Cognitive Illusions of Authorship Reveal Hierarchical Error Detection in Skilled Typists
The ability to detect errors is an essential component of cognitive control. Studies of error detection in humans typically use simple tasks and propose single-process theories of detection. We examined error detection by skilled typists and found illusions of authorship that provide evidence for tw...
Saved in:
| Published in | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) Vol. 330; no. 6004; pp. 683 - 686 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Washington, DC
American Association for the Advancement of Science
29.10.2010
The American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | The ability to detect errors is an essential component of cognitive control. Studies of error detection in humans typically use simple tasks and propose single-process theories of detection. We examined error detection by skilled typists and found illusions of authorship that provide evidence for two error-detection processes. We corrected errors that typists made and inserted errors in correct responses. When asked to report errors, typists took credit for corrected errors and accepted blame for inserted errors, claiming authorship for the appearance of the screen. However, their typing rate showed no evidence of these illusions, slowing down after corrected errors but not after inserted errors. This dissociation suggests two error-detection processes: one sensitive to the appearance of the screen and the other sensitive to keystrokes. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The ability to detect errors is an essential component of cognitive control. Studies of error detection in humans typically use simple tasks and propose single-process theories of detection. We examined error detection by skilled typists and found illusions of authorship that provide evidence for two error-detection processes. We corrected errors that typists made and inserted errors in correct responses. When asked to report errors, typists took credit for corrected errors and accepted blame for inserted errors, claiming authorship for the appearance of the screen. However, their typing rate showed no evidence of these illusions, slowing down after corrected errors but not after inserted errors. This dissociation suggests two error-detection processes: one sensitive to the appearance of the screen and the other sensitive to keystrokes. The ability to detect errors is an essential component of cognitive control. Studies of error detection in humans typically use simple tasks and propose single-process theories of detection. We examined error detection by skilled typists and found illusions of authorship that provide evidence for two error-detection processes. We corrected errors that typists made and inserted errors in correct responses. When asked to report errors, typists took credit for corrected errors and accepted blame for inserted errors, claiming authorship for the appearance of the screen. However, their typing rate showed no evidence of these illusions, slowing down after corrected errors but not after inserted errors. This dissociation suggests two error-detection processes: one sensitive to the appearance of the screen and the other sensitive to keystrokes. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] The ability to detect errors is an essential component of cognitive control. Studies of error detection in humans typically use simple tasks and propose single-process theories of detection. We examined error detection by skilled typists and found illusions of authorship that provide evidence for two error-detection processes. We corrected errors that typists made and inserted errors in correct responses. When asked to report errors, typists took credit for corrected errors and accepted blame for inserted errors, claiming authorship for the appearance of the screen. However, their typing rate showed no evidence of these illusions, slowing down after corrected errors but not after inserted errors. This dissociation suggests two error-detection processes: one sensitive to the appearance of the screen and the other sensitive to keystrokes.The ability to detect errors is an essential component of cognitive control. Studies of error detection in humans typically use simple tasks and propose single-process theories of detection. We examined error detection by skilled typists and found illusions of authorship that provide evidence for two error-detection processes. We corrected errors that typists made and inserted errors in correct responses. When asked to report errors, typists took credit for corrected errors and accepted blame for inserted errors, claiming authorship for the appearance of the screen. However, their typing rate showed no evidence of these illusions, slowing down after corrected errors but not after inserted errors. This dissociation suggests two error-detection processes: one sensitive to the appearance of the screen and the other sensitive to keystrokes. Even the most able typist makes errors, and Logan and Crump (p. 683 ) have used this real-world task to probe for the existence of two error-detection mechanisms. They inserted errors into words that had been typed correctly by the subjects, and they corrected errors that had been made. By measuring implicit error detection as the slowing of movement just after an error had been committed and by eliciting explicit monitoring of errors by the output shown on the screen, they uncovered a double dissociation. Inserted errors did not lengthen the interval until the next letter was typed, but they were reported by the typist as errors; on the other hand, corrected errors did increase the interval, but were nevertheless claimed by the subjects as having been typed correctly. One error-detection mechanism monitors the correctness of one’s action, whereas a second mechanism monitors the output. The ability to detect errors is an essential component of cognitive control. Studies of error detection in humans typically use simple tasks and propose single-process theories of detection. We examined error detection by skilled typists and found illusions of authorship that provide evidence for two error-detection processes. We corrected errors that typists made and inserted errors in correct responses. When asked to report errors, typists took credit for corrected errors and accepted blame for inserted errors, claiming authorship for the appearance of the screen. However, their typing rate showed no evidence of these illusions, slowing down after corrected errors but not after inserted errors. This dissociation suggests two error-detection processes: one sensitive to the appearance of the screen and the other sensitive to keystrokes. |
| Author | Crump, Matthew J.C Logan, Gordon D |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Logan, Gordon D – sequence: 2 fullname: Crump, Matthew J.C |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23387226$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21030660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFktFrFDEQxoNU7LX67JO6CKIvayfJJtk8lrPaQkGwLfi25HJJL-fe5kyyhf73znFrhT7UpzDM75uZzHxH5GCIgyPkNYXPlDJ5km1wg3UYaGha_ozMKGhRawb8gMwAuKxbUOKQHOW8BsCc5i_IIaPAQUqYkZ_zeDuEEu5cddH3Yw5xyFX01elYVjHlVdhWP9ydM311Hlwyya6CxeAspZiqL644W1BShaG6-hX63i2r6_ttyCW_JM-96bN7Nb3H5Obr2fX8vL78_u1ifnpZW8Gh1NprhdM6YbSinlvp2cJL1grTLIWXQi88l6qRC0ull77xli8UZcI70xovW35MPu7rblP8Pbpcuk3I1vW9GVwcc9dSJQFbsf-SSjJgQBlF8tOTJMNNNpRrzhF9_whdxzEN-ONOCa2pxHIIvZ2gcbFxy26bwsak--7vGRD4MAEm43p9MoMN-R_HeasYk8id7DmbYs7J-QeEQrczRDcZopsMgQrxSGFDMbublWRC_4TuzV63ziWmhzYNaE4VE5h_t897Eztzm3DamyvcHoddAYH--wPrlcxr |
| CODEN | SCIEAS |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_011_0208_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2013_01_054 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejop_13059 crossref_primary_10_1177_2398212818810591 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2012_0123 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2014_04_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2016_12_013 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_14229 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12136_024_00611_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2016_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joep_2018_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2015_05_078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2016_05_074 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470218_2013_820762 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2014_00914 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_021_01510_9 crossref_primary_10_5334_joc_202 crossref_primary_10_1080_20445911_2011_617301 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2020_02_007 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2019_00017 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_01908 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2011_07_005 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph121012803 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph16132427 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_016_0803_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13164_020_00516_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_13041 crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_1245259 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2011_11_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2018_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogpsych_2011_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2013_08_009 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_024_04013_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1460_9568_2012_08104_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2020_104193 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsif_2015_0685 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2011_0417 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2012_0021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2018_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2011_0416 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2015_08_063 crossref_primary_10_3390_vision3040066 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_3456_13_2013 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0218251 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0266212 crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2017_1283427 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2019_102804 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41583_022_00670_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_018_0973_z crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_020_00838_w crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2014_00938 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1366728921000274 crossref_primary_10_1093_nc_niw005 crossref_primary_10_1177_0963721419848672 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01500 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_014_0693_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_phpr_12433 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470218_2015_1008020 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_psych_022423_032425 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11098_021_01629_w crossref_primary_10_1038_s44159_022_00030_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2015_08_022 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2014_00166 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0033291719002204 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2011_03_018 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_012_0314_y crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2465_13_2014 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_018_1452_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2023_105587 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_6489_11_2012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2016_09_056 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2014_01_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2023_108649 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1414219112 crossref_primary_10_1177_17470218241282659 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_014_0756_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conb_2013_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2023_105388 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_aan8871 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pneurobio_2021_102115 crossref_primary_10_53841_bpscog_2019_1_4_25 crossref_primary_10_1515_psych_2022_0006 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1080/00140137608931517 10.1037/h0022853 10.1126/science.280.5364.747 10.1007/BF00230048 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.1 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00630.x 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679 10.1038/35784 10.1037/0033-295X.83.5.375 10.1207/s15516709cog0601_1 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.009 10.3758/MC.38.4.474 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.657 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02442.x 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.303 10.1080/026432900380427 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1963.tb01326.x 10.7551/mitpress/3650.001.0001 10.1080/00140137808931800 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2010 American Association for the Advancement of Science 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2010, American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2010 American Association for the Advancement of Science – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2010, American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| DBID | FBQ AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QF 7QG 7QL 7QP 7QQ 7QR 7SC 7SE 7SN 7SP 7SR 7SS 7T7 7TA 7TB 7TK 7TM 7U5 7U9 8BQ 8FD C1K F28 FR3 H8D H8G H94 JG9 JQ2 K9. KR7 L7M L~C L~D M7N P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1190483 |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Aluminium Industry Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Ceramic Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Corrosion Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Electronics & Communications Abstracts Engineered Materials Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Materials Business File Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts METADEX Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Engineering Research Database Aerospace Database Copper Technical Reference Library AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Materials Research Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Civil Engineering Abstracts Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Materials Research Database Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Materials Business File Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Aerospace Database Copper Technical Reference Library Engineered Materials Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Civil Engineering Abstracts Aluminium Industry Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Electronics & Communications Abstracts Ceramic Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts METADEX Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Entomology Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts Engineering Research Database Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Corrosion Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA Materials Research Database MEDLINE Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Sciences (General) Biology |
| EISSN | 1095-9203 |
| EndPage | 686 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 2172678581 21030660 23387226 10_1126_science_1190483 40931725 US201301904520 |
| Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Journal Article Feature |
| GroupedDBID | --- --Z -DZ -ET -~X .-4 ..I .55 .DC .GJ .GO .HR 0-V 08G 0B8 0R~ 0WA 123 186 18M 2FS 2KS 2WC 2XV 34G 36B 39C 3EH 3R3 3V. 4.4 41~ 42X 4R4 53G 5RE 63O 66. 68V 692 6OB 6TJ 79B 7X2 7X7 7XC 7~K 85S 88A 88E 88I 8AF 8CJ 8F7 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8GL 8WZ 97F A6W AABCJ AACGO AADHG AAFWJ AAIKC AAJYS AAKAS AAMNW AANCE AAWTO AAYJJ AAYOK ABBHK ABCQX ABDBF ABDEX ABEFU ABIVO ABJCF ABOCM ABPLY ABPMR ABPPZ ABPTK ABQIJ ABTAH ABTLG ABUWG ABWJO ABZEH ACBEA ACBEC ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACMJI ACNCT ACPRK ACQAM ACQOY ACTDY ADBBV ADDRP ADMHC ADULT ADZCM ADZLD AEGBM AENEX AETEA AEUPB AEXZC AFCHL AFDAS AFFDN AFFNX AFHKK AFKRA AFOSN AFQFN AFRAH AGCDD AGFXO AGNAY AGSOS AHMBA AIDAL AIDUJ AJGZS AJUXI ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI ANJGP ARALO ARAPS ASPBG ATCPS AVWKF AZQEC B-7 BBNVY BBWZM BCU BEC BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKF BKNYI BKSAR BLC BPHCQ BVXVI C2- C45 C51 CCPQU CJNVE CS3 D0S D1I D1J D1K DB2 DCCCD DNJUQ DOOOF DU5 DWIUU DWQXO D~A EAU EBS EGS EJD EMOBN ESX EWM EX3 F20 F5P FA8 FBQ FEDTE FYUFA G8K GICCO GNUQQ GUQSH GX1 HCIFZ HGD HMCUK HQ3 HTVGU HVGLF HZ~ I.T IAG IAO IBG IEA IEP IER IGG IGS IH2 IHR INH INR IOF IOV IPC IPO IPY ISE ISN ISR ITC J5H J9C JAAYA JBMMH JCF JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSG JSODD JST K-O K6- K9- KB. KCC KQ8 L6V L7B LK5 LK8 LPU LSO LU7 M0K M0L M0P M0R M1P M2O M2P M2Q M7P M7R M7S MQT MVM N4W N9A NEJ NHB O9- OCB OFXIZ OGEVE OK1 OMK OVD P-O P2P P62 PATMY PCBAR PDBOC PK8 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PV9 PYCSY PZZ QJJ QS- R05 RHF RHI RNS RXW RZL SA0 SC5 SJFOW SJN SKT TAE TEORI TN5 TWZ UBW UBY UCV UHB UHU UKHRP UKR UMD UNMZH UQL USG VOH VQA VVN WH7 WI4 WOQ WOW X7L X7M XFK XIH XJF XKJ XOL XZL Y6R YCJ YJ6 YK4 YKV YNT YOJ YR2 YRY YSQ YV5 YWH YXB YYP YYQ YZZ ZA5 ZCA ZCF ZCG ZE2 ZGI ZKG ZVL ZVM ZXP ZY4 ~02 ~G0 ~H1 ~KM ~ZZ ABDQB ABJNI ABXSQ ACHIC ACUHS ADQXQ ADUKH ADXHL AFBNE ALIPV AQVQM IPSME YR5 AAYXX CITATION ABDPE AEUYN AFQQW IQODW PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQEDU PQGLB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM UIG 7QF 7QG 7QL 7QP 7QQ 7QR 7SC 7SE 7SN 7SP 7SR 7SS 7T7 7TA 7TB 7TK 7TM 7U5 7U9 8BQ 8FD C1K F28 FR3 H8D H8G H94 JG9 JQ2 K9. KR7 L7M L~C L~D M7N P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-9f97920e5a971f3c6f2bf6285a4d5f659bf36746bc16f6f4fc3b7125fea8af683 |
| ISSN | 0036-8075 1095-9203 |
| IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 23:46:20 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:37:27 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 11:31:31 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:49:53 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:49 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:18:08 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:11:45 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 03 21:21:18 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:18:57 EST 2023 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6004 |
| Keywords | Human Error detection Cognition Typist Experimental study Cognitive control |
| Language | English |
| License | CC BY 4.0 |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c530t-9f97920e5a971f3c6f2bf6285a4d5f659bf36746bc16f6f4fc3b7125fea8af683 |
| Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 21030660 |
| PQID | 759916213 |
| PQPubID | 1256 |
| PageCount | 4 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_817605302 proquest_miscellaneous_762020121 proquest_miscellaneous_2000413933 proquest_journals_759916213 pubmed_primary_21030660 pascalfrancis_primary_23387226 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_1190483 crossref_citationtrail_10_1126_science_1190483 jstor_primary_40931725 fao_agris_US201301904520 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2010-10-29 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-10-29 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2010 text: 2010-10-29 day: 29 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Washington, DC |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Washington, DC – name: United States – name: Washington |
| PublicationTitle | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Science |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science The American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| Publisher_xml | – name: American Association for the Advancement of Science – name: The American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| References | e_1_3_2_9_2 e_1_3_2_15_2 e_1_3_2_8_2 e_1_3_2_16_2 e_1_3_2_7_2 e_1_3_2_17_2 e_1_3_2_6_2 e_1_3_2_18_2 e_1_3_2_19_2 e_1_3_2_20_2 e_1_3_2_10_2 e_1_3_2_21_2 e_1_3_2_5_2 e_1_3_2_11_2 e_1_3_2_4_2 e_1_3_2_12_2 e_1_3_2_23_2 e_1_3_2_3_2 e_1_3_2_13_2 e_1_3_2_24_2 e_1_3_2_2_2 e_1_3_2_14_2 |
| References_xml | – ident: e_1_3_2_20_2 doi: 10.1080/00140137608931517 – ident: e_1_3_2_2_2 doi: 10.1037/h0022853 – ident: e_1_3_2_8_2 doi: 10.1126/science.280.5364.747 – ident: e_1_3_2_19_2 doi: 10.1007/BF00230048 – ident: e_1_3_2_3_2 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.1 – ident: e_1_3_2_5_2 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931 – ident: e_1_3_2_7_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00630.x – ident: e_1_3_2_9_2 – ident: e_1_3_2_4_2 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679 – ident: e_1_3_2_13_2 doi: 10.1038/35784 – ident: e_1_3_2_17_2 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.83.5.375 – ident: e_1_3_2_16_2 doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0601_1 – ident: e_1_3_2_23_2 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.009 – ident: e_1_3_2_18_2 doi: 10.3758/MC.38.4.474 – ident: e_1_3_2_15_2 doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.657 – ident: e_1_3_2_6_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x – ident: e_1_3_2_11_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02442.x – ident: e_1_3_2_10_2 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.303 – ident: e_1_3_2_24_2 doi: 10.1080/026432900380427 – ident: e_1_3_2_12_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1963.tb01326.x – ident: e_1_3_2_14_2 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/3650.001.0001 – ident: e_1_3_2_21_2 doi: 10.1080/00140137808931800 |
| SSID | ssj0009593 |
| Score | 2.3626928 |
| Snippet | The ability to detect errors is an essential component of cognitive control. Studies of error detection in humans typically use simple tasks and propose... Even the most able typist makes errors, and Logan and Crump (p. 683 ) have used this real-world task to probe for the existence of two error-detection... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref jstor fao |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 683 |
| SubjectTerms | Authorship attribution Biological and medical sciences Blame Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognition. Intelligence Computer Peripherals Confidence interval Control loops dissociation Errors Experimental psychology Experimentation Feedback Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Illusion Illusions Miscellaneous Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor Performance Questionnaires Task Performance and Analysis Theory Typing Typing service Writing |
| Title | Cognitive Illusions of Authorship Reveal Hierarchical Error Detection in Skilled Typists |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40931725 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21030660 https://www.proquest.com/docview/759916213 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000413933 https://www.proquest.com/docview/762020121 https://www.proquest.com/docview/817605302 |
| Volume | 330 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Bb9MwFLa6TkhcEBuMhcFkJA5DKJPjOE5z7ApjmoALq9RbcFJ7TJRmatID_Hreix03AyoBl6iNHafq98V5z37vfYS8TMFMlnOFGoBChEKU8zArDTiuikVYa0WVbZ3tDx_lxVRczpLZYPC5F7W0borT8scf80r-B1U4B7hiluw_IOsHhRPwGfCFIyAMx7_CeOJjf24Wi3XdxbSpdfOlasOTMTMFKwej4HW7ZYCI6NWqQlnwRpddpGP9FVMC57ggC7DXfYu1e_jBEvW7Oz1MfZji2AYTdLEF7rLeQsP76toutr4Dfxcu9KHGkxVQyuYNtdrjry_d0q1bjMDADha6gbSdQBlqP3IW92fY2G29WCpJxkRvypRWyOb3qbwnPqnha4bF7_s9AYvbby2yHLXSpNUl-KV6dte0Q3Y5OBJ8SHbHZ2_Ozu8UZnYln3rJVN392lrRdoQ7hsuOUVUXwYrhtKoG_IyVQtnuq7Q2y9VD8sA5G3RsmbNHBnq5T-5Z-dHv-2TPgVTTE1d9_NUjMvOkop5UtDJ0QypqSUX7pKItqagnFb1ZUkcq6kj1mEzP315NLkInvxGWScyaMDNZCkjqRGVpZOJSGl4YzLhVYp4YmWSFiWUqZFFG0kgjTBkXKdjLRquRMgDrARkuq6U-JNQILOONCXNGiUxHiqfGRKnOkniegsUekNPuv81LV5seJVIWeeujcpk7XHKHS0BO_AW3tizL9q6HAFauruGlmU8_cdyqx5aEs4ActAj6IQTLwJ7mSUCO70DqO_A4HgGLZECOOoxzNyHUeZqgs8UjuOUL3wqzNW7BqaWu1jWKvjIwG7MY-tAtfcA8AR8u4tH2LqMolQz1vgLyxBJs8wsdXZ9ubTki9zeP7jMybFZr_Rws66Y4dg_HT0yzza0 |
| linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive+illusions+of+authorship+reveal+hierarchical+error+detection+in+skilled+typists&rft.jtitle=Science+%28American+Association+for+the+Advancement+of+Science%29&rft.au=Logan%2C+Gordon+D&rft.au=Crump%2C+Matthew+J+C&rft.date=2010-10-29&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft.volume=330&rft.issue=6004&rft.spage=683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126%2Fscience.1190483&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F21030660&rft.externalDocID=21030660 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0036-8075&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0036-8075&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0036-8075&client=summon |