Radiographic study of delayed tooth development in patients with dental agenesis
The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected control group and to determine the effects of confounding factors including the severity of the dental agenesis, age, sex, ethnicity, and the n...
Saved in:
| Published in | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics Vol. 141; no. 3; pp. 307 - 314 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.03.2012
Elsevier |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected control group and to determine the effects of confounding factors including the severity of the dental agenesis, age, sex, ethnicity, and the number of stages used to estimate dental age.
A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study of dental panoramic tomographs was undertaken between July 2007 and April 2008 in a postgraduate teaching school. A total of 139 patients (aged 9-18 years) were recruited from the orthodontic clinic on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to either a dental agenesis group or a control group. Dental panoramic tomograms were assessed, and the stages of development of the permanent teeth in the left maxillary and left mandibular regions were scored by using the 12 stages of Haavikko and the 8 stages of Demirjian and Goldstein. For each tooth scored, the mean dental age and standard error were determined by using the dental age assessment method, and an estimated dental age for each subject was derived by using the weighted average method.
A statistically significant delay in dental age was found in the patients with dental agenesis compared with the control group. The dental age assessment method of Haavikko showed a delay of 1.20 years (SD, 1.74), and the method of Demirjian and Goldstein showed a delay of 1.64 years (SD, 1.75). It was also observed that older patients with dental agenesis had greater delays in tooth formation (P <0.001). With the Haavikko method, for every year of chronologic age, the delay in dental age increased by 0.53 year; with the Demirjian and Goldstein method, the delay increased by 0.48 year. A significant association was seen between the severity of dental agenesis and the delay in dental age (P <0.01). With both methods, for each additional developmentally absent tooth, the dental age was delayed by 0.13 year (lower confidence interval, −0.22; upper confidence interval, 0.35). There was no evidence that sex or ethnicity has an effect on the delay in dental age in patients with dental agenesis.
The development of permanent teeth in children with dental agenesis is delayed when compared with a matched control group. The severity of dental agenesis affected the magnitude of the delay (P <0.01). This delay has implications in orthodontic treatment planning and in the estimation of age for legal, immigration, archaeological, and forensic purposes. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected control group and to determine the effects of confounding factors including the severity of the dental agenesis, age, sex, ethnicity, and the number of stages used to estimate dental age.
A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study of dental panoramic tomographs was undertaken between July 2007 and April 2008 in a postgraduate teaching school. A total of 139 patients (aged 9-18 years) were recruited from the orthodontic clinic on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to either a dental agenesis group or a control group. Dental panoramic tomograms were assessed, and the stages of development of the permanent teeth in the left maxillary and left mandibular regions were scored by using the 12 stages of Haavikko and the 8 stages of Demirjian and Goldstein. For each tooth scored, the mean dental age and standard error were determined by using the dental age assessment method, and an estimated dental age for each subject was derived by using the weighted average method.
A statistically significant delay in dental age was found in the patients with dental agenesis compared with the control group. The dental age assessment method of Haavikko showed a delay of 1.20 years (SD, 1.74), and the method of Demirjian and Goldstein showed a delay of 1.64 years (SD, 1.75). It was also observed that older patients with dental agenesis had greater delays in tooth formation (P <0.001). With the Haavikko method, for every year of chronologic age, the delay in dental age increased by 0.53 year; with the Demirjian and Goldstein method, the delay increased by 0.48 year. A significant association was seen between the severity of dental agenesis and the delay in dental age (P <0.01). With both methods, for each additional developmentally absent tooth, the dental age was delayed by 0.13 year (lower confidence interval, −0.22; upper confidence interval, 0.35). There was no evidence that sex or ethnicity has an effect on the delay in dental age in patients with dental agenesis.
The development of permanent teeth in children with dental agenesis is delayed when compared with a matched control group. The severity of dental agenesis affected the magnitude of the delay (P <0.01). This delay has implications in orthodontic treatment planning and in the estimation of age for legal, immigration, archaeological, and forensic purposes. Introduction The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected control group and to determine the effects of confounding factors including the severity of the dental agenesis, age, sex, ethnicity, and the number of stages used to estimate dental age. Methods A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study of dental panoramic tomographs was undertaken between July 2007 and April 2008 in a postgraduate teaching school. A total of 139 patients (aged 9-18 years) were recruited from the orthodontic clinic on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to either a dental agenesis group or a control group. Dental panoramic tomograms were assessed, and the stages of development of the permanent teeth in the left maxillary and left mandibular regions were scored by using the 12 stages of Haavikko and the 8 stages of Demirjian and Goldstein. For each tooth scored, the mean dental age and standard error were determined by using the dental age assessment method, and an estimated dental age for each subject was derived by using the weighted average method. Results A statistically significant delay in dental age was found in the patients with dental agenesis compared with the control group. The dental age assessment method of Haavikko showed a delay of 1.20 years (SD, 1.74), and the method of Demirjian and Goldstein showed a delay of 1.64 years (SD, 1.75). It was also observed that older patients with dental agenesis had greater delays in tooth formation ( P <0.001). With the Haavikko method, for every year of chronologic age, the delay in dental age increased by 0.53 year; with the Demirjian and Goldstein method, the delay increased by 0.48 year. A significant association was seen between the severity of dental agenesis and the delay in dental age ( P <0.01). With both methods, for each additional developmentally absent tooth, the dental age was delayed by 0.13 year (lower confidence interval, −0.22; upper confidence interval, 0.35). There was no evidence that sex or ethnicity has an effect on the delay in dental age in patients with dental agenesis. Conclusions The development of permanent teeth in children with dental agenesis is delayed when compared with a matched control group. The severity of dental agenesis affected the magnitude of the delay ( P <0.01). This delay has implications in orthodontic treatment planning and in the estimation of age for legal, immigration, archaeological, and forensic purposes. The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected control group and to determine the effects of confounding factors including the severity of the dental agenesis, age, sex, ethnicity, and the number of stages used to estimate dental age.INTRODUCTIONThe aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected control group and to determine the effects of confounding factors including the severity of the dental agenesis, age, sex, ethnicity, and the number of stages used to estimate dental age.A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study of dental panoramic tomographs was undertaken between July 2007 and April 2008 in a postgraduate teaching school. A total of 139 patients (aged 9-18 years) were recruited from the orthodontic clinic on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to either a dental agenesis group or a control group. Dental panoramic tomograms were assessed, and the stages of development of the permanent teeth in the left maxillary and left mandibular regions were scored by using the 12 stages of Haavikko and the 8 stages of Demirjian and Goldstein. For each tooth scored, the mean dental age and standard error were determined by using the dental age assessment method, and an estimated dental age for each subject was derived by using the weighted average method.METHODSA single-center retrospective cross-sectional study of dental panoramic tomographs was undertaken between July 2007 and April 2008 in a postgraduate teaching school. A total of 139 patients (aged 9-18 years) were recruited from the orthodontic clinic on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to either a dental agenesis group or a control group. Dental panoramic tomograms were assessed, and the stages of development of the permanent teeth in the left maxillary and left mandibular regions were scored by using the 12 stages of Haavikko and the 8 stages of Demirjian and Goldstein. For each tooth scored, the mean dental age and standard error were determined by using the dental age assessment method, and an estimated dental age for each subject was derived by using the weighted average method.A statistically significant delay in dental age was found in the patients with dental agenesis compared with the control group. The dental age assessment method of Haavikko showed a delay of 1.20 years (SD, 1.74), and the method of Demirjian and Goldstein showed a delay of 1.64 years (SD, 1.75). It was also observed that older patients with dental agenesis had greater delays in tooth formation (P <0.001). With the Haavikko method, for every year of chronologic age, the delay in dental age increased by 0.53 year; with the Demirjian and Goldstein method, the delay increased by 0.48 year. A significant association was seen between the severity of dental agenesis and the delay in dental age (P <0.01). With both methods, for each additional developmentally absent tooth, the dental age was delayed by 0.13 year (lower confidence interval, -0.22; upper confidence interval, 0.35). There was no evidence that sex or ethnicity has an effect on the delay in dental age in patients with dental agenesis.RESULTSA statistically significant delay in dental age was found in the patients with dental agenesis compared with the control group. The dental age assessment method of Haavikko showed a delay of 1.20 years (SD, 1.74), and the method of Demirjian and Goldstein showed a delay of 1.64 years (SD, 1.75). It was also observed that older patients with dental agenesis had greater delays in tooth formation (P <0.001). With the Haavikko method, for every year of chronologic age, the delay in dental age increased by 0.53 year; with the Demirjian and Goldstein method, the delay increased by 0.48 year. A significant association was seen between the severity of dental agenesis and the delay in dental age (P <0.01). With both methods, for each additional developmentally absent tooth, the dental age was delayed by 0.13 year (lower confidence interval, -0.22; upper confidence interval, 0.35). There was no evidence that sex or ethnicity has an effect on the delay in dental age in patients with dental agenesis.The development of permanent teeth in children with dental agenesis is delayed when compared with a matched control group. The severity of dental agenesis affected the magnitude of the delay (P <0.01). This delay has implications in orthodontic treatment planning and in the estimation of age for legal, immigration, archaeological, and forensic purposes.CONCLUSIONSThe development of permanent teeth in children with dental agenesis is delayed when compared with a matched control group. The severity of dental agenesis affected the magnitude of the delay (P <0.01). This delay has implications in orthodontic treatment planning and in the estimation of age for legal, immigration, archaeological, and forensic purposes. Introduction: The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected control group and to determine the effects of confounding factors including the severity of the dental agenesis, age, sex, ethnicity, and the number of stages used to estimate dental age. Methods: A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study of dental panoramic tomographs was undertaken between July 2007 and April 2008 in a postgraduate teaching school. A total of 139 patients (aged 9-18 years) were recruited from the orthodontic clinic on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to either a dental agenesis group or a control group. Dental panoramic tomograms were assessed, and the stages of development of the permanent teeth in the left maxillary and left mandibular regions were scored by using the 12 stages of Haavikko and the 8 stages of Demirjian and Goldstein. For each tooth scored, the mean dental age and standard error were determined by using the dental age assessment method, and an estimated dental age for each subject was derived by using the weighted average method. Results: A statistically significant delay in dental age was found in the patients with dental agenesis compared with the control group. The dental age assessment method of Haavikko showed a delay of 1.20 years (SD, 1.74), and the method of Demirjian and Goldstein showed a delay of 1.64 years (SD, 1.75). It was also observed that older patients with dental agenesis had greater delays in tooth formation (P <0.001). With the Haavikko method, for every year of chronologic age, the delay in dental age increased by 0.53 year; with the Demirjian and Goldstein method, the delay increased by 0.48 year. A significant association was seen between the severity of dental agenesis and the delay in dental age (P <0.01). With both methods, for each additional developmentally absent tooth, the dental age was delayed by 0.13 year (lower confidence interval, -0.22; upper confidence interval, 0.35). There was no evidence that sex or ethnicity has an effect on the delay in dental age in patients with dental agenesis. Conclusions: The development of permanent teeth in children with dental agenesis is delayed when compared with a matched control group. The severity of dental agenesis affected the magnitude of the delay (P <0.01). This delay has implications in orthodontic treatment planning and in the estimation of age for legal, immigration, archaeological, and forensic purposes. The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected control group and to determine the effects of confounding factors including the severity of the dental agenesis, age, sex, ethnicity, and the number of stages used to estimate dental age. A single-center retrospective cross-sectional study of dental panoramic tomographs was undertaken between July 2007 and April 2008 in a postgraduate teaching school. A total of 139 patients (aged 9-18 years) were recruited from the orthodontic clinic on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to either a dental agenesis group or a control group. Dental panoramic tomograms were assessed, and the stages of development of the permanent teeth in the left maxillary and left mandibular regions were scored by using the 12 stages of Haavikko and the 8 stages of Demirjian and Goldstein. For each tooth scored, the mean dental age and standard error were determined by using the dental age assessment method, and an estimated dental age for each subject was derived by using the weighted average method. A statistically significant delay in dental age was found in the patients with dental agenesis compared with the control group. The dental age assessment method of Haavikko showed a delay of 1.20 years (SD, 1.74), and the method of Demirjian and Goldstein showed a delay of 1.64 years (SD, 1.75). It was also observed that older patients with dental agenesis had greater delays in tooth formation (P <0.001). With the Haavikko method, for every year of chronologic age, the delay in dental age increased by 0.53 year; with the Demirjian and Goldstein method, the delay increased by 0.48 year. A significant association was seen between the severity of dental agenesis and the delay in dental age (P <0.01). With both methods, for each additional developmentally absent tooth, the dental age was delayed by 0.13 year (lower confidence interval, -0.22; upper confidence interval, 0.35). There was no evidence that sex or ethnicity has an effect on the delay in dental age in patients with dental agenesis. The development of permanent teeth in children with dental agenesis is delayed when compared with a matched control group. The severity of dental agenesis affected the magnitude of the delay (P <0.01). This delay has implications in orthodontic treatment planning and in the estimation of age for legal, immigration, archaeological, and forensic purposes. |
| Author | Jones, Steven P. Moles, David R. Gill, Daljit S. Parekh, Susan Ruiz-Mealin, Erika V. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Erika V. surname: Ruiz-Mealin fullname: Ruiz-Mealin, Erika V. organization: Honorary specialist registrar in orthodontics, University College London Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 2 givenname: Susan surname: Parekh fullname: Parekh, Susan organization: Clinical lecturer in paediatric dentistry, University College London Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 3 givenname: Steven P. surname: Jones fullname: Jones, Steven P. organization: Consultant and honorary senior lecturer in orthodontics, University College London Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 4 givenname: David R. surname: Moles fullname: Moles, David R. organization: Director, Postgraduate Education and Research, Peninsula Dental School, Plymouth, United Kingdom; professor, Oral Health Services Research, Peninsula Dental School, Plymouth, United Kingdom – sequence: 5 givenname: Daljit S. surname: Gill fullname: Gill, Daljit S. email: daljit.gill@nhs.net organization: Consultant and honorary senior lecturer in orthodontics, University College London Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, London, United Kingdom |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25654718$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22381491$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFkl1rFDEYhYNU7Lb6CwSZG7E3s77JZjIZREGKX1BQ_LgO2eSdNutsMk2yLfvvzXRXhYLuVRLynJPknJyQIx88EvKUwpwCFS9Xc70KNswZUDoHOQcmHpAZha6tRduwIzIDKbu64SCOyUlKKwDoOINH5JixhaS8ozPy5au2LlxGPV45U6W8sdsq9JXFQW_RVjmEfFVWNziEcY0-V85Xo86uTFN16-42fdZDpS_RY3LpMXnY6yHhk_14Sn68f_f9_GN98fnDp_O3F7VpmMw1t8A7DgjCGLMQTKAudzKm7SwCMtTCSLmUXDJrsW9ta02HtuuYWC57C3pxSl7sfMcYrjeYslq7ZHAYtMewSaqQtGkYk4U8-y9ZElvwFhif0Gd7dLNco1VjdGsdt-p3XgV4vgd0Mnroo_bGpb9cIxre0sloseNMDClF7P8gFNTUnlqpu_bU1J4CqUp7RdXdUxmXS9jB56jdcED7eqfFEvqNw6iSKS0ZtC6iycoGd0D_5p7eDM678sifuMW0CpvoS5-KqsQUqG_T35q-Fi2O0Da8GLz6t8HB438BXH3fgA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_020_03573_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_oral5010014 crossref_primary_10_5933_JKAPD_2018_45_4_484 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_016_1450_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_015_1622_1 crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_8683970 crossref_primary_10_21307_aoj_2020_082 crossref_primary_10_1179_1465313313Y_0000000070 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_022_02522_6 crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2020_275 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2020_05_023 crossref_primary_10_1080_00450618_2022_2043435 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2024_108927 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_02711_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_archoralbio_2019_104629 crossref_primary_10_1080_00016357_2023_2232859 crossref_primary_10_1597_13_071 crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2013_875587 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_archoralbio_2016_10_024 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_023_6317_4 crossref_primary_10_2319_030513_183_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04786_6 crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bdj_2015_52 crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0000000000007516 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_023_03128_5 crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_9378325 crossref_primary_10_5933_JKAPD_2018_45_4_514 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2015_12_031 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_024_03278_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2018_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1177_1465312518820328 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40510_018_0226_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2023_05_029 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_019_02066_5 crossref_primary_10_1590_1807_2577_09119 crossref_primary_10_52428_20756208_v11i27_524 crossref_primary_10_1038_ejhg_2016_117 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1038/bdj.2007.732 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.019 10.12968/denu.2008.35.2.79 10.1177/154405910808700715 10.1080/03014467600001671 10.1038/bdj.2008.21 10.1177/00220345680470043101 10.1038/192989a0 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.06.004 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2012 American Association of Orthodontists American Association of Orthodontists 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2012 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 American Association of Orthodontists – notice: American Association of Orthodontists – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2012 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Dentistry |
| EISSN | 1097-6752 |
| EndPage | 314 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 22381491 25654718 10_1016_j_ajodo_2011_08_026 S0889540611010754 1_s2_0_S0889540611010754 |
| Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 23M 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAGKA AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV C45 CAG COF CS3 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HDX HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LH1 M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OB- OM. OVD OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TEORI UHS UV1 WUQ X7M Z5R ZGI ZXP ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-4d04940e06ccc3626ea238cc79de0e2ea6c88b8482ddef7d7dc9ed9926bbfd0a3 |
| IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
| ISSN | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 16:50:25 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 05:23:53 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:33:45 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:14:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:35:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:57:15 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:16:43 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:34 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:43:10 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Human Radiography Agenesis Orthodontic procedures Radiodiagnosis Malformation Teeth Exploration Tooth Dentistry |
| Language | English |
| License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2012 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c528t-4d04940e06ccc3626ea238cc79de0e2ea6c88b8482ddef7d7dc9ed9926bbfd0a3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 22381491 |
| PQID | 1093470248 |
| PQPubID | 23462 |
| PageCount | 8 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_926155228 proquest_miscellaneous_1093470248 pubmed_primary_22381491 pascalfrancis_primary_25654718 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2011_08_026 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ajodo_2011_08_026 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajodo_2011_08_026 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0889540611010754 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajodo_2011_08_026 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-03-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2012 text: 2012-03-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | New York, NY |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, NY – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier |
| References | Rune, Sarnäs (bib8) 1974; 44 Demirjian, Goldstein (bib11) 1976; 3 Garn, Lewis, Bonne (bib7) 1961; 192 Haavikko (bib9) 1970; 66 Matalova, Fleischmannova, Sharpe, Tucker (bib4) 2008; 87 Nohl, Cole, Hobson, Jepson, Meechan, Wright (bib5) 2008; 35 Dhanrajani (bib2) 2002; 33 Cobourne (bib3) 2007; 203 Maber, Liversidge, Hector (bib15) 2006; 159 Bailit, Thomson, Niswander (bib6) 1968; 47 Lozada, Infante (bib12) 2001; 2 Uslenghi, Liversidge, Wong (bib13) 2006; 51 Odagami, Kida, Inoue, Kurosu (bib10) 1995; 33 Goodman, Jones, Hobkirk, King (bib1) 1994; 21 Roberts, Parekh, Petrie, Lucas (bib14) 2008; 204 Haavikko (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib9) 1970; 66 Odagami (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib10) 1995; 33 Garn (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib7) 1961; 192 Goodman (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib1) 1994; 21 Bailit (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib6) 1968; 47 Rune (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib8) 1974; 44 Maber (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib15) 2006; 159 Demirjian (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib11) 1976; 3 Matalova (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib4) 2008; 87 Nohl (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib5) 2008; 35 Lozada (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib12) 2001; 2 Uslenghi (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib13) 2006; 51 Roberts (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib14) 2008; 204 Dhanrajani (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib2) 2002; 33 Cobourne (10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib3) 2007; 203 |
| References_xml | – volume: 204 start-page: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 4 ident: bib14 article-title: Dental age assessment (DAA): a simple method for children and emerging adults publication-title: Br Dent J – volume: 203 start-page: 203 year: 2007 end-page: 208 ident: bib3 article-title: Familial human hypodontia—is it all in the genes? publication-title: Br Dent J – volume: 66 start-page: 103 year: 1970 end-page: 170 ident: bib9 article-title: The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth: an orthopantomographic study publication-title: Suom Hammaslaak Toim – volume: 192 start-page: 989 year: 1961 ident: bib7 article-title: Third molar polymorphism and the timing of tooth formation publication-title: Nature – volume: 2 start-page: 24 year: 2001 end-page: 29 ident: bib12 article-title: Estudio de la maduración dental y edad dental en individuos con ausencia congénita de dientes permanentes comparados con individuos sin ausencia congenital dental publication-title: Int J Dent Anthropol – volume: 21 start-page: 381 year: 1994 end-page: 384 ident: bib1 article-title: Hypodontia: clinical features and the management of mild to moderate hypodontia publication-title: Dent Update – volume: 35 start-page: 79 year: 2008 end-page: 88 ident: bib5 article-title: The management of hypodontia: present and future publication-title: Dent Update – volume: 33 start-page: 91 year: 1995 end-page: 98 ident: bib10 article-title: Dental age of children with congenitally missing permanent teeth publication-title: Jpn J Pedod – volume: 159 start-page: S68 year: 2006 end-page: S73 ident: bib15 article-title: Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth publication-title: Forensic Sci Int – volume: 51 start-page: 129 year: 2006 end-page: 133 ident: bib13 article-title: A radiographic study of tooth development in hypodontia publication-title: Arch Oral Biol – volume: 3 start-page: 411 year: 1976 end-page: 421 ident: bib11 article-title: New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth publication-title: Ann Hum Biol – volume: 33 start-page: 294 year: 2002 end-page: 302 ident: bib2 article-title: Hypodontia: etiology, clinical features, and management publication-title: Quintessence Int – volume: 87 start-page: 617 year: 2008 end-page: 623 ident: bib4 article-title: Tooth agenesis: from molecular genetics to molecular dentistry publication-title: J Dent Res – volume: 44 start-page: 316 year: 1974 end-page: 321 ident: bib8 article-title: Tooth size and tooth formation in children with advanced hypodontia publication-title: Angle Orthod – volume: 47 start-page: 669 year: 1968 ident: bib6 article-title: Dental eruption and hypodontia publication-title: J Dent Res – volume: 21 start-page: 381 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib1 article-title: Hypodontia: clinical features and the management of mild to moderate hypodontia publication-title: Dent Update – volume: 203 start-page: 203 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib3 article-title: Familial human hypodontia—is it all in the genes? publication-title: Br Dent J doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.732 – volume: 159 start-page: S68 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib15 article-title: Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth publication-title: Forensic Sci Int doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.019 – volume: 35 start-page: 79 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib5 article-title: The management of hypodontia: present and future publication-title: Dent Update doi: 10.12968/denu.2008.35.2.79 – volume: 66 start-page: 103 year: 1970 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib9 article-title: The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth: an orthopantomographic study publication-title: Suom Hammaslaak Toim – volume: 44 start-page: 316 year: 1974 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib8 article-title: Tooth size and tooth formation in children with advanced hypodontia publication-title: Angle Orthod – volume: 87 start-page: 617 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib4 article-title: Tooth agenesis: from molecular genetics to molecular dentistry publication-title: J Dent Res doi: 10.1177/154405910808700715 – volume: 33 start-page: 294 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib2 article-title: Hypodontia: etiology, clinical features, and management publication-title: Quintessence Int – volume: 2 start-page: 24 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib12 article-title: Estudio de la maduración dental y edad dental en individuos con ausencia congénita de dientes permanentes comparados con individuos sin ausencia congenital dental publication-title: Int J Dent Anthropol – volume: 3 start-page: 411 year: 1976 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib11 article-title: New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth publication-title: Ann Hum Biol doi: 10.1080/03014467600001671 – volume: 204 start-page: 1 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib14 article-title: Dental age assessment (DAA): a simple method for children and emerging adults publication-title: Br Dent J doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.21 – volume: 47 start-page: 669 year: 1968 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib6 article-title: Dental eruption and hypodontia publication-title: J Dent Res doi: 10.1177/00220345680470043101 – volume: 33 start-page: 91 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib10 article-title: Dental age of children with congenitally missing permanent teeth publication-title: Jpn J Pedod – volume: 192 start-page: 989 year: 1961 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib7 article-title: Third molar polymorphism and the timing of tooth formation publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/192989a0 – volume: 51 start-page: 129 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026_bib13 article-title: A radiographic study of tooth development in hypodontia publication-title: Arch Oral Biol doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.06.004 |
| SSID | ssj0009420 |
| Score | 2.2038908 |
| Snippet | The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an unaffected... Introduction The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an... Introduction: The aims of this study were to compare the radiographic development of permanent teeth in a group of children affected by dental agenesis with an... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 307 |
| SubjectTerms | Adolescent Age Age determination Age Determination by Teeth - methods Age Factors Anodontia - classification Anodontia - diagnostic imaging Anodontia - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Child Children Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) Cross-Sectional Studies Dentistry Developmental stages Ethnic Groups Female Follow-Up Studies Forensic science Humans Immigration Male Mandible Mandible - diagnostic imaging Maxilla Maxilla - diagnostic imaging Medical sciences Odontogenesis - physiology Orthodontics Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Radiography, Panoramic Retrospective Studies Sex Sex Factors Statistical analysis Teeth Tomography, X-Ray Tooth Germ - diagnostic imaging Tooth Germ - growth & development |
| Title | Radiographic study of delayed tooth development in patients with dental agenesis |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0889540611010754 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0889540611010754 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.026 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22381491 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1093470248 https://www.proquest.com/docview/926155228 |
| Volume | 141 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS-RAEC7EPbggy_pYN-46tODR2Ul6Op3kKO7K6KCID9Zb069AZMkMm_Hgxd9uVR4ziC_wFBKq6aS6uqq68_VXAHsm8rhsMGE_kkSq7ZzsZzKOcZXiNBFjO-5oH_L0TI6uxclNfLMEh91ZGIJVtr6_8em1t26fDFptDqZFMbgkgE5M8QitCgMfcYIKkZCV_3pYwDwy0VAzEpqHpDvmoRrjpW9x7bfg8SSGhZej0-pUV6izvCl28Xo2Wkelo6_wpU0n2UHzxmuw5Mt1WPlNECCq4rYB5xfaFQ0tdWFZTSbLJjkjbsh779hsgiPF3AI5xIqStVyrFaNNWubqA5MM_Q56xaLahOujP1eHo35bRaFvY57OUP9EARP6UFpriXzGawzT1iaZ86HnXkubpiYVKUdPlycucTbzLsu4NCZ3oR5-g-VyUvrvwMwwSfPIDGOLSaP0qc5TL63hNs8F51YHwDvtKdtSjFOli3-qw5LdqlrlilSuqP4llwHszxtNG4aNt8VFNyyqOzyK7k5hBHi7WfJSM1-1U7ZSkaq4CtUzswpAzls-scz3u-w9sZr512GWGVNOEMBuZ0YKJzX9qdGln9xVBAsYioTo5gJgr8jgABF9HkeRrcYEFx1QHiayaPujr_4DPuMdb7B2P2F59v_O72DyNTO9enb14NPB8Xh0Rtfxxd_xI9EpMHI |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3dT9swEMBPUB5AQoiNrzDGPGmPVE3cxEkeERsqA6ppA4k3y1-RUqG0IuWB_567xGmFBkzaa-pTkvP57pyefwfwTUcOtw067EeCoNrWin4ukgR3KVYRGNtyS98hr8didBv_vEvuVuCsOwtDZZXe97c-vfHW_srAa3MwK8vBHyrQSSgeoVVh4ItXYY3oVEkP1k4vLkfjJXs3bumMVNBDAh18qCnzUhPc_i1RngRZeD1Abc5UjWor2n4XbyekTWA634Ytn1Gy0_ahP8CKqz7C-neqAqJGbjvw67eyZUumLg1reLJsWjDCQz45y-ZTnCxml8VDrKyYx63WjL7TMtucmWToetAxlvUu3J7_uDkb9X0jhb5JeDbHKSAKTOhCYYwh_oxTGKmNSXPrQsedEibLdBZnHJ1dkdrUmtzZPOdC68KGargHvWpauQNgephmRaSHicG8UbhMFZkTRnNTFDHnRgXAO-1J4ynj1OziXnblZBPZqFySyiW1wOQigJOF0KyFbLw_PO6mRXbnR9HjSQwC74ulr4m52q_aWkay5jKUf1lWAGIh-cI4_33L4xdWs3g7TDQTSgsC-NqZkcR1TX_WqMpNH2uqDBjGKRHnAmBvjMEJIoIexyH7rQkub0CpWJxHh__76F9gfXRzfSWvLsaXn2ADf-Ft6d0R9OYPj-4z5mJzfezX2jOYOTGA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic+study+of+delayed+tooth+development+in+patients+with+dental+agenesis&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+orthodontics+and+dentofacial+orthopedics&rft.au=Ruiz-Mealin%2C+Erika+V.&rft.au=Parekh%2C+Susan&rft.au=Jones%2C+Steven+P.&rft.au=Moles%2C+David+R.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=314&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajodo.2011.08.026&rft.externalDocID=S0889540611010754 |
| thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F08895406%2FS0889540611X00215%2Fcov150h.gif |