Comparison of Feature Learning Methods for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors

Getting a good feature representation of data is paramount for Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensors. An increasing number of feature learning approaches—in particular deep-learning based—have been proposed to extract an effective feature representation by analyzing large amounts o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 18; no. 2; p. 679
Main Authors Li, Frédéric, Shirahama, Kimiaki, Nisar, Muhammad, Köping, Lukas, Grzegorzek, Marcin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 24.02.2018
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI10.3390/s18020679

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Getting a good feature representation of data is paramount for Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable sensors. An increasing number of feature learning approaches—in particular deep-learning based—have been proposed to extract an effective feature representation by analyzing large amounts of data. However, getting an objective interpretation of their performances faces two problems: the lack of a baseline evaluation setup, which makes a strict comparison between them impossible, and the insufficiency of implementation details, which can hinder their use. In this paper, we attempt to address both issues: we firstly propose an evaluation framework allowing a rigorous comparison of features extracted by different methods, and use it to carry out extensive experiments with state-of-the-art feature learning approaches. We then provide all the codes and implementation details to make both the reproduction of the results reported in this paper and the re-use of our framework easier for other researchers. Our studies carried out on the OPPORTUNITY and UniMiB-SHAR datasets highlight the effectiveness of hybrid deep-learning architectures involving convolutional and Long-Short-Term-Memory (LSTM) to obtain features characterising both short- and long-term time dependencies in the data.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s18020679