Afferent discharges from coronary arterial and ventricular receptors in anaesthetized dogs

• Published in: The Journal of physiology Vol. 472; no. 1; pp. 785 - 799
• Main Authors: Drinkhill, M J, Moore, J, Hainsworth, R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford The Physiological Society 01.12.1993; Blackwell
• Subjects: Afferent Pathways - drug effects; Afferent Pathways - physiology; Anesthesia; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Blood Pressure - physiology; Coronary Vessels - drug effects; Coronary Vessels - innervation; Coronary Vessels - physiology; Dogs; Electrophysiology; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Heart; Heart - drug effects; Heart - innervation; Heart - physiology; Heart Ventricles - drug effects; Heart Ventricles - innervation; Male; Reflex - drug effects; Reflex - physiology; Vagus Nerve - drug effects; Vagus Nerve - physiology; Ventricular Function; Ventricular Function, Left - drug effects; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology; Veratridine - pharmacology; Vertebrates: cardiovascular system; Heart; Fissipedia; Systolic pressure; Carnivora; Mechanoreceptor; Coronary artery; Discharge pattern; Myelinated nerve fiber; Vasodilation; Left ventricle; Vasomotricity; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Blood vessel; Aorta; Blood pressure; Circulatory system; Hemodynamics; Vagus nerve; Dog
• DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019973
• ISSN: 0022-3751

1. Previous work has shown that increases in aortic root pressure result in reflex vasodilation, and that this response is likely to result mainly from stimulation of receptors in the coronary arteries, although contribution from left ventricular receptors was not excluded. This investigation was undertaken to resolve this question and to determine the afferent nerve fibres likely to be involved in this reflex. 2. In chloralose-anaesthetized dogs a perfusion circuit was used which allowed us to change the pressures in: (a) the aortic root, coronary arteries and the left ventricle; (b) aortic root and coronary arteries at constant ventricular pressure; and (c) the left ventricle with mean (although not pulse) aortic pressure constant. Electrophysiological recordings were made from slips dissected from the vagus nerve which responded with an increase in discharge to either combined increases in the pressures, or to aortic root injections of veratridine. 3. Recordings were made from twenty-one vagal afferents. On the basis of their conduction velocities, eleven were classified as non-myelinated and ten as myelinated. 4. Three non-myelinated afferents responded to veratridine injections only, three to both veratridine and combined aortic root and ventricular pressure changes, and five to pressure changes only. Responses to pressure occurred only when ventricular systolic pressure exceeded 30 kPa. 5. None of the myelinated afferents responded to veratridine. All showed increases in discharge to combined increases in mean aortic root, coronary arterial and left ventricular systolic pressures, which would be graded over a range similar to that which caused reflex changes. All were more sensitive to changes in mean coronary pressure than to changes in ventricular systolic pressure. 6. We conclude that myelinated vagal afferent nerve fibres, which respond predominantly to changes in mean coronary arterial pressure, are likely to be responsible for the vasodilation to the changes in mean aortic root pressure previously reported. These fibres are probably attached to coronary arterial mechanoreceptors.