An imaging anatomical study on percutaneous vertebral augmentation for thoracic spine via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach
Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 414 - 13 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
24.04.2025
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1749-799X 1749-799X |
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-025-05824-x |
Cover
Abstract | Background
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database.
Methods
PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A
max
), the middle PIA (A
mid
), the minimum PIA (A
min
), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared.
Results
The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A
mid
ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (
p
< 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (
p
< 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusion
In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database.BACKGROUNDPercutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database.PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (Amax), the middle PIA (Amid), the minimum PIA (Amin), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared.METHODSPVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (Amax), the middle PIA (Amid), the minimum PIA (Amin), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared.The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the Amid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001).RESULTSThe mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the Amid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001).In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.CONCLUSIONIn PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A.sub.max), the middle PIA (A.sub.mid), the minimum PIA (A.sub.min), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A.sub.mid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001). In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer. Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. Methods PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A.sub.max), the middle PIA (A.sub.mid), the minimum PIA (A.sub.min), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. Results The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A.sub.mid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001). Conclusion In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer. Keywords: Percutaneous vertebral augmentation, Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, Thoracic spine, Unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach Abstract Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. Methods PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (Amax), the middle PIA (Amid), the minimum PIA (Amin), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. Results The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the Amid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001). Conclusion In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer. Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. Methods PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A max ), the middle PIA (A mid ), the minimum PIA (A min ), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. Results The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A mid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right ( p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left ( p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women ( p < 0.001). Conclusion In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A ), the middle PIA (A ), the minimum PIA (A ), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001). In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer. |
ArticleNumber | 414 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Xu, Zhendong Zhou, Linfeng Yin, Shi Du, Ying Zou, Junxin Zeng, Zezhong Jia, Zhiwei Zhang, Yan Zhang, Meilin Zeng, Fangjun |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Shi surname: Yin fullname: Yin, Shi organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine – sequence: 2 givenname: Yan surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Yan organization: Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University – sequence: 3 givenname: Ying surname: Du fullname: Du, Ying organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine – sequence: 4 givenname: Junxin surname: Zou fullname: Zou, Junxin organization: Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University – sequence: 5 givenname: Linfeng surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Linfeng organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine – sequence: 6 givenname: Meilin surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Meilin organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine – sequence: 7 givenname: Zezhong surname: Zeng fullname: Zeng, Zezhong organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine – sequence: 8 givenname: Zhiwei surname: Jia fullname: Jia, Zhiwei email: jiazhiweivip@163.com organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine – sequence: 9 givenname: Zhendong surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Zhendong email: 18842810315@163.com organization: Department of Sports Medicine, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology – sequence: 10 givenname: Fangjun surname: Zeng fullname: Zeng, Fangjun email: zengfangjun770207@126.com organization: Department of Spine Surgery, Ganzhou People’s Hospital |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40275271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1JaX7aF-iiGLrpxqkk2yN7VYbQn0Cgmxa6E9fStUeDR3IleUjeIQ_dO3EaMlCKFhJX3zlcXZ3z7MR5h1n2lrNLzpvVx8hLxpuCibpgdSOq4vZFdsZl1RaybX-dPDufZucxbhmriateZacVE7IWkp9l92uX2x0M1g05OEh-ZzWMeUyzucu9yycMek7g0M8x32NI2AW6h3nYoUuQLDG9D3na-ADa6jxO1mG-t0AlzGdnR0h4kKQALpJDxHwKXmOMxYTG6hFzmKgCevM6e9nDGPHN436R_fzy-cfVt-Lm-9frq_VNoeuyTAXIzrSrEjrkspaixx5KkFKDaWSFq67tdW3aCmsQIErdsI7zzjRt0zFusO7Li-x68TUetmoKNIBwpzxY9VDwYVAQ0qE1BSuEFppVZwxUTVd1RhjT1xpayXmlO_L6tHhNc7dDo2kq9Noj0-MbZzdq8HvFBROMC04OHx4dgv89Y0xqZ6PGcVymrkreVqtaVKwl9P2CDkC9Wdd7stQHXK2bkjqSUgqiLv9B0TJIv0sZ6i3VjwTvnr_hqfm_MSFALIAOPsaA_RPCmTpkUS1ZVJRF9ZBFdUuichFFgt2AQW39HBx97P9UfwCd8ecS |
Cites_doi | 10.1148/radiol.2223010718 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.029 10.1097/md.0000000000006738 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c750b 10.1186/s12891-019-2602-4 10.1055/a-1785-5698 10.1080/10790268.2018.1451238 10.1097/brs.0000000000000493 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004 10.3171/2012.8.spine111003 10.36076/ppj/2019.22.E91 10.1186/s13018-020-01875-4 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60010-6 10.1016/j.archger.2014.05.004 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.017 10.1186/s12891-015-0619-x 10.1038/s41598-020-73513-2 10.1097/brs.0000000000000243 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000546 10.1007/s00586-005-0943-1 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92272 10.3340/jkns.2007.42.5.363 10.1097/md.0000000000007328 10.1007/s00234-020-02495-9 10.1007/s00198-003-1412-5 10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6 10.1007/s11604-005-1542-0 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.143 10.7860/jcdr/2017/25886.10461 10.1016/j.afos.2017.06.002 10.36076/ppj.2017.1.E13 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.112 10.1007/s00198-015-3430-5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2025 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2025 – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-025-05824-x |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Open Access url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1749-799X |
EndPage | 13 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_a6ea9a86bdda48b4bd2ddf5ca97114cb PMC12020121 A837117772 40275271 10_1186_s13018_025_05824_x |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: General project of key research and development plan of Ganzhou science and technology bureau grantid: 2022- -YB1384 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29L 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPT ITC KQ8 M1P M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M AAYXX CITATION ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-a7bd963abe17572fefa3a77cad874e6b9fc5d94e5a2a23c80b11bd898b01de5f3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1749-799X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:25:50 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:26:55 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 17:24:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:59:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:58:12 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:45:20 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 10 04:40:58 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:23:38 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach Percutaneous vertebral augmentation Thoracic spine |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c533t-a7bd963abe17572fefa3a77cad874e6b9fc5d94e5a2a23c80b11bd898b01de5f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/a6ea9a86bdda48b4bd2ddf5ca97114cb |
PMID | 40275271 |
PQID | 3194652409 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6ea9a86bdda48b4bd2ddf5ca97114cb pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12020121 proquest_miscellaneous_3194652409 gale_infotracmisc_A837117772 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A837117772 pubmed_primary_40275271 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_025_05824_x springer_journals_10_1186_s13018_025_05824_x |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-04-24 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-04-24 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2025 text: 2025-04-24 day: 24 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | J Orthop Surg Res |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Orthop Surg Res |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
References | K Kobayashi (5824_CR23) 2006; 24 L Yuan (5824_CR12) 2020; 15 MX Liu (5824_CR8) 2020; 43 H Sun (5824_CR19) 2016; 19 W Chang (5824_CR3) 2017; 96 X Chen (5824_CR4) 2018; 21 L Yan (5824_CR11) 2016; 27 AC Dufresne (5824_CR34) 1998; 25 AK Kim (5824_CR14) 2002; 222 S Zhao (5824_CR18) 2017; 96 JH Lee (5824_CR13) 2017; 3 DM Kado (5824_CR25) 2003; 14 E Truumees (5824_CR21) 2004; 4 AG Tohmeh (5824_CR24) 1999; 24 J Liu (5824_CR30) 2020; 10 H Li (5824_CR37) 2015; 16 H Wang (5824_CR26) 2014; 59 S Zhu (5824_CR1) 2020; 62 H Wang (5824_CR7) 2019; 22 W Chen (5824_CR10) 2019; 122 H Zhang (5824_CR17) 2017; 20 S Wang (5824_CR6) 2014; 39 BM Boszczyk (5824_CR22) 2005; 14 L Wang (5824_CR29) 2023; 161 DF Kallmes (5824_CR32) 2002; 23 P Yin (5824_CR9) 2019; 59 D Wardlaw (5824_CR15) 2009; 373 MS Masoudi (5824_CR16) 2017; 30 HS Kim (5824_CR33) 2007; 42 J Liu (5824_CR35) 2010; 35 Y Chevalier (5824_CR31) 2008; 33 HH Lin (5824_CR36) 2019; 20 RL Cazzato (5824_CR2) 2021; 31 A Karmakar (5824_CR28) 2017; 11 H Wang (5824_CR27) 2012; 17 L Yan (5824_CR5) 2014; 39 R Schupfner (5824_CR20) 2021; 52 |
References_xml | – volume: 222 start-page: 737 year: 2002 ident: 5824_CR14 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2223010718 – volume: 4 start-page: 218 year: 2004 ident: 5824_CR21 publication-title: Spine Journal: Official J North Am Spine Soc doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.029 – volume: 96 start-page: e6738 year: 2017 ident: 5824_CR3 publication-title: Medicine doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000006738 – volume: 33 start-page: 1722 year: 2008 ident: 5824_CR31 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c750b – volume: 20 start-page: 252 year: 2019 ident: 5824_CR36 publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2602-4 – volume: 161 start-page: 660 year: 2023 ident: 5824_CR29 publication-title: Z Orthop Unfall doi: 10.1055/a-1785-5698 – volume: 43 start-page: 201 year: 2020 ident: 5824_CR8 publication-title: J Spinal Cord Med doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1451238 – volume: 25 start-page: 123 year: 1998 ident: 5824_CR34 publication-title: J Neuroradiol – volume: 39 start-page: B19 year: 2014 ident: 5824_CR5 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000493 – volume: 24 start-page: 1772 year: 1999 ident: 5824_CR24 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004 – volume: 17 start-page: 459 year: 2012 ident: 5824_CR27 publication-title: J Neurosurg Spine doi: 10.3171/2012.8.spine111003 – volume: 23 start-page: 1117 year: 2002 ident: 5824_CR32 publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol – volume: 22 start-page: E91 year: 2019 ident: 5824_CR7 publication-title: Pain Physician doi: 10.36076/ppj/2019.22.E91 – volume: 15 start-page: 359 year: 2020 ident: 5824_CR12 publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01875-4 – volume: 373 start-page: 1016 year: 2009 ident: 5824_CR15 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60010-6 – volume: 59 start-page: 657 year: 2014 ident: 5824_CR26 publication-title: Arch Gerontol Geriatr doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.05.004 – volume: 52 start-page: S63 issue: Suppl 5 year: 2021 ident: 5824_CR20 publication-title: Injury doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.017 – volume: 16 start-page: 162 year: 2015 ident: 5824_CR37 publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0619-x – volume: 10 start-page: 16320 year: 2020 ident: 5824_CR30 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73513-2 – volume: 39 start-page: 701 year: 2014 ident: 5824_CR6 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000243 – volume: 30 start-page: E1066 year: 2017 ident: 5824_CR16 publication-title: Clin Spine Surg doi: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000546 – volume: 14 start-page: 992 year: 2005 ident: 5824_CR22 publication-title: Spine Res Soc doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0943-1 – volume: 35 start-page: E1373 year: 2010 ident: 5824_CR35 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92272 – volume: 42 start-page: 363 year: 2007 ident: 5824_CR33 publication-title: J Korean Neurosurg Soc doi: 10.3340/jkns.2007.42.5.363 – volume: 96 start-page: e7328 year: 2017 ident: 5824_CR18 publication-title: Medicine doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000007328 – volume: 19 start-page: 551 year: 2016 ident: 5824_CR19 publication-title: Pain Physician – volume: 62 start-page: 1353 year: 2020 ident: 5824_CR1 publication-title: Neuroradiology doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02495-9 – volume: 14 start-page: 589 year: 2003 ident: 5824_CR25 publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1412-5 – volume: 21 start-page: 327 year: 2018 ident: 5824_CR4 publication-title: Pain Physician – volume: 31 start-page: 591 year: 2021 ident: 5824_CR2 publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6 – volume: 24 start-page: 187 year: 2006 ident: 5824_CR23 publication-title: Radiat Med doi: 10.1007/s11604-005-1542-0 – volume: 122 start-page: 342 year: 2019 ident: 5824_CR10 publication-title: World Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.143 – volume: 11 start-page: Rc07 year: 2017 ident: 5824_CR28 publication-title: J Clin Diagn Research: JCDR doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/25886.10461 – volume: 3 start-page: 82 year: 2017 ident: 5824_CR13 publication-title: Osteoporos Sarcopenia doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2017.06.002 – volume: 20 start-page: E13 year: 2017 ident: 5824_CR17 publication-title: Pain Physician doi: 10.36076/ppj.2017.1.E13 – volume: 59 start-page: 146 year: 2019 ident: 5824_CR9 publication-title: J Clin Neurosci doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.112 – volume: 27 start-page: 1849 year: 2016 ident: 5824_CR11 publication-title: Osteoporos Int doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3430-5 |
SSID | ssj0050584 |
Score | 2.3535023 |
Snippet | Background
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful... Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic... Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful... Abstract Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 414 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Aged, 80 and over CT imaging Diagnostic imaging Female Fractures, Compression - diagnostic imaging Fractures, Compression - surgery Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Middle Aged Orthopedics Osteoporosis Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging Osteoporotic Fractures - surgery Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous vertebral augmentation Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging Spinal Fractures - surgery Surgical Orthopedics Thoracic spine Thoracic Vertebrae - anatomy & histology Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach Vertebroplasty - methods |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9UwFA8yQXwRv61OiSD4oMEmTdL08TocQ9AnB3sLJx91hbuu7N4r_hH7o3eStmOdIvjapCXN-fodTs4vhLzzsXTRlI5x4xomW6cZgG6YlyIEBaXjkA_IftdHx_LriTqZaHJSL8zN-j03-tMGfSw3LF26WiojJEO8eFfxSufCrD6YvS4GciPnppi_vrcIPJmf_08vfCMM3T4ieatOmsPP4UPyYMKNdDUK-hG5E_vH5N63qTL-hFyuetqd5SuHKPSYSWcaAJrZY-l5T4d44XcIBCNm-jTdwZwKxmsKu59nU_dRTxG_0u0p6oTvPN0M-F36qwN8FOmu79aQmpXXdJuiWzrMEekwdhmwIS1jHelMUP6UHB9--XFwxKabFphHuLdlULuAlgguIpqoRRtbqKCuPQRTy6hd03oVGhkVCBCVR9ly7oJpjCt5iKqtnpG9_ryPLwhtpPYIOmLQ2kvpFTiuWvygqkC0deAF-TCLwQ4joYbNiYjRdhSaRaHZLDT7uyCfk6SuZyYy7PwAdcROtmVBR2jAaBcCSOOkC6hnrfLQ1JjteVeQ90nONpks7pGHqfMAF5zIr-wKk_RUu65FQfYXM9HU_GL47awpNg2l82lZbhYdmdQK0VFTkOej5lyvWabKsKjxz81CpxY_tRzpu9PM9M0Fonku8NWPs_rZycds_rFrL_9v-ityX2RDkUzIfbK3vdjF1wi1tu5NtrErRYsoVA priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | An imaging anatomical study on percutaneous vertebral augmentation for thoracic spine via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-025-05824-x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40275271 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3194652409 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12020121 https://doaj.org/article/a6ea9a86bdda48b4bd2ddf5ca97114cb |
Volume | 20 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3La9swGBdbd9llbOzlrQsaDHbYRG1FluRjGlpKDmVsK-QmPj28BlI3NM7oH9E_up9ku9QdbJedApJj5O_5E9-LkE8u5Dbo3LJC24qJ2koGICvmBPe-hNwWkBJkT-XJmVgsy-W9UV8xJ6xrD9wR7gBkgAq0tN6D0FZYjy-pSweVQijvbLS-eZUPl6nOBqNb12IokdHyYIuWutAsjm7FHS7Y9cgNpW79f9rke07pYcLkg6hpckbHz8mzHkXSWXf6F-RRaF6Sm1lDVxdp6hCFBi_TqRMATQ1k6WVDN-HK7RALBrzs0ziGOcaM1xR2vy76AqSGIoSl7TmKhVs5ut0gBKW_V4BLge6a1RpivfKattHBxXyOQDddoQHbxIDPOtChR_krcnZ89HN-wvphC8wh4msZKOtRGcEGBBSK16GGKSjlwGslgrRV7UpfiVACBz51yN6isF5X2uaFD2U9fU32mssmvCW0EtIh7gheSieEK8EWZY0vLKfAa-WLjHwZaG82XU8Nk-4iWpqOUwY5ZRKnzHVGDiN77p6M_bDTAkqJ6aXE_EtKMvI5MtdErUUaOeiLD_DAsf-VmeE9PYavFc_I_uhJ1DY32v44iIeJWzFFLfHNoC0TskSAVGXkTScud2cWMTjMFX65HgnS6KPGO83qPDX7LjgC-oLjX78OMmd6M7P9C9Xe_Q-qvSdPedIZwbjYJ3vt1S58QAzW2gl5rJZqQp7MZosfC_w9PDr99h1X53I-Sap4C_oBO3M |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxQxFA6yBfVFvHe1agTBBw3OZJNM5nEVy7q2fbGFvoWTy7QL29lhL-KP8Ed7kpkpThXB1yQzJDm373AuIeSNC5kNOrMs17ZkorKKAaiSOcG9l5DZHFKC7ImanYn5uTzvisI2fbZ7H5JMmjqJtVYfNqhtc83i86uZ1FwwRI57GtGIGJG96XT-bd5rYDTqWvQFMn_9cmCEUq_-PzXybybpZrrkjZhpMkWH98m9DkPSaUv0B-RWqB-S28ddlPwR-Tmt6eIqPT9EoUavOrUEoKmTLF3VtAlrt0NQGNDrp_E95hg8XlLYXVx1lUg1RSxLt5fIH27h6KbB_9LvC8ChQHf1YgmxcHlJt9HSxcSOQJu24oA1cRvLQPtm5Y_J2eHn008z1r26wBxCvy2DwnqUSrABkUXBq1DBBIrCgdeFCMqWlZO-FEECBz5xSOc8t16X2ma5D7KaPCGjelWHfUJLoRwCkOCVckI4CTaXFf5QToBXhc_H5F1PBtO0zTVMckq0Mi3RDBLNJKKZH2PyMVLqemVsjJ0GVusL08mZARWgBK2s9yC0FdYjz1XSQVmg5-fsmLyNdDZRfPGOHHRVCLjh2AjLTNFhj3Hsgo_JwWAlip0bTL_uOcXEqZirluhmUKkJJREplWPytOWc6z2LGCXmBZ5cD3hqcKjhTL24TF2_c47IPuf46fue_Uynbzb_uLVn_7f8FbkzOz0-MkdfTr4-J3d5EhrBuDggo-16F14gBNval53E_QLL4jCy |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxQxFA5Sofgi3h2tGkHwQUN3skkm87hWl3orPljoWzi5TLuwnR12Z6U_oj_ak8xM6VQRfE0yQ5Jz-w7nEkLeuDCxQU8sy7UtmaisYgCqZE5w7yVMbA4pQfZIHR6LLyfy5FoVf8p2H0KSXU1D7NJUt_uNrzoR12p_g5o31yw-xTqRmguGKPK2iKYvhmvVwaCL0bxrMZTK_PW7kTlKXfv_1M3XjNPNxMkb0dNklOb3yN0eTdJZR_775FaoH5Dd7328_CG5nNV0cZ4eIqJQo3-dmgPQ1FOWrmrahLXbIjwM6P_T-DJzDCMvKWxPz_uapJoiqqXtGXKKWzi6afC_9NcCcCjQbb1YQixhXtI22ryY4hFo09UesCZuYxno0Lb8ETmef_p5cMj69xeYQxDYMiisR_kEGxBjFLwKFUyhKBx4XYigbFk56UsRJHDgU4cUz3PrdantJPdBVtPHZKde1eEpoaVQDqFI8Eo5IZwEm8sKfyinwKvC5xl5N5DBNF2bDZPcE61MRzSDRDOJaOYiIx8ipa5WxhbZaWC1PjW9xBlQAUrQynoPQlthPXJfJR2UBfqAzmbkbaSziYKMd-Sgr0fADceWWGaGrnuMaBc8I3ujlSiAbjT9euAUE6di1lqim0H1JpREzFRm5EnHOVd7FjFezAs8uR7x1OhQ45l6cZb6f-ccMX7O8dP3A_uZXvNs_nFrz_5v-Suy--Pj3Hz7fPT1ObnDk8wIxsUe2WnX2_ACsVhrXyZx-w03hzOI |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+imaging+anatomical+study+on+percutaneous+vertebral+augmentation+for+thoracic+spine+via+the+unilateral+transverse+process-pedicle+approach&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Yin%2C+Shi&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yan&rft.au=Du%2C+Ying&rft.au=Zou%2C+Junxin&rft.date=2025-04-24&rft.issn=1749-799X&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-025-05824-x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |