Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Predicts Responsiveness to Memory Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury

To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 97; no. 6; pp. 1026 - 1029.e1
Main Authors Sandry, Joshua, Chiou, Kathy S., DeLuca, John, Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-9993
1532-821X
1532-821X
DOI10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109

Cover

Abstract To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]). Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center. Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data. The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy. Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp2=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information. Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique. •Memory impairment is common after traumatic brain injury.•The success of cognitive rehabilitation is mixed.•Participants with high working memory capacity showed a greater benefit from rehabilitation.
AbstractList To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]). Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center. Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data. The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy. Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp2=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information. Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique. •Memory impairment is common after traumatic brain injury.•The success of cognitive rehabilitation is mixed.•Participants with high working memory capacity showed a greater benefit from rehabilitation.
Objective: To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Design: Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] 2 [WMC: high vs low]). Setting Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center. Participants: Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data. Interventions The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy. Main Outcome Measure Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Results: Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, eta sub(p) super(2)=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information. Conclusions: Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique.
Abstract Objective To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Design Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]). Setting Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center. Participants Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data. Interventions The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy. Main Outcome Measure Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Results Group and WMC interacted ( P =.008, η p 2 =.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information. Conclusions Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique.
To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation.OBJECTIVETo explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation.Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]).DESIGNPost hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]).Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center.SETTINGNonprofit medical rehabilitation research center.Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data.PARTICIPANTSParticipants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data.The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy.INTERVENTIONSThe treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy.Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURELong-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II.Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp(2)=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information.RESULTSGroup and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp(2)=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information.Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique.CONCLUSIONSIndividuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique.
To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]). Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center. Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data. The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy. Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp(2)=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information. Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique.
Author Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.
Sandry, Joshua
DeLuca, John
Chiou, Kathy S.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joshua
  surname: Sandry
  fullname: Sandry, Joshua
  email: SandryJ@Montclair.edu
  organization: Psychology Department, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kathy S.
  surname: Chiou
  fullname: Chiou, Kathy S.
  organization: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
– sequence: 3
  givenname: John
  surname: DeLuca
  fullname: DeLuca, John
  organization: Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nancy D.
  surname: Chiaravalloti
  fullname: Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.
  organization: Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26657213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkkuP0zAUhS00iOkU_gAL5CWbFj8SO0YIaSivSoNAwyDYWY5zA-4kdrCTSl3x10louxmJ6cry1fmOrXPuBTrzwQNCTylZUkLFi83SdG1cMkLz5b-ZeoBmNOdsUTD64wzNCCF8oZTi5-gipc14FTmnj9A5EyKXjPIZ-rP2ldu6ajANfuvqGiJ4Cwk7j7-HeOv8T_wJ2hB3eGU6Y12_w18iVM72CV9D6oJPbgseUsJ9OEqv4ZcpXeN607vg8WXdQ8Q30QztOLD4TTSj_dpvhrh7jB7Wpknw5HDO0bf3725WHxdXnz-sV5dXC5uzol8ISyTNZcF4DkxlZVnntibSFsAyWltmpWAsA1spzgQXtTAlkUSKsiw5q0HyOXq-9-1i-D1A6nXrkoWmMR7CkDRVWS5FJjg_LS0oVSRjXJyWSsW4pNOf5ujZQTqULVS6i641caePVYyCYi-wMaQUodb2EGA_5tVoSvTUut7oqXU9tb6fqRFld9Cj-73Qqz0EY-xbB1En66byKxfB9roK7n789R3cNs47a5pb2EHahCH6sVBNdWKa6K_TLk6rSHNCM6HIaPDy_wanXv8Lt-nu-A
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A6146
crossref_primary_10_1024_1016_264X_a000362
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_21428_4
crossref_primary_10_1024_1016_264X_a000298
crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acy029
crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_218028
crossref_primary_10_1080_02699052_2019_1686772
crossref_primary_10_1080_23279095_2018_1448818
Cites_doi 10.1177/1545968315604395
10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
10.1093/brain/awh107
10.1017/S1355617714000630
10.1007/s00415-014-7523-4
10.3758/s13421-011-0149-1
10.1017/S1355617714000678
10.2217/nmt.14.51
10.1080/13803395.2015.1078293
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
– notice: American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
– notice: Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7TS
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Physical Education Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Physical Education Index
DatabaseTitleList
Physical Education Index


MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Physical Therapy
EISSN 1532-821X
EndPage 1029.e1
ExternalDocumentID 26657213
10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109
S0003999315014690
1_s2_0_S0003999315014690
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
  grantid: H133A070037; H133A120030
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-~X
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
07C
0R~
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~5
23N
3O-
4.4
41~
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQOH
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABDQB
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ACBNA
ACGFO
ACGUR
ACRPL
ADBBV
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADRMJ
AEFWE
AENEX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGNAY
AGQPQ
AI.
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
BR6
C5W
CAG
COF
CS3
E3Z
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
K-O
KOM
KOO
L7B
M41
MO0
N4W
NEJ
NQ-
O-3
O9-
OH.
OHT
OK1
OT.
P2P
QTD
QZG
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SKT
SSZ
TWZ
UDS
UGJ
UHB
UHS
UPT
UQV
UV1
VH1
WH7
WHG
X7M
XH2
XOL
YQJ
YRY
YZZ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~S-
AFCTW
RIG
AAGJQ
AAIAV
ADPAM
AFDAS
AGZHU
AHPSJ
ALXNB
FRP
ZA5
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PKN
7X8
7TS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c071578235e294bbf5cf07c8e241fc2c76224ecd932636f6ab07076bbb32fe73
ISSN 0003-9993
1532-821X
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 19:44:04 EDT 2025
Sun Aug 24 04:14:13 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 11:59:29 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:40:13 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:50:51 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:51 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:29:19 EST 2024
Wed Mar 05 08:13:11 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:31:27 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Neurology
Memory Disorders
H-WMC
L-WMC
LTMPRΔ
Cognition
TBI
Rehabilitation
WMC
Brain injuries
mSMT
traumatic brain injury
modified Story Memory Technique
high working memory capacity individual
working memory capacity
long-term memory percent retained change scores
low working memory capacity individual
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c528t-6c071578235e294bbf5cf07c8e241fc2c76224ecd932636f6ab07076bbb32fe73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 26657213
PQID 1792371326
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1945764633
proquest_miscellaneous_1811904236
proquest_miscellaneous_1792371326
pubmed_primary_26657213
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0003999315014690
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
PublicationTitleAlternate Arch Phys Med Rehabil
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Sandry, DeLuca, Chiaravalloti (bib5) 2015; 262
Cowan, Beschin, Della Sala (bib8) 2004; 127
Chiaravalloti, Sandry, Moore, DeLuca (bib1) 2015 Sep 10
Chiou, Sandry, Chiaravalloti (bib4) 2015; 37
Schelble, Therriault, Miller (bib9) 2012; 40
Constantinidou, Zaganas, Papastefanakis, Kasselimis, Nidos, Simos (bib7) 2014; 20
Sandry, Sumowski (bib6) 2014; 20
Barrett, Tugade, Engle (bib2) 2004; 130
Sandry (bib3) 2015; 5
Sandry (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib5) 2015; 262
Chiaravalloti (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib1) 2015
Constantinidou (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib7) 2014; 20
Sandry (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib6) 2014; 20
Barrett (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib2) 2004; 130
Sandry (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib3) 2015; 5
Chiou (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib4) 2015; 37
Cowan (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib8) 2004; 127
Wechsler (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib11) 1997
Schelble (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib9) 2012; 40
Delis (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib10) 2000
References_xml – volume: 37
  start-page: 1074
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1085
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Cognitive contributions to differences in learning after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
  publication-title: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol
– volume: 20
  start-page: 868
  year: 2014
  end-page: 872
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Working memory mediates the relationship between intellectual enrichment and long-term memory in multiple sclerosis: an exploratory analysis of cognitive reserve
  publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 4
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Working memory and memory loss in neurodegenerative disease
  publication-title: Neurodegener Dis Manag
– volume: 127
  start-page: 825
  year: 2004
  end-page: 834
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Verbal recall in amnesiacs under conditions of diminished retroactive interference
  publication-title: Brain
– volume: 262
  start-page: 59
  year: 2015
  end-page: 64
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Working memory capacity links cognitive reserve with long-term memory in moderate to severe TBI: a translational approach
  publication-title: J Neurol
– volume: 130
  start-page: 553
  year: 2004
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind
  publication-title: Psychol Bull
– volume: 40
  start-page: 218
  year: 2012
  end-page: 230
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory
  publication-title: Mem Cognit
– year: 2015 Sep 10
  ident: bib1
  article-title: An RCT to treat learning impairment in traumatic brain injury: the TBI-MEM trial
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
– volume: 20
  start-page: 822
  year: 2014
  end-page: 835
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Age-related decline in verbal learning is moderated by demographic factors, working memory capacity, and presence of amnestic mild cognitive impairment
  publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib1
  article-title: An RCT to treat learning impairment in traumatic brain injury: the TBI-MEM trial
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968315604395
– volume: 130
  start-page: 553
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib2
  article-title: Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind
  publication-title: Psychol Bull
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
– volume: 127
  start-page: 825
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib8
  article-title: Verbal recall in amnesiacs under conditions of diminished retroactive interference
  publication-title: Brain
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awh107
– year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib10
– volume: 20
  start-page: 868
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib6
  article-title: Working memory mediates the relationship between intellectual enrichment and long-term memory in multiple sclerosis: an exploratory analysis of cognitive reserve
  publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc
  doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000630
– year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib11
– volume: 262
  start-page: 59
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib5
  article-title: Working memory capacity links cognitive reserve with long-term memory in moderate to severe TBI: a translational approach
  publication-title: J Neurol
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7523-4
– volume: 40
  start-page: 218
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib9
  article-title: Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory
  publication-title: Mem Cognit
  doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0149-1
– volume: 20
  start-page: 822
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib7
  article-title: Age-related decline in verbal learning is moderated by demographic factors, working memory capacity, and presence of amnestic mild cognitive impairment
  publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc
  doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000678
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib3
  article-title: Working memory and memory loss in neurodegenerative disease
  publication-title: Neurodegener Dis Manag
  doi: 10.2217/nmt.14.51
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1074
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib4
  article-title: Cognitive contributions to differences in learning after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
  publication-title: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol
  doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1078293
SSID ssj0006531
Score 2.254817
Snippet To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a...
Abstract Objective To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can...
Objective: To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1026
SubjectTerms Brain injuries
Brain Injuries, Traumatic - rehabilitation
Cognition
Humans
Memory
Memory Disorders
Memory Disorders - rehabilitation
Memory, Long-Term
Mental Recall
Neurology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Centers
Trauma Severity Indices
Title Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Predicts Responsiveness to Memory Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0003999315014690
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0003999315014690
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26657213
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1792371326
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1811904236
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1945764633
Volume 97
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELbKroS48FhgKS8ZiVuVKLYTJzkWFrTsUoRKV-zNSlxH2wraattw4MKv438xju0krdrCconaxHYSz5eZsf3NGKHXRS5jlSjiySSmXshl4CWSZ14eBlnKSUaisZ7QH3zipxfh2WV02en8brGWylXuy59b40r-R6pwDuSqo2RvINm6UTgBv0G-cAQJw_GfZPyhiaY6sRudGIKVmwPvDTSRFr56MInSRgOOJ5q_MbTcWKvrwAO1RYdrqbt7_WoPcbBopcnt-kZvKQFaZVqux1K3M9gunOzdwr0hsa81XM_swCWzkn82X16VDW_oajIvHd0D9Jtfe9zqYymzTRYxFM-usx-aRWD4CZXV6J347VkNwhv2Va2pmQfOK2trasPktYhsq13wknjLhMPf1Fdkq4UwkxVTP1t81-lgSeSbnFqNPXQcgA0zWZMXHS9uKnQbQrchzFL-LXRI41izBQ7758Ov57VLwCNWb92oX8pGbxmi4eaT7PKQdo2AKk9odB_dtUMY3Dd4fIA6anaEbg-srI_Qvc9W_nhkUlY8RL8apOIWUvFkhi1SsYEfdkjFDql4Hal4NXdF15GKK6TiGqm4Qio2SH2ELt6_G7099ezWH56MaLLyQGfERO-0wCJF0zDPi0gWQSwTBR5nIakEG05DJcd6-MF4wbNc563ieZ4zWqiYPUYHs_lMPUE4CDOWEkah8hi85SgPZVFkY5XCSJ3yLOgi4rpbSPvIenuWb2K3oLuoV9dZmKwwe0szJ0Xh4p3BQguA5N5a8bZaamkV0FIQsaQiEF-qAHtAFdEcAZ7CG0V1TetHG__4r3d85SAmwMjolcNspuYl3ElnGY2hE_meMgmBwQWMzvaVScMo5iFnrIuODYbr_qN6DZgS9vRGffsM3WnUx3N0sLou1QsYJqzyl_Yj_AMMEBel
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual+Differences+in+Working+Memory+Capacity+Predicts+Responsiveness+to+Memory+Rehabilitation+After+Traumatic+Brain+Injury&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+physical+medicine+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Sandry%2C+Joshua&rft.au=Chiou%2C+Kathy+S.&rft.au=DeLuca%2C+John&rft.au=Chiaravalloti%2C+Nancy+D.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1026&rft.epage=1029.e1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.apmr.2015.10.109&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-9993&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-9993&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-9993&client=summon