Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Men

Purpose We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Materials and Methods Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of urology Vol. 194; no. 1; pp. 65 - 72
Main Authors de la Calle, Claire, Patil, Dattatraya, Wei, John T, Scherr, Douglas S, Sokoll, Lori, Chan, Daniel W, Siddiqui, Javed, Mosquera, Juan Miguel, Rubin, Mark A, Sanda, Martin G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Materials and Methods Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less). Results In the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions The PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies.
AbstractList We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less). In the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort. The PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Purpose We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Materials and Methods Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less). Results In the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions The PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies.
We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population.PURPOSEWe evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population.Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less).MATERIALS AND METHODSTwo independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less).In the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort.RESULTSIn the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort.The PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies.CONCLUSIONSThe PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Author Sokoll, Lori
Mosquera, Juan Miguel
Sanda, Martin G
Patil, Dattatraya
Wei, John T
Chan, Daniel W
de la Calle, Claire
Siddiqui, Javed
Rubin, Mark A
Scherr, Douglas S
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: de la Calle, Claire
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Patil, Dattatraya
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Wei, John T
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Scherr, Douglas S
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Sokoll, Lori
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Chan, Daniel W
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Siddiqui, Javed
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Mosquera, Juan Miguel
– sequence: 9
  fullname: Rubin, Mark A
– sequence: 10
  fullname: Sanda, Martin G
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ks1uEzEUhS1URH_gBVggL9kkXNvxTCyhSiUUWqkFJGBtOZ47icPETm1PRJ6Kh-DF8JBSlS668sLnnGuf7x6TAx88EvKSwZgBq96sxqs-hjEHJsfAxqDYE3LEJK9Holb8gBwBcD6SYlIfkuOUVgBsImv-jBxyWYmqkuqIrK_7LjuLPmOk51vT9Sa74GloaV4i_RJDyiYjvUDT5SW99A3-pDnQ95jRZnq2WERMyW3vSWfG2xLmPH3nwibt6Cfz-1cRXKN_Tp62pkv44vY8Id8_nH-bXYyuPn-8nJ1djawUVR7ZlplaWQZGogGOkislJNRCtKLhCnnbzhVgM5_W0xo41LVioCxK1tpq2ihxQk73uZt-vsZm-F40nd5EtzZxp4Nx-v8b75Z6EbZ6UqkKJqIEvL4NiOGmx5T12iWLXWc8hj5pVingjEsxSF_dn3U35F_HRcD3AlsaShHbOwkDPYDUKz2A1ANIDUwXkMU0fWCyLv9FU97rusetb_dWLA1vHUadrMPCpHGxMNNNcI_bTx_Ybee8s6b7gTtMq9BHX9hpphPXoL8OSzbsGJNlv6ZiIv4AMHfP-g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajur_2018_11_007
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_020_0356_2
crossref_primary_10_1515_cclm_2019_0693
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaoncol_2024_0455
crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13676
crossref_primary_10_2147_RRU_S240171
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2016_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_10251_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2023_117270
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2021_06_010
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep35364
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40164_023_00444_9
crossref_primary_10_1177_17562872221103988
crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_8730608
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2016_07_001
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13148_019_0716_z
crossref_primary_10_26442_18151434_2021_2_200959
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13235932
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11912_021_01118_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_pros_23382
crossref_primary_10_1002_bco2_91
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2016_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41973_024_00258_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13071611
crossref_primary_10_1097_01_JAA_0000521148_78442_d5
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_021_00928_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2015_04_039
crossref_primary_10_1002_pros_24182
crossref_primary_10_17650_1726_9776_2020_16_2_65_73
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11070664
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2016_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11912_016_0513_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_9153
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_022_00507_8
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_024_00840_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40618_020_01294_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2017_02_017
crossref_primary_10_1158_1055_9965_EPI_20_1104
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14174174
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_024_03508_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13277_015_4619_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2019_10_039
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2024_102063
crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_20200395
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_seminoncol_2017_02_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_1849454417720151
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24032185
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41571_020_0332_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_019_02367_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2017_07_030
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biotechadv_2016_11_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2016_10_125
crossref_primary_10_1080_10408363_2022_2033161
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000382
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000384
crossref_primary_10_17709_2410_1893_2021_8_4_10
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2020_03_005
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_1068893
crossref_primary_10_1177_1756287221997186
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prnil_2018_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13195
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semcancer_2018_01_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2023_10_029
crossref_primary_10_2217_fon_15_203
crossref_primary_10_1038_pcan_2016_72
crossref_primary_10_1177_0391560319865724
crossref_primary_10_3233_BLC_230057
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000316
crossref_primary_10_25557_2310_0435_2018_01_4_10
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms18030488
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_019_0178_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12123790
crossref_primary_10_1080_23808993_2020_1804866
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euros_2022_10_017
crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_9872146
crossref_primary_10_5534_wjmh_230386
crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_70024
crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13762
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_6051_21_04098_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2017_12_028
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_911725
crossref_primary_10_11124_JBISRIR_D_19_00194
crossref_primary_10_1101_cshperspect_a030601
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02889_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12061550
crossref_primary_10_48083_KDCK6642
crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_20200084
crossref_primary_10_1136_medethics_2019_105979
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2017_04_02
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2020_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2023_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2018_06_016
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_021_00367_8
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2024_14770
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13133373
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_021_00432_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2016_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1002_pros_24692
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2020_07_004
crossref_primary_10_1177_1557988320919626
crossref_primary_10_5213_inj_1632724_362
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20071637
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2023_08_011
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrclinonc_2016_11
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_017_0008_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2015_12_004
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics10090656
crossref_primary_10_36384_01232576_563
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2024_05_011
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.055
10.1515/cclm-2012-0410
10.1111/bju.12318
10.1002/pros.20872
10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.032
10.1056/NEJMoa031918
10.1002/sim.1563
10.1002/sim.2459
10.1056/NEJMoa1113135
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.011
10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.121
10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.072
10.1001/jama.279.19.1542
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<313::AID-SIM370>3.0.CO;2-K
10.1016/j.trsl.2014.06.006
10.1111/bju.12907
10.1373/clinchem.2012.195560
10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459
10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.056
10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.015
10.1371/journal.pone.0067687
10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.003
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
– notice: 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1527-3792
EndPage 72
ExternalDocumentID PMC4696043
25636659
10_1016_j_juro_2015_01_091
S0022534715001834
1_s2_0_S0022534715001834
Genre Multicenter Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: JHU BRL
  grantid: CA115102; 5U01 CA111275-09; U24CA115102
– fundername: Emory EDRN Clinical Validation Center
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 CA006973
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: U01 CA113913
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: CA115102
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: 5U01 CA111275-09
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: U01 CA111275
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: U24CA115102
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: U24 CA115102
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.55
.GJ
.XZ
08P
0R~
123
1B1
1CY
354
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
AAAAV
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAKAS
AALRI
AAMOA
AAQFI
AAQKA
AAQQT
AAQXK
AASCR
AASXQ
AAXUO
ABASU
ABCQX
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABVCZ
ABWVN
ACGFS
ACIJW
ACILI
ACLDA
ACOAL
ACRPL
ACXJB
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADMUD
ADNKB
ADNMO
ADPAM
ADZCM
AEBDS
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFFNX
AFTRI
AFUWQ
AGHFR
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AI.
AINUH
AITUG
AIZYK
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AMRAJ
ASGHL
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BCGUY
BELOY
BYPQX
C45
C5W
CS3
DIWNM
DU5
EBS
EEVPB
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F5P
FCALG
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
GNXGY
GQDEL
HLJTE
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
IH2
IHE
IKREB
IKYAY
IPNFZ
J5H
KMI
L7B
M41
MJL
MO0
N4W
NQ-
NTWIH
O9-
OAG
OAH
OB3
OBH
ODMTH
OGROG
OHH
OL1
OVD
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWY
OWZ
P2P
PKN
QTD
R2-
RIG
RLZ
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SSZ
TEORI
TSPGW
UDS
UNMZH
UV1
VH1
VVN
WOW
X7M
XH2
XYM
YFH
YOC
ZCG
ZFV
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
ZZMQN
AGZHU
AHPSJ
ALXNB
ZA5
AAYXX
ABPXF
ABXYN
ABZZY
ACVFH
ACZKN
ADCNI
ADGHP
AFBFQ
AFNMH
AGQPQ
AHQVU
AIGII
AOQMC
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ADSXY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-cf1a79c10a5ea02e5299350733f3d29e2ffb90edb8787020779109ce51fc68d93
ISSN 0022-5347
1527-3792
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 13:14:02 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 00:21:23 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:27:14 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:30:35 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:27 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:30:54 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:52 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords digital rectal examination
nomograms
prostate specific antigen
PCa
PHI
prostate cancer
Prostate Health Index
Early Detection Research Network
DRE
prostatic neoplasms
fPSA
biopsy
[−2]proPSA serum isoform
prostate
EDRN
free PSA
p2PSA
prostate-specific antigen
PSA
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c536t-cf1a79c10a5ea02e5299350733f3d29e2ffb90edb8787020779109ce51fc68d93
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMID 25636659
PQID 1690212533
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4696043
proquest_miscellaneous_1690212533
pubmed_primary_25636659
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2015_01_091
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_juro_2015_01_091
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_juro_2015_01_091
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0022534715001834
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The Journal of urology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Urol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Glass, Cowan, Fuldeore (bib2) 2013; 82
Abrate, Lazzeri, Lughezzani (bib14) 2015; 115
Catalona, Partin, Sanda (bib7) 2011; 185
Le, Griffin, Loeb (bib9) 2010; 183
Zhou, Qin (bib21) 2005; 24
American Cancer Society®: Prostate Cancer, 2014. Available at
Gönen (bib18) 2007
Loeb, Sanda, Broyles (bib27) 2015; 193
Catalona, Partin, Slawin (bib8) 1998; 279
Carter (bib22) 2013; 112
Schröder, Hugosson, Roobol (bib3) 2012; 366
Sokoll, Chan, Klee (bib16) 2012; 413
Loeb, Vellekoop, Ahmed (bib5) 2013; 64
Sokoll, Wang, Feng (bib10) 2008; 180
Accessed June 8, 2014.
Ferro, Bruzzese, Perdona (bib25) 2013; 8
Zlotta, Nam (bib6) 2012; 61
Qin, Hsu, Zhou (bib17) 2006; 25
Jansen, van Schaik, Kurstjens (bib26) 2010; 57
Platt, Hanley, Yang (bib19) 2000; 19
Pepe (bib20) 2003
Moyer (bib23) 2012; 157
Lazzeri, Haese, de la Taille (bib15) 2013; 63
Thompson, Pauler, Goodman (bib4) 2004; 350
Bruzzese, Mazzarella, Ferro (bib13) 2014; 164
Stephan, Jung, Semjonow (bib11) 2013; 59
Stephan, Kahrs, Cammann (bib24) 2009; 69
Filella, Gimenez (bib12) 2013; 51
10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib1
Qin (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib17) 2006; 25
Loeb (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib27) 2015; 193
Le (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib9) 2010; 183
Bruzzese (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib13) 2014; 164
Stephan (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib24) 2009; 69
Schröder (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib3) 2012; 366
Glass (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib2) 2013; 82
Moyer (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib23) 2012; 157
Lazzeri (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib15) 2013; 63
Filella (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib12) 2013; 51
Zlotta (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib6) 2012; 61
Carter (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib22) 2013; 112
Thompson (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib4) 2004; 350
Catalona (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib7) 2011; 185
Pepe (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib20) 2003
Jansen (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib26) 2010; 57
Catalona (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib8) 1998; 279
Zhou (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib21) 2005; 24
Loeb (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib5) 2013; 64
Stephan (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib11) 2013; 59
Abrate (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib14) 2015; 115
Ferro (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib25) 2013; 8
Platt (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib19) 2000; 19
Sokoll (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib10) 2008; 180
Sokoll (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib16) 2012; 413
Gönen (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib18) 2007
References_xml – volume: 25
  start-page: 3487
  year: 2006
  ident: bib17
  article-title: New confidence intervals for the difference between two sensitivities at a fixed level of specificity
  publication-title: Stat Med
– reference: . Accessed June 8, 2014.
– volume: 63
  start-page: 986
  year: 2013
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 64
  start-page: 876
  year: 2013
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 465
  year: 2005
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test
  publication-title: Stat Med
– volume: 59
  start-page: 280
  year: 2013
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Comparative assessment of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion with the serum [-2]proprostate-specific antigen-based prostate health index for detection of prostate cancer
  publication-title: Clin Chem
– volume: 112
  start-page: 543
  year: 2013
  ident: bib22
  article-title: American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 180
  start-page: 539
  year: 2008
  ident: bib10
  article-title: [-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection: a national cancer institute early detection research network validation study
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 115
  start-page: 537
  year: 2015
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Clinical performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) for the prediction of prostate cancer in obese men: data from the PROMEtheuS project, a multicentre European prospective study
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 164
  start-page: 444
  year: 2014
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Prostate health index vs %free prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in men with “gray” prostate-specific antigen levels at first biopsy: systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Transl Res
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1115
  year: 2012
  ident: bib6
  article-title: To biopsy or not to biopsy—thou shall think twice
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 193
  start-page: 1163
  year: 2015
  ident: bib27
  article-title: The Prostate Health Index selectively identifies clinically significant prostate cancer
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 313
  year: 2000
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Bootstrap confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a quantitative diagnostic test
  publication-title: Stat Med
– volume: 51
  start-page: 729
  year: 2013
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med
– volume: 185
  start-page: 1650
  year: 2011
  ident: bib7
  article-title: A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range
  publication-title: J Urol
– year: 2007
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Analyzing Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves with SAS
– volume: 57
  start-page: 921
  year: 2010
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 350
  start-page: 2239
  year: 2004
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 279
  start-page: 1542
  year: 1998
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 69
  start-page: 198
  year: 2009
  ident: bib24
  article-title: A [-2]proPSA-based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases
  publication-title: Prostate
– year: 2003
  ident: bib20
  article-title: The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
– volume: 366
  start-page: 981
  year: 2012
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 183
  start-page: 1355
  year: 2010
  ident: bib9
  article-title: [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 82
  start-page: 60
  year: 2013
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Patient demographics, quality of life, and disease features of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: trends in the PSA era
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 413
  start-page: 1279
  year: 2012
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Multi-center analytical performance evaluation of the Access Hybritech(R) p2PSA immunoassay
  publication-title: Clin Chim Acta
– reference: American Cancer Society®: Prostate Cancer, 2014. Available at
– volume: 157
  start-page: 120
  year: 2012
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 8
  start-page: e67687
  year: 2013
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Prostate Health Index (Phi) and Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) significantly improve prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1115
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib6
  article-title: To biopsy or not to biopsy—thou shall think twice
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.055
– volume: 51
  start-page: 729
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib12
  article-title: Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med
  doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0410
– year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib20
– volume: 112
  start-page: 543
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib22
  article-title: American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.12318
– volume: 69
  start-page: 198
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib24
  article-title: A [-2]proPSA-based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases
  publication-title: Prostate
  doi: 10.1002/pros.20872
– volume: 180
  start-page: 539
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib10
  article-title: [-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection: a national cancer institute early detection research network validation study
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 185
  start-page: 1650
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib7
  article-title: A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.032
– volume: 350
  start-page: 2239
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib4
  article-title: Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031918
– volume: 24
  start-page: 465
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib21
  article-title: Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.1563
– volume: 25
  start-page: 3487
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib17
  article-title: New confidence intervals for the difference between two sensitivities at a fixed level of specificity
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.2459
– volume: 366
  start-page: 981
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib3
  article-title: Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135
– volume: 64
  start-page: 876
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib5
  article-title: Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049
– volume: 63
  start-page: 986
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib15
  article-title: Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.011
– year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib18
– volume: 193
  start-page: 1163
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib27
  article-title: The Prostate Health Index selectively identifies clinically significant prostate cancer
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.121
– volume: 82
  start-page: 60
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib2
  article-title: Patient demographics, quality of life, and disease features of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: trends in the PSA era
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.072
– volume: 279
  start-page: 1542
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib8
  article-title: Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1542
– volume: 19
  start-page: 313
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib19
  article-title: Bootstrap confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a quantitative diagnostic test
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<313::AID-SIM370>3.0.CO;2-K
– volume: 164
  start-page: 444
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib13
  article-title: Prostate health index vs %free prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in men with “gray” prostate-specific antigen levels at first biopsy: systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Transl Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.06.006
– volume: 115
  start-page: 537
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib14
  article-title: Clinical performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) for the prediction of prostate cancer in obese men: data from the PROMEtheuS project, a multicentre European prospective study
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.12907
– volume: 59
  start-page: 280
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib11
  article-title: Comparative assessment of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion with the serum [-2]proprostate-specific antigen-based prostate health index for detection of prostate cancer
  publication-title: Clin Chem
  doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.195560
– volume: 157
  start-page: 120
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib23
  article-title: Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459
– volume: 183
  start-page: 1355
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib9
  article-title: [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.056
– volume: 413
  start-page: 1279
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib16
  article-title: Multi-center analytical performance evaluation of the Access Hybritech(R) p2PSA immunoassay
  publication-title: Clin Chim Acta
  doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.015
– volume: 8
  start-page: e67687
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib25
  article-title: Prostate Health Index (Phi) and Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) significantly improve prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067687
– volume: 57
  start-page: 921
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib26
  article-title: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.003
– ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib1
SSID ssj0014572
Score 2.530086
Snippet Purpose We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Materials and...
We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Two independent prospective...
We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population.PURPOSEWe evaluated the...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 65
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Male
Mathematical Concepts
Middle Aged
nomograms
Prospective Studies
prostate
Prostate - pathology
prostate-specific antigen
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
prostatic neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms - blood
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Urology
Title Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Men
URI https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0022534715001834
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636659
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1690212533
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4696043
Volume 194
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6FVkJcEG_CS4vELXJk7_oRH0OgFESrSKSot9V6vS6JUidKnEP5Pdz5EfwxZrzrVwsV9BJFzjprZ77MzHq_-YaQN8nI85nytQPhIHZ8JhP0g8qRLOFhAojSpUjS0XF4eOJ_Og1Oe70fLdbSrkiG6vsf60puYlU4BnbFKtn_sGz9pXAA3oN94RUsDK__ZOOyehbplcjUqGW7q23_KRZ0QCpZlRp9RGFEzDXfadw5GIzPyrU2UofqoRMEATLUsUnlensB3rfcSj_AHkW2amzRAKyVzu42nQf0qR4sJVZ-GbryZClbNNspXOfSMOoLmHYjL5rgoOcVQ3gwGzbbRKgg2Ur4B1-G7ecVXlBzW9v1AwE3OptDbd0uQ1cXd_2y6X7cAaDxsqa7hI3XpvPPlUhgHkoshgu4fWTwGXVW0xmsBY31eYkNSPx4GFpt8q7-9vRo4ocoYcNvkX0GixHwpvsf3n7-Oq53q_wgqlXp8c5scZbhEV6-AJSftrP9LRe6uta5TNlt5UCze-SutTYdGyTeJz2dPyC3jyw94yE5bwGSNoCkq4wCIGmFMmoASUtA0mJFDSBpA8hmqAEknefUAJIey18_YQCA8RE5OXg_mxw6tp-HowIeFo7KPBnFynNloKXLdACpEA-wa2jGUxZrlmVJ7Oo0GWEUYW4UQS4bKx14mQpHacwfk718leunhPJIhSlzR5EMpJ9KT3LGFUNtvTRLNU_7xKt-WaGs2D32XFmKitW4EGgYgYYRrifAMH0yqM9ZG6mXa0dHlcFEVcQMYVdvrX_YCk9smXAF0iEYogKWXi4EUL9PgvpMm-aa9FUAdq-d8XWFCwExADf2ZK5XO5gpjLFTA6zc-uSJwUl9BxXW4Ho7CKoHoL5895N8_q3Umbewf3bjM5-TO40HeEH2is1Ov4Qcvkhe2b_QbxHJ8xc
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter+Evaluation+of+the+Prostate+Health+Index+to+Detect+Aggressive+Prostate+Cancer+in+Biopsy+Na%C3%AFve+Men&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+urology&rft.au=de+la+Calle%2C+Claire&rft.au=Patil%2C+Dattatraya&rft.au=Wei%2C+John+T.&rft.au=Scherr%2C+Douglas+S.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.issn=0022-5347&rft.eissn=1527-3792&rft.volume=194&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=72&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.juro.2015.01.091&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25636659&rft.externalDocID=PMC4696043
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00225347%2FS0022534714X00078%2Fcov150h.gif