Pain evaluation in dairy cattle

•Cows show specific pain behaviours.•The pain behaviours are altered by analgesia.•The pain behaviours can be summarized in a pain scale. Pain compromises the welfare of animals. A prerequisite for being able to alleviate pain is that we are able to recognize it. Potential behavioural signs of pain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied animal behaviour science Vol. 171; pp. 25 - 32
Main Authors Gleerup, Karina Bech, Andersen, Pia Haubro, Munksgaard, Lene, Forkman, Björn
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.10.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract •Cows show specific pain behaviours.•The pain behaviours are altered by analgesia.•The pain behaviours can be summarized in a pain scale. Pain compromises the welfare of animals. A prerequisite for being able to alleviate pain is that we are able to recognize it. Potential behavioural signs of pain were investigated for dairy cattle with the aim of constructing a pain scale for use under production conditions. Forty-three cows were selected and fifteen different behaviours were scored, subsequently a clinical examination was performed to allocate the cows to a pain and non-pain group. The animals were then treated with an analgesic or a placebo and after a resting period the cows were re-scored by two observers blinded to the treatment. Six behaviours were found to be significantly different between the pain and non-pain group and robust enough to be included in the pain scale: ‘attention towards the surroundings’ ‘head position’, ‘ears position’, ‘facial expressions’, ‘response to approach’ and ‘back position’ (a seventh, piloerection, was also significant but seemed difficult to use as it changed rapidly; p<0.05 for all measures). The Cow Pain Scale is the sum of the score for the aforementioned behaviours. For each individual animal before and after treatment, it was significantly lower after analgesic treatment (p=0.003) in the ClinPain group but not after placebo treatment (p=0.06); the pain score did not differ significantly before compared to after treatment with analgesic or placebo for the non-pain group (p=0.2; p=0.1). A second study was conducted to further validate the Cow Pain Scale. Cows from two herds were randomly selected (n=119) and their behaviour scored by two observers. Subsequently the cows were clinically examined and allocated to a pain and non-pain group (n=96, 23 cows were excluded because of incomplete examination). The cows from the pain group scored higher on The Cow Pain Scale compared to the non-pain group for both observer I (p<0.0001) and observer II (p=0.0001). For the two observers the sensitivity of the Cow Pain Scale was calculated to 0.61/0.75 and the specificity to 0.75/0.75 with a weighted Kappa of 0.62. In conclusion the Cow Pain Scale has the potential to be applied for the assessment of pain in dairy cattle under production conditions.
AbstractList Pain compromises the welfare of animals. A prerequisite for being able to alleviate pain is that we are able to recognize it. Potential behavioural signs of pain were investigated for dairy cattle with the aim of constructing a pain scale for use under production conditions. Forty-three cows were selected and fifteen different behaviours were scored, subsequently a clinical examination was performed to allocate the cows to a pain and non-pain group. The animals were then treated with an analgesic or a placebo and after a resting period the cows were re-scored by two observers blinded to the treatment. Six behaviours were found to be significantly different between the pain and non-pain group and robust enough to be included in the pain scale: 'attention towards the surroundings' 'head position', 'ears position', 'facial expressions', 'response to approach' and 'back position' (a seventh, piloerection, was also significant but seemed difficult to use as it changed rapidly; p <0.05 for all measures). The Cow Pain Scale is the sum of the score for the aforementioned behaviours. For each individual animal before and after treatment, it was significantly lower after analgesic treatment (p =0.003) in the ClinPain group but not after placebo treatment (p =0.06); the pain score did not differ significantly before compared to after treatment with analgesic or placebo for the non-pain group (p =0.2; p =0.1). A second study was conducted to further validate the Cow Pain Scale. Cows from two herds were randomly selected (n =119) and their behaviour scored by two observers. Subsequently the cows were clinically examined and allocated to a pain and non-pain group (n =96, 23 cows were excluded because of incomplete examination). The cows from the pain group scored higher on The Cow Pain Scale compared to the non-pain group for both observer I (p <0.0001) and observer II (p =0.0001). For the two observers the sensitivity of the Cow Pain Scale was calculated to 0.61/0.75 and the specificity to 0.75/0.75 with a weighted Kappa of 0.62. In conclusion the Cow Pain Scale has the potential to be applied for the assessment of pain in dairy cattle under production conditions.
•Cows show specific pain behaviours.•The pain behaviours are altered by analgesia.•The pain behaviours can be summarized in a pain scale. Pain compromises the welfare of animals. A prerequisite for being able to alleviate pain is that we are able to recognize it. Potential behavioural signs of pain were investigated for dairy cattle with the aim of constructing a pain scale for use under production conditions. Forty-three cows were selected and fifteen different behaviours were scored, subsequently a clinical examination was performed to allocate the cows to a pain and non-pain group. The animals were then treated with an analgesic or a placebo and after a resting period the cows were re-scored by two observers blinded to the treatment. Six behaviours were found to be significantly different between the pain and non-pain group and robust enough to be included in the pain scale: ‘attention towards the surroundings’ ‘head position’, ‘ears position’, ‘facial expressions’, ‘response to approach’ and ‘back position’ (a seventh, piloerection, was also significant but seemed difficult to use as it changed rapidly; p<0.05 for all measures). The Cow Pain Scale is the sum of the score for the aforementioned behaviours. For each individual animal before and after treatment, it was significantly lower after analgesic treatment (p=0.003) in the ClinPain group but not after placebo treatment (p=0.06); the pain score did not differ significantly before compared to after treatment with analgesic or placebo for the non-pain group (p=0.2; p=0.1). A second study was conducted to further validate the Cow Pain Scale. Cows from two herds were randomly selected (n=119) and their behaviour scored by two observers. Subsequently the cows were clinically examined and allocated to a pain and non-pain group (n=96, 23 cows were excluded because of incomplete examination). The cows from the pain group scored higher on The Cow Pain Scale compared to the non-pain group for both observer I (p<0.0001) and observer II (p=0.0001). For the two observers the sensitivity of the Cow Pain Scale was calculated to 0.61/0.75 and the specificity to 0.75/0.75 with a weighted Kappa of 0.62. In conclusion the Cow Pain Scale has the potential to be applied for the assessment of pain in dairy cattle under production conditions.
Pain compromises the welfare of animals. A prerequisite for being able to alleviate pain is that we are able to recognize it. Potential behavioural signs of pain were investigated for dairy cattle with the aim of constructing a pain scale for use under production conditions. Forty-three cows were selected and fifteen different behaviours were scored, subsequently a clinical examination was performed to allocate the cows to a pain and non-pain group. The animals were then treated with an analgesic or a placebo and after a resting period the cows were re-scored by two observers blinded to the treatment. Six behaviours were found to be significantly different between the pain and non-pain group and robust enough to be included in the pain scale: 'attention towards the surroundings' head position', 'ears position', 'facial expressions', 'response to approach' and 'back position' (a seventh, piloerection, was also significant but seemed difficult to use as it changed rapidly; p &lt; 0.05 for all measures). The Cow Pain Scale is the sum of the score for the aforementioned behaviours. For each individual animal before and after treatment, it was significantly lower after analgesic treatment (p = 0.003) in the ClinPain group but not after placebo treatment (p = 0.06); the pain score did not differ significantly before compared to after treatment with analgesic or placebo for the non-pain group (p = 0.2; p = 0.1). A second study was conducted to further validate the Cow Pain Scale. Cows from two herds were randomly selected (n = 119) and their behaviour scored by two observers. Subsequently the cows were clinically examined and allocated to a pain and non-pain group (n = 96, 23 cows were excluded because of incomplete examination). The cows from the pain group scored higher on The Cow Pain Scale compared to the non-pain group for both observer I (p &lt; 0.0001) and observer II (p = 0.0001). For the two observers the sensitivity of the Cow Pain Scale was calculated to 0.61/0.75 and the specificity to 0.75/0.75 with a weighted Kappa of 0.62. In conclusion the Cow Pain Scale has the potential to be applied for the assessment of pain in dairy cattle under production conditions. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Author Forkman, Björn
Munksgaard, Lene
Gleerup, Karina Bech
Andersen, Pia Haubro
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Karina Bech
  surname: Gleerup
  fullname: Gleerup, Karina Bech
  email: kbg@sund.ku.dk
  organization: University of Copenhagen, Department of Large Animal Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Pia Haubro
  surname: Andersen
  fullname: Andersen, Pia Haubro
  email: pia.haubro.andersen@slu.se
  organization: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Clinical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lene
  surname: Munksgaard
  fullname: Munksgaard, Lene
  email: lene.munksgaard@anis.au.dk
  organization: Aarhus University, Department of Animal Science, Aarhus, Denmark
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Björn
  surname: Forkman
  fullname: Forkman, Björn
  email: bjf@sund.ku.dk
  organization: University of Copenhagen, Department of Large Animal Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
BackLink https://res.slu.se/id/publ/75386$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNqFkE1LxDAQQIMouH78Bd2jl9ZMkzQpeFDEL1jQg55DmkwhS7etSbvivzfruhcvexoG3huYd0IOu75DQi6A5kChvF7mZhha0_lVXlAQOVU5LdgBmYGSRVZRLg7JLIEqA1HBMTmJcUkpFQzojFy-Gd_NcW3ayYy-7-Zpc8aH77k149jiGTlqTBvx_G-eko_Hh_f752zx-vRyf7fIrGB8zMoSGiFs4wRXSpXGSScU50VjpKOmLigyAMnR1VUFDQOWNFvTBEhppXXslGTbu_ELh6nWQ_ArE751b7yO7VSbsBk6opaCqTLxV1t-CP3nhHHUKx8ttqkD9lPUoHjJQACo_ajkpaoEB5bQmy1qQx9jwEZbP_52GYPxrQaqN8n1Uu-S601yTZVOyZNe_tN3b-wVb7cipsRrj-lZ67Gz6HxAO2rX-30nfgCx6KCQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compag_2020_105453
crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skab373
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2024_25692
crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skab378
crossref_primary_10_1039_D1MO00354B
crossref_primary_10_5187_jast_2022_e74
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11010209
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13030364
crossref_primary_10_1002_vrc2_314
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpain_2025_1547764
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12917_022_03304_6
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2021_676888
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_13348_1
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10091648
crossref_primary_10_3389_fanim_2021_753080
crossref_primary_10_3390_dairy3040056
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2018_14930
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12020176
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_31297_1
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_9395
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11102820
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14162444
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12151944
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cvex_2022_07_011
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14020351
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0187986
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0251435
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2019_16334
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tvjl_2024_106079
crossref_primary_10_1017_awf_2024_48
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tvjl_2018_10_001
crossref_primary_10_1002_vrc2_818
crossref_primary_10_1002_vrc2_70011
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0280830
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14020181
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1466252321000141
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_887042
crossref_primary_10_1136_vr_105920
crossref_primary_10_1017_awf_2024_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jveb_2021_10_005
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_46330_5
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2018_00299
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2019_16325
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2023_105874
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0218546
crossref_primary_10_12935_jvma_74_197
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2024_103875
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_65890_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vaa_2024_09_005
crossref_primary_10_2460_javma_258_2_197
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0228059
crossref_primary_10_1638_2022_0118
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2017_12796
crossref_primary_10_1002_vetr_515
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2025_1541615
crossref_primary_10_15212_ijafr_2020_0151
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11051235
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2024_25255
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_77147_6
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0231608
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3990637
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10101726
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2019_17123
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11071917
crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_8478cr20210302
crossref_primary_10_1111_asj_13845
crossref_primary_10_1079_abwcases_2024_0008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2021_105260
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2025_1546719
crossref_primary_10_1002_vetr_300
crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2021_0190
crossref_primary_10_31893_jabb_20001
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11071882
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12223143
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2021_105258
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_27884_x
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2020_20047
crossref_primary_10_1111_avj_13104
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12212940
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_beproc_2018_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physbeh_2016_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000000978
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2016_03_007
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0211852
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000002474
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2025_106583
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0195674
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2020_606848
crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2020_6275
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_livsci_2022_105083
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0310537
crossref_primary_10_1093_emph_eoad038
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_animal_2021_100338
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2022_22533
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12917_023_03638_9
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2020_00442
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jveb_2019_07_007
crossref_primary_10_1079_abwcases_2024_0020
crossref_primary_10_1111_vsu_14182
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10030426
crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2019_0276
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani12182400
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0272169
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14192898
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2023_105951
crossref_primary_10_1017_awf_2023_46
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2020_18523
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11041120
crossref_primary_10_1386_tear_00080_1
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture8080127
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11061483
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0228130
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2023_105880
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpain_2024_1396992
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2022_1002681
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14050676
crossref_primary_10_2527_tas2017_0044
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2071_0401
Cites_doi 10.1093/bja/aen087
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72578-4
10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00205-8
10.1136/inpract.30.3.126
10.1136/vr.116.16.431
10.2527/1997.751266x
10.1136/vr.148.17.525
10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00521.x
10.1111/vaa.12212
10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00139.x
10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.04.002
10.2307/2529310
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.002
10.1080/00480169.2009.36904
10.1017/S0962728600026257
10.1186/s12917-014-0200-0
10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.008
10.1017/S0962728600031146
10.1136/vr.c3851
10.1016/j.cveq.2010.04.002
10.2460/javma.238.6.755
10.2527/2002.80168x
10.1371/journal.pone.0092281
10.1016/S0749-0739(02)00009-3
10.1136/vr.165.9.254
10.1136/vr.159.20.662
10.1136/vr.118.12.334
10.3168/jds.2009-2803
10.1038/nmeth.1455
10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.013
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 The Authors
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 The Authors
CorporateAuthor Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
7QG
7S9
L.6
ADTPV
AOWAS
DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Animal Behavior Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
SwePub
SwePub Articles
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Animal Behavior Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Animal Behavior Abstracts


AGRICOLA
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Veterinary Medicine
Zoology
Psychology
EISSN 1872-9045
EndPage 32
ExternalDocumentID oai_slubar_slu_se_75386
10_1016_j_applanim_2015_08_023
S0168159115002269
GroupedDBID --K
--M
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
23M
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
6I.
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AABVA
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALCJ
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATLK
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABGRD
ABIVO
ABKYH
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABRWV
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADQTV
AEBSH
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AEXOQ
AFKWA
AFRAH
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AI.
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
CBWCG
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HLV
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LCYCR
LW9
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
QYZTP
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAB
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSA
SSZ
SVS
T5K
VH1
WUQ
~G-
~KM
AAHBH
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABJNI
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
BNPGV
CITATION
SSH
7QG
7S9
L.6
ADTPV
AOWAS
EFKBS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-661f55cfd548886ad7d58442fa7d0ab20e31174edb991f313c53cb042f77c7cd3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0168-1591
1872-9045
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 06:41:00 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 07:40:56 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:20:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:24:42 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:04 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:21:59 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Pain scale
Pain behaviour
Pain evaluation
Pain face
Dairy cattle
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c534t-661f55cfd548886ad7d58442fa7d0ab20e31174edb991f313c53cb042f77c7cd3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159115002269
PQID 1746895413
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_75386
proquest_miscellaneous_1846315118
proquest_miscellaneous_1746895413
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_applanim_2015_08_023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2015_08_023
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_applanim_2015_08_023
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Applied animal behaviour science
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
References Leslie, Petersson-Wolfe (bib0105) 2012; 28
Morton, Griffiths (bib0120) 1985; 116
Hemsworth, Coleman, Barnett (bib0050) 2002; 80
Leach, Klaus, Miller (bib0100) 2012
Driessen, Bauquier, Zarucco (bib0020) 2010; 26
Huxley, Whay (bib0070) 2006; 159
Holton, Reid, Scott (bib0060) 2001; 148
Sandem, Janczak, Salte (bib0155) 2006; 96
Kielland, Skjerve, Zanella (bib0080) 2009; 165
Flecknell (bib0035) 2008; 101
Gleerup, Forkman, Lindegaard (bib0040) 2015; 42
Weary, Niel, Flower (bib0185) 2006; 100
Hewson, Dohoo, Lemke (bib0055) 2007; 48
Dalla Costa, Minero, Lebelt (bib0010) 2014; 9
Otten, Toft, Houe (bib0135) 2013; 112
Radostits, Gay, Hinchcliff (bib0150) 2007; 10
Sanford, Ewbank, Molony (bib0160) 1986; 118
Chapinal, de Passille, Rushen (bib0005) 2010; 93
Landis, Koch (bib0085) 1977; 33
Millman (bib0115) 2007; 16
Hansen (bib0045) 1997
Molony, Kent (bib0125) 1997; 75
Fajt, Wagner, Norby (bib0030) 2011; 238
Taylor, Pascoe, Mama (bib0175) 2002; 18
Price, Catriona, Welsh (bib0140) 2003; 30
Short (bib0165) 1999; 4
Eicher, Cheng, Sorrells (bib0025) 2006; 89
de Oliveira, Luna, do Amaral (bib0015) 2014; 10
Lindegaard, Thomsen, Larsen (bib0110) 2010; 37
Keating, Thomas, Flecknell (bib0075) 2012
Pritchett, Ulibarri, Roberts (bib0145) 2003; 80
Sotocinal, Sorge, Zaloum (bib0170) 2011; 7
Thomsen, Gidekull, Herskin (bib0180) 2010; 167
Laven, Huxley, Whay (bib0095) 2009; 57
O’Callaghan, Cripps, Downham (bib0130) 2003; 12
Langford, Bailey, Chanda (bib0090) 2010; 7
Hudson, Whay, Huxley (bib0065) 2008; 30
Gleerup, Lindegaard (bib0041) 2015
de Oliveira (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0015) 2014; 10
Morton (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0120) 1985; 116
Flecknell (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0035) 2008; 101
Dalla Costa (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0010) 2014; 9
Price (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0140) 2003; 30
Holton (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0060) 2001; 148
Gleerup (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0040) 2015; 42
Lindegaard (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0110) 2010; 37
Gleerup (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0041) 2015
Langford (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0090) 2010; 7
Laven (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0095) 2009; 57
O’Callaghan (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0130) 2003; 12
Short (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0165) 1999; 4
Sanford (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0160) 1986; 118
Kielland (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0080) 2009; 165
Millman (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0115) 2007; 16
Sandem (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0155) 2006; 96
Molony (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0125) 1997; 75
Hemsworth (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0050) 2002; 80
Landis (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0085) 1977; 33
Huxley (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0070) 2006; 159
Chapinal (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0005) 2010; 93
Otten (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0135) 2013; 112
Fajt (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0030) 2011; 238
Sotocinal (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0170) 2011; 7
Keating (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0075) 2012
Leslie (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0105) 2012; 28
Taylor (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0175) 2002; 18
Weary (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0185) 2006; 100
Driessen (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0020) 2010; 26
Hansen (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0045) 1997
Thomsen (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0180) 2010; 167
Radostits (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0150) 2007; 10
Eicher (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0025) 2006; 89
Hewson (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0055) 2007; 48
Hudson (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0065) 2008; 30
Leach (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0100) 2012
Pritchett (10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0145) 2003; 80
References_xml – start-page: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: bib0075
  article-title: Evaluation of EMLA cream for preventing pain during tattooing of rabbits: changes in physiological, behavioural and facial expression responses
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 37
  start-page: 171
  year: 2010
  end-page: 185
  ident: bib0110
  article-title: Analgesic efficacy of intra-articular morphine in experimentally induced radiocarpal synovitis in horses
  publication-title: Vet. Anaesth. Analg.
– volume: 75
  start-page: 266
  year: 1997
  end-page: 272
  ident: bib0125
  article-title: Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements
  publication-title: J. Anim. Sci.
– year: 2015
  ident: bib0041
  article-title: Recognition and quantification of pain in horses: a tutorial review
  publication-title: Equine Vet. Educ.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 159
  year: 1977
  end-page: 174
  ident: bib0085
  article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
  publication-title: Biometrics
– volume: 101
  start-page: 121
  year: 2008
  end-page: 124
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Analgesia from a veterinary perspective
  publication-title: Br. J. Anaesth.
– volume: 96
  start-page: 177
  year: 2006
  end-page: 183
  ident: bib0155
  article-title: The use of diazepam as a pharmacological validation of eye white as an indicator of emotional state in dairy cows
  publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 200
  year: 2014
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu unidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle
  publication-title: BMC Vet. Res.
– volume: 118
  start-page: 334
  year: 1986
  end-page: 338
  ident: bib0160
  article-title: Guidelines for the recognition and assessment of pain in animals
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
– volume: 26
  start-page: 315
  year: 2010
  end-page: 337
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Neuropathic pain management in chronic laminitis
  publication-title: Vet. Clin. North Am.—Equine Pract.
– volume: 7
  start-page: 55
  year: 2011
  ident: bib0170
  article-title: The Rat Grimace Scale: a partially automated method for quantifying pain in the laboratory rat via facial expressions
  publication-title: Mol. Pain
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1932
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1944
  ident: bib0165
  article-title: Pain in animals
  publication-title: Textb. Pain
– volume: 16
  start-page: 123
  year: 2007
  end-page: 125
  ident: bib0115
  article-title: Sickness behaviour and its relevance to animal welfare assessment at the group level
  publication-title: Anim. Welf.
– volume: 167
  start-page: 256
  year: 2010
  end-page: 258
  ident: bib0180
  article-title: Scandinavian bovine practitioners’ attitudes to the use of analgesics in cattle
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
– volume: 116
  start-page: 431
  year: 1985
  end-page: 436
  ident: bib0120
  article-title: Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
– volume: 28
  start-page: 289
  year: 2012
  end-page: 305
  ident: bib0105
  article-title: Assessment and management of pain in dairy cows with clinical mastitis
  publication-title: Vet. Clin. North Am.—Food Anim. Pract.
– volume: 80
  start-page: 31
  year: 2003
  end-page: 43
  ident: bib0145
  article-title: Identification of potential physiological and behavioral indicators of postoperative pain in horses after exploratory celiotomy for colic
  publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
– volume: 93
  start-page: 2007
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2013
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Automated methods for detecting lameness and measuring analgesia in dairy cattle
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 126-+
  year: 2008
  ident: bib0065
  article-title: Recognition and management of pain in cattle
  publication-title: Practice
– volume: 159
  start-page: 662-+
  year: 2006
  ident: bib0070
  article-title: Current attitudes of cattle practitioners to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
– volume: 7
  start-page: 447
  year: 2010
  end-page: 449
  ident: bib0090
  article-title: Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse
  publication-title: Nat. Methods
– volume: 57
  start-page: 215
  year: 2009
  end-page: 220
  ident: bib0095
  article-title: Results of a survey of attitudes of dairy veterinarians in New Zealand regarding painful procedures and conditions in cattle
  publication-title: N.Z. Vet. J.
– volume: 112
  start-page: 348
  year: 2013
  end-page: 354
  ident: bib0135
  article-title: Adjusting for multiple clinical observers in an unbalanced study design using latent class models of true within-herd lameness prevalence in Danish dairy herds
  publication-title: Prev. Vet. Med.
– volume: 238
  start-page: 755
  year: 2011
  end-page: 767
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: Analgesic drug administration and attitudes about analgesia in cattle among bovine practitioners in the United States
  publication-title: JAVMA—J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
– volume: 9
  start-page: e92281
  year: 2014
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 89
  start-page: 3047
  year: 2006
  end-page: 3051
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Short communication: behavioral and physiological indicators of sensitivity or chronic pain following tail docking
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
– volume: 148
  start-page: 525
  year: 2001
  end-page: 531
  ident: bib0060
  article-title: Development of a behaviour-based scale to measure acute pain in dogs
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
– volume: 165
  start-page: 254
  year: 2009
  end-page: 258
  ident: bib0080
  article-title: Attitudes of veterinary students to pain in cattle
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 605
  year: 2003
  end-page: 610
  ident: bib0130
  article-title: Subjective and objective assessment of pain and discomfort due to lameness in dairy cattle
  publication-title: Anim. Welf.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 2045
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2050
  ident: bib0150
  article-title: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats
  publication-title: Vet. Med.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1129
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1136
  ident: bib0055
  article-title: Factors affecting Canadian veterinarians’ use of analgesics when dehorning beef and dairy calves
  publication-title: Can. Vet. J.—Rev. Vet. Can.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 124
  year: 2003
  end-page: 137
  ident: bib0140
  article-title: Preliminary evaluation of a behaviour-based system for assessment of post-operative pain in horses following arthroscopic surgery
  publication-title: Vet. Anaesth. Analg.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1
  year: 2002
  end-page: 19
  ident: bib0175
  article-title: Diagnosing and treating pain in the horse—where are we today?
  publication-title: Vet. Clin. North Am.—Equine Pract.
– volume: 100
  start-page: 64
  year: 2006
  end-page: 76
  ident: bib0185
  article-title: Identifying and preventing pain in animals
  publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
– start-page: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: bib0100
  article-title: The assessment of post-vasectomy pain in mice using behaviour and the mouse grimace scale
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 80
  start-page: 68
  year: 2002
  end-page: 78
  ident: bib0050
  article-title: The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows
  publication-title: J. Anim. Sci.
– volume: 42
  start-page: 103
  year: 2015
  end-page: 114
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: An equine pain face
  publication-title: Vet. Anaesth. Analg.
– start-page: 61
  year: 1997
  end-page: 74
  ident: bib0045
  article-title: Through a glass darkly: using behavior to assess pain
  publication-title: Seminars in Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (Small Animal)
– volume: 101
  start-page: 121
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0035
  article-title: Analgesia from a veterinary perspective
  publication-title: Br. J. Anaesth.
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aen087
– volume: 89
  start-page: 3047
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0025
  article-title: Short communication: behavioral and physiological indicators of sensitivity or chronic pain following tail docking
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
  doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72578-4
– start-page: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0075
  article-title: Evaluation of EMLA cream for preventing pain during tattooing of rabbits: changes in physiological, behavioural and facial expression responses
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 80
  start-page: 31
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0145
  article-title: Identification of potential physiological and behavioral indicators of postoperative pain in horses after exploratory celiotomy for colic
  publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00205-8
– volume: 30
  start-page: 126-+
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0065
  article-title: Recognition and management of pain in cattle
  publication-title: Practice
  doi: 10.1136/inpract.30.3.126
– volume: 116
  start-page: 431
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0120
  article-title: Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
  doi: 10.1136/vr.116.16.431
– volume: 75
  start-page: 266
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0125
  article-title: Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements
  publication-title: J. Anim. Sci.
  doi: 10.2527/1997.751266x
– volume: 148
  start-page: 525
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0060
  article-title: Development of a behaviour-based scale to measure acute pain in dogs
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
  doi: 10.1136/vr.148.17.525
– volume: 37
  start-page: 171
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0110
  article-title: Analgesic efficacy of intra-articular morphine in experimentally induced radiocarpal synovitis in horses
  publication-title: Vet. Anaesth. Analg.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00521.x
– volume: 42
  start-page: 103
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0040
  article-title: An equine pain face
  publication-title: Vet. Anaesth. Analg.
  doi: 10.1111/vaa.12212
– start-page: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0100
  article-title: The assessment of post-vasectomy pain in mice using behaviour and the mouse grimace scale
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 30
  start-page: 124
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0140
  article-title: Preliminary evaluation of a behaviour-based system for assessment of post-operative pain in horses following arthroscopic surgery
  publication-title: Vet. Anaesth. Analg.
  doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00139.x
– volume: 28
  start-page: 289
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0105
  article-title: Assessment and management of pain in dairy cows with clinical mastitis
  publication-title: Vet. Clin. North Am.—Food Anim. Pract.
  doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.04.002
– volume: 33
  start-page: 159
  year: 1977
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0085
  article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2529310
– volume: 7
  start-page: 55
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0170
  article-title: The Rat Grimace Scale: a partially automated method for quantifying pain in the laboratory rat via facial expressions
  publication-title: Mol. Pain
– start-page: 61
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0045
  article-title: Through a glass darkly: using behavior to assess pain
– volume: 10
  start-page: 2045
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0150
  article-title: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats
  publication-title: Vet. Med.
– volume: 112
  start-page: 348
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0135
  article-title: Adjusting for multiple clinical observers in an unbalanced study design using latent class models of true within-herd lameness prevalence in Danish dairy herds
  publication-title: Prev. Vet. Med.
  doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.002
– volume: 57
  start-page: 215
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0095
  article-title: Results of a survey of attitudes of dairy veterinarians in New Zealand regarding painful procedures and conditions in cattle
  publication-title: N.Z. Vet. J.
  doi: 10.1080/00480169.2009.36904
– volume: 12
  start-page: 605
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0130
  article-title: Subjective and objective assessment of pain and discomfort due to lameness in dairy cattle
  publication-title: Anim. Welf.
  doi: 10.1017/S0962728600026257
– volume: 10
  start-page: 200
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0015
  article-title: Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu unidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle
  publication-title: BMC Vet. Res.
  doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0200-0
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1932
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0165
  article-title: Pain in animals
  publication-title: Textb. Pain
– volume: 96
  start-page: 177
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0155
  article-title: The use of diazepam as a pharmacological validation of eye white as an indicator of emotional state in dairy cows
  publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.008
– volume: 16
  start-page: 123
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0115
  article-title: Sickness behaviour and its relevance to animal welfare assessment at the group level
  publication-title: Anim. Welf.
  doi: 10.1017/S0962728600031146
– volume: 167
  start-page: 256
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0180
  article-title: Scandinavian bovine practitioners’ attitudes to the use of analgesics in cattle
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
  doi: 10.1136/vr.c3851
– volume: 26
  start-page: 315
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0020
  article-title: Neuropathic pain management in chronic laminitis
  publication-title: Vet. Clin. North Am.—Equine Pract.
  doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.04.002
– volume: 238
  start-page: 755
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0030
  article-title: Analgesic drug administration and attitudes about analgesia in cattle among bovine practitioners in the United States
  publication-title: JAVMA—J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
  doi: 10.2460/javma.238.6.755
– volume: 80
  start-page: 68
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0050
  article-title: The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows
  publication-title: J. Anim. Sci.
  doi: 10.2527/2002.80168x
– volume: 9
  start-page: e92281
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0010
  article-title: Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092281
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0175
  article-title: Diagnosing and treating pain in the horse—where are we today?
  publication-title: Vet. Clin. North Am.—Equine Pract.
  doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(02)00009-3
– volume: 165
  start-page: 254
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0080
  article-title: Attitudes of veterinary students to pain in cattle
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
  doi: 10.1136/vr.165.9.254
– volume: 159
  start-page: 662-+
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0070
  article-title: Current attitudes of cattle practitioners to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
  doi: 10.1136/vr.159.20.662
– volume: 118
  start-page: 334
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0160
  article-title: Guidelines for the recognition and assessment of pain in animals
  publication-title: Vet. Rec.
  doi: 10.1136/vr.118.12.334
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1129
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0055
  article-title: Factors affecting Canadian veterinarians’ use of analgesics when dehorning beef and dairy calves
  publication-title: Can. Vet. J.—Rev. Vet. Can.
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0041
  article-title: Recognition and quantification of pain in horses: a tutorial review
  publication-title: Equine Vet. Educ.
– volume: 93
  start-page: 2007
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0005
  article-title: Automated methods for detecting lameness and measuring analgesia in dairy cattle
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci.
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2803
– volume: 7
  start-page: 447
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0090
  article-title: Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse
  publication-title: Nat. Methods
  doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1455
– volume: 100
  start-page: 64
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023_bib0185
  article-title: Identifying and preventing pain in animals
  publication-title: Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.013
SSID ssj0005310
Score 2.4831855
Snippet •Cows show specific pain behaviours.•The pain behaviours are altered by analgesia.•The pain behaviours can be summarized in a pain scale. Pain compromises the...
Pain compromises the welfare of animals. A prerequisite for being able to alleviate pain is that we are able to recognize it. Potential behavioural signs of...
SourceID swepub
proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 25
SubjectTerms analgesics
Animal and Dairy Science
animal behavior
animal welfare
clinical examination
Clinical Science
cows
Dairy cattle
ears
head
herds
Husdjursvetenskap
Klinisk vetenskap
pain
Pain behaviour
Pain evaluation
Pain face
Pain scale
Title Pain evaluation in dairy cattle
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.023
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1746895413
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1846315118
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/75386
Volume 171
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB4hEBKXqiytupRHkKrewm7WduwcEQItXYFQW1rUi-X4IQWhLGJ3D1z62zvjJMtyaDn0FDmZiayxPfONPTMG-MSC8FxInvKghrR1k6VG8pCWnjlpVciLmD52eZWPb_iXW3G7BqddLgyFVba6v9HpUVu3bwatNAcPVTX4hmBFoTEmSIOGKKckPs4lzfLj3ythHixWJCDilKhXsoTvjumQ2NQVZaRnIpbyHLG_GahVALpaVDQaovO38KZFkMlJ08ltWPN1D7aWiuypB70fFOMSE22Ty_bsvAebv6bx-w4cXpuqTp7rfCfYcqZCahtLGr-Dm_Oz76fjtL0oIbWC8XmKNjYIYYND90Op3DjpEFfwUTDSDU05GnqWoefhXYloMLCMIZstcbkGKa20jr2H9Xpa-w-QZC63QqnSFCxwi_DQFnSxKf5MDA0y9UF00tG2rSJOl1nc6y5c7E53UtUkVU23XI5YHwZLvoemjsarHEUnfP1iRmhU9q_yHnWjpXG50BmIqf10MdMohlwVAk33P2gQk7GMXK8-fG6GetlnqsY9u1-U5pEeeuY1-nsq3_2Pzn6ELYmtZl9nD9bnjwu_j0hnXh7EqXwAGycXk_EVPSdff07-AAwQ_yA
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9tAEB5RECoXVAKoKbS4UtWbSZzdtddHhECBElSpgBCX1XofkiPkIJIcuPDbmVnbaXoADj1Z9s5Yq1nvzDfeeQD8YF44LjIecy_79OsmiXXGfVw4ZjMjfZqH9LHRZTq85ue34nYFjttcGAqrbHR_rdODtm6e9Bpp9h7KsvcHwYpEY0yQBg1Rmn-ANY7bl9oYHD4vxXmwUJKAqGMiX0oTHh_SKbGuSkpJT0So5Tlgr1moZQS6XFU0WKLTT7DZQMjoqJ7lFqy4qgMbC0321IHODQW5hEzbaNQcnndg_W4Sxrfh4Lcuq-hvoe8I76wukdqEmsY7cH16cnU8jJtOCbERjM9iNLJeCOMt-h9SptpmFoEFH3id2b4uBn3HEnQ9nC0QDnqWMGQzBe5Xn2UmM5btwmo1qdxniBKbGiFloXPmuUF8aHLqbIovE32NTF0QrXSUacqIUzeLe9XGi41VK1VFUlXU5nLAutBb8D3UhTTe5chb4at_PgmF2v5d3u_taincL3QIois3mU8ViiGVuUDb_QYNgjKWkO_VhZ_1Ui_mTOW4p_fzQj_SRU2dQodPpl_-Y7IH8HF4NbpQF2eXv_Zgg0bqcMF9WJ09zt1XhD2z4lv4rF8A2F3_Bg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pain+evaluation+in+dairy+cattle&rft.jtitle=Applied+animal+behaviour+science&rft.au=Haubro+Andersen%2C+Pia&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.issn=1872-9045&rft.volume=171&rft.spage=25&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.applanim.2015.08.023&rft.externalDocID=oai_slubar_slu_se_75386
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0168-1591&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0168-1591&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0168-1591&client=summon