Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic nasal bone

• Published in: Annals of medicine (Helsinki) Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 1297 - 1302
• Main Authors: Shi, Xiaomei, Lu, Jian, Li, Ling, Wei, Ran, Wu, Jing
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 31.12.2022; Taylor & Francis Group
• Subjects: Absent nasal bone; Chromosome Aberrations; chromosome microarray analysis; DNA Copy Number Variations; Female; Fetus; Humans; hypoplastic nasal bone; Microarray Analysis - methods; Nasal Bone - diagnostic imaging; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Childbirth & Women's Health; prenatal diagnosis; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods; Absent nasal bone; chromosome microarray analysis; hypoplastic nasal bone; prenatal diagnosis
• ISSN: 0785-3890; 1365-2060; 1365-2060
• DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2070271

To evaluate the efficiency of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in the prenatal diagnosis of foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (NB) in the first and second trimester. From January 2015 to April 2021, foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic NB who received invasive prenatal diagnosis were enrolled. The results of CMA were analysed There were 221 foetuses, including 166 cases with isolated absent NB and 55 cases with isolated hypoplastic NB. Twenty-four foetuses (10.9%, 24/221) had an ultrasonic diagnosis in the first trimester and 197 (89.1%, 197/221) had a ultrasonic diagnosis in the second trimester. The overall diagnostic yield of CMA was 9.0% (20/221). Aneuploidies were detected in 13 (5.9%, 13/221) foetuses, including 10 Down syndrome, 2 Klinefelter's syndrome and 1 trisomy 18. Pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in seven foetuses (3.2%, 7/221). In addition, variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected in four foetuses. The foetuses with isolated absent NB had a higher detection rate of chromosome abnormality than the isolated hypoplastic NB, but the difference was not significant in the statistical analysis (10.2% vs. 5.5%, χ 2  =0.642, p = .423). No significant difference was observed in the detection rate between the first trimester and the second trimester (16.6% vs. 8.1%, χ 2  = 1.002, p = .317, Chi-square test). CMA can increase the diagnostic yield of chromosome abnormality, especially pathogenic CNVs for foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic NB. CMA should be recommended when isolated absent or hypoplastic NB is suspected antenatally.7