Objective assessment, repeatability, and agreement of shoulder ROM with a 3D gyroscope

Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 72
Main Authors El-Zayat, Bilal Farouk, Efe, Turgay, Heidrich, Annett, Anetsmann, Robert, Timmesfeld, Nina, Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne, Schofer, Markus Dietmar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 26.02.2013
BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI10.1186/1471-2474-14-72

Cover

Abstract Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. Methods The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Results Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from −7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from −9.07° to 11.46°. Conclusion In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.
AbstractList Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10[degrees]. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.
Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°. In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.
Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. Methods The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Results Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from −7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from −9.07° to 11.46°. Conclusion In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.
Doc number: 72 Abstract Background: Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. Methods: The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Results: Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°. Conclusion: In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.
Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer.BACKGROUNDAssessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer.The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test.METHODSThe DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test.Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°.RESULTSEvaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27° with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97° to 8.51°. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19° with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07° to 11.46°.In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.CONCLUSIONIn summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10°. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP.
Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for objective measurements of shoulder mobility are available. The recently introduced DynaPort MiniMod TriGyro ShoulderTest-System (DP) was validated earlier in laboratory trials. We aimed to assess the precision (repeatability) and agreement of this instrument in human subjects, as compared to the conventional goniometer. Methods The DP is a small, light-weight, three-dimensional gyroscope that can be fixed on the distal upper arm, recording shoulder abduction, flexion, and rotation. Twenty-one subjects (42 shoulders) were included for analysis. Two subsequent assessments of the same subject with a 30-minute delay in testing of each shoulder were performed with the DP in two directions (flexion and abduction), and simultaneously correlated with the measurements of a conventional goniometer. All assessments were performed by one observer. Repeatability for each method was determined and compared as the statistical variance between two repeated measurements. Agreement was illustrated by Bland-Altman-Plots with 95% limits of agreement. Statistical analysis was performed with a linear mixed regression model. Variance for repeated measurements by the same method was also estimated and compared with the likelihood-ratio test. Results Evaluation of abduction showed significantly better repeatability for the DP compared to the conventional goniometer (error variance: DP = 0.89, goniometer = 8.58, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found for flexion (DP = 1.52, goniometer = 5.94, p = 0.09). Agreement assessment was performed for flexion for mean differences of 0.27[degrees] with 95% limit of agreement ranging from -7.97[degrees] to 8.51[degrees]. For abduction, the mean differences were 1.19[degrees] with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -9.07[degrees] to 11.46[degrees]. Conclusion In summary, DP demonstrated a high precision even higher than the conventional goniometer. Agreement between both methods is acceptable, with possible deviations of up to greater than 10[degrees]. Therefore, static measurements with DP are more precise than conventional goniometer measurements. These results are promising for routine clinical use of the DP. Keywords: Repeatability, Precision, Shoulder motion, Objective assessment, Dynaport, Gyroscope
ArticleNumber 72
Audience Academic
Author El-Zayat, Bilal Farouk
Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne
Timmesfeld, Nina
Efe, Turgay
Schofer, Markus Dietmar
Heidrich, Annett
Anetsmann, Robert
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35033, Germany
2 Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg, Bunsenstraße 3, Marburg, 35037, Germany
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg, Bunsenstraße 3, Marburg, 35037, Germany
– name: 1 Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35033, Germany
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Bilal Farouk
  surname: El-Zayat
  fullname: El-Zayat, Bilal Farouk
  email: elzayat@med.uni-marburg.de
  organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Turgay
  surname: Efe
  fullname: Efe, Turgay
  organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Annett
  surname: Heidrich
  fullname: Heidrich, Annett
  organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Robert
  surname: Anetsmann
  fullname: Anetsmann, Robert
  organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Nina
  surname: Timmesfeld
  fullname: Timmesfeld, Nina
  organization: Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Susanne
  surname: Fuchs-Winkelmann
  fullname: Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne
  organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Markus Dietmar
  surname: Schofer
  fullname: Schofer, Markus Dietmar
  organization: Department of Orthopaedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23442604$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kk1v1DAQhi1URD_gzA1Z4sKhaf2VeH1BqkoLSEUrIeBqOc4461USL3ZStP8eR9uWbUXlg62Z533t8cwxOhjCAAi9peSM0kV1ToWkBRNSFFQUkr1ARw-Rg73zITpOaU0IlQuuXqFDxoVgFRFH6NeyXoMd_S1gkxKk1MMwnuIIGzCjqX3nx-0pNkODTRsB5iwODqdVmLoGIv6-_Ib_-HGFDeafcLuNIdmwgdfopTNdgjd3-wn6eX314_JLcbP8_PXy4qawJVNjYTg4bpxksOBMKVaKmgvHGkbKxtSNJBWTUjAliXNcKKkop5QpZ0vqpICKn6CPO9_NVPfQ2Py8aDq9ib43cauD8fpxZvAr3YZbzSsqSj4bfLgziOH3BGnUvU8Wus4MEKakKWdcqkyqjL5_gq7DFIdc3kxljJZi8Y9qTQfaDy7ke-1sqi9KLiq2IJRl6uw_VF4N9N7mHjuf448E7_YLfajwvpMZKHeAzS1IEZy2fjSjD3PdvtOU6Hli9DwTep6JfNJyNj5_oru3fl5BdoqUyaGFuPcPz0j-Askhzbw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_016_0957_3
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_015_0507_4
crossref_primary_10_5535_arm_2019_43_6_707
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11517_016_1537_2
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0156696
crossref_primary_10_2196_rehab_4101
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23146445
crossref_primary_10_1080_14763141_2019_1671486
crossref_primary_10_2196_14468
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jos_2017_04_010
crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4028822
crossref_primary_10_3233_PPR_190142
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0262730
crossref_primary_10_3390_s21227690
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0129398
Cites_doi 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.341
10.2519/jospt.1991.14.1.37
10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00106-5
10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.031
10.2519/jospt.1991.13.6.329
10.1097/00003086-199602000-00014
10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00072-8
10.1186/1471-2474-5-18
10.1186/1471-2474-12-168
10.1177/036354659001800202
10.1055/s-2007-965468
10.1186/1471-2474-11-135
10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9
10.3109/09593980903094230
10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662
10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818ff636
10.2202/1557-4679.1107
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.
2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
– notice: Copyright © 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 El-Zayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7RV
7TK
7TS
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-72
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
Physical Education Index
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE

Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1471-2474
EndPage 72
ExternalDocumentID PMC3614536
2933206381
A534628012
23442604
10_1186_1471_2474_14_72
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Germany
Netherlands
Hague Netherlands
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Germany
– name: Hague Netherlands
– name: Netherlands
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
4.4
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPNFZ
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7QP
7TK
7TS
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a3ef3af72e83299254b34f2d205dabd70627742970ff34979131129fc51f74e63
IEDL.DBID U2A
ISSN 1471-2474
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 17:44:10 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 19:20:39 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 02:19:23 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:05:31 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:03:10 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:04:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:46:00 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:48 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:29:11 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Repeatability
Objective assessment
Gyroscope
Dynaport
Precision
Shoulder motion
Language English
License http://www.springer.com/tdm
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c529t-a3ef3af72e83299254b34f2d205dabd70627742970ff34979131129fc51f74e63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1186/1471-2474-14-72
PMID 23442604
PQID 1322371548
PQPubID 44767
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3614536
proquest_miscellaneous_1323795369
proquest_journals_1322371548
gale_infotracmisc_A534628012
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A534628012
pubmed_primary_23442604
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1471_2474_14_72
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_14_72
springer_journals_10_1186_1471_2474_14_72
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-02-26
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-02-26
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-02-26
  day: 26
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC musculoskeletal disorders
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Musculoskelet Disord
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Musculoskelet Disord
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
References El-Zayat, Efe, Heidrich, Wolf, Timmesfeld, Heyse, Lakemeier, Fuchs-Winkelmann, Schofer (CR6) 2011; 12
Faber HvH, van Ipenburg, van Lummel (CR7) 2006
Bernmark, Wiktorin (CR1) 2002; 33
Terwee, de Winter, Scholten, Jans, Deville, van Schaardenburg, Bouter (CR3) 2005; 86
Van Hees, Slootmaker, De Groot, Van Mechelen, Van Lummel (CR5) 2009; 41
Uswatte, Miltner, Foo, Varma, Moran, Taub (CR2) 2000; 31
Hayes, Walton, Szomor, Murrell (CR11) 2001; 47
Chan, Maffulli, Nobuhara, Wu (CR14) 1996; 323
Barnett, Duncan, Johnson (CR10) 1999; 14
Mullaney, McHugh, Johnson, Tyler (CR12) 2010; 26
Carstensen, Simpson, Gurrin (CR9) 2008; 4
Frisiello, Gazaille, O’Halloran, Palmer, Waugh (CR15) 1994; 19
de Winter, Heemskerk, Terwee, Jans, Deville, van Schaardenburg, Scholten, Bouter (CR4) 2004; 5
Greenfield, Donatelli, Wooden, Wilkes (CR13) 1990; 18
Michael, Gross, Phillips, Ann Wray (CR17) 1991; 13
Raiss, Rettig, Wolf, Loew, Kasten (CR18) 2007; 145
Theisen, van Wagensveld, Timmesfeld, Efe, Heyse, Fuchs-Winkelmann, Schofer (CR8) 2010; 11
Molczyk, Thigpen, Eickhoff, Goldgar, Gallagher (CR16) 1991; 14
ND Barnett (1690_CR10) 1999; 14
KM Chan (1690_CR14) 1996; 323
MJ Mullaney (1690_CR12) 2010; 26
VT Van Hees (1690_CR5) 2009; 41
K Hayes (1690_CR11) 2001; 47
G Uswatte (1690_CR2) 2000; 31
AF de Winter (1690_CR4) 2004; 5
CB Terwee (1690_CR3) 2005; 86
BF El-Zayat (1690_CR6) 2011; 12
E Bernmark (1690_CR1) 2002; 33
L Molczyk (1690_CR16) 1991; 14
T Michael (1690_CR17) 1991; 13
P Raiss (1690_CR18) 2007; 145
H Faber HvH (1690_CR7) 2006
C Theisen (1690_CR8) 2010; 11
B Carstensen (1690_CR9) 2008; 4
S Frisiello (1690_CR15) 1994; 19
BH Greenfield (1690_CR13) 1990; 18
20557263 - Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Jul;26(5):327-33
22462118 - Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):Article 16
21777447 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:168
2343977 - Am J Sports Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):124-8
18796831 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;14(1):37-41
10700501 - Stroke. 2000 Mar;31(3):662-7
17912671 - Z Orthop Unfall. 2007 Jul-Aug;145(4):493-8
10619117 - Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 May;14(4):287-90
11722295 - Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(4):289-94
8025574 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Jun;19(6):341-4
15196309 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 Jun 14;5:18
16003664 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1356-61
20587014 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:135
12507338 - Appl Ergon. 2002 Nov;33(6):541-7
19276852 - Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Apr;41(4):810-7
8625565 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Feb;(323):106-12
References_xml – volume: 19
  start-page: 341
  issue: 6
  year: 1994
  end-page: 344
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Test-retest reliability of eccentric peak torque values for shoulder medial and lateral rotation using the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer
  publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.341
– volume: 14
  start-page: 37
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  end-page: 41
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Reliability of testing the knee extensors and flexors in healthy adult women using a Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer
  publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.14.1.37
– volume: 14
  start-page: 287
  issue: 4
  year: 1999
  end-page: 290
  ident: CR10
  article-title: The measurement of three dimensional scapulohumeral kinematics–a study of reliability
  publication-title: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
  doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00106-5
– volume: 86
  start-page: 1356
  issue: 7
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1361
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Interobserver reproducibility of the visual estimation of range of motion of the shoulder
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.031
– volume: 13
  start-page: 329
  issue: 6
  year: 1991
  end-page: 335
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Intramachine and intermachine reliability of the Biodex and Cybex® II for knee flexion and extension peak torque and angular work
  publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.6.329
– volume: 323
  start-page: 106
  year: 1996
  end-page: 112
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Shoulder instability in athletes. The Asian perspective
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1097/00003086-199602000-00014
– volume: 33
  start-page: 541
  issue: 6
  year: 2002
  end-page: 547
  ident: CR1
  article-title: A triaxial accelerometer for measuring arm movements
  publication-title: Appl Ergon
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00072-8
– volume: 5
  start-page: 18
  year: 2004
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-18
– volume: 12
  start-page: 168
  year: 2011
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Objective assessment of shoulder mobility with a new 3D gyroscope–a validation study
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-168
– volume: 18
  start-page: 124
  issue: 2
  year: 1990
  end-page: 128
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Isokinetic evaluation of shoulder rotational strength between the plane of scapula and the frontal plane
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/036354659001800202
– volume: 145
  start-page: 493
  issue: 4
  year: 2007
  end-page: 498
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Range of motion of shoulder and elbow in activities of daily life in 3D motion analysis
  publication-title: Z Orthop Unfall
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965468
– volume: 11
  start-page: 135
  year: 2010
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Co-occurrence of outlet impingement syndrome of the shoulder and restricted range of motion in the thoracic spine–a prospective study with ultrasound-based motion analysis
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-135
– volume: 4
  start-page: Article 16
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements
  publication-title: Int J Biostat
– volume: 47
  start-page: 289
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  end-page: 294
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion
  publication-title: Aust J Physiother
  doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9
– volume: 26
  start-page: 327
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  end-page: 333
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level
  publication-title: Physiother Theory Pract
  doi: 10.3109/09593980903094230
– year: 2006
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Measurement of the Elevation and Rotation of the Humerus using a 3D Accelerometer
  publication-title: Congress of the Dutch Society of Arthroscopy
– volume: 31
  start-page: 662
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  end-page: 667
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter
  publication-title: Stroke
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662
– volume: 41
  start-page: 810
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  end-page: 817
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Reproducibility of a triaxial seismic accelerometer (DynaPort)
  publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc
  doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818ff636
– volume: 31
  start-page: 662
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  ident: 1690_CR2
  publication-title: Stroke
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662
– volume: 14
  start-page: 37
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  ident: 1690_CR16
  publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.14.1.37
– volume: 33
  start-page: 541
  issue: 6
  year: 2002
  ident: 1690_CR1
  publication-title: Appl Ergon
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00072-8
– volume: 41
  start-page: 810
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  ident: 1690_CR5
  publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc
  doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818ff636
– volume: 86
  start-page: 1356
  issue: 7
  year: 2005
  ident: 1690_CR3
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.031
– volume: 5
  start-page: 18
  year: 2004
  ident: 1690_CR4
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-18
– volume: 47
  start-page: 289
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: 1690_CR11
  publication-title: Aust J Physiother
  doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9
– volume: 26
  start-page: 327
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 1690_CR12
  publication-title: Physiother Theory Pract
  doi: 10.3109/09593980903094230
– volume: 323
  start-page: 106
  year: 1996
  ident: 1690_CR14
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1097/00003086-199602000-00014
– volume: 145
  start-page: 493
  issue: 4
  year: 2007
  ident: 1690_CR18
  publication-title: Z Orthop Unfall
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965468
– volume: 4
  start-page: Article 16
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 1690_CR9
  publication-title: Int J Biostat
  doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1107
– volume: 13
  start-page: 329
  issue: 6
  year: 1991
  ident: 1690_CR17
  publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.6.329
– volume-title: Congress of the Dutch Society of Arthroscopy
  year: 2006
  ident: 1690_CR7
– volume: 14
  start-page: 287
  issue: 4
  year: 1999
  ident: 1690_CR10
  publication-title: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
  doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00106-5
– volume: 19
  start-page: 341
  issue: 6
  year: 1994
  ident: 1690_CR15
  publication-title: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
  doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.6.341
– volume: 11
  start-page: 135
  year: 2010
  ident: 1690_CR8
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-135
– volume: 12
  start-page: 168
  year: 2011
  ident: 1690_CR6
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-168
– volume: 18
  start-page: 124
  issue: 2
  year: 1990
  ident: 1690_CR13
  publication-title: Am J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1177/036354659001800202
– reference: 11722295 - Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(4):289-94
– reference: 12507338 - Appl Ergon. 2002 Nov;33(6):541-7
– reference: 10700501 - Stroke. 2000 Mar;31(3):662-7
– reference: 8025574 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Jun;19(6):341-4
– reference: 19276852 - Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Apr;41(4):810-7
– reference: 8625565 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Feb;(323):106-12
– reference: 20557263 - Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Jul;26(5):327-33
– reference: 17912671 - Z Orthop Unfall. 2007 Jul-Aug;145(4):493-8
– reference: 21777447 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:168
– reference: 22462118 - Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):Article 16
– reference: 15196309 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 Jun 14;5:18
– reference: 18796831 - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;14(1):37-41
– reference: 16003664 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1356-61
– reference: 2343977 - Am J Sports Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;18(2):124-8
– reference: 10619117 - Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 May;14(4):287-90
– reference: 20587014 - BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:135
SSID ssj0017839
Score 2.1048656
Snippet Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments...
Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments for...
Background Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly sophisticated instruments...
Doc number: 72 Abstract Background: Assessment of shoulder mobility is essential for diagnosis and clinical follow-up of shoulder diseases. Only a few highly...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 72
SubjectTerms Adult
Agreements
Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation
Arthrometry, Articular - methods
Arthrometry, Articular - standards
Calibration
Calibration - standards
Comparative analysis
Diagnosis
Epidemiology
Female
Humans
Internal Medicine
Joints
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Mobility
Musculoskeletal diseases
Orthopedics
physical therapy and occupational health
Range of motion
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Research Article
Rheumatology
Shoulder
Shoulder - physiology
Shoulder injuries
Software
Sports Medicine
Statistical analysis
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Jb9QwFH6CcuGCCmVJaZGREItU08RLHJ-qEVBVSKUSomhukRPbLahNhpnpYf49fk4mNCPgFsmLHL_92f4ewCtrRVEFz5um1ngqrDNUFyajUnKTFs7wqsI85OmX_ORcfJ7KaZ9wW_TXKtc6MSpq29aYIz_EqIkrdLCPZr8oVo3C09W-hMZduBehywI_q-kQcGUqWP8ezicr8sMsKGLKhBI0E1SxkSXa1Me3DNLmZcmNE9NoiI634UHvQZJJR_KHcMc1j2Bn0oTo-XpFXpN4pzMmy3fg-1n1s9NoxAwQnAdk7mZBBXcI3asDYhpLTIi7Y6aQtJ4sLrHwtZuTr2enBDO1xBD-kVysEPqynbnHcH786duHE9pXUqC1ZHpJDXeeG6-YCwKsdQgKKy48syyV1lRWIVZxiJG1Sr3nQiuNIDxM-1pmXgmX8yew1bSNewYkBITMapUZYbmQUlZZarK6LnwqTOFVmsD79a6WdQ8zjtUursoYbhR5iWQokQzhq1QsgbfDgFmHsPHvrm-QTCXKXpizNv0TgrAyRLEqJ5LjU9tgcxPYG_UMMlOPm9eELnuZXZR_OCyBl0MzjsR7aI1rb2IfrvDEWyfwtOOLYdGMC4T7FwmoEccMHRDJe9zS_LiMiN48OElh0gTerXnr1rL-vhe7__-F53CfxcIdjLJ8D7aW8xu3H9ynZfUiyshv1JMV-Q
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1baxQxFA7SgvgitvUyWksE8QJNO5PLZPIgZVFLEdaCuNK3ITNJrFJn63YL7r_3nMzstLOsD74NJBlCzvXL5TuEvHROFhVk3ix1NjDpvGWmsBlTSti08FZUFe5Djj_nJxP56Uyd3ZQD6hbwai20w3pSk9nFwZ_fiyMw-HfR4Iv8MAMHy7jUkmWSafDHmxCWckRiY3lzpKAhFei4fdYMGoSlVed8Kzqt3pxcOT6NUen4AbnfpZN01Mp_i9zxzTbZGTUApX8t6CsaL3jGnfNtcnfcnaPvkG-n1c_W01HbU3Pu05m_BNfcMncv9qltHLWAx-MOIp0GenWOBbH9jH45HVPcwaWWig_0-wIpMWHdHpLJ8cev709YV2GB1YqbObPCB2GD5h4M2xgAi5WQgTueKmcrp5HDGLCz0WkIQhptkJyHm1CrLGjpc_GIbDTTxj8hFIAid0ZnVjohlVJVltqsrouQSlsEnSbkYLnAZd3Rj2MVjIsywpAiL1EiJUoEvkrNE_KmH3DZMm_8u-trlFiJWgL_rG33tABmhuxW5UgJfIILsTghu4OeYEv1sHkp83KpiiXidaER2iXkRd-MI_F-WuOn17GP0HgSbhLyuFWRftJcSCwDIBOiB8rTd0CG72FL8-M8Mn0LSJ7gpwl5u1SzW9NavxZP_6PvM3KPx-oenPF8l2zMZ9f-OeRY82ov2s5f67Ye-Q
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Objective assessment, repeatability, and agreement of shoulder ROM with a 3D gyroscope
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2474-14-72
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23442604
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1322371548
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1323795369
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3614536
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3db9MwED-NTUK8INj4CIzKSIgPaR6JP-LksZRNE1I3NFHUt8hJbAaCtOq6h_733DlptFbjgZcqlc-RlfPd-Xdn_wzwpq5VVuLKm8e19VzVzvI8swnXWto4c1aWJeUhx-fp2UR9merpDiTrszBht_u6JBk8dTDrLP2YoBvlQhnFE8UNet09jcCdbHEihn3hwGDA7xh87ui0EXy2XfCtGLS9P3KrSBpiz-kjeNgtGtmw1fJj2HHNPhwMGwTMf1bsLQvbOEN-fB_uj7tq-QF8vyh_tf6M2Z6A84gt3BwdcMvPvTpitqmZRdQd8oRs5tn1FV177Rbs8mLMKE_LLJOf2Y8VEV_O5u4JTE5Pvo3OeHePAq-0yJfcSuel9UY4NN88R0hYSuVFLWJd27I2xFSMCDk3sfdS5SYnCh6R-0on3iiXyqew28wa9xwYwkFR5yaxqpZKa10msU2qKvOxspk3cQTH6w9cVB3JON118bsIYCNLC9JIQRrBp8KICN73HeYtv8a_Rd-RxgqyPHxnZbsDBDgy4rAqhlrSQVuMuBEcbkiixVSbzWudF53FXheEyqUhABfB676ZetIutMbNboKMNFTvziN41k6RftBCKiL7VxGYjcnTCxCP92ZL8_Mq8HlLXCLhSyP4sJ5mt4Z197d48R-yL-GBCHd4CC7SQ9hdLm7cK1xJLcsB3DNTM4C9TyfnXy_x3ygdDUJWAn_HKhsE2_oLW48Zsg
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6V7QEuCCiPQAEj8ZRqmtjOOjkgtNBWW9rdoqqtegtObFMQJMvuVmj_FL8RT140K-DWWyQ_5HjG87S_AXiqtYhSZ3lTXytLhTaKxpEKaBhy5UdG8TTFOORo3B8eiw-n4ekK_GrewuC1ykYmloJaFxnGyDfRa-ISDey3kx8Uq0ZhdrUpoVGxxZ5Z_HQu2-zN7paj7zPGdraP3g9pXVWAZiGL51RxY7mykhnHzHHsHKSUC8s080OtUi0Rt9f5i7H0reUiljEC0rDYZmFgpTB97ua9AqsCX7T2YPXd9vjjYZu3kM7eqAGEgqi_GTjRT5mQggaCStbRfcsa4IIKXL6euZSjLVXfzg24XtusZFAx2U1YMfktWBvkzl__viDPSXmLtAzPr8HJQfq1kqFEtaCfG2RqJk7oV5jgiw2ick2U8_TL2CQpLJmdYaltMyWHByOCsWGiCN8inxcItllMzG04vpRdvgO9vMjNPSDOBWU6loESmoswDNPAV0GWRdYXKrLS9-B1s6tJVgObY32Nb0np4ET9BMmQIBncVyKZBy_bAZMK0-PfXV8gmRI87W7OTNWPFtzKEDcrGYQcH_c6Le_BeqenO6VZt7khdFJLiVnyh6c9eNI240i8-Zab4rzswyXm2GMP7lZ80S6acYEFBoQHssMxbQfEDu-25F_OSgxx7swyN6kHrxreurCsv-_F_f__wmO4Ojwa7Sf7u-O9B3CNlWVDGGX9dejNp-fmoTPe5umj-sQQ-HTZh_Q3JgNSUg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB6hIlVcELQ8AgWMhHhIdZv4EcfHVcuqPLZFiKLeLCe2KQiyq93tYf89niQbNaty4BbJY8vKeF6e8TcAr5wTRRk9b5o6G6hw3lJd2IxKyW1aeMvLEu8hJ6f5ybn4eCEvutqcxbrafZ2SbN80IEpTvTycudCKeJEfZlGlUiaUoJmgKmrg2wLtHuZq86M-iaCi8e_QfG6YNDBEm-r4mj3arJXcSJg2dmh8D-52DiQZtRy_D7d8vQO7ozoGz39W5DVpSjqbu_Id2J50mfNd-H5W_mp1G7E9GOc-mftZVMYtVvdqn9jaERsj8ObOkEwDWVxiC2w_J1_PJgTvbIkl_Jj8WCEI5nTmH8D5-P23oxPa9VSglWR6SS33gdugmI-irHUMD0suAnMslc6WTiFqcYyWtUpD4EIrjXA8TIdKZkEJn_OHsFVPa_8YSAwNmdMqs8JxIaUss9RmVVWEVNgiqDSBg_UPNlUHOI59L36bJvAocoMcMciR-GUUS-BtP2HWYm38m_QNcsygFMY1K9s9Jog7QzwrM5IcH91G65vA3oAySk81HF7z3HTSuzAYoXOFwVwCL_thnIkVabWfXjU0XGHuWyfwqD0i_aYZFwj8LxJQg8PTEyCm93Ck_nnZYHvz6C7FRRN4tz5m17Z187948h-0L2D7y_HYfP5w-ukp3GFNaw9GWb4HW8v5lX8WHaxl-bwRo79bSBue
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Objective+assessment%2C+repeatability%2C+and+agreement+of+shoulder+ROM+with+a+3D+gyroscope&rft.jtitle=BMC+musculoskeletal+disorders&rft.au=El-Zayat%2C+Bilal+Farouk&rft.au=Efe%2C+Turgay&rft.au=Heidrich%2C+Annett&rft.au=Anetsmann%2C+Robert&rft.date=2013-02-26&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1471-2474-14-72&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_1471_2474_14_72
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon