A shoe sole-based apparatus and method for randomly perturbing the stance phase of gait: Test–retest reliability in young adults

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics Vol. 45; no. 10; pp. 1850 - 1853
• Main Authors: Kim, Hogene, Ashton-Miller, James A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 26.06.2012; Elsevier; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Accidental Falls - prevention & control; Adult; Application programming interface; Biological and medical sciences; Biomechanical Phenomena; Confidence intervals; Female; Foot - physiology; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gait; Gait - physiology; Humans; Male; Models, Biological; Perturbation; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Response; Shoes; Step kinematics; Studies; Underfoot; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports; Walking; Walking - physiology; Response; Step kinematics; Perturbation; Gait; Underfoot; Human; Exploration; Method; Shoe; Biomechanics; Sole; Young adult; Kinematics; Reliability; Biomedical engineering
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.003
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380

Walking on an irregular surface is associated with an elevated risk for a fall at any age. Yet, relatively little is known about how a human responds to an unexpected underfoot perturbation during gait. This is partly due to the difficulty of generating an intermittent but repeatable, unexpected, underfoot perturbation whose size and location are precisely known. So we developed a shoe sole-embedded apparatus for randomly perturbing the stance phase of gait. Medial and lateral flaps were concealed in the soles of pairs of sandals, along with their actuators. Either flap could be deployed within 400ms in the parasagittal plane under a swing foot; this altered the resulting sagittal and frontal plane orientations of the foot during the next stance phase, whereafter the flap was retracted following toe-off for the rest of that gait trial. We tested six healthy young subjects by randomly presenting a single medial or lateral perturbation in 12 of 30 gait trials. Traditional step kinematic measures were used to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the response to the stimulus at two different walking speeds in 60 randomized trials conducted 1 week apart. The method was effective in systematically inducing an alteration in gait, reproducible across visits, as evidenced by acceptable intraclass correlation coefficients for step width, time and length. We conclude that the apparatus and method has potential for measuring the ability of humans to reject one or more unexpected underfoot perturbations during gait.