Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Predicts Responsiveness to Memory Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury
To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial...
Saved in:
Published in | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 97; no. 6; pp. 1026 - 1029.e1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.06.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0003-9993 1532-821X 1532-821X |
DOI | 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109 |
Cover
Abstract | To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation.
Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]).
Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center.
Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data.
The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy.
Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II.
Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp2=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information.
Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique.
•Memory impairment is common after traumatic brain injury.•The success of cognitive rehabilitation is mixed.•Participants with high working memory capacity showed a greater benefit from rehabilitation. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation.
Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]).
Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center.
Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data.
The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy.
Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II.
Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp2=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information.
Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique.
•Memory impairment is common after traumatic brain injury.•The success of cognitive rehabilitation is mixed.•Participants with high working memory capacity showed a greater benefit from rehabilitation. Objective: To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Design: Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] 2 [WMC: high vs low]). Setting Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center. Participants: Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data. Interventions The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy. Main Outcome Measure Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Results: Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, eta sub(p) super(2)=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information. Conclusions: Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique. Abstract Objective To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Design Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]). Setting Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center. Participants Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data. Interventions The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy. Main Outcome Measure Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Results Group and WMC interacted ( P =.008, η p 2 =.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information. Conclusions Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique. To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation.OBJECTIVETo explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation.Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]).DESIGNPost hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]).Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center.SETTINGNonprofit medical rehabilitation research center.Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data.PARTICIPANTSParticipants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data.The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy.INTERVENTIONSThe treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy.Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURELong-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II.Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp(2)=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information.RESULTSGroup and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp(2)=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information.Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique.CONCLUSIONSIndividuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique. To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a cognitive marker to identify who will and will not improve from memory rehabilitation. Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to treat learning and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI): 2 × 2 between-subjects quasiexperimental design (2 [group: treatment vs control] × 2 [WMC: high vs low]). Nonprofit medical rehabilitation research center. Participants (N=65) with moderate to severe TBI with pre- and posttreatment data. The treatment group completed 10 cognitive rehabilitation sessions in which subjects were taught a memory strategy focusing on learning to use context and imagery to remember information. The placebo control group engaged in active therapy sessions that did not involve learning the memory strategy. Long-term memory percent retention change scores for an unorganized list of words from the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Group and WMC interacted (P=.008, ηp(2)=.12). High WMC participants showed a benefit from treatment compared with low WMC participants. Individual differences in WMC accounted for 45% of the variance in whether participants with TBI in the treatment group benefited from applying the compensatory treatment strategy to learn unorganized information. Individuals with higher WMC showed a significantly greater rehabilitation benefit when applying the compensatory strategy to learn unorganized information. WMC is a useful cognitive marker for identifying participants with TBI who respond to memory rehabilitation with the modified Story Memory Technique. |
Author | Chiaravalloti, Nancy D. Sandry, Joshua DeLuca, John Chiou, Kathy S. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joshua surname: Sandry fullname: Sandry, Joshua email: SandryJ@Montclair.edu organization: Psychology Department, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ – sequence: 2 givenname: Kathy S. surname: Chiou fullname: Chiou, Kathy S. organization: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ – sequence: 3 givenname: John surname: DeLuca fullname: DeLuca, John organization: Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ – sequence: 4 givenname: Nancy D. surname: Chiaravalloti fullname: Chiaravalloti, Nancy D. organization: Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26657213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkkuP0zAUhS00iOkU_gAL5CWbFj8SO0YIaSivSoNAwyDYWY5zA-4kdrCTSl3x10louxmJ6cry1fmOrXPuBTrzwQNCTylZUkLFi83SdG1cMkLz5b-ZeoBmNOdsUTD64wzNCCF8oZTi5-gipc14FTmnj9A5EyKXjPIZ-rP2ldu6ajANfuvqGiJ4Cwk7j7-HeOv8T_wJ2hB3eGU6Y12_w18iVM72CV9D6oJPbgseUsJ9OEqv4ZcpXeN607vg8WXdQ8Q30QztOLD4TTSj_dpvhrh7jB7Wpknw5HDO0bf3725WHxdXnz-sV5dXC5uzol8ISyTNZcF4DkxlZVnntibSFsAyWltmpWAsA1spzgQXtTAlkUSKsiw5q0HyOXq-9-1i-D1A6nXrkoWmMR7CkDRVWS5FJjg_LS0oVSRjXJyWSsW4pNOf5ujZQTqULVS6i641caePVYyCYi-wMaQUodb2EGA_5tVoSvTUut7oqXU9tb6fqRFld9Cj-73Qqz0EY-xbB1En66byKxfB9roK7n789R3cNs47a5pb2EHahCH6sVBNdWKa6K_TLk6rSHNCM6HIaPDy_wanXv8Lt-nu-A |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3174_ajnr_A6146 crossref_primary_10_1024_1016_264X_a000362 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_21428_4 crossref_primary_10_1024_1016_264X_a000298 crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acy029 crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_218028 crossref_primary_10_1080_02699052_2019_1686772 crossref_primary_10_1080_23279095_2018_1448818 |
Cites_doi | 10.1177/1545968315604395 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553 10.1093/brain/awh107 10.1017/S1355617714000630 10.1007/s00415-014-7523-4 10.3758/s13421-011-0149-1 10.1017/S1355617714000678 10.2217/nmt.14.51 10.1080/13803395.2015.1078293 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine – notice: American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine – notice: Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7TS |
DOI | 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index |
DatabaseTitleList | Physical Education Index MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Physical Therapy |
EISSN | 1532-821X |
EndPage | 1029.e1 |
ExternalDocumentID | 26657213 10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109 S0003999315014690 1_s2_0_S0003999315014690 |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research grantid: H133A070037; H133A120030 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K -~X .1- .55 .FO .GJ 07C 0R~ 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~5 23N 3O- 4.4 41~ 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQOH AAQQT AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO AAYWO ABDQB ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABWVN ACBNA ACGFO ACGUR ACRPL ADBBV ADMUD ADNMO ADRMJ AEFWE AENEX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AGNAY AGQPQ AI. AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY BR6 C5W CAG COF CS3 E3Z EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W J5H K-O KOM KOO L7B M41 MO0 N4W NEJ NQ- O-3 O9- OH. OHT OK1 OT. P2P QTD QZG R2- ROL RPZ SEL SES SJN SKT SSZ TWZ UDS UGJ UHB UHS UPT UQV UV1 VH1 WH7 WHG X7M XH2 XOL YQJ YRY YZZ Z5R ZGI ZXP ~S- AFCTW RIG AAGJQ AAIAV ADPAM AFDAS AGZHU AHPSJ ALXNB FRP ZA5 AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN 7X8 7TS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c071578235e294bbf5cf07c8e241fc2c76224ecd932636f6ab07076bbb32fe73 |
ISSN | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 19:44:04 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 24 04:14:13 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 11:59:29 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:40:13 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:50:51 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:51 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:29:19 EST 2024 Wed Mar 05 08:13:11 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:31:27 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | Neurology Memory Disorders H-WMC L-WMC LTMPRΔ Cognition TBI Rehabilitation WMC Brain injuries mSMT traumatic brain injury modified Story Memory Technique high working memory capacity individual working memory capacity long-term memory percent retained change scores low working memory capacity individual |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c528t-6c071578235e294bbf5cf07c8e241fc2c76224ecd932636f6ab07076bbb32fe73 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 26657213 |
PQID | 1792371326 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1945764633 proquest_miscellaneous_1811904236 proquest_miscellaneous_1792371326 pubmed_primary_26657213 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0003999315014690 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2016 text: 2016-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Arch Phys Med Rehabil |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Sandry, DeLuca, Chiaravalloti (bib5) 2015; 262 Cowan, Beschin, Della Sala (bib8) 2004; 127 Chiaravalloti, Sandry, Moore, DeLuca (bib1) 2015 Sep 10 Chiou, Sandry, Chiaravalloti (bib4) 2015; 37 Schelble, Therriault, Miller (bib9) 2012; 40 Constantinidou, Zaganas, Papastefanakis, Kasselimis, Nidos, Simos (bib7) 2014; 20 Sandry, Sumowski (bib6) 2014; 20 Barrett, Tugade, Engle (bib2) 2004; 130 Sandry (bib3) 2015; 5 Sandry (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib5) 2015; 262 Chiaravalloti (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib1) 2015 Constantinidou (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib7) 2014; 20 Sandry (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib6) 2014; 20 Barrett (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib2) 2004; 130 Sandry (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib3) 2015; 5 Chiou (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib4) 2015; 37 Cowan (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib8) 2004; 127 Wechsler (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib11) 1997 Schelble (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib9) 2012; 40 Delis (10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib10) 2000 |
References_xml | – volume: 37 start-page: 1074 year: 2015 end-page: 1085 ident: bib4 article-title: Cognitive contributions to differences in learning after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury publication-title: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol – volume: 20 start-page: 868 year: 2014 end-page: 872 ident: bib6 article-title: Working memory mediates the relationship between intellectual enrichment and long-term memory in multiple sclerosis: an exploratory analysis of cognitive reserve publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc – volume: 5 start-page: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 4 ident: bib3 article-title: Working memory and memory loss in neurodegenerative disease publication-title: Neurodegener Dis Manag – volume: 127 start-page: 825 year: 2004 end-page: 834 ident: bib8 article-title: Verbal recall in amnesiacs under conditions of diminished retroactive interference publication-title: Brain – volume: 262 start-page: 59 year: 2015 end-page: 64 ident: bib5 article-title: Working memory capacity links cognitive reserve with long-term memory in moderate to severe TBI: a translational approach publication-title: J Neurol – volume: 130 start-page: 553 year: 2004 ident: bib2 article-title: Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind publication-title: Psychol Bull – volume: 40 start-page: 218 year: 2012 end-page: 230 ident: bib9 article-title: Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory publication-title: Mem Cognit – year: 2015 Sep 10 ident: bib1 article-title: An RCT to treat learning impairment in traumatic brain injury: the TBI-MEM trial publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair – volume: 20 start-page: 822 year: 2014 end-page: 835 ident: bib7 article-title: Age-related decline in verbal learning is moderated by demographic factors, working memory capacity, and presence of amnestic mild cognitive impairment publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib1 article-title: An RCT to treat learning impairment in traumatic brain injury: the TBI-MEM trial publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968315604395 – volume: 130 start-page: 553 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib2 article-title: Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind publication-title: Psychol Bull doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553 – volume: 127 start-page: 825 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib8 article-title: Verbal recall in amnesiacs under conditions of diminished retroactive interference publication-title: Brain doi: 10.1093/brain/awh107 – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib10 – volume: 20 start-page: 868 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib6 article-title: Working memory mediates the relationship between intellectual enrichment and long-term memory in multiple sclerosis: an exploratory analysis of cognitive reserve publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000630 – year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib11 – volume: 262 start-page: 59 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib5 article-title: Working memory capacity links cognitive reserve with long-term memory in moderate to severe TBI: a translational approach publication-title: J Neurol doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7523-4 – volume: 40 start-page: 218 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib9 article-title: Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory publication-title: Mem Cognit doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0149-1 – volume: 20 start-page: 822 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib7 article-title: Age-related decline in verbal learning is moderated by demographic factors, working memory capacity, and presence of amnestic mild cognitive impairment publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000678 – volume: 5 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib3 article-title: Working memory and memory loss in neurodegenerative disease publication-title: Neurodegener Dis Manag doi: 10.2217/nmt.14.51 – volume: 37 start-page: 1074 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109_bib4 article-title: Cognitive contributions to differences in learning after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury publication-title: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1078293 |
SSID | ssj0006531 |
Score | 2.254817 |
Snippet | To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used as a... Abstract Objective To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can... Objective: To explore how individual differences affect rehabilitation outcomes by specifically investigating whether working memory capacity (WMC) can be used... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1026 |
SubjectTerms | Brain injuries Brain Injuries, Traumatic - rehabilitation Cognition Humans Memory Memory Disorders Memory Disorders - rehabilitation Memory, Long-Term Mental Recall Neurology Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Centers Trauma Severity Indices |
Title | Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Predicts Responsiveness to Memory Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0003999315014690 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0003999315014690 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.109 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26657213 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1792371326 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1811904236 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1945764633 |
Volume | 97 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELbKroS48FhgKS8ZiVuVKLYTJzkWFrTsUoRKV-zNSlxH2wraattw4MKv438xju0krdrCconaxHYSz5eZsf3NGKHXRS5jlSjiySSmXshl4CWSZ14eBlnKSUaisZ7QH3zipxfh2WV02en8brGWylXuy59b40r-R6pwDuSqo2RvINm6UTgBv0G-cAQJw_GfZPyhiaY6sRudGIKVmwPvDTSRFr56MInSRgOOJ5q_MbTcWKvrwAO1RYdrqbt7_WoPcbBopcnt-kZvKQFaZVqux1K3M9gunOzdwr0hsa81XM_swCWzkn82X16VDW_oajIvHd0D9Jtfe9zqYymzTRYxFM-usx-aRWD4CZXV6J347VkNwhv2Va2pmQfOK2trasPktYhsq13wknjLhMPf1Fdkq4UwkxVTP1t81-lgSeSbnFqNPXQcgA0zWZMXHS9uKnQbQrchzFL-LXRI41izBQ7758Ov57VLwCNWb92oX8pGbxmi4eaT7PKQdo2AKk9odB_dtUMY3Dd4fIA6anaEbg-srI_Qvc9W_nhkUlY8RL8apOIWUvFkhi1SsYEfdkjFDql4Hal4NXdF15GKK6TiGqm4Qio2SH2ELt6_G7099ezWH56MaLLyQGfERO-0wCJF0zDPi0gWQSwTBR5nIakEG05DJcd6-MF4wbNc563ieZ4zWqiYPUYHs_lMPUE4CDOWEkah8hi85SgPZVFkY5XCSJ3yLOgi4rpbSPvIenuWb2K3oLuoV9dZmKwwe0szJ0Xh4p3BQguA5N5a8bZaamkV0FIQsaQiEF-qAHtAFdEcAZ7CG0V1TetHG__4r3d85SAmwMjolcNspuYl3ElnGY2hE_meMgmBwQWMzvaVScMo5iFnrIuODYbr_qN6DZgS9vRGffsM3WnUx3N0sLou1QsYJqzyl_Yj_AMMEBel |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual+Differences+in+Working+Memory+Capacity+Predicts+Responsiveness+to+Memory+Rehabilitation+After+Traumatic+Brain+Injury&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+physical+medicine+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Sandry%2C+Joshua&rft.au=Chiou%2C+Kathy+S.&rft.au=DeLuca%2C+John&rft.au=Chiaravalloti%2C+Nancy+D.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1026&rft.epage=1029.e1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.apmr.2015.10.109&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_apmr_2015_10_109 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-9993&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-9993&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-9993&client=summon |