Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who re...
Saved in:
Published in | Cancer control Vol. 27; no. 1; p. 1073274820904700 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Los Angeles, CA
SAGE Publications
01.01.2020
Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; = .211 and log rank = 0.668; = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group. |
Author | Hu, Jia Chen, Dongni Chen, Youfang Wen, Zhesheng Hu, Yihuai |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dongni surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Dongni – sequence: 2 givenname: Yihuai surname: Hu fullname: Hu, Yihuai – sequence: 3 givenname: Youfang surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Youfang – sequence: 4 givenname: Jia surname: Hu fullname: Hu, Jia – sequence: 5 givenname: Zhesheng orcidid: 0000-0002-0065-7542 surname: Wen fullname: Wen, Zhesheng email: wenzhesheng@163.com |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048521$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9Uk1vEzEQXaEi2gbunJAlLlwW_LXxmgNSiAJUtGqlwHk1sb2Jo107tb1U-Tv8UpymBBoJTh553nuaefPOixPnnSmKlwS_JUSIdwQLRgWvKZaYC4yfFGekouOSskqe5Dq3y13_tDiPcY0xxZzxZ8Upy0VdUXJW_Jz6fgPBRu-Qb9H1kJTvTUQfTbozxqEr9dX4O4fAaTTPPwnNot-sYGlU8v0WWYfSyqBZp03otugGkjUuRdT6cEBCh-a3A_R-iGhqug5NISjrfA_v0QTdBL8xLtq0RXPlgymvIKmV0WjioNtGG58XT1voonnx8I6K759m36ZfysvrzxfTyWWpKlqnUupKKtZyvGBCS8J4vWBUt60cV4SZlhKJFaUaU6U0WwgDGhsAKQCTBXBG2ai42OtqD-tmE2wPYdt4sM39hw_LBkKyqjMNGInpQtdSMMLbWkjgFcVQ10AJr7LaqPiw19oMi95olT0J0D0SfdxxdtUs_Y9G7G40llngzYNA8LeDianpbVTZPHAm-9jkC3OSFxM4Q18fQdd-CNm8jOKC5YSQ--1e_T3RYZTfUcgAvAeo4GMMpj1ACG52aWuO05Yp4yOKsiknwO92st3_iOWeGHM8_oz7T_wvAw3llg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doac022 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2024_1436176 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13092104 crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000897 crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyac067 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2022_966518 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_023_04765_4 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/bjs.1800630403 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483 10.1007/s00535-008-2171-z 10.1002/sim.3697 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02333-X 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.89 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00227-4 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01353.x 10.3322/caac.21338 10.3322/caac.21492 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.040 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.084 10.1097/00000658-194206000-00004 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.175 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03332.x 10.1007/s11605-018-3999-z 10.1186/s40880-019-0368-6 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.039 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2877 10.1111/dote.12533 10.1002/jso.24024 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.307 10.1093/dote/doy128 10.1097/MD.0000000000014416 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2020 The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications Inc, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Common Licences |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2020 – notice: The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications Inc, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Common Licences |
DBID | AFRWT AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7TO 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1177/1073274820904700 |
DatabaseName | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database PubMed CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: AFRWT name: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1526-2359 1073-2748 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ae902bd897314f879a4520a88a2145a4 PMC7020469 32048521 10_1177_1073274820904700 10.1177_1073274820904700 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China grantid: 81871986 funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809 – fundername: ; grantid: 81871986 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29B 2WC 54M 5GY 6PF 7X7 8FI 8FJ AASGM AAWTL ABQXT ABUWG ABVFX ACARO ACDXX ACGFS ACROE ADBBV ADCBC ADOGD AENEX AEWDL AFCOW AFKRA AFKRG AFRWT AJUZI ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AUTPY AYAKG BAWUL BDDNI BENPR BPHCQ BSEHC BVXVI CCPQU DC. E3Z EBD EBS EMOBN F5P FRP FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW J8X K.F OK1 P2P P6G PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PV9 Q1R RNS ROL RPM SAUOL SCDPB SCNPE SFC SV3 TR2 UKHRP W2D XSB AAYXX ACHEB CITATION OVT 31X 53G AATBZ ACGZU ACSIQ AEWHI ARTOV C1A DIK DV7 EJD GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION ITC M4V M~E NPM RZL SFK SFT SGV SPP UDS 3V. 7TO 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO H94 K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-9d59c3f40b37d91348b32dff96513ef2190c22d02ccd3b7ead0eaa97a01ba4323 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1073-2748 1526-2359 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:16:57 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:25:14 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:32:42 EDT 2025 Sun Jun 29 12:44:09 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:59:14 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:18 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:33:31 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:37:39 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | esophageal squamous cell carcinoma older patients prognostic factor surgical approach |
Language | English |
License | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c528t-9d59c3f40b37d91348b32dff96513ef2190c22d02ccd3b7ead0eaa97a01ba4323 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-0065-7542 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473732132?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 32048521 |
PQID | 2473732132 |
PQPubID | 4450818 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ae902bd897314f879a4520a88a2145a4 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7020469 proquest_miscellaneous_2354151370 proquest_journals_2473732132 pubmed_primary_32048521 crossref_primary_10_1177_1073274820904700 crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_1073274820904700 sage_journals_10_1177_1073274820904700 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2020 text: 2020-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Los Angeles, CA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Los Angeles, CA – name: United States – name: Tampa – name: Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA |
PublicationTitle | Cancer control |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cancer Control |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications Sage Publications Ltd SAGE Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: Sage Publications Ltd – name: SAGE Publishing |
References | Markar, Karthikesalingam, Thrumurthy 2013; 26 Cijs, Verhoef, Steyerberg 2010; 90 Rice, Ishwaran, Hofstetter 2016; 29 Morita, Egashira, Yoshida 2008; 43 Li, Hu, Zhang 2018; 267 Yang, Shang, Yuan 2019; 23 Churchill, Sweet 1942; 115 Tapias, Muniappan, Wright 2013; 95 Finlayson, Fan, Birkmeyer 2007; 205 Bakhos, Salami, Kaiser 2019; 32 Zeng, Liang, Liu 2018; 10 Feng, Zong, Cao 2019; 39 Yang, Liu, Chen 2018; 36 Khullar, Jiang, Force 2015; 112 Zhao, Liu, Wei, Liu 2017; 22 Wang, Wei, Jiang 2019; 98 Twine, Lewis, Morgan 2009; 55 Kinugasa, Tachibana, Yoshimura 2001; 71 Li, Fang, Yu 2018; 10 Nishihira, Hirayama, Mori 1998; 175 Li, Wang, Xiaohui 2016; 9 McKeown 1976; 63 Chen, Zheng, Baade 2016; 66 Ruol, Portale, Zaninotto 2007; 133 Austin 2009; 28 Li, Xiang, Zhang 2015; 150 Bray, Ferlay, Soerjomataram 2018; 68 bibr21-1073274820904700 bibr4-1073274820904700 bibr26-1073274820904700 bibr12-1073274820904700 bibr5-1073274820904700 bibr18-1073274820904700 bibr9-1073274820904700 bibr3-1073274820904700 bibr25-1073274820904700 bibr22-1073274820904700 bibr17-1073274820904700 bibr13-1073274820904700 Li Y (bibr15-1073274820904700) 2016; 9 bibr8-1073274820904700 bibr2-1073274820904700 bibr10-1073274820904700 bibr23-1073274820904700 bibr7-1073274820904700 Zhao H (bibr16-1073274820904700) 2017; 22 bibr14-1073274820904700 bibr19-1073274820904700 bibr27-1073274820904700 bibr20-1073274820904700 bibr1-1073274820904700 bibr6-1073274820904700 bibr24-1073274820904700 bibr11-1073274820904700 |
References_xml | – volume: 9 start-page: 13007 issue: 7 year: 2016 end-page: 13013 article-title: Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients publication-title: Int J Clin Exp Med – volume: 150 start-page: 292 issue: 4 year: 2015 end-page: 298 article-title: Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: JAMA Surg – volume: 23 start-page: 225 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 231 article-title: Comparison of long-term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer after Ivor-Lewis, Mckeown, or sweet esophagectomy publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg – volume: 63 start-page: 259 year: 1976 end-page: 262 article-title: Total three-stage oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 55 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 52 article-title: The assessment of prognosis of surgically resected oesophageal cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined pathologically publication-title: Histopathology – volume: 22 start-page: 1540 issue: 6 year: 2017 end-page: 1546 article-title: Short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma publication-title: J BUON – volume: 66 start-page: 115 issue: 2 year: 2016 end-page: 132 article-title: Cancer statistics in China, 2015 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin – volume: 26 start-page: 250 issue: 3 year: 2013 end-page: 262 article-title: Systematic review and pooled analysis assessing the association between elderly age and outcome following surgical resection of esophageal malignancy publication-title: Dis Esophagus – volume: 205 start-page: 729 issue: 6 year: 2007 end-page: 734 article-title: Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – volume: 43 start-page: 345 issue: 5 year: 2008 end-page: 351 article-title: Esophagectomy in patients 80 years of age and older with carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus publication-title: J Gastroenterol – volume: 68 start-page: 394 issue: 6 year: 2018 end-page: 424 article-title: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin – volume: 90 start-page: 900 issue: 3 year: 2010 end-page: 907 article-title: Outcome of esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg – volume: 10 start-page: 2481 issue: 4 year: 2018 end-page: 2489 article-title: Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition) publication-title: J Thorac Dis – volume: 10 start-page: 448 issue: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 457 article-title: Esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a population-based study publication-title: J Thorac Dis – volume: 28 start-page: 3083 issue: 25 year: 2009 end-page: 3107 article-title: Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 98 start-page: e14416 issue: 6 year: 2019 article-title: Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a STROBE compliant study publication-title: Medicine (Baltimore) – volume: 71 start-page: 414 issue: 2 year: 2001 end-page: 418 article-title: Esophageal resection in elderly esophageal carcinoma patients: improvement in postoperative complications publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg – volume: 175 start-page: 47 issue: 1 year: 1998 end-page: 51 article-title: A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus publication-title: Am J Surg – volume: 36 start-page: 6 issue: 27 year: 2018 article-title: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): a phase III multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 39 start-page: 22 issue: 1 year: 2019 article-title: Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 global cancer statistics? publication-title: Cancer Commun (Lond) – volume: 29 start-page: 897 issue: 8 year: 2016 end-page: 905 article-title: Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals publication-title: Dis Esophagus – volume: 95 start-page: 1741 issue: 5 year: 2013 end-page: 1748 article-title: Short and long-term outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg – volume: 32 start-page: 1 issue: 10 year: 2019 end-page: 8 article-title: Outcomes of octogenarians with esophageal cancer: an analysis of the national cancer database publication-title: Dis Esophagus – volume: 115 start-page: 897 issue: 6 year: 1942 end-page: 920 article-title: Transthoracic resection of tumors of the stomach and esophagus publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 267 start-page: 826 issue: 5 year: 2018 end-page: 832 article-title: Extended right thoracic approach compared with limited left thoracic approach for patients with middle and lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: three-year survival of a prospective, randomized, open-label trial publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 133 start-page: 1186 issue: 5 year: 2007 end-page: 1192 article-title: Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg – volume: 112 start-page: 517 issue: 5 year: 2015 end-page: 523 article-title: Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus: a value-based comparison publication-title: J Surg Oncol – ident: bibr11-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630403 – ident: bibr27-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483 – ident: bibr4-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2171-z – ident: bibr13-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1002/sim.3697 – ident: bibr9-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02333-X – ident: bibr14-1073274820904700 doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.89 – ident: bibr23-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00227-4 – ident: bibr25-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01353.x – volume: 9 start-page: 13007 issue: 7 year: 2016 ident: bibr15-1073274820904700 publication-title: Int J Clin Exp Med – ident: bibr3-1073274820904700 doi: 10.3322/caac.21338 – ident: bibr1-1073274820904700 doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 – ident: bibr8-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.040 – ident: bibr5-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.084 – ident: bibr21-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1097/00000658-194206000-00004 – ident: bibr22-1073274820904700 doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.175 – ident: bibr24-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03332.x – ident: bibr19-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3999-z – ident: bibr2-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0368-6 – volume: 22 start-page: 1540 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: bibr16-1073274820904700 publication-title: J BUON – ident: bibr26-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.039 – ident: bibr18-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2877 – ident: bibr12-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1111/dote.12533 – ident: bibr10-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1002/jso.24024 – ident: bibr6-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.307 – ident: bibr7-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1093/dote/doy128 – ident: bibr17-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014416 – ident: bibr20-1073274820904700 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280 |
SSID | ssj0020434 |
Score | 2.2725434 |
Snippet | The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal... The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref sage |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1073274820904700 |
SubjectTerms | Esophageal cancer Esophagus Gastrointestinal surgery Medical prognosis Original Research Paper Patients Prognosis Squamous cell carcinoma Surgery |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQiFegoEFCSByiOrYTx721q60q0EKlpVJvke3YotI2W9jsoX-nv5SZJJvu8rxwtZ14ZH_2zNjjbxh7K41FN7mQuNKymKK-rlNbuiyNPEiL6j7LLb0dnn0qTs_Vh4v8YivVF8WE9fTA_cAd2GC4cHVJKZZULLWxKhfclqUljm3bMYGizts4U4OrxZVUd5eSuDVoie4XajvDlabXbFtKqOPq_52B-Wuc5FawV6d_Th6yB4PhCEe9wI_YvdA8ZreTMY0gLCN8XrcIoLCC4z76Cmb-Y0A3G2xTwxxLWphS2gL8vW-XVzdw2QAagDClVN2LGzjrSVZXgJbs2BI7nX9bWzoigElYLGBC6Yea5ZU9hCM4o8P8hgI7YE6MmOnMEg5q2LCdPGHnJ9Mvk9N0yLqQ-lyUbWrq3HgZFXdS13QvXzop6hhNkWcyRNzhuBei5sL7WjqNSOTBWqMtz5xVUsinbK9ZNuE5A-nyYAyipCijcrFwzlvNQ45KMSrvdcIONtNQ-YGSnDJjLKpsYCH_eeIS9n784rqn4_hL22Oa2bEdEWl3BQivaoBX9S94JWx_g4tqWN2rSigtsS905BP2ZqzGdUmXLbYJOCGVkDnaRpnUKMezHkajJJLYktFuSpjeAdiOqLs1zeXXjvtbE7YLk7B3BMU7kf40CC_-xyC8ZPcFHTN0J0_7bK_9vg6v0BZr3etu2f0AhPMt5w priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 dbid: AFRWT link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELfG9sILAvEVGMhICImHMMd24pgX1FWdJlBhopvYW2Q79pjUprCmD_13-Eu5y9coA8RTJceNT_bvcmff-XeEvBTawDY5E6BpSYjBXpexyW0SB-aFAXOfpAbvDk8_Zsdn8v15er5Dqv4uTDeDqzeYVgUSNR9r1G48jT7ogozwqwRsp8B6aSYVY-_W9aJoT7v7ohrYguHp9QIj2w7zITdxf7vtFtnjKktBkfdGR5-_nA5bNCbbODS8P8YBrgObN8bcMmQN3_-fnNSbuZa_JIw1NuzoLrnTOZ901KLlHtnx1X3yYzyUIqTLQD-ta5gMv6KHbQYXnboPHrbq1FQlnUFLTSdY-gBe7-rlYkMvKwpOJJ1gue_5hp60RK0rCt7w0BMGnX1fGzxmoGM_n9MxljCqlgvzlo7oCQYEKkwOoTNk1YynBrFU0p4x5QE5O5qcjo_jrnJD7FKe17EuU-1EkMwKVWJsP7eClyFomHPhA3wlmeO8ZNy5UlgFaGbeGK0MS6yRgouHZLdaVv4xocKmXmtAWpYHaUNmrTOK-RQMa5DOqYgc9MtQuI7WHKtrzIukYzL_feEi8nr4x7eW0uMffQ9xZYd-SMbdNCyvLopOtwvjNeO2zLEKmAy50kamnJk8N0gDb2RE9ntcFD2-Cy6VgLESwSPyYngMuo0BG1N5WJCCixT8q0QokONRC6NBEoGMy-B7RURtAWxL1O0n1eXXhj9cIc4zHZFXCMVrkf42CU_-t-NTcpvjcURzQrVPduurtX8GPlttn3eK9hPuwDto priority: 102 providerName: SAGE Publications |
Title | Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis |
URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1073274820904700 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048521 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473732132 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2354151370 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7020469 https://doaj.org/article/ae902bd897314f879a4520a88a2145a4 |
Volume | 27 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELdge-EFgfgqjMpICImHqI7txDEvqK1aTaCOat1E3yLHsWFSl2xr-rB_h7-UuyRNVz72VMlx0mvvzveZ3xHyXmgDYXIsQNNCH4C9zgOTZGHgmRMGzH0YGXx3eHYSH5_LL8to2Sbc1m1b5fZMrA_qvLSYIx9wqYQSHIKnz1fXAU6NwupqO0LjITlE6DJs6VLLXcDFZFNVBjEOIPpKdmXKAa7hEmeaSYXvt90xSzV6_79czr87J--0f9UWafqEPG5dSTpseP-UPHDFM_Jr3A0WpKWn3zYV_Dy3pqOmH4vO7FcHgTc1RU4XsFLRCQ4ygMfbqry8pRcFBZeQTnB49-qWzhvY1TUF37bbCV-6uN4YTBrQsVut6BgHEhXlpflEh3SO6f0CWz3oAjEyg5lBycjpFv_kOTmfTs7Gx0E7hyGwEU-qQOeRtsJLlgmVY6U-yQTPvddxFArn4cxjlvOccWtzkSmQTeaM0cqwMDNScPGCHBRl4V4RKrLIaQ1yEydeZj7OMmsUcxGYSS-tVT0y2LIhtS1IOc7KWKVhi0v-J-N65GN3x1UD0HHP3hFyttuH0Nr1QnnzI201NTVOM57lCc70kj5R2siIM5MkBkHdjeyRo61cpK2-r9OddPbIu-4yaCqWX0zhgCEpFxF4S6FQQMfLRow6SgTiJ4Mn1SNqT8D2SN2_Ulz8rNHAFcp5rHvkA4rijqT__Qmv76f_DXnEMaVQZ5mOyEF1s3Fvwe-qsn6tXH1yOJyefj-Dz9HkZH7ar7MYvwFKqSxw |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLam7gFeEIhbYYCRAImHqI7txAkSQmvp1NG1VHST9hYcx4FJXbKtqdD-Dj-A38g5uXXlsre9Ok5i-dx9jr9DyCsRagiTfQGS5qYO2OvE0UHsOimzQoO5dz2Nd4cnU390JD8de8db5FdzFwbLKhudWCrqJDd4Rt7jUgklOARPH87OHewahdnVpoVGxRZje_kDQrbl-_2PQN_XnO8NDwcjp-4q4BiPB4UTJl5oRCpZLFSCeecgFjxJ09D3XGFTkGBmOE8YNyYRsYKdZlbrUGnmxloKBDoAlb8tBYQyHbLdH05nX9oQj8kqjw2C40C8F6wToz0cwyHOQiYV3qi7YgjLfgH_cnL_rtW8UnBW2sC9u-RO7bzS3Yrb7pEtm90nPwdtK0Oap_TzqoANtUvaryrA6MSMLYT6VGcJncNIQYfYOgE-b4r89JKeZBScUDrEduGLSzqrgF6XFLzpdib8dH6-0nhMQQd2saADbIGU5af6Hd2lM0woZFhcQueIyulMNPJiQhvElQfk6EZo9JB0sjyzjwkVsWfDEDjVD1IZp34cG62Y9cAwp9IY1SW9hgyRqWHRsTvHInJrJPQ_Cdclb9s3zipIkGvm9pGy7TwE8y4H8otvUa0bIm1DxuMkwC5iMg1UqKXHmQ4CjTDyWnbJTsMXUa1hltFaHrrkZfsYdAMmfHRmgSARFx74Z65QsI5HFRu1KxGI2Ay-W5eoDQbbWOrmk-zke4k_rpDP_bBL3iArrpf0v014cv36X5Bbo8PJQXSwPx0_Jbc5HmiUZ1w7pFNcrOwz8PqK-HktapR8vWnp_g0Ph2bT |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1fb9MwELfQJiFeEIh_gQFGQkg8hDm2E8e8daXVYHRUdBN7i2zHhkldOtb0YV-HT8pdkmaUAeIpUnJJLrm73J3v8jtCXgptIE3OBFhaEmLw12VscpvEgXlhwN0nqcF_hyeH2f6x_HCSnnS9OfgvTPcGl2-wrQo4aj7WaN3nZdjtaoywVQKyKXBemknFIGPflhJc4xbZHow_fznqMy4m27Iy0Md4wlWd8to1NvxSA9__p5jzeuvkL_1fjUsa3yG3u1iSDlrh3yU3fHWP_Bj2kwXpItBPqxqezS_pXtuQRSfuwEPmTU1V0hnsqekIJxnA5V29OLukpxWFmJCOcHr3_JJOW9zVJYXgtqeEm86-rwyuGtChn8_pECcSVYsz85YO6BTX9yvs9aAzBMmMJwZVo6RrAJT75Hg8Ohrux90ghtilPK9jXabaiSCZFarEUn1uBS9D0FmaCB_go8cc5yXjzpXCKlBO5o3RyrDEGim4eEC2qkXlHxEqbOq1BsXJ8iBtyKx1RjGfgp8M0jkVkd21GArXoZTjsIx5kXTA5L8LLiKv-zPOW4SOf9DuoWR7OsTWbnYsLr4WnakWxmvGbZnjUC8ZcqWNTDkzeW4Q1d3IiOys9aJYq2vBpRJwL8jtI_KiPwymivUXU3kQSMFFCuFSIhTw8bBVo54TgQDKEEpFRG0o2Aarm0eq028NHLhCPc90RF6hKl6x9LeX8Ph_CZ-Tm9N34-Lj-8ODJ-QWx4WGZu1ph2zVFyv_FKKx2j7rbO4nAyop4Q |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Outcomes+Between+McKeown+and+Sweet+Esophagectomy+in+the+Elderly+Patients+for+Esophageal+Squamous+Cell+Carcinoma%3A+A+Propensity+Score-Matched+Analysis&rft.jtitle=Cancer+control&rft.au=Chen%2C+Dongni&rft.au=Hu%2C+Yihuai&rft.au=Chen%2C+Youfang&rft.au=Hu%2C+Jia&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.issn=1526-2359&rft.eissn=1526-2359&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1073274820904700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F1073274820904700&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1073-2748&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1073-2748&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1073-2748&client=summon |