Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar
1. Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species' fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact that species tend to maintain their original climate niche allows predictive maps of invasion risk to anticipate potential invadable...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of animal ecology Vol. 86; no. 5; pp. 1214 - 1223 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
01.09.2017
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | 1. Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species' fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact that species tend to maintain their original climate niche allows predictive maps of invasion risk to anticipate potential invadable areas. Unravelling the mechanisms driving niche shifts can shed light on the management of invasive species. 2. Here, we assessed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa. We also predicted potential invadable areas based on an ensemble of three ecological niche modelling methods, and evaluated the performance of models calibrated with native vs. pooled (native plus invaded) species records. By disentangling the drivers of change on the exotic wild boar population's niches, we found strong evidence for niche conservatism during biological invasion. 3. Ecological niche models calibrated with both native and pooled range records predicted convergent areas. Also, observed niche shifts are mostly explained by niche unfilling, i.e. there are unoccupied areas in the exotic range where climate is analogous to the native range. 4. Niche unfilling is expected as result of recent colonization and ongoing dispersal, and was potentially stronger for the Neotropics, where a recent wave of introductions for pig-farming and game-hunting has led to high wild boar population growth rates. The invasive potential of wild boar in the Neotropics is probably higher than in other regions, which has profound management implications if we are to prevent their invasion into species-rich areas, such as Amazonia, coupled with expansion of African swine fever and possibly great economic losses. 5. Although the originally Eurasian-wide distribution suggests a pre-adaptation to a wide array of climates, the wild boar world-wide invasion does not exhibit evidence of niche evolution. The invasive potential of the wild boar therefore probably lies on the reproductive, dietary and morphological characteristics of this species, coupled with behavioural thermoregulation. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species’ fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact that species tend to maintain their original climate niche allows predictive maps of invasion risk to anticipate potential invadable areas. Unravelling the mechanisms driving niche shifts can shed light on the management of invasive species.
Here, we assessed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa. We also predicted potential invadable areas based on an ensemble of three ecological niche modelling methods, and evaluated the performance of models calibrated with native vs. pooled (native plus invaded) species records. By disentangling the drivers of change on the exotic wild boar population's niches, we found strong evidence for niche conservatism during biological invasion.
Ecological niche models calibrated with both native and pooled range records predicted convergent areas. Also, observed niche shifts are mostly explained by niche unfilling, i.e. there are unoccupied areas in the exotic range where climate is analogous to the native range.
Niche unfilling is expected as result of recent colonization and ongoing dispersal, and was potentially stronger for the Neotropics, where a recent wave of introductions for pig‐farming and game‐hunting has led to high wild boar population growth rates. The invasive potential of wild boar in the Neotropics is probably higher than in other regions, which has profound management implications if we are to prevent their invasion into species‐rich areas, such as Amazonia, coupled with expansion of African swine fever and possibly great economic losses.
Although the originally Eurasian‐wide distribution suggests a pre‐adaptation to a wide array of climates, the wild boar world‐wide invasion does not exhibit evidence of niche evolution. The invasive potential of the wild boar therefore probably lies on the reproductive, dietary and morphological characteristics of this species, coupled with behavioural thermoregulation.
Wild boars are one of the world's worst invasive species, they impact native biodiversity and cause great economic losses. In this paper, the authors found that wild boar invasion does not exhibit evidence of niche evolution. Other reproductive, dietary and morphological characteristics, coupled with behavioural thermoregulation, probably explain this species’ invasive success. Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species’ fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact that species tend to maintain their original climate niche allows predictive maps of invasion risk to anticipate potential invadable areas. Unravelling the mechanisms driving niche shifts can shed light on the management of invasive species. Here, we assessed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa . We also predicted potential invadable areas based on an ensemble of three ecological niche modelling methods, and evaluated the performance of models calibrated with native vs. pooled (native plus invaded) species records. By disentangling the drivers of change on the exotic wild boar population's niches, we found strong evidence for niche conservatism during biological invasion. Ecological niche models calibrated with both native and pooled range records predicted convergent areas. Also, observed niche shifts are mostly explained by niche unfilling, i.e. there are unoccupied areas in the exotic range where climate is analogous to the native range. Niche unfilling is expected as result of recent colonization and ongoing dispersal, and was potentially stronger for the Neotropics, where a recent wave of introductions for pig‐farming and game‐hunting has led to high wild boar population growth rates. The invasive potential of wild boar in the Neotropics is probably higher than in other regions, which has profound management implications if we are to prevent their invasion into species‐rich areas, such as Amazonia, coupled with expansion of African swine fever and possibly great economic losses. Although the originally Eurasian‐wide distribution suggests a pre‐adaptation to a wide array of climates, the wild boar world‐wide invasion does not exhibit evidence of niche evolution. The invasive potential of the wild boar therefore probably lies on the reproductive, dietary and morphological characteristics of this species, coupled with behavioural thermoregulation. Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species' fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact that species tend to maintain their original climate niche allows predictive maps of invasion risk to anticipate potential invadable areas. Unravelling the mechanisms driving niche shifts can shed light on the management of invasive species. Here, we assessed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa. We also predicted potential invadable areas based on an ensemble of three ecological niche modelling methods, and evaluated the performance of models calibrated with native vs. pooled (native plus invaded) species records. By disentangling the drivers of change on the exotic wild boar population's niches, we found strong evidence for niche conservatism during biological invasion. Ecological niche models calibrated with both native and pooled range records predicted convergent areas. Also, observed niche shifts are mostly explained by niche unfilling, i.e. there are unoccupied areas in the exotic range where climate is analogous to the native range. Niche unfilling is expected as result of recent colonization and ongoing dispersal, and was potentially stronger for the Neotropics, where a recent wave of introductions for pig-farming and game-hunting has led to high wild boar population growth rates. The invasive potential of wild boar in the Neotropics is probably higher than in other regions, which has profound management implications if we are to prevent their invasion into species-rich areas, such as Amazonia, coupled with expansion of African swine fever and possibly great economic losses. Although the originally Eurasian-wide distribution suggests a pre-adaptation to a wide array of climates, the wild boar world-wide invasion does not exhibit evidence of niche evolution. The invasive potential of the wild boar therefore probably lies on the reproductive, dietary and morphological characteristics of this species, coupled with behavioural thermoregulation. 1. Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species' fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact that species tend to maintain their original climate niche allows predictive maps of invasion risk to anticipate potential invadable areas. Unravelling the mechanisms driving niche shifts can shed light on the management of invasive species. 2. Here, we assessed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa. We also predicted potential invadable areas based on an ensemble of three ecological niche modelling methods, and evaluated the performance of models calibrated with native vs. pooled (native plus invaded) species records. By disentangling the drivers of change on the exotic wild boar population's niches, we found strong evidence for niche conservatism during biological invasion. 3. Ecological niche models calibrated with both native and pooled range records predicted convergent areas. Also, observed niche shifts are mostly explained by niche unfilling, i.e. there are unoccupied areas in the exotic range where climate is analogous to the native range. 4. Niche unfilling is expected as result of recent colonization and ongoing dispersal, and was potentially stronger for the Neotropics, where a recent wave of introductions for pig-farming and game-hunting has led to high wild boar population growth rates. The invasive potential of wild boar in the Neotropics is probably higher than in other regions, which has profound management implications if we are to prevent their invasion into species-rich areas, such as Amazonia, coupled with expansion of African swine fever and possibly great economic losses. 5. Although the originally Eurasian-wide distribution suggests a pre-adaptation to a wide array of climates, the wild boar world-wide invasion does not exhibit evidence of niche evolution. The invasive potential of the wild boar therefore probably lies on the reproductive, dietary and morphological characteristics of this species, coupled with behavioural thermoregulation. Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species' fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact that species tend to maintain their original climate niche allows predictive maps of invasion risk to anticipate potential invadable areas. Unravelling the mechanisms driving niche shifts can shed light on the management of invasive species. Here, we assessed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa. We also predicted potential invadable areas based on an ensemble of three ecological niche modelling methods, and evaluated the performance of models calibrated with native vs. pooled (native plus invaded) species records. By disentangling the drivers of change on the exotic wild boar population's niches, we found strong evidence for niche conservatism during biological invasion. Ecological niche models calibrated with both native and pooled range records predicted convergent areas. Also, observed niche shifts are mostly explained by niche unfilling, i.e. there are unoccupied areas in the exotic range where climate is analogous to the native range. Niche unfilling is expected as result of recent colonization and ongoing dispersal, and was potentially stronger for the Neotropics, where a recent wave of introductions for pig-farming and game-hunting has led to high wild boar population growth rates. The invasive potential of wild boar in the Neotropics is probably higher than in other regions, which has profound management implications if we are to prevent their invasion into species-rich areas, such as Amazonia, coupled with expansion of African swine fever and possibly great economic losses. Although the originally Eurasian-wide distribution suggests a pre-adaptation to a wide array of climates, the wild boar world-wide invasion does not exhibit evidence of niche evolution. The invasive potential of the wild boar therefore probably lies on the reproductive, dietary and morphological characteristics of this species, coupled with behavioural thermoregulation.Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species' fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact that species tend to maintain their original climate niche allows predictive maps of invasion risk to anticipate potential invadable areas. Unravelling the mechanisms driving niche shifts can shed light on the management of invasive species. Here, we assessed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa. We also predicted potential invadable areas based on an ensemble of three ecological niche modelling methods, and evaluated the performance of models calibrated with native vs. pooled (native plus invaded) species records. By disentangling the drivers of change on the exotic wild boar population's niches, we found strong evidence for niche conservatism during biological invasion. Ecological niche models calibrated with both native and pooled range records predicted convergent areas. Also, observed niche shifts are mostly explained by niche unfilling, i.e. there are unoccupied areas in the exotic range where climate is analogous to the native range. Niche unfilling is expected as result of recent colonization and ongoing dispersal, and was potentially stronger for the Neotropics, where a recent wave of introductions for pig-farming and game-hunting has led to high wild boar population growth rates. The invasive potential of wild boar in the Neotropics is probably higher than in other regions, which has profound management implications if we are to prevent their invasion into species-rich areas, such as Amazonia, coupled with expansion of African swine fever and possibly great economic losses. Although the originally Eurasian-wide distribution suggests a pre-adaptation to a wide array of climates, the wild boar world-wide invasion does not exhibit evidence of niche evolution. The invasive potential of the wild boar therefore probably lies on the reproductive, dietary and morphological characteristics of this species, coupled with behavioural thermoregulation. |
Author | Hayward, Matt Warrington Paglia, Adriano Loyola, Rafael Passamani, Marcelo Ribeiro, Bruno R. Sales, Lilian Patrícia |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lilian Patrícia surname: Sales fullname: Sales, Lilian Patrícia – sequence: 2 givenname: Bruno R. surname: Ribeiro fullname: Ribeiro, Bruno R. – sequence: 3 givenname: Matt Warrington surname: Hayward fullname: Hayward, Matt Warrington – sequence: 4 givenname: Adriano surname: Paglia fullname: Paglia, Adriano – sequence: 5 givenname: Marcelo surname: Passamani fullname: Passamani, Marcelo – sequence: 6 givenname: Rafael surname: Loyola fullname: Loyola, Rafael |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkTtPwzAURi1URFtgZgJFYmEJ-O1kQapQeQnBArPlOI5wldrFTov497gt7dCBerF0fc617v2GoOe8MwCcIXiN0rlBhLMcc8avERYYHYDBttIDAwgxygtRwj4YxjiBEAoMyRHo4yIBguABuH21-tNk2rtowkJ1Nk4z5eqsS0XrFirahclmvjOus6rNfLN6-bZtnVVehRNw2Kg2mtO_-xh83I_f7x7zl7eHp7vRS64ZoShvkChRgREzmOCqrKmuK1IhpVglGKW6YYUgtYCN4QxXpBFQ8YaVVamMFkoIcgyu1n1nwX_NTezk1EZt2lY54-dR4jQb45gIvhdFJaKsQJTDhF7uoBM_Dy4NkiicenHEWaIu_qh5NTW1nAU7VeFHbpaYgJs1oIOPMZhmiyAolzHJZShyGYpcxZQMtmNo26Xle9cFZdt_PL72UgDmZ9838nn0Ot6I52txEjsftiJlEFMKKfkFubCrEg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_024_03389_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gecco_2021_e01807 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_023_03134_z crossref_primary_10_24057_2071_9388_2019_52 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_95927_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_024_01856_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2019_103488 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0233473 crossref_primary_10_48077_scihor_25_2__2022_65_75 crossref_primary_10_3390_biology10020154 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2017_5068 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15129497 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_019_02068_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_6891 crossref_primary_10_3390_land11060887 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_accre_2022_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_200579 crossref_primary_10_1515_mammalia_2021_0141 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42991_021_00125_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jnc_2023_126393 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_019_02100_y crossref_primary_10_3390_insects14010084 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_epidem_2022_100596 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_022_02814_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10750_024_05647_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2023_110454 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_022_02872_w crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyab100 crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyad048 crossref_primary_10_3957_056_053_0185 crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_7671 crossref_primary_10_1111_afe_12599 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0206070 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_6036 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoinf_2022_101813 crossref_primary_10_1111_ivb_12385 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_021_02528_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_wlb3_01342 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecon_2020_06_001 crossref_primary_10_2108_zs220082 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13142258 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13378 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10750_020_04412_w crossref_primary_10_1093_jmammal_gyab099 crossref_primary_10_1111_eea_13293 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_023_02700_0 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_26756_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs17010046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijfoodmicro_2019_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pecon_2019_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_3719 crossref_primary_10_3354_meps12878 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecog_04499 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_47859_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_onehlt_2023_100577 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10340_023_01627_3 crossref_primary_10_1590_1676_0611_bn_2018_0719 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x 10.23943/princeton/9780691136868.001.0001 10.1515/aoas-2015-0024 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.009 10.17161/bi.v2i0.4 10.1111/ecog.00632 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02456.x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01060.x 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06196.x 10.1079/BJN19630053 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00698.x 10.1111/geb.12050 10.1073/pnas.0901650106 10.1111/geb.12208 10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6 10.1126/science.285.5431.1265 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111155 10.1073/pnas.0901637106 10.1016/j.ncon.2015.04.005 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0254 10.1111/eva.12383 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.002 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00257.x 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001018.x 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.056 10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039 10.2307/1383024 10.1126/science.1215933 10.1007/s10164-004-0121-7 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2509:VIPPLC]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/acv.12269 10.1017/S0030605310001304 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00871.x 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00461.x 10.1111/mam.12015 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x 10.1126/science.1205106 10.1017/CBO9780511810602 10.1086/378926 10.1007/s10530-011-9963-4 10.1086/282911 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0377:ITAGSO>2.0.CO;2 10.1111/mam.12011 10.1007/s10344-006-0045-3 10.3197/096327115X14183182353827 10.1073/pnas.1405766111 10.1071/9780643090156 10.1073/pnas.1312984110 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 10.1186/s13567-014-0122-7 10.1111/ecog.02671 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x 10.1126/science.1251817 10.1111/brv.12154 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 British Ecological Society 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 British Ecological Society – notice: 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society – notice: 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society. – notice: Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2656.12721 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Animal Behavior Abstracts Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE AGRICOLA MEDLINE - Academic Entomology Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Zoology Biology |
EISSN | 1365-2656 |
EndPage | 1223 |
ExternalDocumentID | 28656732 10_1111_1365_2656_12721 JANE12721 45024404 |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Amazonia |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Amazonia |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Brazilian Network on Global Climate Change Research/CNPq funderid: 550022/2014‐7 – fundername: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico funderid: 308532/2014‐7; 479959/2013‐7; 407094/2013‐0; 56362 – fundername: Brazilian Network on Global Climate Change Research/FINEP funderid: 01.13.0353.00 – fundername: O Boticário Group Foundation for the Protection of Nature funderid: PROG_0008_2013 |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .GA 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 29J 2AX 2WC 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHKG AAHQN AAISJ AAKGQ AAMMB AAMNL AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABAWQ ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPFR ABPLY ABPQH ABPVW ABSQW ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACHIC ACHJO ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACSTJ ACUBG ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUPB AEUYR AEYWJ AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFXHP AFZJQ AGHNM AGUYK AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB AQVQM ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CBGCD CS3 CUYZI D-E D-F DCZOG DEVKO DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD EYRJQ F00 F01 F04 F5P G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HGLYW HZI HZ~ IHE IPSME IX1 J0M JAAYA JAS JBMMH JBS JBZCM JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLS JLXEF JPL JPM JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ TEORI TN5 UB1 UPT W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WIH WIK WIN WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WXSBR WYISQ XG1 YQT ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT .Y3 24P 31~ AAHHS ABTAH ABYAD ACCFJ ACKIV ACTWD ADULT ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AI. AIWBW AJBDE AS~ CAG COF DOOOF ESX FVMVE GTFYD HF~ HGD HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF JSODD MVM NHB VH1 WHG WRC ZCG ZY4 AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN 7QG 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 7X8 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5341-f17918215e232b9d4cdb3b1aa5b7544cf5873d70fe652b3f70a6f59b9aec7a773 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0021-8790 1365-2656 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:24:59 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:38:12 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:53:22 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:42:57 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:10:01 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:14 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 17:07:02 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 22:06:16 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | ecological niche models conservation biogeography invasive alien species feral pig biological invasion |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5341-f17918215e232b9d4cdb3b1aa5b7544cf5873d70fe652b3f70a6f59b9aec7a773 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1159-6412 |
OpenAccessLink | https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1365-2656.12721 |
PMID | 28656732 |
PQID | 1927636165 |
PQPubID | 37522 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2000562376 proquest_miscellaneous_1914581460 proquest_journals_1927636165 pubmed_primary_28656732 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_12721 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_1365_2656_12721 wiley_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_12721_JANE12721 jstor_primary_45024404 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | September 2017 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2017 text: September 2017 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of animal ecology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Anim Ecol |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons Ltd – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
References | 2017; 40 2012; 286 2015; 38 2013; 22 1999; 285 1974; 108 2011; 13 2014; 29 2008; 4 2012; 14 2014; 23 2005; 23 1936; 2 2005; 69 2000 2006; 21 2015; 90 2012; 335 2008; 62 2012; 21 2005; 36 2015; 13 2015; 15 2011; 333 2006; 52 2016; 19 2011 2006; 15 2009 2008 2003 2007; 10 2014; 111 2011; 38 2014; 45 2014; 44 2009; 258 2011; 132 2003; 78 2016; 4 1957; 22 2015; 24 2009; 32 2006; 43 2004; 58 2015; 22 2005; 52 2000; 81 2017 2016 2011; 45 2005; 2 2011; 222 2014; 345 1963; 17 2005; 11 2016; 9 2009; 106 1998; 79 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_47_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_49_1 Sales L. P. (e_1_2_8_52_1) 2017 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_43_1 e_1_2_8_66_1 R Core Team (e_1_2_8_50_1) 2016 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_45_1 e_1_2_8_64_1 e_1_2_8_62_1 e_1_2_8_41_1 e_1_2_8_60_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_59_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_38_1 e_1_2_8_57_1 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_55_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_53_1 Skewes O. (e_1_2_8_56_1) 2015; 22 e_1_2_8_51_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_46_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_48_1 Mahalanobis P. C. (e_1_2_8_36_1) 1936; 2 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_42_1 e_1_2_8_67_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_44_1 e_1_2_8_65_1 e_1_2_8_63_1 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_61_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_37_1 e_1_2_8_58_1 Hijmans R. J. (e_1_2_8_30_1) 2011 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 e_1_2_8_54_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 44 start-page: 124 year: 2014 end-page: 134 article-title: A review of wild boar diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges publication-title: Mammal Review – year: 2011 – volume: 69 start-page: 377 year: 2005 end-page: 384 article-title: Illegal translocation and genetic structure of feral pigs in Western Australia publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – year: 2009 – volume: 111 start-page: 10233 year: 2014 end-page: 10238 article-title: Realized niche shift during a global biological invasion publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America – volume: 4 start-page: 61 year: 2016 end-page: 85 article-title: The Evolution of Suidae publication-title: Annual Review of Animal Biosciences – volume: 345 start-page: 401 year: 2014 end-page: 406 article-title: Defaunation in the Anthropocene publication-title: Science – volume: 132 start-page: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 13 article-title: Review of wallowing in pigs: Description of the behaviour and its motivational basis publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science – volume: 13 start-page: 2785 year: 2011 end-page: 2797 article-title: Use of niche models in invasive species risk assessments publication-title: Biological Invasions – volume: 15 start-page: 601 year: 2015 end-page: 610 article-title: Pig behaviour in relation to weather conditions – A review publication-title: Annals of Animal Science – volume: 13 start-page: 84 year: 2015 end-page: 87 article-title: Current distribution of invasive feral pigs in Brazil: Economic impacts and ecological uncertainty publication-title: Natureza & Conservação – year: 2017 article-title: Data from: Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar publication-title: Dryad Digital Repository – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2005 end-page: 10 article-title: Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas publication-title: Biodiversity Informatics – volume: 44 start-page: 135 year: 2014 end-page: 147 article-title: Impacts and management of wild pigs in Australia publication-title: Mammal Review – volume: 24 start-page: 79 year: 2015 end-page: 104 article-title: Contesting death: Conservation, heritage and pig killing in far North Queensland, Australia publication-title: Environmental Values – volume: 222 start-page: 1810 year: 2011 end-page: 1819 article-title: The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling publication-title: Ecological Modelling – volume: 258 start-page: 546 year: 2009 end-page: 553 article-title: Experimental test of the impacts of feral hogs on forest dynamics and processes in the southeastern US publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 106 start-page: 19644 year: 2009 end-page: 19650 article-title: Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptions publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America – volume: 22 start-page: 113 year: 2015 end-page: 124 article-title: History of the introduction and present distribution of the European wild boar ( ) in Chile publication-title: Mastozoología Neotropical – volume: 43 start-page: 1223 year: 2006 end-page: 1232 article-title: Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 38 start-page: 321 year: 2015 end-page: 329 article-title: Niche conservatism among non‐native vertebrates in Europe and North America publication-title: Ecography – volume: 45 start-page: 78 year: 2011 end-page: 83 article-title: Invasive species and bushmeat hunting contributing to wildlife conservation: The case of feral pigs in a Neotropical wetland publication-title: Oryx – volume: 9 start-page: 769 year: 2016 end-page: 776 article-title: Unexpected but welcome. Artificially selected traits may increase fitness in wild boar publication-title: Evolutionary Applications – volume: 11 start-page: 2234 year: 2005 end-page: 2250 article-title: Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale publication-title: Global Change Biology – year: 2008 – volume: 21 start-page: 481 year: 2012 end-page: 497 article-title: Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data publication-title: Global Ecology and Biogeography – volume: 81 start-page: 2509 year: 2000 end-page: 2524 article-title: Variation in peccary populations: Landscape composition or competition by an invader? publication-title: Ecology – volume: 62 start-page: 2868 year: 2008 end-page: 2883 article-title: Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution publication-title: Evolution – volume: 45 start-page: 122 year: 2014 article-title: Spatiotemporal interactions between wild boar and cattle: Implications for cross‐species disease transmission publication-title: Veterinary Research – volume: 4 start-page: 585 year: 2008 end-page: 589 article-title: Predicting current and future biological invasions: Both native and invaded ranges matter publication-title: Biology Letters – volume: 78 start-page: 419 year: 2003 end-page: 433 article-title: Predicting the geography of species’ invasions via ecological niche modeling publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Biology – volume: 286 start-page: 221 year: 2012 end-page: 231 article-title: Prey preferences of the tiger publication-title: Journal of Zoology – volume: 52 start-page: 273 year: 2005 end-page: 288 article-title: Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien‐invasive species in the United States publication-title: Ecological Economics – volume: 21 start-page: 71 year: 2006 end-page: 76 article-title: The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation publication-title: Trends in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 10 start-page: 1115 year: 2007 end-page: 1123 article-title: Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and grographic distribution of species publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 14 start-page: 2283 year: 2012 end-page: 2300 article-title: Impact of wild boar ( ) in its introduced and native range: A review publication-title: Biological Invasions – volume: 36 start-page: 519 year: 2005 end-page: 539 article-title: Niche conservatism: Integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics – volume: 38 start-page: 817 year: 2011 end-page: 827 article-title: Ecological niche conservatism: A time‐structured review of evidence publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 23 start-page: 9 year: 2005 end-page: 14 article-title: The sexual function of wallowing in male wild boar ( ) publication-title: Journal of Ethology – volume: 285 start-page: 1265 year: 1999 end-page: 1267 article-title: Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time publication-title: Science – year: 2003 – volume: 10 start-page: 701 year: 2007 end-page: 709 article-title: Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 29 start-page: 260 year: 2014 end-page: 269 article-title: Unifying niche shift studies: Insights from biological invasions publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – volume: 2 start-page: 49 year: 1936 end-page: 55 article-title: On the generalized distance in statistics publication-title: Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India – year: 2000 – volume: 58 start-page: 1781 year: 2004 end-page: 1793 article-title: Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs publication-title: Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution – volume: 22 start-page: 415 year: 1957 end-page: 427 article-title: Concluding remarks publication-title: Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology – volume: 19 start-page: 490 year: 2016 end-page: 497 article-title: Could biodiversity loss have increased Australia's bushfire threat? publication-title: Animal Conservation – year: 2016 – volume: 17 start-page: 495 year: 1963 end-page: 513 article-title: Changes in the chemical composition of sow‐reared piglets during the first month of life publication-title: British Journal of Nutrition – start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 29 – volume: 108 start-page: 332 year: 1974 end-page: 340 article-title: Some methods for calculating competition coefficients from resource‐utilization spectra publication-title: The American Naturalist – volume: 52 start-page: 245 year: 2006 end-page: 250 article-title: Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem publication-title: European Journal of Wildlife Research – volume: 335 start-page: 1344 year: 2012 end-page: 1348 article-title: Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders publication-title: Science – volume: 333 start-page: 301 year: 2011 end-page: 306 article-title: Trophic downgrading of planet earth publication-title: Science – volume: 90 start-page: 1248 year: 2015 end-page: 1262 article-title: Phylogenetic niche conservatism and the evolutionary basis of ecological speciation publication-title: Biological Reviews – volume: 79 start-page: 1325 year: 1998 end-page: 1331 article-title: Reproduction of feral pigs in Southern Texas publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 23 start-page: 1356 year: 2014 end-page: 1365 article-title: Climatic niche shifts between species’ native and naturalized ranges raise concern for ecological forecasts during invasions and climate change publication-title: Global Ecology and Biogeography – volume: 40 start-page: 774 year: 2017 end-page: 787 article-title: Ecospat: An R package to support spatial analyses and modeling of species niches and distributions publication-title: Ecography – volume: 22 start-page: 962 year: 2013 end-page: 970 article-title: Niche conservatism in non‐native birds in Europe: Niche unfilling rather than niche expansion publication-title: Global Ecology and Biogeography – volume: 15 start-page: 578 year: 2006 end-page: 587 article-title: A comparison of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness publication-title: Global Ecology and Biogeography – volume: 111 start-page: 6153 year: 2014 end-page: 6158 article-title: Evaluating the roles of directed breeding and gene flow in animal domestication publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America – volume: 32 start-page: 897 year: 2009 end-page: 906 article-title: Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change publication-title: Ecography – volume: 106 start-page: 19651 year: 2009 end-page: 19658 article-title: Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America – ident: e_1_2_8_66_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x – ident: e_1_2_8_46_1 doi: 10.23943/princeton/9780691136868.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 doi: 10.1515/aoas-2015-0024 – volume: 22 start-page: 113 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_8_56_1 article-title: History of the introduction and present distribution of the European wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Chile publication-title: Mastozoología Neotropical – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.009 – ident: e_1_2_8_54_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_59_1 doi: 10.17161/bi.v2i0.4 – ident: e_1_2_8_61_1 doi: 10.1111/ecog.00632 – ident: e_1_2_8_45_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02456.x – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01060.x – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06196.x – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1079/BJN19630053 – ident: e_1_2_8_51_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00698.x – ident: e_1_2_8_62_1 doi: 10.1111/geb.12050 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901650106 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1111/geb.12208 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6 – ident: e_1_2_8_43_1 doi: 10.1126/science.285.5431.1265 – ident: e_1_2_8_67_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111155 – ident: e_1_2_8_58_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901637106 – ident: e_1_2_8_42_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ncon.2015.04.005 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0254 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1111/eva.12383 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.002 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00257.x – ident: e_1_2_8_64_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001018.x – ident: e_1_2_8_55_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.056 – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039 – volume: 2 start-page: 49 year: 1936 ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 article-title: On the generalized distance in statistics publication-title: Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India – ident: e_1_2_8_63_1 doi: 10.2307/1383024 – ident: e_1_2_8_47_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1215933 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1007/s10164-004-0121-7 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2509:VIPPLC]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1111/acv.12269 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1017/S0030605310001304 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00871.x – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00461.x – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 – year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_8_52_1 article-title: Data from: Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar publication-title: Dryad Digital Repository – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1111/mam.12015 – ident: e_1_2_8_57_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1205106 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810602 – ident: e_1_2_8_44_1 doi: 10.1086/378926 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-011-9963-4 – ident: e_1_2_8_53_1 doi: 10.1086/282911 – ident: e_1_2_8_60_1 doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0377:ITAGSO>2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1111/mam.12011 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1007/s10344-006-0045-3 – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.3197/096327115X14183182353827 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_65_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405766111 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1071/9780643090156 – volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_8_50_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312984110 – ident: e_1_2_8_48_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 – volume-title: Package ‘dismo’ year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1186/s13567-014-0122-7 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1111/ecog.02671 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1251817 – ident: e_1_2_8_49_1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12154 |
SSID | ssj0007203 |
Score | 2.4788542 |
Snippet | 1. Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species' fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The... Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species’ fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact... Niche conservatism, i.e. the retention of a species' fundamental niche through evolutionary time, is cornerstone for biological invasion assessments. The fact... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley jstor |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1214 |
SubjectTerms | African swine fever Amazonia Animal Distribution Animal models Animals Biological evolution biological invasion Body Temperature Regulation Climate Climate Change Colonization conservation biogeography Diet Dispersal ecological invasion ecological niche models Economic impact Ecosystem evolution Farming feral pig Fever financial economics Growth rate Hunting Indigenous species Introduced Species invasive alien species Invasive species livestock production Macroecology Neotropics Niches Nonnative species Physical characteristics Population growth Reproduction risk Sus scrofa Swine Thermoregulation Wave dispersion wild boars |
Title | Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/45024404 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2F1365-2656.12721 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656732 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1927636165 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1914581460 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000562376 |
Volume | 86 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8QwFH6IIHhxX-pGBQ9eOrbNNr0IIooIzkEUxEvJVhC1HZwZQX-9eenigiLiLTQvIct7ydfkey8Ae0ykXBuiI0KMiWhBaNRPExrZfhYTRomSFm90Lwb87Jqe37CWTYi-MHV8iO7ADS3Dr9do4FKNPhh5w89ivJekwruS4xeERZfvAaTwkrEmeSTO7rO4Ce6DXJ4v5T_tSzU18TvQ-RnD-k3odB5U2_yae3Lfm4xVT79-iez4r_4twFwDUcOjWqcWYcqWSzBTP1r54lK3lU8tw-EAeaShRkK2P9odPYayNKHDlOFd-SyRGR8OqzESklyFVeFzXGtMqCr5tALXpydXx2dR8x5DpJnb7KICQ5m6mWTWwTCVGaqNIiqRkikMo6cL1hfEiLiwnKWKFCKWvGCZyqTVQgpBVmG6rEq7DiGNiTS0yFyFhtqMOWmnFBZfTTJYVQC9djZy3QQrxzczHvL2pwWHJ8fhyf3wBLDfFRjWcTp-Fl3109vJUeaACo1pAFvtfOeNJY9yh4DdEswTzgLY7bKdDeLFiixtNUGZhDI8S41_lkGXKMSaggewVutS1wD0DuaCpAEceI34rQf5-dHgxKc2_lxiE2ZTRCaeJrcF0-Onid12uGqsdrzpvAEw9RDl |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1La9tAEB6KQ0kuTR9xqyRtVeghFzmS9mVdAqE4uK7jQ3HA9CL2JShtpZDIhfbXZ2clq46pKSW3hZ1d9jW7385-OwPwnomUa0N0RIgxES0IjYZpQiM7zGLCKFHS4ovu5YyPr-hkwRZrf2Ea_xCdwQ01w-_XqOBokF7T8pagxfggSQX-Jd_BuN7-WvX5jwspfGZsaB6J0_wsbt37IJtno4J7J1NDTvwb7LyPYv0xdLEPetWBhn3ybbCs1UD_3vDt-LAePoUnLUoNz5tl9Qwe2fI5PG7iVv5yqS-VT72AsxlSSUONnGxv3b39EcrShA5Whl_LnxLJ8eF1VSMnyVVYFT7HNceEqpI3B3B1MZp_GEdtSIZIM3feRQV6M3WTyaxDYiozVBtFVCIlU-hJTxdsKIgRcWE5SxUpRCx5wTKVSauFFIL0oVdWpX0FIY2JNLTIXIWG2ow5abcuLAZOMlhVAIPVdOS69VeOYTO-56t7Cw5PjsOT--EJ4KQrcN246tgu2vfz28lR5rAKjWkAx6sJz1tlvs0dCHa7ME84C-Bdl-3UEN9WZGmrJcoklKE5Nd4ug7-iEG4KHsDLZjF1DcAPwlyQNIBTvyT-1YN8cj4b-dThf5d4C7vj-eU0n36cfTqCvRSBimfNHUOvvlna1w5m1eqN16M7U8AVAA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dSxwxEB-KUvHFWq26rbZb8KEve93dfN2-FEQ9rLaHiELpy5JPkNbdQ-8E_evNZD-qUinFt0AmQzaZSX6b_GYCsM1EzrUhOiHEmIQ6QpNhntHEDouUMEqUtHij-33MD87o4Q_WsQkxFqbJD9EfuKFnhPUaHXxi3D0nb_lZjA-yXGAo-Tzl6RANe-_kTwYpvGVsWB6Zd_wibbP7IJnnkYIHG1PDTfwb6nwIYsMuNHoFqut_Qz75NZhN1UDfPkrt-KwPXIalFqPGO41RvYYXtlqBl82rlTe-9LMOpVX4MkYiaayRkR3Odq8uYlmZ2IPK-Ly6lkiNjyf1FBlJXmHtQo3vjYlVLS_fwNlo_3T3IGkfZEg087td4jCXqZ9KZj0OU4Wh2iiiMimZwjx62rGhIEakznKWK-JEKrljhSqk1UIKQdZgrqoruwExTYk01BVeoaG2YF7aW4XFZ5MMqopg0M1Gqdts5fhoxu-y-2vB4SlxeMowPBF86htMmkQdT4uuhent5SjzSIWmNILNbr7L1pWvSg-B_RrMM84i-NhXeyfEmxVZ2XqGMhlleJiaPi2DMVEINgWPYL2xpb4DGB7MBckj-Bws4l9fUB7ujPdD6e1_t_gAC8d7o_Lb1_HRO1jMEaUEytwmzE0vZ3bLY6ypeh-86A4GyhO4 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Niche+conservatism+and+the+invasive+potential+of+the+wild+boar&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+animal+ecology&rft.au=Sales%2C+Lilian+Patr%C3%ADcia&rft.au=Ribeiro%2C+Bruno+R.&rft.au=Hayward%2C+Matt+Warrington&rft.au=Paglia%2C+Adriano&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1214&rft.epage=1223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2F1365-2656.12721&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252F1365-2656.12721&rft.externalDocID=JANE12721 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |