Systematic review with meta-analysis: encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation – evidence for clinical efficacy

Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. Methods: A systemati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology Vol. 14; p. 17562848211041004
Main Authors Cold, Frederik, Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl, Dahlerup, Jens Frederik, Petersen, Andreas Munk, Hvas, Christian Lodberg, Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 2021
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression. Results: A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported. Conclusions: Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results. Plain Language Summary Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects. Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years. Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction. Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings: -Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed. -The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment. -Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection. -The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered. -Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment. -There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria.
AbstractList Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression. A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (  = 18, 51%) and patients (  = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported. Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results. The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects.Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years.Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction.Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings:-Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed.-The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment.-Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of infection.-The treatment is effective in the treatment of infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered.-Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment.-There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria.
Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression. Results: A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported. Conclusions: Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results. Plain Language Summary Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects. Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years. Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction. Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings: -Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed. -The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment. -Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection. -The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered. -Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment. -There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria.
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes.BACKGROUNDFaecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes.A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression.METHODSA systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression.A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported.RESULTSA total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported.Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results.CONCLUSIONSEncapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results.Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects.Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years.Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction.Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings:-Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed.-The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment.-Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection.-The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered.-Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment.-There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYTransfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects.Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years.Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction.Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings:-Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed.-The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment.-Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection.-The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered.-Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment.-There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria.
Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression. Results: A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies ( n  = 18, 51%) and patients ( n  = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported. Conclusions: Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results. Plain Language Summary Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects. Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years. Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction. Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings: -Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed. -The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment. -Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection. -The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered. -Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment. -There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria.
Author Cold, Frederik
Hvas, Christian Lodberg
Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg
Dahlerup, Jens Frederik
Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl
Petersen, Andreas Munk
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Frederik
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2085-8496
  surname: Cold
  fullname: Cold, Frederik
  email: frederik.cold@regionh.dk
  organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Aleris-Hamlet Hospitals, Copenhagen, Søborg, Denmark
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Simon Mark Dahl
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5135-7435
  surname: Baunwall
  fullname: Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl
  organization: Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jens Frederik
  surname: Dahlerup
  fullname: Dahlerup, Jens Frederik
  organization: Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Andreas Munk
  surname: Petersen
  fullname: Petersen, Andreas Munk
  organization: Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Christian Lodberg
  surname: Hvas
  fullname: Hvas, Christian Lodberg
  organization: Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Lars Hestbjerg
  surname: Hansen
  fullname: Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg
  organization: Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen University, Frederiksberg, Denmark
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34484424$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu1TAQhiNURC_wAGyQJTZsUnyPwwIJVVwqVWIBrK2JMzn1URIf7KRHZ8c78IY8CT6klLYIVmON___T_B4fFwdjGLEonjJ6ylhVvWSV0txIwxmjklEqHxRH-165bx7cOh8WxymtKdW8EvWj4lBIaaTk8qjYftqlCQeYvCMRrzxuydZPl2TACUoYod8ln14RHB1s0tzDhC3pAB30ZPAuhsaHCcgUYUybHsYpg8JIfnz7TjKszTYkXYjE9X70exN2Xa5u97h42EGf8Ml1PSm-vHv7-exDefHx_fnZm4vSKcGnshFSc005COxEg65FoUFVOa3ivKamkkYw3iBtkaJWggHHhnWtgJar1hhxUpwv3DbA2m6iHyDubABvfzVCXFmIOXyPltaNcrRz2oCQirV1resKaWMaJ5CpJrNeL6zN3AzYOhxz7v4O9O7N6C_tKlxZI1mOITPgxTUghq8zpskOPjns88NhmJPlStea5eA8S5_fk67DHPM-skozwY1QkmbVs9sT3Yzye79ZwBZBXlVKEbsbCaN2_4fsX38oe6p7HueXveZQvv-v83RxJljhn4H_bfgJV03ZGw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_09_008
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v29_i20_3185
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1286429
crossref_primary_10_1136_egastro_2024_100099
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2023_1114798
crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848251314820
crossref_primary_10_20517_mrr_2023_80
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csbj_2022_01_009
crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12050868
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14183726
crossref_primary_10_3390_ph15111398
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14232635
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_41182_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinf_2024_106216
crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11203272
crossref_primary_10_36488_cmac_2022_4_308_313
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14122528
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_959856
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17642
crossref_primary_10_1136_dtb_2022_000056
crossref_primary_10_1136_dtb_2023_000003
crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848241289065
Cites_doi 10.18637/jss.v036.i03
10.1177/2050640619839918
10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017
10.1093/cid/ciaa737
10.1214/aoms/1177729756
10.1177/2050640618780762
10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316434
10.1097/MCG.0000000000000330
10.1111/apt.14201
10.1186/s40168-018-0549-6
10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017731
10.1111/apt.13236
10.18620/ctt-1866-8836-2020-9-2-47-59
10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318320
10.1111/apt.16148
10.1111/apt.15116
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001194
10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.038
10.1016/j.jhin.2018.07.005
10.1186/s12879-015-0930-z
10.1111/apt.13868
10.1038/ajg.2015.81
10.1111/apt.13144
10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019
10.1371/journal.pone.0205064
10.1159/000497042
10.14309/ctg.0000000000000012
10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316818
10.1001/jama.2014.13875
10.1080/19490976.2020.1854640
10.1002/hep.24423
10.1055/a-0821-7166
10.1007/s10620-018-5396-6
10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7
10.1002/hep.30690
10.1001/jama.2018.20046
10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100642
10.1093/cid/ciy149
10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.006
10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.038
10.1097/MEG.0000000000001147
10.1093/ofid/ofy334
10.1007/s12328-017-0813-5
10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30182-4
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.010
10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010
10.1016/j.nutres.2020.06.018
10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.001
10.1080/00365521.2019.1585939
10.1136/bmj.l4898
10.1155/2019/4549298
10.1128/mBio.01586-19
10.1002/sim.1186
10.1093/ageing/afaa073
10.1016/j.jhin.2019.12.022
10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz073
10.1001/jama.2014.17103
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001495
10.1186/s12888-020-02654-5
10.3748/wjg.v24.i47.5403
10.1097/MD.0000000000011706
10.1007/s10620-019-05596-5
10.1001/jama.2017.17077
10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30198-0
10.1371/journal.pmed.1003051
10.1210/endocr/bqab065
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004
10.1093/jcag/gwz006.050
10.1111/apt.15330
10.1177/2050640620967898
10.1056/NEJMoa1205037
10.1097/MD.0000000000022129
10.1007/s15010-018-1190-9
10.1155/2018/8941340
10.1186/s12916-016-0680-9
10.1093/ofid/ofw091
10.1111/apt.14173
10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.006
10.14309/00000434-201510001-02248
10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024968
10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.019
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s), 2021
The Author(s), 2021.
The Author(s), 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s), 2021 2021 SAGE Publications Ltd unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), 2021
– notice: The Author(s), 2021.
– notice: The Author(s), 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s), 2021 2021 SAGE Publications Ltd unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses
DBID AFRWT
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1177/17562848211041004
DatabaseName Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection (NC LIVE)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: AFRWT
  name: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
  url: http://journals.sagepub.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 4
  dbid: 7X7
  name: Health & Medical Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1756-2848
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_09b5c0fc68a3451d99697e0b8bc3e15b
PMC8414624
34484424
10_1177_17562848211041004
10.1177_17562848211041004
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: innovationsfonden
  grantid: 7076-00129B, MICROHEALTH
  funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100012774
– fundername: innovationsfonden
  grantid: 8056-00006B, CEFTA
  funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100012774
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 8056-00006B, CEFTA
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 7076-00129B, MICROHEALTH
GroupedDBID ---
-TM
01A
0R~
123
18M
29Q
4.4
53G
54M
5VS
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AABMB
AADUE
AAJQC
AAKDD
AAQDB
AARDL
AARIX
AASGM
ABAWP
ABEIX
ABFWQ
ABJIS
ABKRH
ABQXT
ABRHV
ABUWG
ABVFX
ACARO
ACDSZ
ACDXX
ACGFS
ACOFE
ACROE
ACRPL
ADBBV
ADEBD
ADNMO
ADOGD
ADYCS
ADZZY
AENEX
AEQLS
AERKM
AEUHG
AEWDL
AEXNY
AFCOW
AFEET
AFKRA
AFKRG
AFRWT
AFUIA
AFWMB
AGNHF
AGQPQ
AHHFK
AJUZI
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
ARTOV
ASPBG
AUVAJ
AVWKF
AZFZN
B8M
BAWUL
BCNDV
BDDNI
BENPR
BKSCU
BPHCQ
BSEHC
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
CDWPY
CFDXU
COF
CS3
DC-
DC.
DIK
DOPDO
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
FEDTE
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION
GX1
H13
HF~
HMCUK
HVGLF
HYE
HZ~
J8X
K.F
N9A
O9-
OK1
P.B
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
ROL
RPM
S01
SAUOL
SCDPB
SCNPE
SFC
UKHRP
ZONMY
ZPPRI
ZRKOI
ZSSAH
AAYXX
ACHEB
CITATION
31X
AADTT
AATBZ
ACGZU
ACSBE
ACSIQ
AEUIJ
AEWHI
B8Z
DV7
M4V
NPM
SGV
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b3462602a3ef3becde36a57041522908748312be0de0e6531a2eb1fd3ad25d883
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1756-2848
1756-283X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:11 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 17:50:00 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:55:12 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 12:17:38 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:55:28 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:27:46 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:08 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:28:11 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords faecal microbiota transplantation
encapsulated
meta-analysis
Clostridioides difficile
ulcerative colitis
capsules
systematic review
lyophilisation
microbiome
Language English
License This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
The Author(s), 2021.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c532t-b3462602a3ef3becde36a57041522908748312be0de0e6531a2eb1fd3ad25d883
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-2085-8496
0000-0002-5135-7435
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2613283540?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 34484424
PQID 2613283540
PQPubID 4450843
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_09b5c0fc68a3451d99697e0b8bc3e15b
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8414624
proquest_miscellaneous_2569615322
proquest_journals_2613283540
pubmed_primary_34484424
crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848211041004
crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_17562848211041004
sage_journals_10_1177_17562848211041004
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2021
  text: 2021-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London, England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London, England
– name: England
– name: London
– name: Sage UK: London, England
PublicationTitle Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology
PublicationTitleAlternate Therap Adv Gastroenterol
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher SAGE Publications
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: SAGE Publications
– name: Sage Publications Ltd
– name: SAGE Publishing
References Konig, Siebenhaar, Hogenauer 2017; 45
Reigadas, Olmedo, Valerio 2018; 31
Ott, Waetzig, Rehman 2017; 152
Youngster, Russell, Pindar 2014; 312
Hvas, Dahl Jorgensen, Jorgensen 2019; 156
Casen, Vebo, Sekelja 2015; 42
Holst, Gasbjerg, Rosenkilde 2021; 162
Duan, Zhu, Wang 2019; 10
Iqbal, Anwar, Karim 2018; 30
Mao, Jiang, Sun 2020; 99
Cold, Browne, Gunther 2019; 54
Cammarota, Masucci, Ianiro 2015; 41
Chinna Meyyappan, Forth, Wallace 2020; 20
Marcella, Cui, Kelly 2021; 53
Proença, Allegretti, Bernardo 2020; 83
Baunwall, Lee, Eriksen 2020; 29–30
Freeman, Tukey 1950; 21
Theede, Holck, Ibsen 2015; 13
Allegretti, Fischer, Sagi 2019; 64
Tian, Ding, Gong 2015; 49
Yu, Gao, Stastka 2020; 17
Chen, Yang, Lu 2011; 54
Kassam, Fridman, Burgess 2015; 110
Jørgensen, Rubak, Damsgaard 2020; 49
Walsh, Ghosh, Brain 2014; 8
Reigadas, Bouza, Olmedo 2020; 105
Biehl, Cruz Aguilar, Farowski 2018; 46
Saha, Tariq, Tosh 2019; 25
Adler, Tabaa, Kassam 2019; 64
Costello, Hughes, Waters 2019; 321
Egger, Davey Smith, Schneider 1997; 315
Staley, Kaiser, Vaughn 2019; 10
Greenberg, Youngster, Cohen 2018; 24
Youngster, Mahabamunuge, Systrom 2016; 14
Sterne, Savovicá, Page 2019; 366
Lachmund, Von Arnim, Canbay 2018; 23
Bagdasarian, Rao, Malani 2015; 313
Goloshchapov, Bakin, Kucher 2020; 9
Green, Davis, Berk 2020; 12
Chehri, Christensen, Halkjaer 2018; 97
Herfarth, Barnes, Long 2019; 4
Hecker, Obrenovich, Cadnum 2016; 3
Peri, Aguilar, Tüffers 2019; 7
Pringle, Soto, Chung 2019; 17
Torres Soto, Hammond, Elshaboury 2019; 6
McDonald, Gerding, Johnson 2018; 66
Bajaj, Salzman, Acharya 2019; 70
Garza-González, Mendoza-Olazarán, Morfin-Otero 2019; 2019
Ramai, Zakhia, Fields 2021; 66
Hirsch, Saraiya, Poeth 2015; 15
Aroniadis, Brandt, Oneto 2019; 4
Bajaj, Heuman, Hylemon 2014; 60
Viechtbauer 2010; 36
Cammarota, Ianiro, Tilg 2017; 66
Quraishi, Widlak, Bhala 2017; 46
Halkjaer, Christensen, Lo 2018; 67
Kaito, Toya, Yoshifuji 2018; 2
Paramsothy, Kamm, Kaakoush 2017; 389
van Nood, Vrieze, Nieuwdorp 2013; 368
Huttner, Galperine, Kapel 2019; 25
Jiang, Jenq, Ajami 2018; 13
Mullish, Quraishi, Segal 2018; 67
Kao, Roach, Silva 2017; 318
Higgins, Thompson 2002; 21
DerSimonian, Kacker 2007; 28
Fang, Fu, Wang 2018; 2018
Allegretti, Kassam, Mullish 2020; 18
Ianiro, Maida, Burisch 2018; 6
Costello, Soo, Bryant 2017; 46
Cheminet, Kapel, Bleibtreu 2018; 100
Stollman, Smith, Giovanelli 2015; 110
Staley, Kaiser, Vaughn 2018; 6
DeFilipp, Peled, Li 2018; 2
Keller, Ooijevaar, Hvas 2021; 9
Kao, Roach, Walter 2019; 2
Lai, Sung, Cheng 2019; 49
Roggenbrod, Schuler, Haller 2019; 57
Du, Luo, Walsh 2021; 55
Steube, Vital, Grunert 2019; 13
de Groot, Scheithauer, Bakker 2020; 69
Allegretti, Kassam, Fischer 2019; 53
Ianiro, Eusebi, Black 2019; 50
Nishida, Inoue, Inatomi 2018; 11
Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff 2009; 6
Zuo, Wong, Lam 2018; 67
Bar-Yoseph, Carasso, Shklar 2021; 73
bibr41-17562848211041004
bibr87-17562848211041004
bibr39-17562848211041004
bibr13-17562848211041004
bibr9-17562848211041004
bibr26-17562848211041004
bibr3-17562848211041004
bibr20-17562848211041004
bibr14-17562848211041004
bibr34-17562848211041004
bibr4-17562848211041004
bibr61-17562848211041004
bibr67-17562848211041004
bibr74-17562848211041004
bibr47-17562848211041004
bibr54-17562848211041004
bibr81-17562848211041004
bibr80-17562848211041004
bibr35-17562848211041004
bibr70-17562848211041004
bibr45-17562848211041004
bibr25-17562848211041004
bibr15-17562848211041004
bibr50-17562848211041004
bibr55-17562848211041004
bibr60-17562848211041004
bibr65-17562848211041004
bibr40-17562848211041004
bibr30-17562848211041004
bibr56-17562848211041004
bibr85-17562848211041004
bibr5-17562848211041004
bibr46-17562848211041004
bibr66-17562848211041004
bibr76-17562848211041004
bibr86-17562848211041004
Zuo T (bibr75-17562848211041004) 2018; 67
bibr64-17562848211041004
bibr51-17562848211041004
bibr6-17562848211041004
bibr77-17562848211041004
bibr29-17562848211041004
Roggenbrod S (bibr21-17562848211041004) 2019; 57
Lachmund T (bibr19-17562848211041004) 2018; 23
bibr36-17562848211041004
bibr10-17562848211041004
bibr16-17562848211041004
bibr23-17562848211041004
bibr1-17562848211041004
Reigadas E (bibr48-17562848211041004) 2018; 31
bibr11-17562848211041004
bibr7-17562848211041004
bibr57-17562848211041004
bibr84-17562848211041004
bibr31-17562848211041004
bibr24-17562848211041004
bibr17-17562848211041004
bibr44-17562848211041004
bibr37-17562848211041004
bibr71-17562848211041004
bibr12-17562848211041004
bibr38-17562848211041004
bibr83-17562848211041004
bibr22-17562848211041004
bibr32-17562848211041004
bibr42-17562848211041004
bibr78-17562848211041004
bibr18-17562848211041004
bibr73-17562848211041004
bibr28-17562848211041004
bibr63-17562848211041004
bibr58-17562848211041004
bibr68-17562848211041004
Marcella C (bibr27-17562848211041004) 2021; 53
bibr88-17562848211041004
bibr8-17562848211041004
bibr72-17562848211041004
bibr69-17562848211041004
bibr33-17562848211041004
bibr79-17562848211041004
bibr43-17562848211041004
bibr82-17562848211041004
bibr53-17562848211041004
bibr59-17562848211041004
bibr62-17562848211041004
bibr52-17562848211041004
bibr49-17562848211041004
bibr2-17562848211041004
References_xml – volume: 69
  start-page: 502
  year: 2020
  end-page: 512
  article-title: Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 2
  start-page: 101
  year: 2019
  end-page: 102
  article-title: Effect of lyophilized sterile fecal filtrate vs lyophilized donor stool on recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI): preliminary results from a randomized, double-blind pilot study
  publication-title: J Can Assoc Gastroenterol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 191
  year: 2015
  article-title: Effectiveness of fecal-derived microbiota transfer using orally administered capsules for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: BMC Infect Dis
– volume: 66
  start-page: 987
  year: 2018
  end-page: 994
  article-title: Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
– volume: 30
  start-page: 730
  year: 2018
  end-page: 734
  article-title: Safety and efficacy of encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review
  publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 6
  year: 2019
  article-title: Recurrent relatively resistant Salmonella infantis infection in 2 immunocompromised hosts cleared with prolonged antibiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation
  publication-title: Open Forum Infect Dis
– volume: 312
  start-page: 1772
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1778
  article-title: Oral, capsulized, frozen fecal microbiota transplantation for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 162
  year: 2021
  article-title: The role of incretins on insulin function and glucose homeostasis
  publication-title: Endocrinology
– volume: 54
  start-page: 289
  year: 2019
  end-page: 296
  article-title: Multidonor FMT capsules improve symptoms and decrease fecal calprotectin in ulcerative colitis patients while treated – an open-label pilot study
  publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol
– volume: 97
  start-page: e11706
  year: 2018
  article-title: Case series of successful treatment with fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) oral capsules mixed from multiple donors even in patients previously treated with FMT enemas for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: Medicine
– volume: 41
  start-page: 835
  year: 2015
  end-page: 843
  article-title: Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy vs. vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 105
  start-page: 319
  year: 2020
  end-page: 324
  article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: experience with lyophilized oral capsules
  publication-title: J Hosp Infect
– volume: 6
  start-page: 166
  year: 2018
  article-title: Predicting recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection following encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation
  publication-title: Microbiome
– volume: 21
  start-page: 607
  year: 1950
  end-page: 611
  article-title: Transformations related to the angular and the square root
  publication-title: Ann Math Statist
– volume: 66
  start-page: 569
  year: 2017
  end-page: 580
  article-title: European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 70
  start-page: 1690
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1703
  article-title: Fecal microbial transplant capsules are safe in hepatic encephalopathy: a phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Hepatology
– volume: 8
  start-page: 318
  year: 2014
  end-page: 325
  article-title: Comparing disease activity indices in ulcerative colitis
  publication-title: J Crohns Colitis
– volume: 50
  start-page: 240
  year: 2019
  end-page: 248
  article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 2
  start-page: 3097
  year: 2018
  end-page: 3101
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation with frozen capsules for a patient with refractory acute gut graft-versus-host disease
  publication-title: Blood Adv
– volume: 9
  start-page: 47
  year: 2020
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Bacteroides fragilis is a potential marker of effective microbiota transplantation in acute graft-versus-host disease treatment
  publication-title: Cell Ther Transplant
– volume: 156
  start-page: 1324
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1332
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation is superior to fidaxomicin for treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 2018
  start-page: 8941340
  year: 2018
  article-title: Protocol for Fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Biomed Res Int
– volume: 49
  start-page: 1093
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1096
  article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation as a home therapy to frail older people
  publication-title: Age Ageing
– volume: 83
  start-page: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 14
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation improves metabolic syndrome parameters: systematic review with meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials
  publication-title: Nutr Res
– volume: 315
  start-page: 629
  year: 1997
  end-page: 634
  article-title: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1480
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1481
  article-title: Long-term multidonor faecal microbiota transfer by oral capsules for active ulcerative colitis
  publication-title: J Crohns Colitis
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 25
  article-title: Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of diseases other than Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Gut Microbes
– volume: 46
  start-page: 479
  year: 2017
  end-page: 493
  article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 17
  start-page: 791
  year: 2019
  end-page: 793
  article-title: Patients with cirrhosis require more fecal microbiota capsules to cure refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infections
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 100
  start-page: 148
  year: 2018
  end-page: 151
  article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation with frozen capsules for relapsing Clostridium difficile infections: the first experience from 15 consecutive patients in France
  publication-title: J Hosp Infect
– volume: 10
  year: 2019
  article-title: Durable long-term bacterial engraftment following encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation to treat Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: mBio
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Combined endoscopic and oral fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with antibiotic-dependent pouchitis: low clinical efficacy due to low donor microbial engraftment
  publication-title: Inflamm Intest Dis
– volume: 318
  start-page: 1985
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1993
  article-title: Effect of oral capsule- vs colonoscopy-delivered fecal microbiota transplantation on recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 28
  start-page: 105
  year: 2007
  end-page: 114
  article-title: Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update
  publication-title: Contemp Clin Trials
– volume: 2
  start-page: 745
  year: 2018
  end-page: 753
  article-title: Third-party fecal microbiota transplantation following allo-HCT reconstitutes microbiome diversity
  publication-title: Blood Adv
– volume: 389
  start-page: 1218
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1228
  article-title: Multidonor intensive faecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 57
  start-page: 296
  year: 2019
  end-page: 303
  article-title: Patient perception and approval of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an alternative treatment option for ulcerative colitis
  publication-title: Z Gastroenterol
– volume: 54
  start-page: 562
  year: 2011
  end-page: 572
  article-title: Characterization of fecal microbial communities in patients with liver cirrhosis
  publication-title: Hepatology
– volume: 66
  start-page: 369
  year: 2021
  end-page: 380
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with colonoscopy is superior to enema and nasogastric tube while comparable to capsule for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Dig Dis Sci
– volume: 49
  start-page: 537
  year: 2015
  end-page: 538
  article-title: Freeze-dried, capsulized fecal microbiota transplantation for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol
– volume: 25
  start-page: 958
  year: 2019
  end-page: 963
  article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for eradicating carriage of multidrug-resistant organisms: a systematic review
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect
– volume: 23
  start-page: 103
  year: 2018
  end-page: 104
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation: preferred route of application and concerns in German population-a survey
  publication-title: Helicobacter
– volume: 25
  start-page: 914
  year: 2019
  end-page: 915
  article-title: A five-day course of oral antibiotics followed by faecal transplantation to eradicate carriage of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect
– volume: 368
  start-page: 407
  year: 2013
  end-page: 415
  article-title: Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 2019
  start-page: 4549298
  year: 2019
  article-title: Intestinal microbiome changes in fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) vs. FMT enriched with Lactobacillus in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection
  publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 9
  start-page: 229
  year: 2021
  end-page: 247
  article-title: A standardised model for stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation: a consensus report from a multidisciplinary UEG working group
  publication-title: United European Gastroenterol J
– volume: 49
  start-page: 354
  year: 2019
  end-page: 363
  article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: review of donor features, procedures and outcomes in 168 clinical studies of faecal microbiota transplantation
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 53
  start-page: e405
  year: 2019
  end-page: e408
  article-title: Risk factors for gastrointestinal symptoms following successful eradication of Clostridium difficile by fecal microbiota transplantation
  publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package
  publication-title: J Stat Soft
– volume: 7
  start-page: 716
  year: 2019
  end-page: 722
  article-title: The impact of technical and clinical factors on fecal microbiota transfer outcomes for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections in Germany
  publication-title: United European Gastroenterol J
– volume: 45
  start-page: 222
  year: 2017
  end-page: 239
  article-title: Consensus report: faecal microbiota transfer – clinical applications and procedures
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 67
  start-page: 2107
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2115
  article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation alters gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: results from a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease
  publication-title: Clin J Gastroenterol
– volume: 64
  start-page: 2452
  year: 2019
  end-page: 2454
  article-title: Capsule-delivered fecal microbiota transplant is safe and well tolerated in patients with ulcerative colitis
  publication-title: Dig Dis Sci
– volume: 99
  start-page: e22129
  year: 2020
  article-title: Treatment of intestinal graft-versus-host disease with unrelated donor fecal microbiota transplantation capsules: a case report
  publication-title: Medicine
– volume: 321
  start-page: 156
  year: 2019
  end-page: 164
  article-title: Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on 8-week remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1672
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1678
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation capsules with targeted colonic versus gastric delivery in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a comparative cohort analysis of high and lose dose
  publication-title: Dig Dis Sci
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1920
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1941
  article-title: The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection and other potential indications: joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 152
  start-page: 799
  year: 2017
  end-page: 811
  article-title: Efficacy of sterile fecal filtrate transfer for treating patients with Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 313
  start-page: 398
  year: 2015
  end-page: 408
  article-title: Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 366
  start-page: l4898
  year: 2019
  article-title: RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1539
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1558
  article-title: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Stat Med
– volume: 110
  start-page: S933
  year: 2015
  end-page: S934
  article-title: The cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for managing multiply recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: examining the impact of universal stool banks and encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 10
  start-page: e00012
  year: 2019
  article-title: Alterations of gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome based on 16S rRNA-targeted sequencing: a systematic review
  publication-title: Clin Transl Gastroenterol
– volume: 110
  start-page: 600
  year: 2015
  end-page: 601
  article-title: Frozen encapsulated stool in recurrent Clostridium difficile: exploring the role of pills in the treatment hierarchy of fecal microbiota transplant nonresponders
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 29–30
  start-page: 100642
  year: 2020
  article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: EClinicalMedicine
– volume: 14
  start-page: 134
  year: 2016
  article-title: Oral, frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) capsules for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: BMC Med
– volume: 73
  start-page: e166
  year: 2021
  end-page: e175
  article-title: Oral capsulized fecal microbiota transplantation for eradication of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae colonization with a metagenomic perspective
  publication-title: Clin Infect Dis
– volume: 31
  start-page: 411
  year: 2018
  end-page: 418
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: experience, protocol, and results
  publication-title: Rev Esp Quimioter
– volume: 60
  start-page: 940
  year: 2014
  end-page: 947
  article-title: Altered profile of human gut microbiome is associated with cirrhosis and its complications
  publication-title: J Hepatol
– volume: 18
  start-page: 855
  year: 2020
  end-page: 863
  article-title: Effects of fecal microbiota transplantation with oral capsules in obese patients
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 67
  start-page: 634
  year: 2018
  end-page: 643
  article-title: Bacteriophage transfer during faecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection is associated with treatment outcome
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 55
  start-page: 300
  year: 2021
  end-page: 308
  article-title: Oral fecal microbiota transplant capsules are safe and effective for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol
– volume: 17
  start-page: e1003051
  year: 2020
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation for the improvement of metabolism in obesity: the FMT-TRIM double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial
  publication-title: PLoS Med
– volume: 42
  start-page: 71
  year: 2015
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Deviations in human gut microbiota: a novel diagnostic test for determining dysbiosis in patients with IBS or IBD
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 46
  start-page: 871
  year: 2018
  end-page: 874
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation in a kidney transplant recipient with recurrent urinary tract infection
  publication-title: Infection
– volume: 3
  year: 2016
  article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation by freeze-dried oral capsules for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection
  publication-title: Open Forum Infect Dis
– volume: 20
  start-page: 299
  year: 2020
  article-title: Effect of fecal microbiota transplant on symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review
  publication-title: BMC Psychiatry
– volume: 6
  start-page: e1000097
  year: 2009
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
  publication-title: PLoS Med
– volume: 46
  start-page: 213
  year: 2017
  end-page: 224
  article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal microbiota transplantation for the induction of remission for active ulcerative colitis
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 24
  start-page: 5403
  year: 2018
  end-page: 5414
  article-title: Five years of fecal microbiota transplantation – an update of the Israeli experience
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
– volume: 4
  start-page: 675
  year: 2019
  end-page: 685
  article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial
  publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1929
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1936
  article-title: Level of fecal calprotectin correlates with endoscopic and histologic Inflammation and identifies patients with mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 13
  start-page: e0205064
  year: 2018
  article-title: Safety and preliminary efficacy of orally administered lyophilized fecal microbiota product compared with frozen product given by enema for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1232
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1244
  article-title: Efficacy of different faecal microbiota transplantation protocols for Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: United European Gastroenterol J
– volume: 53
  start-page: 33
  year: 2021
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Systematic review: the global incidence of faecal microbiota transplantation-related adverse events from 2000 to 2020
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– ident: bibr35-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03
– ident: bibr46-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1177/2050640619839918
– ident: bibr1-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017
– ident: bibr57-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa737
– ident: bibr31-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729756
– volume: 67
  start-page: 634
  year: 2018
  ident: bibr75-17562848211041004
  publication-title: Gut
– ident: bibr3-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1177/2050640618780762
– ident: bibr56-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316434
– ident: bibr52-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000330
– ident: bibr4-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1111/apt.14201
– ident: bibr50-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0549-6
– ident: bibr64-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017731
– ident: bibr81-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1111/apt.13236
– ident: bibr65-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.18620/ctt-1866-8836-2020-9-2-47-59
– ident: bibr17-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318320
– volume: 53
  start-page: 33
  year: 2021
  ident: bibr27-17562848211041004
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/apt.16148
– ident: bibr9-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1111/apt.15116
– ident: bibr37-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001194
– ident: bibr47-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.038
– ident: bibr39-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.07.005
– ident: bibr43-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0930-z
– ident: bibr2-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1111/apt.13868
– ident: bibr51-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.81
– ident: bibr7-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1111/apt.13144
– ident: bibr5-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019
– ident: bibr44-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205064
– ident: bibr71-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1159/000497042
– volume: 31
  start-page: 411
  year: 2018
  ident: bibr48-17562848211041004
  publication-title: Rev Esp Quimioter
– ident: bibr80-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000012
– ident: bibr10-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316818
– ident: bibr53-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13875
– ident: bibr87-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1854640
– ident: bibr84-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1002/hep.24423
– volume: 57
  start-page: 296
  year: 2019
  ident: bibr21-17562848211041004
  publication-title: Z Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1055/a-0821-7166
– ident: bibr36-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5396-6
– ident: bibr13-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7
– volume: 23
  start-page: 103
  year: 2018
  ident: bibr19-17562848211041004
  publication-title: Helicobacter
– ident: bibr70-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1002/hep.30690
– ident: bibr82-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20046
– ident: bibr30-17562848211041004
– ident: bibr8-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100642
– ident: bibr11-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy149
– ident: bibr68-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.006
– ident: bibr72-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.038
– ident: bibr22-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001147
– ident: bibr60-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy334
– ident: bibr79-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1007/s12328-017-0813-5
– ident: bibr83-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30182-4
– ident: bibr34-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
– ident: bibr73-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.010
– ident: bibr76-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010
– ident: bibr26-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2020.06.018
– ident: bibr59-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.001
– ident: bibr62-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1585939
– ident: bibr29-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
– ident: bibr40-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1155/2019/4549298
– ident: bibr77-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1128/mBio.01586-19
– ident: bibr32-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
– ident: bibr45-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa073
– ident: bibr49-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.12.022
– ident: bibr63-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz073
– ident: bibr28-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103
– ident: bibr23-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001495
– ident: bibr16-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02654-5
– ident: bibr41-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i47.5403
– ident: bibr38-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011706
– ident: bibr86-17562848211041004
– ident: bibr61-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05596-5
– ident: bibr12-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17077
– ident: bibr55-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30198-0
– ident: bibr69-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003051
– ident: bibr74-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqab065
– ident: bibr24-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
– ident: bibr33-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004
– ident: bibr78-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz006.050
– ident: bibr15-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1111/apt.15330
– ident: bibr88-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1177/2050640620967898
– ident: bibr6-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037
– ident: bibr67-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022129
– ident: bibr58-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1190-9
– ident: bibr25-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1155/2018/8941340
– ident: bibr54-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0680-9
– ident: bibr42-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw091
– ident: bibr14-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1111/apt.14173
– ident: bibr18-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.006
– ident: bibr20-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.14309/00000434-201510001-02248
– ident: bibr66-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024968
– ident: bibr85-17562848211041004
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.019
SSID ssj0062739
Score 2.3348095
Snippet Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied...
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases....
Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied...
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
sage
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 17562848211041004
SubjectTerms Antibiotics
Disease
Gastroenterology
Infections
Meta-Analysis
Microbiota
Microorganisms
Systematic review
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ1Na9ZAEIAX6aF4Ea1f0VZWEAQhmOxXEm9VLEXQixZ6C5PsLBbepkVTxJv_wX_oL3Fmd9_Yl_px8ZrswrAzuzOzH88I8UR5H1qvbclltkvKv0wJTRNK6Awy7cT5IdI-37nDI_Pm2B5fKvXFd8ISHjgN3POqG-xYhdG1oI2tPcXnXYPV0A6jxtoOvPqSz1snU2kNduSUu3yGyXgl8pGO1uGWsx3DjLQNLxRh_b-LMK9elLx02ys6oIOb4kaOHOV-kviWuIbTjth-m8_Gb4sv7xcos0wPUiRvsspTnKGEzB55IckqgTLjFcWYXgZA0pE8PUk4phnkHGHnK0gvkib549t3ibnyqKQAV66fUkpk-ASMX--Io4PXH14dlrmsQjlareZy0IazGAUagyYVetQObMNv9Rn-3pKGdK0GrDxW6GiOgqIFPXgNXlnftvqu2JrOJrwvpPdQ22AMtVVmDB10oyMN2aCxM4BVIar1MPdjZo5z6YtVX2fM-BXNFOLZ0uU8ATf-1vgl625pyKzs-IEsqM8W1P_Lggqxu9Z8nyfw554SS63iplghHi-_aerxeQpMeHZBbazrOF5WqhD3kqEskmhKe41RJGGzYUIbom7-mU4-Rrx3a8h7cc-nbGy_RPrjKDz4H6PwUFxXfF0n7i7tiq350wXuUbw1D4_i1PoJD8oltQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
  dbid: AFRWT
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1ba9VAEF7qKYgv4t3UKisIgrA22VuyvkgVD0XQB22xb2Gzu9HCOTlScyh98z_4D_0lzmw20UOr-JpMyLA7s3Pb-YaQJ9z7tvJCMRyzzSD-ksyWZcuskQHRTrRvItrne31wJN8eq-Mtshp7YdIKfnuO16qAo3hYo3ZjNnovFRn3wOZpOFcrjF4kYp69XPfLekh3j1M18AnWp9dLLG07vBB5zsb2titkm5da8RnZ3p9_-HQ4Ht4arLmJPZRKM_xDKoRe-tMNUxYR_y9zUy_etvzjyli0YvMb5HpyP-n-IC83yVbobpGr71KB_TY5-zghO9Ohq4VippYuQ2-ZTQAmLyiItoXwegGOqqetDbDRdHkyYDr1lvYRMX1hh7amjv78_oOGNL6UgpdMx35MGhDBwrrzO-Ro_ubw9QFLsxmYU4L3rBESQyFuRWgFyIEPQltVYsM_IshXsM2i4E3IfciDBkW3HKxC64X1XPmqEnfJrFt14T6h3ttCtVICLZeuNdY47Y1RrQhG2pBnJB-XuXYJuBznZyzqImGVX9iZjDybPvk6oHb8i_gV7t1EiIDb8cHq9HOd9LfOTaNc3jpdWSFVAfxpU4a8qRonQqGajOyOO1-PMlxDdCp4zKxl5PH0GvQXizK2C6s10Cht0OnmPCP3BkGZOBEQO0vJgcNyQ4Q2WN180518iRjhlQQTiF8-RWH7zdJfV2HnvykfkGscL_bEPNQumfWn6_AQPLO-eZS06RfmxTJ6
  priority: 102
  providerName: SAGE Publications
Title Systematic review with meta-analysis: encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation – evidence for clinical efficacy
URI https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17562848211041004
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34484424
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2613283540
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2569615322
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8414624
https://doaj.org/article/09b5c0fc68a3451d99697e0b8bc3e15b
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1baxUxEA7agvgi3t1aDxEEQQju5rYbX6SVHopgkdrieVuym6QWTvfUdkvxzf_gP_SXOJPN2Xqo9mkhF5jNzCQzk8w3hLzizoXKCcWwzDYD_0syW5aBWSM9op1o10S0zz29eyg_ztQsBdzO07PK5Z4YN2q3aDFG_hYsfcFjlOL96XeGVaPwdjWV0LhN1hG6DKW6nI0Ol4aj2cSESKUZzJ2lW00EXMI22Jkr9H8koqatnEsRvv9fNuf1p5N_vf-KR9L0PrmXbEm6NTD_Abnlu4fkzqd0W_6IXH4ZYZrpkKJCMexKT3xvmU1oJO8oyKkFX3kOVqejwXrgGj05HgCaekv7CH8-t0OOUkd___xFfapFSsHkpcvkSuoRjsK2Px6Tw-nOwYddlgotsFYJ3rNGSPRruBU-CGCq80JbVWL2PsLBV8AzUfDG587nXoPWWg5bfHDCOq5cVYknZK1bdP4Zoc7ZQgUpYSyXbTDWtNoZo4LwRlqfZyRfLnPdJhRyLIYxr4sEPH6NMxl5M045HSA4bhq8jbwbByJ6dmxYnB3VSRnr3DSqzUOrKyukKoA-bUqfN1XTCl-oJiObS87XSaXP6ysBzMjLsRuUEW9YbOcXFzBGaYMWNOcZeToIykiJAEdYSg4UlisitELqak93_C0CflcSzjOc-RqF7Yqk_67Cxs0_8Jzc5fg0J0aSNslaf3bhX4Bt1TeTqEATsr413f96AN_tnb3P-5MYqfgDIbUjPw
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3LbtUwELVKkaAbxJsLBYwEQkKySPxKjIQQr-qWPja00t2lTuzQSre5pU1Vdcc_8B98FF_CjOOkXBW66zZxoklmxnPG9pwh5Dl3rs6dUAzbbDPIvySzWVYza6RHthPtysD2uanH2_LLRE0WyK--FgaPVfZzYpio3azCNfLXgPQFD6sU7w6-M-wahburfQuNzizW_OkJpGxHb1c_gX5fcL7yeevjmMWuAqxSgresFBJBPLfC1wK-wHmhrcqwVB25z3MQUKS89InziddgopbDfFY7YR1XLs8FvPcKuQqBN8FkL5sMCZ4GKGBCAabSDGSdxF1UJHjCaxAJcsy3JLK0zcXB0C7gXxj3_FHNv86bhRC4cpPciNiVvu-M7RZZ8M1tcm0j7s7fISdfB1po2pXEUFzmpfu-tcxG9pM3FPzCQm4-BZTraG09WAnd3-sIoVpL20C3PrVdTVRDf__4SX3sfUoBYtO-mJN6pL-w1eldsn0pKrhHFptZ4x8Q6pxNVS0ljOWyqo01lXbGqFp4I61PRiTpf3NRRdZzbL4xLdJIdH5OMyPyanjkoKP8uGjwB9TdMBDZusOF2eG3Ijp_kZhSVUld6dwKqVKQT5vMJ2VeVsKnqhyR5V7zRZxCjoozgx-RZ8NtcH7c0bGNnx3DGKUNInbOR-R-ZyiDJAISbyk5SJjNmdCcqPN3mr3dQDCeS4if-ORLNLYzkf77Fx5e_AFPyfXx1sZ6sb66ufaILHE8FhRWsZbJYnt47B8DrmvLJ8GZKNm5bO_9A8nBWwo
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1baxUxEA5yCsUX8e5q1QiCIMTu5rYb3-rlUG9FtMW-LdlNUgune0rdIr75H_yH_hJnstnVQ6v4upksQ2YmM5PJfCHkIXcuVE4ohs9sM8i_JLNlGZg10iPaiXZNRPvc0dt78vW-2k8HbtgLk1bwyxO8VgUcxc0arfvYhc1UY9wEl6dhW60weZFFhANdkxKSvBlZ25p_-LQ77sUanLOJLZFKM5yR6prn_mTFM0UA__OizrOXJ_-4ARad0vwyuZSiSbo1iP8KueC7q2T9XaqXXyNfP05AzXRoUqF48EqPfG-ZTXgkTyloqoVseQFxp6PBepAbPTocIJp6S_sIgL6wQ5dSR39-_0F9eo2UQtBLx_ZK6hGQwrbfrpO9-cvd59ssPbXAWiV4zxohMbPhVvggQKzOC21Vif37CAhfgdREwRufO597DXZrOWzywQnruHJVJW6QWbfs_C1CnbOFClICLZdtMNa02hmjgvBGWp9nJB-XuW4TDjk-h7GoiwQ9fkYyGXk8TTkeQDj-RfwMZTcRIn52_LA8OaiTOda5aVSbh1ZXVkhVAH_alD5vqqYVvlBNRjZGydejStaQbAoeD8oy8mAaBnPEGovt_PIUaJQ2GENznpGbg6JMnAhIhaXkwGG5okIrrK6OdIefI-R3JcGj4cxHqGy_WfrrKtz-b8r7ZP39i3n99tXOmzvkIscrO_GEaYPM-pNTfxdirr65lwzrF6XeIPM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic+review+with+meta-analysis%3A+encapsulated+faecal+microbiota+transplantation+%E2%80%93+evidence+for+clinical+efficacy&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic+advances+in+gastroenterology&rft.au=Cold%2C+Frederik&rft.au=Baunwall%2C+Simon+Mark+Dahl&rft.au=Dahlerup%2C+Jens+Frederik&rft.au=Petersen%2C+Andreas+Munk&rft.date=2021&rft.issn=1756-2848&rft.eissn=1756-2848&rft.volume=14&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F17562848211041004&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_17562848211041004
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1756-2848&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1756-2848&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1756-2848&client=summon