Suggestive answers strategy in human-chatbot interaction: a route to engaged critical decision making
In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the suggestive ending of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending narrative technique, which ends a story without specifying conclusions to spark readers' curiosity as to what will happen next and is of...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in psychology Vol. 15; p. 1382234 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
28.03.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the
suggestive ending
of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending narrative technique, which ends a story without specifying conclusions to spark readers' curiosity as to what will happen next and is often used in television series. Common chatbots provide relevant and comprehensive answers to users' questions. In contrast, chatbots with our proposed strategy end their answers with hints potentially interest-triggering users. The suggestive ending strategy aims to stimulate users' inquisition for critical decision-making, relating to a psychological phenomenon where humans are often urged to finish the uncompleted tasks they have initiated. We demonstrated the implication of our strategy by conducting an online user study involving 300 participants, where they used chatbots to perform three decision-making tasks. We adopted a between-subjects factorial experimental design and compared between the following UIs: (1)
plain
chatbot—it provides a generated answer when participants issue a question; (2)
expositive
chatbot—it provides a generated answer for a question, adding short summaries of a positive and negative person's opinion for the answer; (3)
suggestive
chatbot—it provides a generated answer for a question, which ends with a suggestion of a positive and negative person for the answer. We found that users of the
suggestive
chatbot were inclined to ask more questions to the bot, engage in prolonged decision-making and information-seeking actions, and formulate their opinions from various perspectives. These findings vary with the users' experience with
plain
and
expositive
chatbots. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the
of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending narrative technique, which ends a story without specifying conclusions to spark readers' curiosity as to what will happen next and is often used in television series. Common chatbots provide relevant and comprehensive answers to users' questions. In contrast, chatbots with our proposed strategy end their answers with hints potentially interest-triggering users. The suggestive ending strategy aims to stimulate users' inquisition for critical decision-making, relating to a psychological phenomenon where humans are often urged to finish the uncompleted tasks they have initiated. We demonstrated the implication of our strategy by conducting an online user study involving 300 participants, where they used chatbots to perform three decision-making tasks. We adopted a between-subjects factorial experimental design and compared between the following UIs: (1)
chatbot-it provides a generated answer when participants issue a question; (2)
chatbot-it provides a generated answer for a question, adding short summaries of a positive and negative person's opinion for the answer; (3)
chatbot-it provides a generated answer for a question, which ends with a suggestion of a positive and negative person for the answer. We found that users of the
chatbot were inclined to ask more questions to the bot, engage in prolonged decision-making and information-seeking actions, and formulate their opinions from various perspectives. These findings vary with the users' experience with
and
chatbots. In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the suggestive ending of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending narrative technique, which ends a story without specifying conclusions to spark readers' curiosity as to what will happen next and is often used in television series. Common chatbots provide relevant and comprehensive answers to users' questions. In contrast, chatbots with our proposed strategy end their answers with hints potentially interest-triggering users. The suggestive ending strategy aims to stimulate users' inquisition for critical decision-making, relating to a psychological phenomenon where humans are often urged to finish the uncompleted tasks they have initiated. We demonstrated the implication of our strategy by conducting an online user study involving 300 participants, where they used chatbots to perform three decision-making tasks. We adopted a between-subjects factorial experimental design and compared between the following UIs: (1) plain chatbot—it provides a generated answer when participants issue a question; (2) expositive chatbot—it provides a generated answer for a question, adding short summaries of a positive and negative person's opinion for the answer; (3) suggestive chatbot—it provides a generated answer for a question, which ends with a suggestion of a positive and negative person for the answer. We found that users of the suggestive chatbot were inclined to ask more questions to the bot, engage in prolonged decision-making and information-seeking actions, and formulate their opinions from various perspectives. These findings vary with the users' experience with plain and expositive chatbots. In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the suggestive ending of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending narrative technique, which ends a story without specifying conclusions to spark readers' curiosity as to what will happen next and is often used in television series. Common chatbots provide relevant and comprehensive answers to users' questions. In contrast, chatbots with our proposed strategy end their answers with hints potentially interest-triggering users. The suggestive ending strategy aims to stimulate users' inquisition for critical decision-making, relating to a psychological phenomenon where humans are often urged to finish the uncompleted tasks they have initiated. We demonstrated the implication of our strategy by conducting an online user study involving 300 participants, where they used chatbots to perform three decision-making tasks. We adopted a between-subjects factorial experimental design and compared between the following UIs: (1) plain chatbot-it provides a generated answer when participants issue a question; (2) expositive chatbot-it provides a generated answer for a question, adding short summaries of a positive and negative person's opinion for the answer; (3) suggestive chatbot-it provides a generated answer for a question, which ends with a suggestion of a positive and negative person for the answer. We found that users of the suggestive chatbot were inclined to ask more questions to the bot, engage in prolonged decision-making and information-seeking actions, and formulate their opinions from various perspectives. These findings vary with the users' experience with plain and expositive chatbots.In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the suggestive ending of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending narrative technique, which ends a story without specifying conclusions to spark readers' curiosity as to what will happen next and is often used in television series. Common chatbots provide relevant and comprehensive answers to users' questions. In contrast, chatbots with our proposed strategy end their answers with hints potentially interest-triggering users. The suggestive ending strategy aims to stimulate users' inquisition for critical decision-making, relating to a psychological phenomenon where humans are often urged to finish the uncompleted tasks they have initiated. We demonstrated the implication of our strategy by conducting an online user study involving 300 participants, where they used chatbots to perform three decision-making tasks. We adopted a between-subjects factorial experimental design and compared between the following UIs: (1) plain chatbot-it provides a generated answer when participants issue a question; (2) expositive chatbot-it provides a generated answer for a question, adding short summaries of a positive and negative person's opinion for the answer; (3) suggestive chatbot-it provides a generated answer for a question, which ends with a suggestion of a positive and negative person for the answer. We found that users of the suggestive chatbot were inclined to ask more questions to the bot, engage in prolonged decision-making and information-seeking actions, and formulate their opinions from various perspectives. These findings vary with the users' experience with plain and expositive chatbots. In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the suggestive ending of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending narrative technique, which ends a story without specifying conclusions to spark readers' curiosity as to what will happen next and is often used in television series. Common chatbots provide relevant and comprehensive answers to users' questions. In contrast, chatbots with our proposed strategy end their answers with hints potentially interest-triggering users. The suggestive ending strategy aims to stimulate users' inquisition for critical decision-making, relating to a psychological phenomenon where humans are often urged to finish the uncompleted tasks they have initiated. We demonstrated the implication of our strategy by conducting an online user study involving 300 participants, where they used chatbots to perform three decision-making tasks. We adopted a between-subjects factorial experimental design and compared between the following UIs: (1) plain chatbot—it provides a generated answer when participants issue a question; (2) expositive chatbot—it provides a generated answer for a question, adding short summaries of a positive and negative person's opinion for the answer; (3) suggestive chatbot—it provides a generated answer for a question, which ends with a suggestion of a positive and negative person for the answer. We found that users of the suggestive chatbot were inclined to ask more questions to the bot, engage in prolonged decision-making and information-seeking actions, and formulate their opinions from various perspectives. These findings vary with the users' experience with plain and expositive chatbots. |
Author | Yamamoto, Yusuke |
AuthorAffiliation | School of Data Science, Nagoya City University , Nagoya , Japan |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: School of Data Science, Nagoya City University , Nagoya , Japan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yusuke surname: Yamamoto fullname: Yamamoto, Yusuke |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38605834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kk1v1DAQhiNUREvpH-CAfOSyi7-SOFwQqvioVIkDcLYm9iTrktiL7bTaf4-3u0UtB3yxPX7nGWvmfVmd-OCxql4zuhZCde-GbdqNa065XDOhOBfyWXXGmkauGG3VyaPzaXWR0g0tS1JOKX9RnQrV0FoJeVbh92UcMWV3iwR8usOYSMoRMo474jzZLDP4ldlA7kMugYwRTHbBvydAYlgykhwI-hFGtMREl52BiVg0LhUVmeGX8-Or6vkAU8KL435e_fz86cfl19X1ty9Xlx-vV6YWdV4NgvfKdIPsrVWDsr3F3tYDKxcraEsZ48qaFmvV4KC4rNVAGWUgJDLZAYrz6urAtQFu9Da6GeJOB3D6PhDiqCGWH06ogbNWcFFj3aLEgSrgArseGLSmbQQrrA8H1nbpZ7QGfWnL9AT69MW7jR7DrWaM0pa1tBDeHgkx_F5Kk_XsksFpAo9hSVpQoSRvVLeXvnlc7G-Vh0EVgToITAwpRRy0cRn2gyi13aQZ1Xtb6Htb6L0t9NEWJZX_k_pA_0_SH8CEvoI |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2025_e42077 |
Cites_doi | 10.1145/3524458.3547222 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.173 10.1080/07294360.2014.892477 10.1145/3406522.3446025 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771948 10.1037/ppm0000392 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089 10.1145/3176349.3176377 10.1145/3406522.3446012 10.1145/3476415.3476428 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 10.1002/asi.22758 10.1145/3383583.3398519 10.18653/v1/D15-1050 10.1186/s41235-021-00291-4 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 10.1145/3449287 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006 10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8 10.1080/10691316.2018.1480444 10.1353/pla.2004.0055 10.1145/3295750.3298952 10.1145/2984511.2984584 10.1145/3524458.3547231 10.2307/1165312 10.1177/016146811912101102 10.1145/3375627.3375833 10.1145/3539618.3591871 10.1027/1864-9335/a000256 10.2139/ssrn.4498671 10.1177/1745691617702496 10.1145/3494522 10.1145/3406522.3446023 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2024 Yamamoto. Copyright © 2024 Yamamoto. 2024 Yamamoto |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2024 Yamamoto. – notice: Copyright © 2024 Yamamoto. 2024 Yamamoto |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382234 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Psychology |
EISSN | 1664-1078 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_a2173235e57e4ef08a23e9ba1a7c7631 PMC11007170 38605834 10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1382234 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 9T4 AAFWJ AAKDD AAYXX ABIVO ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACXDI ADBBV ADRAZ AEGXH AFPKN AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION DIK EBS EJD EMOBN F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE KQ8 M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT RNS RPM IAO ICO IEA IHR IHW IPNFZ IPY NPM RIG 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-f32b8c9f4bdd8f8dbdebd5f1d8fd30701128dc7e586ef82458f0101a34e149ae3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1664-1078 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:24:05 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:34:30 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:09:08 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:36:27 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:38:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:57 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | chatbot human-AI interaction large language model behavior change critical information-seeking |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2024 Yamamoto. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c535t-f32b8c9f4bdd8f8dbdebd5f1d8fd30701128dc7e586ef82458f0101a34e149ae3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Matthias Wölfel, Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences, Germany Edited by: Martina Rau, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States Reviewed by: Thomas Neumayr, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Austria |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382234 |
PMID | 38605834 |
PQID | 3038426890 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a2173235e57e4ef08a23e9ba1a7c7631 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11007170 proquest_miscellaneous_3038426890 pubmed_primary_38605834 crossref_citationtrail_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1382234 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1382234 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-03-28 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-03-28 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2024 text: 2024-03-28 day: 28 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland |
PublicationTitle | Frontiers in psychology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Front Psychol |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Frontiers Media S.A |
Publisher_xml | – name: Frontiers Media S.A |
References | White (B63) 2013 Ross (B47) 2010 Brodsky (B5) 2021; 6 Wei (B62) 2021 Lewins (B27) 2014 Yamamoto (B68) 2018 Yamamoto (B69) 2020 Saito (B49) 2020 Benjamini (B4) 2000; 25 Oppenheimer (B42) 2009; 45 Carr (B9) 2014 Meola (B34) 2004; 4 Metzler (B35) 2021; 55 Petridis (B44) 2023 Thaler (B57) 2009 Wang (B60) 2023 Wirz (B66) 2023; 12 Wambsganss (B58) 2021 Nakano (B38) 2022 Wambsganss (B59) 2020 Lundberg (B31) 2017 Xu (B67) 2023 Arnold (B2) 2016 Odijk (B40) 2015 Arnold (B1) 2020 Liu (B30) 2022 Zimmerman (B70) 2019 Ennis (B11) 1987 Liao (B28) 2014 Caraban (B8) 2019 Wineburg (B65) 2019; 121 Zylowski (B71) 2023 Lee (B26) 2015; 34 Goddard (B13) 2011; 19 Lakkaraju (B25) 2020 Sun (B52) 2022 Hertwig (B15) 2017; 12 Rinott (B46) 2015 Câmara (B7) 2021 Fisher (B12) 2019; 20 Musgrove (B36) 2018; 25 Suzuki (B54) 2022 Kittur (B23) 2008 Liao (B29) 2015 Kim (B21) 2016 Petty (B45) 1986; 19 Azzopardi (B3) 2021 Komarov (B24) 2013 Tay (B55) 2022 Jakesch (B18) 2023 Kasneci (B20) 2023; 103 Sharma (B50) 2024 Maynez (B33) 2020 Noyes (B39) 2007 Kahneman (B19) 2011 Suzuki (B53) 2021; 12 Ihoriya (B17) 2022 Lutz (B32) 2016; 47 Wang (B61) 2013 Harvey (B14) 2015 Roy (B48) 2021 Buçinca (B6) 2021; 5 Team (B56) 2023 Peer (B43) 2017; 70 King (B22) 1992; 27 Hettiachchi (B16) 2022; 55 Wilson (B64) 2013; 64 Shimizu (B51) 2022 Danry (B10) 2023 Okuse (B41) 2023 Najork (B37) 2023 |
References_xml | – start-page: 1 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good, GoodIT '22 year: 2022 ident: B54 article-title: “Don't judge by looks: Search user interface to make searchers reflect on their relevance criteria and promote content-quality-oriented web searches doi: 10.1145/3524458.3547222 – start-page: 128 volume-title: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '20 year: 2020 ident: B1 article-title: “Predictive text encourages predictable writing – start-page: 1906 year: 2020 ident: B33 article-title: “On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization publication-title: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '20 doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.173 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '23 year: 2023 ident: B18 article-title: “Co-writing with opinionated language models affects users” views – volume: 34 start-page: 131 year: 2015 ident: B26 article-title: Does higher education foster critical and creative learners? An exploration of two universities in South Korea and the USA publication-title: Higher Educ. Res. Dev doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.892477 – start-page: 568 volume-title: Proceedings of the 25th HCI International Conference, HCII '23 year: 2023 ident: B41 article-title: “Chatbot to facilitate opinion formation in web search – start-page: 17 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII '22 year: 2022 ident: B17 article-title: “Mitigating position bias in review search results with aspect indicator for loss aversion – start-page: 229 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR '21 year: 2021 ident: B48 article-title: “Note the highlight: Incorporating active reading tools in a search as learning environment doi: 10.1145/3406522.3446025 – volume: 12 start-page: 1 year: 2021 ident: B53 article-title: Characterizing the influence of confirmation bias on web search behavior publication-title: Front. Psychol doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771948 – volume: 12 start-page: 186 year: 2023 ident: B66 article-title: The role of cliffhangers in serial entertainment: An experiment on cliffhangers' effects on enjoyment, arousal, and intention to continue watching publication-title: Psychol. Popular Media doi: 10.1037/ppm0000392 – volume: 19 start-page: 121 year: 2011 ident: B13 article-title: Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators publication-title: J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089 – volume: 20 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: B12 article-title: All models are wrong, but many are useful: Learning a variable's importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously publication-title: J. Mach. Learn. Res – start-page: 1 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '20 year: 2020 ident: B59 article-title: “Al: an adaptive learning support system for argumentation skills – year: 2023 ident: B60 – year: 2021 ident: B62 article-title: Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners publication-title: arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '23 year: 2023 ident: B44 article-title: “Anglekindling: supporting journalistic angle ideation with large language models – start-page: 133 volume-title: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '15 year: 2015 ident: B14 article-title: “Learning by example: training users with high-quality query suggestions – start-page: 453 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '08 year: 2008 ident: B23 article-title: “Crowdsourcing user studies with mechanical turk – start-page: 12 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR '18 year: 2018 ident: B68 article-title: “Query priming for promoting critical thinking in web search doi: 10.1145/3176349.3176377 – start-page: 2288 volume-title: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS '16 year: 2016 ident: B21 article-title: “Examples are not enough, learn to criticize! criticism for interpretability – year: 2023 ident: B56 – start-page: 209 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR '21 year: 2021 ident: B7 article-title: “Searching to learn with instructional scaffolding doi: 10.1145/3406522.3446012 – start-page: 763 volume-title: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '13 Companion year: 2013 ident: B61 article-title: “Privacy nudges for social media: an exploratory facebook study – volume: 55 start-page: 1 year: 2021 ident: B35 article-title: Rethinking search: Making domain experts out of dilettantes publication-title: SIGIR Forum doi: 10.1145/3476415.3476428 – year: 2024 ident: B50 – start-page: 212 volume-title: 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '22 year: 2022 ident: B52 article-title: “Investigating explainability of generative ai for code through scenario-based design – start-page: 1 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '21 year: 2021 ident: B58 article-title: “Arguetutor: an adaptive dialog-based learning system for argumentation skills – start-page: 73 volume-title: Decision Making in Complex Environments year: 2007 ident: B39 article-title: “Automation and decision making – start-page: 1 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '23 year: 2023 ident: B10 article-title: “Don't just tell me, ask me: Ai systems that intelligently frame explanations as questions improve human logical discernment accuracy over causal ai explanations – volume: 103 start-page: 102274 year: 2023 ident: B20 article-title: Chatgpt for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education publication-title: Learning Indiv. Differ doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 – year: 2022 ident: B38 – start-page: 9 volume-title: Series of books in psychology. Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice year: 1987 ident: B11 article-title: “A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities – volume: 64 start-page: 291 year: 2013 ident: B64 article-title: A comparison of techniques for measuring sensemaking and learning within participant-generated summaries publication-title: J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol doi: 10.1002/asi.22758 – start-page: 37 volume-title: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, JCDL '20 year: 2020 ident: B69 article-title: “Personalization finder: A search interface for identifying and self-controlling web search personalization doi: 10.1145/3383583.3398519 – start-page: 440 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing year: 2015 ident: B46 article-title: “Show me your evidence - an automatic method for context dependent evidence detection doi: 10.18653/v1/D15-1050 – volume: 6 start-page: 1 year: 2021 ident: B5 article-title: Improving college students' fact-checking strategies through lateral reading instruction in a general education civics course publication-title: Cogn. Res doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00291-4 – volume: 45 start-page: 867 year: 2009 ident: B42 article-title: Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power publication-title: J. Exper. Soc. Psychol doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 – start-page: 168 year: 2023 ident: B71 article-title: “An NLP analysis of ChatGPT's personality simulation capabilities and implications for human-centric explainable AI interfaces publication-title: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Natural Language and Speech Processing, ICNLSP '23 – volume: 5 start-page: 1 year: 2021 ident: B6 article-title: To trust or to think: Cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on ai in ai-assisted decision-making publication-title: Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Inter doi: 10.1145/3449287 – volume: 70 start-page: 153 year: 2017 ident: B43 article-title: Beyond the turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research publication-title: J. Exper. Soc. Psychol doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006 – volume: 27 start-page: 111 year: 1992 ident: B22 article-title: Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning publication-title: Educ. Psychol doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8 – volume-title: Thinking, Fast and Slow year: 2011 ident: B19 – start-page: 1439 volume-title: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '15 year: 2015 ident: B29 article-title: “It is all about perspective: An exploration of mitigating selective exposure with aspect indicators – start-page: 3 volume-title: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '13 year: 2013 ident: B63 article-title: “Beliefs and biases in web search – volume: 25 start-page: 243 year: 2018 ident: B36 article-title: Real or fake? Resources for teaching college students how to identify fake news publication-title: College Undergr. Libr doi: 10.1080/10691316.2018.1480444 – volume: 4 start-page: 331 year: 2004 ident: B34 article-title: Chucking the checklist: a contextual approach to teaching undergraduates web-site evaluation publication-title: Portal doi: 10.1353/pla.2004.0055 – start-page: 283 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR '19 year: 2019 ident: B70 article-title: “Privacy nudging in search: Investigating potential impacts doi: 10.1145/3295750.3298952 – start-page: 603 volume-title: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '16 year: 2016 ident: B2 article-title: “On suggesting phrases vs. predicting words for mobile text composition doi: 10.1145/2984511.2984584 – start-page: 424 volume-title: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE '20 year: 2020 ident: B49 article-title: “Highlighting weasel sentences for promoting critical information seeking on the web – start-page: 24 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good, GoodIT '22 year: 2022 ident: B51 article-title: “Privacy-aware snippets: Enhancing assessment of balance between privacy risks and benefits in web search doi: 10.1145/3524458.3547231 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '22 year: 2022 ident: B30 article-title: “Crystalline: Lowering the cost for developers to collect and organize information for decision making – start-page: 1551 volume-title: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '15 year: 2015 ident: B40 article-title: “Struggling and success in web search – volume: 25 start-page: 60 year: 2000 ident: B4 article-title: On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics publication-title: J. Educ. Behav. Stat doi: 10.2307/1165312 – volume: 121 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: B65 article-title: Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information publication-title: Teach. College Rec doi: 10.1177/016146811912101102 – start-page: 79 volume-title: Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES '20 year: 2020 ident: B25 article-title: “How do i fool you?”: Manipulating user trust via misleading black box explanations doi: 10.1145/3375627.3375833 – start-page: 2863 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '10 year: 2010 ident: B47 article-title: “Who are the crowdworkers? shifting demographics in mechanical turk – volume-title: Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '23 year: 2023 ident: B37 article-title: “Generative information retrieval doi: 10.1145/3539618.3591871 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '19 year: 2019 ident: B8 article-title: “23 ways to nudge: a review of technology-mediated nudging in human-computer interaction – volume-title: The Glass Cage: How Our Computers are Changing Us year: 2014 ident: B9 – volume: 47 start-page: 38 year: 2016 ident: B32 article-title: The validity of crowdsourcing data in studying anger and aggressive behavior publication-title: Soc. Psychol doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000256 – volume-title: Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-By-Step Guide year: 2014 ident: B27 – start-page: 207 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '13 year: 2013 ident: B24 article-title: “Crowdsourcing performance evaluations of user interfaces – year: 2023 ident: B67 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4498671 – volume-title: Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness year: 2009 ident: B57 – start-page: 184 volume-title: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '14 year: 2014 ident: B28 article-title: “Can you hear me now? mitigating the echo chamber effect by source position indicators – volume: 12 start-page: 973 year: 2017 ident: B15 article-title: Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions publication-title: Perspect. Psychol. Sci doi: 10.1177/1745691617702496 – volume: 55 start-page: 1 year: 2022 ident: B16 article-title: A survey on task assignment in crowdsourcing publication-title: ACM Comput. Surv doi: 10.1145/3494522 – start-page: 27 volume-title: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR '21 year: 2021 ident: B3 article-title: “Cognitive biases in search: a review and reflection of cognitive biases in information retrieval doi: 10.1145/3406522.3446023 – start-page: 4768 volume-title: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS '17 year: 2017 ident: B31 article-title: “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions – volume: 19 start-page: 123 year: 1986 ident: B45 article-title: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion publication-title: Adv. Exper. Soc. Psychol doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2 – start-page: 21831 year: 2022 ident: B55 article-title: Transformer memory as a differentiable search index publication-title: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS'22 |
SSID | ssj0000402002 |
Score | 2.37939 |
Snippet | In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the
suggestive ending
of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending... In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending narrative... In this study, we proposed a novel chatbot interaction strategy based on the suggestive ending of answers. This strategy is inspired by the cliffhanger ending... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1382234 |
SubjectTerms | behavior change chatbot critical information-seeking human-AI interaction large language model Psychology |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LTxsxELYQJy5VC5SmBWSk3tBC4kfWyw1QEeLApSBxs_wYB6R2N0o2h_z7zniXKEFVufS4L-3I8_zk8TeMfccKVYYUU1EFXxYqJo8-l8rCay28jFgTQO62uB_fPqq7J_20NuqLesI6euBu4c4d1sxSSA26BAVpaJyQUHk3cmVA38jAB3PeGpjKMZhgEbXu0CkZRGHVeZrOlxPEg0KdEe2ekGojE2XC_r9VmW-bJdeyz81H9qEvG_llJ-4ntgX1LttZRa_lHoOfiwntFWH04ph-aPYZn3fUs0v-UvM8jK8Iz671TcuJJWLWnWm44I7PmkULvG041BMMMJGHfgICj_0MHv47j63aZ483Px6ub4t-hkIRtNRtkaTwJlRJ-RhNMtFH8FGnEV5Ecncst0wMJWgzhmSE0iYR65yTChA7OZCf2Xbd1PCFcaIWGwlRhbFxKrrKDJ2uUJsqAGKopAds9LqeNvQE4zTn4pdFoEE6sFkHlnRgex0M2Onqm2lHr_HPt69ITas3iRo730CDsb3B2PcMZsBOXpVs0ZVof8TV0CzmFrO5wYLFVMMBO-iUvvqVNLR_TCKYDXPYkGXzSf3ynOm6iZQPQfPw6_-Q_hvboRWhLjhhDtl2O1vAEZZFrT_OHvAHnn0NPQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Suggestive answers strategy in human-chatbot interaction: a route to engaged critical decision making |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38605834 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3038426890 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11007170 https://doaj.org/article/a2173235e57e4ef08a23e9ba1a7c7631 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELZKufSCyntbqIzEDaVs_EgcpKoCRFUhwQVW6s3yc1upJCWblbr_nhnHu2JRQRyTOInjsWfmi-3vI-Q1ZKjcRR-Lxtm6ED5aGHOxLqyUzHIPOUFIqy2-Vucz8flCXuyQtdxRbsDFndAO9aRm_fXx7c_VKQz4E0ScEG_fxpvFag5Qj4ljZNRjXNwj9yEy1aho8CWn-8kzI1galyFWlQAPVKtxH81fHrMVqxKl_1156J_LKX-LT2f75EFOLOn7sSc8JDuhfUT2Nv5t9ZiEb8s5ziaBf6MQoFAdjS5GctoVvWppkusr3KUZbDdQ5JHox10P76ihfbccAh06Gto5uCBPXdZIoD6r9NAfSdjqCZmdffr-8bzIKguFk1wOReTMKtdEYb1XUXnrg_UylnDg0SFAQqa8q4NUVYiKCaki8tIZLgKgKxP4U7Lbdm14TiiSj5WMNa5SRnjTqKmRDdhbuAAoK8oJKdftqV2mIEcljGsNUARtoJMNNNpAZxtMyJvNPTcjAcc_S39AM21KInl2OtH1c53HojYAwzjjMsg6iBCnyjAeGmtKUztwt-WEvFobWcNgwxkU04ZuudAQ7xWkNKqZTsiz0eibV3GFM8xYBbXVHbbqsn2lvbpMhN5I2wewenrwHy8-JHv4wbgMjqkXZHfol-El5EWDPUr_E45Sl_8FS4UOFA |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suggestive+answers+strategy+in+human-chatbot+interaction%3A+a+route+to+engaged+critical+decision+making&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+psychology&rft.au=Yamamoto%2C+Yusuke&rft.date=2024-03-28&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft.volume=15&rft.spage=1382234&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2024.1382234&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1664-1078&client=summon |