Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Men
Purpose We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Materials and Methods Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different cl...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of urology Vol. 194; no. 1; pp. 65 - 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.07.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Materials and Methods Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less). Results In the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions The PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population.
Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less).
In the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort.
The PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies. Purpose We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Materials and Methods Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less). Results In the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions The PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies. We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population.PURPOSEWe evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population.Two independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less).MATERIALS AND METHODSTwo independent prospective cohorts of 561 and 395 subjects, respectively, with no prior prostate biopsy who were enrolled at different clinical sites were used to validate the results. We compared the diagnostic specificity of PHI to prebiopsy total and percent free prostate specific antigen using prostate biopsy results. We also determined the optimal PHI threshold to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater) from indolent or no prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or less).In the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort.RESULTSIn the primary cohort higher PHI values were significantly associated with Gleason score 7 or greater. The AUC to detect aggressive prostate cancer was 0.815. At 95% sensitivity PHI specificity was 36.0% vs 17.2% and 19.4% for total and percent free prostate specific antigen, respectively. At 95% sensitivity for detecting aggressive prostate cancer the optimal PHI cutoff was 24, which would help avoid 41% of unnecessary biopsies. A cutoff of 24 led to 36% biopsies avoided with few aggressive cancers missed. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort.The PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies.CONCLUSIONSThe PHI detected aggressive prostate cancer with better specificity than total and percent free prostate specific antigen in a biopsy naïve population. It could be a useful tool to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies. |
Author | Sokoll, Lori Mosquera, Juan Miguel Sanda, Martin G Patil, Dattatraya Wei, John T Chan, Daniel W de la Calle, Claire Siddiqui, Javed Rubin, Mark A Scherr, Douglas S |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: de la Calle, Claire – sequence: 2 fullname: Patil, Dattatraya – sequence: 3 fullname: Wei, John T – sequence: 4 fullname: Scherr, Douglas S – sequence: 5 fullname: Sokoll, Lori – sequence: 6 fullname: Chan, Daniel W – sequence: 7 fullname: Siddiqui, Javed – sequence: 8 fullname: Mosquera, Juan Miguel – sequence: 9 fullname: Rubin, Mark A – sequence: 10 fullname: Sanda, Martin G |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ks1uEzEUhS1URH_gBVggL9kkXNvxTCyhSiUUWqkFJGBtOZ47icPETm1PRJ6Kh-DF8JBSlS668sLnnGuf7x6TAx88EvKSwZgBq96sxqs-hjEHJsfAxqDYE3LEJK9Holb8gBwBcD6SYlIfkuOUVgBsImv-jBxyWYmqkuqIrK_7LjuLPmOk51vT9Sa74GloaV4i_RJDyiYjvUDT5SW99A3-pDnQ95jRZnq2WERMyW3vSWfG2xLmPH3nwibt6Cfz-1cRXKN_Tp62pkv44vY8Id8_nH-bXYyuPn-8nJ1djawUVR7ZlplaWQZGogGOkislJNRCtKLhCnnbzhVgM5_W0xo41LVioCxK1tpq2ihxQk73uZt-vsZm-F40nd5EtzZxp4Nx-v8b75Z6EbZ6UqkKJqIEvL4NiOGmx5T12iWLXWc8hj5pVingjEsxSF_dn3U35F_HRcD3AlsaShHbOwkDPYDUKz2A1ANIDUwXkMU0fWCyLv9FU97rusetb_dWLA1vHUadrMPCpHGxMNNNcI_bTx_Ybee8s6b7gTtMq9BHX9hpphPXoL8OSzbsGJNlv6ZiIv4AMHfP-g |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajur_2018_11_007 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_020_0356_2 crossref_primary_10_1515_cclm_2019_0693 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaoncol_2024_0455 crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13676 crossref_primary_10_2147_RRU_S240171 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2016_09_006 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_10251_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2023_117270 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2021_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1038_srep35364 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40164_023_00444_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562872221103988 crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_8730608 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2016_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13148_019_0716_z crossref_primary_10_26442_18151434_2021_2_200959 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13235932 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11912_021_01118_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_pros_23382 crossref_primary_10_1002_bco2_91 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2016_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41973_024_00258_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13071611 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_JAA_0000521148_78442_d5 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_021_00928_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2015_04_039 crossref_primary_10_1002_pros_24182 crossref_primary_10_17650_1726_9776_2020_16_2_65_73 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11070664 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2016_05_003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11912_016_0513_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_9153 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_022_00507_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_024_00840_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40618_020_01294_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2017_02_017 crossref_primary_10_1158_1055_9965_EPI_20_1104 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14174174 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_024_03508_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13277_015_4619_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2019_10_039 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2024_102063 crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_20200395 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_seminoncol_2017_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_1849454417720151 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24032185 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41571_020_0332_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_019_02367_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2017_07_030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biotechadv_2016_11_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2016_10_125 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408363_2022_2033161 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000382 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000384 crossref_primary_10_17709_2410_1893_2021_8_4_10 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2020_03_005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_1068893 crossref_primary_10_1177_1756287221997186 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prnil_2018_02_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13195 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semcancer_2018_01_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2023_10_029 crossref_primary_10_2217_fon_15_203 crossref_primary_10_1038_pcan_2016_72 crossref_primary_10_1177_0391560319865724 crossref_primary_10_3233_BLC_230057 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000316 crossref_primary_10_25557_2310_0435_2018_01_4_10 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms18030488 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_019_0178_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12123790 crossref_primary_10_1080_23808993_2020_1804866 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euros_2022_10_017 crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_9872146 crossref_primary_10_5534_wjmh_230386 crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_70024 crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_13762 crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_6051_21_04098_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2017_12_028 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_911725 crossref_primary_10_11124_JBISRIR_D_19_00194 crossref_primary_10_1101_cshperspect_a030601 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02889_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12061550 crossref_primary_10_48083_KDCK6642 crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_20200084 crossref_primary_10_1136_medethics_2019_105979 crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2017_04_02 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2020_03_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2023_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2018_06_016 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_021_00367_8 crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2024_14770 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13133373 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_021_00432_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2016_03_009 crossref_primary_10_1002_pros_24692 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2020_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1177_1557988320919626 crossref_primary_10_5213_inj_1632724_362 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20071637 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2023_08_011 crossref_primary_10_1038_nrclinonc_2016_11 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_017_0008_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2015_12_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics10090656 crossref_primary_10_36384_01232576_563 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2024_05_011 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.055 10.1515/cclm-2012-0410 10.1111/bju.12318 10.1002/pros.20872 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.032 10.1056/NEJMoa031918 10.1002/sim.1563 10.1002/sim.2459 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.011 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.121 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.072 10.1001/jama.279.19.1542 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<313::AID-SIM370>3.0.CO;2-K 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.06.006 10.1111/bju.12907 10.1373/clinchem.2012.195560 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.056 10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.015 10.1371/journal.pone.0067687 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.003 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. – notice: 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1527-3792 |
EndPage | 72 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4696043 25636659 10_1016_j_juro_2015_01_091 S0022534715001834 1_s2_0_S0022534715001834 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: JHU BRL grantid: CA115102; 5U01 CA111275-09; U24CA115102 – fundername: Emory EDRN Clinical Validation Center – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: P30 CA006973 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: U01 CA113913 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: CA115102 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: 5U01 CA111275-09 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: U01 CA111275 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: U24CA115102 – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: U24 CA115102 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .55 .GJ .XZ 08P 0R~ 123 1B1 1CY 354 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAAAV AAEDT AAEDW AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAKAS AALRI AAMOA AAQFI AAQKA AAQQT AAQXK AASCR AASXQ AAXUO ABASU ABCQX ABDIG ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABPPZ ABVCZ ABWVN ACGFS ACIJW ACILI ACLDA ACOAL ACRPL ACXJB ADGGA ADHPY ADMUD ADNKB ADNMO ADPAM ADZCM AEBDS AEETU AENEX AFDTB AFEXH AFFNX AFTRI AFUWQ AGHFR AHOMT AHQNM AHRYX AHVBC AI. AINUH AITUG AIZYK AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJZMW AKCTQ AKULP ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AMRAJ ASGHL ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BCGUY BELOY BYPQX C45 C5W CS3 DIWNM DU5 EBS EEVPB EJD ERAAH EX3 F5P FCALG FDB FEDTE FGOYB GBLVA GNXGY GQDEL HLJTE HVGLF HZ~ H~9 IH2 IHE IKREB IKYAY IPNFZ J5H KMI L7B M41 MJL MO0 N4W NQ- NTWIH O9- OAG OAH OB3 OBH ODMTH OGROG OHH OL1 OVD OWU OWV OWW OWY OWZ P2P PKN QTD R2- RIG RLZ ROL RPZ SEL SES SJN SSZ TEORI TSPGW UDS UNMZH UV1 VH1 VVN WOW X7M XH2 XYM YFH YOC ZCG ZFV ZGI ZXP ZY1 ZZMQN AGZHU AHPSJ ALXNB ZA5 AAYXX ABPXF ABXYN ABZZY ACVFH ACZKN ADCNI ADGHP AFBFQ AFNMH AGQPQ AHQVU AIGII AOQMC CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ADSXY |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-cf1a79c10a5ea02e5299350733f3d29e2ffb90edb8787020779109ce51fc68d93 |
ISSN | 0022-5347 1527-3792 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 13:14:02 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:21:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:27:14 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:30:35 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:27 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:30:54 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:52 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | digital rectal examination nomograms prostate specific antigen PCa PHI prostate cancer Prostate Health Index Early Detection Research Network DRE prostatic neoplasms fPSA biopsy [−2]proPSA serum isoform prostate EDRN free PSA p2PSA prostate-specific antigen PSA |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c536t-cf1a79c10a5ea02e5299350733f3d29e2ffb90edb8787020779109ce51fc68d93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 25636659 |
PQID | 1690212533 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4696043 proquest_miscellaneous_1690212533 pubmed_primary_25636659 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2015_01_091 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_juro_2015_01_091 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_juro_2015_01_091 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0022534715001834 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2015 text: 2015-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of urology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Urol |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Glass, Cowan, Fuldeore (bib2) 2013; 82 Abrate, Lazzeri, Lughezzani (bib14) 2015; 115 Catalona, Partin, Sanda (bib7) 2011; 185 Le, Griffin, Loeb (bib9) 2010; 183 Zhou, Qin (bib21) 2005; 24 American Cancer Society®: Prostate Cancer, 2014. Available at Gönen (bib18) 2007 Loeb, Sanda, Broyles (bib27) 2015; 193 Catalona, Partin, Slawin (bib8) 1998; 279 Carter (bib22) 2013; 112 Schröder, Hugosson, Roobol (bib3) 2012; 366 Sokoll, Chan, Klee (bib16) 2012; 413 Loeb, Vellekoop, Ahmed (bib5) 2013; 64 Sokoll, Wang, Feng (bib10) 2008; 180 Accessed June 8, 2014. Ferro, Bruzzese, Perdona (bib25) 2013; 8 Zlotta, Nam (bib6) 2012; 61 Qin, Hsu, Zhou (bib17) 2006; 25 Jansen, van Schaik, Kurstjens (bib26) 2010; 57 Platt, Hanley, Yang (bib19) 2000; 19 Pepe (bib20) 2003 Moyer (bib23) 2012; 157 Lazzeri, Haese, de la Taille (bib15) 2013; 63 Thompson, Pauler, Goodman (bib4) 2004; 350 Bruzzese, Mazzarella, Ferro (bib13) 2014; 164 Stephan, Jung, Semjonow (bib11) 2013; 59 Stephan, Kahrs, Cammann (bib24) 2009; 69 Filella, Gimenez (bib12) 2013; 51 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib1 Qin (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib17) 2006; 25 Loeb (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib27) 2015; 193 Le (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib9) 2010; 183 Bruzzese (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib13) 2014; 164 Stephan (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib24) 2009; 69 Schröder (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib3) 2012; 366 Glass (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib2) 2013; 82 Moyer (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib23) 2012; 157 Lazzeri (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib15) 2013; 63 Filella (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib12) 2013; 51 Zlotta (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib6) 2012; 61 Carter (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib22) 2013; 112 Thompson (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib4) 2004; 350 Catalona (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib7) 2011; 185 Pepe (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib20) 2003 Jansen (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib26) 2010; 57 Catalona (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib8) 1998; 279 Zhou (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib21) 2005; 24 Loeb (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib5) 2013; 64 Stephan (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib11) 2013; 59 Abrate (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib14) 2015; 115 Ferro (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib25) 2013; 8 Platt (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib19) 2000; 19 Sokoll (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib10) 2008; 180 Sokoll (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib16) 2012; 413 Gönen (10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib18) 2007 |
References_xml | – volume: 25 start-page: 3487 year: 2006 ident: bib17 article-title: New confidence intervals for the difference between two sensitivities at a fixed level of specificity publication-title: Stat Med – reference: . Accessed June 8, 2014. – volume: 63 start-page: 986 year: 2013 ident: bib15 article-title: Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 64 start-page: 876 year: 2013 ident: bib5 article-title: Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 24 start-page: 465 year: 2005 ident: bib21 article-title: Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 59 start-page: 280 year: 2013 ident: bib11 article-title: Comparative assessment of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion with the serum [-2]proprostate-specific antigen-based prostate health index for detection of prostate cancer publication-title: Clin Chem – volume: 112 start-page: 543 year: 2013 ident: bib22 article-title: American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 180 start-page: 539 year: 2008 ident: bib10 article-title: [-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection: a national cancer institute early detection research network validation study publication-title: J Urol – volume: 115 start-page: 537 year: 2015 ident: bib14 article-title: Clinical performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) for the prediction of prostate cancer in obese men: data from the PROMEtheuS project, a multicentre European prospective study publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 164 start-page: 444 year: 2014 ident: bib13 article-title: Prostate health index vs %free prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in men with “gray” prostate-specific antigen levels at first biopsy: systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Transl Res – volume: 61 start-page: 1115 year: 2012 ident: bib6 article-title: To biopsy or not to biopsy—thou shall think twice publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 193 start-page: 1163 year: 2015 ident: bib27 article-title: The Prostate Health Index selectively identifies clinically significant prostate cancer publication-title: J Urol – volume: 19 start-page: 313 year: 2000 ident: bib19 article-title: Bootstrap confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a quantitative diagnostic test publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 51 start-page: 729 year: 2013 ident: bib12 article-title: Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med – volume: 185 start-page: 1650 year: 2011 ident: bib7 article-title: A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range publication-title: J Urol – year: 2007 ident: bib18 article-title: Analyzing Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves with SAS – volume: 57 start-page: 921 year: 2010 ident: bib26 article-title: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 350 start-page: 2239 year: 2004 ident: bib4 article-title: Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 279 start-page: 1542 year: 1998 ident: bib8 article-title: Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial publication-title: JAMA – volume: 69 start-page: 198 year: 2009 ident: bib24 article-title: A [-2]proPSA-based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases publication-title: Prostate – year: 2003 ident: bib20 article-title: The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction – volume: 366 start-page: 981 year: 2012 ident: bib3 article-title: Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 183 start-page: 1355 year: 2010 ident: bib9 article-title: [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study publication-title: J Urol – volume: 82 start-page: 60 year: 2013 ident: bib2 article-title: Patient demographics, quality of life, and disease features of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: trends in the PSA era publication-title: Urology – volume: 413 start-page: 1279 year: 2012 ident: bib16 article-title: Multi-center analytical performance evaluation of the Access Hybritech(R) p2PSA immunoassay publication-title: Clin Chim Acta – reference: American Cancer Society®: Prostate Cancer, 2014. Available at – volume: 157 start-page: 120 year: 2012 ident: bib23 article-title: Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 8 start-page: e67687 year: 2013 ident: bib25 article-title: Prostate Health Index (Phi) and Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) significantly improve prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 61 start-page: 1115 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib6 article-title: To biopsy or not to biopsy—thou shall think twice publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.055 – volume: 51 start-page: 729 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib12 article-title: Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0410 – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib20 – volume: 112 start-page: 543 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib22 article-title: American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12318 – volume: 69 start-page: 198 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib24 article-title: A [-2]proPSA-based artificial neural network significantly improves differentiation between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases publication-title: Prostate doi: 10.1002/pros.20872 – volume: 180 start-page: 539 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib10 article-title: [-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection: a national cancer institute early detection research network validation study publication-title: J Urol – volume: 185 start-page: 1650 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib7 article-title: A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml prostate specific antigen range publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.032 – volume: 350 start-page: 2239 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib4 article-title: Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031918 – volume: 24 start-page: 465 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib21 article-title: Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.1563 – volume: 25 start-page: 3487 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib17 article-title: New confidence intervals for the difference between two sensitivities at a fixed level of specificity publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.2459 – volume: 366 start-page: 981 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib3 article-title: Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135 – volume: 64 start-page: 876 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib5 article-title: Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049 – volume: 63 start-page: 986 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib15 article-title: Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.011 – year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib18 – volume: 193 start-page: 1163 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib27 article-title: The Prostate Health Index selectively identifies clinically significant prostate cancer publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.121 – volume: 82 start-page: 60 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib2 article-title: Patient demographics, quality of life, and disease features of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: trends in the PSA era publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.072 – volume: 279 start-page: 1542 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib8 article-title: Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1542 – volume: 19 start-page: 313 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib19 article-title: Bootstrap confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a quantitative diagnostic test publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<313::AID-SIM370>3.0.CO;2-K – volume: 164 start-page: 444 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib13 article-title: Prostate health index vs %free prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in men with “gray” prostate-specific antigen levels at first biopsy: systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Transl Res doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.06.006 – volume: 115 start-page: 537 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib14 article-title: Clinical performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) for the prediction of prostate cancer in obese men: data from the PROMEtheuS project, a multicentre European prospective study publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12907 – volume: 59 start-page: 280 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib11 article-title: Comparative assessment of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion with the serum [-2]proprostate-specific antigen-based prostate health index for detection of prostate cancer publication-title: Clin Chem doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.195560 – volume: 157 start-page: 120 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib23 article-title: Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459 – volume: 183 start-page: 1355 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib9 article-title: [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.056 – volume: 413 start-page: 1279 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib16 article-title: Multi-center analytical performance evaluation of the Access Hybritech(R) p2PSA immunoassay publication-title: Clin Chim Acta doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.015 – volume: 8 start-page: e67687 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib25 article-title: Prostate Health Index (Phi) and Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3) significantly improve prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067687 – volume: 57 start-page: 921 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib26 article-title: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.003 – ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091_bib1 |
SSID | ssj0014572 |
Score | 2.530086 |
Snippet | Purpose We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Materials and... We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population. Two independent prospective... We evaluated the ability of PHI to discriminate aggressive prostate cancer from indolent or no cancer in a biopsy naïve population.PURPOSEWe evaluated the... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 65 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biopsy Health Status Indicators Humans Male Mathematical Concepts Middle Aged nomograms Prospective Studies prostate Prostate - pathology prostate-specific antigen Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood prostatic neoplasms Prostatic Neoplasms - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Urology |
Title | Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Men |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0022534715001834 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.091 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636659 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1690212533 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4696043 |
Volume | 194 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6FVkJcEG_CS4vELXJk7_oRH0OgFESrSKSot9V6vS6JUidKnEP5Pdz5EfwxZrzrVwsV9BJFzjprZ77MzHq_-YaQN8nI85nytQPhIHZ8JhP0g8qRLOFhAojSpUjS0XF4eOJ_Og1Oe70fLdbSrkiG6vsf60puYlU4BnbFKtn_sGz9pXAA3oN94RUsDK__ZOOyehbplcjUqGW7q23_KRZ0QCpZlRp9RGFEzDXfadw5GIzPyrU2UofqoRMEATLUsUnlensB3rfcSj_AHkW2amzRAKyVzu42nQf0qR4sJVZ-GbryZClbNNspXOfSMOoLmHYjL5rgoOcVQ3gwGzbbRKgg2Ur4B1-G7ecVXlBzW9v1AwE3OptDbd0uQ1cXd_2y6X7cAaDxsqa7hI3XpvPPlUhgHkoshgu4fWTwGXVW0xmsBY31eYkNSPx4GFpt8q7-9vRo4ocoYcNvkX0GixHwpvsf3n7-Oq53q_wgqlXp8c5scZbhEV6-AJSftrP9LRe6uta5TNlt5UCze-SutTYdGyTeJz2dPyC3jyw94yE5bwGSNoCkq4wCIGmFMmoASUtA0mJFDSBpA8hmqAEknefUAJIey18_YQCA8RE5OXg_mxw6tp-HowIeFo7KPBnFynNloKXLdACpEA-wa2jGUxZrlmVJ7Oo0GWEUYW4UQS4bKx14mQpHacwfk718leunhPJIhSlzR5EMpJ9KT3LGFUNtvTRLNU_7xKt-WaGs2D32XFmKitW4EGgYgYYRrifAMH0yqM9ZG6mXa0dHlcFEVcQMYVdvrX_YCk9smXAF0iEYogKWXi4EUL9PgvpMm-aa9FUAdq-d8XWFCwExADf2ZK5XO5gpjLFTA6zc-uSJwUl9BxXW4Ho7CKoHoL5895N8_q3Umbewf3bjM5-TO40HeEH2is1Ov4Qcvkhe2b_QbxHJ8xc |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter+Evaluation+of+the+Prostate+Health+Index+to+Detect+Aggressive+Prostate+Cancer+in+Biopsy+Na%C3%AFve+Men&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+urology&rft.au=de+la+Calle%2C+Claire&rft.au=Patil%2C+Dattatraya&rft.au=Wei%2C+John+T.&rft.au=Scherr%2C+Douglas+S.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.issn=0022-5347&rft.eissn=1527-3792&rft.volume=194&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=72&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.juro.2015.01.091&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25636659&rft.externalDocID=PMC4696043 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00225347%2FS0022534714X00078%2Fcov150h.gif |