Objective assessment, repeatability, and agreement of shoulder ROM with a 3D gyroscope
Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
26.02.2013
BioMed Central Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-2474 1471-2474 |
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-72 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer.
Methods
The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test.
Results
Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from −7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from −9.07° to 11.46°.
Conclusion
In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10[degrees]. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP. Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°. In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP. Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. Methods The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Results Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from −7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from −9.07° to 11.46°. Conclusion In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP. Doc number: 72 Abstract Background: Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. Methods: The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Results: Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°. Conclusion: In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP. Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer.BACKGROUNDAssessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer.The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test.METHODSThe DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test.Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°.RESULTSEvaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°.In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.CONCLUSIONIn summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP. Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. Methods The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Results Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27[degrees] with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97[degrees] to 8.51[degrees]. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19[degrees] with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07[degrees] to 11.46[degrees]. Conclusion In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10[degrees]. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP. Keywords: Repeatability, Precision, Shoulder motion, Objective assessment, Dynaport, Gyroscope |
ArticleNumber | 72 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | El-Zayat, Bilal Farouk Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne Timmesfeld, Nina Efe, Turgay Schofer, Markus Dietmar Heidrich, Annett Anetsmann, Robert |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35033, Germany 2 Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg, Bunsenstraße 3, Marburg, 35037, Germany |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg, Bunsenstraße 3, Marburg, 35037, Germany – name: 1 Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35033, Germany |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Bilal Farouk surname: El-Zayat fullname: El-Zayat, Bilal Farouk email: elzayat@med.uni-marburg.de organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg – sequence: 2 givenname: Turgay surname: Efe fullname: Efe, Turgay organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg – sequence: 3 givenname: Annett surname: Heidrich fullname: Heidrich, Annett organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg – sequence: 4 givenname: Robert surname: Anetsmann fullname: Anetsmann, Robert organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg – sequence: 5 givenname: Nina surname: Timmesfeld fullname: Timmesfeld, Nina organization: Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg – sequence: 6 givenname: Susanne surname: Fuchs-Winkelmann fullname: Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg – sequence: 7 givenname: Markus Dietmar surname: Schofer fullname: Schofer, Markus Dietmar organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23442604$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kk1v1DAQhi1URD_gzA1Z4sKhaf2VeH1BqkoLSEUrIeBqOc4461USL3ZStP8eR9uWbUXlg62Z533t8cwxOhjCAAi9peSM0kV1ToWkBRNSFFQUkr1ARw-Rg73zITpOaU0IlQuuXqFDxoVgFRFH6NeyXoMd_S1gkxKk1MMwnuIIGzCjqX3nx-0pNkODTRsB5iwODqdVmLoGIv6-_Ib_-HGFDeafcLuNIdmwgdfopTNdgjd3-wn6eX314_JLcbP8_PXy4qawJVNjYTg4bpxksOBMKVaKmgvHGkbKxtSNJBWTUjAliXNcKKkop5QpZ0vqpICKn6CPO9_NVPfQ2Py8aDq9ib43cauD8fpxZvAr3YZbzSsqSj4bfLgziOH3BGnUvU8Wus4MEKakKWdcqkyqjL5_gq7DFIdc3kxljJZi8Y9qTQfaDy7ke-1sqi9KLiq2IJRl6uw_VF4N9N7mHjuf448E7_YLfajwvpMZKHeAzS1IEZy2fjSjD3PdvtOU6Hli9DwTep6JfNJyNj5_oru3fl5BdoqUyaGFuPcPz0j-Askhzbw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_016_0957_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_015_0507_4 crossref_primary_10_5535_arm_2019_43_6_707 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11517_016_1537_2 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0156696 crossref_primary_10_2196_rehab_4101 crossref_primary_10_3390_s23146445 crossref_primary_10_1080_14763141_2019_1671486 crossref_primary_10_2196_14468 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jos_2017_04_010 crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4028822 crossref_primary_10_3233_PPR_190142 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0262730 crossref_primary_10_3390_s21227690 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0129398 |
Cites_doi | 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.341 10.2519/jospt.1991.14.1.37 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00106-5 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.031 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.6.329 10.1097/00003086-199602000-00014 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00072-8 10.1186/1471-2474-5-18 10.1186/1471-2474-12-168 10.1177/036354659001800202 10.1055/s-2007-965468 10.1186/1471-2474-11-135 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9 10.3109/09593980903094230 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818ff636 10.2202/1557-4679.1107 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright © 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. – notice: Copyright © 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QP 7RV 7TK 7TS 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. KB0 M0S M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-72 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China Physical Education Index ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1471-2474 |
EndPage | 72 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC3614536 2933206381 A534628012 23442604 10_1186_1471_2474_14_72 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Germany Netherlands Hague Netherlands |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany – name: Hague Netherlands – name: Netherlands |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 4.4 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPNFZ ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7QP 7TK 7TS 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a3ef3af72e83299254b34f2d205dabd70627742970ff34979131129fc51f74e63 |
IEDL.DBID | U2A |
ISSN | 1471-2474 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 17:44:10 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 19:20:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 02:19:23 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:05:31 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:03:10 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:46:00 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:48 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:29:11 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Repeatability Objective assessment Gyroscope Dynaport Precision Shoulder motion |
Language | English |
License | http://www.springer.com/tdm This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c529t-a3ef3af72e83299254b34f2d205dabd70627742970ff34979131129fc51f74e63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://link.springer.com/10.1186/1471-2474-14-72 |
PMID | 23442604 |
PQID | 1322371548 |
PQPubID | 44767 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3614536 proquest_miscellaneous_1323795369 proquest_journals_1322371548 gale_infotracmisc_A534628012 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A534628012 pubmed_primary_23442604 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1471_2474_14_72 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_14_72 springer_journals_10_1186_1471_2474_14_72 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-02-26 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-02-26 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2013 text: 2013-02-26 day: 26 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | BMC musculoskeletal disorders |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Musculoskelet Disord |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Musculoskelet Disord |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd |
References | El-Zayat, Efe, Heidrich, Wolf, Timmesfeld, Heyse, Lakemeier, Fuchs-Winkelmann, Schofer (CR6) 2011; 12 Faber HvH, van Ipenburg, van Lummel (CR7) 2006 Bernmark, Wiktorin (CR1) 2002; 33 Terwee, de Winter, Scholten, Jans, Deville, van Schaardenburg, Bouter (CR3) 2005; 86 Van Hees, Slootmaker, De Groot, Van Mechelen, Van Lummel (CR5) 2009; 41 Uswatte, Miltner, Foo, Varma, Moran, Taub (CR2) 2000; 31 Hayes, Walton, Szomor, Murrell (CR11) 2001; 47 Chan, Maffulli, Nobuhara, Wu (CR14) 1996; 323 Barnett, Duncan, Johnson (CR10) 1999; 14 Mullaney, McHugh, Johnson, Tyler (CR12) 2010; 26 Carstensen, Simpson, Gurrin (CR9) 2008; 4 Frisiello, Gazaille, O’Halloran, Palmer, Waugh (CR15) 1994; 19 de Winter, Heemskerk, Terwee, Jans, Deville, van Schaardenburg, Scholten, Bouter (CR4) 2004; 5 Greenfield, Donatelli, Wooden, Wilkes (CR13) 1990; 18 Michael, Gross, Phillips, Ann Wray (CR17) 1991; 13 Raiss, Rettig, Wolf, Loew, Kasten (CR18) 2007; 145 Theisen, van Wagensveld, Timmesfeld, Efe, Heyse, Fuchs-Winkelmann, Schofer (CR8) 2010; 11 Molczyk, Thigpen, Eickhoff, Goldgar, Gallagher (CR16) 1991; 14 ND Barnett (1690_CR10) 1999; 14 KM Chan (1690_CR14) 1996; 323 MJ Mullaney (1690_CR12) 2010; 26 VT Van Hees (1690_CR5) 2009; 41 K Hayes (1690_CR11) 2001; 47 G Uswatte (1690_CR2) 2000; 31 AF de Winter (1690_CR4) 2004; 5 CB Terwee (1690_CR3) 2005; 86 BF El-Zayat (1690_CR6) 2011; 12 E Bernmark (1690_CR1) 2002; 33 L Molczyk (1690_CR16) 1991; 14 T Michael (1690_CR17) 1991; 13 P Raiss (1690_CR18) 2007; 145 H Faber HvH (1690_CR7) 2006 C Theisen (1690_CR8) 2010; 11 B Carstensen (1690_CR9) 2008; 4 S Frisiello (1690_CR15) 1994; 19 BH Greenfield (1690_CR13) 1990; 18 20557263 - Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Jul;26(5):327-33 22462118 - Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):Article 16 21777447 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:168 2343977 - Am J Sports Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):124-8 18796831 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;14(1):37-41 10700501 - Stroke. 2000 Mar;31(3):662-7 17912671 - Z Orthop Unfall. 2007 Jul-Aug;145(4):493-8 10619117 - Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 May;14(4):287-90 11722295 - Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(4):289-94 8025574 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Jun;19(6):341-4 15196309 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 Jun 14;5:18 16003664 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1356-61 20587014 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:135 12507338 - Appl Ergon. 2002 Nov;33(6):541-7 19276852 - Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Apr;41(4):810-7 8625565 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Feb;(323):106-12 |
References_xml | – volume: 19 start-page: 341 issue: 6 year: 1994 end-page: 344 ident: CR15 article-title: Test-retest reliability of eccentric peak torque values for shoulder medial and lateral rotation using the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.341 – volume: 14 start-page: 37 issue: 1 year: 1991 end-page: 41 ident: CR16 article-title: Reliability of testing the knee extensors and flexors in healthy adult women using a Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.14.1.37 – volume: 14 start-page: 287 issue: 4 year: 1999 end-page: 290 ident: CR10 article-title: The measurement of three dimensional scapulohumeral kinematics–a study of reliability publication-title: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00106-5 – volume: 86 start-page: 1356 issue: 7 year: 2005 end-page: 1361 ident: CR3 article-title: Interobserver reproducibility of the visual estimation of range of motion of the shoulder publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.031 – volume: 13 start-page: 329 issue: 6 year: 1991 end-page: 335 ident: CR17 article-title: Intramachine and intermachine reliability of the Biodex and Cybex® II for knee flexion and extension peak torque and angular work publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.6.329 – volume: 323 start-page: 106 year: 1996 end-page: 112 ident: CR14 article-title: Shoulder instability in athletes. The Asian perspective publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1097/00003086-199602000-00014 – volume: 33 start-page: 541 issue: 6 year: 2002 end-page: 547 ident: CR1 article-title: A triaxial accelerometer for measuring arm movements publication-title: Appl Ergon doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00072-8 – volume: 5 start-page: 18 year: 2004 ident: CR4 article-title: Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-18 – volume: 12 start-page: 168 year: 2011 ident: CR6 article-title: Objective assessment of shoulder mobility with a new 3D gyroscope–a validation study publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-168 – volume: 18 start-page: 124 issue: 2 year: 1990 end-page: 128 ident: CR13 article-title: Isokinetic evaluation of shoulder rotational strength between the plane of scapula and the frontal plane publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/036354659001800202 – volume: 145 start-page: 493 issue: 4 year: 2007 end-page: 498 ident: CR18 article-title: Range of motion of shoulder and elbow in activities of daily life in 3D motion analysis publication-title: Z Orthop Unfall doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965468 – volume: 11 start-page: 135 year: 2010 ident: CR8 article-title: Co-occurrence of outlet impingement syndrome of the shoulder and restricted range of motion in the thoracic spine–a prospective study with ultrasound-based motion analysis publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-135 – volume: 4 start-page: Article 16 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: CR9 article-title: Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements publication-title: Int J Biostat – volume: 47 start-page: 289 issue: 4 year: 2001 end-page: 294 ident: CR11 article-title: Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion publication-title: Aust J Physiother doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9 – volume: 26 start-page: 327 issue: 5 year: 2010 end-page: 333 ident: CR12 article-title: Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level publication-title: Physiother Theory Pract doi: 10.3109/09593980903094230 – year: 2006 ident: CR7 article-title: Measurement of the Elevation and Rotation of the Humerus using a 3D Accelerometer publication-title: Congress of the Dutch Society of Arthroscopy – volume: 31 start-page: 662 issue: 3 year: 2000 end-page: 667 ident: CR2 article-title: Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662 – volume: 41 start-page: 810 issue: 4 year: 2009 end-page: 817 ident: CR5 article-title: Reproducibility of a triaxial seismic accelerometer (DynaPort) publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818ff636 – volume: 31 start-page: 662 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 1690_CR2 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662 – volume: 14 start-page: 37 issue: 1 year: 1991 ident: 1690_CR16 publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.14.1.37 – volume: 33 start-page: 541 issue: 6 year: 2002 ident: 1690_CR1 publication-title: Appl Ergon doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00072-8 – volume: 41 start-page: 810 issue: 4 year: 2009 ident: 1690_CR5 publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818ff636 – volume: 86 start-page: 1356 issue: 7 year: 2005 ident: 1690_CR3 publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.031 – volume: 5 start-page: 18 year: 2004 ident: 1690_CR4 publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-18 – volume: 47 start-page: 289 issue: 4 year: 2001 ident: 1690_CR11 publication-title: Aust J Physiother doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9 – volume: 26 start-page: 327 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 1690_CR12 publication-title: Physiother Theory Pract doi: 10.3109/09593980903094230 – volume: 323 start-page: 106 year: 1996 ident: 1690_CR14 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1097/00003086-199602000-00014 – volume: 145 start-page: 493 issue: 4 year: 2007 ident: 1690_CR18 publication-title: Z Orthop Unfall doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965468 – volume: 4 start-page: Article 16 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 1690_CR9 publication-title: Int J Biostat doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1107 – volume: 13 start-page: 329 issue: 6 year: 1991 ident: 1690_CR17 publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.6.329 – volume-title: Congress of the Dutch Society of Arthroscopy year: 2006 ident: 1690_CR7 – volume: 14 start-page: 287 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 1690_CR10 publication-title: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00106-5 – volume: 19 start-page: 341 issue: 6 year: 1994 ident: 1690_CR15 publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.341 – volume: 11 start-page: 135 year: 2010 ident: 1690_CR8 publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-135 – volume: 12 start-page: 168 year: 2011 ident: 1690_CR6 publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-168 – volume: 18 start-page: 124 issue: 2 year: 1990 ident: 1690_CR13 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/036354659001800202 – reference: 11722295 - Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(4):289-94 – reference: 12507338 - Appl Ergon. 2002 Nov;33(6):541-7 – reference: 10700501 - Stroke. 2000 Mar;31(3):662-7 – reference: 8025574 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Jun;19(6):341-4 – reference: 19276852 - Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Apr;41(4):810-7 – reference: 8625565 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Feb;(323):106-12 – reference: 20557263 - Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Jul;26(5):327-33 – reference: 17912671 - Z Orthop Unfall. 2007 Jul-Aug;145(4):493-8 – reference: 21777447 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:168 – reference: 22462118 - Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):Article 16 – reference: 15196309 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 Jun 14;5:18 – reference: 18796831 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;14(1):37-41 – reference: 16003664 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1356-61 – reference: 2343977 - Am J Sports Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):124-8 – reference: 10619117 - Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 May;14(4):287-90 – reference: 20587014 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:135 |
SSID | ssj0017839 |
Score | 2.1048656 |
Snippet | Background
Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments... Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for... Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments... Doc number: 72 Abstract Background: Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 72 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Agreements Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation Arthrometry, Articular - methods Arthrometry, Articular - standards Calibration Calibration - standards Comparative analysis Diagnosis Epidemiology Female Humans Internal Medicine Joints Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Mobility Musculoskeletal diseases Orthopedics physical therapy and occupational health Range of motion Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Rehabilitation Reproducibility of Results Research Article Rheumatology Shoulder Shoulder - physiology Shoulder injuries Software Sports Medicine Statistical analysis Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Jb9QwFH6CcuGCCmVJaZGREItU08RLHJ-qEVBVSKUSomhukRPbLahNhpnpYf49fk4mNCPgFsmLHL_92f4ewCtrRVEFz5um1ngqrDNUFyajUnKTFs7wqsI85OmX_ORcfJ7KaZ9wW_TXKtc6MSpq29aYIz_EqIkrdLCPZr8oVo3C09W-hMZduBehywI_q-kQcGUqWP8ezicr8sMsKGLKhBI0E1SxkSXa1Me3DNLmZcmNE9NoiI634UHvQZJJR_KHcMc1j2Bn0oTo-XpFXpN4pzMmy3fg-1n1s9NoxAwQnAdk7mZBBXcI3asDYhpLTIi7Y6aQtJ4sLrHwtZuTr2enBDO1xBD-kVysEPqynbnHcH786duHE9pXUqC1ZHpJDXeeG6-YCwKsdQgKKy48syyV1lRWIVZxiJG1Sr3nQiuNIDxM-1pmXgmX8yew1bSNewYkBITMapUZYbmQUlZZarK6LnwqTOFVmsD79a6WdQ8zjtUursoYbhR5iWQokQzhq1QsgbfDgFmHsPHvrm-QTCXKXpizNv0TgrAyRLEqJ5LjU9tgcxPYG_UMMlOPm9eELnuZXZR_OCyBl0MzjsR7aI1rb2IfrvDEWyfwtOOLYdGMC4T7FwmoEccMHRDJe9zS_LiMiN48OElh0gTerXnr1rL-vhe7__-F53CfxcIdjLJ8D7aW8xu3H9ynZfUiyshv1JMV-Q priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxQxFA7SgvgitvUyWksE8QJNO5PLZPIgZVFLEdaCuNK3ITNJrFJn63YL7r_3nMzstLOsD74NJBlCzvXL5TuEvHROFhVk3ix1NjDpvGWmsBlTSti08FZUFe5Djj_nJxP56Uyd3ZQD6hbwai20w3pSk9nFwZ_fiyMw-HfR4Iv8MAMHy7jUkmWSafDHmxCWckRiY3lzpKAhFei4fdYMGoSlVed8Kzqt3pxcOT6NUen4AbnfpZN01Mp_i9zxzTbZGTUApX8t6CsaL3jGnfNtcnfcnaPvkG-n1c_W01HbU3Pu05m_BNfcMncv9qltHLWAx-MOIp0GenWOBbH9jH45HVPcwaWWig_0-wIpMWHdHpLJ8cev709YV2GB1YqbObPCB2GD5h4M2xgAi5WQgTueKmcrp5HDGLCz0WkIQhptkJyHm1CrLGjpc_GIbDTTxj8hFIAid0ZnVjohlVJVltqsrouQSlsEnSbkYLnAZd3Rj2MVjIsywpAiL1EiJUoEvkrNE_KmH3DZMm_8u-trlFiJWgL_rG33tABmhuxW5UgJfIILsTghu4OeYEv1sHkp83KpiiXidaER2iXkRd-MI_F-WuOn17GP0HgSbhLyuFWRftJcSCwDIBOiB8rTd0CG72FL8-M8Mn0LSJ7gpwl5u1SzW9NavxZP_6PvM3KPx-oenPF8l2zMZ9f-OeRY82ov2s5f67Ye-Q priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Objective assessment, repeatability, and agreement of shoulder ROM with a 3D gyroscope |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2474-14-72 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23442604 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1322371548 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1323795369 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3614536 |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwED-NTUK8INj4CIzKSIgPaR6JP-LksZRNE1I3NFHUt8hJbAaCtOq6h_733DlptFbjgZcqlc-RlfPd-Xdn_wzwpq5VVuLKm8e19VzVzvI8swnXWto4c1aWJeUhx-fp2UR9merpDiTrszBht_u6JBk8dTDrLP2YoBvlQhnFE8UNet09jcCdbHEihn3hwGDA7xh87ui0EXy2XfCtGLS9P3KrSBpiz-kjeNgtGtmw1fJj2HHNPhwMGwTMf1bsLQvbOEN-fB_uj7tq-QF8vyh_tf6M2Z6A84gt3BwdcMvPvTpitqmZRdQd8oRs5tn1FV177Rbs8mLMKE_LLJOf2Y8VEV_O5u4JTE5Pvo3OeHePAq-0yJfcSuel9UY4NN88R0hYSuVFLWJd27I2xFSMCDk3sfdS5SYnCh6R-0on3iiXyqew28wa9xwYwkFR5yaxqpZKa10msU2qKvOxspk3cQTH6w9cVB3JON118bsIYCNLC9JIQRrBp8KICN73HeYtv8a_Rd-RxgqyPHxnZbsDBDgy4rAqhlrSQVuMuBEcbkiixVSbzWudF53FXheEyqUhABfB676ZetIutMbNboKMNFTvziN41k6RftBCKiL7VxGYjcnTCxCP92ZL8_Mq8HlLXCLhSyP4sJ5mt4Z197d48R-yL-GBCHd4CC7SQ9hdLm7cK1xJLcsB3DNTM4C9TyfnXy_x3ygdDUJWAn_HKhsE2_oLW48Zsg |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7QEuCCiPQAEj8ZRqmtjOOjkgtNBWW9rdoqqtegtObFMQJMvuVmj_FL8RT140K-DWWyQ_5HjG87S_AXiqtYhSZ3lTXytLhTaKxpEKaBhy5UdG8TTFOORo3B8eiw-n4ekK_GrewuC1ykYmloJaFxnGyDfRa-ISDey3kx8Uq0ZhdrUpoVGxxZ5Z_HQu2-zN7paj7zPGdraP3g9pXVWAZiGL51RxY7mykhnHzHHsHKSUC8s080OtUi0Rt9f5i7H0reUiljEC0rDYZmFgpTB97ua9AqsCX7T2YPXd9vjjYZu3kM7eqAGEgqi_GTjRT5mQggaCStbRfcsa4IIKXL6euZSjLVXfzg24XtusZFAx2U1YMfktWBvkzl__viDPSXmLtAzPr8HJQfq1kqFEtaCfG2RqJk7oV5jgiw2ick2U8_TL2CQpLJmdYaltMyWHByOCsWGiCN8inxcItllMzG04vpRdvgO9vMjNPSDOBWU6loESmoswDNPAV0GWRdYXKrLS9-B1s6tJVgObY32Nb0np4ET9BMmQIBncVyKZBy_bAZMK0-PfXV8gmRI87W7OTNWPFtzKEDcrGYQcH_c6Le_BeqenO6VZt7khdFJLiVnyh6c9eNI240i8-Zab4rzswyXm2GMP7lZ80S6acYEFBoQHssMxbQfEDu-25F_OSgxx7swyN6kHrxreurCsv-_F_f__wmO4Ojwa7Sf7u-O9B3CNlWVDGGX9dejNp-fmoTPe5umj-sQQ-HTZh_Q3JgNSUg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB6hIlVcELQ8AgWMhHhIdZv4EcfHVcuqPLZFiKLeLCe2KQiyq93tYf89niQbNaty4BbJY8vKeF6e8TcAr5wTRRk9b5o6G6hw3lJd2IxKyW1aeMvLEu8hJ6f5ybn4eCEvutqcxbrafZ2SbN80IEpTvTycudCKeJEfZlGlUiaUoJmgKmrg2wLtHuZq86M-iaCi8e_QfG6YNDBEm-r4mj3arJXcSJg2dmh8D-52DiQZtRy_D7d8vQO7ozoGz39W5DVpSjqbu_Id2J50mfNd-H5W_mp1G7E9GOc-mftZVMYtVvdqn9jaERsj8ObOkEwDWVxiC2w_J1_PJgTvbIkl_Jj8WCEI5nTmH8D5-P23oxPa9VSglWR6SS33gdugmI-irHUMD0suAnMslc6WTiFqcYyWtUpD4EIrjXA8TIdKZkEJn_OHsFVPa_8YSAwNmdMqs8JxIaUss9RmVVWEVNgiqDSBg_UPNlUHOI59L36bJvAocoMcMciR-GUUS-BtP2HWYm38m_QNcsygFMY1K9s9Jog7QzwrM5IcH91G65vA3oAySk81HF7z3HTSuzAYoXOFwVwCL_thnIkVabWfXjU0XGHuWyfwqD0i_aYZFwj8LxJQg8PTEyCm93Ck_nnZYHvz6C7FRRN4tz5m17Z187948h-0L2D7y_HYfP5w-ukp3GFNaw9GWb4HW8v5lX8WHaxl-bwRo79bSBue |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Objective+assessment%2C+repeatability%2C+and+agreement+of+shoulder+ROM+with+a+3D+gyroscope&rft.jtitle=BMC+musculoskeletal+disorders&rft.au=El-Zayat%2C+Bilal+Farouk&rft.au=Efe%2C+Turgay&rft.au=Heidrich%2C+Annett&rft.au=Anetsmann%2C+Robert&rft.date=2013-02-26&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-72&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_1471_2474_14_72 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |