Systematic review with meta-analysis: encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation – evidence for clinical efficacy
Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. Methods: A systemati...
Saved in:
Published in | Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology Vol. 14; p. 17562848211041004 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
2021
Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background:
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes.
Methods:
A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression.
Results:
A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported.
Conclusions:
Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results.
Plain Language Summary
Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy
The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects.
Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years.
Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction.
Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings:
-Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed.
-The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment.
-Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection.
-The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered.
-Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment.
-There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent
infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes.
A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression.
A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (
= 18, 51%) and patients (
= 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported.
Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results.
The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects.Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years.Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction.Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings:-Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed.-The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent
infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment.-Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of
infection.-The treatment is effective in the treatment of
infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered.-Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment.-There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression. Results: A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported. Conclusions: Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results. Plain Language Summary Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects. Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years. Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction. Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings: -Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed. -The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment. -Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection. -The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered. -Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment. -There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes.BACKGROUNDFaecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes.A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression.METHODSA systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression.A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported.RESULTSA total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported.Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results.CONCLUSIONSEncapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results.Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects.Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years.Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction.Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings:-Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed.-The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment.-Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection.-The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered.-Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment.-There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYTransfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects.Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years.Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction.Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings:-Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed.-The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment.-Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection.-The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered.-Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment.-There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression. Results: A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies ( n = 18, 51%) and patients ( n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported. Conclusions: Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results. Plain Language Summary Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects. Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years. Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction. Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings: -Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed. -The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment. -Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection. -The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered. -Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment. -There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria. |
Author | Cold, Frederik Hvas, Christian Lodberg Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg Dahlerup, Jens Frederik Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl Petersen, Andreas Munk |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Frederik orcidid: 0000-0003-2085-8496 surname: Cold fullname: Cold, Frederik email: frederik.cold@regionh.dk organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Aleris-Hamlet Hospitals, Copenhagen, Søborg, Denmark – sequence: 2 givenname: Simon Mark Dahl orcidid: 0000-0002-5135-7435 surname: Baunwall fullname: Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl organization: Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark – sequence: 3 givenname: Jens Frederik surname: Dahlerup fullname: Dahlerup, Jens Frederik organization: Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark – sequence: 4 givenname: Andreas Munk surname: Petersen fullname: Petersen, Andreas Munk organization: Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark – sequence: 5 givenname: Christian Lodberg surname: Hvas fullname: Hvas, Christian Lodberg organization: Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark – sequence: 6 givenname: Lars Hestbjerg surname: Hansen fullname: Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg organization: Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen University, Frederiksberg, Denmark |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34484424$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kstu1TAQhiNURC_wAGyQJTZsUnyPwwIJVVwqVWIBrK2JMzn1URIf7KRHZ8c78IY8CT6klLYIVmON___T_B4fFwdjGLEonjJ6ylhVvWSV0txIwxmjklEqHxRH-165bx7cOh8WxymtKdW8EvWj4lBIaaTk8qjYftqlCQeYvCMRrzxuydZPl2TACUoYod8ln14RHB1s0tzDhC3pAB30ZPAuhsaHCcgUYUybHsYpg8JIfnz7TjKszTYkXYjE9X70exN2Xa5u97h42EGf8Ml1PSm-vHv7-exDefHx_fnZm4vSKcGnshFSc005COxEg65FoUFVOa3ivKamkkYw3iBtkaJWggHHhnWtgJar1hhxUpwv3DbA2m6iHyDubABvfzVCXFmIOXyPltaNcrRz2oCQirV1resKaWMaJ5CpJrNeL6zN3AzYOhxz7v4O9O7N6C_tKlxZI1mOITPgxTUghq8zpskOPjns88NhmJPlStea5eA8S5_fk67DHPM-skozwY1QkmbVs9sT3Yzye79ZwBZBXlVKEbsbCaN2_4fsX38oe6p7HueXveZQvv-v83RxJljhn4H_bfgJV03ZGw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_09_008 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v29_i20_3185 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1286429 crossref_primary_10_1136_egastro_2024_100099 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2023_1114798 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848251314820 crossref_primary_10_20517_mrr_2023_80 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csbj_2022_01_009 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12050868 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14183726 crossref_primary_10_3390_ph15111398 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14232635 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_41182_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinf_2024_106216 crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11203272 crossref_primary_10_36488_cmac_2022_4_308_313 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14122528 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_959856 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17642 crossref_primary_10_1136_dtb_2022_000056 crossref_primary_10_1136_dtb_2023_000003 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848241289065 |
Cites_doi | 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 10.1177/2050640619839918 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017 10.1093/cid/ciaa737 10.1214/aoms/1177729756 10.1177/2050640618780762 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316434 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000330 10.1111/apt.14201 10.1186/s40168-018-0549-6 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017731 10.1111/apt.13236 10.18620/ctt-1866-8836-2020-9-2-47-59 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318320 10.1111/apt.16148 10.1111/apt.15116 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001194 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.038 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.07.005 10.1186/s12879-015-0930-z 10.1111/apt.13868 10.1038/ajg.2015.81 10.1111/apt.13144 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019 10.1371/journal.pone.0205064 10.1159/000497042 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000012 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316818 10.1001/jama.2014.13875 10.1080/19490976.2020.1854640 10.1002/hep.24423 10.1055/a-0821-7166 10.1007/s10620-018-5396-6 10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7 10.1002/hep.30690 10.1001/jama.2018.20046 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100642 10.1093/cid/ciy149 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.006 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.038 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001147 10.1093/ofid/ofy334 10.1007/s12328-017-0813-5 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30182-4 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.010 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010 10.1016/j.nutres.2020.06.018 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.001 10.1080/00365521.2019.1585939 10.1136/bmj.l4898 10.1155/2019/4549298 10.1128/mBio.01586-19 10.1002/sim.1186 10.1093/ageing/afaa073 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.12.022 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz073 10.1001/jama.2014.17103 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001495 10.1186/s12888-020-02654-5 10.3748/wjg.v24.i47.5403 10.1097/MD.0000000000011706 10.1007/s10620-019-05596-5 10.1001/jama.2017.17077 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30198-0 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003051 10.1210/endocr/bqab065 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004 10.1093/jcag/gwz006.050 10.1111/apt.15330 10.1177/2050640620967898 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037 10.1097/MD.0000000000022129 10.1007/s15010-018-1190-9 10.1155/2018/8941340 10.1186/s12916-016-0680-9 10.1093/ofid/ofw091 10.1111/apt.14173 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.006 10.14309/00000434-201510001-02248 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024968 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.019 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s), 2021 The Author(s), 2021. The Author(s), 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s), 2021 2021 SAGE Publications Ltd unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), 2021 – notice: The Author(s), 2021. – notice: The Author(s), 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s), 2021 2021 SAGE Publications Ltd unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses |
DBID | AFRWT AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1177/17562848211041004 |
DatabaseName | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection (NC LIVE) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: AFRWT name: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 4 dbid: 7X7 name: Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1756-2848 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_09b5c0fc68a3451d99697e0b8bc3e15b PMC8414624 34484424 10_1177_17562848211041004 10.1177_17562848211041004 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: innovationsfonden grantid: 7076-00129B, MICROHEALTH funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100012774 – fundername: innovationsfonden grantid: 8056-00006B, CEFTA funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100012774 – fundername: ; grantid: 8056-00006B, CEFTA – fundername: ; grantid: 7076-00129B, MICROHEALTH |
GroupedDBID | --- -TM 01A 0R~ 123 18M 29Q 4.4 53G 54M 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AABMB AADUE AAJQC AAKDD AAQDB AARDL AARIX AASGM ABAWP ABEIX ABFWQ ABJIS ABKRH ABQXT ABRHV ABUWG ABVFX ACARO ACDSZ ACDXX ACGFS ACOFE ACROE ACRPL ADBBV ADEBD ADNMO ADOGD ADYCS ADZZY AENEX AEQLS AERKM AEUHG AEWDL AEXNY AFCOW AFEET AFKRA AFKRG AFRWT AFUIA AFWMB AGNHF AGQPQ AHHFK AJUZI ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS ARTOV ASPBG AUVAJ AVWKF AZFZN B8M BAWUL BCNDV BDDNI BENPR BKSCU BPHCQ BSEHC BVXVI CAG CCPQU CDWPY CFDXU COF CS3 DC- DC. DIK DOPDO E3Z EBS EJD EMOBN F5P FEDTE FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION GX1 H13 HF~ HMCUK HVGLF HYE HZ~ J8X K.F N9A O9- OK1 P.B PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ ROL RPM S01 SAUOL SCDPB SCNPE SFC UKHRP ZONMY ZPPRI ZRKOI ZSSAH AAYXX ACHEB CITATION 31X AADTT AATBZ ACGZU ACSBE ACSIQ AEUIJ AEWHI B8Z DV7 M4V NPM SGV 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-b3462602a3ef3becde36a57041522908748312be0de0e6531a2eb1fd3ad25d883 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1756-2848 1756-283X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:11 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 17:50:00 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:55:12 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 12:17:38 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:55:28 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:27:46 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:08 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:28:11 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | faecal microbiota transplantation encapsulated meta-analysis Clostridioides difficile ulcerative colitis capsules systematic review lyophilisation microbiome |
Language | English |
License | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). The Author(s), 2021. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c532t-b3462602a3ef3becde36a57041522908748312be0de0e6531a2eb1fd3ad25d883 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-2085-8496 0000-0002-5135-7435 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2613283540?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 34484424 |
PQID | 2613283540 |
PQPubID | 4450843 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_09b5c0fc68a3451d99697e0b8bc3e15b pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8414624 proquest_miscellaneous_2569615322 proquest_journals_2613283540 pubmed_primary_34484424 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848211041004 crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_17562848211041004 sage_journals_10_1177_17562848211041004 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2021 text: 2021-00-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London, England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London, England – name: England – name: London – name: Sage UK: London, England |
PublicationTitle | Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Therap Adv Gastroenterol |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: Sage Publications Ltd – name: SAGE Publishing |
References | Konig, Siebenhaar, Hogenauer 2017; 45 Reigadas, Olmedo, Valerio 2018; 31 Ott, Waetzig, Rehman 2017; 152 Youngster, Russell, Pindar 2014; 312 Hvas, Dahl Jorgensen, Jorgensen 2019; 156 Casen, Vebo, Sekelja 2015; 42 Holst, Gasbjerg, Rosenkilde 2021; 162 Duan, Zhu, Wang 2019; 10 Iqbal, Anwar, Karim 2018; 30 Mao, Jiang, Sun 2020; 99 Cold, Browne, Gunther 2019; 54 Cammarota, Masucci, Ianiro 2015; 41 Chinna Meyyappan, Forth, Wallace 2020; 20 Marcella, Cui, Kelly 2021; 53 Proença, Allegretti, Bernardo 2020; 83 Baunwall, Lee, Eriksen 2020; 29–30 Freeman, Tukey 1950; 21 Theede, Holck, Ibsen 2015; 13 Allegretti, Fischer, Sagi 2019; 64 Tian, Ding, Gong 2015; 49 Yu, Gao, Stastka 2020; 17 Chen, Yang, Lu 2011; 54 Kassam, Fridman, Burgess 2015; 110 Jørgensen, Rubak, Damsgaard 2020; 49 Walsh, Ghosh, Brain 2014; 8 Reigadas, Bouza, Olmedo 2020; 105 Biehl, Cruz Aguilar, Farowski 2018; 46 Saha, Tariq, Tosh 2019; 25 Adler, Tabaa, Kassam 2019; 64 Costello, Hughes, Waters 2019; 321 Egger, Davey Smith, Schneider 1997; 315 Staley, Kaiser, Vaughn 2019; 10 Greenberg, Youngster, Cohen 2018; 24 Youngster, Mahabamunuge, Systrom 2016; 14 Sterne, Savovicá, Page 2019; 366 Lachmund, Von Arnim, Canbay 2018; 23 Bagdasarian, Rao, Malani 2015; 313 Goloshchapov, Bakin, Kucher 2020; 9 Green, Davis, Berk 2020; 12 Chehri, Christensen, Halkjaer 2018; 97 Herfarth, Barnes, Long 2019; 4 Hecker, Obrenovich, Cadnum 2016; 3 Peri, Aguilar, Tüffers 2019; 7 Pringle, Soto, Chung 2019; 17 Torres Soto, Hammond, Elshaboury 2019; 6 McDonald, Gerding, Johnson 2018; 66 Bajaj, Salzman, Acharya 2019; 70 Garza-González, Mendoza-Olazarán, Morfin-Otero 2019; 2019 Ramai, Zakhia, Fields 2021; 66 Hirsch, Saraiya, Poeth 2015; 15 Aroniadis, Brandt, Oneto 2019; 4 Bajaj, Heuman, Hylemon 2014; 60 Viechtbauer 2010; 36 Cammarota, Ianiro, Tilg 2017; 66 Quraishi, Widlak, Bhala 2017; 46 Halkjaer, Christensen, Lo 2018; 67 Kaito, Toya, Yoshifuji 2018; 2 Paramsothy, Kamm, Kaakoush 2017; 389 van Nood, Vrieze, Nieuwdorp 2013; 368 Huttner, Galperine, Kapel 2019; 25 Jiang, Jenq, Ajami 2018; 13 Mullish, Quraishi, Segal 2018; 67 Kao, Roach, Silva 2017; 318 Higgins, Thompson 2002; 21 DerSimonian, Kacker 2007; 28 Fang, Fu, Wang 2018; 2018 Allegretti, Kassam, Mullish 2020; 18 Ianiro, Maida, Burisch 2018; 6 Costello, Soo, Bryant 2017; 46 Cheminet, Kapel, Bleibtreu 2018; 100 Stollman, Smith, Giovanelli 2015; 110 Staley, Kaiser, Vaughn 2018; 6 DeFilipp, Peled, Li 2018; 2 Keller, Ooijevaar, Hvas 2021; 9 Kao, Roach, Walter 2019; 2 Lai, Sung, Cheng 2019; 49 Roggenbrod, Schuler, Haller 2019; 57 Du, Luo, Walsh 2021; 55 Steube, Vital, Grunert 2019; 13 de Groot, Scheithauer, Bakker 2020; 69 Allegretti, Kassam, Fischer 2019; 53 Ianiro, Eusebi, Black 2019; 50 Nishida, Inoue, Inatomi 2018; 11 Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff 2009; 6 Zuo, Wong, Lam 2018; 67 Bar-Yoseph, Carasso, Shklar 2021; 73 bibr41-17562848211041004 bibr87-17562848211041004 bibr39-17562848211041004 bibr13-17562848211041004 bibr9-17562848211041004 bibr26-17562848211041004 bibr3-17562848211041004 bibr20-17562848211041004 bibr14-17562848211041004 bibr34-17562848211041004 bibr4-17562848211041004 bibr61-17562848211041004 bibr67-17562848211041004 bibr74-17562848211041004 bibr47-17562848211041004 bibr54-17562848211041004 bibr81-17562848211041004 bibr80-17562848211041004 bibr35-17562848211041004 bibr70-17562848211041004 bibr45-17562848211041004 bibr25-17562848211041004 bibr15-17562848211041004 bibr50-17562848211041004 bibr55-17562848211041004 bibr60-17562848211041004 bibr65-17562848211041004 bibr40-17562848211041004 bibr30-17562848211041004 bibr56-17562848211041004 bibr85-17562848211041004 bibr5-17562848211041004 bibr46-17562848211041004 bibr66-17562848211041004 bibr76-17562848211041004 bibr86-17562848211041004 Zuo T (bibr75-17562848211041004) 2018; 67 bibr64-17562848211041004 bibr51-17562848211041004 bibr6-17562848211041004 bibr77-17562848211041004 bibr29-17562848211041004 Roggenbrod S (bibr21-17562848211041004) 2019; 57 Lachmund T (bibr19-17562848211041004) 2018; 23 bibr36-17562848211041004 bibr10-17562848211041004 bibr16-17562848211041004 bibr23-17562848211041004 bibr1-17562848211041004 Reigadas E (bibr48-17562848211041004) 2018; 31 bibr11-17562848211041004 bibr7-17562848211041004 bibr57-17562848211041004 bibr84-17562848211041004 bibr31-17562848211041004 bibr24-17562848211041004 bibr17-17562848211041004 bibr44-17562848211041004 bibr37-17562848211041004 bibr71-17562848211041004 bibr12-17562848211041004 bibr38-17562848211041004 bibr83-17562848211041004 bibr22-17562848211041004 bibr32-17562848211041004 bibr42-17562848211041004 bibr78-17562848211041004 bibr18-17562848211041004 bibr73-17562848211041004 bibr28-17562848211041004 bibr63-17562848211041004 bibr58-17562848211041004 bibr68-17562848211041004 Marcella C (bibr27-17562848211041004) 2021; 53 bibr88-17562848211041004 bibr8-17562848211041004 bibr72-17562848211041004 bibr69-17562848211041004 bibr33-17562848211041004 bibr79-17562848211041004 bibr43-17562848211041004 bibr82-17562848211041004 bibr53-17562848211041004 bibr59-17562848211041004 bibr62-17562848211041004 bibr52-17562848211041004 bibr49-17562848211041004 bibr2-17562848211041004 |
References_xml | – volume: 69 start-page: 502 year: 2020 end-page: 512 article-title: Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time publication-title: Gut – volume: 2 start-page: 101 year: 2019 end-page: 102 article-title: Effect of lyophilized sterile fecal filtrate vs lyophilized donor stool on recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI): preliminary results from a randomized, double-blind pilot study publication-title: J Can Assoc Gastroenterol – volume: 15 start-page: 191 year: 2015 article-title: Effectiveness of fecal-derived microbiota transfer using orally administered capsules for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: BMC Infect Dis – volume: 66 start-page: 987 year: 2018 end-page: 994 article-title: Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America publication-title: Clin Infect Dis – volume: 30 start-page: 730 year: 2018 end-page: 734 article-title: Safety and efficacy of encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 6 year: 2019 article-title: Recurrent relatively resistant Salmonella infantis infection in 2 immunocompromised hosts cleared with prolonged antibiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation publication-title: Open Forum Infect Dis – volume: 312 start-page: 1772 year: 2014 end-page: 1778 article-title: Oral, capsulized, frozen fecal microbiota transplantation for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: JAMA – volume: 162 year: 2021 article-title: The role of incretins on insulin function and glucose homeostasis publication-title: Endocrinology – volume: 54 start-page: 289 year: 2019 end-page: 296 article-title: Multidonor FMT capsules improve symptoms and decrease fecal calprotectin in ulcerative colitis patients while treated – an open-label pilot study publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol – volume: 97 start-page: e11706 year: 2018 article-title: Case series of successful treatment with fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) oral capsules mixed from multiple donors even in patients previously treated with FMT enemas for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: Medicine – volume: 41 start-page: 835 year: 2015 end-page: 843 article-title: Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy vs. vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 105 start-page: 319 year: 2020 end-page: 324 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: experience with lyophilized oral capsules publication-title: J Hosp Infect – volume: 6 start-page: 166 year: 2018 article-title: Predicting recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection following encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation publication-title: Microbiome – volume: 21 start-page: 607 year: 1950 end-page: 611 article-title: Transformations related to the angular and the square root publication-title: Ann Math Statist – volume: 66 start-page: 569 year: 2017 end-page: 580 article-title: European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice publication-title: Gut – volume: 70 start-page: 1690 year: 2019 end-page: 1703 article-title: Fecal microbial transplant capsules are safe in hepatic encephalopathy: a phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled trial publication-title: Hepatology – volume: 8 start-page: 318 year: 2014 end-page: 325 article-title: Comparing disease activity indices in ulcerative colitis publication-title: J Crohns Colitis – volume: 50 start-page: 240 year: 2019 end-page: 248 article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 2 start-page: 3097 year: 2018 end-page: 3101 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation with frozen capsules for a patient with refractory acute gut graft-versus-host disease publication-title: Blood Adv – volume: 9 start-page: 47 year: 2020 end-page: 59 article-title: Bacteroides fragilis is a potential marker of effective microbiota transplantation in acute graft-versus-host disease treatment publication-title: Cell Ther Transplant – volume: 156 start-page: 1324 year: 2019 end-page: 1332 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation is superior to fidaxomicin for treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 2018 start-page: 8941340 year: 2018 article-title: Protocol for Fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Biomed Res Int – volume: 49 start-page: 1093 year: 2020 end-page: 1096 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation as a home therapy to frail older people publication-title: Age Ageing – volume: 83 start-page: 1 year: 2020 end-page: 14 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation improves metabolic syndrome parameters: systematic review with meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials publication-title: Nutr Res – volume: 315 start-page: 629 year: 1997 end-page: 634 article-title: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test publication-title: BMJ – volume: 13 start-page: 1480 year: 2019 end-page: 1481 article-title: Long-term multidonor faecal microbiota transfer by oral capsules for active ulcerative colitis publication-title: J Crohns Colitis – volume: 12 start-page: 1 year: 2020 end-page: 25 article-title: Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of diseases other than Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Gut Microbes – volume: 46 start-page: 479 year: 2017 end-page: 493 article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 17 start-page: 791 year: 2019 end-page: 793 article-title: Patients with cirrhosis require more fecal microbiota capsules to cure refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infections publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 100 start-page: 148 year: 2018 end-page: 151 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation with frozen capsules for relapsing Clostridium difficile infections: the first experience from 15 consecutive patients in France publication-title: J Hosp Infect – volume: 10 year: 2019 article-title: Durable long-term bacterial engraftment following encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation to treat Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: mBio – volume: 4 start-page: 1 year: 2019 end-page: 6 article-title: Combined endoscopic and oral fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with antibiotic-dependent pouchitis: low clinical efficacy due to low donor microbial engraftment publication-title: Inflamm Intest Dis – volume: 318 start-page: 1985 year: 2017 end-page: 1993 article-title: Effect of oral capsule- vs colonoscopy-delivered fecal microbiota transplantation on recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: JAMA – volume: 28 start-page: 105 year: 2007 end-page: 114 article-title: Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update publication-title: Contemp Clin Trials – volume: 2 start-page: 745 year: 2018 end-page: 753 article-title: Third-party fecal microbiota transplantation following allo-HCT reconstitutes microbiome diversity publication-title: Blood Adv – volume: 389 start-page: 1218 year: 2017 end-page: 1228 article-title: Multidonor intensive faecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial publication-title: Lancet – volume: 57 start-page: 296 year: 2019 end-page: 303 article-title: Patient perception and approval of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an alternative treatment option for ulcerative colitis publication-title: Z Gastroenterol – volume: 54 start-page: 562 year: 2011 end-page: 572 article-title: Characterization of fecal microbial communities in patients with liver cirrhosis publication-title: Hepatology – volume: 66 start-page: 369 year: 2021 end-page: 380 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with colonoscopy is superior to enema and nasogastric tube while comparable to capsule for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Dig Dis Sci – volume: 49 start-page: 537 year: 2015 end-page: 538 article-title: Freeze-dried, capsulized fecal microbiota transplantation for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol – volume: 25 start-page: 958 year: 2019 end-page: 963 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for eradicating carriage of multidrug-resistant organisms: a systematic review publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect – volume: 23 start-page: 103 year: 2018 end-page: 104 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation: preferred route of application and concerns in German population-a survey publication-title: Helicobacter – volume: 25 start-page: 914 year: 2019 end-page: 915 article-title: A five-day course of oral antibiotics followed by faecal transplantation to eradicate carriage of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect – volume: 368 start-page: 407 year: 2013 end-page: 415 article-title: Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 2019 start-page: 4549298 year: 2019 article-title: Intestinal microbiome changes in fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) vs. FMT enriched with Lactobacillus in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 9 start-page: 229 year: 2021 end-page: 247 article-title: A standardised model for stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation: a consensus report from a multidisciplinary UEG working group publication-title: United European Gastroenterol J – volume: 49 start-page: 354 year: 2019 end-page: 363 article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: review of donor features, procedures and outcomes in 168 clinical studies of faecal microbiota transplantation publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 53 start-page: e405 year: 2019 end-page: e408 article-title: Risk factors for gastrointestinal symptoms following successful eradication of Clostridium difficile by fecal microbiota transplantation publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol – volume: 36 start-page: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 48 article-title: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package publication-title: J Stat Soft – volume: 7 start-page: 716 year: 2019 end-page: 722 article-title: The impact of technical and clinical factors on fecal microbiota transfer outcomes for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections in Germany publication-title: United European Gastroenterol J – volume: 45 start-page: 222 year: 2017 end-page: 239 article-title: Consensus report: faecal microbiota transfer – clinical applications and procedures publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 67 start-page: 2107 year: 2018 end-page: 2115 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation alters gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: results from a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study publication-title: Gut – volume: 11 start-page: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 10 article-title: Gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease publication-title: Clin J Gastroenterol – volume: 64 start-page: 2452 year: 2019 end-page: 2454 article-title: Capsule-delivered fecal microbiota transplant is safe and well tolerated in patients with ulcerative colitis publication-title: Dig Dis Sci – volume: 99 start-page: e22129 year: 2020 article-title: Treatment of intestinal graft-versus-host disease with unrelated donor fecal microbiota transplantation capsules: a case report publication-title: Medicine – volume: 321 start-page: 156 year: 2019 end-page: 164 article-title: Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on 8-week remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: JAMA – volume: 64 start-page: 1672 year: 2019 end-page: 1678 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation capsules with targeted colonic versus gastric delivery in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a comparative cohort analysis of high and lose dose publication-title: Dig Dis Sci – volume: 67 start-page: 1920 year: 2018 end-page: 1941 article-title: The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection and other potential indications: joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines publication-title: Gut – volume: 152 start-page: 799 year: 2017 end-page: 811 article-title: Efficacy of sterile fecal filtrate transfer for treating patients with Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 313 start-page: 398 year: 2015 end-page: 408 article-title: Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review publication-title: JAMA – volume: 366 start-page: l4898 year: 2019 article-title: RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials publication-title: BMJ – volume: 21 start-page: 1539 year: 2002 end-page: 1558 article-title: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 110 start-page: S933 year: 2015 end-page: S934 article-title: The cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for managing multiply recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: examining the impact of universal stool banks and encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 10 start-page: e00012 year: 2019 article-title: Alterations of gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome based on 16S rRNA-targeted sequencing: a systematic review publication-title: Clin Transl Gastroenterol – volume: 110 start-page: 600 year: 2015 end-page: 601 article-title: Frozen encapsulated stool in recurrent Clostridium difficile: exploring the role of pills in the treatment hierarchy of fecal microbiota transplant nonresponders publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 29–30 start-page: 100642 year: 2020 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: EClinicalMedicine – volume: 14 start-page: 134 year: 2016 article-title: Oral, frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) capsules for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: BMC Med – volume: 73 start-page: e166 year: 2021 end-page: e175 article-title: Oral capsulized fecal microbiota transplantation for eradication of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae colonization with a metagenomic perspective publication-title: Clin Infect Dis – volume: 31 start-page: 411 year: 2018 end-page: 418 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: experience, protocol, and results publication-title: Rev Esp Quimioter – volume: 60 start-page: 940 year: 2014 end-page: 947 article-title: Altered profile of human gut microbiome is associated with cirrhosis and its complications publication-title: J Hepatol – volume: 18 start-page: 855 year: 2020 end-page: 863 article-title: Effects of fecal microbiota transplantation with oral capsules in obese patients publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 67 start-page: 634 year: 2018 end-page: 643 article-title: Bacteriophage transfer during faecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection is associated with treatment outcome publication-title: Gut – volume: 55 start-page: 300 year: 2021 end-page: 308 article-title: Oral fecal microbiota transplant capsules are safe and effective for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol – volume: 17 start-page: e1003051 year: 2020 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation for the improvement of metabolism in obesity: the FMT-TRIM double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial publication-title: PLoS Med – volume: 42 start-page: 71 year: 2015 end-page: 83 article-title: Deviations in human gut microbiota: a novel diagnostic test for determining dysbiosis in patients with IBS or IBD publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 46 start-page: 871 year: 2018 end-page: 874 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation in a kidney transplant recipient with recurrent urinary tract infection publication-title: Infection – volume: 3 year: 2016 article-title: Fecal microbiota transplantation by freeze-dried oral capsules for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection publication-title: Open Forum Infect Dis – volume: 20 start-page: 299 year: 2020 article-title: Effect of fecal microbiota transplant on symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review publication-title: BMC Psychiatry – volume: 6 start-page: e1000097 year: 2009 article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement publication-title: PLoS Med – volume: 46 start-page: 213 year: 2017 end-page: 224 article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal microbiota transplantation for the induction of remission for active ulcerative colitis publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 24 start-page: 5403 year: 2018 end-page: 5414 article-title: Five years of fecal microbiota transplantation – an update of the Israeli experience publication-title: World J Gastroenterol – volume: 4 start-page: 675 year: 2019 end-page: 685 article-title: Faecal microbiota transplantation for diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 13 start-page: 1929 year: 2015 end-page: 1936 article-title: Level of fecal calprotectin correlates with endoscopic and histologic Inflammation and identifies patients with mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 13 start-page: e0205064 year: 2018 article-title: Safety and preliminary efficacy of orally administered lyophilized fecal microbiota product compared with frozen product given by enema for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 6 start-page: 1232 year: 2018 end-page: 1244 article-title: Efficacy of different faecal microbiota transplantation protocols for Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: United European Gastroenterol J – volume: 53 start-page: 33 year: 2021 end-page: 42 article-title: Systematic review: the global incidence of faecal microbiota transplantation-related adverse events from 2000 to 2020 publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – ident: bibr35-17562848211041004 doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03 – ident: bibr46-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1177/2050640619839918 – ident: bibr1-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017 – ident: bibr57-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa737 – ident: bibr31-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729756 – volume: 67 start-page: 634 year: 2018 ident: bibr75-17562848211041004 publication-title: Gut – ident: bibr3-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1177/2050640618780762 – ident: bibr56-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316434 – ident: bibr52-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000330 – ident: bibr4-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1111/apt.14201 – ident: bibr50-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0549-6 – ident: bibr64-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017731 – ident: bibr81-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1111/apt.13236 – ident: bibr65-17562848211041004 doi: 10.18620/ctt-1866-8836-2020-9-2-47-59 – ident: bibr17-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318320 – volume: 53 start-page: 33 year: 2021 ident: bibr27-17562848211041004 publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/apt.16148 – ident: bibr9-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1111/apt.15116 – ident: bibr37-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001194 – ident: bibr47-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.038 – ident: bibr39-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.07.005 – ident: bibr43-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0930-z – ident: bibr2-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1111/apt.13868 – ident: bibr51-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.81 – ident: bibr7-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1111/apt.13144 – ident: bibr5-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019 – ident: bibr44-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205064 – ident: bibr71-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1159/000497042 – volume: 31 start-page: 411 year: 2018 ident: bibr48-17562848211041004 publication-title: Rev Esp Quimioter – ident: bibr80-17562848211041004 doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000012 – ident: bibr10-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316818 – ident: bibr53-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13875 – ident: bibr87-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1854640 – ident: bibr84-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1002/hep.24423 – volume: 57 start-page: 296 year: 2019 ident: bibr21-17562848211041004 publication-title: Z Gastroenterol doi: 10.1055/a-0821-7166 – ident: bibr36-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5396-6 – ident: bibr13-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7 – volume: 23 start-page: 103 year: 2018 ident: bibr19-17562848211041004 publication-title: Helicobacter – ident: bibr70-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1002/hep.30690 – ident: bibr82-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20046 – ident: bibr30-17562848211041004 – ident: bibr8-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100642 – ident: bibr11-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy149 – ident: bibr68-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.006 – ident: bibr72-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.038 – ident: bibr22-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001147 – ident: bibr60-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy334 – ident: bibr79-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1007/s12328-017-0813-5 – ident: bibr83-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30182-4 – ident: bibr34-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 – ident: bibr73-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.010 – ident: bibr76-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010 – ident: bibr26-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2020.06.018 – ident: bibr59-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.001 – ident: bibr62-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1585939 – ident: bibr29-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898 – ident: bibr40-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1155/2019/4549298 – ident: bibr77-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01586-19 – ident: bibr32-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1002/sim.1186 – ident: bibr45-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa073 – ident: bibr49-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.12.022 – ident: bibr63-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz073 – ident: bibr28-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103 – ident: bibr23-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001495 – ident: bibr16-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02654-5 – ident: bibr41-17562848211041004 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i47.5403 – ident: bibr38-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011706 – ident: bibr86-17562848211041004 – ident: bibr61-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05596-5 – ident: bibr12-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17077 – ident: bibr55-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30198-0 – ident: bibr69-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003051 – ident: bibr74-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqab065 – ident: bibr24-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 – ident: bibr33-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004 – ident: bibr78-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz006.050 – ident: bibr15-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1111/apt.15330 – ident: bibr88-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1177/2050640620967898 – ident: bibr6-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037 – ident: bibr67-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022129 – ident: bibr58-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1190-9 – ident: bibr25-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1155/2018/8941340 – ident: bibr54-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0680-9 – ident: bibr42-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw091 – ident: bibr14-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1111/apt.14173 – ident: bibr18-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.006 – ident: bibr20-17562848211041004 doi: 10.14309/00000434-201510001-02248 – ident: bibr66-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024968 – ident: bibr85-17562848211041004 doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.019 |
SSID | ssj0062739 |
Score | 2.3348095 |
Snippet | Background:
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied... Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases.... Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied... Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref sage |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 17562848211041004 |
SubjectTerms | Antibiotics Disease Gastroenterology Infections Meta-Analysis Microbiota Microorganisms Systematic review |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ1Na9ZAEIAX6aF4Ea1f0VZWEAQhmOxXEm9VLEXQixZ6C5PsLBbepkVTxJv_wX_oL3Fmd9_Yl_px8ZrswrAzuzOzH88I8UR5H1qvbclltkvKv0wJTRNK6Awy7cT5IdI-37nDI_Pm2B5fKvXFd8ISHjgN3POqG-xYhdG1oI2tPcXnXYPV0A6jxtoOvPqSz1snU2kNduSUu3yGyXgl8pGO1uGWsx3DjLQNLxRh_b-LMK9elLx02ys6oIOb4kaOHOV-kviWuIbTjth-m8_Gb4sv7xcos0wPUiRvsspTnKGEzB55IckqgTLjFcWYXgZA0pE8PUk4phnkHGHnK0gvkib549t3ibnyqKQAV66fUkpk-ASMX--Io4PXH14dlrmsQjlareZy0IazGAUagyYVetQObMNv9Rn-3pKGdK0GrDxW6GiOgqIFPXgNXlnftvqu2JrOJrwvpPdQ22AMtVVmDB10oyMN2aCxM4BVIar1MPdjZo5z6YtVX2fM-BXNFOLZ0uU8ATf-1vgl625pyKzs-IEsqM8W1P_Lggqxu9Z8nyfw554SS63iplghHi-_aerxeQpMeHZBbazrOF5WqhD3kqEskmhKe41RJGGzYUIbom7-mU4-Rrx3a8h7cc-nbGy_RPrjKDz4H6PwUFxXfF0n7i7tiq350wXuUbw1D4_i1PoJD8oltQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 dbid: AFRWT link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1ba9VAEF7qKYgv4t3UKisIgrA22VuyvkgVD0XQB22xb2Gzu9HCOTlScyh98z_4D_0lzmw20UOr-JpMyLA7s3Pb-YaQJ9z7tvJCMRyzzSD-ksyWZcuskQHRTrRvItrne31wJN8eq-Mtshp7YdIKfnuO16qAo3hYo3ZjNnovFRn3wOZpOFcrjF4kYp69XPfLekh3j1M18AnWp9dLLG07vBB5zsb2titkm5da8RnZ3p9_-HQ4Ht4arLmJPZRKM_xDKoRe-tMNUxYR_y9zUy_etvzjyli0YvMb5HpyP-n-IC83yVbobpGr71KB_TY5-zghO9Ohq4VippYuQ2-ZTQAmLyiItoXwegGOqqetDbDRdHkyYDr1lvYRMX1hh7amjv78_oOGNL6UgpdMx35MGhDBwrrzO-Ro_ubw9QFLsxmYU4L3rBESQyFuRWgFyIEPQltVYsM_IshXsM2i4E3IfciDBkW3HKxC64X1XPmqEnfJrFt14T6h3ttCtVICLZeuNdY47Y1RrQhG2pBnJB-XuXYJuBznZyzqImGVX9iZjDybPvk6oHb8i_gV7t1EiIDb8cHq9HOd9LfOTaNc3jpdWSFVAfxpU4a8qRonQqGajOyOO1-PMlxDdCp4zKxl5PH0GvQXizK2C6s10Cht0OnmPCP3BkGZOBEQO0vJgcNyQ4Q2WN180518iRjhlQQTiF8-RWH7zdJfV2HnvykfkGscL_bEPNQumfWn6_AQPLO-eZS06RfmxTJ6 priority: 102 providerName: SAGE Publications |
Title | Systematic review with meta-analysis: encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation – evidence for clinical efficacy |
URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17562848211041004 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34484424 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2613283540 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2569615322 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8414624 https://doaj.org/article/09b5c0fc68a3451d99697e0b8bc3e15b |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1baxUxEA7agvgi3t1aDxEEQQju5rYbX6SVHopgkdrieVuym6QWTvfUdkvxzf_gP_SXOJPN2Xqo9mkhF5jNzCQzk8w3hLzizoXKCcWwzDYD_0syW5aBWSM9op1o10S0zz29eyg_ztQsBdzO07PK5Z4YN2q3aDFG_hYsfcFjlOL96XeGVaPwdjWV0LhN1hG6DKW6nI0Ol4aj2cSESKUZzJ2lW00EXMI22Jkr9H8koqatnEsRvv9fNuf1p5N_vf-KR9L0PrmXbEm6NTD_Abnlu4fkzqd0W_6IXH4ZYZrpkKJCMexKT3xvmU1oJO8oyKkFX3kOVqejwXrgGj05HgCaekv7CH8-t0OOUkd___xFfapFSsHkpcvkSuoRjsK2Px6Tw-nOwYddlgotsFYJ3rNGSPRruBU-CGCq80JbVWL2PsLBV8AzUfDG587nXoPWWg5bfHDCOq5cVYknZK1bdP4Zoc7ZQgUpYSyXbTDWtNoZo4LwRlqfZyRfLnPdJhRyLIYxr4sEPH6NMxl5M045HSA4bhq8jbwbByJ6dmxYnB3VSRnr3DSqzUOrKyukKoA-bUqfN1XTCl-oJiObS87XSaXP6ysBzMjLsRuUEW9YbOcXFzBGaYMWNOcZeToIykiJAEdYSg4UlisitELqak93_C0CflcSzjOc-RqF7Yqk_67Cxs0_8Jzc5fg0J0aSNslaf3bhX4Bt1TeTqEATsr413f96AN_tnb3P-5MYqfgDIbUjPw |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3LbtUwELVKkaAbxJsLBYwEQkKySPxKjIQQr-qWPja00t2lTuzQSre5pU1Vdcc_8B98FF_CjOOkXBW66zZxoklmxnPG9pwh5Dl3rs6dUAzbbDPIvySzWVYza6RHthPtysD2uanH2_LLRE0WyK--FgaPVfZzYpio3azCNfLXgPQFD6sU7w6-M-wahburfQuNzizW_OkJpGxHb1c_gX5fcL7yeevjmMWuAqxSgresFBJBPLfC1wK-wHmhrcqwVB25z3MQUKS89InziddgopbDfFY7YR1XLs8FvPcKuQqBN8FkL5sMCZ4GKGBCAabSDGSdxF1UJHjCaxAJcsy3JLK0zcXB0C7gXxj3_FHNv86bhRC4cpPciNiVvu-M7RZZ8M1tcm0j7s7fISdfB1po2pXEUFzmpfu-tcxG9pM3FPzCQm4-BZTraG09WAnd3-sIoVpL20C3PrVdTVRDf__4SX3sfUoBYtO-mJN6pL-w1eldsn0pKrhHFptZ4x8Q6pxNVS0ljOWyqo01lXbGqFp4I61PRiTpf3NRRdZzbL4xLdJIdH5OMyPyanjkoKP8uGjwB9TdMBDZusOF2eG3Ijp_kZhSVUld6dwKqVKQT5vMJ2VeVsKnqhyR5V7zRZxCjoozgx-RZ8NtcH7c0bGNnx3DGKUNInbOR-R-ZyiDJAISbyk5SJjNmdCcqPN3mr3dQDCeS4if-ORLNLYzkf77Fx5e_AFPyfXx1sZ6sb66ufaILHE8FhRWsZbJYnt47B8DrmvLJ8GZKNm5bO_9A8nBWwo |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1baxUxEA5yCsUX8e5q1QiCIMTu5rYb3-rlUG9FtMW-LdlNUgune0rdIr75H_yH_hJnstnVQ6v4upksQ2YmM5PJfCHkIXcuVE4ohs9sM8i_JLNlGZg10iPaiXZNRPvc0dt78vW-2k8HbtgLk1bwyxO8VgUcxc0arfvYhc1UY9wEl6dhW60weZFFhANdkxKSvBlZ25p_-LQ77sUanLOJLZFKM5yR6prn_mTFM0UA__OizrOXJ_-4ARad0vwyuZSiSbo1iP8KueC7q2T9XaqXXyNfP05AzXRoUqF48EqPfG-ZTXgkTyloqoVseQFxp6PBepAbPTocIJp6S_sIgL6wQ5dSR39-_0F9eo2UQtBLx_ZK6hGQwrbfrpO9-cvd59ssPbXAWiV4zxohMbPhVvggQKzOC21Vif37CAhfgdREwRufO597DXZrOWzywQnruHJVJW6QWbfs_C1CnbOFClICLZdtMNa02hmjgvBGWp9nJB-XuW4TDjk-h7GoiwQ9fkYyGXk8TTkeQDj-RfwMZTcRIn52_LA8OaiTOda5aVSbh1ZXVkhVAH_alD5vqqYVvlBNRjZGydejStaQbAoeD8oy8mAaBnPEGovt_PIUaJQ2GENznpGbg6JMnAhIhaXkwGG5okIrrK6OdIefI-R3JcGj4cxHqGy_WfrrKtz-b8r7ZP39i3n99tXOmzvkIscrO_GEaYPM-pNTfxdirr65lwzrF6XeIPM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic+review+with+meta-analysis%3A+encapsulated+faecal+microbiota+transplantation+%E2%80%93+evidence+for+clinical+efficacy&rft.jtitle=Therapeutic+advances+in+gastroenterology&rft.au=Cold%2C+Frederik&rft.au=Baunwall%2C+Simon+Mark+Dahl&rft.au=Dahlerup%2C+Jens+Frederik&rft.au=Petersen%2C+Andreas+Munk&rft.date=2021&rft.issn=1756-2848&rft.eissn=1756-2848&rft.volume=14&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F17562848211041004&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_17562848211041004 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1756-2848&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1756-2848&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1756-2848&client=summon |