Stimulating the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Decreases the Asset Bubble: A tDCS Study

Many studies have discussed the neural basis of asset bubbles. They found that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) played an important role in bubble formation, but whether a causal relationship exists and the mechanism of the effect of the DLPFC on bubbles remains unsettled. Using transcrani...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 10; p. 1031
Main Authors Jin, Xuejun, Chen, Cheng, Zhou, Xue, Yang, Xiaolan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 09.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many studies have discussed the neural basis of asset bubbles. They found that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) played an important role in bubble formation, but whether a causal relationship exists and the mechanism of the effect of the DLPFC on bubbles remains unsettled. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we modulated the activity of the DLPFC and investigated the causal relationship between the DLPFC and the asset bubble in the classical learning-to-forecast experiment. 126 subjects were randomly divided into three groups and received different stimulations (left anodal/right cathodal, right anodal/left cathodal, or sham stimulation), respectively. We also conducted a 2-back task before and after stimulation to measure changes in subjects' cognitive abilities and explore in detail the cognitive mechanism of the effect of DLPFC stimulation on asset bubbles. Based on our results, we found that the bubble of the left anodal/right cathodal stimulation group was significantly smaller than that of the sham stimulation group. In the meantime, subjects performed significantly better in the 2-back task after left anodal/right cathodal stimulation but not right anodal/left cathodal or sham stimulation, which is consistent with their performance in the learning-to-forecast experiment, supporting the cognitive mechanism to some extent. Furthermore, we examined different forecasting rules across individuals and discovered that the left anodal/right cathodal stimulation group preferred the adaptive learning rule, while the sham and right anodal/left cathodal stimulation groups adopted a pure trend-following rule that tended to intensify market volatility aggressively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Bernd Weber, University of Bonn, Germany
This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Yi Hu, East China Normal University, China; Delin Sun, Duke University, United States
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01031