Data on farmers’ perception and acceptance of sustainability standards

The presented data informs about a comprehensive online survey on the perception and acceptance of farm sustainability standards amongst German farmers. We conducted the online interviews, with a total of 598 adequately answered questionnaires in summer 2017. The resulting sample is representative o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inData in brief Vol. 32; p. 106250
Main Author Hannus, Veronika
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.10.2020
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The presented data informs about a comprehensive online survey on the perception and acceptance of farm sustainability standards amongst German farmers. We conducted the online interviews, with a total of 598 adequately answered questionnaires in summer 2017. The resulting sample is representative of German farmers, as the distribution of participants corresponds very well to the percentage distribution of farms in Germany. The survey contained a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a structured survey of 30 sub-aspects of rewards to be expected from the application of a sustainability standard and a risk elicitation lottery choice-task. Besides, the personal characteristics of the farmers (e.g. gender, education, communication behaviour, age) and farm characteristics (e.g. farm type, size, labour, profit) were recorded. Since the complete raw dataset cannot be published due to the privacy rights of human subjects and the stated data use agreement (DUA) with the participants, the present article demonstrates the data collection process, describes the parameter of the DCE and, present summary statistics of the sample. In addition, we illustrate the variables coding and data structure using a model data set with 10 generated entries. Further, a reduced and edited exercise dataset, which is structured analogous to the real dataset, is used to demonstrate the analysis of the DCE data step-by-step. The results and the interpretation of the actual DCE data analysis are published in the article 'Acceptance of sustainability standards among farmers' - empirical evidence from Germany' [1]. The survey data can provide further insights on farmers' expected rewards from participating in a sustainability standard, on the role of risk perception and tolerance of German farmers, and the role of communication behaviour in the innovation adoption context.
AbstractList The presented data informs about a comprehensive online survey on the perception and acceptance of farm sustainability standards amongst German farmers. We conducted the online interviews, with a total of 598 adequately answered questionnaires in summer 2017. The resulting sample is representative of German farmers, as the distribution of participants corresponds very well to the percentage distribution of farms in Germany. The survey contained a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a structured survey of 30 sub-aspects of rewards to be expected from the application of a sustainability standard and a risk elicitation lottery choice-task. Besides, the personal characteristics of the farmers (e.g. gender, education, communication behaviour, age) and farm characteristics (e.g. farm type, size, labour, profit) were recorded. Since the complete raw dataset cannot be published due to the privacy rights of human subjects and the stated data use agreement (DUA) with the participants, the present article demonstrates the data collection process, describes the parameter of the DCE and, present summary statistics of the sample. In addition, we illustrate the variables coding and data structure using a model data set with 10 generated entries. Further, a reduced and edited exercise dataset, which is structured analogous to the real dataset, is used to demonstrate the analysis of the DCE data step-by-step. The results and the interpretation of the actual DCE data analysis are published in the article 'Acceptance of sustainability standards among farmers' - empirical evidence from Germany' [1]. The survey data can provide further insights on farmers' expected rewards from participating in a sustainability standard, on the role of risk perception and tolerance of German farmers, and the role of communication behaviour in the innovation adoption context.
The presented data informs about a comprehensive online survey on the perception and acceptance of farm sustainability standards amongst German farmers. We conducted the online interviews, with a total of 598 adequately answered questionnaires in summer 2017. The resulting sample is representative of German farmers, as the distribution of participants corresponds very well to the percentage distribution of farms in Germany. The survey contained a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a structured survey of 30 sub-aspects of rewards to be expected from the application of a sustainability standard and a risk elicitation lottery choice-task. Besides, the personal characteristics of the farmers (e.g. gender, education, communication behaviour, age) and farm characteristics (e.g. farm type, size, labour, profit) were recorded. Since the complete raw dataset cannot be published due to the privacy rights of human subjects and the stated data use agreement (DUA) with the participants, the present article demonstrates the data collection process, describes the parameter of the DCE and, present summary statistics of the sample. In addition, we illustrate the variables coding and data structure using a model data set with 10 generated entries. Further, a reduced and edited exercise dataset, which is structured analogous to the real dataset, is used to demonstrate the analysis of the DCE data step-by-step. The results and the interpretation of the actual DCE data analysis are published in the article 'Acceptance of sustainability standards among farmers' - empirical evidence from Germany' [1]. The survey data can provide further insights on farmers' expected rewards from participating in a sustainability standard, on the role of risk perception and tolerance of German farmers, and the role of communication behaviour in the innovation adoption context.The presented data informs about a comprehensive online survey on the perception and acceptance of farm sustainability standards amongst German farmers. We conducted the online interviews, with a total of 598 adequately answered questionnaires in summer 2017. The resulting sample is representative of German farmers, as the distribution of participants corresponds very well to the percentage distribution of farms in Germany. The survey contained a discrete choice experiment (DCE), a structured survey of 30 sub-aspects of rewards to be expected from the application of a sustainability standard and a risk elicitation lottery choice-task. Besides, the personal characteristics of the farmers (e.g. gender, education, communication behaviour, age) and farm characteristics (e.g. farm type, size, labour, profit) were recorded. Since the complete raw dataset cannot be published due to the privacy rights of human subjects and the stated data use agreement (DUA) with the participants, the present article demonstrates the data collection process, describes the parameter of the DCE and, present summary statistics of the sample. In addition, we illustrate the variables coding and data structure using a model data set with 10 generated entries. Further, a reduced and edited exercise dataset, which is structured analogous to the real dataset, is used to demonstrate the analysis of the DCE data step-by-step. The results and the interpretation of the actual DCE data analysis are published in the article 'Acceptance of sustainability standards among farmers' - empirical evidence from Germany' [1]. The survey data can provide further insights on farmers' expected rewards from participating in a sustainability standard, on the role of risk perception and tolerance of German farmers, and the role of communication behaviour in the innovation adoption context.
ArticleNumber 106250
Author Hannus, Veronika
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Veronika
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7384-3928
  surname: Hannus
  fullname: Hannus, Veronika
  email: veronika.hannus@tum.de
  organization: Technical University of Munich, Germany, TUM School of Management & TUM School of Life Sciences, Agricultural Production and Resource Economics, Alte Akademie 14, 85354 Freising, Germany
BookMark eNqFUstuHCEQRJGt2HH8AbnNMZfdAAMzoEiRIudhS5Z8sc-oB3ocVrOwAdaSb_6N_F6-JEzGkeIcnBNUU1XqpusVOQgxICFvGF0zyrp3m7Xzw5pTPuOOS_qCHPNW8lUrqD74635ETnPeUEqZFLUoX5KjlmslhFTH5PwTFGhiaEZIW0z558OPZofJ4q74WoXgGrAzgmCxiWOT97mADzD4yZf7poLgILn8mhyOMGU8fTxPyM2Xz9dn56vLq68XZx8vV1byvqyGdkBNRz4o5GLoucZeIudjq7SUyjqphO5sO_agHaKE2r9AoKBw4EiVa0_IxeLrImzMLvktpHsTwZvfhZhuDaTi7YSG0tZJDUoo1gp0anDWsd4JhdoqCli9Pixeu_2wRWcxlATTE9OnL8F_M7fxzvRCCyH6avD20SDF73vMxWx9tjhNEDDus-FdR3UvOib_TxWi05pRriu1X6g2xZwTjsb6AvM-ahN-MoyaOQFmY2oCzJwAsySgKtk_yj-zPKd5v2iwbu3OYzLZeqzbdj6hLfVb_TPqX5fzymE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy13041002
crossref_primary_10_3390_su131910788
Cites_doi 10.1177/1536867X1301300312
10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.002
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110617
10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.004
10.1177/002224379603300305
10.1177/1536867X0700700306
10.1093/ajae/aar036
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Author
2020 The Author.
2020 The Author 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Author
– notice: 2020 The Author.
– notice: 2020 The Author 2020
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

AGRICOLA

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sciences (General)
Education
EISSN 2352-3409
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_003d59a848134ed8bdcd17d48e9c80ae
PMC7494447
10_1016_j_dib_2020_106250
S2352340920311446
GeographicLocations Germany
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Germany
GroupedDBID 0R~
0SF
4.4
457
53G
5VS
6I.
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAIKJ
AALRI
AAXUO
ABMAC
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADRAZ
AEXQZ
AFTJW
AGHFR
AITUG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
DIK
EBS
EJD
FDB
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
IPNFZ
KQ8
M41
M48
M~E
NCXOZ
O9-
OK1
RIG
ROL
RPM
SSZ
AAFWJ
AAYWO
AAYXX
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADVLN
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPKN
AFPUW
AIGII
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
APXCP
CITATION
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-b3be90f2b8e24b729e75e22f389558cd58496c3f7a9dee5a4094ea0a8eb2e08d3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2352-3409
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:16:09 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:24:46 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 07:43:31 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:25:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:58:53 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:54 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 25 21:02:40 EDT 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Expected reward
Farm sustainability standard
Risk elicitation
Standard design
Innovation adoption
Willingness-to-accept
Choice experiment
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c527t-b3be90f2b8e24b729e75e22f389558cd58496c3f7a9dee5a4094ea0a8eb2e08d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-7384-3928
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250
PMID 32984458
PQID 2446991029
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_003d59a848134ed8bdcd17d48e9c80ae
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7494447
proquest_miscellaneous_2660974615
proquest_miscellaneous_2446991029
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_dib_2020_106250
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dib_2020_106250
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_dib_2020_106250
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Data in brief
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References (bib0010) 2012
Hannus, Venus, Sauer (bib0001) 2020; 267
Hannus (bib0005) 2017
Huber, Zwerina (bib0006) 1996; 33
Penn, Hu (bib0012) 2016
Rose, Louviere, Bliemer (bib0008) 2013
Tonsor, Shupp (bib0011) 2011; 93
Bliemer, Rose (bib0009) 2010; 44
Pacifico, Yoo (bib0015) 2013; 13
Hess, Daly (bib0003) 2014
Hensher, Rose, Greene (bib0004) 2015
Greiner, Bliemer, Ballweg (bib0007) 2014; 10
Kanning (bib0013) 2013
(bib0002) 2016
Hole (bib0014) 2007; 7
(10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0010) 2012
Hannus (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0001) 2020; 267
Hensher (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0004) 2015
Huber (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0006) 1996; 33
Hess (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0003) 2014
Kanning (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0013) 2013
Hannus (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0005) 2017
Greiner (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0007) 2014; 10
Pacifico (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0015) 2013; 13
Bliemer (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0009) 2010; 44
(10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0002) 2016
Rose (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0008) 2013
Hole (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0014) 2007; 7
Tonsor (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0011) 2011; 93
Penn (10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0012) 2016
References_xml – year: 2015
  ident: bib0004
  article-title: Applied Choice analysis. A Primer
– year: 2016
  ident: bib0012
  article-title: Making the most of a cheap talk in an online survey
  publication-title: Paper prep. for the Agricultural and Appl. Econ. Ass. Annual Meeting
– year: 2016
  ident: bib0002
  publication-title: Agrarstrukturerhebung 2016 - Betriebswirtschaftliche Ausrichtung und Standardoutput - Fachserie 3 Reihe 2.1.4
– volume: 93
  start-page: 1015
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1031
  ident: bib0011
  article-title: Cheap talk scripts and online choice experiments: ‘Looking Beyond the Mean’
  publication-title: Am. J. Agric. Econ.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 34
  year: 2014
  end-page: 45
  ident: bib0007
  article-title: Design considerations of a choice experiment to estimate likely participation by north Australian pastoralists in contractual biodiversity conservation
  publication-title: J. Choice Model.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 307
  year: 1996
  end-page: 317
  ident: bib0006
  article-title: Importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs
  publication-title: J. Market. Res.
– start-page: 21
  year: 2013
  end-page: 43
  ident: bib0013
  article-title: Sustainable development – the social challenge for the 21st century (Original: Nachhaltige Entwicklung - Die gesellschaftliche Herausforderung für das 21. Jahrhundert)
  publication-title: Corporate Sustainability Management (Original: Betriebliches Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement)
– volume: 13
  start-page: 625
  year: 2013
  end-page: 639
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: lclogit: a Stata command for fitting latent-class conditional logit models via the expectation-maximization algorithm
  publication-title: Stata J.
– year: 2012
  ident: bib0010
  publication-title: Ngene 1.1.1 User Manual & Reference Guide, version of 16
– volume: 267
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0001
  article-title: Acceptance of sustainability standards by farmers – empirical evidence from Germany
  publication-title: J. Environ. Manag.
– volume: 44
  start-page: 720
  year: 2010
  end-page: 734
  ident: bib0009
  article-title: Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations
  publication-title: Transp. Res. Part B
– year: 2014
  ident: bib0003
  article-title: Handbook of Choice Modelling
– volume: 7
  start-page: 388
  year: 2007
  end-page: 401
  ident: bib0014
  article-title: Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood
  publication-title: Stata J.
– year: 2017
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Optimal design of agricultural sustainability standards: insights from a Delphi study in Germany
  publication-title: Proceedings in System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks 2017, 161st EAAE Seminar, Igls, 13-17 February
– year: 2013
  ident: bib0008
  article-title: Efficient stated choice design allowing for variable choice-set sizes
  publication-title: Int. Choice Modelling Conf. Sydney, AU, 3–5 July
– volume: 13
  start-page: 625
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0015
  article-title: lclogit: a Stata command for fitting latent-class conditional logit models via the expectation-maximization algorithm
  publication-title: Stata J.
  doi: 10.1177/1536867X1301300312
– volume: 10
  start-page: 34
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0007
  article-title: Design considerations of a choice experiment to estimate likely participation by north Australian pastoralists in contractual biodiversity conservation
  publication-title: J. Choice Model.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.002
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0010
– volume: 267
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0001
  article-title: Acceptance of sustainability standards by farmers – empirical evidence from Germany
  publication-title: J. Environ. Manag.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110617
– volume: 44
  start-page: 720
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0009
  article-title: Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations
  publication-title: Transp. Res. Part B
  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.004
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0005
  article-title: Optimal design of agricultural sustainability standards: insights from a Delphi study in Germany
– year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0012
  article-title: Making the most of a cheap talk in an online survey
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0004
– start-page: 21
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0013
  article-title: Sustainable development – the social challenge for the 21st century (Original: Nachhaltige Entwicklung - Die gesellschaftliche Herausforderung für das 21. Jahrhundert)
– volume: 33
  start-page: 307
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0006
  article-title: Importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs
  publication-title: J. Market. Res.
  doi: 10.1177/002224379603300305
– year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0002
– year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0008
  article-title: Efficient stated choice design allowing for variable choice-set sizes
– volume: 7
  start-page: 388
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0014
  article-title: Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood
  publication-title: Stata J.
  doi: 10.1177/1536867X0700700306
– volume: 93
  start-page: 1015
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0011
  article-title: Cheap talk scripts and online choice experiments: ‘Looking Beyond the Mean’
  publication-title: Am. J. Agric. Econ.
  doi: 10.1093/ajae/aar036
– year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250_bib0003
SSID ssj0001542355
Score 2.1489277
Snippet The presented data informs about a comprehensive online survey on the perception and acceptance of farm sustainability standards amongst German farmers. We...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 106250
SubjectTerms Choice experiment
Data
data collection
education
exercise
Expected reward
Farm sustainability standard
farms
gender
Germany
humans
Innovation adoption
labor
Risk elicitation
risk perception
Standard design
summer
surveys
Willingness-to-accept
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELaqnrhUFKhYoMhIHGilSF4_YvvIq1ohwamVerP8mKhboWzV3R648Tf4e_ySzuSx2lyWC6fEsfPwzDjzjT2eYex9llGA1bHyiNwqWjqrorK-cg3gebY5G9rg_P1HvbjS367N9U6qL_IJ68MD94SjZGPF-EhR35WG4lLJZW6LduCzExHo74s6b8eY6vcHI0zoUp7iQVYKrZhxSbNz7irLhLahpDIaAGKilLrY_RPdtIM9p56TO6ro4ik7GjAk_9h_-zE7gPYZOx5G6Zp_GEJJnz1niy9xE_mq5U28pwnqv7__8LutKwuPbeExU4l4z1cNX4_7qchl9hcfJxrWL9jVxdfLz4tqyJ1QZSPtpkoqgReNTA6kTsgHsAakbBCfGONyQdzh66waG30BMJHMPIgiOrS0QbiiTthhu2rhJeOqEapxWD83oKPSaT5PJilXW1m7WOsZEyPxQh4Ci1N-i59h9CC7DUjvQPQOPb1n7Hx7y10fVWNf40_EkW1DCojdXUAxCYOYhH-JyYzpkZ9hwBY9ZsBHLfe9-93I-4DjjhZTYgurh3VAWFQjthbS72lT1wLtNQSNM2YngjPpzLSmXd50Ub6t9lpr--p_9P41e0Kd6p0Q37DDzf0DnCKY2qS33bh5BA8iHEs
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Data on farmers’ perception and acceptance of sustainability standards
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106250
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2446991029
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2660974615
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7494447
https://doaj.org/article/003d59a848134ed8bdcd17d48e9c80ae
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaq9sIF0QJiKayMxAGQgrx-xPYBVeVRrajKAbGiN8uvQFGVtJutRG_8Df4ev4Rx4iyNVO2BU-LEcZKxR_N99ngGoeeeWhIlt4UG5FakpbPCMqkLVUU499J7kTY4n3wq5wv-8VScbqEhvVUWYHsrtUv5pBbL89c_L68PQOHf_PPVCkD7gcWnMuB5YPA7YJhk0tOTjPb7TcOAHbo8qHCgBQNqM6xz3tbKyFJ1Af1HBusGIB27U96wT0f30N0MLPFhPxJ20Vas99BuVt0Wv8jxpV_eR_P3dmVxU-PKLtOs9Z9fv_HF2r8F2zpg61MpDQjcVLgdNlklP9prPMw-tA_Q4ujDl3fzIidUKLygclU45qImFXUqUu6gc6IUkdIKQIsQygcAI7r0rJJWhxiFTdwvWmIV0O9IVGAP0Xbd1PERwqwirFJwfyYit4y72cwJx1QpaalsySeIDMIzPkcbT0kvzs3gVvbDgLxNkrfp5T1Br9aPXPShNjZVfpt6ZF0xRcnuLjTLbyYrXYp7GoS2KWMA4zEoF3yYycBV1F4RGyeID_1pMuDogQQ0dbbp3c-GvjegjGmFxdaxuWoNYKUSADehekOdsiRA4gBJTpAcDZzRz4zv1Gffu9DfkmvOuXz8fx--j-6kUu-L-ARtr5ZX8SlgqpWbop3D489fj6fdnMS005u_ZgYhSw
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data+on+farmers%E2%80%99+perception+and+acceptance+of+sustainability+standards&rft.jtitle=Data+in+brief&rft.au=Hannus%2C+Veronika&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=2352-3409&rft.eissn=2352-3409&rft.volume=32&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.dib.2020.106250&rft.externalDocID=S2352340920311446
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2352-3409&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2352-3409&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2352-3409&client=summon