Differential Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Remodeling and Dynamics in Aortic Stenosis

Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Specific differences in LVOT geometry and dynamics between patients with AS and normal control subjects have not been described. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography Vol. 28; no. 11; pp. 1259 - 1266
Main Authors Mehrotra, Praveen, Flynn, Aidan W., Jansen, Katrijn, Tan, Timothy C., Mak, Gary, Julien, Howard M., Zeng, Xin, Picard, Michael H., Passeri, Jonathan J., Hung, Judy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Specific differences in LVOT geometry and dynamics between patients with AS and normal control subjects have not been described. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in LVOT geometry in patients with AS might relate to variable LVOT remodeling and stiffness relative to normal control subjects. In 54 patients with severe AS and 33 control subjects without AS, LVOT geometry, dynamics, remodeling, and stiffness were assessed by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. LVOT stiffness was measured by calculating the distensibility coefficient, defined as the percentage change in LVOT area relative to change in left ventricular pressure. LVOT remodeling was assessed by measuring the posterior LVOT wall thickness. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine independent associations with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity. LVOT area by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry was compared with areas obtained assuming circular or elliptical geometry. At end-diastole, LVOT geometry was similar between patients with AS and normal control subjects. In patients with AS, however, the percentage change in cross-sectional area (7.5% vs 14.7%, P < .001) from end-diastole to peak systole was lower compared with normal control subjects, while peak systolic ellipticity index was higher in patients with AS (1.18 vs 1.08, P < .001). Compared with control subjects, patients with AS had lower distensibility coefficients (4.7 ± 1.9 × 104 vs 12.5 ± 5.3 × 104 mm Hg−1, P < .001) and higher posterior LVOT wall thickness (3.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, posterior LVOT wall thickness and distensibility coefficient were independently associated with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity index. LVOT area underestimation by transthoracic echocardiography was higher in patients with AS when assuming circular geometry (20% vs 12%, P = .001). The LVOT is less distensible and undergoes remodeling in severe AS. These changes lead to greater peak systolic ellipticity and greater LVOT cross-sectional area underestimation relative to normal control subjects. These findings have important implications for the assessment of AS severity.
AbstractList Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Specific differences in LVOT geometry and dynamics between patients with AS and normal control subjects have not been described. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in LVOT geometry in patients with AS might relate to variable LVOT remodeling and stiffness relative to normal control subjects. In 54 patients with severe AS and 33 control subjects without AS, LVOT geometry, dynamics, remodeling, and stiffness were assessed by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. LVOT stiffness was measured by calculating the distensibility coefficient, defined as the percentage change in LVOT area relative to change in left ventricular pressure. LVOT remodeling was assessed by measuring the posterior LVOT wall thickness. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine independent associations with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity. LVOT area by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry was compared with areas obtained assuming circular or elliptical geometry. At end-diastole, LVOT geometry was similar between patients with AS and normal control subjects. In patients with AS, however, the percentage change in cross-sectional area (7.5% vs 14.7%, P < .001) from end-diastole to peak systole was lower compared with normal control subjects, while peak systolic ellipticity index was higher in patients with AS (1.18 vs 1.08, P < .001). Compared with control subjects, patients with AS had lower distensibility coefficients (4.7 ± 1.9 × 10(4) vs 12.5 ± 5.3 × 10(4) mm Hg(-1), P < .001) and higher posterior LVOT wall thickness (3.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, posterior LVOT wall thickness and distensibility coefficient were independently associated with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity index. LVOT area underestimation by transthoracic echocardiography was higher in patients with AS when assuming circular geometry (20% vs 12%, P = .001). The LVOT is less distensible and undergoes remodeling in severe AS. These changes lead to greater peak systolic ellipticity and greater LVOT cross-sectional area underestimation relative to normal control subjects. These findings have important implications for the assessment of AS severity.
Background Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Specific differences in LVOT geometry and dynamics between patients with AS and normal control subjects have not been described. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in LVOT geometry in patients with AS might relate to variable LVOT remodeling and stiffness relative to normal control subjects. Methods In 54 patients with severe AS and 33 control subjects without AS, LVOT geometry, dynamics, remodeling, and stiffness were assessed by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. LVOT stiffness was measured by calculating the distensibility coefficient, defined as the percentage change in LVOT area relative to change in left ventricular pressure. LVOT remodeling was assessed by measuring the posterior LVOT wall thickness. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine independent associations with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity. LVOT area by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry was compared with areas obtained assuming circular or elliptical geometry. Results At end-diastole, LVOT geometry was similar between patients with AS and normal control subjects. In patients with AS, however, the percentage change in cross-sectional area (7.5% vs 14.7%, P  < .001) from end-diastole to peak systole was lower compared with normal control subjects, while peak systolic ellipticity index was higher in patients with AS (1.18 vs 1.08, P  < .001). Compared with control subjects, patients with AS had lower distensibility coefficients (4.7 ± 1.9 × 104 vs 12.5 ± 5.3 × 104 mm Hg−1 , P  < .001) and higher posterior LVOT wall thickness (3.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, P  < .001). In multivariate analysis, posterior LVOT wall thickness and distensibility coefficient were independently associated with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity index. LVOT area underestimation by transthoracic echocardiography was higher in patients with AS when assuming circular geometry (20% vs 12%, P  = .001). Conclusions The LVOT is less distensible and undergoes remodeling in severe AS. These changes lead to greater peak systolic ellipticity and greater LVOT cross-sectional area underestimation relative to normal control subjects. These findings have important implications for the assessment of AS severity.
Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Specific differences in LVOT geometry and dynamics between patients with AS and normal control subjects have not been described. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in LVOT geometry in patients with AS might relate to variable LVOT remodeling and stiffness relative to normal control subjects. In 54 patients with severe AS and 33 control subjects without AS, LVOT geometry, dynamics, remodeling, and stiffness were assessed by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. LVOT stiffness was measured by calculating the distensibility coefficient, defined as the percentage change in LVOT area relative to change in left ventricular pressure. LVOT remodeling was assessed by measuring the posterior LVOT wall thickness. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine independent associations with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity. LVOT area by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry was compared with areas obtained assuming circular or elliptical geometry. At end-diastole, LVOT geometry was similar between patients with AS and normal control subjects. In patients with AS, however, the percentage change in cross-sectional area (7.5% vs 14.7%, P < .001) from end-diastole to peak systole was lower compared with normal control subjects, while peak systolic ellipticity index was higher in patients with AS (1.18 vs 1.08, P < .001). Compared with control subjects, patients with AS had lower distensibility coefficients (4.7 ± 1.9 × 104 vs 12.5 ± 5.3 × 104 mm Hg−1, P < .001) and higher posterior LVOT wall thickness (3.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, posterior LVOT wall thickness and distensibility coefficient were independently associated with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity index. LVOT area underestimation by transthoracic echocardiography was higher in patients with AS when assuming circular geometry (20% vs 12%, P = .001). The LVOT is less distensible and undergoes remodeling in severe AS. These changes lead to greater peak systolic ellipticity and greater LVOT cross-sectional area underestimation relative to normal control subjects. These findings have important implications for the assessment of AS severity.
Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Specific differences in LVOT geometry and dynamics between patients with AS and normal control subjects have not been described. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in LVOT geometry in patients with AS might relate to variable LVOT remodeling and stiffness relative to normal control subjects.BACKGROUNDLeft ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Specific differences in LVOT geometry and dynamics between patients with AS and normal control subjects have not been described. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in LVOT geometry in patients with AS might relate to variable LVOT remodeling and stiffness relative to normal control subjects.In 54 patients with severe AS and 33 control subjects without AS, LVOT geometry, dynamics, remodeling, and stiffness were assessed by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. LVOT stiffness was measured by calculating the distensibility coefficient, defined as the percentage change in LVOT area relative to change in left ventricular pressure. LVOT remodeling was assessed by measuring the posterior LVOT wall thickness. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine independent associations with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity. LVOT area by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry was compared with areas obtained assuming circular or elliptical geometry.METHODSIn 54 patients with severe AS and 33 control subjects without AS, LVOT geometry, dynamics, remodeling, and stiffness were assessed by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. LVOT stiffness was measured by calculating the distensibility coefficient, defined as the percentage change in LVOT area relative to change in left ventricular pressure. LVOT remodeling was assessed by measuring the posterior LVOT wall thickness. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine independent associations with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity. LVOT area by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry was compared with areas obtained assuming circular or elliptical geometry.At end-diastole, LVOT geometry was similar between patients with AS and normal control subjects. In patients with AS, however, the percentage change in cross-sectional area (7.5% vs 14.7%, P < .001) from end-diastole to peak systole was lower compared with normal control subjects, while peak systolic ellipticity index was higher in patients with AS (1.18 vs 1.08, P < .001). Compared with control subjects, patients with AS had lower distensibility coefficients (4.7 ± 1.9 × 10(4) vs 12.5 ± 5.3 × 10(4) mm Hg(-1), P < .001) and higher posterior LVOT wall thickness (3.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, posterior LVOT wall thickness and distensibility coefficient were independently associated with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity index. LVOT area underestimation by transthoracic echocardiography was higher in patients with AS when assuming circular geometry (20% vs 12%, P = .001).RESULTSAt end-diastole, LVOT geometry was similar between patients with AS and normal control subjects. In patients with AS, however, the percentage change in cross-sectional area (7.5% vs 14.7%, P < .001) from end-diastole to peak systole was lower compared with normal control subjects, while peak systolic ellipticity index was higher in patients with AS (1.18 vs 1.08, P < .001). Compared with control subjects, patients with AS had lower distensibility coefficients (4.7 ± 1.9 × 10(4) vs 12.5 ± 5.3 × 10(4) mm Hg(-1), P < .001) and higher posterior LVOT wall thickness (3.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, posterior LVOT wall thickness and distensibility coefficient were independently associated with peak systolic LVOT ellipticity index. LVOT area underestimation by transthoracic echocardiography was higher in patients with AS when assuming circular geometry (20% vs 12%, P = .001).The LVOT is less distensible and undergoes remodeling in severe AS. These changes lead to greater peak systolic ellipticity and greater LVOT cross-sectional area underestimation relative to normal control subjects. These findings have important implications for the assessment of AS severity.CONCLUSIONSThe LVOT is less distensible and undergoes remodeling in severe AS. These changes lead to greater peak systolic ellipticity and greater LVOT cross-sectional area underestimation relative to normal control subjects. These findings have important implications for the assessment of AS severity.
Author Mak, Gary
Passeri, Jonathan J.
Jansen, Katrijn
Tan, Timothy C.
Zeng, Xin
Picard, Michael H.
Hung, Judy
Mehrotra, Praveen
Flynn, Aidan W.
Julien, Howard M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Praveen
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2225-7304
  surname: Mehrotra
  fullname: Mehrotra, Praveen
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Aidan W.
  surname: Flynn
  fullname: Flynn, Aidan W.
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Katrijn
  surname: Jansen
  fullname: Jansen, Katrijn
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Timothy C.
  surname: Tan
  fullname: Tan, Timothy C.
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Gary
  surname: Mak
  fullname: Mak, Gary
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Howard M.
  surname: Julien
  fullname: Julien, Howard M.
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Xin
  surname: Zeng
  fullname: Zeng, Xin
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Michael H.
  surname: Picard
  fullname: Picard, Michael H.
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Jonathan J.
  surname: Passeri
  fullname: Passeri, Jonathan J.
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Judy
  surname: Hung
  fullname: Hung, Judy
  email: jhung@partners.org
  organization: Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26307374$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkk1rFTEUhoNU7G31D7iQLN3MeDJfmYgIpR8qXCjYWtyFJHNGc52btElGuf_eDLfdFKyrEHifN-Q554gcOO-QkNcMSgase7cp0fz0ZQWsLYGXwPpnZMVA8KLjoj0gK-hFU_Ca8UNyFOMGANoe4AU5rLoaeM2bFbk5s-OIAV2yaqJrHBO9yZdgzTypQC_nNE7-D70OyiT6Fbd-wMm6H1S5gZ7tnNpaE6l19MSHZA29Suh8tPEleT6qKeKr-_OYfLs4vz79XKwvP305PVkXpq2rVGiNQuveGM2HWg9NVXf9iNCg6oVSwoDSGsSgoK5VUzFsuNYCO1M1QpgeRH1M3u57b4O_mzEmubXR4DQph36Oki2_71sBkKNv7qOz3uIgb4PdqrCTDy5yoN8HTPAxBhylsUkl67MOZSfJQC7a5UYu2uWiXQKXWXtGq0foQ_uT0Ic9hFnQb4tBRmPRGRxsQJPk4O3T-MdHuMmTsUZNv3CHcePn4LJ6yWSsJMirZRkWG6zNa9DU33PB-38X_O_1v5TyxM8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_3139476
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2020_570689
crossref_primary_10_1530_ERP_16_0004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00059_016_4481_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10554_021_02479_7
crossref_primary_10_1530_ERP_16_0041
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2016_08_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2017_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1093_ehjci_jew335
crossref_primary_10_3179_jjmu_JJMU_R_179
crossref_primary_10_1213_XAA_0000000000001500
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2017_10_022
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12574_018_0383_7
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jvca_2020_11_031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2020_06_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacc_2016_02_057
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12410_017_9440_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14432
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12471_020_01501_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2019_06_012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12410_019_9518_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2019_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10554_019_01532_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2020_03_020
crossref_primary_10_1161_CIRCULATIONAHA_116_025457
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jscai_2023_101294
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11886_018_0949_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2016_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14323
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14883
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14681
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2015_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1136_heartjnl_2017_312917
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12574_023_00638_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11886_019_1172_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_15664
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2021_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijcard_2017_03_112
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10554_019_01745_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2016_12_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10396_019_00991_x
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jvca_2016_05_012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00059_017_4587_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjcard_2016_05_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjmed_2016_12_025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2017_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jvca_2020_10_026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cjca_2017_03_024
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehx381
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00479.x
10.1080/10976640600778007
10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543
10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.072
10.1016/j.echo.2013.10.007
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695
10.1136/hrt.41.3.263
10.1093/eurheartj/eht094
10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029
10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.071
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681
10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.391
10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964916
10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.967554
10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.045
10.1007/s10554-008-9362-9
10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.12.005
10.1093/eurheartj/ehn022
10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.885152
10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302957
10.2214/AJR.08.1986
10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.009
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 American Society of Echocardiography
American Society of Echocardiography
Copyright © 2015 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 American Society of Echocardiography
– notice: American Society of Echocardiography
– notice: Copyright © 2015 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE


MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-6795
EndPage 1266
ExternalDocumentID 26307374
10_1016_j_echo_2015_07_018
S089473171500543X
1_s2_0_S089473171500543X
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-RU
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.XZ
0R~
1B1
1P~
4.4
457
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABDQB
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEFWE
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
C45
C5W
CAG
COF
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
K-O
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OA.
OL~
OVD
P2P
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SSZ
TEORI
UNMZH
UV1
WOW
XH2
Z5R
ADPAM
AFCTW
RIG
AAIAV
AGZHU
ALXNB
ZA5
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-bbe9bb8ccb7d3bd42368fe04ea89aa9c0abb09da033a421e47bb9e6c2499c8093
ISSN 0894-7317
1097-6795
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 22:48:41 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:05:58 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:52:18 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:13:28 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:32:23 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:20 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:32:30 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords Aortic stenosis
EI
TTE
Three-dimensional echocardiography
AVA
LVOT
CSA
3D
AS
2D
Dynamics
TEE
Stiffness
Left ventricular outflow tract
DC
Transesophageal echocardiography
Cross-sectional area
Transthoracic echocardiography
Distensibility coefficient
Two-dimensional
Three-dimensional
Ellipticity index
Aortic valve area
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2015 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c532t-bbe9bb8ccb7d3bd42368fe04ea89aa9c0abb09da033a421e47bb9e6c2499c8093
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-2225-7304
PMID 26307374
PQID 1731785900
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1731785900
pubmed_primary_26307374
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_echo_2015_07_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2015_07_018
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_echo_2015_07_018
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S089473171500543X
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_echo_2015_07_018
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
PublicationTitleAlternate J Am Soc Echocardiogr
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Halpern, Mallya, Sewell, Shulman, Zwas (bib8) 2009; 192
Adda, Mielot, Giorgi, Cransac, Zirphile, Donal (bib18) 2012; 5
Kasel, Cassese, Bleiziffer, Amaki, Hahn, Kastrati (bib10) 2013; 6
Ng, Delgado, van der Kley, Shanks, van de Veire, Bertini (bib3) 2010; 3
Hamdan, Guetta, Konen, Goitein, Segev, Raanani (bib15) 2012; 59
Minners, Allgeier, Gohlke-Baerwolf, Kienzle, Neumann, Jander (bib19) 2008; 29
Walmsley (bib14) 1979; 41
Saitoh, Shiota, Izumo, Gurudevan, Tolstrup, Siegel (bib1) 2012; 109
Burgstahler, Kunze, Loffler, Gawaz, Hombach, Merkle (bib7) 2006; 8
Flynn, Afilalo, Agnihotri, Castrillo, Shahian, Picard (bib13) 2013; 99
Mehrotra, Jansen, Flynn, Tan, Elmariah, Picard (bib17) 2013; 34
Hachicha, Dumesnil, Bogaty, Pibarot (bib9) 2007; 115
Doddamani, Grushko, Makaryus, Jain, Bello, Friedman (bib4) 2009; 25
Lancellotti, Magne, Donal, Davin, O’Connor, Rosca (bib16) 2012; 59
Clavel, Malouf, Messika-Zeitoun, Araoz, Michelena, Enriquez-Sarano (bib21) 2015; 8
Baumgartner, Hung, Bermejo, Chambers, Evangelista, Griffin (bib11) 2009; 22
Doddamani, Bello, Friedman, Banerjee, Bowers, Kim (bib2) 2007; 24
Eleid, Sorajja, Michelena, Malouf, Scott, Pellikka (bib20) 2013; 128
O’Brien, Schoenhagen, Kapadia, Svensson, Rodriguez, Griffin (bib5) 2011; 4
Wu, Kaku, Takeuchi, Otani, Yoshitani, Tamura (bib22) 2014; 27
Utsunomiya, Yamamoto, Horiguchi, Kunita, Okada, Yamazato (bib6) 2011; 157
Poh, Levine, Solis, Shen, Flaherty, Kang (bib12) 2008; 29
Walmsley (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib14) 1979; 41
Burgstahler (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib7) 2006; 8
Adda (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib18) 2012; 5
Doddamani (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib4) 2009; 25
Hachicha (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib9) 2007; 115
Flynn (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib13) 2013; 99
Lancellotti (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib16) 2012; 59
Clavel (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib21) 2015; 8
Doddamani (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib2) 2007; 24
Halpern (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib8) 2009; 192
Ng (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib3) 2010; 3
O’Brien (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib5) 2011; 4
Mehrotra (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib17) 2013; 34
Eleid (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib20) 2013; 128
Saitoh (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib1) 2012; 109
Baumgartner (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib11) 2009; 22
Minners (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib19) 2008; 29
Wu (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib22) 2014; 27
Kasel (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib10) 2013; 6
Hamdan (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib15) 2012; 59
Utsunomiya (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib6) 2011; 157
Poh (10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib12) 2008; 29
26542335 - J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Nov;28(11):1267-9
References_xml – volume: 8
  start-page: 248
  year: 2015
  end-page: 257
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2526
  year: 2008
  end-page: 2535
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 192
  start-page: 1668
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1673
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 99
  start-page: 247
  year: 2013
  end-page: 252
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Aortic sclerosis is associated with mortality and major morbidity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery
  publication-title: Heart
– volume: 27
  start-page: 32
  year: 2014
  end-page: 41
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Aortic root geometry in patients with aortic stenosis assessed by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 25
  start-page: 175
  year: 2009
  end-page: 181
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 157
  start-page: 347
  year: 2011
  end-page: 353
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Underestimation of aortic valve area in calcified aortic valve disease: effects of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity
  publication-title: Int J Cardiol
– volume: 5
  start-page: 27
  year: 2012
  end-page: 35
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 3
  start-page: 94
  year: 2010
  end-page: 102
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 41
  start-page: 263
  year: 1979
  end-page: 267
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Anatomy of left ventricular outflow tract
  publication-title: Br Heart J
– volume: 6
  start-page: 249
  year: 2013
  end-page: 262
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1906
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1914
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1043
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1048
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 24
  start-page: 860
  year: 2007
  end-page: 866
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by real time 3D echocardiography: implications for the determination of aortic valve area
  publication-title: Echocardiography
– volume: 8
  start-page: 825
  year: 2006
  end-page: 829
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
– volume: 109
  start-page: 1626
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1631
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 23
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 59
  start-page: 235
  year: 2012
  end-page: 243
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 59
  start-page: 119
  year: 2012
  end-page: 127
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 128
  start-page: 1781
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1789
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 4
  start-page: 566
  year: 2011
  end-page: 573
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 115
  start-page: 2856
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2864
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 24
  start-page: 860
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib2
  article-title: Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by real time 3D echocardiography: implications for the determination of aortic valve area
  publication-title: Echocardiography
  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00479.x
– volume: 8
  start-page: 825
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib7
  article-title: Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
  doi: 10.1080/10976640600778007
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1043
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib19
  article-title: Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543
– volume: 59
  start-page: 235
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib16
  article-title: Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.072
– volume: 27
  start-page: 32
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib22
  article-title: Aortic root geometry in patients with aortic stenosis assessed by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.10.007
– volume: 128
  start-page: 1781
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib20
  article-title: Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695
– volume: 41
  start-page: 263
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib14
  article-title: Anatomy of left ventricular outflow tract
  publication-title: Br Heart J
  doi: 10.1136/hrt.41.3.263
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1906
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib17
  article-title: Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht094
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib11
  article-title: Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029
– volume: 157
  start-page: 347
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib6
  article-title: Underestimation of aortic valve area in calcified aortic valve disease: effects of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity
  publication-title: Int J Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.071
– volume: 115
  start-page: 2856
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib9
  article-title: Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681
– volume: 109
  start-page: 1626
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib1
  article-title: Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.391
– volume: 4
  start-page: 566
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib5
  article-title: Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964916
– volume: 5
  start-page: 27
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib18
  article-title: Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.967554
– volume: 59
  start-page: 119
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib15
  article-title: Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.045
– volume: 25
  start-page: 175
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib4
  article-title: Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by 64-slice multi-detector CT
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s10554-008-9362-9
– volume: 6
  start-page: 249
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib10
  article-title: Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.12.005
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2526
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib12
  article-title: Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn022
– volume: 3
  start-page: 94
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib3
  article-title: Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.885152
– volume: 99
  start-page: 247
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib13
  article-title: Aortic sclerosis is associated with mortality and major morbidity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery
  publication-title: Heart
  doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302957
– volume: 192
  start-page: 1668
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib8
  article-title: Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1986
– volume: 8
  start-page: 248
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018_bib21
  article-title: Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.009
– reference: 26542335 - J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Nov;28(11):1267-9
SSID ssj0005800
Score 2.3639297
Snippet Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic...
Background Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry is variable and often elliptical, which can affect aortic valve area calculation in patients with...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1259
SubjectTerms Aged, 80 and over
Aortic stenosis
Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications
Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Cardiovascular
Diagnosis, Differential
Dynamics
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Female
Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Left ventricular outflow tract
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Stiffness
Three-dimensional echocardiography
Ventricular Outflow Obstruction - diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Outflow Obstruction - etiology
Ventricular Remodeling
Title Differential Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Remodeling and Dynamics in Aortic Stenosis
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S089473171500543X
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S089473171500543X
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26307374
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1731785900
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZKJyFeEHfKTUbirUqVu-PHsjEm2OCBrezNih1HtKoStKYg-D38UM6J7TRj64C9RFVV24nPF5_P7nfOIeRViWnOeMK8JGKwQZGq9CT4EU_HvAA6X_q6DY8--pAenMTvTpPTweBXT7W0buRE_bw0ruQ6VoXvwK4YJfsflu06hS_gM9gXrmBhuP6TjfdsdZMGj70PddmMZ3hYOzfa0o_rplzW3zF_uULtcVv0xsUk7plK9K0adlpj1yj4qurVfLWFr_ZiUKpO7Im6RFhAVatq7SW_blP6fjmrm7aMEWZF-qY3QWf7yx-GNk_nBXT2edLpePLKngi9x9IBi41K2FZRNsga7076pxVBYsP2uiM0F0ZzTuXpZzz2WGSCOCfarMQ-Z17KTAVOt1SHWR-SQW_hBZ7Ge048CE0tlwsOwpxVLCYa5gaFfUmbutW6gPOJtz_hbeFdAWcGYhud3iA7IWxGwiHZefv6cDbdSIkyE-rkHsMGZxkd4Z8jbSNA2zY4LdE5vkNuW4vTqYHbXTLQ1T1y88hqMO6TWR91FFFHe6ijFnW0RR3doI4C6qhDHZ1X1KCOOtQ9ICf7b453DzxbncNTSRQ2npSaS5kpJVkRyQJoeZqV2o91nvE858rPpfR5kftRlMdhoGMmJdepgv0-V5nPo4dkWNWVfkxo4bMwToBKxzGmq-SS5cAjCxVhPfQwTUYkcFMmlE1djxVUlsJpFBcCp1ngNAufCZjmERl3bb6axC1X_jpylhAuJBmcqADYXNmKXdZKr-wasRKBWIXCFxegNCJJ19JSXUNh_zriSwcTAX4A_9zLK12vYSTsPsMawCPyyOCne-4wRU_O4ifXHPUpubV5l5-RYXO21s-BizfyhX0VfgNFRd5e
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential+Left+Ventricular+Outflow+Tract+Remodeling+and+Dynamics+in+Aortic+Stenosis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Society+of+Echocardiography&rft.au=Mehrotra%2C+Praveen&rft.au=Flynn%2C+Aidan+W.&rft.au=Jansen%2C+Katrijn&rft.au=Tan%2C+Timothy+C.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0894-7317&rft.eissn=1097-6795&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1266&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.echo.2015.07.018&rft.externalDocID=S089473171500543X
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F08947317%2FS0894731714X00118%2Fcov150h.gif