Combining tau-PET and fMRI meta-analyses for patient-centered prediction of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease
Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity. Thus, tau-PET may allow precision-medicine prediction of individual tau-related cognitive trajectories, which can be important for dete...
Saved in:
Published in | Alzheimer's research & therapy Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 166 - 12 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central
07.11.2022
BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity. Thus, tau-PET may allow precision-medicine prediction of individual tau-related cognitive trajectories, which can be important for determining patient-specific cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine whether tau-PET in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions, identified via fMRI meta-analyses, allows the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. Further, we aimed to determine whether tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composites capture patient-specific cognitive trajectories more sensitively than conventional cognitive measures.
We included Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants classified as controls (i.e., amyloid-negative, cognitively normal, n = 121) or Alzheimer's disease-spectrum (i.e., amyloid-positive, cognitively normal to dementia, n = 140), plus 111 AVID-1451-A05 participants for independent validation (controls/Alzheimer's disease-spectrum=46/65). All participants underwent baseline
F-flortaucipir tau-PET, amyloid-PET, and longitudinal cognitive testing to assess annual cognitive changes (i.e., episodic memory, language, executive functioning, visuospatial). Cognitive changes were calculated using linear mixed models. Independent meta-analytical task-fMRI activation maps for each included cognitive domain were obtained from the Neurosynth database and applied to tau-PET to determine tau-PET signal in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions. In bootstrapped linear regression, we assessed the strength of the relationship (i.e., partial R
) between cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET vs. global or temporal-lobe tau-PET and cognitive changes. Further, we used tau-PET-based prediction of domain-specific decline to compose personalized cognitive composites that were tailored to capture patient-specific cognitive decline.
In both amyloid-positive cohorts (ADNI [age = 75.99±7.69] and A05 [age = 74.03±9.03]), cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET outperformed global and temporal-lobe tau-PET for predicting future cognitive decline in episodic memory, language, executive functioning, and visuospatial abilities. Further, a tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composite across cognitive domains enhanced the sensitivity to assess cognitive decline in amyloid-positive subjects, yielding lower sample sizes required for detecting simulated intervention effects compared to conventional cognitive endpoints (i.e., memory composite, global cognitive composite). However, the latter effect was less strong in A05 compared to the ADNI cohort.
Combining tau-PET with task-fMRI-derived maps of major cognitive domains facilitates the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. This approach may help to increase the sensitivity to detect Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive decline and to determine personalized cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity. Thus, tau-PET may allow precision-medicine prediction of individual tau-related cognitive trajectories, which can be important for determining patient-specific cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine whether tau-PET in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions, identified via fMRI meta-analyses, allows the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. Further, we aimed to determine whether tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composites capture patient-specific cognitive trajectories more sensitively than conventional cognitive measures. Methods We included Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants classified as controls (i.e., amyloid-negative, cognitively normal, n = 121) or Alzheimer's disease-spectrum (i.e., amyloid-positive, cognitively normal to dementia, n = 140), plus 111 AVID-1451-A05 participants for independent validation (controls/Alzheimer's disease-spectrum=46/65). All participants underwent baseline F-18-flortaucipir tau-PET, amyloid-PET, and longitudinal cognitive testing to assess annual cognitive changes (i.e., episodic memory, language, executive functioning, visuospatial). Cognitive changes were calculated using linear mixed models. Independent meta-analytical task-fMRI activation maps for each included cognitive domain were obtained from the Neurosynth database and applied to tau-PET to determine tau-PET signal in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions. In bootstrapped linear regression, we assessed the strength of the relationship (i.e., partial R-2) between cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET vs. global or temporal-lobe tau-PET and cognitive changes. Further, we used tau-PET-based prediction of domain-specific decline to compose personalized cognitive composites that were tailored to capture patient-specific cognitive decline. Results In both amyloid-positive cohorts (ADNI [age = 75.99 +/- 7.69] and A05 [age = 74.03 +/- 9.03]), cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET outperformed global and temporal-lobe tau-PET for predicting future cognitive decline in episodic memory, language, executive functioning, and visuospatial abilities. Further, a tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composite across cognitive domains enhanced the sensitivity to assess cognitive decline in amyloid-positive subjects, yielding lower sample sizes required for detecting simulated intervention effects compared to conventional cognitive endpoints (i.e., memory composite, global cognitive composite). However, the latter effect was less strong in A05 compared to the ADNI cohort. Conclusion Combining tau-PET with task-fMRI-derived maps of major cognitive domains facilitates the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. This approach may help to increase the sensitivity to detect Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive decline and to determine personalized cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Abstract Background Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity. Thus, tau-PET may allow precision-medicine prediction of individual tau-related cognitive trajectories, which can be important for determining patient-specific cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine whether tau-PET in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions, identified via fMRI meta-analyses, allows the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. Further, we aimed to determine whether tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composites capture patient-specific cognitive trajectories more sensitively than conventional cognitive measures. Methods We included Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants classified as controls (i.e., amyloid-negative, cognitively normal, n = 121) or Alzheimer’s disease-spectrum (i.e., amyloid-positive, cognitively normal to dementia, n = 140), plus 111 AVID-1451-A05 participants for independent validation (controls/Alzheimer’s disease-spectrum=46/65). All participants underwent baseline 18F-flortaucipir tau-PET, amyloid-PET, and longitudinal cognitive testing to assess annual cognitive changes (i.e., episodic memory, language, executive functioning, visuospatial). Cognitive changes were calculated using linear mixed models. Independent meta-analytical task-fMRI activation maps for each included cognitive domain were obtained from the Neurosynth database and applied to tau-PET to determine tau-PET signal in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions. In bootstrapped linear regression, we assessed the strength of the relationship (i.e., partial R 2) between cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET vs. global or temporal-lobe tau-PET and cognitive changes. Further, we used tau-PET-based prediction of domain-specific decline to compose personalized cognitive composites that were tailored to capture patient-specific cognitive decline. Results In both amyloid-positive cohorts (ADNI [age = 75.99±7.69] and A05 [age = 74.03±9.03]), cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET outperformed global and temporal-lobe tau-PET for predicting future cognitive decline in episodic memory, language, executive functioning, and visuospatial abilities. Further, a tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composite across cognitive domains enhanced the sensitivity to assess cognitive decline in amyloid-positive subjects, yielding lower sample sizes required for detecting simulated intervention effects compared to conventional cognitive endpoints (i.e., memory composite, global cognitive composite). However, the latter effect was less strong in A05 compared to the ADNI cohort. Conclusion Combining tau-PET with task-fMRI-derived maps of major cognitive domains facilitates the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. This approach may help to increase the sensitivity to detect Alzheimer’s disease-related cognitive decline and to determine personalized cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity. Thus, tau-PET may allow precision-medicine prediction of individual tau-related cognitive trajectories, which can be important for determining patient-specific cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine whether tau-PET in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions, identified via fMRI meta-analyses, allows the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. Further, we aimed to determine whether tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composites capture patient-specific cognitive trajectories more sensitively than conventional cognitive measures.BACKGROUNDTau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity. Thus, tau-PET may allow precision-medicine prediction of individual tau-related cognitive trajectories, which can be important for determining patient-specific cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine whether tau-PET in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions, identified via fMRI meta-analyses, allows the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. Further, we aimed to determine whether tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composites capture patient-specific cognitive trajectories more sensitively than conventional cognitive measures.We included Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants classified as controls (i.e., amyloid-negative, cognitively normal, n = 121) or Alzheimer's disease-spectrum (i.e., amyloid-positive, cognitively normal to dementia, n = 140), plus 111 AVID-1451-A05 participants for independent validation (controls/Alzheimer's disease-spectrum=46/65). All participants underwent baseline 18F-flortaucipir tau-PET, amyloid-PET, and longitudinal cognitive testing to assess annual cognitive changes (i.e., episodic memory, language, executive functioning, visuospatial). Cognitive changes were calculated using linear mixed models. Independent meta-analytical task-fMRI activation maps for each included cognitive domain were obtained from the Neurosynth database and applied to tau-PET to determine tau-PET signal in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions. In bootstrapped linear regression, we assessed the strength of the relationship (i.e., partial R2) between cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET vs. global or temporal-lobe tau-PET and cognitive changes. Further, we used tau-PET-based prediction of domain-specific decline to compose personalized cognitive composites that were tailored to capture patient-specific cognitive decline.METHODSWe included Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants classified as controls (i.e., amyloid-negative, cognitively normal, n = 121) or Alzheimer's disease-spectrum (i.e., amyloid-positive, cognitively normal to dementia, n = 140), plus 111 AVID-1451-A05 participants for independent validation (controls/Alzheimer's disease-spectrum=46/65). All participants underwent baseline 18F-flortaucipir tau-PET, amyloid-PET, and longitudinal cognitive testing to assess annual cognitive changes (i.e., episodic memory, language, executive functioning, visuospatial). Cognitive changes were calculated using linear mixed models. Independent meta-analytical task-fMRI activation maps for each included cognitive domain were obtained from the Neurosynth database and applied to tau-PET to determine tau-PET signal in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions. In bootstrapped linear regression, we assessed the strength of the relationship (i.e., partial R2) between cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET vs. global or temporal-lobe tau-PET and cognitive changes. Further, we used tau-PET-based prediction of domain-specific decline to compose personalized cognitive composites that were tailored to capture patient-specific cognitive decline.In both amyloid-positive cohorts (ADNI [age = 75.99±7.69] and A05 [age = 74.03±9.03]), cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET outperformed global and temporal-lobe tau-PET for predicting future cognitive decline in episodic memory, language, executive functioning, and visuospatial abilities. Further, a tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composite across cognitive domains enhanced the sensitivity to assess cognitive decline in amyloid-positive subjects, yielding lower sample sizes required for detecting simulated intervention effects compared to conventional cognitive endpoints (i.e., memory composite, global cognitive composite). However, the latter effect was less strong in A05 compared to the ADNI cohort.RESULTSIn both amyloid-positive cohorts (ADNI [age = 75.99±7.69] and A05 [age = 74.03±9.03]), cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET outperformed global and temporal-lobe tau-PET for predicting future cognitive decline in episodic memory, language, executive functioning, and visuospatial abilities. Further, a tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composite across cognitive domains enhanced the sensitivity to assess cognitive decline in amyloid-positive subjects, yielding lower sample sizes required for detecting simulated intervention effects compared to conventional cognitive endpoints (i.e., memory composite, global cognitive composite). However, the latter effect was less strong in A05 compared to the ADNI cohort.Combining tau-PET with task-fMRI-derived maps of major cognitive domains facilitates the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. This approach may help to increase the sensitivity to detect Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive decline and to determine personalized cognitive endpoints in clinical trials.CONCLUSIONCombining tau-PET with task-fMRI-derived maps of major cognitive domains facilitates the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. This approach may help to increase the sensitivity to detect Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive decline and to determine personalized cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Background Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity. Thus, tau-PET may allow precision-medicine prediction of individual tau-related cognitive trajectories, which can be important for determining patient-specific cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine whether tau-PET in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions, identified via fMRI meta-analyses, allows the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. Further, we aimed to determine whether tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composites capture patient-specific cognitive trajectories more sensitively than conventional cognitive measures. Methods We included Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants classified as controls (i.e., amyloid-negative, cognitively normal, n = 121) or Alzheimer’s disease-spectrum (i.e., amyloid-positive, cognitively normal to dementia, n = 140), plus 111 AVID-1451-A05 participants for independent validation (controls/Alzheimer’s disease-spectrum=46/65). All participants underwent baseline 18F-flortaucipir tau-PET, amyloid-PET, and longitudinal cognitive testing to assess annual cognitive changes (i.e., episodic memory, language, executive functioning, visuospatial). Cognitive changes were calculated using linear mixed models. Independent meta-analytical task-fMRI activation maps for each included cognitive domain were obtained from the Neurosynth database and applied to tau-PET to determine tau-PET signal in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions. In bootstrapped linear regression, we assessed the strength of the relationship (i.e., partial R2) between cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET vs. global or temporal-lobe tau-PET and cognitive changes. Further, we used tau-PET-based prediction of domain-specific decline to compose personalized cognitive composites that were tailored to capture patient-specific cognitive decline. Results In both amyloid-positive cohorts (ADNI [age = 75.99±7.69] and A05 [age = 74.03±9.03]), cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET outperformed global and temporal-lobe tau-PET for predicting future cognitive decline in episodic memory, language, executive functioning, and visuospatial abilities. Further, a tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composite across cognitive domains enhanced the sensitivity to assess cognitive decline in amyloid-positive subjects, yielding lower sample sizes required for detecting simulated intervention effects compared to conventional cognitive endpoints (i.e., memory composite, global cognitive composite). However, the latter effect was less strong in A05 compared to the ADNI cohort. Conclusion Combining tau-PET with task-fMRI-derived maps of major cognitive domains facilitates the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. This approach may help to increase the sensitivity to detect Alzheimer’s disease-related cognitive decline and to determine personalized cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity. Thus, tau-PET may allow precision-medicine prediction of individual tau-related cognitive trajectories, which can be important for determining patient-specific cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine whether tau-PET in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions, identified via fMRI meta-analyses, allows the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. Further, we aimed to determine whether tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composites capture patient-specific cognitive trajectories more sensitively than conventional cognitive measures. We included Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants classified as controls (i.e., amyloid-negative, cognitively normal, n = 121) or Alzheimer's disease-spectrum (i.e., amyloid-positive, cognitively normal to dementia, n = 140), plus 111 AVID-1451-A05 participants for independent validation (controls/Alzheimer's disease-spectrum=46/65). All participants underwent baseline F-flortaucipir tau-PET, amyloid-PET, and longitudinal cognitive testing to assess annual cognitive changes (i.e., episodic memory, language, executive functioning, visuospatial). Cognitive changes were calculated using linear mixed models. Independent meta-analytical task-fMRI activation maps for each included cognitive domain were obtained from the Neurosynth database and applied to tau-PET to determine tau-PET signal in cognitive-domain-specific brain regions. In bootstrapped linear regression, we assessed the strength of the relationship (i.e., partial R ) between cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET vs. global or temporal-lobe tau-PET and cognitive changes. Further, we used tau-PET-based prediction of domain-specific decline to compose personalized cognitive composites that were tailored to capture patient-specific cognitive decline. In both amyloid-positive cohorts (ADNI [age = 75.99±7.69] and A05 [age = 74.03±9.03]), cognitive-domain-specific tau-PET outperformed global and temporal-lobe tau-PET for predicting future cognitive decline in episodic memory, language, executive functioning, and visuospatial abilities. Further, a tau-PET-informed personalized cognitive composite across cognitive domains enhanced the sensitivity to assess cognitive decline in amyloid-positive subjects, yielding lower sample sizes required for detecting simulated intervention effects compared to conventional cognitive endpoints (i.e., memory composite, global cognitive composite). However, the latter effect was less strong in A05 compared to the ADNI cohort. Combining tau-PET with task-fMRI-derived maps of major cognitive domains facilitates the prediction of domain-specific cognitive decline. This approach may help to increase the sensitivity to detect Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive decline and to determine personalized cognitive endpoints in clinical trials. |
ArticleNumber | 166 |
Author | Biel, Davina Luan, Ying Moscoso, Alexis Pontecorvo, Michael Steward, Anna Shcherbinin, Sergey Brendel, Matthias Higgins, Ixavier A. Rubinski, Anna Ewers, Michael Franzmeier, Nicolai Zheng, Lukai Dewenter, Anna Otero Svaldi, Diana Schöll, Michael Hager, Paul Römer, Sebastian |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Davina orcidid: 0000-0002-2597-1992 surname: Biel fullname: Biel, Davina – sequence: 2 givenname: Ying surname: Luan fullname: Luan, Ying – sequence: 3 givenname: Matthias surname: Brendel fullname: Brendel, Matthias – sequence: 4 givenname: Paul surname: Hager fullname: Hager, Paul – sequence: 5 givenname: Anna surname: Dewenter fullname: Dewenter, Anna – sequence: 6 givenname: Alexis surname: Moscoso fullname: Moscoso, Alexis – sequence: 7 givenname: Diana surname: Otero Svaldi fullname: Otero Svaldi, Diana – sequence: 8 givenname: Ixavier A. surname: Higgins fullname: Higgins, Ixavier A. – sequence: 9 givenname: Michael surname: Pontecorvo fullname: Pontecorvo, Michael – sequence: 10 givenname: Sebastian surname: Römer fullname: Römer, Sebastian – sequence: 11 givenname: Anna surname: Steward fullname: Steward, Anna – sequence: 12 givenname: Anna surname: Rubinski fullname: Rubinski, Anna – sequence: 13 givenname: Lukai surname: Zheng fullname: Zheng, Lukai – sequence: 14 givenname: Michael surname: Schöll fullname: Schöll, Michael – sequence: 15 givenname: Sergey surname: Shcherbinin fullname: Shcherbinin, Sergey – sequence: 16 givenname: Michael surname: Ewers fullname: Ewers, Michael – sequence: 17 givenname: Nicolai orcidid: 0000-0001-9736-2283 surname: Franzmeier fullname: Franzmeier, Nicolai |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345046$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/320401$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
BookMark | eNp9ks1u1DAUhSNURNuBF2CBLLFhE_B_7A1SNSowUhEIlbXlODepq8Qe4mSqsuI1eD2eBM9MqTpdsLm2rr9zdG2f0-IoxABF8ZLgt4Qo-S4RRrQoMaUlJgSLUjwpTkglVKmJZkcP9sfFaUrXGEtJFX9WHDPJuMBcnhSbZRxqH3zo0GTn8uv5JbKhQe3nbys0wGRLG2x_myChNo5obScPYSpdLjBCg9a5eDf5GFBskYtd8JPfAGrA9T4A8gGd9T-vwA8w_vn1O6HGJ7AJnhdPW9sneHG3LorvH84vl5_Kiy8fV8uzi9IJxqdSVODaWnHd8rbFUqtWNNqBs0oq4jjBtVMMC0sll5bIWhGBW6g0sLrWllG2KFZ73ybaa7Me_WDHWxOtN7tGHDtjx8m7HoxzrVUWuAXmuBBSOUoZJozV3DHG6-xV7r3SDazn-sCtm9cmt7rZJDCMYp6Fi-L9ns_wAM32zUbbH8gOT4K_Ml3cGC2Zpkpmgzd3BmP8MUOazOCTg763AeKcDK0YJ1JUeou-foRex3nMX7ejqkpTjXWmXj2c6H6Uf3HIAN0DbowpjdDeIwSbbebMPnMmZ87sMmdEFqlHIucnu81EvpXv_yf9CwQQ3ZA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2024_01_014 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41583_023_00731_8 crossref_primary_10_31083_j_jin2206172 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaneurol_2023_4038 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2023_1168840 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41380_023_02230_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_WCO_0000000000001198 crossref_primary_10_1126_scitranslmed_adp2564 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_023_44374_w crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci14060575 crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awae327 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_023_01302_w crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_024_01848_9 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.021 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.02.002 10.15252/emmm.202012308 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005649 10.1038/s41380-018-0342-8 10.1093/brain/awaa058 10.1093/brain/awy059 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0413 10.1093/brain/awab114 10.1186/s13195-018-0401-z 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.03.009 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002251 10.1093/brain/awz090 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00066-1 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1858 10.1038/s41591-021-01369-8 10.1093/cercor/bhs410 10.1001/archneur.64.9.1323 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3 10.3233/JAD-200808 10.1016/j.trci.2019.04.001 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 10.1038/s41591-021-01309-6 10.1126/sciadv.abd1327 10.1002/trc2.12072 10.1038/s41467-020-15701-2 10.1101/cshperspect.a006171 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3263-16.2017 10.1007/s11682-012-9186-z 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5505 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3314 10.1186/s13054-016-1388-0 10.1186/s13195-021-00813-8 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012022 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3539-11.2011 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.01.007 10.1038/nmeth.1635 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 10.1007/BF00308809 10.1093/brain/awx243 10.1186/s13195-018-0455-y 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 10.1093/brain/awy053 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0 10.1186/s13195-021-00880-x 10.1038/s41380-021-01263-2 10.1093/brain/aww027 10.1038/s41593-018-0289-8 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022. The Author(s). 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022. The Author(s). – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2022 |
CorporateAuthor | the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative – name: Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM ADTPV AOWAS F1U DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s13195-022-01105-5 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1758-9193 |
EndPage | 12 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ccfa8ae4ae3c45568c2230133b4c334b oai_gup_ub_gu_se_320401 PMC9639286 36345046 10_1186_s13195_022_01105_5 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23M 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFS ACIHN ACJQM ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AEAQA AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIAM AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HZ~ IAO IEA IHR IHW INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M~E O5R O5S O9- OK1 P2P P6G PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP -56 -5G -BR 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM 4.4 ADTPV AHSBF AOWAS EJD F1U H13 HYE PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-57ecfb849f4ff0698f5d9ceca8681c410bc8305a2646a16b8150fe79e3bb9a323 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1758-9193 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:24 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 06:44:16 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:39:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:23:34 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 05:26:03 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:53:41 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:38:52 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:53 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Cognitive decline fMRI Alzheimer’s disease Precision medicine Tau-PET |
Language | English |
License | 2022. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c534t-57ecfb849f4ff0698f5d9ceca8681c410bc8305a2646a16b8150fe79e3bb9a323 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-2597-1992 0000-0001-9736-2283 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2737792909?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 36345046 |
PQID | 2737792909 |
PQPubID | 2040174 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ccfa8ae4ae3c45568c2230133b4c334b swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_320401 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9639286 proquest_miscellaneous_2734165796 proquest_journals_2737792909 pubmed_primary_36345046 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_022_01105_5 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13195_022_01105_5 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-11-07 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-11-07 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2022 text: 2022-11-07 day: 07 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Alzheimer's research & therapy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Alzheimers Res Ther |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | M Ewers (1105_CR33) 2020; 12 R Ossenkoppele (1105_CR14) 2016; 139 B Dubois (1105_CR36) 2007; 6 M Gallagher (1105_CR35) 2011; 21 NL Komarova (1105_CR4) 2011; 7 PK Crane (1105_CR29) 2012; 6 CR Jack Jr (1105_CR2) 2018; 14 MA Busche (1105_CR41) 2019; 22 MD Devous Sr (1105_CR16) 2021; 80 M Scholl (1105_CR27) 2016; 89 L Lemoine (1105_CR22) 2018; 10 GM McKhann (1105_CR21) 2011; 7 PK Crane (1105_CR38) 2012; 6 TN Rubin (1105_CR18) 2017; 13 G Devi (1105_CR7) 2018; 10 TJ Iwashyna (1105_CR19) 2016; 20 MS Albert (1105_CR20) 2011; 7 D Berron (1105_CR51) 2021; 144 MJ Pontecorvo (1105_CR12) 2019; 142 M Lu (1105_CR13) 2021; 78 MF Folstein (1105_CR34) 1975; 12 J Harrison (1105_CR39) 2007; 64 E Kocagoncu (1105_CR44) 2020; 92 JW Vogel (1105_CR25) 2020; 11 CR Jack Jr (1105_CR28) 2018; 141 A Leuzy (1105_CR23) 2019; 24 M Malek-Ahmadi (1105_CR31) 2018; 10 JP Chhatwal (1105_CR43) 2018; 141 N Franzmeier (1105_CR24) 2020; 6 CJ Swanson (1105_CR8) 2021; 13 AE Blanken (1105_CR49) 2020; 3 AS Fleisher (1105_CR1) 2015; 72 SE Choi (1105_CR30) 2020; 6 T Yarkoni (1105_CR17) 2011; 8 Y Liu (1105_CR42) 2014; 24 R Ossenkoppele (1105_CR9) 2021; 78 B Dubois (1105_CR37) 2014; 13 C Ballard (1105_CR6) 2019; 5 AM Tetreault (1105_CR40) 2020; 143 B Dubois (1105_CR3) 2021; 20 D Biel (1105_CR10) 2021; 13 MP van den Heuvel (1105_CR46) 2011; 31 H Braak (1105_CR26) 1991; 82 S Weintraub (1105_CR47) 2012; 2 A Bejanin (1105_CR15) 2017; 140 M Bucci (1105_CR11) 2021; 26 RJ Jutten (1105_CR48) 2021; 96 JB Langbaum (1105_CR32) 2014; 10 AP Schultz (1105_CR45) 2017; 37 S Salloway (1105_CR50) 2021; 27 JW Vogel (1105_CR5) 2021; 27 |
References_xml | – volume: 21 start-page: 929 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 1105_CR35 publication-title: Curr Opin Neurobiol doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.021 – volume: 10 start-page: 666 issue: 6 year: 2014 ident: 1105_CR32 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.02.002 – volume: 12 start-page: e12308 issue: 9 year: 2020 ident: 1105_CR33 publication-title: EMBO Mol Med doi: 10.15252/emmm.202012308 – volume: 13 start-page: e1005649 issue: 10 year: 2017 ident: 1105_CR18 publication-title: PLoS Comput Biol doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005649 – volume: 24 start-page: 1112 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: 1105_CR23 publication-title: Mol Psychiatry doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0342-8 – volume: 143 start-page: 1249 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 1105_CR40 publication-title: Brain. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa058 – volume: 141 start-page: 1517 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 1105_CR28 publication-title: Brain. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy059 – volume: 3 start-page: e200413 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 1105_CR49 publication-title: JAMA Netw Open doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0413 – volume: 144 start-page: 2771 issue: 9 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR51 publication-title: Brain. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab114 – volume: 10 start-page: 90 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1105_CR31 publication-title: Alzheimers Res Ther doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0401-z – volume: 7 start-page: 270 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 1105_CR20 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 – volume: 92 start-page: 141 year: 2020 ident: 1105_CR44 publication-title: Neurobiol Aging doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.03.009 – volume: 7 start-page: e1002251 issue: 11 year: 2011 ident: 1105_CR4 publication-title: PLoS Comput Biol doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002251 – volume: 142 start-page: 1723 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 1105_CR12 publication-title: Brain. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz090 – volume: 89 start-page: 971 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 1105_CR27 publication-title: Neuron. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028 – volume: 20 start-page: 484 issue: 6 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR3 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00066-1 – volume: 78 start-page: 961 issue: 8 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR9 publication-title: JAMA Neurol doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1858 – volume: 27 start-page: 1187 issue: 7 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR50 publication-title: Nat Med doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01369-8 – volume: 24 start-page: 1422 issue: 6 year: 2014 ident: 1105_CR42 publication-title: Cereb Cortex doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs410 – volume: 64 start-page: 1323 issue: 9 year: 2007 ident: 1105_CR39 publication-title: Arch Neurol doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.9.1323 – volume: 6 start-page: 734 issue: 8 year: 2007 ident: 1105_CR36 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3 – volume: 80 start-page: 1091 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR16 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis doi: 10.3233/JAD-200808 – volume: 5 start-page: 164 year: 2019 ident: 1105_CR6 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.04.001 – volume: 14 start-page: 535 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 1105_CR2 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 – volume: 27 start-page: 871 issue: 5 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR5 publication-title: Nat Med doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01309-6 – volume: 6 start-page: eabd1327 issue: 48 year: 2020 ident: 1105_CR24 publication-title: Sci Adv doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd1327 – volume: 6 start-page: e12072 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 1105_CR30 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) doi: 10.1002/trc2.12072 – volume: 11 start-page: 2612 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 1105_CR25 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15701-2 – volume: 2 start-page: a006171 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 1105_CR47 publication-title: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006171 – volume: 37 start-page: 4323 issue: 16 year: 2017 ident: 1105_CR45 publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3263-16.2017 – volume: 6 start-page: 502 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 1105_CR29 publication-title: Brain Imaging Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9186-z – volume: 78 start-page: 445 issue: 4 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR13 publication-title: JAMA Neurol doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5505 – volume: 72 start-page: 316 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 1105_CR1 publication-title: JAMA Neurol doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3314 – volume: 20 start-page: 218 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 1105_CR19 publication-title: Crit Care doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1388-0 – volume: 13 start-page: 80 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR8 publication-title: Alzheimers Res Ther doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00813-8 – volume: 96 start-page: e2673 issue: 22 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR48 publication-title: Neurology. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012022 – volume: 31 start-page: 15775 issue: 44 year: 2011 ident: 1105_CR46 publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3539-11.2011 – volume: 10 start-page: 232 year: 2018 ident: 1105_CR22 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.01.007 – volume: 6 start-page: 502 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 1105_CR38 publication-title: Brain Imaging Behav doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9186-z – volume: 8 start-page: 665 issue: 8 year: 2011 ident: 1105_CR17 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1635 – volume: 7 start-page: 263 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 1105_CR21 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 – volume: 82 start-page: 239 issue: 4 year: 1991 ident: 1105_CR26 publication-title: Acta Neuropathol doi: 10.1007/BF00308809 – volume: 140 start-page: 3286 issue: 12 year: 2017 ident: 1105_CR15 publication-title: Brain. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx243 – volume: 10 start-page: 122 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1105_CR7 publication-title: Alzheimers Res Ther doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0455-y – volume: 12 start-page: 189 issue: 3 year: 1975 ident: 1105_CR34 publication-title: J Psychiatr Res doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 – volume: 141 start-page: 1486 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 1105_CR43 publication-title: Brain. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy053 – volume: 13 start-page: 614 issue: 6 year: 2014 ident: 1105_CR37 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0 – volume: 13 start-page: 137 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR10 publication-title: Alzheimers Res Ther doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00880-x – volume: 26 start-page: 5888 issue: 10 year: 2021 ident: 1105_CR11 publication-title: Mol Psychiatry doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01263-2 – volume: 139 start-page: 1551 issue: Pt 5 year: 2016 ident: 1105_CR14 publication-title: Brain. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww027 – volume: 22 start-page: 57 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1105_CR41 publication-title: Nat Neurosci doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0289-8 |
SSID | ssj0066284 |
Score | 2.3711326 |
Snippet | Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom heterogeneity.... Background Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom... Background Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive symptom... Abstract Background Tau-PET is a prognostic marker for cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease, and the heterogeneity of tau-PET patterns matches cognitive... |
SourceID | doaj swepub pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 166 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis Alzheimer's disease Amyloid - metabolism Amyloid beta-Peptides - metabolism association workgroups Brain Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain - metabolism Clinical trials Cognitive ability Cognitive decline Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology criteria Dementia diagnostic guidelines fMRI functional connectivity Humans impairment Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Medical imaging medicine Memory national institute Neurodegeneration Neuroimaging Neurosciences Neurosciences & Neurology Neurovetenskaper Pathology Patient-Centered Care Patients Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Precision Precision medicine recommendations tau Proteins - metabolism Tau-PET trials Working groups |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LaxUxFA7SlRtRfF2tEkHcSOhkkskkyyotVaiItNBdSM5N2gvt3MudmS5c-Tf8e_4STzJzBwdFN27zYELO68sk5zuEvC6E47UGzaKXJZPSANMKFKurJSDa9VHmYhOnn9TJufx4UV38UuorvQkb6IGHjTsAiE67IF0QIBNdFmBAQ9wivAQhpE_eF2Pe7jA1-GCl0OvuUmS0Omi54DkTOT1DQETBqlkYymz9f4KYv7-UnPGJ5hh0fJ_cG8EjPRwW_YDcCc1Dcosm7XOZB9q5nn0-OqOuWdJ4-uUDvQmdYy7zjoSWIj6lI48qS59KZTrpZpuuapJ46DrS6TURXYaUNBnoqqGH11-vwuombH98-97S8UrnETk_Pjp7f8LGagoMKiE7VtUBotfSRBljoYyO1dJAAKeV5iB54UGj8TtESMpx5TVCxRhqE4T3xolSPCZ7zboJTwlVUhfgweiQ4Av3pqwNIqPSlypyUGJB-G5zLYxU46nixbXNRw6t7CAQiwKxWSC2WpC305zNQLTx19HvksymkYkkOzeg6thRdey_VGdB9ncSt6PlthbhXF0jZizMgryautHm0kWKa8K6z2MQx6Ys3gV5MijItBKhhKwKiT31THVmS533NKurzOuNvtCUGme-GZRsNuWy31hsuuxtG6wo0ffyZ_9jE56Tu2Wyi_SnvN4ne922Dy8QZ3X-ZTapn0c3Jrc priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Combining tau-PET and fMRI meta-analyses for patient-centered prediction of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345046 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2737792909 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2734165796 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9639286 https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/320401 https://doaj.org/article/ccfa8ae4ae3c45568c2230133b4c334b |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3LatwwFBVtsummtPQ1aTqoULopIrYly9KqJMOEtJAQQgKzE5IsTQYSezoed9FVf6O_1y_plexxMS1ZWg8sfB86vro6F6EPCdVpIawg3rCMMCYtEdxyUuSlBbRrPIvFJs4v-NkN-7rIF33ArenTKnc-MTrqsrYhRn4E22xRwF6eyM_rbyRUjQqnq30JjcdoP1CXhZSuYjH8cHEOvnd3UUbwoyalabyPHJIRAFeQfLQZRc7-_wHNf_MlR6yicSc6fYae9hASH3cyf44eueoF-g6GbWKxB7zVLbmcX2NdldifX33B926riY7sI67BgFJxz6ZKwqtCsU683oQDmyAkXHs85BTh0oWrkw6vKnx89-PWre7d5vfPXw3uD3ZeopvT-fXsjPQ1FYjNKduSvHDWG8GkZ94nXAqfl9I6qwUXqWVpYqwAF6ABJ3GdciMAMHpXSEeNkZpm9BXaq-rKvUGYM5FYY6VwAcSkRmaFBHyUmYz71HI6Qenu4yrbE46Huhd3Kv54CK46gSgQiIoCUfkEfRrmrDu6jQdHnwSZDSMDVXZsqDdL1VuestZroR3TjloW-NYsICIAvtQwSykzE3S4k7jq7bdRf7Vtgt4P3WB54ThFV65u4xhAs-Eu7wS97hRkWAnllOUJg55ipDqjpY57qtVtZPcGjygzATM_dko2mrJs1wqalq1qnKIZeOD04OH1v0VPsqDxIRJeHKK97aZ17wBHbc00GssU7Z_MLy6v4GnGZ9MYk_gDWJ8hcg |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3dbtMwFLam7gJuEIi_jgFGAm6QtSR2HOcCoQ06tWytpqmTdmds1-4qbWlpWhBc8Rq8BA_Fk3DsJEURaHe7jW3Fyjnn8-fY5zsIvYyoijNhBHGaJYSx3BDBDSdZOjHAdrVjodjEcMT7Z-zjeXq-hX41uTD-WmWDiQGoJ3Pj_5HvwTKbZbCWR_m7xWfiq0b509WmhEblFkf221fYspVvBx_Avq-S5LA3ft8ndVUBYlLKViTNrHFasNwx5yKeC5dOcmONElzEhsWRNgKCQAFT4CrmWgBlcjbLLdU6V9QLHQDkbzMKW5kO2j7ojU5OG-znHNC-Sc0RfK-MaRwyoP31B2AyJG0tf6FKwP-o7b83NFs6pmHtO7yL7tSkFe9XXnYPbdniPvoCUKJDeQm8Umty0htjVUywG54O8JVdKaKC3oktMfBiXOu3Ev8qXx4UL5b-iMi7BZ47vLnFhCfWJ2taPCvw_uX3Czu7ssvfP36WuD5KeoDObuR7P0SdYl7YxwhzJiKjTS6sp02xzpMsB0aW6IS72HDaRXHzcaWpJc59pY1LGbY6gsvKIBIMIoNBZNpFbzZjFpXAx7W9D7zNNj29OHd4MF9OZR3r0hinhLJMWWqYV3gzwMGAalPNDKVMd9FuY3FZI0Yp__p3F73YNEOs-wMcVdj5OvQB_uyzh7voUeUgm5lQTlkaMWjJWq7Tmmq7pZhdBD1xwOA8ETDydeVkrSHT9ULCo-lallbSBDA_3rl-_s_Rrf54eCyPB6OjJ-h24r3f_4fPdlFntVzbp8DiVvpZHToYfbrpaP0Dtzpcjw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining+tau-PET+and+fMRI+meta-analyses+for+patient-centered+prediction+of+cognitive+decline+in+Alzheimer%E2%80%99s+disease&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer%27s+research+%26+therapy&rft.au=Biel%2C+Davina&rft.au=Luan%2C+Ying&rft.au=Brendel%2C+Matthias&rft.au=Hager%2C+Paul&rft.date=2022-11-07&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1758-9193&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13195-022-01105-5 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1758-9193&client=summon |