A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and acceptability of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression

Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have reported conflicting evidence concerning its overall efficacy, which might have resulted from low statistical power. Thus, meta-analytical a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychological medicine Vol. 43; no. 11; pp. 2245 - 2254
Main Authors Berlim, M. T., Van den Eynde, F., Daskalakis, Z. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.11.2013
Subjects
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Antidepressant drugs
Biological and medical sciences
Depression
Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy
Efficacy
Heterogeneity
Humans
Medical sciences
Mental depression
Meta-analysis
Miscellaneous
Mood disorders
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Statistical power
Stimulation
Systematic review
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods
Treatment Outcome
meta-analysis
bilateral rTMS
transcranial magnetic stimulation
Acceptability
efficacy
major depression
Mood disorder
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Central nervous system
Depression
Review
Encephalon
Metaanalysis
Treatment
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have reported conflicting evidence concerning its overall efficacy, which might have resulted from low statistical power. Thus, meta-analytical approaches could be useful in examining this issue by allowing the integration of findings from multiple studies and thus producing more accurate estimates of the treatment effect. We searched the literature for randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) on bilateral rTMS for treating MD from 1995 to July 2012 using EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and from October 2008 until May 2012 using Medline. The main outcome measures were response and remission rates. We used a random-effects model, odds ratios (ORs) and the number needed to treat. Data were obtained from seven RCTs, totaling 279 subjects with MD. After an average of 12.9 (s.d. = 2.7) sessions, 24.7% (40/162) and 6.8% (8/117) of subjects receiving active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS were classified as responders [OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-9.52, p < 0.0001]. Also, 19% (23/121) and 2.6% (2/77) of subjects were remitters following active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS, respectively (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.65-21.8, p = 0.006). No difference between baseline mean depression scores for the bilateral and sham rTMS groups was found, and the former was comparable with the latter in terms of drop-out rates at study end. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences efficacy- and acceptability-wise between active bilateral and unilateral rTMS at study end. Finally, heterogeneity between the included RCTs was not significant, and the risk of publication bias was found to be low. Bilateral rTMS is a promising treatment for MD as it provides clinically meaningful benefits that are comparable with those of standard antidepressants and unilateral rTMS. Furthermore, bilateral rTMS seems to be an acceptable treatment for depressed subjects.
AbstractList Background Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have reported conflicting evidence concerning its overall efficacy, which might have resulted from low statistical power. Thus, meta-analytical approaches could be useful in examining this issue by allowing the integration of findings from multiple studies and thus producing more accurate estimates of the treatment effect. Method We searched the literature for randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) on bilateral rTMS for treating MD from 1995 to July 2012 using EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and from October 2008 until May 2012 using Medline. The main outcome measures were response and remission rates. We used a random-effects model, odds ratios (ORs) and the number needed to treat. Results Data were obtained from seven RCTs, totaling 279 subjects with MD. After an average of 12.9 (s.d. = 2.7) sessions, 24.7% (40/162) and 6.8% (8/117) of subjects receiving active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS were classified as responders [OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-9.52, p < 0.0001]. Also, 19% (23/121) and 2.6% (2/77) of subjects were remitters following active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS, respectively (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.65-21.8, p = 0.006). No difference between baseline mean depression scores for the bilateral and sham rTMS groups was found, and the former was comparable with the latter in terms of drop-out rates at study end. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences efficacy- and acceptability-wise between active bilateral and unilateral rTMS at study end. Finally, heterogeneity between the included RCTs was not significant, and the risk of publication bias was found to be low. Conclusions Bilateral rTMS is a promising treatment for MD as it provides clinically meaningful benefits that are comparable with those of standard antidepressants and unilateral rTMS. Furthermore, bilateral rTMS seems to be an acceptable treatment for depressed subjects.
Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have reported conflicting evidence concerning its overall efficacy, which might have resulted from low statistical power. Thus, meta-analytical approaches could be useful in examining this issue by allowing the integration of findings from multiple studies and thus producing more accurate estimates of the treatment effect. We searched the literature for randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) on bilateral rTMS for treating MD from 1995 to July 2012 using EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and from October 2008 until May 2012 using Medline. The main outcome measures were response and remission rates. We used a random-effects model, odds ratios (ORs) and the number needed to treat. Data were obtained from seven RCTs, totaling 279 subjects with MD. After an average of 12.9 (s.d. = 2.7) sessions, 24.7% (40/162) and 6.8% (8/117) of subjects receiving active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS were classified as responders [OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-9.52, p < 0.0001]. Also, 19% (23/121) and 2.6% (2/77) of subjects were remitters following active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS, respectively (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.65-21.8, p = 0.006). No difference between baseline mean depression scores for the bilateral and sham rTMS groups was found, and the former was comparable with the latter in terms of drop-out rates at study end. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences efficacy- and acceptability-wise between active bilateral and unilateral rTMS at study end. Finally, heterogeneity between the included RCTs was not significant, and the risk of publication bias was found to be low. Bilateral rTMS is a promising treatment for MD as it provides clinically meaningful benefits that are comparable with those of standard antidepressants and unilateral rTMS. Furthermore, bilateral rTMS seems to be an acceptable treatment for depressed subjects.
Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have reported conflicting evidence concerning its overall efficacy, which might have resulted from low statistical power. Thus, meta-analytical approaches could be useful in examining this issue by allowing the integration of findings from multiple studies and thus producing more accurate estimates of the treatment effect.BACKGROUNDBilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have reported conflicting evidence concerning its overall efficacy, which might have resulted from low statistical power. Thus, meta-analytical approaches could be useful in examining this issue by allowing the integration of findings from multiple studies and thus producing more accurate estimates of the treatment effect.We searched the literature for randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) on bilateral rTMS for treating MD from 1995 to July 2012 using EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and from October 2008 until May 2012 using Medline. The main outcome measures were response and remission rates. We used a random-effects model, odds ratios (ORs) and the number needed to treat.METHODWe searched the literature for randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) on bilateral rTMS for treating MD from 1995 to July 2012 using EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and from October 2008 until May 2012 using Medline. The main outcome measures were response and remission rates. We used a random-effects model, odds ratios (ORs) and the number needed to treat.Data were obtained from seven RCTs, totaling 279 subjects with MD. After an average of 12.9 (s.d. = 2.7) sessions, 24.7% (40/162) and 6.8% (8/117) of subjects receiving active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS were classified as responders [OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-9.52, p < 0.0001]. Also, 19% (23/121) and 2.6% (2/77) of subjects were remitters following active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS, respectively (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.65-21.8, p = 0.006). No difference between baseline mean depression scores for the bilateral and sham rTMS groups was found, and the former was comparable with the latter in terms of drop-out rates at study end. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences efficacy- and acceptability-wise between active bilateral and unilateral rTMS at study end. Finally, heterogeneity between the included RCTs was not significant, and the risk of publication bias was found to be low.RESULTSData were obtained from seven RCTs, totaling 279 subjects with MD. After an average of 12.9 (s.d. = 2.7) sessions, 24.7% (40/162) and 6.8% (8/117) of subjects receiving active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS were classified as responders [OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-9.52, p < 0.0001]. Also, 19% (23/121) and 2.6% (2/77) of subjects were remitters following active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS, respectively (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.65-21.8, p = 0.006). No difference between baseline mean depression scores for the bilateral and sham rTMS groups was found, and the former was comparable with the latter in terms of drop-out rates at study end. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences efficacy- and acceptability-wise between active bilateral and unilateral rTMS at study end. Finally, heterogeneity between the included RCTs was not significant, and the risk of publication bias was found to be low.Bilateral rTMS is a promising treatment for MD as it provides clinically meaningful benefits that are comparable with those of standard antidepressants and unilateral rTMS. Furthermore, bilateral rTMS seems to be an acceptable treatment for depressed subjects.CONCLUSIONSBilateral rTMS is a promising treatment for MD as it provides clinically meaningful benefits that are comparable with those of standard antidepressants and unilateral rTMS. Furthermore, bilateral rTMS seems to be an acceptable treatment for depressed subjects.
Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have reported conflicting evidence concerning its overall efficacy, which might have resulted from low statistical power. Thus, meta-analytical approaches could be useful in examining this issue by allowing the integration of findings from multiple studies and thus producing more accurate estimates of the treatment effect. We searched the literature for randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) on bilateral rTMS for treating MD from 1995 to July 2012 using EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and from October 2008 until May 2012 using Medline. The main outcome measures were response and remission rates. We used a random-effects model, odds ratios (ORs) and the number needed to treat. Data were obtained from seven RCTs, totaling 279 subjects with MD. After an average of 12.9 (s.d. = 2.7) sessions, 24.7% (40/162) and 6.8% (8/117) of subjects receiving active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS were classified as responders [OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-9.52, p < 0.0001]. Also, 19% (23/121) and 2.6% (2/77) of subjects were remitters following active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS, respectively (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.65-21.8, p = 0.006). No difference between baseline mean depression scores for the bilateral and sham rTMS groups was found, and the former was comparable with the latter in terms of drop-out rates at study end. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences efficacy- and acceptability-wise between active bilateral and unilateral rTMS at study end. Finally, heterogeneity between the included RCTs was not significant, and the risk of publication bias was found to be low. Bilateral rTMS is a promising treatment for MD as it provides clinically meaningful benefits that are comparable with those of standard antidepressants and unilateral rTMS. Furthermore, bilateral rTMS seems to be an acceptable treatment for depressed subjects. Adapted from the source document.
Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have reported conflicting evidence concerning its overall efficacy, which might have resulted from low statistical power. Thus, meta-analytical approaches could be useful in examining this issue by allowing the integration of findings from multiple studies and thus producing more accurate estimates of the treatment effect. We searched the literature for randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) on bilateral rTMS for treating MD from 1995 to July 2012 using EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and from October 2008 until May 2012 using Medline. The main outcome measures were response and remission rates. We used a random-effects model, odds ratios (ORs) and the number needed to treat. Data were obtained from seven RCTs, totaling 279 subjects with MD. After an average of 12.9 (s.d. = 2.7) sessions, 24.7% (40/162) and 6.8% (8/117) of subjects receiving active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS were classified as responders [OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-9.52, p < 0.0001]. Also, 19% (23/121) and 2.6% (2/77) of subjects were remitters following active bilateral rTMS and sham rTMS, respectively (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.65-21.8, p = 0.006). No difference between baseline mean depression scores for the bilateral and sham rTMS groups was found, and the former was comparable with the latter in terms of drop-out rates at study end. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences efficacy- and acceptability-wise between active bilateral and unilateral rTMS at study end. Finally, heterogeneity between the included RCTs was not significant, and the risk of publication bias was found to be low. Bilateral rTMS is a promising treatment for MD as it provides clinically meaningful benefits that are comparable with those of standard antidepressants and unilateral rTMS. Furthermore, bilateral rTMS seems to be an acceptable treatment for depressed subjects.
Author Daskalakis, Z. J.
Berlim, M. T.
Van den Eynde, F.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: M. T.
  surname: Berlim
  fullname: Berlim, M. T.
  email: nrc.douglas@me.com
  organization: 1Neuromodulation Research Clinic, Douglas Mental Health University Institute and McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: F.
  surname: Van den Eynde
  fullname: Van den Eynde, F.
  organization: 1Neuromodulation Research Clinic, Douglas Mental Health University Institute and McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Z. J.
  surname: Daskalakis
  fullname: Daskalakis, Z. J.
  organization: 2Depressive Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute and McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27915029$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23200131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkstu1DAUhi1URKcDD8AGWUJI7SLgSxIny6riJhWxaFlHJ_bJ4FEug-0UzQvxnJyZTlVUBOrGt_P9vy-_T9jROI3I2Esp3kohzbsrIbRWtTRSCaEqoZ6whczLOqtqUx2xxa6c7erH7CTGtRBSy1w9Y8dKq_1kwX6d87iNCQdI3vKANx5_chgdHzBBBiP02-gjn0aeviPHrvMW7HZPgLW4SdD63qctnzpOI0gYoCefDSaf_A3yFGCMlhpP6wOsRtxtFJMfZqI9GZ-G6y9XZ7ybAsFIa-OKwDVNHW4CxkjQc_a0gz7ii0O_ZN8-vL---JRdfv34-eL8MrOFLlJWa9Rl5aRuW7pfB9CJ2uSVQdNWxjrlrGhFVbbGqDKvXecKC9IJQVVXQK71kp3e-m7C9GPGmJrBR4t9DyNOc2xkXqtSFlKVj0KLSqn6Ma60dU3OBaGvH6DraQ4Uw56iQKWSO8NXB2puB3TNJvgBwra5y5WANwcAooW-o_e3Pt5zppaFoKMtmbnlbJhiDNg11qd9LJSb7xspmt1Pa_76aaSUD5R35v_T6IMGhjZ4t8I_bvdP1W8bzuP8
CODEN PSMDCO
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41398_024_02942_8
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0186950
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2014_05_021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpr_2022_102236
crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsaa011
crossref_primary_10_1590_1414_431x20144270
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2018_03_012
crossref_primary_10_1136_gpsych_2019_100074
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2020_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_00048674241249846
crossref_primary_10_1002_mds_27705
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11920_013_0368_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2022_104848
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2015_05_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychres_2016_04_061
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_021_05730_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2016_03_010
crossref_primary_10_2147_NDT_S264813
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40359_024_01981_6
crossref_primary_10_1192_apt_bp_115_015206
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12888_022_03843_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psc_2018_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1002_gps_4982
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1690_0497
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eurpsy_2019_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2020_06_067
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2022_08_098
crossref_primary_10_1038_s44159_024_00291_3
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40001_015_0138_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pbb_2014_04_002
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2025_1513339
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2016_03_052
crossref_primary_10_1177_0706743716660033
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina61040560
crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awu109
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2024_105726
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psc_2023_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsych_2019_07_031
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_aacb96
crossref_primary_10_1111_cns_13971
crossref_primary_10_1177_0706743719839705
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2023_1237713
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychres_2017_04_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2016_11_028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2021_10_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2016_08_013
crossref_primary_10_1177_24705470211006855
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2016_08_049
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00406_014_0540_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2023_08_065
crossref_primary_10_2147_NDT_S388164
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3991619
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychres_2024_115858
crossref_primary_10_1097_YCT_0000000000000546
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_85057_w
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12888_022_03729_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2015_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1177_00048674211004344
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2020_05_055
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psc_2018_04_006
crossref_primary_10_3390_psychiatryint2030020
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00702_024_02852_5
crossref_primary_10_1176_appi_neuropsych_15030068
crossref_primary_10_1177_00048674211043047
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nec_2013_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_encep_2019_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2013_2244890
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroneuro_2021_01_062
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychres_2023_115297
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2022_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2023_08_059
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lpm_2019_01_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2022_103049
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12013_014_0162_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychres_2021_113790
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2015_08_033
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2019_05_015
crossref_primary_10_1097_YCT_0000000000000359
crossref_primary_10_1590_1516_4446_2021_1742
crossref_primary_10_1080_08039488_2018_1500640
crossref_primary_10_1177_1039856220956474
crossref_primary_10_1002_gps_5091
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2021_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2023_11_007
Cites_doi 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
10.1159/000328951
10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.1002
10.1017/S0033291702006839
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.006
10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.04.006
10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018
10.1097/00131746-200209000-00003
10.1017/S1461145702002791
10.1016/j.neucli.2009.06.004
10.1038/ncpneuro0530
10.1002/9780470743386
10.1017/S003329171000005X
10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060864
10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093735
10.1002/9780470712184
10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.88
10.3109/15622975.2010.551544
10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905
10.4088/JCP.11ac06874
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.03.009
10.1002/da.20454
10.1038/npp.2011.161
10.1002/14651858.CD003493
10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01033.x
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
10.1038/npp.2011.225
10.1002/hbm.20426
10.4088/JCP.v67n1206
10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.003
10.1192/bjp.182.6.480
10.1002/0470870168
10.4088/JCP.08m04872gre
10.1017/S0033291701004378
10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652
10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.036
10.1136/bmj.d549
10.1176/ajp.2006.163.9.1519
10.1038/npp.2009.87
10.1038/npp.2011.306
10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.09.003
10.1017/S0033291708003462
10.1159/000315439
10.1177/070674370805300909
10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1r179.x
10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46
10.1177/070674370805300902
10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01049.x
10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.017
10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00195-X
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.08.011
10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02183.x
10.3109/15622975.2011.579163
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.063
10.1016/j.pscychresns.2004.08.005
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
0-V
3V.
7QJ
7QP
7QR
7RV
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
88G
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
ALSLI
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HEHIP
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
M2M
M2O
M2S
MBDVC
NAPCQ
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
POGQB
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PRQQA
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.1017/S0033291712002802
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
Sociology Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Psychology Database
Research Library
Sociology Database
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Social Sciences
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
Sociology & Social Sciences Collection
ProQuest Central China
Health Research Premium Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Chemoreception Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Sociology
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Sociology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
ProQuest Central
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Sociology Collection
ProQuest One Social Sciences
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest One Psychology
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate M. T. Berlim et al.
Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and treatment of depression
EISSN 1469-8978
EndPage 2254
ExternalDocumentID 3092317391
23200131
27915029
10_1017_S0033291712002802
Genre Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-1D
-1F
-2P
-2V
-E.
-~6
-~N
.FH
.GJ
.XZ
0-V
08P
09C
09E
0E1
0R~
123
29P
3V.
4.4
41~
53G
5RE
5VS
6~7
74X
74Y
7RV
7X7
7~V
88E
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8R4
8R5
9M5
AAAZR
AABES
AABWE
AACJH
AAEED
AAGFV
AAKTX
AAMNQ
AARAB
AASVR
AAUIS
AAUKB
AAWTL
AAYEP
ABBXD
ABBZL
ABGDZ
ABITZ
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABKKG
ABLJU
ABMYL
ABQTM
ABQWD
ABROB
ABTCQ
ABUWG
ABVFV
ABWCF
ABXAU
ABZCX
ABZUI
ACBMC
ACCHT
ACETC
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIMK
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACQFJ
ACREK
ACUIJ
ACUYZ
ACWGA
ACYZP
ACZBM
ACZUX
ADAZD
ADBBV
ADDNB
ADFEC
ADFRT
ADGEJ
ADKIL
ADOCW
ADOVH
ADOVT
ADVJH
AEBAK
AEBPU
AEHGV
AEMTW
AENCP
AENEX
AENGE
AEPLO
AEYHU
AEYYC
AFFNX
AFFUJ
AFKQG
AFKRA
AFKSM
AFLOS
AFLVW
AFUTZ
AGABE
AGJUD
AGLWM
AGOOT
AHIPN
AHLTW
AHMBA
AHQXX
AHRGI
AIGNW
AIHIV
AIOIP
AISIE
AJ7
AJCYY
AJPFC
AJQAS
AKZCZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
ALVPG
ANPSP
AQJOH
ARABE
ARALO
ARZZG
ASOEW
ATUCA
AUXHV
AYIQA
AZGZS
AZQEC
BBLKV
BCGOX
BENPR
BESQT
BGHMG
BJBOZ
BKEYQ
BLZWO
BMAJL
BPHCQ
BQFHP
BRIRG
BVXVI
C0O
C45
CAG
CBIIA
CCPQU
CCQAD
CCUQV
CDIZJ
CFAFE
CFBFF
CGQII
CHEAL
CJCSC
COF
CS3
DC4
DOHLZ
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
EGQIC
EJD
EX3
F5P
FA8
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HEHIP
HG-
HMCUK
HST
HZ~
H~9
I.6
I.7
I.9
IH6
IOEEP
IOO
IS6
I~P
J36
J38
J3A
J5H
JHPGK
JQKCU
JVRFK
KAFGG
KC5
KCGVB
KFECR
L7B
L98
LHUNA
LW7
M-V
M1P
M2M
M2O
M2S
M7~
M8.
N4W
NAPCQ
NEJ
NIKVX
NMFBF
NZEOI
O9-
OMB
OMC
OMH
OVD
OYBOY
P2P
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
Q2X
RCA
RIG
ROL
RR0
S6-
S6U
SAAAG
SY4
T9M
TEORI
UAP
UCJ
UKHRP
UT1
UU6
VVN
WFFJZ
WH7
WOW
WQ3
WXU
WXY
WYP
YOC
YZZ
ZA5
ZCA
ZDLDU
ZGI
ZJOSE
ZMEZD
ZXP
ZYDXJ
~V1
AAKNA
AATMM
AAYXX
ABHFL
ABVKB
ABVZP
ABXHF
ACDLN
ACEJA
ACOZI
ACRPL
ADNMO
ADPDF
AEMFK
AFZFC
AGQPQ
AKMAY
ALIPV
ANOYL
CITATION
IPYYG
PHGZM
PHGZT
AGKLZ
IQODW
AAFWJ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
POGQB
PPXIY
PRQQA
7QJ
7QP
7QR
7TK
7XB
8FD
8FK
FR3
K9.
MBDVC
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-93e368d13bb001faaf097487e7b87cd2dc0b086b772649dfd5ca1d00b87d5a433
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0033-2917
1469-8978
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 16:30:37 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:05:51 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:50:25 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 07:54:30 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:32:01 EDT 2025
Wed Apr 02 07:25:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:12 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:15:46 EDT 2025
Wed Mar 13 05:55:11 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords meta-analysis
bilateral rTMS
transcranial magnetic stimulation
Acceptability
efficacy
major depression
Mood disorder
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Central nervous system
Depression
Review
Encephalon
Metaanalysis
Treatment
Language English
License https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c535t-93e368d13bb001faaf097487e7b87cd2dc0b086b772649dfd5ca1d00b87d5a433
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
PMID 23200131
PQID 1440031213
PQPubID 35753
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1492615126
proquest_miscellaneous_1492582293
proquest_miscellaneous_1443399265
proquest_journals_1440031213
pubmed_primary_23200131
pascalfrancis_primary_27915029
crossref_citationtrail_10_1017_S0033291712002802
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0033291712002802
cambridge_journals_10_1017_S0033291712002802
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Cambridge, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Cambridge, UK
– name: Cambridge
– name: England
PublicationTitle Psychological medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate Psychol. Med
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Cambridge University Press
References Fitzgerald, Hoy, Herring, McQueen, Peachey, Segrave, Maller, Hall, Daskalakis 2012; 139
Martin, Barbanoj, Schlaepfer, Thompson, Perez, Kulisevsky 2003; 182
Garcia-Toro, Salva, Daumal, Andres, Romera, Lafau, Echevarria, Mestre, Bosch, Collado, Ibarra, Aguirre 2006; 146
Kozel, George 2002; 8
Rossi, Hallett, Rossini, Pascual-Leone 2009; 120
Speer, Benson, Kimbrell, Wassermann, Willis, Herscovitch, Post 2009; 115
Burt, Lisanby, Sackeim 2002; 5
Fitzgerald, Laird, Maller, Daskalakis 2008; 29
Blumberger, Mulsant, Fitzgerald, Rajji, Ravindran, Young, Levinson, Daskalakis 2012; 13
Kito, Hasegawa, Koga 2011; 65
McNamara, Ray, Arthurs, Boniface 2001; 31
Wassermann, Zimmermann 2012; 133
Herrmann, Ebmeier 2006; 67
Salustri, Tecchio, Zappasodi, Bevacqua, Fontana, Ercolani, Milazzo, Squitti, Rossini 2007; 32
Rosa, Lisanby 2012; 37
Arns, Drinkenburg, Fitzgerald, Kenemans 2012; 5
Fergusson, Aaron, Guyatt, Hebert 2002; 325
Rush, Trivedi, Wisniewski, Nierenberg, Stewart, Warden, Niederehe, Thase, Lavori, Lebowitz, McGrath, Rosenbaum, Sackeim, Kupfer, Luther, Fava 2006; 163
Gross, Nakamura, Pascual-Leone, Fregni 2007; 116
Marangell, Martinez, Jurdi, Zboyan 2007; 116
Couturier 2005; 30
Duval, Tweedie 2000; 56
Allan, Herrmann, Ebmeier 2011; 64
Fitzgerald, Hoy, Daskalakis, Kulkarni 2009; 26
Fitzgerald, Oxley, Laird, Kulkarni, Egan, Daskalakis 2006; 148
Berlim, Turecki 2007; 17
Rotenberg 2008; 32
Martinot, Martinot, Ringuenet, Galinowski, Gallarda, Bellivier, Lefaucheur, Lemaitre, Artiges 2011; 36
George, Post 2011; 168
Maxwell, Kelley, Rausch 2008; 59
Kimbrell, Little, Dunn, Frye, Greenberg, Wassermann, Repella, Danielson, Willis, Benson, Speer, Osuch, George, Post 1999; 46
Egger, Davey Smith, Schneider, Minder 1997; 315
Slotema, Blom, Hoek, Sommer 2010; 71
Fitzgerald, Brown, Marston, Daskalakis, De Castella, Kulkarni 2003; 60
George, Aston-Jones 2010; 35
McDonald, Easley, Byrd, Holtzheimer, Tuohy, Woodard, Beyer, Epstein 2006; 2
O'Reardon, Solvason, Janicak, Sampson, Isenberg, Nahas, McDonald, Avery, Fitzgerald, Loo, Demitrack, George, Sackeim 2007; 62
Schutter 2009; 39
George, Lisanby, Avery, McDonald, Durkalski, Pavlicova, Anderson, Nahas, Bulow, Zarkowski, Holtzheimer, Schwartz, Sackeim 2010; 67
Pallanti, Bernardi, Di Rollo, Antonini, Quercioli 2010; 167
Schutter 2010; 40
Hamilton 1960; 23
Loo, Mitchell, Croker, Malhi, Wen, Gandevia, Sachdev 2003; 33
Bajbouj, Lisanby, Lang, Danker-Hopfe, Heuser, Neu 2006; 59
Fregni, Pascual-Leone 2007; 3
Huf, Kalcher, Pail, Friedrich, Filzmoser, Kasper 2011; 12
Fitzgerald, Brown, Daskalakis 2002; 105
Schonfeldt-Lecuona, Lefaucheur, Cardenas-Morales, Wolf, Kammer, Herwig 2010; 40
Undurraga, Baldessarini 2012; 37
Nierenberg, Fava, Trivedi, Wisniewski, Thase, McGrath, Alpert, Warden, Luther, Niederehe, Lebowitz, Shores-Wilson, Rush 2006; 163
Rossini, Lucca, Magri, Malaguti, Smeraldi, Colombo, Zanardi 2010; 62
Montgomery, Asberg 1979; 134
Lam, Chan, Wilkins-Ho, Yatham 2008; 53
Daskalakis, Levinson, Fitzgerald 2008; 53
Citrome 2011; 72
Fitzgerald, Benitez, de Castella, Daskalakis, Brown, Kulkarni 2006; 163
Riley, Higgins, Deeks 2011; 342
S0033291712002802_ref52
S0033291712002802_ref53
S0033291712002802_ref50
S0033291712002802_ref51
Salustri (S0033291712002802_ref55) 2007; 32
S0033291712002802_ref56
S0033291712002802_ref12
S0033291712002802_ref57
S0033291712002802_ref13
S0033291712002802_ref54
S0033291712002802_ref11
S0033291712002802_ref49
S0033291712002802_ref47
S0033291712002802_ref48
Couturier (S0033291712002802_ref10) 2005; 30
S0033291712002802_ref41
S0033291712002802_ref40
S0033291712002802_ref45
S0033291712002802_ref46
S0033291712002802_ref43
S0033291712002802_ref44
S0033291712002802_ref38
S0033291712002802_ref39
S0033291712002802_ref36
S0033291712002802_ref37
S0033291712002802_ref30
S0033291712002802_ref31
S0033291712002802_ref34
S0033291712002802_ref35
S0033291712002802_ref32
S0033291712002802_ref33
S0033291712002802_ref7
S0033291712002802_ref27
S0033291712002802_ref28
S0033291712002802_ref8
S0033291712002802_ref25
S0033291712002802_ref5
S0033291712002802_ref26
S0033291712002802_ref6
S0033291712002802_ref29
McDonald (S0033291712002802_ref42) 2006; 2
Cooper (S0033291712002802_ref9) 2009
S0033291712002802_ref3
S0033291712002802_ref4
S0033291712002802_ref1
S0033291712002802_ref2
Fitzgerald (S0033291712002802_ref17) 2003; 60
S0033291712002802_ref60
S0033291712002802_ref20
S0033291712002802_ref61
S0033291712002802_ref62
S0033291712002802_ref23
S0033291712002802_ref24
S0033291712002802_ref21
S0033291712002802_ref22
S0033291712002802_ref16
S0033291712002802_ref58
S0033291712002802_ref14
S0033291712002802_ref59
S0033291712002802_ref15
S0033291712002802_ref18
S0033291712002802_ref19
References_xml – volume: 40
  start-page: 1789
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1795
  article-title: Quantitative review of the efficacy of slow-frequency magnetic brain stimulation in major depressive disorder
  publication-title: Psychological Medicine
– volume: 116
  start-page: 165
  year: 2007
  end-page: 173
  article-title: Has repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for depression improved? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the recent vs. the earlier rTMS studies
  publication-title: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
– volume: 56
  start-page: 455
  year: 2000
  end-page: 463
  article-title: Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis
  publication-title: Biometrics
– volume: 105
  start-page: 324
  year: 2002
  end-page: 340
  article-title: The application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatry and neurosciences research
  publication-title: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
– volume: 59
  start-page: 537
  year: 2008
  end-page: 563
  article-title: Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation
  publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology
– volume: 3
  start-page: 383
  year: 2007
  end-page: 393
  article-title: Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology – perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS
  publication-title: Nature Clinical Practice. Neurology
– volume: 35
  start-page: 301
  year: 2010
  end-page: 316
  article-title: Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
  publication-title: Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 163
  start-page: 1905
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1917
  article-title: Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report
  publication-title: American Journal of Psychiatry
– volume: 71
  start-page: 873
  year: 2010
  end-page: 884
  article-title: Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1141
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1146
  article-title: Transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression and other psychiatric disorders
  publication-title: Psychological Medicine
– volume: 32
  start-page: 259
  year: 2007
  end-page: 266
  article-title: Cortical excitability and rest activity properties in patients with depression
  publication-title: Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1002
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1008
  article-title: Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Archives of General Psychiatry
– volume: 8
  start-page: 270
  year: 2002
  end-page: 275
  article-title: Meta-analysis of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat depression
  publication-title: Journal of Psychiatric Practice
– volume: 64
  start-page: 163
  year: 2011
  end-page: 169
  article-title: Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the management of mood disorders
  publication-title: Neuropsychobiology
– volume: 67
  start-page: 507
  year: 2010
  end-page: 516
  article-title: Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial
  publication-title: Archives of General Psychiatry
– volume: 72
  start-page: 412
  year: 2011
  end-page: 413
  article-title: Number needed to treat: what it is and what it isn't, and why every clinician should know how to calculate it
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
– volume: 163
  start-page: 88
  year: 2006
  end-page: 94
  article-title: A randomized, controlled trial of sequential bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
  publication-title: American Journal of Psychiatry
– volume: 148
  start-page: 33
  year: 2006
  end-page: 45
  article-title: An analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of dorsolateral prefrontal cortical activity in depression
  publication-title: Psychiatry Research
– volume: 23
  start-page: 56
  year: 1960
  end-page: 62
  article-title: A rating scale for depression
  publication-title: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
– volume: 134
  start-page: 382
  year: 1979
  end-page: 389
  article-title: A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
  publication-title: British Journal of Psychiatry
– volume: 116
  start-page: 174
  year: 2007
  end-page: 181
  article-title: Neurostimulation therapies in depression: a review of new modalities
  publication-title: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
– volume: 325
  start-page: 652
  year: 2002
  end-page: 654
  article-title: Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis
  publication-title: British Medical Journal
– volume: 2
  start-page: 85
  year: 2006
  end-page: 94
  article-title: Combination rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment refractory depression
  publication-title: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
– volume: 40
  start-page: 37
  year: 2010
  end-page: 43
  article-title: The value of neuronavigated rTMS for the treatment of depression
  publication-title: Neurophysiologie Clinique
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1603
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1613
  article-title: Frequency dependence of antidepressant response to left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a function of baseline cerebral glucose metabolism
  publication-title: Biological Psychiatry
– volume: 146
  start-page: 53
  year: 2006
  end-page: 57
  article-title: High (20-Hz) and low (1-Hz) frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation as adjuvant treatment in medication-resistant depression
  publication-title: Psychiatry Research
– volume: 5
  start-page: 569
  year: 2012
  end-page: 576
  article-title: Neurophysiological predictors of non-response to rTMS in depression
  publication-title: Brain Stimulation
– volume: 342
  start-page: d549
  year: 2011
  article-title: Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses
  publication-title: British Medical Journal
– volume: 30
  start-page: 83
  year: 2005
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Efficacy of rapid-rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
– volume: 182
  start-page: 480
  year: 2003
  end-page: 491
  article-title: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression. Systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: British Journal of Psychiatry
– volume: 62
  start-page: 91
  year: 2010
  end-page: 97
  article-title: A symptom-specific analysis of the effect of high-frequency left or low-frequency right transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression
  publication-title: Neuropsychobiology
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1870
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1876
  article-title: Factors modifying the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a review
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
– volume: 26
  start-page: 229
  year: 2009
  end-page: 234
  article-title: A randomized trial of the anti-depressant effects of low- and high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression
  publication-title: Depression and Anxiety
– volume: 120
  start-page: 2008
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2039
  article-title: Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research
  publication-title: Clinical Neurophysiology
– volume: 53
  start-page: 555
  year: 2008
  end-page: 566
  article-title: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depressive disorder: a review [article in French]
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
– volume: 39
  start-page: 65
  year: 2009
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Antidepressant efficacy of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in double-blind sham-controlled designs: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Psychological Medicine
– volume: 139
  start-page: 193
  year: 2012
  end-page: 198
  article-title: A double blind randomized trial of unilateral left and bilateral prefrontal cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment resistant major depression
  publication-title: Journal of Affective Disorders
– volume: 17
  start-page: 696
  year: 2007
  end-page: 707
  article-title: What is the meaning of treatment resistant/refractory major depression (TRD)? A systematic review of current randomized trials
  publication-title: European Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 36
  start-page: 2710
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2719
  article-title: Baseline brain metabolism in resistant depression and response to transcranial magnetic stimulation
  publication-title: Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 163
  start-page: 1519
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1530
  article-title: A comparison of lithium and T(3) augmentation following two failed medication treatments for depression: a STAR*D report
  publication-title: American Journal of Psychiatry
– volume: 53
  start-page: 621
  year: 2008
  end-page: 631
  article-title: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and metaanalysis
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
– volume: 29
  start-page: 683
  year: 2008
  end-page: 695
  article-title: A meta-analytic study of changes in brain activation in depression
  publication-title: Human Brain Mapping
– volume: 5
  start-page: 73
  year: 2002
  end-page: 103
  article-title: Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis
  publication-title: International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1772
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1777
  article-title: Functional brain asymmetry as a determinative factor in the treatment of depression: theoretical implications
  publication-title: Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
– volume: 59
  start-page: 395
  year: 2006
  end-page: 400
  article-title: Evidence for impaired cortical inhibition in patients with unipolar major depression
  publication-title: Biological Psychiatry
– volume: 37
  start-page: 102
  year: 2012
  end-page: 116
  article-title: Somatic treatments for mood disorders
  publication-title: Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 37
  start-page: 851
  year: 2012
  end-page: 864
  article-title: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review
  publication-title: Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 65
  start-page: 175
  year: 2011
  end-page: 182
  article-title: Neuroanatomical correlates of therapeutic efficacy of low-frequency right prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression
  publication-title: Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
– volume: 13
  start-page: 423
  year: 2012
  end-page: 435
  article-title: A randomized double-blind sham-controlled comparison of unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression
  publication-title: World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
– volume: 133
  start-page: 98
  year: 2012
  end-page: 107
  article-title: Transcranial magnetic brain stimulation: therapeutic promises and scientific gaps
  publication-title: Pharmacology and Therapeutics
– volume: 167
  start-page: 323
  year: 2010
  end-page: 328
  article-title: Unilateral low frequency versus sequential bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: is simpler better for treatment of resistant depression?
  publication-title: Neuroscience
– volume: 115
  start-page: 386
  year: 2009
  end-page: 394
  article-title: Opposite effects of high and low frequency rTMS on mood in depressed patients: relationship to baseline cerebral activity on PET
  publication-title: Journal of Affective Disorders
– volume: 33
  start-page: 33
  year: 2003
  end-page: 40
  article-title: Double-blind controlled investigation of bilateral prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of resistant major depression
  publication-title: Psychological Medicine
– volume: 168
  start-page: 356
  year: 2011
  end-page: 364
  article-title: Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of medication-resistant depression
  publication-title: American Journal of Psychiatry
– volume: 12
  start-page: 188
  year: 2011
  end-page: 200
  article-title: Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses
  publication-title: World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
– volume: 315
  start-page: 629
  year: 1997
  end-page: 634
  article-title: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
  publication-title: British Medical Journal
– volume: 62
  start-page: 1208
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1216
  article-title: Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Biological Psychiatry
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref28
  doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref50
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref1
  doi: 10.1159/000328951
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1002
  year: 2003
  ident: S0033291712002802_ref17
  article-title: Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Archives of General Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.1002
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref36
  doi: 10.1017/S0033291702006839
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref12
  doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref60
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.006
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref21
  doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.04.006
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref46
  doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref34
  doi: 10.1097/00131746-200209000-00003
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref7
  doi: 10.1017/S1461145702002791
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref56
  doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2009.06.004
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref22
  doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0530
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref6
  doi: 10.1002/9780470743386
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref58
  doi: 10.1017/S003329171000005X
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref26
  doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060864
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref41
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093735
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref30
  doi: 10.1002/9780470712184
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref15
  doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.88
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref31
  doi: 10.3109/15622975.2010.551544
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref54
  doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref8
  doi: 10.4088/JCP.11ac06874
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref4
  doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.03.009
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref18
  doi: 10.1002/da.20454
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref40
  doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.161
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref38
  doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003493
– volume-title: The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
  year: 2009
  ident: S0033291712002802_ref9
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref37
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01033.x
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref13
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref49
  doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.225
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref20
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.20426
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref29
  doi: 10.4088/JCP.v67n1206
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref2
  doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.003
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref39
  doi: 10.1192/bjp.182.6.480
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref53
  doi: 10.1002/0470870168
– volume: 32
  start-page: 259
  year: 2007
  ident: S0033291712002802_ref55
  article-title: Cortical excitability and rest activity properties in patients with depression
  publication-title: Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref59
  doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04872gre
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref43
  doi: 10.1017/S0033291701004378
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref14
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref44
  doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref3
  doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.036
– volume: 2
  start-page: 85
  year: 2006
  ident: S0033291712002802_ref42
  article-title: Combination rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment refractory depression
  publication-title: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref48
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549
– volume: 30
  start-page: 83
  year: 2005
  ident: S0033291712002802_ref10
  article-title: Efficacy of rapid-rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref45
  doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.9.1519
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref24
  doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.87
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref61
  doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.306
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref62
  doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.09.003
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref57
  doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003462
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref51
  doi: 10.1159/000315439
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref35
  doi: 10.1177/070674370805300909
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref16
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1r179.x
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref25
  doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref11
  doi: 10.1177/070674370805300902
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref27
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01049.x
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref19
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.017
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref32
  doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00195-X
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref52
  doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.08.011
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref33
  doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02183.x
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref5
  doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.579163
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref47
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.063
– ident: S0033291712002802_ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2004.08.005
SSID ssj0013142
Score 2.4890168
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials to date have...
Background Bilateral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising novel therapeutic intervention for major depression (MD). However, clinical trials...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
cambridge
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 2245
SubjectTerms Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Antidepressant drugs
Biological and medical sciences
Depression
Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy
Efficacy
Heterogeneity
Humans
Medical sciences
Mental depression
Meta-analysis
Miscellaneous
Mood disorders
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Statistical power
Stimulation
Systematic review
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods
Treatment Outcome
Title A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and acceptability of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating major depression
URI https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0033291712002802/type/journal_article
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23200131
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1440031213
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1443399265
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1492582293
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1492615126
Volume 43
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fa9swEBZbC2Mwxn7PWxs02MM2ZmZLlmU9jba0lEHK2FrIW5BkaTAaO23ch_5D_Tt3JytOy6hfgmOfhPCdpE--u-8I-WiMd14rDRoofVpIrtLKeJlKLThzFc-tx9zh6Ul5fFb8mIlZ_OC2imGV6zUxLNR1a_Eb-Td0QoIBspx_X16kWDUKvauxhMZDso3UZRjSJWdy40XIi54tPNQry-Xaqxkoo-Em3stZ8C6y29wKd_aoJ0u9gtfl-zoX9wPRsCEdPSNPI5Kke73qn5MHrnlBHk2jr_wludmjG5pm2qeoUN3UdOE6nepIRkLbhgIGpA6pJLS9DhLaYrBLz-B9TVtP4UpjqvI59LPEvDRYI2mH25yFHzBhutB_GsyHpLBkLGJJMPrp8nT6-zMFXExDQDtskyD4F_4OAbjNK3J2dHh6cJzGqgypFVx0qeKOl1Wdc4OAy2vtMziTVNJJU0lbs9pmBs5JBmB7Waja18LqvM4yeFoLXXD-mmw1bePeEgri3uUSTphwKISGKi-EM95wZbzOlE3I10En8zi3VvM-Lk3O_1NhQrK12uY2MpxjoY3zsSZfhibLnt5jTHhyxxaGFkwqwNVMJWRnbRy3hjsYbkI-DI9hEqNnRjeuvQoyHBmCSzEmo5hAev7RfqAPxHBlQt70xrkZJGdhSrwbH-R78phhxY-QbrlDtrrLK7cLuKszkzC5JmR7__Dk569_pZMqeA
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9RAFB7KFlQQ8W601hEUVAwmM0km8yBStWVru4voFvoWZyYzgnSTtZsi-4d89Dd6Tm7bIuatLyGXM8PAucw3OTdCnmntrFNSAQcS50eCSz_VTvhCxZzZlIfGYe7wZJqMj6JPx_HxBvnT5cJgWGVnE2tDnZcG_5G_QSckCCAL-bvFTx-7RqF3tWuh0YjFgV39giPb8u3-R-Dvc8b2dmcfxn7bVcA3MY8rX3LLkzQPuUbA4JRyAWDqVFihU2FylptAA87XADuTSOYuj40K8yCAr3msIvwBCiZ_M-JwlBmRzfe7089f1n6LMGrqk9cd0kLR-VHrItXwEt-FrPZnsvPVHC7sitcXagkMck1njf9D33oL3LtJbrTYle40wnaLbNjiNrkyab3zd8jvHbouDE2bpBiqipzObaV81ZY_oWVBAXVSi8UrlFnVFMpgeE1TM3xFS0fhTmFy9AnMs8BMOLDKtMKN1cAFlIbO1fcCMzApGKl524SMvjidTb6-pIDEaR1CDxszEP6Axz7kt7hLji6FY_fIqCgL-4BQIHc2FHCmhWMoDJRhFFvtNJfaqUAaj7zueZK12rzMmkg4kf3DQo8EHdsy09ZUx9YeJ0NDXvVDFk1BkSHi7Quy0I9gQgKSZ9IjW51wnFturyoeedp_BrOBviBV2PKspuFYkziJh2gki7EhwOA8MAeixsQj9xvhXC-Ss1olHg4v8gm5Op5NDrPD_enBI3KNYb-ROtlzi4yq0zP7GFBfpbdbVaPk22Vr918HmGc7
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1baxQxFA6lQhFEvDu11ggKKg6dJDOTmQeRYl1a6xbBFvZtm2QSQboz2-4U2T_kj_DXeU7msi3ivPVlmMtJCJxLvsy5EfJKa2edyhVwIHVhLEUeZtrJUKpEcJsJZhzmDo-P0v2T-MskmayRP10uDIZVdjbRG-qiMviPfAedkCCAnIkd14ZFfNsbfZyfh9hBCj2tXTuNRkQO7fIXHN8WHw72gNevOR99Pv60H7YdBkKTiKQOc2FFmhVMaAQPTikXAb7OpJU6k6bghYk0YH4NEDSN88IViVGsiCL4WiQqxp-hYP5vSZEw1DE5kSsPBoubSuW-VxqTnUfVl6uGl_iOce_Z5FfrOlzbH-_M1QJY5ZoeG_8HwX4zHN0jd1sUS3cbsbtP1mz5gGyMWz_9Q_J7l65KRNMmPYaqsqAzW6tQtYVQaFVSwJ_UYhkLZZaeQhkMtGmqhy9p5SjcKUyTPoN55pgTB_aZ1rjFGriA-tCZ-lFiLiYFczVr25HRNxfH4-9vKWBy6oPpYYsGwp_w2Af_lo_IyY3w6zFZL6vSPiUUyJ1lEk63cCCFgTmLE6udFrl2KspNQN73PJm2er2YNjFxcvoPCwMSdWybmra6Ojb5OBsa8q4fMm9KiwwRb1-ThX4Elzlgep4HZKsTjivL7ZUmIC_7z2BA0CukSltdehqB1YnTZIgm5wm2BhicB-ZA_JgG5EkjnKtFCu5VYnN4kS_IBuj09OvB0eEzcptj4xGf9blF1uuLS_sc4F-tt72eUXJ604r9F95Uags
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis+on+the+efficacy+and+acceptability+of+bilateral+repetitive+transcranial+magnetic+stimulation+%28rTMS%29+for+treating+major+depression&rft.jtitle=Psychological+medicine&rft.au=Berlim%2C+M+T&rft.au=Van+den+Eynde%2C+F&rft.au=Daskalakis%2C+Z+J&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2245&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS0033291712002802&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23200131&rft.externalDocID=23200131
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0033-2917&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0033-2917&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0033-2917&client=summon