Sensory Integration Does Not Lead to Sensory Calibration
One generally has the impression that one feels one's hand at the same location as one sees it. However, because our brain deals with possibly conflicting visual and proprioceptive information about hand position by combining it into an optimal estimate of the hand's location, mutual calib...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 103; no. 49; pp. 18781 - 18786 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
05.12.2006
National Acad Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | One generally has the impression that one feels one's hand at the same location as one sees it. However, because our brain deals with possibly conflicting visual and proprioceptive information about hand position by combining it into an optimal estimate of the hand's location, mutual calibration is not necessary to achieve such a coherent percept. Does sensory integration nevertheless entail sensory calibration? We asked subjects to move their hand between visual targets. Blocks of trials without any visual feedback about their hand's position were alternated with blocks with veridical visual feedback. Whenever vision was removed, individual subjects' hands slowly drifted toward the same position to which they had drifted on previous blocks without visual feedback. The time course of the observed drift depended in a predictable manner (assuming optimal sensory combination) on the variable errors in the blocks with and without visual feedback. We conclude that the optimal use of unaligned sensory information, rather than changes within either of the senses or an accumulation of execution errors, is the cause of the frequently observed movement drift. The conclusion that seeing one's hand does not lead to an alignment between vision and proprioception has important consequences for the interpretation of previous work on visuomotor adaptation. |
---|---|
AbstractList | One generally has the impression that one feels one's hand at the same location as one sees it. However, because our brain deals with possibly conflicting visual and proprioceptive information about hand position by combining it into an optimal estimate of the hand's location, mutual calibration is not necessary to achieve such a coherent percept. Does sensory integration nevertheless entail sensory calibration? We asked subjects to move their hand between visual targets. Blocks of trials without any visual feedback about their hand's position were alternated with blocks with veridical visual feedback. Whenever vision was removed, individual subjects' hands slowly drifted toward the same position to which they had drifted on previous blocks without visual feedback. The time course of the observed drift depended in a predictable manner (assuming optimal sensory combination) on the variable errors in the blocks with and without visual feedback. We conclude that the optimal use of unaligned sensory information, rather than changes within either of the senses or an accumulation of execution errors, is the cause of the frequently observed movement drift. The conclusion that seeing one's hand does not lead to an alignment between vision and proprioception has important consequences for the interpretation of previous work on visuomotor adaptation. One generally has the impression that one feels one's hand at the same location as one sees it. However, because our brain deals with possibly conflicting visual and proprioceptive information about hand position by combining it into an optimal estimate of the hand's location, mutual calibration is not necessary to achieve such a coherent percept. Does sensory integration nevertheless entail sensory calibration? We asked subjects to move their hand between visual targets. Blocks of trials without any visual feedback about their hand's position were alternated with blocks with veridical visual feedback. Whenever vision was removed, individual subjects' hands slowly drifted toward the same position to which they had drifted on previous blocks without visual feedback. The time course of the observed drift depended in a predictable manner (assuming optimal sensory combination) on the variable errors in the blocks with and without visual feedback. We conclude that the optimal use of unaligned sensory information, rather than changes within either of the senses or an accumulation of execution errors, is the cause of the frequently observed movement drift. The conclusion that seeing one's hand does not lead to an alignment between vision and proprioception has important consequences for the interpretation of previous work on visuomotor adaptation. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] One generally has the impression that one feels one's hand at the same location as one sees it. However, because our brain deals with possibly conflicting visual and proprioceptive information about hand position by combining it into an optimal estimate of the hand's location, mutual calibration is not necessary to achieve such a coherent percept. Does sensory integration nevertheless entail sensory calibration? We asked subjects to move their hand between visual targets. Blocks of trials without any visual feedback about their hand's position were alternated with blocks with veridical visual feedback. Whenever vision was removed, individual subjects' hands slowly drifted toward the same position to which they had drifted on previous blocks without visual feedback. The time course of the observed drift depended in a predictable manner (assuming optimal sensory combination) on the variable errors in the blocks with and without visual feedback. We conclude that the optimal use of unaligned sensory information, rather than changes within either of the senses or an accumulation of execution errors, is the cause of the frequently observed movement drift. The conclusion that seeing one's hand does not lead to an alignment between vision and proprioception has important consequences for the interpretation of previous work on visuomotor adaptation.One generally has the impression that one feels one's hand at the same location as one sees it. However, because our brain deals with possibly conflicting visual and proprioceptive information about hand position by combining it into an optimal estimate of the hand's location, mutual calibration is not necessary to achieve such a coherent percept. Does sensory integration nevertheless entail sensory calibration? We asked subjects to move their hand between visual targets. Blocks of trials without any visual feedback about their hand's position were alternated with blocks with veridical visual feedback. Whenever vision was removed, individual subjects' hands slowly drifted toward the same position to which they had drifted on previous blocks without visual feedback. The time course of the observed drift depended in a predictable manner (assuming optimal sensory combination) on the variable errors in the blocks with and without visual feedback. We conclude that the optimal use of unaligned sensory information, rather than changes within either of the senses or an accumulation of execution errors, is the cause of the frequently observed movement drift. The conclusion that seeing one's hand does not lead to an alignment between vision and proprioception has important consequences for the interpretation of previous work on visuomotor adaptation. One generally has the impression that one feels one's hand at the same location as one sees it. However, because our brain deals with possibly conflicting visual and proprioceptive information about hand position by combining it into an optimal estimate of the hand's location, mutual calibration is not necessary to achieve such a coherent percept. Does sensory integration nevertheless entail sensory calibration? We asked subjects to move their hand between visual targets. Blocks of trials without any visual feedback about their hand's position were alternated with blocks with veridical visual feedback. Whenever vision was removed, individual subjects' hands slowly drifted toward the same position to which they had drifted on previous blocks without visual feedback. The time course of the observed drift depended in a predictable manner (assuming optimal sensory combination) on the variable errors in the blocks with and without visual feedback. We conclude that the optimal use of unaligned sensory information, rather than changes within either of the senses or an accumulation of execution errors, is the cause of the frequently observed movement drift. The conclusion that seeing one's hand does not lead to an alignment between vision and proprioception has important consequences for the interpretation of previous work on visuomotor adaptation. adaptation motor control vision proprioception drift |
Author | van Beers, Robert J. Brenner, Eli de Grave, Denise D. J. Smeets, Jeroen B. J. van den Dobbelsteen, John J. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jeroen B. J. surname: Smeets fullname: Smeets, Jeroen B. J. – sequence: 2 givenname: John J. surname: van den Dobbelsteen fullname: van den Dobbelsteen, John J. – sequence: 3 givenname: Denise D. J. surname: de Grave fullname: de Grave, Denise D. J. – sequence: 4 givenname: Robert J. surname: van Beers fullname: van Beers, Robert J. – sequence: 5 givenname: Eli surname: Brenner fullname: Brenner, Eli |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17130453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALFdFt4cwJFHFA6iHtTPx9QUIL_ZBW5QCcLSdxSlZZe7EdRP89WXa7hUpVTz7MM6_GM0fkwAfvCHmNcIog6dna23QKAqRQEoE-IzMEjaVgGg7IDKCSpWIVOyRHKS0BQHMFL8ghSqTAOJ0R9dX5FOJtceWzu4k298EXn4JLxXXIxcLZtsihuENzO_T1Fr0kzzs7JPdq9x6T7-efv80vy8WXi6v5x0XZcAq5FGhl7ZjqKHUO6qbl0HLNqsZJC1R01NqGYmeFogKZVpq3Qtd6sqhr7Gp6TD5sc9djvXJt43yOdjDr2K9svDXB9ub_iu9_mJvwy6DQVFI9BbzfBcTwc3Qpm1WfGjcM1rswJiNUVUms5JMQNa8QBUzw3QO4DGP00xZMBUi5YmyD3v47937gu9VPgG9BE0NK0XWm6fPf1U7f6AeDYDYnNpsTm_sTT31nD_r20Y92FLtRNoV7TQ3TBpVUOJGTJ4jpxmHI7nee7JutXaYc4h5TAI6ogf4BgiLKNA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2020_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_020_05775_1 crossref_primary_10_1093_mind_fzu089 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00517_2018 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00317_2019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2016_03_011 crossref_primary_10_1080_00222895_2015_1015674 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00633_2017 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_01620 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_0623_10_2011 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0952523812000053 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_76220_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9973_2011_01688_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2013_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2014_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00053_2023 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00980_2007 crossref_primary_10_1167_18_11_15 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_009_2076_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2013_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2015_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0074236 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_023_06685_8 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0117901 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0219635215500168 crossref_primary_10_1123_mc_2021_0070 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00204_2011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2009_07_057 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00478_2022 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01171 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_017_0248_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_008_1527_1 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnint_2019_00063 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_011_2738_4 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0060196 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00845_2012 crossref_primary_10_1068_p6788 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0129065724500370 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_01008_2009 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_22_12_14 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_016_4815_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_015_4205_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2009_06_025 crossref_primary_10_1080_00222895_2018_1468311 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00314_2012 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0025214 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2010_07_017 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00206_2016 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00493_2022 crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006620965133 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_011_2934_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_014_4086_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_011_2786_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jelekin_2011_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2015_03_028 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00005_2014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2013_01_021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_009_1928_9 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_34311_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_018_5186_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_007_1135_5 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00340 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00635_2011 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_90961_2008 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0064332 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00326_2013 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00112_2013 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1384_24_2024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2013_05_051 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2016_2613443 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2010_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_46625_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0158709 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0004214 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_015_4456_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_008_1680_6 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00439_2014 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00641_2010 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2015_01692 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2019_02995 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2023_137335 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00507_2007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2020_11_012 crossref_primary_10_1027_2151_2604_a000084 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_012_3011_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_015_4523_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2021_11_010 crossref_primary_10_1523_ENEURO_0357_23_2024 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10015_018_0504_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_00222895_2022_2134287 crossref_primary_10_1163_22134808_bja10032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2008_12_039 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_015_4403_9 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0150912 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_014_4064_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2016_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2008_12_038 crossref_primary_10_1080_00222895_2018_1528435 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00237_2009 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0049373 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_022_06352_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humov_2007_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00291_2014 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00743_2010 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_019_05515_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_022_06503_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_019_05546_7 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00706_2012 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_90544_2008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_011_2965_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_33290_0 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_78063_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_014_3978_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2021_03_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2019_104170 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2020_104326 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsif_2017_0816 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humov_2014_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_03010066251314181 crossref_primary_10_1080_17588920903490939 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00123_2019 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00652_2007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cophys_2021_01_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2009_05_014 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_022_06436_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_009_1798_1 crossref_primary_10_1109_THMS_2016_2604571 crossref_primary_10_1177_0301006619861876 crossref_primary_10_1162_PRES_a_00161 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_018_5366_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2008_02_041 crossref_primary_10_1080_00222895_2013_778813 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0019377 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00032_2015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_018_5456_3 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00514_2009 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_958513 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_011_2822_9 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_22_1_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_03_034 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_009_1737_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2013_09_026 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2021_774448 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10514_011_9226_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_newideapsych_2012_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_00222895_2012_659232 crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awz187 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhn233 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2011_2166808 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_21_4_10 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00337_2018 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_023_06658_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_015_4242_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_011_2981_8 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_23_5_11 |
Cites_doi | 10.1152/jn.00013.2003 10.1177/027836498600500404 10.1007/s00221-003-1708-x 10.1007/s00221-002-1321-4 10.1152/jn.00652.2003 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10418 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01948-4 10.1007/BF00230024 10.1037/h0036325 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00836-9 10.1007/s002210000473 10.1152/jn.2000.84.5.2703 10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01266-2 10.1038/nn1427 10.1038/nn1480 10.1007/s002210050890 10.1152/jn.00725.2004 10.1016/S0149-7634(98)00004-9 10.1109/MPRV.2003.1228524 10.1007/BF00227302 10.1038/nrn873 10.1037/h0055392 10.1163/156856803322467581 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.011 10.1038/71140 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.004 10.1007/s00221-003-1601-7 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01493-5 10.1152/jn.00764.2003 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00449-4 10.1007/s002210050525 10.1152/jn.1999.81.3.1355 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright 2006 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Copyright National Academy of Sciences Dec 5, 2006 2006 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2006 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright 2006 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America – notice: Copyright National Academy of Sciences Dec 5, 2006 – notice: 2006 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2006 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7QL 7QP 7QR 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TK 7TM 7TO 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 M7N P64 RC3 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0607687103 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Immunology Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Technology Research Database Nucleic Acids Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Immunology Abstracts Engineering Research Database Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Neurosciences Abstracts CrossRef Virology and AIDS Abstracts MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Sciences (General) |
EISSN | 1091-6490 |
EndPage | 18786 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC1693739 1176653521 17130453 10_1073_pnas_0607687103 103_49_18781 30051190 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study Feature |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 .GJ 0R~ 123 29P 2AX 2FS 2WC 3O- 4.4 53G 5RE 5VS 85S AACGO AAFWJ AANCE AAYJJ ABBHK ABOCM ABPLY ABPPZ ABTLG ABXSQ ABZEH ACGOD ACHIC ACIWK ACNCT ACPRK ADQXQ ADULT ADXHL AENEX AEUPB AEXZC AFFNX AFOSN AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQVQM AS~ BKOMP CS3 D0L DCCCD DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P FRP GX1 H13 HH5 HQ3 HTVGU HYE IPSME JAAYA JBMMH JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSG JST KQ8 L7B LU7 MVM N9A N~3 O9- OK1 P-O PNE PQQKQ R.V RHI RNA RNS RPM RXW SA0 SJN TAE TN5 UKR W8F WH7 WHG WOQ WOW X7M XSW Y6R YBH YKV YSK ZCA ZCG ~02 ~KM - 02 0R 1AW 55 AAPBV ABFLS ABPTK ADACO ADZLD AJYGW AS ASUFR DNJUQ DOOOF DWIUU DZ F20 GJ JSODD KM PQEST RHF VQA X XFK XHC ZA5 AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM VXZ YIF YIN 7QG 7QL 7QP 7QR 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TK 7TM 7TO 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 M7N P64 RC3 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-61a7be48f33ee0bcd50d5942ce7a036f3aac31fa6836149895d69b9ee019b1fb3 |
ISSN | 0027-8424 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 17:39:01 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:05:29 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 24 03:33:58 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 08:38:33 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:47:07 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:50:25 EDT 2025 Thu May 30 08:51:21 EDT 2019 Wed Nov 11 00:29:21 EST 2020 Thu May 29 08:42:38 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 49 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c530t-61a7be48f33ee0bcd50d5942ce7a036f3aac31fa6836149895d69b9ee019b1fb3 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 Present address: Department Physics of Man, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, NL-3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Edited by Dale Purves, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and approved October 9, 2006 Author contributions: J.B.J.S. and J.J.v.d.D. designed research; J.B.J.S., D.D.J.d.G., and R.J.v.B. performed research; J.B.J.S. and R.J.v.B. analyzed data; and J.B.J.S., R.J.v.B., and E.B. wrote the paper. Present address: Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, NL-2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands. |
OpenAccessLink | http://hdl.handle.net/1765/63485 |
PMID | 17130453 |
PQID | 201358440 |
PQPubID | 42026 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1073_pnas_0607687103 jstor_primary_30051190 proquest_miscellaneous_68227127 proquest_journals_201358440 proquest_miscellaneous_19521160 pnas_primary_103_49_18781 pubmed_primary_17130453 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1693739 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_0607687103 pnas_primary_103_49_18781_fulltext |
ProviderPackageCode | RNA PNE CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2006-12-05 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-12-05 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2006 text: 2006-12-05 day: 05 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Washington |
PublicationTitle | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A |
PublicationYear | 2006 |
Publisher | National Academy of Sciences National Acad Sciences |
Publisher_xml | – name: National Academy of Sciences – name: National Acad Sciences |
References | e_1_3_4_3_2 e_1_3_4_2_2 e_1_3_4_1_2 Cuijpers RH (e_1_3_4_9_2) 2003; 47 e_1_3_4_8_2 e_1_3_4_7_2 e_1_3_4_6_2 e_1_3_4_5_2 e_1_3_4_4_2 e_1_3_4_22_2 e_1_3_4_23_2 e_1_3_4_20_2 e_1_3_4_21_2 e_1_3_4_26_2 e_1_3_4_27_2 e_1_3_4_24_2 e_1_3_4_25_2 e_1_3_4_28_2 e_1_3_4_29_2 e_1_3_4_30_2 e_1_3_4_11_2 e_1_3_4_34_2 e_1_3_4_12_2 e_1_3_4_33_2 e_1_3_4_32_2 e_1_3_4_10_2 e_1_3_4_31_2 e_1_3_4_15_2 e_1_3_4_16_2 e_1_3_4_13_2 e_1_3_4_14_2 e_1_3_4_19_2 e_1_3_4_17_2 e_1_3_4_18_2 12928763 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(2):266-74 9809311 - Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998 Oct;22(6):761-88 12858957 - Spat Vis. 2003;16(3-4):365-76 15951810 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jul;8(7):941-9 10859572 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jul;4(7):279-88 10591894 - Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(2):201-10 10468623 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10418-21 10085361 - J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1355-64 14615428 - J Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;90(5):3105-18 8891655 - Exp Brain Res. 1996 Sep;111(2):253-61 11068013 - J Neurophysiol. 2000 Nov;84(5):2703-8 9827856 - Exp Brain Res. 1998 Oct;122(4):367-77 12842033 - Curr Biol. 2003 Jul 1;13(13):R531-9 14561687 - J Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;91(2):1050-63 15793578 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Apr;8(4):490-7 12094211 - Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jul;3(7):553-62 4842283 - J Exp Psychol. 1974 Jun;102(6):1076-84 10607397 - Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):69-73 15477036 - J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):249-58 1301369 - Exp Brain Res. 1992;91(1):162-6 15356184 - J Neurophysiol. 2005 Feb;93(2):954-62 14999049 - J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;92(1):416-23 13174710 - J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(6):381-91 15820548 - Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 May;29(3):431-44 15541511 - Trends Neurosci. 2004 Dec;27(12):712-9 10234221 - Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jan;3(1):4-11 12140085 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Aug 1;6(8):345-350 15064885 - Exp Brain Res. 2004 Mar;155(1):56-62 11045361 - Exp Brain Res. 2000 Oct;134(3):363-77 12015120 - Curr Biol. 2002 May 14;12(10):834-7 12582830 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(4):471-81 |
References_xml | – volume: 47 start-page: 278 year: 2003 ident: e_1_3_4_9_2 publication-title: J MathPsychol – ident: e_1_3_4_18_2 doi: 10.1152/jn.00013.2003 – ident: e_1_3_4_10_2 doi: 10.1177/027836498600500404 – ident: e_1_3_4_15_2 doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1708-x – ident: e_1_3_4_12_2 doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1321-4 – ident: e_1_3_4_16_2 doi: 10.1152/jn.00652.2003 – ident: e_1_3_4_30_2 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10418 – ident: e_1_3_4_32_2 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01948-4 – ident: e_1_3_4_20_2 doi: 10.1007/BF00230024 – ident: e_1_3_4_23_2 doi: 10.1037/h0036325 – ident: e_1_3_4_34_2 doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00836-9 – ident: e_1_3_4_19_2 doi: 10.1007/s002210000473 – ident: e_1_3_4_22_2 doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.5.2703 – ident: e_1_3_4_6_2 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007 – ident: e_1_3_4_2_2 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01266-2 – ident: e_1_3_4_8_2 doi: 10.1038/nn1427 – ident: e_1_3_4_31_2 doi: 10.1038/nn1480 – ident: e_1_3_4_5_2 doi: 10.1007/s002210050890 – ident: e_1_3_4_28_2 doi: 10.1152/jn.00725.2004 – ident: e_1_3_4_3_2 doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(98)00004-9 – ident: e_1_3_4_11_2 doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2003.1228524 – ident: e_1_3_4_14_2 doi: 10.1007/BF00227302 – ident: e_1_3_4_27_2 doi: 10.1038/nrn873 – ident: e_1_3_4_21_2 doi: 10.1037/h0055392 – ident: e_1_3_4_29_2 doi: 10.1163/156856803322467581 – ident: e_1_3_4_33_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.011 – ident: e_1_3_4_24_2 doi: 10.1038/71140 – ident: e_1_3_4_25_2 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.004 – ident: e_1_3_4_17_2 doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1601-7 – ident: e_1_3_4_1_2 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01493-5 – ident: e_1_3_4_13_2 doi: 10.1152/jn.00764.2003 – ident: e_1_3_4_4_2 doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00449-4 – ident: e_1_3_4_26_2 doi: 10.1007/s002210050525 – ident: e_1_3_4_7_2 doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.3.1355 – reference: 10468623 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10418-21 – reference: 12140085 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Aug 1;6(8):345-350 – reference: 15477036 - J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):249-58 – reference: 4842283 - J Exp Psychol. 1974 Jun;102(6):1076-84 – reference: 15356184 - J Neurophysiol. 2005 Feb;93(2):954-62 – reference: 10859572 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jul;4(7):279-88 – reference: 15951810 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jul;8(7):941-9 – reference: 12842033 - Curr Biol. 2003 Jul 1;13(13):R531-9 – reference: 10085361 - J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1355-64 – reference: 11045361 - Exp Brain Res. 2000 Oct;134(3):363-77 – reference: 13174710 - J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(6):381-91 – reference: 12858957 - Spat Vis. 2003;16(3-4):365-76 – reference: 15541511 - Trends Neurosci. 2004 Dec;27(12):712-9 – reference: 12582830 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(4):471-81 – reference: 12928763 - Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(2):266-74 – reference: 1301369 - Exp Brain Res. 1992;91(1):162-6 – reference: 15793578 - Nat Neurosci. 2005 Apr;8(4):490-7 – reference: 9809311 - Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998 Oct;22(6):761-88 – reference: 10234221 - Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Jan;3(1):4-11 – reference: 14615428 - J Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;90(5):3105-18 – reference: 12094211 - Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jul;3(7):553-62 – reference: 8891655 - Exp Brain Res. 1996 Sep;111(2):253-61 – reference: 10607397 - Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):69-73 – reference: 12015120 - Curr Biol. 2002 May 14;12(10):834-7 – reference: 9827856 - Exp Brain Res. 1998 Oct;122(4):367-77 – reference: 14999049 - J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;92(1):416-23 – reference: 10591894 - Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(2):201-10 – reference: 14561687 - J Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;91(2):1050-63 – reference: 15820548 - Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 May;29(3):431-44 – reference: 11068013 - J Neurophysiol. 2000 Nov;84(5):2703-8 – reference: 15064885 - Exp Brain Res. 2004 Mar;155(1):56-62 |
SSID | ssj0009580 |
Score | 2.3238583 |
Snippet | One generally has the impression that one feels one's hand at the same location as one sees it. However, because our brain deals with possibly conflicting... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref pnas jstor |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 18781 |
SubjectTerms | Adaptation Adaptation, Physiological Behavioral neuroscience Biological Sciences Calibration Cubes Experimentation Hands Humans Integration Modeling Models, Neurological Neurons Predictive Value of Tests Proprioception Proprioception - physiology Senses Social Sciences Statistical discrepancies Visual perception Visual Perception - physiology |
Title | Sensory Integration Does Not Lead to Sensory Calibration |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/30051190 http://www.pnas.org/content/103/49/18781.abstract https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17130453 https://www.proquest.com/docview/201358440 https://www.proquest.com/docview/19521160 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68227127 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC1693739 |
Volume | 103 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWcuGCKFAI5REhDkWrLHHs2MmxRS0VKkulbqW9WXHiiEqQRU32wpFfzkzsPLba8rpEu8nESjJfZj7H8yDkTZhzFpVRHFDNYYIiRR6kkTBBmRvwPkUYpW262Ke5OL3kH5fxcjL5OYpaWjd6lv_YmlfyP1qFfaBXzJL9B832g8IO-A36hS1oGLZ_peMLmIPiGnlX8wFVWaxMPa1WDfaDKJBZ1k4IlIFT414RjpGe9x6s7uIF5t0HwsMh3cTZgHoaTM_nQ_Pii2_GNC4l7HplqulR_90ZE6PAqAFF1xoccGNcGgiG6vRCBYAUGyBZ01dd1Wa0oo8jHBnXxM2GgLszh88UGPIRj01vBO6Q24TpmbHWFshKILjtF9qb45CNcGfrmTrrShNp-7s4V43_xVY_AIYLmxdXWT0LBS42ym7YjYrb88_q5PLsTC2Ol4s75G4EUw3sgvFhSUeFmxObxuQuvysPJdm7G8NvMBsb3IoVc0Fo2-zlZhDuiNUsHpD7bjriH1ps7ZKJqR6S3U7Z_oGrSv72EUkc2PwR2HwEmw9g8xFsfrPyHdj8Edgek8uT48X708C13QjymIVNIGgmteFJyZgxoc6LOCzilEe5kRnwnZJlWc5omYmEAbdLkzQuRKpTkKWppqVme2SnWlXmKfFlZkrOC55FIgePXGpcy9M5TzhnPMlKj8y6R6ZyV5MeW6N8VW1shGQKH58anrFHDvoTvttyLLeL7rU66OWwMQMF_usRrxUdzmeKp6oFl0de33pMlS4cyyP7nTqVswa1AiLNgMxzGP5VfxRMNa6_ZZVZrWtFU-DKVPxGQgBdlzSSHnliwTFciKQY0wB3JTdg0wtgmfjNI9XVl7ZcPJZbkix99sfr2if3hjf3OdlprtfmBVDuRr9s34lfwknVGw |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory+integration+does+not+lead+to+sensory+calibration&rft.jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+National+Academy+of+Sciences+-+PNAS&rft.au=Smeets%2C+Jeroen+BJ&rft.au=van+den+Dobbelsteen%2C+John+J&rft.au=de+Grave%2C+Denise+DJ&rft.au=van+Beers%2C+Robert+J&rft.date=2006-12-05&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=49&rft.spage=18781&rft.epage=18786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073%2Fpnas.0607687103&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pnas.org%2Fcontent%2F103%2F49.cover.gif |
thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pnas.org%2Fcontent%2F103%2F49.cover.gif |