Coerced regimes: management challenges in the Anthropocene

• Published in: Ecology and society Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 1 - 4
• Main Authors: Angeler, David G., Chaffin, Brian C., Sundstrom, Shana M., Garmestani, Ahjond, Pope, Kevin L., Uden, Daniel R., Twidwell, Dirac, Allen, Craig R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada Resilience Alliance 2020
• Subjects: Agricultural management; alternative regimes; Anthropocene; Aquatic environment; coercion; Complex systems; Cost control; Ecology; Ekologi; Ghosts; Global climate; interdisciplinary; Management; mitigation; resilience; restoration; Side effects; Social dynamics; Social Sciences Interdisciplinary; Terrestrial environments; Tvärvetenskapliga studier; Walking; mitigation; social-ecological systems; management; coercion; coerced resilience; alternative regimes; resilience; interdisciplinary; restoration
• DOI: 10.5751/ES-11286-250104
• ISSN: 1708-3087

Management frequently creates system conditions that poorly mimic the conditions of a desirable self-organizing regime. Such management is ubiquitous across complex systems of people and nature and will likely intensify as these systems face rapid change. However, it is highly uncertain whether the costs (unintended consequences, including negative side effects) of management but also social dynamics can eventually outweigh benefits in the long term. We introduce the term "coerced regime" to conceptualize this management form and tie it into resilience theory. The concept encompasses proactive and reactive management to maintain desirable and mitigate undesirable regime conditions, respectively. A coerced regime can be quantified through a measure of the amount of management required to artificially maintain its desirable conditions. Coerced regimes comprise "ghosts" of self-sustaining desirable system regimes but ultimately become "dead regimes walking" when these regimes collapse as soon as management is discontinued. We demonstrate the broad application of coerced regimes using distinct complex systems of humans and nature (human subjects, aquatic and terrestrial environments, agriculture, and global climate). We discuss commonalities and differences between these examples to identify tradeoffs between benefits and harms of management. The concept of coerced regimes can spur thinking and inform management about the duality of what we know and can envision what we do not know and therefore cannot envision-a pervasive sustainability conundrum as planet Earth swiftly moves towards a future without historical analogue.