Microbial community, and biochemical and physiological properties of Korean traditional black raspberry (Robus coreanus Miquel) vinegar

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to elucidate the changes in microbial community and biochemical and physiological properties of traditional Muju black raspberry (Robus coreanus Miquel) vinegar (TMBV) during fermentation by culture‐independent methods. RESULTS During vinegar fermentation, ethano...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the science of food and agriculture Vol. 96; no. 11; pp. 3723 - 3730
Main Authors Song, Nho-Eul, Cho, Sung-Ho, Baik, Sang-Ho
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.08.2016
John Wiley and Sons, Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to elucidate the changes in microbial community and biochemical and physiological properties of traditional Muju black raspberry (Robus coreanus Miquel) vinegar (TMBV) during fermentation by culture‐independent methods. RESULTS During vinegar fermentation, ethanol produced up to 120 g L−1 until day 35, with continuously increasing yeast concentration to a total of log 7.6 CFU mL−1. After day 35, acetic acid bacteria (AAB) concentrations rose to log 5.8 CFU mL−1 until day 144. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis showed that Saccharomyces cerevisiae was detected until day 87 of the fermentation, at which point Acetobacter pasteurianus gradually took over as the dominant species. Total sugar was reduced to 6.6 °Brix and total acidity produced up to 44 g L−1. CONCLUSION In this study, we established the physicochemical analysis and growth dynamics of yeast and AAB during alcoholic and acetic acid fermentation of black raspberry by a traditional method. Overall, S. cerevisiae and A. pasteurianus species appeared to dominate the TMBV fermentation. In conclusion, this study demonstrated a suitable fermentation system for TMBV by the static surface method. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry
Bibliography:ArticleID:JSFA7560
ark:/67375/WNG-GTZ43KD7-8
istex:20F6F647E40063166195D59255511B5A2F604D1B
Correction added on 30 March 2016, after first online publication: an incorrect figure was published as Figure 2. The error has been corrected in this version of the article.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-5142
1097-0010
DOI:10.1002/jsfa.7560