Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review
While artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on relatively homogeneous datasets, and populations poorly-representative of underlying diversity, limits generalisability and risks biased AI-based decisions. He...
Saved in:
Published in | PLOS digital health Vol. 1; no. 3; p. e0000022 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
01.03.2022
PLOS Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2767-3170 2767-3170 |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000022 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | While artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on relatively homogeneous datasets, and populations poorly-representative of underlying diversity, limits generalisability and risks biased AI-based decisions. Here, we describe the landscape of AI in clinical medicine to delineate population and data-source disparities.
We performed a scoping review of clinical papers published in PubMed in 2019 using AI techniques. We assessed differences in dataset country source, clinical specialty, and author nationality, sex, and expertise. A manually tagged subsample of PubMed articles was used to train a model, leveraging transfer-learning techniques (building upon an existing BioBERT model) to predict eligibility for inclusion (original, human, clinical AI literature). Of all eligible articles, database country source and clinical specialty were manually labelled. A BioBERT-based model predicted first/last author expertise. Author nationality was determined using corresponding affiliated institution information using Entrez Direct. And first/last author sex was evaluated using the Gendarize.io API.
Our search yielded 30,576 articles, of which 7,314 (23.9%) were eligible for further analysis. Most databases came from the US (40.8%) and China (13.7%). Radiology was the most represented clinical specialty (40.4%), followed by pathology (9.1%). Authors were primarily from either China (24.0%) or the US (18.4%). First and last authors were predominately data experts (i.e., statisticians) (59.6% and 53.9% respectively) rather than clinicians. And the majority of first/last authors were male (74.1%).
U.S. and Chinese datasets and authors were disproportionately overrepresented in clinical AI, and almost all of the top 10 databases and author nationalities were from high income countries (HICs). AI techniques were most commonly employed for image-rich specialties, and authors were predominantly male, with non-clinical backgrounds. Development of technological infrastructure in data-poor regions, and diligence in external validation and model re-calibration prior to clinical implementation in the short-term, are crucial in ensuring clinical AI is meaningful for broader populations, and to avoid perpetuating global health inequity. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundWhile artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on relatively homogeneous datasets, and populations poorly-representative of underlying diversity, limits generalisability and risks biased AI-based decisions. Here, we describe the landscape of AI in clinical medicine to delineate population and data-source disparities.MethodsWe performed a scoping review of clinical papers published in PubMed in 2019 using AI techniques. We assessed differences in dataset country source, clinical specialty, and author nationality, sex, and expertise. A manually tagged subsample of PubMed articles was used to train a model, leveraging transfer-learning techniques (building upon an existing BioBERT model) to predict eligibility for inclusion (original, human, clinical AI literature). Of all eligible articles, database country source and clinical specialty were manually labelled. A BioBERT-based model predicted first/last author expertise. Author nationality was determined using corresponding affiliated institution information using Entrez Direct. And first/last author sex was evaluated using the Gendarize.io API.ResultsOur search yielded 30,576 articles, of which 7,314 (23.9%) were eligible for further analysis. Most databases came from the US (40.8%) and China (13.7%). Radiology was the most represented clinical specialty (40.4%), followed by pathology (9.1%). Authors were primarily from either China (24.0%) or the US (18.4%). First and last authors were predominately data experts (i.e., statisticians) (59.6% and 53.9% respectively) rather than clinicians. And the majority of first/last authors were male (74.1%).InterpretationU.S. and Chinese datasets and authors were disproportionately overrepresented in clinical AI, and almost all of the top 10 databases and author nationalities were from high income countries (HICs). AI techniques were most commonly employed for image-rich specialties, and authors were predominantly male, with non-clinical backgrounds. Development of technological infrastructure in data-poor regions, and diligence in external validation and model re-calibration prior to clinical implementation in the short-term, are crucial in ensuring clinical AI is meaningful for broader populations, and to avoid perpetuating global health inequity. Artificial Intelligence (AI) creates opportunities for accurate, objective and immediate decision support in healthcare with little expert input–especially valuable in resource-poor settings where there is shortage of specialist care. Given that AI poorly generalises to cohorts outside those whose data was used to train and validate the algorithms, populations in data-rich regions stand to benefit substantially more vs data-poor regions, entrenching existing healthcare disparities. Here, we show that more than half of the datasets used for clinical AI originate from either the US or China. In addition, the U.S. and China contribute over 40% of the authors of the publications. While the models may perform on-par/better than clinician decision-making in the well-represented regions, benefits elsewhere are not guaranteed. Further, we show discrepancies in gender and specialty representation–notably that almost three-quarters of the coveted first/senior authorship positions were held by men, and radiology accounted for 40% of all clinical AI manuscripts. We emphasize that building equitable sociodemographic representation in data repositories, in author nationality, gender and expertise, and in clinical specialties is crucial in ameliorating health inequities. While artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on relatively homogeneous datasets, and populations poorly-representative of underlying diversity, limits generalisability and risks biased AI-based decisions. Here, we describe the landscape of AI in clinical medicine to delineate population and data-source disparities. We performed a scoping review of clinical papers published in PubMed in 2019 using AI techniques. We assessed differences in dataset country source, clinical specialty, and author nationality, sex, and expertise. A manually tagged subsample of PubMed articles was used to train a model, leveraging transfer-learning techniques (building upon an existing BioBERT model) to predict eligibility for inclusion (original, human, clinical AI literature). Of all eligible articles, database country source and clinical specialty were manually labelled. A BioBERT-based model predicted first/last author expertise. Author nationality was determined using corresponding affiliated institution information using Entrez Direct. And first/last author sex was evaluated using the Gendarize.io API. Our search yielded 30,576 articles, of which 7,314 (23.9%) were eligible for further analysis. Most databases came from the US (40.8%) and China (13.7%). Radiology was the most represented clinical specialty (40.4%), followed by pathology (9.1%). Authors were primarily from either China (24.0%) or the US (18.4%). First and last authors were predominately data experts (i.e., statisticians) (59.6% and 53.9% respectively) rather than clinicians. And the majority of first/last authors were male (74.1%). U.S. and Chinese datasets and authors were disproportionately overrepresented in clinical AI, and almost all of the top 10 databases and author nationalities were from high income countries (HICs). AI techniques were most commonly employed for image-rich specialties, and authors were predominantly male, with non-clinical backgrounds. Development of technological infrastructure in data-poor regions, and diligence in external validation and model re-calibration prior to clinical implementation in the short-term, are crucial in ensuring clinical AI is meaningful for broader populations, and to avoid perpetuating global health inequity. Background While artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on relatively homogeneous datasets, and populations poorly-representative of underlying diversity, limits generalisability and risks biased AI-based decisions. Here, we describe the landscape of AI in clinical medicine to delineate population and data-source disparities. Methods We performed a scoping review of clinical papers published in PubMed in 2019 using AI techniques. We assessed differences in dataset country source, clinical specialty, and author nationality, sex, and expertise. A manually tagged subsample of PubMed articles was used to train a model, leveraging transfer-learning techniques (building upon an existing BioBERT model) to predict eligibility for inclusion (original, human, clinical AI literature). Of all eligible articles, database country source and clinical specialty were manually labelled. A BioBERT-based model predicted first/last author expertise. Author nationality was determined using corresponding affiliated institution information using Entrez Direct. And first/last author sex was evaluated using the Gendarize.io API. Results Our search yielded 30,576 articles, of which 7,314 (23.9%) were eligible for further analysis. Most databases came from the US (40.8%) and China (13.7%). Radiology was the most represented clinical specialty (40.4%), followed by pathology (9.1%). Authors were primarily from either China (24.0%) or the US (18.4%). First and last authors were predominately data experts (i.e., statisticians) (59.6% and 53.9% respectively) rather than clinicians. And the majority of first/last authors were male (74.1%). Interpretation U.S. and Chinese datasets and authors were disproportionately overrepresented in clinical AI, and almost all of the top 10 databases and author nationalities were from high income countries (HICs). AI techniques were most commonly employed for image-rich specialties, and authors were predominantly male, with non-clinical backgrounds. Development of technological infrastructure in data-poor regions, and diligence in external validation and model re-calibration prior to clinical implementation in the short-term, are crucial in ensuring clinical AI is meaningful for broader populations, and to avoid perpetuating global health inequity. While artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on relatively homogeneous datasets, and populations poorly-representative of underlying diversity, limits generalisability and risks biased AI-based decisions. Here, we describe the landscape of AI in clinical medicine to delineate population and data-source disparities.BACKGROUNDWhile artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on relatively homogeneous datasets, and populations poorly-representative of underlying diversity, limits generalisability and risks biased AI-based decisions. Here, we describe the landscape of AI in clinical medicine to delineate population and data-source disparities.We performed a scoping review of clinical papers published in PubMed in 2019 using AI techniques. We assessed differences in dataset country source, clinical specialty, and author nationality, sex, and expertise. A manually tagged subsample of PubMed articles was used to train a model, leveraging transfer-learning techniques (building upon an existing BioBERT model) to predict eligibility for inclusion (original, human, clinical AI literature). Of all eligible articles, database country source and clinical specialty were manually labelled. A BioBERT-based model predicted first/last author expertise. Author nationality was determined using corresponding affiliated institution information using Entrez Direct. And first/last author sex was evaluated using the Gendarize.io API.METHODSWe performed a scoping review of clinical papers published in PubMed in 2019 using AI techniques. We assessed differences in dataset country source, clinical specialty, and author nationality, sex, and expertise. A manually tagged subsample of PubMed articles was used to train a model, leveraging transfer-learning techniques (building upon an existing BioBERT model) to predict eligibility for inclusion (original, human, clinical AI literature). Of all eligible articles, database country source and clinical specialty were manually labelled. A BioBERT-based model predicted first/last author expertise. Author nationality was determined using corresponding affiliated institution information using Entrez Direct. And first/last author sex was evaluated using the Gendarize.io API.Our search yielded 30,576 articles, of which 7,314 (23.9%) were eligible for further analysis. Most databases came from the US (40.8%) and China (13.7%). Radiology was the most represented clinical specialty (40.4%), followed by pathology (9.1%). Authors were primarily from either China (24.0%) or the US (18.4%). First and last authors were predominately data experts (i.e., statisticians) (59.6% and 53.9% respectively) rather than clinicians. And the majority of first/last authors were male (74.1%).RESULTSOur search yielded 30,576 articles, of which 7,314 (23.9%) were eligible for further analysis. Most databases came from the US (40.8%) and China (13.7%). Radiology was the most represented clinical specialty (40.4%), followed by pathology (9.1%). Authors were primarily from either China (24.0%) or the US (18.4%). First and last authors were predominately data experts (i.e., statisticians) (59.6% and 53.9% respectively) rather than clinicians. And the majority of first/last authors were male (74.1%).U.S. and Chinese datasets and authors were disproportionately overrepresented in clinical AI, and almost all of the top 10 databases and author nationalities were from high income countries (HICs). AI techniques were most commonly employed for image-rich specialties, and authors were predominantly male, with non-clinical backgrounds. Development of technological infrastructure in data-poor regions, and diligence in external validation and model re-calibration prior to clinical implementation in the short-term, are crucial in ensuring clinical AI is meaningful for broader populations, and to avoid perpetuating global health inequity.INTERPRETATIONU.S. and Chinese datasets and authors were disproportionately overrepresented in clinical AI, and almost all of the top 10 databases and author nationalities were from high income countries (HICs). AI techniques were most commonly employed for image-rich specialties, and authors were predominantly male, with non-clinical backgrounds. Development of technological infrastructure in data-poor regions, and diligence in external validation and model re-calibration prior to clinical implementation in the short-term, are crucial in ensuring clinical AI is meaningful for broader populations, and to avoid perpetuating global health inequity. |
Author | Charpignon, Marie-Laure Situ, Julia Dernoncourt, Franck Moukheiber, Lama Celi, Leo Anthony Mitchell, William Greig Yao, Seth Eber, Rene Schirmer, Julian Wawira, Judy Gichoya Dee, Edward Christopher Park, Joel Cellini, Jacqueline Paguio, Joseph |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Cambridge, MA, United States of America 4 Harvard Medical School, Department of Library Services, Boston, MA, United States of America 7 Adobe Inc, Adobe Research, San Jose, CA, United States of America 9 Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America 6 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America 10 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America 14 Emory University, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Informatics, Atlanta, GA, United States of America 3 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America 11 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science and Molecular Biology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America 2 Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Boston, MA, United States of America 8 Montpellier Universit |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 3 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America – name: 9 Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America – name: 10 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America – name: 6 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America – name: 12 Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, Department of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America – name: 14 Emory University, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Informatics, Atlanta, GA, United States of America – name: 7 Adobe Inc, Adobe Research, San Jose, CA, United States of America – name: 4 Harvard Medical School, Department of Library Services, Boston, MA, United States of America – name: 2 Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Boston, MA, United States of America – name: Brown University, UNITED STATES – name: 13 BeiGene, Applied Innovation, Cambridge, MA, United States of America – name: 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Cambridge, MA, United States of America – name: 5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Institute for Data, Systems and Society, Cambridge, MA, United States of America – name: 8 Montpellier University, Montpellier Research in Management, Montpellier, France – name: 11 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science and Molecular Biology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Leo Anthony surname: Celi fullname: Celi, Leo Anthony – sequence: 2 givenname: Jacqueline surname: Cellini fullname: Cellini, Jacqueline – sequence: 3 givenname: Marie-Laure orcidid: 0000-0002-5786-2627 surname: Charpignon fullname: Charpignon, Marie-Laure – sequence: 4 givenname: Edward Christopher orcidid: 0000-0001-6119-0889 surname: Dee fullname: Dee, Edward Christopher – sequence: 5 givenname: Franck orcidid: 0000-0002-1119-1346 surname: Dernoncourt fullname: Dernoncourt, Franck – sequence: 6 givenname: Rene orcidid: 0000-0002-4347-0198 surname: Eber fullname: Eber, Rene – sequence: 7 givenname: William Greig orcidid: 0000-0002-2122-6741 surname: Mitchell fullname: Mitchell, William Greig – sequence: 8 givenname: Lama surname: Moukheiber fullname: Moukheiber, Lama – sequence: 9 givenname: Julian surname: Schirmer fullname: Schirmer, Julian – sequence: 10 givenname: Julia surname: Situ fullname: Situ, Julia – sequence: 11 givenname: Joseph orcidid: 0000-0003-4054-5112 surname: Paguio fullname: Paguio, Joseph – sequence: 12 givenname: Joel orcidid: 0000-0003-1319-6893 surname: Park fullname: Park, Joel – sequence: 13 givenname: Judy Gichoya surname: Wawira fullname: Wawira, Judy Gichoya – sequence: 14 givenname: Seth orcidid: 0000-0003-0851-6223 surname: Yao fullname: Yao, Seth |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.science/hal-03857753$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNp9UsGO0zAQtdAidin7BwhF4gKHljh24oQDUrUCdqVKHICzNbEnias0DrZTxI2P4Av5Ehzaot0e8MEe2--9mbHfU3Ix2AEJeU7TFWWCvtnayQ3Qr0Zt2lU6jyx7RK4yUYgloyK9uBdfkmvvtzOkpKmo6BNyyYqSZjnLroj6HJUU-sQ2SW3AJ2ZIwAXTGGWgj7uAfW9aHBQmoYOQjOhGDBMETDqEPnQKHCba-BGcCQb975-_1knb2zrSHe4Nfn9GHjfQe7w-rgvy9cP7Lze3y82nj3c3681S5awIy5yLFEHUIudpbFKUAKmuUOuMQpEVQmPFSi6qBjRSzkst8gYY5UXTAGUlYwtyd9DVFrZydGYH7oe0YOTfA-taObemepSiqLnOaqYLYBx0CRp0xmKIBWfAddR6d9Aap3qHWuEQHPQPRB_eDKaTrd3LqmKUxWoW5PVBoDuj3a43cj5LWZkLkbM9jdhXx2TOfpvQB7kzXsWHhwHt5GUmRMVyKugMfXkGPVrBS5aWeVHGWUTUi_vV_8t_-vcIeHsAKGe9d9hIZQIEY-dmTC9pKmefncTl7DN59Fkk8zPySf-_tD8XB9xC |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_s41390_024_03719_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomp_2022_1070493 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0375_9393_22_16739_8 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjhci_2024_101120 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_022_01147_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_thorsurg_2023_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpi_2023_100347 crossref_primary_10_3390_ai4030034 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44401_024_00001_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2024_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaccao_2024_05_005 crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics13193909 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12206524 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lanepe_2024_101064 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41649_024_00282_9 crossref_primary_10_52711_0974_360X_2024_00714 crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2023_26930 crossref_primary_10_3390_app131810258 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2024_110385 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgh_2023_013092 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000599 crossref_primary_10_1080_17483107_2025_2477678 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamapediatrics_2025_0096 crossref_primary_10_3238_arztebl_m2023_0124 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_q490 crossref_primary_10_3389_frtra_2024_1399324 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11042_023_16029_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2025_109984 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjophth_2022_001216 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40615_024_02237_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrc_2024_154796 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_023_40604_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40942_023_00459_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_024_01212_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12242550 crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2025_1550731 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_023_08209_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2024_1448351 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12112683 crossref_primary_10_3389_frai_2025_1545869 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamainternmed_2023_1832 crossref_primary_10_12968_jpar_2024_0084 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ccrj_2023_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3369912 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20220878 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_024_01306_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43681_024_00589_1 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjhci_2022_100650 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csbr_2024_100006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12032_025_02617_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2025_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocae060 crossref_primary_10_11159_jbeb_2024_005 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_023_02941_4 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000495 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000651 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00146_024_02178_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xcrm_2023_101356 crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000002697 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00125_023_06038_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_024_01212_9 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_025_01503_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12070706 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcpdig_2024_100189 crossref_primary_10_1097_PSY_0000000000001200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrai_2025_100006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2022_12_087 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_025_01485_6 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6579_acead2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41649_024_00314_4 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41405_024_00198_4 crossref_primary_10_5492_wjccm_v13_i2_89644 crossref_primary_10_7705_biomedica_7242 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_61220 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_56317 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics15020221 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41582_024_01033_y crossref_primary_10_1093_jamiaopen_ooae035 crossref_primary_10_1097_NNE_0000000000001390 crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_12_11_8 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000368 crossref_primary_10_3390_systems12020047 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848251321915 crossref_primary_10_2196_50903 crossref_primary_10_3390_s25020531 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000390 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_cs_1630 crossref_primary_10_1080_00098655_2024_2393153 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00146_025_02198_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s00238_024_02162_9 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41581_023_00763_4 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0266462323002593 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgph_0004171 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacadv_2023_100578 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12939_023_01839_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1378904 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lanwpc_2024_101254 crossref_primary_10_2196_60148 crossref_primary_10_4103_atm_atm_192_23 crossref_primary_10_1145_3610107 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbi_2024_104664 crossref_primary_10_26468_trakyasobed_1478054 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2589_7500_24_00224_3 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamiaopen_ooae091 crossref_primary_10_1177_00220345241272052 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e40775 crossref_primary_10_2147_NSS_S455765 crossref_primary_10_69821_JoSME_v1iI_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcpdig_2023_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13721_024_00497_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2215_0366_22_00312_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_00461520_2024_2441661 crossref_primary_10_2174_0118742106279454240321044427 crossref_primary_10_1080_23299460_2025_2459451 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tvir_2024_100990 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_025_01490_9 crossref_primary_10_1088_2516_1091_ad04c0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_outlook_2023_102064 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2589_7500_23_00150_4 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac156 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13121995 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOO_0000000000001041 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000728 crossref_primary_10_2196_58578 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10389_024_02219_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artmed_2024_102815 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41597_023_02256_2 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41571_024_00909_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00228_024_03780_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2024_111852 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1510792 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_69555 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2024_46615 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcl_2024_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000574 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11882_023_01084_z crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2024_1351637 crossref_primary_10_3390_clinpract13040089 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1004432 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj11020043 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11090894 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_80676 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbi_2024_104643 crossref_primary_10_2196_57750 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_024_01833_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2025_105804 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737167_2023_2279107 crossref_primary_10_1093_jnci_djad123 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2024_081554 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2024_105626 crossref_primary_10_1200_GO_24_00613 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16010130 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_29101 crossref_primary_10_1109_JBHI_2024_3491946 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13206246 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2589_7500_23_00025_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13247833 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10877_024_01157_y crossref_primary_10_3390_life14060652 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_q2194 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcjq_2023_03_009 crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2024_1475092 crossref_primary_10_1002_mus_28023 crossref_primary_10_1056_AIp2401088 |
Cites_doi | 10.1001/jama.2018.11100 10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 10.1038/s42256-021-00307-0 10.7326/M18-1990 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.034 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.070 10.1001/jama.2018.11103 10.1001/jama.2019.16842 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039 10.1001/jama.2016.17438 10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682 10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020 10.1177/0194599819827507 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30292-2 10.7717/peerj.7702 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14051 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 10.1200/JCO.20.01688 10.1001/jama.2017.18391 10.1038/s41746-019-0172-3 10.1038/s41746-021-00455-y 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002683 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30065-0 10.12788/jhm.3248 10.1136/bmj.m689 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z 10.1038/s41746-020-0288-5 10.1001/jama.2020.12067 10.1080/1364557032000119616 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105832 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2348 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 10.25300/MISQ/2021/16564 10.1371/journal.pone.0198551 10.1287/isre.2021.1046 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.030 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright: © 2022 Celi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2022 Celi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 2022 Celi et al 2022 Celi et al |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright: © 2022 Celi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. – notice: 2022 Celi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License – notice: 2022 Celi et al 2022 Celi et al |
CorporateAuthor | for MIT Critical Data |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: for MIT Critical Data |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000022 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Public Health Database (subscription) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Public Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Computer Science |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Sources of bias in ai that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review |
EISSN | 2767-3170 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_76b4d2b3d6a34ad8adad2334ae643a4d PMC9931338 oai_HAL_hal_03857753v1 36812532 10_1371_journal_pdig_0000022 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS grantid: R01 EB017205 |
GroupedDBID | 53G 7X7 8C1 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAYXX ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BENPR CCPQU CITATION EIHBH FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK M~E OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY RPM UKHRP NPM PJZUB PPXIY 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC COVID DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 PUEGO 1XC VOOES 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-5470ea7b754013778aa0d9edd21a6267de938479fade1448d75fa3146ffa13833 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 2767-3170 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 00:57:49 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:37:43 EDT 2025 Fri May 09 12:28:22 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 24 03:09:14 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 22:15:26 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:58:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:13:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:56 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright: © 2022 Celi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c536t-5470ea7b754013778aa0d9edd21a6267de938479fade1448d75fa3146ffa13833 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Leo Anthony Celi is the Editor-in Chief of PLOS Digital Health and Judy Gichoya Wawira is a Section Editor for PLOS Digital Health. |
ORCID | 0000-0002-5786-2627 0000-0003-0851-6223 0000-0003-4054-5112 0000-0001-6119-0889 0000-0002-2122-6741 0000-0002-1119-1346 0000-0002-4347-0198 0000-0003-1319-6893 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3085683087?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 36812532 |
PQID | 3085683087 |
PQPubID | 6980581 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_76b4d2b3d6a34ad8adad2334ae643a4d pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9931338 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03857753v1 proquest_miscellaneous_2779351711 proquest_journals_3085683087 pubmed_primary_36812532 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000022 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000022 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-03-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2022 text: 2022-03-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
PublicationTitle | PLOS digital health |
PublicationTitleAlternate | PLOS Digit Health |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science PLOS Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: PLOS – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
References | D Levac (pdig.0000022.ref030) 2010; 5 K. Wiggers (pdig.0000022.ref047) 2020 JD West (pdig.0000022.ref065) 2013; 8 G. Hinton (pdig.0000022.ref004) 2018; 30 pdig.0000022.ref019 pdig.0000022.ref018 QD Nguyen (pdig.0000022.ref056) 2012; 119 B Hao (pdig.0000022.ref046) 2020 pdig.0000022.ref050 L Santamaria (pdig.0000022.ref037) 2018; 4 S-E Bursell (pdig.0000022.ref058) 2018; 13 T Mikolov (pdig.0000022.ref041) 2013 C. Naylor (pdig.0000022.ref006) 2018; 320 I Bardhan (pdig.0000022.ref020) 2020; 44 D Cirillo (pdig.0000022.ref064) 2020; 3 S Benjamens (pdig.0000022.ref010) 2020; 3 R Thompson (pdig.0000022.ref060) 2018; 129 AS Ahuja (pdig.0000022.ref014) 2019; 7 L Velagapudi (pdig.0000022.ref017) 2021; 30 EJ Topol (pdig.0000022.ref008) 2019; 25 L Rasmy (pdig.0000022.ref044) 2021; 4 QD Nguyen (pdig.0000022.ref054) 2012; 119 A Adamson (pdig.0000022.ref015) 2018; 154 pdig.0000022.ref040 E Alsentzer (pdig.0000022.ref043) J Futoma (pdig.0000022.ref024) 2020; 2 MD McCradden (pdig.0000022.ref063) 2020; 2 J Pennington (pdig.0000022.ref042) 2014 (pdig.0000022.ref002) 2018 AL Beam (pdig.0000022.ref012) 2018; 319 M West (pdig.0000022.ref066) 2006 W Mitchell (pdig.0000022.ref052) 2021; 21 A Bur (pdig.0000022.ref001) 2019; 160 N Bostrom (pdig.0000022.ref021) 2014 H. Sucharew (pdig.0000022.ref026) 2019; 14 R Thompson (pdig.0000022.ref061) 2018; 102 A Rajkomar (pdig.0000022.ref016) 2018; 169 O Arksey H (pdig.0000022.ref028) 2005; 8 S Wada (pdig.0000022.ref045) 2021 J Lee (pdig.0000022.ref033) 2019; 36 Z Munn (pdig.0000022.ref027) 2018; 18 pdig.0000022.ref036 pdig.0000022.ref035 pdig.0000022.ref034 SM Khan (pdig.0000022.ref057) 2020 T Ching (pdig.0000022.ref005) 2018; 15 pdig.0000022.ref039 pdig.0000022.ref038 M Roberts (pdig.0000022.ref048) 2021; 3 pdig.0000022.ref032 A Kaushal (pdig.0000022.ref049) 2020; 324 pdig.0000022.ref031 S Jha (pdig.0000022.ref007) 2016; 316 B Beaulieu-Jones (pdig.0000022.ref009) 2019; 2 S Lebovitz (pdig.0000022.ref023) 2021; 45 M Tempelier (pdig.0000022.ref029) 2015 M Nagendran (pdig.0000022.ref011) 2020 A Esteva (pdig.0000022.ref051) 2019; 25 JR Zech (pdig.0000022.ref053) 2018; 15 JC Hong (pdig.0000022.ref059) 2020; 38 F Arcadu (pdig.0000022.ref025) 2019; 2 H. Jain (pdig.0000022.ref022) 2021; 32 T Hwang (pdig.0000022.ref062) 2019; 322 D Brown (pdig.0000022.ref055) 2013; 120 V Gulshan (pdig.0000022.ref013) 2019 UJ Muehlematter (pdig.0000022.ref003) 2021; 3 |
References_xml | – volume: 30 start-page: 1101 issue: 11 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref004 article-title: Deep learning—a technology with the potential to transform health care publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11100 – volume: 15 start-page: 20170387 issue: 141 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref005 article-title: Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine publication-title: Journal of The Royal Society Interface doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 – volume: 3 start-page: 199 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: pdig.0000022.ref048 article-title: Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for covid-19 using chest radiographs and ct scans publication-title: Nature Machine Intelligence doi: 10.1038/s42256-021-00307-0 – volume: 169 start-page: 866 issue: 12 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref016 article-title: Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity publication-title: Annals of Internal Medicine doi: 10.7326/M18-1990 – volume: 2 start-page: e489 issue: 9 year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref024 article-title: The myth of generalisability in clinical research and machine learning in health care publication-title: The Lancet Digital Health doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2 – volume: 120 start-page: 2013 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: pdig.0000022.ref055 article-title: Long-term outcomes of ranibizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema: The 36-month results from two phase iii trials publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.034 – volume: 102 start-page: 1159 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref061 article-title: Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology imaging publication-title: INternational Journal of Radiation Oncology doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.070 – volume: 320 start-page: 1099 issue: 11 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref006 article-title: On the prospects for a (deep) learning health care system publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11103 – volume: 322 start-page: 2285 issue: 23 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref062 article-title: Lifecycle regulation of artificial intelligence–and machine learning–based software devices in medicine publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16842 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref019 – volume: 21 start-page: 1 issue: 228 year: 2021 ident: pdig.0000022.ref052 article-title: Generalisability through local validation: Overcoming barriers due to data disparity in healthcare publication-title: BMC Ophthalmology – volume: 119 start-page: 0 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: pdig.0000022.ref056 article-title: Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039 – volume: 316 start-page: 2353 issue: 22 year: 2016 ident: pdig.0000022.ref007 article-title: Adapting to artificial intelligence publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17438 – year: 2014 ident: pdig.0000022.ref042 article-title: Glove: Global vectors for word representation. publication-title: Paper presented at: 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) – volume: 3 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref010 article-title: The state of artificial intelligence-based fda-approved medical devices and algorithms: An online database. publication-title: npj Digital Medicine doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0 – volume: 36 start-page: 1234 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref033 article-title: Biobert: A pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref038 – volume-title: The ethics of artificial intelligence year: 2014 ident: pdig.0000022.ref021 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020 – volume: 160 start-page: 603 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref001 article-title: Artificial intelligence for the otolaryngologist: A state of the art review publication-title: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg doi: 10.1177/0194599819827507 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref034 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref043 article-title: Publicly available clinical bert embeddings. publication-title: arXiv pre-print server. 2019 – volume: 3 start-page: e195 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: pdig.0000022.ref003 article-title: Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices in the USA and europe (2015–20): A comparative analysis. publication-title: The Lancet Digital Health doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30292-2 – volume: 7 start-page: e7702 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref014 article-title: The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician. publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.7702 – volume: 2 start-page: e1914051 issue: 10 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref009 article-title: Trends and focus of machine learning applications for health research publication-title: JAMA Network Open doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14051 – volume: 5 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: pdig.0000022.ref030 article-title: Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. publication-title: Implement Sci doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 – volume: 38 start-page: 3652 issue: 31 year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref059 article-title: System for high-intensity evaluation during radiation therapy (shield-rt): A prospective randomized study of machine learning–directed clinical evaluations during radiation and chemoradiation. publication-title: Journal of Clinical Oncology doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01688 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref018 – volume: 44 start-page: 185 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref020 article-title: Connecting systems, data, and people: A multidisciplinary research roadmap for chronic disease management. publication-title: MIS Quarterly – volume: 319 start-page: 1317 issue: 13 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref012 article-title: Big data and machine learning in health care publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18391 – year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref047 article-title: Openai’s massive gpt-3 model is impressive, but size isn’t everything publication-title: The Machine: Making Sense of AIAccessed October – volume: 2 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref025 article-title: Deep learning algorithm predicts diabetic retinopathy progression in individual patients. publication-title: npj Digital Medicine doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0172-3 – volume: 4 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: pdig.0000022.ref044 article-title: Med-bert: Pretrained contextualized embeddings on large-scale structured electronic health records for disease prediction. publication-title: npj Digital Medicine doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00455-y – year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref046 article-title: Enhancing clinical bert embedding using a biomedical knowledge. publication-title: Paper presented at: 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics – ident: pdig.0000022.ref039 – start-page: 37 year: 2015 ident: pdig.0000022.ref029 article-title: framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the association for information systems publication-title: Communications of the Association for Information Systems – ident: pdig.0000022.ref035 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref031 – volume-title: Oxford english dictionary. year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref002 – volume: 15 start-page: e1002683 issue: 11 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref053 article-title: Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: A cross-sectional study. publication-title: PLOS Medicine doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002683 – volume: 2 start-page: e221 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref063 article-title: Ethical limitations of algorithmic fairness solutions in health care machine learning publication-title: The Lancet Digital Health doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30065-0 – volume: 14 start-page: 416 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref026 article-title: Methods for research evidence synthesis: The scoping review approach publication-title: Journal of Hospital Medicine doi: 10.12788/jhm.3248 – year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref013 article-title: Performance of a deep-learning algorithm vs manual grading for detecting diabetic retinopathy in india publication-title: JAMA Ophthalmol – start-page: m689 year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref011 article-title: Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: Systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.m689 – volume: 8 start-page: e66212 issue: 7 year: 2013 ident: pdig.0000022.ref065 article-title: The role of gender in scholarly authorship. publication-title: PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212 – volume: 18 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref027 article-title: Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. publication-title: BMC Medical Research Methodology doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x – volume: 25 start-page: 24 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref051 article-title: A guide to deep learning in healthcare publication-title: Nature Medicine doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z – volume: 3 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref064 article-title: Sex and gender differences and biases in artificial intelligence for biomedicine and healthcare publication-title: npj Digital Medicine doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0288-5 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref036 – year: 2021 ident: pdig.0000022.ref045 article-title: Pre-training technique to localize medical bert and enhance biomedical bert. publication-title: arXiv pre-print server. – ident: pdig.0000022.ref032 – volume: 324 start-page: 1212 issue: 12 year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref049 article-title: Geographic distribution of us cohorts used to train deep learning algorithms publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12067 – year: 2020 ident: pdig.0000022.ref057 article-title: A global review of publicly available datasets for ophthalmological imaging: Barriers to access, usability, and generalisability publication-title: The Lancet Digital Health – volume: 8 start-page: 19 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: pdig.0000022.ref028 article-title: ’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework publication-title: International Journal of Social Research Methodology doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616 – year: 2013 ident: pdig.0000022.ref041 article-title: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. publication-title: arXiv pre-print server – volume: 30 start-page: 105832 issue: 7 year: 2021 ident: pdig.0000022.ref017 article-title: Discrepancies in stroke distribution and dataset origin in machine learning for stroke publication-title: Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105832 – volume: 154 start-page: 1447 issue: 11 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref015 article-title: Machine learning and health care disparities in dermatology publication-title: JAMA Dermatol doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2348 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref040 – volume: 25 start-page: 44 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: pdig.0000022.ref008 article-title: High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence publication-title: Nature Medicine doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 – volume: 119 start-page: 789 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: pdig.0000022.ref054 article-title: Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: Results from 2 phase iii randomized trials: Rise and ride publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039 – volume: 45 start-page: 1501 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: pdig.0000022.ref023 article-title: Is ai ground truth really true? The dangers of training and evaluating ai tools based on experts’ know-what. publication-title: MIS Quarterly doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2021/16564 – volume: 13 start-page: e0198551 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref058 article-title: Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema in a primary care-based teleophthalmology program for american indians and alaskan natives. publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198551 – volume: 32 start-page: 675 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: pdig.0000022.ref022 article-title: Editorial for the special section on humans, algorithms, and augmented intelligence: The future of work, organizations, and society publication-title: Infromation Systems Research doi: 10.1287/isre.2021.1046 – ident: pdig.0000022.ref050 – volume: 4 issue: e156 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref037 article-title: Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services publication-title: PeerJ Computer Science – volume: 129 start-page: 421 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: pdig.0000022.ref060 article-title: Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: A specialty-wide disruptive transformation? publication-title: Radiotherapy and Oncology. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.030 – volume-title: Aup faculty gender equity indicators 2006 year: 2006 ident: pdig.0000022.ref066 |
SSID | ssj0002810791 |
Score | 2.610387 |
Snippet | While artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on relatively... BackgroundWhile artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on... Background While artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities of advanced clinical prediction and decision-making in healthcare, models trained on... Artificial Intelligence (AI) creates opportunities for accurate, objective and immediate decision support in healthcare with little expert input–especially... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral hal proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | e0000022 |
SubjectTerms | Artificial intelligence Automation Bias Biology and Life Sciences Clinical decision making Computer and Information Sciences Computer Science Deep learning Ecology and Environmental Sciences Engineering and Technology Global health Health care Machine learning Medical Subject Headings-MeSH Medicine and Health Sciences Natural language processing Neural networks Patients Radiology |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD4gLojxDS2UQ19CNncTOcYtarRDlApV6syZrmwSh7KrJ8vs7Y2ejLBx64Rb5FXtm7Jmxx58Z-1iWelFLW6e6chodlFyklS91qtZaal0QIgtdcL7-Vq5u8i-3xe3sqS-KCYvwwJFw56qscyuwuRJkDlaDBSskfjrUpZBbWn1R582cqV9hywjdmiob78pJlZ2PrPm0te3PCFooxIEuCpD9qGEaCoj819r8O2hypoWunrGno_nIl7Hbx-yR656zx9fjAfkLBt_DZnzPN57XLfS87TiNMeJE8HYGwMmHBga-dXdoN-_Q4uTNFArGbdvT64QEtpoueQQN4fGWy0t2c3X54_MqHV9RSNeFLIe0yNXCgapVkQd4QQ2wsJWzVmSA3oyyrpKooioP1qF3pa0qPEhcQL2HDP1X-YoddZvOvWHca6iVrdeVlFWOtUHUHnWsE5l33oJPmNzT06xHiHF66eK3CedmCl2NSCZDXDAjFxKWTrW2EWLjgfIXxKqpLAFkhwQUGzOKjXlIbBL2oaF2Z22sll8NpdFZqUIv7k-WsNO9HOx70huJRmqpCUgxYe-nbJyUdNICndvseiMULntFpjJs4nUUm-lXkhDfConDUAcCddCXw5yubQLwN9qStKXw9n8Q4IQ9EXSTI4TTnbKj4W7n3qF9NdRnYSrdAyWUKAY priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812532 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3085683087 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2779351711 https://hal.science/hal-03857753 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9931338 https://doaj.org/article/76b4d2b3d6a34ad8adad2334ae643a4d |
Volume | 1 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3NbtQwELaglRAXxD-BsjKIa-jGTmLnhLZVqxWiFQIq7S1yYruJVCXLJsuZh-gT9kmYcbzpbpHgEkVx4jiZsefX3xDyIU3ltOC6CGVmJBgoMQszm8pQlJJLmSAiC25wPjtP5xfx50Wy8A63zqdVbtZEt1DrtkQf-SEH3SCViF_3afkzxKpRGF31JTTuk32ELkPjSyzE6GNhEoybLPI75riIDj2BPi51fTlAFzK2I5EccD_ImQrTIv_WOe-mTm7JotPH5JFXIulsoPoTcs80T8mDMx8mf0bK784l39HW0qJWHa0biiwyoEXQeguGk_aV6unSrEB7XoPeSasxIYzqusMahQi5evP7ekYH8BA67HZ5Ti5OT34cz0NfTSEsE572YRKLqVGiEEnsYAalUlOdGa1ZpMCqEdpkHERVZpU2YGVJLRKrOCyk1qoI7Fj-guw1bWNeEWqlKoQuyozzLIanFSssyFrDImusVjYgfPNH89JDjWPFi6vcxc8EmBzDj8qRDrmnQ0DC8anlALXxn_uPkFjjvQiU7S60q8vcz7tcpEWsGXBjqnistFRaacbh1IAqpmIdkPcV9rvVx3z2JcdrGDMVYM39igJysOGEzUi6_JYhA_JubIbJiREX1Zh23eVMwPKXRCKCLl4OjDO-iiPyW8LhM8QOS-2MZbelqSsHAA46JboWXv97WG_IQ4Z7NVzC3AHZ61dr8xY0qL6YuGkCR3kcTcj-0cn5128T5434A5ToI6k |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwELZKkYAL4rcEChgEx9CNncTOAaGlUG3pbi-0Um_Gie0mEkqWzS6IGw_Bc_BQPAkz-WMXJDj1tsqP17HH4288M98Q8iyO5SjlJvVlYiUYKCHzExdLX2SSSxkhIwsmOM-O48lp-O4sOtsiP_pcGAyr7HVio6hNleEZ-R4HbBBL5K97Nf_kY9Uo9K72JTRasTiyX7-AyVa_PHwD8_ucsYO3J_sTv6sq4GcRj5d-FIqR1SIVUdjQ7UmtRyaxxrBAA7oXxiYcVHbitLFgbUgjIqc5KBTndAD2HId2L5HLIecCufrlfjCc6TAJxlQSdBl6XAR7nUC8mJvivKVKZGxjB2wKBcC-lmMY5t8Y989QzbW97-AGud6BVjpupewm2bLlLXJl1rnlb5PsfeMCqGnlaFromhYlRZFs2SlosUb7SZe5XtK5XQBaXwHOpfkQgEZNUWNNRKR4_fnt-5i2ZCW0za65Q04vZJzvku2yKu09Qp3UqTBplnCehPC2ZqmDvd2ywFlntPMI70dUZR21OVbY-Kgaf50AE6cdKIXzoLp58Ig_vDVvqT3-8_xrnKzhWSTmbi5Ui3PVrXMl4jQ0DKQ_1jzURmqjDePw0wL006HxyNMc211rYzKeKryGPloB1uPnwCO7vST0PanV7wXgkSfDbVAG6OHRpa1WtWIC1G0UiACa2GkFZ_grjkxzEYfPEBsitdGXzTtlkTeE44Bh8Sjj_r-79ZhcnZzMpmp6eHz0gFxjmCfSBOvtku3lYmUfAnpbpo-aJUPJh4teo78AQU1cHA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sources+of+bias+in+artificial+intelligence+that+perpetuate+healthcare+disparities%E2%80%94A+global+review&rft.jtitle=PLOS+digital+health&rft.au=Celi%2C+Leo+Anthony&rft.au=Cellini%2C+Jacqueline&rft.au=Charpignon%2C+Marie-Laure&rft.au=Dee%2C+Edward+Christopher&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science&rft.eissn=2767-3170&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0000022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pdig.0000022 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2767-3170&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2767-3170&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2767-3170&client=summon |