An imaging anatomical study on percutaneous vertebral augmentation for thoracic spine via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach

Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 414 - 13
Main Authors Yin, Shi, Zhang, Yan, Du, Ying, Zou, Junxin, Zhou, Linfeng, Zhang, Meilin, Zeng, Zezhong, Jia, Zhiwei, Xu, Zhendong, Zeng, Fangjun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 24.04.2025
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1749-799X
1749-799X
DOI10.1186/s13018-025-05824-x

Cover

Abstract Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. Methods PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A max ), the middle PIA (A mid ), the minimum PIA (A min ), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. Results The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A mid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right ( p  < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left ( p  < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.
AbstractList Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database.BACKGROUNDPercutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database.PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (Amax), the middle PIA (Amid), the minimum PIA (Amin), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared.METHODSPVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (Amax), the middle PIA (Amid), the minimum PIA (Amin), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared.The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the Amid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001).RESULTSThe mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the Amid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001).In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.CONCLUSIONIn PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A.sub.max), the middle PIA (A.sub.mid), the minimum PIA (A.sub.min), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A.sub.mid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001). In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.
Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. Methods PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A.sub.max), the middle PIA (A.sub.mid), the minimum PIA (A.sub.min), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. Results The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A.sub.mid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001). Conclusion In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer. Keywords: Percutaneous vertebral augmentation, Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, Thoracic spine, Unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach
Abstract Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. Methods PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (Amax), the middle PIA (Amid), the minimum PIA (Amin), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. Results The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the Amid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001). Conclusion In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.
Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. Methods PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A max ), the middle PIA (A mid ), the minimum PIA (A min ), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. Results The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A mid ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right ( p  < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left ( p  < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). This study aimed to investigate the anatomical parameters of PVA for thoracic spine via the UTPPA using a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) database. PVA was simulated through the UTPPA on 3D CT scans on 100 patients (50 men and 50 women), involving a total of 1200 thoracic vertebral bodies (T1-T12). Anatomical parameters, including the distance between the bone entry puncture point and the midline of the vertebral body (DEM), the puncture inner inclination angle (PIA), the maximum PIA (A ), the middle PIA (A ), the minimum PIA (A ), the safe range of the PIA (SRA), and the minimum transverse pedicle width (MTPW), were measured and compared. The mean DEM ranged from 17.60 ± 2.63 mm to 22.71 ± 4.07 mm, and the A ranged from 24.27° ± 2.21° to 40.77° ± 6.11°. The mean left DEM was significantly larger than the right (p < 0.001). The right SRA was significantly larger than the left (p < 0.001). The mean DEM, SRA and MTPW were significantly larger in men than in women (p < 0.001). In PVA for thoracic spine treatment using UTPPA, our study demonstrated that selecting this approach in men and puncturing from the right side in the thoracic vertebrae could be safer.
ArticleNumber 414
Audience Academic
Author Xu, Zhendong
Zhou, Linfeng
Yin, Shi
Du, Ying
Zou, Junxin
Zeng, Zezhong
Jia, Zhiwei
Zhang, Yan
Zhang, Meilin
Zeng, Fangjun
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Shi
  surname: Yin
  fullname: Yin, Shi
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yan
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Yan
  organization: Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ying
  surname: Du
  fullname: Du, Ying
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Junxin
  surname: Zou
  fullname: Zou, Junxin
  organization: Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Linfeng
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Linfeng
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Meilin
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Meilin
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Zezhong
  surname: Zeng
  fullname: Zeng, Zezhong
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Zhiwei
  surname: Jia
  fullname: Jia, Zhiwei
  email: jiazhiweivip@163.com
  organization: Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Zhendong
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Zhendong
  email: 18842810315@163.com
  organization: Department of Sports Medicine, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Fangjun
  surname: Zeng
  fullname: Zeng, Fangjun
  email: zengfangjun770207@126.com
  organization: Department of Spine Surgery, Ganzhou People’s Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40275271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1JaX7aF-iiGLrpxqkk2yN7VYbQn0Cgmxa6E9fStUeDR3IleUjeIQ_dO3EaMlCKFhJX3zlcXZ3z7MR5h1n2lrNLzpvVx8hLxpuCibpgdSOq4vZFdsZl1RaybX-dPDufZucxbhmriateZacVE7IWkp9l92uX2x0M1g05OEh-ZzWMeUyzucu9yycMek7g0M8x32NI2AW6h3nYoUuQLDG9D3na-ADa6jxO1mG-t0AlzGdnR0h4kKQALpJDxHwKXmOMxYTG6hFzmKgCevM6e9nDGPHN436R_fzy-cfVt-Lm-9frq_VNoeuyTAXIzrSrEjrkspaixx5KkFKDaWSFq67tdW3aCmsQIErdsI7zzjRt0zFusO7Li-x68TUetmoKNIBwpzxY9VDwYVAQ0qE1BSuEFppVZwxUTVd1RhjT1xpayXmlO_L6tHhNc7dDo2kq9Noj0-MbZzdq8HvFBROMC04OHx4dgv89Y0xqZ6PGcVymrkreVqtaVKwl9P2CDkC9Wdd7stQHXK2bkjqSUgqiLv9B0TJIv0sZ6i3VjwTvnr_hqfm_MSFALIAOPsaA_RPCmTpkUS1ZVJRF9ZBFdUuichFFgt2AQW39HBx97P9UfwCd8ecS
Cites_doi 10.1148/radiol.2223010718
10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.029
10.1097/md.0000000000006738
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c750b
10.1186/s12891-019-2602-4
10.1055/a-1785-5698
10.1080/10790268.2018.1451238
10.1097/brs.0000000000000493
10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004
10.3171/2012.8.spine111003
10.36076/ppj/2019.22.E91
10.1186/s13018-020-01875-4
10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60010-6
10.1016/j.archger.2014.05.004
10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.017
10.1186/s12891-015-0619-x
10.1038/s41598-020-73513-2
10.1097/brs.0000000000000243
10.1097/bsd.0000000000000546
10.1007/s00586-005-0943-1
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92272
10.3340/jkns.2007.42.5.363
10.1097/md.0000000000007328
10.1007/s00234-020-02495-9
10.1007/s00198-003-1412-5
10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6
10.1007/s11604-005-1542-0
10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.143
10.7860/jcdr/2017/25886.10461
10.1016/j.afos.2017.06.002
10.36076/ppj.2017.1.E13
10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.112
10.1007/s00198-015-3430-5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2025
2025. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
The Author(s) 2025 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2025
– notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13018-025-05824-x
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic




MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Open Access
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1749-799X
EndPage 13
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_a6ea9a86bdda48b4bd2ddf5ca97114cb
PMC12020121
A837117772
40275271
10_1186_s13018_025_05824_x
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: General project of key research and development plan of Ganzhou science and technology bureau
  grantid: 2022- -YB1384
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29L
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPT
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
AAYXX
CITATION
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-a7bd963abe17572fefa3a77cad874e6b9fc5d94e5a2a23c80b11bd898b01de5f3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1749-799X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:25:50 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:26:55 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 17:24:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:59:21 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:58:12 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:45:20 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 10 04:40:58 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:23:38 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
Unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation
Thoracic spine
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c533t-a7bd963abe17572fefa3a77cad874e6b9fc5d94e5a2a23c80b11bd898b01de5f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/a6ea9a86bdda48b4bd2ddf5ca97114cb
PMID 40275271
PQID 3194652409
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6ea9a86bdda48b4bd2ddf5ca97114cb
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12020121
proquest_miscellaneous_3194652409
gale_infotracmisc_A837117772
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A837117772
pubmed_primary_40275271
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_025_05824_x
springer_journals_10_1186_s13018_025_05824_x
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-04-24
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-04-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-04-24
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
PublicationTitleAbbrev J Orthop Surg Res
PublicationTitleAlternate J Orthop Surg Res
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References K Kobayashi (5824_CR23) 2006; 24
L Yuan (5824_CR12) 2020; 15
MX Liu (5824_CR8) 2020; 43
H Sun (5824_CR19) 2016; 19
W Chang (5824_CR3) 2017; 96
X Chen (5824_CR4) 2018; 21
L Yan (5824_CR11) 2016; 27
AC Dufresne (5824_CR34) 1998; 25
AK Kim (5824_CR14) 2002; 222
S Zhao (5824_CR18) 2017; 96
JH Lee (5824_CR13) 2017; 3
DM Kado (5824_CR25) 2003; 14
E Truumees (5824_CR21) 2004; 4
AG Tohmeh (5824_CR24) 1999; 24
J Liu (5824_CR30) 2020; 10
H Li (5824_CR37) 2015; 16
H Wang (5824_CR26) 2014; 59
S Zhu (5824_CR1) 2020; 62
H Wang (5824_CR7) 2019; 22
W Chen (5824_CR10) 2019; 122
H Zhang (5824_CR17) 2017; 20
S Wang (5824_CR6) 2014; 39
BM Boszczyk (5824_CR22) 2005; 14
L Wang (5824_CR29) 2023; 161
DF Kallmes (5824_CR32) 2002; 23
P Yin (5824_CR9) 2019; 59
D Wardlaw (5824_CR15) 2009; 373
MS Masoudi (5824_CR16) 2017; 30
HS Kim (5824_CR33) 2007; 42
J Liu (5824_CR35) 2010; 35
Y Chevalier (5824_CR31) 2008; 33
HH Lin (5824_CR36) 2019; 20
RL Cazzato (5824_CR2) 2021; 31
A Karmakar (5824_CR28) 2017; 11
H Wang (5824_CR27) 2012; 17
L Yan (5824_CR5) 2014; 39
R Schupfner (5824_CR20) 2021; 52
References_xml – volume: 222
  start-page: 737
  year: 2002
  ident: 5824_CR14
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2223010718
– volume: 4
  start-page: 218
  year: 2004
  ident: 5824_CR21
  publication-title: Spine Journal: Official J North Am Spine Soc
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.029
– volume: 96
  start-page: e6738
  year: 2017
  ident: 5824_CR3
  publication-title: Medicine
  doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000006738
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1722
  year: 2008
  ident: 5824_CR31
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c750b
– volume: 20
  start-page: 252
  year: 2019
  ident: 5824_CR36
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2602-4
– volume: 161
  start-page: 660
  year: 2023
  ident: 5824_CR29
  publication-title: Z Orthop Unfall
  doi: 10.1055/a-1785-5698
– volume: 43
  start-page: 201
  year: 2020
  ident: 5824_CR8
  publication-title: J Spinal Cord Med
  doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1451238
– volume: 25
  start-page: 123
  year: 1998
  ident: 5824_CR34
  publication-title: J Neuroradiol
– volume: 39
  start-page: B19
  year: 2014
  ident: 5824_CR5
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000493
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1772
  year: 1999
  ident: 5824_CR24
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004
– volume: 17
  start-page: 459
  year: 2012
  ident: 5824_CR27
  publication-title: J Neurosurg Spine
  doi: 10.3171/2012.8.spine111003
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1117
  year: 2002
  ident: 5824_CR32
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
– volume: 22
  start-page: E91
  year: 2019
  ident: 5824_CR7
  publication-title: Pain Physician
  doi: 10.36076/ppj/2019.22.E91
– volume: 15
  start-page: 359
  year: 2020
  ident: 5824_CR12
  publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res
  doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01875-4
– volume: 373
  start-page: 1016
  year: 2009
  ident: 5824_CR15
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60010-6
– volume: 59
  start-page: 657
  year: 2014
  ident: 5824_CR26
  publication-title: Arch Gerontol Geriatr
  doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.05.004
– volume: 52
  start-page: S63
  issue: Suppl 5
  year: 2021
  ident: 5824_CR20
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.017
– volume: 16
  start-page: 162
  year: 2015
  ident: 5824_CR37
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0619-x
– volume: 10
  start-page: 16320
  year: 2020
  ident: 5824_CR30
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73513-2
– volume: 39
  start-page: 701
  year: 2014
  ident: 5824_CR6
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000243
– volume: 30
  start-page: E1066
  year: 2017
  ident: 5824_CR16
  publication-title: Clin Spine Surg
  doi: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000546
– volume: 14
  start-page: 992
  year: 2005
  ident: 5824_CR22
  publication-title: Spine Res Soc
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0943-1
– volume: 35
  start-page: E1373
  year: 2010
  ident: 5824_CR35
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e92272
– volume: 42
  start-page: 363
  year: 2007
  ident: 5824_CR33
  publication-title: J Korean Neurosurg Soc
  doi: 10.3340/jkns.2007.42.5.363
– volume: 96
  start-page: e7328
  year: 2017
  ident: 5824_CR18
  publication-title: Medicine
  doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000007328
– volume: 19
  start-page: 551
  year: 2016
  ident: 5824_CR19
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 62
  start-page: 1353
  year: 2020
  ident: 5824_CR1
  publication-title: Neuroradiology
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02495-9
– volume: 14
  start-page: 589
  year: 2003
  ident: 5824_CR25
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1412-5
– volume: 21
  start-page: 327
  year: 2018
  ident: 5824_CR4
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 31
  start-page: 591
  year: 2021
  ident: 5824_CR2
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07198-6
– volume: 24
  start-page: 187
  year: 2006
  ident: 5824_CR23
  publication-title: Radiat Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11604-005-1542-0
– volume: 122
  start-page: 342
  year: 2019
  ident: 5824_CR10
  publication-title: World Neurosurg
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.143
– volume: 11
  start-page: Rc07
  year: 2017
  ident: 5824_CR28
  publication-title: J Clin Diagn Research: JCDR
  doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/25886.10461
– volume: 3
  start-page: 82
  year: 2017
  ident: 5824_CR13
  publication-title: Osteoporos Sarcopenia
  doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2017.06.002
– volume: 20
  start-page: E13
  year: 2017
  ident: 5824_CR17
  publication-title: Pain Physician
  doi: 10.36076/ppj.2017.1.E13
– volume: 59
  start-page: 146
  year: 2019
  ident: 5824_CR9
  publication-title: J Clin Neurosci
  doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.112
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1849
  year: 2016
  ident: 5824_CR11
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3430-5
SSID ssj0050584
Score 2.3535023
Snippet Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful...
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful osteoporotic...
Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating painful...
Abstract Background Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPPA) has shown promise for treating...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 414
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
CT imaging
Diagnostic imaging
Female
Fractures, Compression - diagnostic imaging
Fractures, Compression - surgery
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Osteoporosis
Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Osteoporotic Fractures - surgery
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation
Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Spinal Fractures - surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Thoracic spine
Thoracic Vertebrae - anatomy & histology
Thoracic Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach
Vertebroplasty - methods
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9UwFA8yQXwRv61OiSD4oMEmTdL08TocQ9AnB3sLJx91hbuu7N4r_hH7o3eStmOdIvjapCXN-fodTs4vhLzzsXTRlI5x4xomW6cZgG6YlyIEBaXjkA_IftdHx_LriTqZaHJSL8zN-j03-tMGfSw3LF26WiojJEO8eFfxSufCrD6YvS4GciPnppi_vrcIPJmf_08vfCMM3T4ieatOmsPP4UPyYMKNdDUK-hG5E_vH5N63qTL-hFyuetqd5SuHKPSYSWcaAJrZY-l5T4d44XcIBCNm-jTdwZwKxmsKu59nU_dRTxG_0u0p6oTvPN0M-F36qwN8FOmu79aQmpXXdJuiWzrMEekwdhmwIS1jHelMUP6UHB9--XFwxKabFphHuLdlULuAlgguIpqoRRtbqKCuPQRTy6hd03oVGhkVCBCVR9ly7oJpjCt5iKqtnpG9_ryPLwhtpPYIOmLQ2kvpFTiuWvygqkC0deAF-TCLwQ4joYbNiYjRdhSaRaHZLDT7uyCfk6SuZyYy7PwAdcROtmVBR2jAaBcCSOOkC6hnrfLQ1JjteVeQ90nONpks7pGHqfMAF5zIr-wKk_RUu65FQfYXM9HU_GL47awpNg2l82lZbhYdmdQK0VFTkOej5lyvWabKsKjxz81CpxY_tRzpu9PM9M0Fonku8NWPs_rZycds_rFrL_9v-ityX2RDkUzIfbK3vdjF1wi1tu5NtrErRYsoVA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title An imaging anatomical study on percutaneous vertebral augmentation for thoracic spine via the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-025-05824-x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40275271
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3194652409
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12020121
https://doaj.org/article/a6ea9a86bdda48b4bd2ddf5ca97114cb
Volume 20
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3La9swGBdbd9llbOzlrQsaDHbYRG1FluRjGlpKDmVsK-QmPj28BlI3NM7oH9E_up9ku9QdbJedApJj5O_5E9-LkE8u5Dbo3LJC24qJ2koGICvmBPe-hNwWkBJkT-XJmVgsy-W9UV8xJ6xrD9wR7gBkgAq0tN6D0FZYjy-pSweVQijvbLS-eZUPl6nOBqNb12IokdHyYIuWutAsjm7FHS7Y9cgNpW79f9rke07pYcLkg6hpckbHz8mzHkXSWXf6F-RRaF6Sm1lDVxdp6hCFBi_TqRMATQ1k6WVDN-HK7RALBrzs0ziGOcaM1xR2vy76AqSGIoSl7TmKhVs5ut0gBKW_V4BLge6a1RpivfKattHBxXyOQDddoQHbxIDPOtChR_krcnZ89HN-wvphC8wh4msZKOtRGcEGBBSK16GGKSjlwGslgrRV7UpfiVACBz51yN6isF5X2uaFD2U9fU32mssmvCW0EtIh7gheSieEK8EWZY0vLKfAa-WLjHwZaG82XU8Nk-4iWpqOUwY5ZRKnzHVGDiN77p6M_bDTAkqJ6aXE_EtKMvI5MtdErUUaOeiLD_DAsf-VmeE9PYavFc_I_uhJ1DY32v44iIeJWzFFLfHNoC0TskSAVGXkTScud2cWMTjMFX65HgnS6KPGO83qPDX7LjgC-oLjX78OMmd6M7P9C9Xe_Q-qvSdPedIZwbjYJ3vt1S58QAzW2gl5rJZqQp7MZosfC_w9PDr99h1X53I-Sap4C_oBO3M
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxQxFA6yBfVFvHe1agTBBw3OZJNM5nEVy7q2fbGFvoWTy7QL29lhL-KP8Ed7kpkpThXB1yQzJDm373AuIeSNC5kNOrMs17ZkorKKAaiSOcG9l5DZHFKC7ImanYn5uTzvisI2fbZ7H5JMmjqJtVYfNqhtc83i86uZ1FwwRI57GtGIGJG96XT-bd5rYDTqWvQFMn_9cmCEUq_-PzXybybpZrrkjZhpMkWH98m9DkPSaUv0B-RWqB-S28ddlPwR-Tmt6eIqPT9EoUavOrUEoKmTLF3VtAlrt0NQGNDrp_E95hg8XlLYXVx1lUg1RSxLt5fIH27h6KbB_9LvC8ChQHf1YgmxcHlJt9HSxcSOQJu24oA1cRvLQPtm5Y_J2eHn008z1r26wBxCvy2DwnqUSrABkUXBq1DBBIrCgdeFCMqWlZO-FEECBz5xSOc8t16X2ma5D7KaPCGjelWHfUJLoRwCkOCVckI4CTaXFf5QToBXhc_H5F1PBtO0zTVMckq0Mi3RDBLNJKKZH2PyMVLqemVsjJ0GVusL08mZARWgBK2s9yC0FdYjz1XSQVmg5-fsmLyNdDZRfPGOHHRVCLjh2AjLTNFhj3Hsgo_JwWAlip0bTL_uOcXEqZirluhmUKkJJREplWPytOWc6z2LGCXmBZ5cD3hqcKjhTL24TF2_c47IPuf46fue_Uynbzb_uLVn_7f8FbkzOz0-MkdfTr4-J3d5EhrBuDggo-16F14gBNval53E_QLL4jCy
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxQxFA5Sofgi3h2tGkHwQUN3skkm87hWl3orPljoWzi5TLuwnR12Z6U_oj_ak8xM6VQRfE0yQ5Jz-w7nEkLeuDCxQU8sy7UtmaisYgCqZE5w7yVMbA4pQfZIHR6LLyfy5FoVf8p2H0KSXU1D7NJUt_uNrzoR12p_g5o31yw-xTqRmguGKPK2iKYvhmvVwaCL0bxrMZTK_PW7kTlKXfv_1M3XjNPNxMkb0dNklOb3yN0eTdJZR_775FaoH5Dd7328_CG5nNV0cZ4eIqJQo3-dmgPQ1FOWrmrahLXbIjwM6P_T-DJzDCMvKWxPz_uapJoiqqXtGXKKWzi6afC_9NcCcCjQbb1YQixhXtI22ryY4hFo09UesCZuYxno0Lb8ETmef_p5cMj69xeYQxDYMiisR_kEGxBjFLwKFUyhKBx4XYigbFk56UsRJHDgU4cUz3PrdantJPdBVtPHZKde1eEpoaVQDqFI8Eo5IZwEm8sKfyinwKvC5xl5N5DBNF2bDZPcE61MRzSDRDOJaOYiIx8ipa5WxhbZaWC1PjW9xBlQAUrQynoPQlthPXJfJR2UBfqAzmbkbaSziYKMd-Sgr0fADceWWGaGrnuMaBc8I3ujlSiAbjT9euAUE6di1lqim0H1JpREzFRm5EnHOVd7FjFezAs8uR7x1OhQ45l6cZb6f-ccMX7O8dP3A_uZXvNs_nFrz_5v-Suy--Pj3Hz7fPT1ObnDk8wIxsUe2WnX2_ACsVhrXyZx-w03hzOI
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+imaging+anatomical+study+on+percutaneous+vertebral+augmentation+for+thoracic+spine+via+the+unilateral+transverse+process-pedicle+approach&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Yin%2C+Shi&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yan&rft.au=Du%2C+Ying&rft.au=Zou%2C+Junxin&rft.date=2025-04-24&rft.issn=1749-799X&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-025-05824-x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon