– ident: e_1_2_8_91_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002075
– ident: e_1_2_8_47_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.08.011
– ident: e_1_2_8_94_1
  doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-85
– ident: e_1_2_8_37_1
  doi: 10.1093/aepp/ppu035
– ident: e_1_2_8_38_1
  doi: 10.1068/a35150
– ident: e_1_2_8_73_1
  doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-75
– ident: e_1_2_8_77_1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-70
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.283
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0052-x
– volume: 107
  start-page: 5312
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  article-title: Relative and absolute availability of fast‐food restaurants in relation to the development of diabetes: a population‐based cohort study
  publication-title: Can J Public Heal
– ident: e_1_2_8_76_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1464
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.08.009
– ident: e_1_2_8_83_1
  doi: 10.1093/aje/kww073
– ident: e_1_2_8_70_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.09.004
– ident: e_1_2_8_99_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.07.003
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.023
– ident: e_1_2_8_103_1
  doi: 10.1068/a300595
– ident: e_1_2_8_68_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.007
– ident: e_1_2_8_67_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.01.011
– volume-title: A Crisis Within a Crisis: The Impact of Covid‐19 on Household Food Security. Insights from Food Foundation Surveys on How the Pandemic Has Affected Food Access in the UK (March 2020 to January 2021)
  year: 2021
  ident: e_1_2_8_54_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_96_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113242
– ident: e_1_2_8_82_1
  doi: 10.1111/obr.12378
– ident: e_1_2_8_63_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.02.015
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.01.004
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002336
– ident: e_1_2_8_69_1
  doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp221
– ident: e_1_2_8_102_1
  doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30212-8
– ident: e_1_2_8_66_1
  doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.116749
– ident: e_1_2_8_75_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183700
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01084.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_59_1
  doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-16
– ident: e_1_2_8_48_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002123
– ident: e_1_2_8_85_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.02.004
– ident: e_1_2_8_80_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0345-2
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-34
– ident: e_1_2_8_55_1
  doi: 10.1002/osp4.477
– ident: e_1_2_8_88_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0114-6
– ident: e_1_2_8_108_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1368980009992035
– ident: e_1_2_8_78_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5383-z
– ident: e_1_2_8_39_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2003.00340.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_89_1
  doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-33
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.005
– ident: e_1_2_8_74_1
  doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30208-0
– ident: e_1_2_8_43_1
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111366
– ident: e_1_2_8_72_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0106-8
– ident: e_1_2_8_98_1
  doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-10-37
– ident: e_1_2_8_90_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01513-0
– ident: e_1_2_8_41_1
  doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-32
– ident: e_1_2_8_87_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.024
– ident: e_1_2_8_106_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.019
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.02.003
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00715.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9379-y
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1080/0042098022000011362
– volume-title: Examining the Impact of Food Deserts on Public Health in Detroit
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_8_104_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_105_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.036
– ident: e_1_2_8_58_1
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042150
– ident: e_1_2_8_92_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100404
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-200
– ident: e_1_2_8_64_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
– ident: e_1_2_8_44_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112858
– ident: e_1_2_8_86_1
  doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-37
– ident: e_1_2_8_57_1
  doi: 10.1002/osp4.442
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
– ident: e_1_2_8_93_1
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx108
– volume-title: Social and Economic Inequalities in Diet and Physical Activity
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_8_50_1
SSID ssj0001596121
Score 2.3084772
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Background Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE)...
Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE)...
BackgroundExisting research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE)...
BACKGROUND: Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food environment (RFE)...
Abstract Background Existing research suggests that physical access to food can affect diet quality and thus obesity rates. When defining retail food...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 233
SubjectTerms Body mass index
Diet
Food
food access
food desert
Food quality
Geography
healthy diet
Neighborhoods
Nutrition research
Obesity
Restaurants
Review
Reviews
RFE
Socioeconomic factors
Systematic review
United Kingdom
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hHhAXxJtAQa6E4BSazdiJza0gqgqpgASVerP8hEpssmK3B_49Yzu77IoCF46xrcgZz2g-Z2a-AXjGLc5iZ1QdZWhrbnio6RoU68Y7oVyrorIponv6vjs54-_OxflWq6-UE1bogYvgDrmTFpVoEtEY781MRSG70CkaJWP1mWybfN7WZarUB6tEjbVmm23aw3G54C9Fhzv-J9P0X4Utf0-R3Iau2fcc34KbE2hkR2Wzt-FaGO7A9dMpLH4X5iV0S16ILSa5M5M7IbLVyEqp4w8Wx9HTcNoWK1CTpY4mfpy_YkfsF6UzK-UsbIxsXv4gLpkZPMvh7eHL8h6cHb_9_Oaknvoo1E5gjzU6m7w-8h5J-o4gicfUN50eUpYnhta2to9ckjnaxjeGjNpLjlwq18ho8D7sDeMQHgLjauaEML1BdOl1qje29dIKGwKaGa_gxVq62k0k46nXxTdd6JFbnc5B0zlUcLBZuSjEGleseZ0OaDOfqLDzACmInhRE_0tBKthfH6-e7HOpCQYSLlGINH2wmSbLSuESM4TxMq-RqRS3U39b0xHExk70FTwoGrPZLZIvkSTECvodXdr5nN2Z4eJrZviWBBLp4l7B86x1fxSQ_vDpIyFgfPQ_BPUYbrSptiOnJe3D3ur7ZXhCiGtln2bj-glYcSfF
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Wiley_OA刊
  dbid: 24P
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fb9QwDI5gSIgXxG8K25RJCJ7KenXSJrxtaNOENJgEk_YWJWm6IXHtab098N9jJ70eJwbisYmvauP4_DW2PzP2RjiYtZXVeatCmQsrQo6fQW1eNF5qX-pWO4ronn6uTs7Fpwt5MWZVUi1M4oeYDtzIMuL_NRm4dcP-mjS0HxbivazgLrtHlbWUzleKs_X5itREjkW95Qopc_SCasU9W5T7qx9veKNI2n8b0vwzYfJ3IBs90fEj9nCEkPwg6fwxuxO6J-z-6Rgkf8rmKZCLPokvRi1wG_si8mXPU-HjT972fYPD9Fg8AU9O_U2afv6BH_A1wTNPxS28b_k8nScO3HYNj8Hu7nJ4xs6Pj759PMnHrgq5l1BDDt4RBgBRA-rCI0BpgLqo4wXlfEIoXenqVig0Tlc0hUUTb5QAobQvVGvhOdvq-i68ZFzomZfS1hbA0-10bV3ZKCddCGBnImPvVqtr_Eg5Tp0vfphEllwa0oNBPWRsb5JcJJqNW2QOSUHTPBFjx4H--tKMdmaEVw60LIiXTtR2plupqlBpHMV3bqqMba_Ua0ZrHQyCQkQpGgCn96ZptDMKntgu9DdRRlFhbqX_JVMh4IZK1hl7kXbM9LSAnkXhImas3thLG6-zOdN9v4p83wohI37GZ-xt3HV_XSDz5esZ4mF49b-Cr9mDkqo5YiLSNttaXt-EHcRYS7cbjekXs5Uibw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
Title Assessing physical access to healthy food across United Kingdom: A systematic review of measures and findings
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fosp4.563
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388348
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2646149336
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2648064769
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2660993657
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8976549
https://doaj.org/article/4c8b3950367047a19f586e698b3153d6
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwED-xTgJeEAwYGaMyEoKnsDT-iM0L2tCmCWmjAibtLfJXNiSadGv3sP-es-O2VIw9xrYi2-fz_Xxn_w7gHTN01Ait8kb6Mmea-RyPQU1eOMuVLVWjTIjonpyK4zP29ZyfJ4fbLF2rXOyJcaN2nQ0-8j003GhJ8PgtPk-v8pA1KkRXUwqNDdjELVjKAWweHJ6Ov6-8LFwFiqwF62xR7nWzKfvIBV2zQ5Gu_y6M-e9Vyb8hbLRBR0_hSQKPZL-X9jN44NsteJTymF_ebsHDkxQqfw6TPpyLlolMkyyIjtkRybwj_fPHW9J0ncPi0EXSw08Sspy4bvKJ7JMVzTPpn7iQriGT3qs4I7p1JIa824vZCzg7Ovz55ThPuRVyy2lFc2pNQAKUVRQlYhGmOBpyqeNHuPlJfWlKUzVMooqawhUaFd1JRplUtpCNpi9h0HatfwWEqZHlXFeaUht-pyptSicNN95TPWIZfFjMdG0T8XjIf_G77imTyzrIpEaZZPB22XLak23c0eYgCGtZH-ixY0F3fVEnbauZlYYqXgR2OlbpkWq4FF4oLMUxO5HB7kLUddLZWb1aYdiPZTVqWwih6NZ3N7GNDM9zhbqvjUDYTQWvMtjuV8-ytxTti8RJzKBaW1drw1mvaX9dRtZvicARD_MZvI8r8L8TVH_7MUZUTHfuH-NreFyGlxzxEtIuDObXN_4N4qu5GcJGycbDpErD6KX4A1xPJ98
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxEB6VVKJcEJRXoICReJy23fi1NhJCLbRqaRMqaKXeFtvrbZHIbmhSofwpfiPjfSRElN56jG1tbM_YM_Z4vg_gJbesl0ujo1x5GnHDfYTHoDyKMye0ozrXNkR0-wO5e8w_nYiTJfjd5sKEZ5Xtnlht1Fnpwh35BhputCR4_JbvRz-jwBoVoqsthUatFvt--guPbON3ex9Rvq8o3dk--rAbNawCkRMsYRFzNthAxhOGfXFooDMWWMTxR3jzyDy11CY5V6icNs5igyqeKc640i5WuWH43RuwzJmMaQeWt7YHh1_mtzpCB0iuFuU2phvleMTXhWQLdq-iB7jMp_33aebfLnNl83buwO3GWSWbtXbdhSVfrMJKw5t-Nl2Fm_0mNH8PhnX4GC0hGTWyJ6ZiYySTktTpllOSl2WGxaGLpHZ3SWBVycrhW7JJ5rDSpE6pIWVOhvUt5piYIiNViL04Hd-H42uZ9QfQKcrCPwLCdc8JYRLDmAuf04mxNFNWWO-Z6fEuvGlnOnUN0Hng2_iR1hDNNA0ySVEmXXgxazmqwT0uabMVhDWrD3DcVUF5fpo2qzvlTlmmRRzQ8HhiejoXSnqpsRTHnMkurLWiTps9YpzONRr7MavG1R1CNqbw5UXVRoV0YKmvaiPRzWdSJF14WGvPrLcM7ZnCSexCsqBXC8NZrCm-n1Uo4wodVcHxf19XGvjfCUo_fz1EL5w9vnqMz2Fl96h_kB7sDfafwC0askiqB1Br0JmcX_in6NtN7LNmQRH4dt1r-A_U3V-C
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwED-NThq8IBhfhQFG4uMpNI3txEZCaGOrNsbKBEzaW7AdZ0OiSVk7of5r_HXc5aOlYuxtj7Wt1Pbd-c6-u98BPBeW9_PY6CBXPgqEET7Aa1AehJmT2kU615Y8ugfDePdIfDiWxyvwu82FobDK9kysDuqsdPRG3kPFjZoEr99xL2_CIg63B-_GPwOqIEWe1racRs0i-372C69vk7d720jrF1E02Pn6fjdoKgwETvKEB9xZ0odcJBzn5VBZZ5wqiuMPin_kPrKRTXKhkFFtmIUG2T1TggulXahyw_G712A1oVtRB1a3doaHnxcvPFITPFeLeBtGvXIyFq9lzJd0YFUq4CL79t8wzb_N50r_DW7BzcZwZZs1p92GFV-sw_WmhvrpbB3WDho3_R0Y1a5k1Ips3PABM1VlRjYtWZ16OWN5WWbYTFNktenLqMJKVo7esE22gJhmdXoNK3M2ql80J8wUGavc7cXJ5C4cXcmu34NOURb-ATCh-05KkxjOHX1OJ8ZGmbLSes9NX3ThVbvTqWtAz6n2xo-0hmuOUqJJijTpwrP5yHEN9HHBmC0i1ryfoLmrhvLsJG0kPRVOWa5lSMh4IjF9nUsV-1hjK645i7uw0ZI6bc6LSbrgbpzHvBslndw3pvDleTVGUWpwrC8bE6PJz2OZdOF-zT3z2XLUbQo3sQvJEl8tLWe5p_h-WiGOKzRapcD_fVlx4H83KP305RAtcv7w8jU-hTWU3fTj3nD_EdyIKKGkioXagM707Nw_RjNvap808sTg21WL8B9YhGO3
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing+physical+access+to+healthy+food+across+United+Kingdom%3A+A+systematic+review+of+measures+and+findings&rft.jtitle=Obesity+science+%26+practice&rft.au=Titis%2C+Elzbieta&rft.au=Procter%2C+Rob&rft.au=Walasek%2C+Lukasz&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.issn=2055-2238&rft.eissn=2055-2238&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fosp4.563&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2055-2238&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2055-2238&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2055-2238&client=summon