Interocular Symmetry and Intermachine Reproducibility of Optic Disc and Macular Parameters Measured by Two Different Models of Optical Coherence Tomography

To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 from healthy subjects. Forty-three volunteers were examined with bo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Vol. 18; pp. 2397 - 2406
Main Authors Firdaus, Salma, Pereira, Lívia, Yang, Ge, Huang-Link, Yumin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2024
Dove Medical Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 from healthy subjects. Forty-three volunteers were examined with both HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 at the same visit. Optic nerve head (ONH) and macular data were acquired using ONH Cube 200×200 scans and macular volume cube 512×128 scans, respectively. The average age of the participants was 33 ± 8.6 years. Interocular OCT parameters of ONH and macula showed a high correlation between the right and left eyes regardless of HD-OCT models, displaying a low coefficient of variation (CV). However, the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was thicker (96.67±11.19µm vs 95.3±10.89µm, p<0.01), and the average central subfield thickness (261.51±17.45µm vs 262.51±17.39 µm, p<0.01) and cube average thickness (283.91± 13.59µm vs 286.55±13.09µm, p<0.05) were thinner when measured by Cirrus 4000 compared to 5000. Intermachine reproducibility and reliability of RNFL and macular parameters exhibited a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.985) and low CV (2.4%). Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measured by two OCT models showed similar values with an average thickness of 85 µm and had high intermachine reproducibility with high ICC (0.993) and low CV (1.2%). High interocular symmetry was observed across both HD-OCT models. Intermachine reproducibility for RNFL and all macular parameters was also high. GCIPL showed minimal intermachine differences with high reproducibility and reliability. Thus, the results imply that GCIPL values measured by two Cirrus OCT models may be used interchangeably.
AbstractList To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 from healthy subjects.PurposeTo compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 from healthy subjects.Forty-three volunteers were examined with both HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 at the same visit. Optic nerve head (ONH) and macular data were acquired using ONH Cube 200×200 scans and macular volume cube 512×128 scans, respectively.Patients and MethodsForty-three volunteers were examined with both HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 at the same visit. Optic nerve head (ONH) and macular data were acquired using ONH Cube 200×200 scans and macular volume cube 512×128 scans, respectively.The average age of the participants was 33 ± 8.6 years. Interocular OCT parameters of ONH and macula showed a high correlation between the right and left eyes regardless of HD-OCT models, displaying a low coefficient of variation (CV). However, the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was thicker (96.67±11.19µm vs 95.3±10.89µm, p<0.01), and the average central subfield thickness (261.51±17.45µm vs 262.51±17.39 µm, p<0.01) and cube average thickness (283.91± 13.59µm vs 286.55±13.09µm, p<0.05) were thinner when measured by Cirrus 4000 compared to 5000. Intermachine reproducibility and reliability of RNFL and macular parameters exhibited a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.985) and low CV (2.4%). Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measured by two OCT models showed similar values with an average thickness of 85 µm and had high intermachine reproducibility with high ICC (0.993) and low CV (1.2%).ResultsThe average age of the participants was 33 ± 8.6 years. Interocular OCT parameters of ONH and macula showed a high correlation between the right and left eyes regardless of HD-OCT models, displaying a low coefficient of variation (CV). However, the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was thicker (96.67±11.19µm vs 95.3±10.89µm, p<0.01), and the average central subfield thickness (261.51±17.45µm vs 262.51±17.39 µm, p<0.01) and cube average thickness (283.91± 13.59µm vs 286.55±13.09µm, p<0.05) were thinner when measured by Cirrus 4000 compared to 5000. Intermachine reproducibility and reliability of RNFL and macular parameters exhibited a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.985) and low CV (2.4%). Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measured by two OCT models showed similar values with an average thickness of 85 µm and had high intermachine reproducibility with high ICC (0.993) and low CV (1.2%).High interocular symmetry was observed across both HD-OCT models. Intermachine reproducibility for RNFL and all macular parameters was also high. GCIPL showed minimal intermachine differences with high reproducibility and reliability. Thus, the results imply that GCIPL values measured by two Cirrus OCT models may be used interchangeably.ConclusionHigh interocular symmetry was observed across both HD-OCT models. Intermachine reproducibility for RNFL and all macular parameters was also high. GCIPL showed minimal intermachine differences with high reproducibility and reliability. Thus, the results imply that GCIPL values measured by two Cirrus OCT models may be used interchangeably.
Purpose: To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 from healthy subjects. Patients and Methods: Forty-three volunteers were examined with both HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 at the same visit. Optic nerve head (ONH) and macular data were acquired using ONH Cube 200x200 scans and macular volume cube 512x128 scans, respectively. Results: The average age of the participants was 33 +/- 8.6 years. Interocular OCT parameters of ONH and macula showed a high correlation between the right and left eyes regardless of HD-OCT models, displaying a low coefficient of variation (CV). However, the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was thicker (96.67 +/- 11.19 mu m vs 95.3 +/- 10.89 mu m, p&amp;lt;0.01), and the average central subfield thickness (261.51 +/- 17.45&amp;lt;mu&amp;gt;m vs 262.51 +/- 17.39 mu m, p&amp;lt;0.01) and cube average thickness (283.91 +/- 13.59&amp;lt;mu&amp;gt;m vs 286.55 +/- 13.09 mu m, p&amp;lt;0.05) were thinner when measured by Cirrus 4000 compared to 5000. Intermachine reproducibility and reliability of RNFL and macular parameters exhibited a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.985) and low CV (2.4%). Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measured by two OCT models showed similar values with an average thickness of 85 &amp;lt;mu&amp;gt;m and had high intermachine reproducibility with high ICC (0.993) and low CV (1.2%). Conclusion: High interocular symmetry was observed across both HD-OCT models. Intermachine reproducibility for RNFL and all macular parameters was also high. GCIPL showed minimal intermachine differences with high reproducibility and reliability. Thus, the results imply that GCIPL values measured by two Cirrus OCT models may be used interchangeably.
Purpose: To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 from healthy subjects. Patients and Methods: Forty-three volunteers were examined with both HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 at the same visit. Optic nerve head (ONH) and macular data were acquired using ONH Cube 200x200 scans and macular volume cube 512x128 scans, respectively. Results: The average age of the participants was 33 [+ or -] 8.6 years. Interocular OCT parameters of ONH and macula showed a high correlation between the right and left eyes regardless of HD-OCT models, displaying a low coefficient of variation (CV). However, the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was thicker (96.67 [+ or -] 11.19 [micro]m vs 95.3 [+ or -] 10.89 [micro]m, p<0.01), and the average central subfield thickness (261.51 [+ or -] 17.45gm vs 262.51 [+ or -] 17.39 [micro]m, p<0.01) and cube average thickness (283.91 [+ or -] 13.59 [micro]m vs 286.55 [+ or -] 13.09 [micro]m, p<0.05) were thinner when measured by Cirrus 4000 compared to 5000. Intermachine reproducibility and reliability of RNFL and macular parameters exhibited a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.985) and low CV (2.4%). Ganglion cell- inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measured by two OCT models showed similar values with an average thickness of 85 gm and had high intermachine reproducibility with high ICC (0.993) and low CV (1.2%). Conclusion: High interocular symmetry was observed across both HD-OCT models. Intermachine reproducibility for RNFL and all macular parameters was also high. GCIPL showed minimal intermachine differences with high reproducibility and reliability. Thus, the results imply that GCIPL values measured by two Cirrus OCT models may be used interchangeably. Keywords: neuro imaging, optical coherence tomography, interocular symmetry, intermachine reproducibility, retina, ganglion cellinner plexiform layer, interchangeability
Salma Firdaus,1,* Lívia Figueiredo Pereira,2,* Ge Yang,3 Yumin Huang-Link4 1Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; 2Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; 3Huizhou Aier Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Huizhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China; 4Division of Neurology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Ge Yang, Huizhou Aier Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Huizhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China, Email geyang95@sina.comPurpose: To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 from healthy subjects.Patients and Methods: Forty-three volunteers were examined with both HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 at the same visit. Optic nerve head (ONH) and macular data were acquired using ONH Cube 200× 200 scans and macular volume cube 512× 128 scans, respectively.Results: The average age of the participants was 33 ± 8.6 years. Interocular OCT parameters of ONH and macula showed a high correlation between the right and left eyes regardless of HD-OCT models, displaying a low coefficient of variation (CV). However, the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was thicker (96.67± 11.19μm vs 95.3± 10.89μm, p< 0.01), and the average central subfield thickness (261.51± 17.45μm vs 262.51± 17.39 μm, p< 0.01) and cube average thickness (283.91± 13.59μm vs 286.55± 13.09μm, p< 0.05) were thinner when measured by Cirrus 4000 compared to 5000. Intermachine reproducibility and reliability of RNFL and macular parameters exhibited a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.985) and low CV (2.4%). Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measured by two OCT models showed similar values with an average thickness of 85 μm and had high intermachine reproducibility with high ICC (0.993) and low CV (1.2%).Conclusion: High interocular symmetry was observed across both HD-OCT models. Intermachine reproducibility for RNFL and all macular parameters was also high. GCIPL showed minimal intermachine differences with high reproducibility and reliability. Thus, the results imply that GCIPL values measured by two Cirrus OCT models may be used interchangeably.Keywords: neuro imaging, optical coherence tomography, interocular symmetry, intermachine reproducibility, retina, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer, interchangeability
To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) Cirrus HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 from healthy subjects. Forty-three volunteers were examined with both HD-OCT 4000 and HD-OCT 5000 at the same visit. Optic nerve head (ONH) and macular data were acquired using ONH Cube 200×200 scans and macular volume cube 512×128 scans, respectively. The average age of the participants was 33 ± 8.6 years. Interocular OCT parameters of ONH and macula showed a high correlation between the right and left eyes regardless of HD-OCT models, displaying a low coefficient of variation (CV). However, the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was thicker (96.67±11.19µm vs 95.3±10.89µm, p<0.01), and the average central subfield thickness (261.51±17.45µm vs 262.51±17.39 µm, p<0.01) and cube average thickness (283.91± 13.59µm vs 286.55±13.09µm, p<0.05) were thinner when measured by Cirrus 4000 compared to 5000. Intermachine reproducibility and reliability of RNFL and macular parameters exhibited a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.985) and low CV (2.4%). Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measured by two OCT models showed similar values with an average thickness of 85 µm and had high intermachine reproducibility with high ICC (0.993) and low CV (1.2%). High interocular symmetry was observed across both HD-OCT models. Intermachine reproducibility for RNFL and all macular parameters was also high. GCIPL showed minimal intermachine differences with high reproducibility and reliability. Thus, the results imply that GCIPL values measured by two Cirrus OCT models may be used interchangeably.
Audience Academic
Author Yang, Ge
Pereira, Lívia
Firdaus, Salma
Huang-Link, Yumin
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Salma
  surname: Firdaus
  fullname: Firdaus, Salma
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lívia
  surname: Pereira
  fullname: Pereira, Lívia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ge
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1214-9411
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Ge
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yumin
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4192-079X
  surname: Huang-Link
  fullname: Huang-Link, Yumin
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39221077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-207482$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNptkl1r2zAUhs3oWNtsd7segsHYxZLpw5bly5Bua6AhZc12K2TpOFGxrUyyKf4t-7NTPlqaUXQhIT3n4Uh6L5Oz1rWQJO8JnlCS5l-Xt6vryV3KM8bxq-SCkDwfZ6lgZ8_W58llCPcYc4pF_iY5ZwWlBOf5RfJ33nbgne5r5dHd0DTQ-QGp1qD9QaP0xraAfsLWO9NrW9radgNyFVpuO6vRlQ16jy_UwXGrvIoS8AEtQIXeg0HlgFYPLrJVBR7aDi2cgTo8WVSNZm6zO9KAVq5xa6-2m-Ft8rpSdYB3x3mU_Pr-bTW7Ht8sf8xn05uxzhjpxgXTJtcGlwJyVqSFKKDkOCWME1poTRkuTcmg4phqnBYlL_IqozQlAjLDU2CjZH7wGqfu5dbbRvlBOmXlfsP5tVQ-tlmDLLjAIs0oI7RKjdIlVSQHAxwzzFllomt8cIUH2Pblie3K_p7ubbXtJcV5KmjkPx_4-L5_egidbOKLQl2rFlwfJMNFITIhBI_oxwO6VrET21au80rvcDkVJH6noDEEo2TyAhWHgcbqGJ3Kxv2Tgk_PCjag6m4TXN131rXhFPxwbLUvGzBPV3sMUwToAdDeheChktp2aueJLdhaEix3iZW7xMpjYmPRl_-KHr0v4v8AgifrJQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S503948
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S505608
Cites_doi 10.1111/aos.15046
10.1167/iovs.11-8836
10.1007/s10384-012-0146-3
10.1093/brain/awv396
10.1111/ene.13893
10.1080/02713683.2021.1908568
10.1212/WNL.0000000000002774
10.1007/s00417-015-3150-8
10.1177/1352458510371640
10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30278-8
10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.005
10.4103/ijo.IJO_3364_20
10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1563
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02045.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.052
10.1038/s41598-020-71546-1
10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.12.021
10.1186/s12886-021-02023-0
10.1186/s12886-018-0940-x
10.1038/s41433-020-01288-x
10.1167/iovs.10-6312
10.1097/IAE.0000000000000712
10.1126/science.1957169
10.1002/ana.25462
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302242
10.1007/s00415-017-8532-x
10.1371/journal.pone.0036847
10.1016/j.ajo.2021.05.016
10.1093/brain/awr264
10.1038/s41598-021-04563-3
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 Firdaus et al.
COPYRIGHT 2024 Dove Medical Press Limited
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 Firdaus et al.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 Dove Medical Press Limited
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
ABXSW
ADTPV
AOWAS
D8T
DG8
ZZAVC
DOA
DOI 10.2147/OPTH.S465360
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
SWEPUB Linköpings universitet full text
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Freely available online
SWEPUB Linköpings universitet
SwePub Articles full text
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic




PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1177-5483
EndPage 2406
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_96808452312f4dacb2a17ede603063fd
oai_DiVA_org_liu_207482
A811078265
39221077
10_2147_OPTH_S465360
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID ---
0YH
29B
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
7X7
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8G5
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AFKRA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
AZQEC
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EJD
F5P
FRP
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GUQSH
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
ITC
KQ8
M2O
M48
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RNS
RPM
TDBHL
TR2
UKHRP
VDV
W2D
NPM
PMFND
7X8
ABXSW
ADTPV
AOWAS
D8T
DG8
ZZAVC
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-93cd7cd0b8e7394989eb604136129cc230bdb3ef602c049b697f522418e5d64e3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1177-5483
1177-5467
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:22:58 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 06:31:20 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 22:19:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:03:35 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:02:54 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:27:27 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:58:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:21:54 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:40 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords interchangeability
optical coherence tomography
retina
neuro imaging
ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer
intermachine reproducibility
interocular symmetry
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0
2024 Firdaus et al.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c531t-93cd7cd0b8e7394989eb604136129cc230bdb3ef602c049b697f522418e5d64e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1214-9411
0000-0002-4192-079X
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.2147/OPTH.S465360
PMID 39221077
PQID 3099858886
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_96808452312f4dacb2a17ede603063fd
swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_liu_207482
proquest_miscellaneous_3099858886
gale_infotracmisc_A811078265
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A811078265
gale_healthsolutions_A811078265
pubmed_primary_39221077
crossref_citationtrail_10_2147_OPTH_S465360
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S465360
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace New Zealand
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New Zealand
PublicationTitle Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Ophthalmol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Dove Medical Press Limited
Dove Medical Press
Publisher_xml – name: Dove Medical Press Limited
– name: Dove Medical Press
References Huang-Link (ref20) 2015; 130
Tur (ref30) 2016; 139
Yamashita (ref16) 2012; 53
Napoli (ref23) 2020; 10
Huang-Link (ref9) 2019; 26
Song (ref21) 2022; 12
Parisi (ref4) 1999; 40
Gelfand (ref6) 2012; 7
Pérez-García (ref28) 2021; 46
Mutlu (ref31) 2018; 75
Petzold (ref5) 2017; 16
Francoz (ref25) 2014; 98
Syc (ref10) 2010; 16
Han (ref13) 2015; 253
Shin (ref3) 2018; 125
Nolan-Kenney (ref17) 2019; 85
(ref14) 2020
Garcia-Martin (ref29) 2017; 124
Huang (ref1) 1991; 254
Callaway (ref12) 2016; 36
Garcia-Martin (ref32) 2011; 89
Kumar (ref26) 2021; 69
Larsson (ref22) 2018; 18
Syc (ref7) 2012; 135
Cruz-Herranz (ref15) 2016; 86
Mahmoudinezhad (ref18) 2021; 231
Minakaran (ref24) 2021; 35
Stoor (ref11) 2022; 100
Xu (ref19) 2021; 21
Gabriele (ref2) 2011; 52
Albrecht (ref8) 2017; 264
Yamashita (ref27) 2012; 56
References_xml – volume: 100
  start-page: 1103
  year: 2022
  ident: ref11
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/aos.15046
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1102
  year: 2012
  ident: ref16
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8836
– volume: 56
  start-page: 502
  year: 2012
  ident: ref27
  publication-title: Jpn J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s10384-012-0146-3
– volume: 139
  start-page: 816
  year: 2016
  ident: ref30
  publication-title: Brain
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awv396
– volume: 26
  start-page: 808
  year: 2019
  ident: ref9
  publication-title: Eur J Neurol
  doi: 10.1111/ene.13893
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1574
  year: 2021
  ident: ref28
  publication-title: Curr Eye Res
  doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1908568
– volume-title: Workflow Efficiency of CIRRUS 6000 Compared to CIRRUS 5000 and CIRRUS 4000
  year: 2020
  ident: ref14
– volume: 86
  start-page: 2303
  year: 2016
  ident: ref15
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002774
– volume: 253
  start-page: 2293
  year: 2015
  ident: ref13
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3150-8
– volume: 16
  start-page: 829
  year: 2010
  ident: ref10
  publication-title: Mult Scler
  doi: 10.1177/1352458510371640
– volume: 16
  start-page: 797
  year: 2017
  ident: ref5
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30278-8
– volume: 124
  start-page: 688
  year: 2017
  ident: ref29
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.005
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1713
  year: 2021
  ident: ref26
  publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_3364_20
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1256
  year: 2018
  ident: ref31
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1563
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2520
  year: 1999
  ident: ref4
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
– volume: 89
  start-page: 23
  year: 2011
  ident: ref32
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02045.x
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1515
  year: 2018
  ident: ref3
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.052
– volume: 10
  start-page: 14508
  year: 2020
  ident: ref23
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71546-1
– volume: 130
  start-page: 122
  year: 2015
  ident: ref20
  publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg
  doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.12.021
– volume: 21
  start-page: 267
  year: 2021
  ident: ref19
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02023-0
– volume: 18
  start-page: 270
  year: 2018
  ident: ref22
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0940-x
– volume: 35
  start-page: 17
  year: 2021
  ident: ref24
  publication-title: Eye
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01288-x
– volume: 52
  start-page: 2425
  year: 2011
  ident: ref2
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6312
– volume: 36
  start-page: 335
  year: 2016
  ident: ref12
  publication-title: Retina
  doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000712
– volume: 254
  start-page: 1178
  year: 1991
  ident: ref1
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1957169
– volume: 85
  start-page: 618
  year: 2019
  ident: ref17
  publication-title: Ann Neurol
  doi: 10.1002/ana.25462
– volume: 98
  start-page: 322
  year: 2014
  ident: ref25
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302242
– volume: 264
  start-page: 1370
  year: 2017
  ident: ref8
  publication-title: J Neurol
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8532-x
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: ref6
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036847
– volume: 231
  start-page: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: ref18
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.05.016
– volume: 135
  start-page: 521
  year: 2012
  ident: ref7
  publication-title: Brain
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awr264
– volume: 12
  start-page: 653
  year: 2022
  ident: ref21
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04563-3
SSID ssj0062087
Score 2.3314233
Snippet To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain high-definition...
Purpose: To compare the interocular symmetry and investigate the intermachine reproducibility of optic disc and macular data measured by spectral-domain...
Salma Firdaus,1,* Lívia Figueiredo Pereira,2,* Ge Yang,3 Yumin Huang-Link4 1Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; 2Pontifical...
SourceID doaj
swepub
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 2397
SubjectTerms ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer
interchangeability
intermachine reproducibility
interocular symmetry
neuro imaging
optical coherence tomography
optics/refraction/instruments
retina
Tomography
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JLSR9pnaStCm16KJv4KcvHbdOwFLYJZFNyE3rCwq4dsl7K_pb-2c5IXjemlFxytQYjeUYz38ijbwj5YGyptEKeSskgQZEmGVWATEeykDxxuYMI6qstfrDJVf79uri-0-oLa8ICPXD4cCcV9obIIV1KUpcbqVUqk9IayxDsZs6g94WYt02mgg9maczLUOaOfXhOzi9mk-NLpBLzVJR_A5Dn6f_XG98JRwMCUR90znbJ0w4t0nGY5TPyyNbPyeNp9z_8BfntD_QaX0tKLzfLpW1vN1TWhvqBpa-UtBRQtid2DZWwG9o4eg6uQtPT-Up78akM77iQWKyFjJt0Gk4PDVUbOvvVgGxopdJS7J-2WPVvgQniJQ9_bZDOmmVHgv2SXJ19m32djLp2CyMNG7EFHWlTahMrbsusyiteWcViCHIAgiqtIVdRRmXWsTjVkFcoVpWuQATAbWFYbrM9slM3tX1NKCjA5CDkKkjvmOUyi7WDqJBkski0yyLyeasDoTsucmyJsRCQk6DGBGpMdBqLyMde-iZwcPxH7guqs5dB5mz_AOxJdPYk7rOniLxDYxDhGmq__8WYY6YMyVgRkU9eAj0ATFrL7iIDLB25tAaShwNJ2Ll6MPx-a3ACh7DcrbbNeiUywO284JyziLwKltivCgAtpOllGZGjYJqD9Z7Of479ehfztUgBH_J0_yE-ywF5kgKcC4dPh2SnvV3bNwDHWvXW77w_DKwyTA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Interocular Symmetry and Intermachine Reproducibility of Optic Disc and Macular Parameters Measured by Two Different Models of Optical Coherence Tomography
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39221077
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3099858886
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-207482
https://doaj.org/article/96808452312f4dacb2a17ede603063fd
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LbxMxELZKKyEuiDcLJRiJxwGl7NP2HhBKaasIKW1EE5SeLK_tRZGSLOQhyG_hzzJjb1asChKXHOLJys7Ynu_zjr8h5KWxvNAF6lQqBgRFmaibAzLtqkyJqExLiKAu2-Kc9cfpp0k22SO7aqP1H7j6K7XDelLj5ezo5_ftB1jw7zGNOUr5u4vhqH90iUJhDMj7AcQkjrUMBmnzPoHFoajLrPAuYPTEp8Bf-3UrODkN_-s79R-hqiUu6gLS2R1yu0aStOddf5fs2cU9cnNQvyu_T365w77K5ZnSy-18btfLLVULQ13D3GVRWgoI3Im--izZLa1KegHbiKYn05V25gPlnzFUmMiFapx04E8WDS22dPSjAltfZmVNsbbabNU8BTqIF0DclUI6qua1QPYDMj47HX3sd-tSDF0Ni3QN_tOGaxMWwvIkT3OR24KFEAABIOVaA48pTJHYkoWxBs5RsJyXGaIDYTPDUps8JPuLamEfEwrOMCkYlTlQP2aFSkJdQsSIEpVFukwC8nbnA6lrnXIslzGTwFfQYxI9JmuPBeRVY_3N63P8w-4Y3dnYoKq2-6JafpX1IpU51iFJgZpHcZkapYtYRdway5BYJaUJyHOcDNJfUW32BtkTyKKBqGUBeeMscL5Cp7WqLznA0FFnq2V52LKEVa1bzS92E05iE6bCLWy1WckEML3IhBAsII_8TGxGBWAXKDznAXntp2ZrvCfTLz033tl0I2PAjiJ-8t_9fUpuxYDn_OnTIdlfLzf2GeCxddEhN8KrPnzyCe-Qg-PT8-Hnjjvb6LhF-Bsntzbd
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interocular+Symmetry+and+Intermachine+Reproducibility+of+Optic+Disc+and+Macular+Parameters+Measured+by+Two+Different+Models+of+Optical+Coherence+Tomography&rft.jtitle=Clinical+ophthalmology+%28Auckland%2C+N.Z.%29&rft.au=Firdaus%2C+Salma&rft.au=Pereira%2C+Livia+Figueiredo&rft.au=Yang%2C+Ge&rft.au=Huang-Link%2C+Yumin&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.pub=Dove+Medical+Press+Limited&rft.issn=1177-5483&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=2397&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147%2FOPTH.S465360&rft.externalDocID=A811078265
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1177-5483&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1177-5483&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1177-5483&client=summon