Mode of Action of Microbial Biological Control Agents Against Plant Diseases: Relevance Beyond Efficacy

• Published in: Frontiers in plant science Vol. 10; p. 845
• Main Authors: Köhl, Jürgen, Kolnaar, Rogier, Ravensberg, Willem J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 19.07.2019
• Subjects: antagonist; biological control; mode of action; plant diseases; Plant Science; risk assessment; screening; risk assessment; screening; biological control; plant diseases; mode of action; antagonist
• ISSN: 1664-462X; 1664-462X
• DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00845

Microbial biological control agents (MBCAs) are applied to crops for biological control of plant pathogens where they act via a range of modes of action. Some MBCAs interact with plants by inducing resistance or priming plants without any direct interaction with the targeted pathogen. Other MBCAs act via nutrient competition or other mechanisms modulating the growth conditions for the pathogen. Antagonists acting through hyperparasitism and antibiosis are directly interfering with the pathogen. Such interactions are highly regulated cascades of metabolic events, often combining different modes of action. Compounds involved such as signaling compounds, enzymes and other interfering metabolites are produced at low concentrations during interaction. The potential of microorganisms to produce such a compound does not necessarily correlate with their antagonism. Understanding the mode of action of MBCAs is essential to achieve optimum disease control. Also understanding the mode of action is important to be able to characterize possible risks for humans or the environment and risks for resistance development against the MBCA. Preferences for certain modes of action for an envisaged application of a MBCA also have impact on the screening methods used to select new microbials. Screening of MBCAs in bioassays on plants or plant tissues has the advantage that MBCAs with multiple modes of action and their combinations potentially can be detected whereas simplified assays on nutrient media strongly bias the selection toward production of antimicrobial metabolites which may not be responsible for antagonism. Risks assessments for MBCAs are relevant if they contain antimicrobial metabolites at effective concentration in the product. However, in most cases antimicrobial metabolites are produced by antagonists directly on the spot where the targeted organism is harmful. Such ubiquitous metabolites involved in natural, complex, highly regulated interactions between microbial cells and/or plants are not relevant for risk assessments. Currently, risks of microbial metabolites involved in antagonistic modes of action are often assessed similar to assessments of single molecule fungicides. The nature of the mode of action of antagonists requires a rethinking of data requirements for the registration of MBCAs.