Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer control Vol. 27; no. 1; p. 1073274820904700
Main Authors Chen, Dongni, Hu, Yihuai, Chen, Youfang, Hu, Jia, Wen, Zhesheng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2020
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.
The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.
The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; = .211 and log rank = 0.668; = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.
The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.
Author Hu, Jia
Chen, Dongni
Chen, Youfang
Wen, Zhesheng
Hu, Yihuai
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Thoracic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dongni
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Dongni
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yihuai
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Yihuai
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Youfang
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Youfang
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jia
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Jia
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Zhesheng
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0065-7542
  surname: Wen
  fullname: Wen, Zhesheng
  email: wenzhesheng@163.com
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048521$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Uk1vEzEQXaEi2gbunJAlLlwW_LXxmgNSiAJUtGqlwHk1sb2Jo107tb1U-Tv8UpymBBoJTh553nuaefPOixPnnSmKlwS_JUSIdwQLRgWvKZaYC4yfFGekouOSskqe5Dq3y13_tDiPcY0xxZzxZ8Upy0VdUXJW_Jz6fgPBRu-Qb9H1kJTvTUQfTbozxqEr9dX4O4fAaTTPPwnNot-sYGlU8v0WWYfSyqBZp03otugGkjUuRdT6cEBCh-a3A_R-iGhqug5NISjrfA_v0QTdBL8xLtq0RXPlgymvIKmV0WjioNtGG58XT1voonnx8I6K759m36ZfysvrzxfTyWWpKlqnUupKKtZyvGBCS8J4vWBUt60cV4SZlhKJFaUaU6U0WwgDGhsAKQCTBXBG2ai42OtqD-tmE2wPYdt4sM39hw_LBkKyqjMNGInpQtdSMMLbWkjgFcVQ10AJr7LaqPiw19oMi95olT0J0D0SfdxxdtUs_Y9G7G40llngzYNA8LeDianpbVTZPHAm-9jkC3OSFxM4Q18fQdd-CNm8jOKC5YSQ--1e_T3RYZTfUcgAvAeo4GMMpj1ACG52aWuO05Yp4yOKsiknwO92st3_iOWeGHM8_oz7T_wvAw3llg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doac022
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2024_1436176
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13092104
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000897
crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyac067
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2022_966518
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_023_04765_4
Cites_doi 10.1002/bjs.1800630403
10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483
10.1007/s00535-008-2171-z
10.1002/sim.3697
10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02333-X
10.21037/jtd.2018.01.89
10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00227-4
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01353.x
10.3322/caac.21338
10.3322/caac.21492
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.040
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.084
10.1097/00000658-194206000-00004
10.21037/jtd.2018.03.175
10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03332.x
10.1007/s11605-018-3999-z
10.1186/s40880-019-0368-6
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.039
10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2877
10.1111/dote.12533
10.1002/jso.24024
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.307
10.1093/dote/doy128
10.1097/MD.0000000000014416
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2020
The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications Inc, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Common Licences
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2020
– notice: The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications Inc, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Common Licences
DBID AFRWT
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7TO
7X7
7XB
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1177/1073274820904700
DatabaseName Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Publicly Available Content Database

PubMed
CrossRef


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: AFRWT
  name: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
  url: http://journals.sagepub.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1526-2359
1073-2748
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ae902bd897314f879a4520a88a2145a4
PMC7020469
32048521
10_1177_1073274820904700
10.1177_1073274820904700
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  grantid: 81871986
  funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 81871986
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29B
2WC
54M
5GY
6PF
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AASGM
AAWTL
ABQXT
ABUWG
ABVFX
ACARO
ACDXX
ACGFS
ACROE
ADBBV
ADCBC
ADOGD
AENEX
AEWDL
AFCOW
AFKRA
AFKRG
AFRWT
AJUZI
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
AUTPY
AYAKG
BAWUL
BDDNI
BENPR
BPHCQ
BSEHC
BVXVI
CCPQU
DC.
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EMOBN
F5P
FRP
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
J8X
K.F
OK1
P2P
P6G
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PV9
Q1R
RNS
ROL
RPM
SAUOL
SCDPB
SCNPE
SFC
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
XSB
AAYXX
ACHEB
CITATION
OVT
31X
53G
AATBZ
ACGZU
ACSIQ
AEWHI
ARTOV
C1A
DIK
DV7
EJD
GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION
ITC
M4V
M~E
NPM
RZL
SFK
SFT
SGV
SPP
UDS
3V.
7TO
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
H94
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-9d59c3f40b37d91348b32dff96513ef2190c22d02ccd3b7ead0eaa97a01ba4323
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1073-2748
1526-2359
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:16:57 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:25:14 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 03:32:42 EDT 2025
Sun Jun 29 12:44:09 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:59:14 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:18 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:33:31 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:37:39 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
older patients
prognostic factor
surgical approach
Language English
License This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c528t-9d59c3f40b37d91348b32dff96513ef2190c22d02ccd3b7ead0eaa97a01ba4323
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-0065-7542
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473732132?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 32048521
PQID 2473732132
PQPubID 4450818
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ae902bd897314f879a4520a88a2145a4
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7020469
proquest_miscellaneous_2354151370
proquest_journals_2473732132
pubmed_primary_32048521
crossref_primary_10_1177_1073274820904700
crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_1073274820904700
sage_journals_10_1177_1073274820904700
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Los Angeles, CA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Los Angeles, CA
– name: United States
– name: Tampa
– name: Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA
PublicationTitle Cancer control
PublicationTitleAlternate Cancer Control
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher SAGE Publications
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: SAGE Publications
– name: Sage Publications Ltd
– name: SAGE Publishing
References Markar, Karthikesalingam, Thrumurthy 2013; 26
Cijs, Verhoef, Steyerberg 2010; 90
Rice, Ishwaran, Hofstetter 2016; 29
Morita, Egashira, Yoshida 2008; 43
Li, Hu, Zhang 2018; 267
Yang, Shang, Yuan 2019; 23
Churchill, Sweet 1942; 115
Tapias, Muniappan, Wright 2013; 95
Finlayson, Fan, Birkmeyer 2007; 205
Bakhos, Salami, Kaiser 2019; 32
Zeng, Liang, Liu 2018; 10
Feng, Zong, Cao 2019; 39
Yang, Liu, Chen 2018; 36
Khullar, Jiang, Force 2015; 112
Zhao, Liu, Wei, Liu 2017; 22
Wang, Wei, Jiang 2019; 98
Twine, Lewis, Morgan 2009; 55
Kinugasa, Tachibana, Yoshimura 2001; 71
Li, Fang, Yu 2018; 10
Nishihira, Hirayama, Mori 1998; 175
Li, Wang, Xiaohui 2016; 9
McKeown 1976; 63
Chen, Zheng, Baade 2016; 66
Ruol, Portale, Zaninotto 2007; 133
Austin 2009; 28
Li, Xiang, Zhang 2015; 150
Bray, Ferlay, Soerjomataram 2018; 68
bibr21-1073274820904700
bibr4-1073274820904700
bibr26-1073274820904700
bibr12-1073274820904700
bibr5-1073274820904700
bibr18-1073274820904700
bibr9-1073274820904700
bibr3-1073274820904700
bibr25-1073274820904700
bibr22-1073274820904700
bibr17-1073274820904700
bibr13-1073274820904700
Li Y (bibr15-1073274820904700) 2016; 9
bibr8-1073274820904700
bibr2-1073274820904700
bibr10-1073274820904700
bibr23-1073274820904700
bibr7-1073274820904700
Zhao H (bibr16-1073274820904700) 2017; 22
bibr14-1073274820904700
bibr19-1073274820904700
bibr27-1073274820904700
bibr20-1073274820904700
bibr1-1073274820904700
bibr6-1073274820904700
bibr24-1073274820904700
bibr11-1073274820904700
References_xml – volume: 9
  start-page: 13007
  issue: 7
  year: 2016
  end-page: 13013
  article-title: Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients
  publication-title: Int J Clin Exp Med
– volume: 150
  start-page: 292
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  end-page: 298
  article-title: Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA Surg
– volume: 23
  start-page: 225
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  end-page: 231
  article-title: Comparison of long-term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer after Ivor-Lewis, Mckeown, or sweet esophagectomy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
– volume: 63
  start-page: 259
  year: 1976
  end-page: 262
  article-title: Total three-stage oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus
  publication-title: Br J Surg
– volume: 55
  start-page: 46
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 52
  article-title: The assessment of prognosis of surgically resected oesophageal cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined pathologically
  publication-title: Histopathology
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1540
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1546
  article-title: Short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: J BUON
– volume: 66
  start-page: 115
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 132
  article-title: Cancer statistics in China, 2015
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– volume: 26
  start-page: 250
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  end-page: 262
  article-title: Systematic review and pooled analysis assessing the association between elderly age and outcome following surgical resection of esophageal malignancy
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
– volume: 205
  start-page: 729
  issue: 6
  year: 2007
  end-page: 734
  article-title: Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
– volume: 43
  start-page: 345
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  end-page: 351
  article-title: Esophagectomy in patients 80 years of age and older with carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus
  publication-title: J Gastroenterol
– volume: 68
  start-page: 394
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  end-page: 424
  article-title: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– volume: 90
  start-page: 900
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 907
  article-title: Outcome of esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
– volume: 10
  start-page: 2481
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2489
  article-title: Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition)
  publication-title: J Thorac Dis
– volume: 10
  start-page: 448
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 457
  article-title: Esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a population-based study
  publication-title: J Thorac Dis
– volume: 28
  start-page: 3083
  issue: 25
  year: 2009
  end-page: 3107
  article-title: Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples
  publication-title: Stat Med
– volume: 98
  start-page: e14416
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  article-title: Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a STROBE compliant study
  publication-title: Medicine (Baltimore)
– volume: 71
  start-page: 414
  issue: 2
  year: 2001
  end-page: 418
  article-title: Esophageal resection in elderly esophageal carcinoma patients: improvement in postoperative complications
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
– volume: 175
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 1998
  end-page: 51
  article-title: A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus
  publication-title: Am J Surg
– volume: 36
  start-page: 6
  issue: 27
  year: 2018
  article-title: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): a phase III multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
– volume: 39
  start-page: 22
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  article-title: Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 global cancer statistics?
  publication-title: Cancer Commun (Lond)
– volume: 29
  start-page: 897
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  end-page: 905
  article-title: Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
– volume: 95
  start-page: 1741
  issue: 5
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1748
  article-title: Short and long-term outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1
  issue: 10
  year: 2019
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Outcomes of octogenarians with esophageal cancer: an analysis of the national cancer database
  publication-title: Dis Esophagus
– volume: 115
  start-page: 897
  issue: 6
  year: 1942
  end-page: 920
  article-title: Transthoracic resection of tumors of the stomach and esophagus
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 267
  start-page: 826
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  end-page: 832
  article-title: Extended right thoracic approach compared with limited left thoracic approach for patients with middle and lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: three-year survival of a prospective, randomized, open-label trial
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 133
  start-page: 1186
  issue: 5
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1192
  article-title: Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival
  publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
– volume: 112
  start-page: 517
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  end-page: 523
  article-title: Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus: a value-based comparison
  publication-title: J Surg Oncol
– ident: bibr11-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630403
– ident: bibr27-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483
– ident: bibr4-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2171-z
– ident: bibr13-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1002/sim.3697
– ident: bibr9-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02333-X
– ident: bibr14-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.89
– ident: bibr23-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00227-4
– ident: bibr25-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01353.x
– volume: 9
  start-page: 13007
  issue: 7
  year: 2016
  ident: bibr15-1073274820904700
  publication-title: Int J Clin Exp Med
– ident: bibr3-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21338
– ident: bibr1-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
– ident: bibr8-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.040
– ident: bibr5-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.084
– ident: bibr21-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-194206000-00004
– ident: bibr22-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.175
– ident: bibr24-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03332.x
– ident: bibr19-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3999-z
– ident: bibr2-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0368-6
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1540
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: bibr16-1073274820904700
  publication-title: J BUON
– ident: bibr26-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.039
– ident: bibr18-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2877
– ident: bibr12-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1111/dote.12533
– ident: bibr10-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1002/jso.24024
– ident: bibr6-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.307
– ident: bibr7-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1093/dote/doy128
– ident: bibr17-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014416
– ident: bibr20-1073274820904700
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280
SSID ssj0020434
Score 2.2725434
Snippet The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal...
The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
sage
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1073274820904700
SubjectTerms Esophageal cancer
Esophagus
Gastrointestinal surgery
Medical prognosis
Original Research Paper
Patients
Prognosis
Squamous cell carcinoma
Surgery
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQiFegoEFCSByiOrYTx721q60q0EKlpVJvke3YotI2W9jsoX-nv5SZJJvu8rxwtZ14ZH_2zNjjbxh7K41FN7mQuNKymKK-rlNbuiyNPEiL6j7LLb0dnn0qTs_Vh4v8YivVF8WE9fTA_cAd2GC4cHVJKZZULLWxKhfclqUljm3bMYGizts4U4OrxZVUd5eSuDVoie4XajvDlabXbFtKqOPq_52B-Wuc5FawV6d_Th6yB4PhCEe9wI_YvdA8ZreTMY0gLCN8XrcIoLCC4z76Cmb-Y0A3G2xTwxxLWphS2gL8vW-XVzdw2QAagDClVN2LGzjrSVZXgJbs2BI7nX9bWzoigElYLGBC6Yea5ZU9hCM4o8P8hgI7YE6MmOnMEg5q2LCdPGHnJ9Mvk9N0yLqQ-lyUbWrq3HgZFXdS13QvXzop6hhNkWcyRNzhuBei5sL7WjqNSOTBWqMtz5xVUsinbK9ZNuE5A-nyYAyipCijcrFwzlvNQ45KMSrvdcIONtNQ-YGSnDJjLKpsYCH_eeIS9n784rqn4_hL22Oa2bEdEWl3BQivaoBX9S94JWx_g4tqWN2rSigtsS905BP2ZqzGdUmXLbYJOCGVkDnaRpnUKMezHkajJJLYktFuSpjeAdiOqLs1zeXXjvtbE7YLk7B3BMU7kf40CC_-xyC8ZPcFHTN0J0_7bK_9vg6v0BZr3etu2f0AhPMt5w
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
  dbid: AFRWT
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELfG9sILAvEVGMhICImHMMd24pgX1FWdJlBhopvYW2Q79pjUprCmD_13-Eu5y9coA8RTJceNT_bvcmff-XeEvBTawDY5E6BpSYjBXpexyW0SB-aFAXOfpAbvDk8_Zsdn8v15er5Dqv4uTDeDqzeYVgUSNR9r1G48jT7ogozwqwRsp8B6aSYVY-_W9aJoT7v7ohrYguHp9QIj2w7zITdxf7vtFtnjKktBkfdGR5-_nA5bNCbbODS8P8YBrgObN8bcMmQN3_-fnNSbuZa_JIw1NuzoLrnTOZ901KLlHtnx1X3yYzyUIqTLQD-ta5gMv6KHbQYXnboPHrbq1FQlnUFLTSdY-gBe7-rlYkMvKwpOJJ1gue_5hp60RK0rCt7w0BMGnX1fGzxmoGM_n9MxljCqlgvzlo7oCQYEKkwOoTNk1YynBrFU0p4x5QE5O5qcjo_jrnJD7FKe17EuU-1EkMwKVWJsP7eClyFomHPhA3wlmeO8ZNy5UlgFaGbeGK0MS6yRgouHZLdaVv4xocKmXmtAWpYHaUNmrTOK-RQMa5DOqYgc9MtQuI7WHKtrzIukYzL_feEi8nr4x7eW0uMffQ9xZYd-SMbdNCyvLopOtwvjNeO2zLEKmAy50kamnJk8N0gDb2RE9ntcFD2-Cy6VgLESwSPyYngMuo0BG1N5WJCCixT8q0QokONRC6NBEoGMy-B7RURtAWxL1O0n1eXXhj9cIc4zHZFXCMVrkf42CU_-t-NTcpvjcURzQrVPduurtX8GPlttn3eK9hPuwDto
  priority: 102
  providerName: SAGE Publications
Title Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
URI https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1073274820904700
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048521
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2473732132
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2354151370
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7020469
https://doaj.org/article/ae902bd897314f879a4520a88a2145a4
Volume 27
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELdge-EFgfgqjMpICImHqI7txDEvqK1aTaCOat1E3yLHsWFSl2xr-rB_h7-UuyRNVz72VMlx0mvvzveZ3xHyXmgDYXIsQNNCH4C9zgOTZGHgmRMGzH0YGXx3eHYSH5_LL8to2Sbc1m1b5fZMrA_qvLSYIx9wqYQSHIKnz1fXAU6NwupqO0LjITlE6DJs6VLLXcDFZFNVBjEOIPpKdmXKAa7hEmeaSYXvt90xSzV6_79czr87J--0f9UWafqEPG5dSTpseP-UPHDFM_Jr3A0WpKWn3zYV_Dy3pqOmH4vO7FcHgTc1RU4XsFLRCQ4ygMfbqry8pRcFBZeQTnB49-qWzhvY1TUF37bbCV-6uN4YTBrQsVut6BgHEhXlpflEh3SO6f0CWz3oAjEyg5lBycjpFv_kOTmfTs7Gx0E7hyGwEU-qQOeRtsJLlgmVY6U-yQTPvddxFArn4cxjlvOccWtzkSmQTeaM0cqwMDNScPGCHBRl4V4RKrLIaQ1yEydeZj7OMmsUcxGYSS-tVT0y2LIhtS1IOc7KWKVhi0v-J-N65GN3x1UD0HHP3hFyttuH0Nr1QnnzI201NTVOM57lCc70kj5R2siIM5MkBkHdjeyRo61cpK2-r9OddPbIu-4yaCqWX0zhgCEpFxF4S6FQQMfLRow6SgTiJ4Mn1SNqT8D2SN2_Ulz8rNHAFcp5rHvkA4rijqT__Qmv76f_DXnEMaVQZ5mOyEF1s3Fvwe-qsn6tXH1yOJyefj-Dz9HkZH7ar7MYvwFKqSxw
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLam7gFeEIhbYYCRAImHqI7txAkSQmvp1NG1VHST9hYcx4FJXbKtqdD-Dj-A38g5uXXlsre9Ok5i-dx9jr9DyCsRagiTfQGS5qYO2OvE0UHsOimzQoO5dz2Nd4cnU390JD8de8db5FdzFwbLKhudWCrqJDd4Rt7jUgklOARPH87OHewahdnVpoVGxRZje_kDQrbl-_2PQN_XnO8NDwcjp-4q4BiPB4UTJl5oRCpZLFSCeecgFjxJ09D3XGFTkGBmOE8YNyYRsYKdZlbrUGnmxloKBDoAlb8tBYQyHbLdH05nX9oQj8kqjw2C40C8F6wToz0cwyHOQiYV3qi7YgjLfgH_cnL_rtW8UnBW2sC9u-RO7bzS3Yrb7pEtm90nPwdtK0Oap_TzqoANtUvaryrA6MSMLYT6VGcJncNIQYfYOgE-b4r89JKeZBScUDrEduGLSzqrgF6XFLzpdib8dH6-0nhMQQd2saADbIGU5af6Hd2lM0woZFhcQueIyulMNPJiQhvElQfk6EZo9JB0sjyzjwkVsWfDEDjVD1IZp34cG62Y9cAwp9IY1SW9hgyRqWHRsTvHInJrJPQ_Cdclb9s3zipIkGvm9pGy7TwE8y4H8otvUa0bIm1DxuMkwC5iMg1UqKXHmQ4CjTDyWnbJTsMXUa1hltFaHrrkZfsYdAMmfHRmgSARFx74Z65QsI5HFRu1KxGI2Ay-W5eoDQbbWOrmk-zke4k_rpDP_bBL3iArrpf0v014cv36X5Bbo8PJQXSwPx0_Jbc5HmiUZ1w7pFNcrOwz8PqK-HktapR8vWnp_g0Ph2bT
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1fb9MwELfQJiFeEIh_gQFGQkg8hDm2E8e8daXVYHRUdBN7i2zHhkldOtb0YV-HT8pdkmaUAeIpUnJJLrm73J3v8jtCXgptIE3OBFhaEmLw12VscpvEgXlhwN0nqcF_hyeH2f6x_HCSnnS9OfgvTPcGl2-wrQo4aj7WaN3nZdjtaoywVQKyKXBemknFIGPflhJc4xbZHow_fznqMy4m27Iy0Md4wlWd8to1NvxSA9__p5jzeuvkL_1fjUsa3yG3u1iSDlrh3yU3fHWP_Bj2kwXpItBPqxqezS_pXtuQRSfuwEPmTU1V0hnsqekIJxnA5V29OLukpxWFmJCOcHr3_JJOW9zVJYXgtqeEm86-rwyuGtChn8_pECcSVYsz85YO6BTX9yvs9aAzBMmMJwZVo6RrAJT75Hg8Ohrux90ghtilPK9jXabaiSCZFarEUn1uBS9D0FmaCB_go8cc5yXjzpXCKlBO5o3RyrDEGim4eEC2qkXlHxEqbOq1BsXJ8iBtyKx1RjGfgp8M0jkVkd21GArXoZTjsIx5kXTA5L8LLiKv-zPOW4SOf9DuoWR7OsTWbnYsLr4WnakWxmvGbZnjUC8ZcqWNTDkzeW4Q1d3IiOys9aJYq2vBpRJwL8jtI_KiPwymivUXU3kQSMFFCuFSIhTw8bBVo54TgQDKEEpFRG0o2Aarm0eq028NHLhCPc90RF6hKl6x9LeX8Ph_CZ-Tm9N34-Lj-8ODJ-QWx4WGZu1ph2zVFyv_FKKx2j7rbO4nAyop4Q
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Outcomes+Between+McKeown+and+Sweet+Esophagectomy+in+the+Elderly+Patients+for+Esophageal+Squamous+Cell+Carcinoma%3A+A+Propensity+Score-Matched+Analysis&rft.jtitle=Cancer+control&rft.au=Chen%2C+Dongni&rft.au=Hu%2C+Yihuai&rft.au=Chen%2C+Youfang&rft.au=Hu%2C+Jia&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.issn=1526-2359&rft.eissn=1526-2359&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1073274820904700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F1073274820904700&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1073-2748&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1073-2748&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1073-2748&client=summon