Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Three Treatments in Old People with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative eff...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 10; no. 4; p. e0123153 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
13.04.2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative efficacy measured by the change of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and tolerability measured by incidence of new fractures and risk of all-cause discontinuation on three treatments (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)、balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and conservative treatment (CT)).
We performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments for the old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK) and the Current Controlled Trials databases. Data from three outcomes (e.g. VAS, risk of all-cause discontinuation and incidence of new fractures) were independently extracted by two authors.
A total of five RCTs were finally included into this article. PVP and BK significantly decreased VAS when compared with CT. BK had a significantly lower risk of all-cause discontinuation contrast to CT. Three treatments (BK, PVP and CT) had no significant differences in the incidence of new fractures.
PVP may be the best way to relieve pain, CT might lead to the lowest incidence of new fractures and BK might had the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. More large-scale and longer duration of follow-up studies are needed. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative efficacy measured by the change of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and tolerability measured by incidence of new fractures and risk of all-cause discontinuation on three treatments (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)、balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and conservative treatment (CT)).PURPOSEThe question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative efficacy measured by the change of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and tolerability measured by incidence of new fractures and risk of all-cause discontinuation on three treatments (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)、balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and conservative treatment (CT)).We performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments for the old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK) and the Current Controlled Trials databases. Data from three outcomes (e.g. VAS, risk of all-cause discontinuation and incidence of new fractures) were independently extracted by two authors.METHODSWe performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments for the old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK) and the Current Controlled Trials databases. Data from three outcomes (e.g. VAS, risk of all-cause discontinuation and incidence of new fractures) were independently extracted by two authors.A total of five RCTs were finally included into this article. PVP and BK significantly decreased VAS when compared with CT. BK had a significantly lower risk of all-cause discontinuation contrast to CT. Three treatments (BK, PVP and CT) had no significant differences in the incidence of new fractures.RESULTSA total of five RCTs were finally included into this article. PVP and BK significantly decreased VAS when compared with CT. BK had a significantly lower risk of all-cause discontinuation contrast to CT. Three treatments (BK, PVP and CT) had no significant differences in the incidence of new fractures.PVP may be the best way to relieve pain, CT might lead to the lowest incidence of new fractures and BK might had the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. More large-scale and longer duration of follow-up studies are needed.CONCLUSIONSPVP may be the best way to relieve pain, CT might lead to the lowest incidence of new fractures and BK might had the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. More large-scale and longer duration of follow-up studies are needed. PurposeThe question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative efficacy measured by the change of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and tolerability measured by incidence of new fractures and risk of all-cause discontinuation on three treatments (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)、balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and conservative treatment (CT)).MethodsWe performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments for the old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK) and the Current Controlled Trials databases. Data from three outcomes (e.g. VAS, risk of all-cause discontinuation and incidence of new fractures) were independently extracted by two authors.ResultsA total of five RCTs were finally included into this article. PVP and BK significantly decreased VAS when compared with CT. BK had a significantly lower risk of all-cause discontinuation contrast to CT. Three treatments (BK, PVP and CT) had no significant differences in the incidence of new fractures.ConclusionsPVP may be the best way to relieve pain, CT might lead to the lowest incidence of new fractures and BK might had the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. More large-scale and longer duration of follow-up studies are needed. The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative efficacy measured by the change of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and tolerability measured by incidence of new fractures and risk of all-cause discontinuation on three treatments (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)、balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and conservative treatment (CT)). We performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments for the old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK) and the Current Controlled Trials databases. Data from three outcomes (e.g. VAS, risk of all-cause discontinuation and incidence of new fractures) were independently extracted by two authors. A total of five RCTs were finally included into this article. PVP and BK significantly decreased VAS when compared with CT. BK had a significantly lower risk of all-cause discontinuation contrast to CT. Three treatments (BK, PVP and CT) had no significant differences in the incidence of new fractures. PVP may be the best way to relieve pain, CT might lead to the lowest incidence of new fractures and BK might had the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. More large-scale and longer duration of follow-up studies are needed. Purpose The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative efficacy measured by the change of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and tolerability measured by incidence of new fractures and risk of all-cause discontinuation on three treatments (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)、balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and conservative treatment(CT)). Methods We performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments for the old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK) and the Current Controlled Trials databases. Data from three outcomes (e.g. VAS, risk of all-cause discontinuation and incidence of new fractures) were independently extracted by two authors. Results A total of five RCTs were finally included into this article. PVP and BK significantly decreased VAS when compared with CT. BK had a significantly lower risk of all-cause discontinuation contrast to CT. Three treatments (BK, PVP and CT) had no significant differences in the incidence of new fractures. Conclusions PVP may be the best way to relieve pain, CT might lead to the lowest incidence of new fractures and BK might had the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. More large-scale and longer duration of follow-up studies are needed. Purpose The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative efficacy measured by the change of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and tolerability measured by incidence of new fractures and risk of all-cause discontinuation on three treatments (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)、balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and conservative treatment(CT)). Methods We performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments for the old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK) and the Current Controlled Trials databases. Data from three outcomes (e.g. VAS, risk of all-cause discontinuation and incidence of new fractures) were independently extracted by two authors. Results A total of five RCTs were finally included into this article. PVP and BK significantly decreased VAS when compared with CT. BK had a significantly lower risk of all-cause discontinuation contrast to CT. Three treatments (BK, PVP and CT) had no significant differences in the incidence of new fractures. Conclusions PVP may be the best way to relieve pain, CT might lead to the lowest incidence of new fractures and BK might had the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. More large-scale and longer duration of follow-up studies are needed. |
Author | Shi, Hong-Yu Wu, Qiu-Li Feng, Shi-Qing Li, Yan Guo, Jin-Xiu Wang, Xiao-Bo Zhou, Yong Chen, Ling-Xiao Li, Yu-Lin Ning, Guang-Zhi |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People’s Republic of China University of Michigan, UNITED STATES |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: University of Michigan, UNITED STATES – name: 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People’s Republic of China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ling-Xiao surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Ling-Xiao – sequence: 2 givenname: Yu-Lin surname: Li fullname: Li, Yu-Lin – sequence: 3 givenname: Guang-Zhi surname: Ning fullname: Ning, Guang-Zhi – sequence: 4 givenname: Yan surname: Li fullname: Li, Yan – sequence: 5 givenname: Qiu-Li surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Qiu-Li – sequence: 6 givenname: Jin-Xiu surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Jin-Xiu – sequence: 7 givenname: Hong-Yu surname: Shi fullname: Shi, Hong-Yu – sequence: 8 givenname: Xiao-Bo surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Xiao-Bo – sequence: 9 givenname: Yong surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Yong – sequence: 10 givenname: Shi-Qing surname: Feng fullname: Feng, Shi-Qing |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874802$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kttuEzEQhleoiB7gDRBY4oabhLW93kMvkKKohUqFIAjcWrP2bOOwWQfbSZQn4jXx5oDaCnFle_zPN7_Hc56cdLbDJHlJ0yHlBX03tyvXQTtcxvAwpYxTwZ8kZ7TibJCzlJ_c258m597P01TwMs-fJadMlEVWpuws-T22iyU4CGaN5KppjAK1JdBpMrUtOqhNa8KW2IZMZw6RTB1CWGAXPDEdmbSafEG7bJFsTJiRiQ_xZJ0NRpEf6ALWDlrS13DovbEduXagwsrhJRmRzxg21v0knzDAYBQfs_XG74p_20bSAnrMV1wb3DxPnjbQenxxWC-S79dX0_HHwe3kw814dDtQguVhoCutS5YXleKaZ5qWTcNRa9UIpUQJSkDaaAVMVzXnUJRCQFZrldGqyrhQBb9IXu-5y9Z6eeixlzQvOGUpzXlU3OwV2sJcLp1ZgNtKC0buAtbdSXDReItSVQ0rRA1cNFkmClbprAZW5nVOgfFKRNb7Q7VVvUCtYl9jvx5AH950Zibv7FpmfTbNIuDtAeDsrxX6IBfGK2xb6NCudr6zvKzSMo_SN4-k_37dq_uO_lo5TkwUXO4FylnvHTZSmRA_yvYGTStpKvvxPMJlP57yMJ4xOXuUfOT_N-0PbVPwjA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2021_694545 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00405_020_06593_5 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_023_07041_1 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_22177 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1391243 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0178209 crossref_primary_10_1097_BSD_0000000000000601 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_017_5273_6 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0390_5616_22_05642_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_020_03382_x crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000010474 crossref_primary_10_1002_ccr3_5034 crossref_primary_10_52965_001c_38609 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000008679 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40266_017_0492_4 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000011544 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_018_4804_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_019_1499_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcb_26410 crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2018_6063 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_13253 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcp_26183 crossref_primary_10_1080_15384047_2018_1433503 crossref_primary_10_1111_cns_12727 crossref_primary_10_1042_BSR20170827 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopha_2017_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000010123 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00068_016_0747_5 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcb_26140 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcb_26266 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_020_06391_x crossref_primary_10_1002_jcb_26225 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijsu_2017_09_021 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcp_27147 crossref_primary_10_1177_1756284819890537 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_18456 crossref_primary_10_1159_000531341 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000007328 crossref_primary_10_1177_1533034617742311 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000030023 crossref_primary_10_1227_NEU_0000000000000947 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcp_26793 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_785102 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_20282 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2016_012937 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0193033 crossref_primary_10_1111_cts_12721 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcb_26115 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_19735 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_19810 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b71bd1 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4e628 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.010 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61764-X 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00026 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00148.x 10.1007/s00586-009-0986-9 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00347.x 10.1007/s00402-009-0901-1 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1371 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60733-3 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00006 10.1001/jama.2014.10397 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.038 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00002 10.1007/s00270-006-0146-0 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3180582426 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.716 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563 10.1007/s00402-010-1106-3 10.1007/s00586-012-2441-6 10.1002/jbmr.1564 10.1007/s00198-013-2574-4 10.1055/s-0029-1243631 10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3 10.1002/jbmr.364 10.3310/hta18170 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2015 Chen et al 2015 Chen et al |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2015 Chen et al 2015 Chen et al |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7RV 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU D1I DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB. KB0 KL. L6V LK8 M0K M0S M1P M7N M7P M7S NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY RC3 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0123153 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Immunology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database (ProQuest) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Journals Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Materials Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Engineering Collection Biological Sciences Agricultural Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Proquest Medical Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Engineering Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Nucleic Acids Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Entomology Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Materials Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Materials Science Database ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Agricultural Science Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Sciences (General) Nursing |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Three Treatments about Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture |
EISSN | 1932-6203 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1673120163 oai_doaj_org_article_c9f275ba35f445729d4ba286b61a2395 PMC4395314 3654879821 25874802 10_1371_journal_pone_0123153 |
Genre | Comparative Study Network Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | England United Kingdom--UK Europe China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: England – name: China – name: United Kingdom--UK – name: Europe |
GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IGS IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PV9 PYCSY RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IPNFZ NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB RIG 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. KL. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS RC3 7X8 5PM PUEGO AAPBV ABPTK BBORY ESTFP |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-d9dd82679c3d34d18ff3eddcf5cc58ac5a0fdca2d9b33a7855a4bdc4199435c73 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1932-6203 |
IngestDate | Sun Nov 05 00:20:33 EDT 2023 Wed Aug 27 01:26:14 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:33:26 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:35:12 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:26:53 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:57:25 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:18 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:25:03 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c526t-d9dd82679c3d34d18ff3eddcf5cc58ac5a0fdca2d9b33a7855a4bdc4199435c73 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 Conceived and designed the experiments: LXC SQF. Performed the experiments: YLL GZN. Analyzed the data: LXC YL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: QLW JXG HYS. Wrote the paper: LXC XBW YZ. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0123153 |
PMID | 25874802 |
PQID | 1673120163 |
PQPubID | 1436336 |
ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_1673120163 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c9f275ba35f445729d4ba286b61a2395 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4395314 proquest_miscellaneous_1674689086 proquest_journals_1673120163 pubmed_primary_25874802 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0123153 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0123153 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-04-13 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-04-13 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2015 text: 2015-04-13 day: 13 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
PublicationTitle | PloS one |
PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS One |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
References | JG Grohs (ref29) 2005; 18 A Sutton (ref15) 2008; 26 A Lovi (ref27) 2009; 18 LP Klazen CA (ref18) 2010; 376 ref11 K Kumar (ref28) 2010; 67 MH Voormolen (ref34) 2007; 28 Y Folman (ref30) 2011; 13 P Galibert (ref2) 1987; 33 IH Lieberman (ref6) 2001; 26 M Rollinghoff (ref25) 2009; 52 BC Johnston (ref16) 2014; 312 J Liu (ref8) 2013; 16 R Rousing (ref20) 2010; 35 D Wardlaw (ref21) 2009; 373 R Buchbinder (ref35) 2009; 361 I Movrin (ref26) 2010; 130 S Boonen (ref31) 2011; 26 ref42 D Felsenberg (ref1) 2002; 17 TH Diamond (ref4) 2006; 184 ref41 FR Santiago (ref24) 2010; 75 DF Kallmes (ref33) 2009; 361 ref43 JT Liu (ref19) 2010; 21 SR Garfin (ref5) 2001; 26 GC Anselmetti (ref3) 2007; 30 D Xing (ref10) 2013; 20 J Geddes (ref36) 2000; 321 XL Ma (ref9) 2012; 21 JL Zhou (ref22) 2008; 11 M Stevenson (ref39) 2014; 18 JP Jansen (ref13) 2008; 11 A Chaimani (ref14) 2013; 8 CM Beasley Jr (ref12) 2007; 27 MD Schofer (ref23) 2009; 129 R Rousing (ref32) 2009; 34 S Leucht (ref38) 2009; 373 O Lamy (ref7) 2013; 25 ref40 J Blasco (ref17) 2012; 27 S Leucht (ref37) 2013; 382 |
References_xml | – volume: 16 start-page: 455 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: ref8 article-title: Comparing pain reduction following vertebroplasty and conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials publication-title: Pain physician – volume: 35 start-page: 478 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: ref20 article-title: Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b71bd1 – volume: 34 start-page: 1349 issue: 13 year: 2009 ident: ref32 article-title: Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared to conservative treatment in patients with painful acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: three-months follow-up in a clinical randomized study publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4e628 – ident: ref43 – volume: 75 start-page: e108 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: ref24 article-title: Pain and functional outcome after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. A comparative study publication-title: European journal of radiology doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.010 – volume: 33 start-page: 166 issue: 2 year: 1987 ident: ref2 article-title: Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty publication-title: Neuro-Chirurgie – volume: 373 start-page: 31 issue: 9657 year: 2009 ident: ref38 article-title: Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61764-X – volume: 26 start-page: 1631 issue: 14 year: 2001 ident: ref6 article-title: Initial outcome and efficacy of "kyphoplasty" in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00026 – ident: ref41 – volume: 361 start-page: 557 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: ref35 article-title: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures publication-title: The New England journal of medicine doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429 – volume: 184 start-page: 113 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: ref4 article-title: Clinical outcomes after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a 2-year non-randomised trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy publication-title: The Medical journal of Australia doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00148.x – volume: 18 start-page: 95 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2009 ident: ref27 article-title: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: complementary techniques for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A prospective non-randomised study on 154 patients publication-title: European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0986-9 – volume: 11 start-page: 956 issue: 5 year: 2008 ident: ref13 article-title: Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons publication-title: Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00347.x – volume: 129 start-page: 1391 issue: 10 year: 2009 ident: ref23 article-title: Comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of fresh vertebral compression fractures publication-title: Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0901-1 – volume: 321 start-page: 1371 issue: 7273 year: 2000 ident: ref36 article-title: Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: systematic overview and meta-regression analysis publication-title: BMJ (Clinical research ed) doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1371 – volume: 382 start-page: 951 issue: 9896 year: 2013 ident: ref37 article-title: Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60733-3 – volume: 26 start-page: 753 issue: 9 year: 2008 ident: ref15 article-title: Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment publication-title: PharmacoEconomics doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00006 – volume: 312 start-page: 923 issue: 9 year: 2014 ident: ref16 article-title: Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis publication-title: Jama doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10397 – volume: 20 start-page: 795 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: ref10 article-title: A meta-analysis of balloon kyphoplasty compared to percutaneous vertebroplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures publication-title: Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.038 – volume: 373 start-page: 1016 issue: 9668 year: 2009 ident: ref21 article-title: Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE):a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6 – volume: 18 start-page: 238 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: ref29 article-title: Minimal invasive stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective nonrandomized comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty publication-title: Journal of spinal disorders & techniques – volume: 28 start-page: 555 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: ref34 article-title: Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment: short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures publication-title: The VERTOS study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol – volume: 26 start-page: 1511 issue: 14 year: 2001 ident: ref5 article-title: New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00002 – volume: 11 start-page: 42 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: ref22 article-title: Comparison of therapeutic effect between percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty on vertebral compression fracture. Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi / publication-title: Chinese Medical Association – ident: ref11 – volume: 30 start-page: 441 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: ref3 article-title: Pain relief following percutaneous vertebroplasty: results of a series of 283 consecutive patients treated in a single institution publication-title: Cardiovascular and interventional radiology doi: 10.1007/s00270-006-0146-0 – volume: 27 start-page: 252 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: ref12 article-title: All-cause treatment discontinuation in schizophrenia during treatment with olanzapine relative to other antipsychotics: an integrated analysis publication-title: Journal of clinical psychopharmacology doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3180582426 – volume: 17 start-page: 716 issue: 4 year: 2002 ident: ref1 article-title: Incidence of vertebral fracture in europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) publication-title: Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.716 – volume: 361 start-page: 569 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: ref33 article-title: A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures publication-title: The New England journal of medicine doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563 – volume: 130 start-page: 1157 issue: 9 year: 2010 ident: ref26 article-title: Adjacent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a comparison of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty publication-title: Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1106-3 – volume: 21 start-page: 1844 issue: 9 year: 2012 ident: ref9 article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2441-6 – volume: 27 start-page: 1159 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: ref17 article-title: Effect of vertebroplasty on pain relief, quality of life, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures: a 12-month randomized follow-up, controlled trial. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the publication-title: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1564 – volume: 25 start-page: 807 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: ref7 article-title: Risks and benefits of percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures publication-title: Osteoporosis International doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2574-4 – ident: ref42 – ident: ref40 – volume: 52 start-page: 233 issue: 5–6 year: 2009 ident: ref25 article-title: Effectiveness, security and height restoration on fresh compression fractures—a comparative prospective study of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty publication-title: Minimally invasive neurosurgery: MIN doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243631 – volume: 21 start-page: 359 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: ref19 article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study publication-title: Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8 – volume: 67 start-page: ons171 issue: 3 Suppl Operative year: 2010 ident: ref28 article-title: A comparative analysis of the results of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures publication-title: Neurosurgery – volume: 8 start-page: e76654 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: ref14 article-title: Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA publication-title: PloS one doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654 – volume: 13 start-page: 394 issue: 7 year: 2011 ident: ref30 article-title: A comparison of two new technologies for percutaneous vertebral augmentation: confidence vertebroplasty vs. sky kyphoplasty. The Israel Medical Association journal publication-title: IMAJ – volume: 376 start-page: 1085 issue: 9746 year: 2010 ident: ref18 article-title: Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3 – volume: 26 start-page: 1627 issue: 7 year: 2011 ident: ref31 article-title: Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures: 2-year results from a randomized trial publication-title: Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research doi: 10.1002/jbmr.364 – volume: 18 issue: 17 year: 2014 ident: ref39 article-title: Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Health Technol Assess doi: 10.3310/hta18170 |
RelatedPersons | Chen, Yu |
RelatedPersons_xml | – fullname: Chen, Yu |
SSID | ssj0053866 |
Score | 2.4335299 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise... Purpose The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and... PurposeThe question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and... Purpose The question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and... |
SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | e0123153 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Bias Biocompatibility Bone surgery Chen, Yu Compression Female Fractures Fractures, Compression - therapy Hierarchies Hospitals Humans Incidence Kyphoplasty - methods Male Medical ethics Meta-analysis Nursing Older people Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - therapy Osteoporotic Fractures - therapy Pain Pain Measurement Pain, Postoperative Psychotropic drugs Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Reproducibility of Results Risk Schizophrenia Scientific papers Spinal Fractures - therapy Studies Systematic review Technical information Treatment Outcome Vertebrae Vertebroplasty - methods Visual Analog Scale |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQLY-GtmiQOMAh7caPOOEGFVWFBCcq9Rb5KSotSdXNHvqL-JvMxN60iyr1wjV27NgzY89kZr5h7H2IIkojfBnwqCtl4L60bSXLViyis4IHuaDk5O8_6vML-e1SXd4r9UUxYQkeOG3ciWsj18oaoaKUClVBL63hTW3rynDRTuileOdtjKl0BqMU13VOlBO6Osl0Ob4e-nBMWkSlxNZFNOH1E77pclg9pGv-GzJ57w46e86eZeURPqeP3mVPQr_HdrN4ruBDxpD--IL9Ob1D9YZAMBHG3YLpPYzDEvtMIbG3MEQYkZgB5njzFVz1MCw9pNByoP-0QIkgAyrqA84LVMCZvM1LoHD0FEbbQ6Rsq_VN-AQG-hRaDr_DaEqTUU-mye9woyHlzLxkF2dff56el7kmQ-kUr8fSt96jRaJbJ7yQvmpiFMF7F5VzqjFOmUX0znDfWiGMbpQy0nonCYJYKKfFK7bTIxX2GTSWwOpNbHlEI0ghjSUO2KJl7KTXlS2Y2BCocxmwnOpmLLvJC6fRcEnb3hFZu0zWgpXzW9cJsOOR_l-I9nNfgtueHiATdpkJu8eYsGD7xDmbCVZdVWtRoW5V4_iHG256uPnd3IyCTd4a04dhPfWRddOiyVmw14n55o_kqtGyWfCC6S223FrFdkt_9WsCD0cFFI9d-eZ_LPuAPcVFKHKuVeKQ7Yw363CEOtpo307i-BdY9UGb priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwELagCIkLouXR0IIGiQMc0m5iO064oFJ1VSG1RWKL9hY5fpRKq2TZx6G_qH-TmcRJWVTBKdJ6Np5oZuwZz_gbxt47z73Q3MYOl7pYuNTGVZGIuOAjbyqeOjGiy8ln59nppfg6ldNw4LYMZZX9mtgu1LYxdEZ-mGSKJ7hbZfzz_FdMXaMouxpaaDxkjwi6jEq61HQIuNCWsyxcl-MqOQzSOZg3tTsgXyKRfGM7alH7CeV01izv8zj_Lpz8YycaP2NPgwsJR53Mt9kDV--wxyHs32HbwVyX8CFgSn98zm6P71C-4YRgI7S5AV1bmDQzpGlLZG-g8TBB4TqY9PXnS7iu4WJm4Vtbag50bgsXqBoNOu4NcgA_3GJF2ecZ0BxdWW0NY7p9tV64T3AE512pOZy5lY57FJR28u8DjjR0SYoX7HJ8Mjk-jUOPhtjINFvFtrAWIxRVGG65sEnuPXfWGi-Nkbk2Uo-8NTq1RcW5VrmUWlTWCIIk5tIo_pJt1SiPXQZ5ReD12hepx6BIykoLfGGBkbIRViVVxHgvqtIEAHPqozEr26ycwkCmE0BJAi6DgCMWD_-adwAe_6H_Qlow0BL8dvtDs7gqgzWXpvCpQga59EJIjE-sqHSaZ1WW6JQXMmK7pEP9BMvyTnsjtt_r1f3D74ZhNHTK3ujaNeuWRmR5gSFoxF51ajgwmcpciXyURkxtKOjGV2yO1Nc_WzBxdEhxGRav_83WHnuCT0lptITvs63VYu3eoDe2qt62JvcbCWk6og priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Three Treatments in Old People with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874802 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1673120163 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1674689086 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4395314 https://doaj.org/article/c9f275ba35f445729d4ba286b61a2395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123153 |
Volume | 10 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3db9MwELf2ISReEBsf6zYqI_EAD6ma2I4TJIS2qmVCajdBi_oWOf6ASVEy0lSiL_w7_JucnQ8o6sSLI8V27OTu4jvf-XcIvdKGGCqI8jT86jyqA-WlsU-9mAyNTEmg6dAeTp7OwqsF_bhkyz3U5mxtPuBqp2ln80ktymzw4_vmPQj8O5e1gfttp8FdkeuB1RFAivfRIaxN3IrqlHZ-BZDuMGwO0N3Xc2uBcjj-Fvc0K1a7dNB_Qyn_Wpsmj9GjRqnEFzUXHKE9nR-jB81GwDE6agR4hV83KNNvnqBfoz-433hsgSSE3GCRKzwvMmjjgmY3uDB4DuTWeN5GpK_wbY6vM4VvXPA5tju5-BqYpYCvWMAM8BddVtYfnWE7Rh1om-OJPY-1LvVbfIFndfA5nupKeC0uihv8c4csjWu3xVO0mIznoyuvydrgSRaEladipcBm4bEkilDlR8YQrZQ0TEoWCcnE0CgpAhWnhAgeMSZoqiS1IMWESU6eoYMc6HGCcJRaOHth4sCAmcRYKig8MAbbWVLF_bSHSEuqRDaQ5jazRpY4Px0H06YmQGIJnDQE7iGv63VXQ3r8p_2l5YKurQXkdjeK8mvSyHciYxNwmCBhhlIGFouiqQiiMA19EZCY9dCJ5aF2gFXih5z4oH2F8Pzzlq92V7_sqkH0rT9H5LpYuzY0jGIwSnvoec2G3SQDFnEaDYMe4lsMuvUW2zX57TcHLw4qKvyY6en9Mz5DD-HKrFPNJ-fooCrX-gXoZlXaR_t8yaGMRr4tJx_66PByPLv51He7HX0njrb8Of4NIZRFBQ |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9QwELZKEYIXRMvRQAEjgQQPaTc-ciAhVEpXW9rdIrFF-xYcH22lVbLsIbS_iDd-IzO5yqIKnvoaO7Gj-Tye8Yy_IeSlddwJxY1vQdX5wjLjZ0kg_IR3nM44s6KDl5P7g7B3Kj6N5GiN_GruwmBaZaMTS0VtCo1n5LtBGPEAdquQv59897FqFEZXmxIaFSyO7PIHuGyzd4cfQb6vGOseDPd7fl1VwNeShXPfJMaATR0lmhsuTBA7x60x2kmtZay0VB1ntGImyThXUSylEpnRAkl0udQRh-_eIDdh4-3giopGrYMHuiMM6-t5PAp2azTsTIrc7qDtEki-sv2VVQKQVXVczK6ycP9O1Pxj5-veI3drk5XuVRjbIGs23yS36mOGTbJRq4cZfV1zWL-5T37uX7KK0wOkqVB6SVVu6LAYQ58yJXdJC0eHACZLh02--4xe5PRkbOjnMrWd4jkxPQEoFuAoFDAD-tVO5xjtHlMco0rjzWkXb3stpvYt3aODKrWd9u1c-Q3rSjn4l5a3mlZBkQfk9Fqk95Cs5yCPLULjDMnylUuYAydMykwJ-GACnrkWJgoyj_BGVKmuCdOxbsc4LaOAEThOlQBSFHBaC9gjfvvWpCIM-U__D4iCti_SfZcPiulZWmuPVCeORTBBLp0QEvwhIzLF4jALA8V4Ij2yhRhqBpill6vFI9sNrq5uftE2g2LBaJHKbbEo-4gwTsDl9cijCobtJJmMIxF3mEeiFYCu_MVqS35xXpKXgwEMal88_ve0npPbvWH_OD0-HBw9IXfgmcQQXsC3yfp8urBPwRKcZ8_K5UfJt-te778Bcmh5oQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtQwELVKEYgXRMulKQWMBBI8pLvxJU6QECptVy2l20psq30Lji-00ipZ9iK0X8Q_8HWMEydlUQVPfY2d2NEcj2c84zMIvTKWWiapDg2oupAZosM8jViY0q5VOSWGdd3l5ON-fHDGPg35cAX9au7CuLTKRidWilqXyp2Rd6JY0Ah2q5h2rE-LON3rfRh_D10FKRdpbcpp1BA5Mosf4L5N3x_ugaxfE9LbH-wehL7CQKg4iWehTrUG-1qkimrKdJRYS43WynKleCIVl12rlSQ6zSmVIuFcslwr5gh1KVeCwndvoduC8sitMTFsnT3QI3Hsr-pREXU8MrbHZWG2nR0Tcbq0FVYVAxzD6qicXmft_p20-ccu2HuA7nvzFe_UeFtDK6ZYR3f8kcM6WvOqYorfeD7rtw_Rz90rhnG87ygrpFpgWWg8KEfQp0rPXeDS4gEAy-BBk_s-xZcFPhlpfFqluWN3ZoxPAJYlOA0lzACfm8nMRb5H2I1Rp_QWuOdufs0n5h3ewf06zR0fm5kMGwaWavAvLYc1rgMkj9DZjUjvMVotQB4bCCe5I86XNiUWHDLOc8nggyl46YppEeUBoo2oMuXJ010Nj1FWRQQFOFG1ADIn4MwLOEBh-9a4Jg_5T_-PDgVtX0f9XT0oJ98yr0kylVoiYIKUW8Y4-Eaa5ZIkcR5HktCUB2jDYagZYJpdrZwAbTW4ur75ZdsMSsZFjmRhynnVh8VJCu5vgJ7UMGwnSXgiWNIlARJLAF36i-WW4vKiIjIHYxi2ALb572m9QHdhpWefD_tHT9E9eMRdNC-iW2h1NpmbZ2AUzvLn1erD6OtNL_ffrA991w |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+Efficacy+and+Tolerability+of+Three+Treatments+in+Old+People+with+Osteoporotic+Vertebral+Compression+Fracture%3A+A+Network+Meta-Analysis+and+Systematic+Review&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Ling-Xiao%2C+Chen&rft.au=Yu-Lin%2C+Li&rft.au=Guang-Zhi+Ning&rft.au=Li%2C+Yan&rft.date=2015-04-13&rft.pub=Public+Library+of+Science&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0123153&rft.externalDocID=1673120163 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |