Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: A practical approach

Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand ov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDigestive and liver disease Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 87 - 95
Main Authors Parente, F., Marino, B., Crosta, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1590-8658
1878-3562
1878-3562
DOI10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005

Cover

Abstract Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phoshate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs.
AbstractList Abstract Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phoshate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs.
Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phosphate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs.Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phosphate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs.
Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phosphate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs.
Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phoshate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs.
Author Parente, F.
Crosta, C.
Marino, B.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: F.
  surname: Parente
  fullname: Parente, F.
  email: f.parente@ospedale.lecco.it, fabrizio.parente@tiscalinet.it
  organization: Gastrointestinal Unit, A. Manzoni Hospital, 23900 Lecco, Italy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: B.
  surname: Marino
  fullname: Marino, B.
  organization: Gastrointestinal Unit, A. Manzoni Hospital, 23900 Lecco, Italy
– sequence: 3
  givenname: C.
  surname: Crosta
  fullname: Crosta, C.
  organization: Division of Endoscopy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18676211$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkk9v1DAQxS1URP_AB-CCfOKWMOMkXgckpFK1FKlSD8DZcpwJ9ZK1g50F7bfH6RYOldqebFnv90Z-b47ZgQ-eGHuNUCKgfLcu-7EvBYAqQZYAzTN2hGqliqqR4iDfmxYKJRt1yI5TWgMIlA28YIeo5EoKxCPmP4U_NPIp0mSimV3wvKMhROI2jMGHZMO0487z-YY4RcPDwDcmJZ5sJPLO_-BZfSsuItnZjNwabym-56fZ1djZ2fxmpikGY29esueDGRO9ujtP2PeL829nl8XV9ecvZ6dXhW2EmAsiqluDIFSHvYDWWgmm7waUxjQdmg6hAVs3AqthWHVtWw8dYF0rJbEiAdUJe7v3zWN_bSnNeuOSpXE0nsI2aSkVtJWUWfjmTrjtNtTrKbqNiTv9L6EsWO0FNoaUIg3auvk2qDkaN2oEvXSh1zp3oZcuNEidu8gk3iP_mz_CfNgzlMP57SjqZB3lPHu3pKv74B6lP96j7ej8UsBP2lFah230OXWNOgkN-uuyH8t6gMqrsf9s-7DBE8P_Ai9VyZ8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_04786_y
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0101_98802010000300016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2011_10_007
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12029_010_9190_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jct_2010_08_017
crossref_primary_10_3109_00365521003734158
crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v5_i9_433
crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2017_155
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_016_5214_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2014_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2012_02_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_endomx_2016_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10151_014_1198_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2012_07_011
crossref_primary_10_17116_endoskop201521330_36
crossref_primary_10_1002_hsr2_2047
crossref_primary_10_61186_armaghanj_28_3_371
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiochem_2011_10_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2013_02_024
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2012_441
crossref_primary_10_1097_SGA_0b013e3181ca05e4
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000000760
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmedr_2024_102636
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12030747
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2012_304292
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v20_i30_10620
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00384_015_2307_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2021_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2013_07_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2017_07_047
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v20_i37_13591
crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2022_2106154
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0b013e31828e389d
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12664_021_01228_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_013_2598_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_SGA_0000000000000237
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v24_i26_2833
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10689_012_9517_7
crossref_primary_10_1097_SGA_0b013e318255b94a
crossref_primary_10_23922_jarc_2023_030
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2013_06_002
Cites_doi 10.1055/s-2007-1018281
10.1016/0016-5085(83)90373-6
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00158-0
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03496.x
10.2165/00003495-200868040-00003
10.1007/BF02054117
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)00371-8
10.1007/BF02054413
10.3322/canjclin.51.1.38
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03677.x
10.1136/bmj.333.7568.589
10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80008-2
10.1111/j.1742-1241.1996.tb10032.x
10.1080/00365520701843001
10.1016/S0016-5085(82)80390-9
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00970.x
10.1007/BF02554091
10.1055/s-2006-925259
10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.011
10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01259.x
10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.051
10.1055/s-2003-41507
10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.005
10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.037
10.1067/mge.2003.294
10.1007/s11894-004-0056-8
10.1016/0016-5085(80)90781-7
10.1007/BF02258217
10.1016/S0016-5085(24)05135-7
10.1001/archinte.168.6.593
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03212.x
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02776-2
10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70191-9
10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70163-X
10.1053/gast.2003.50044
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01857-7
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x
10.1067/mge.2002.125361
10.1097/00001610-200405000-00004
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00635-2
10.1159/000018802
10.1111/j.1445-5994.1991.tb01387.x
10.2165/00002018-200427150-00006
10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.918
10.1136/gut.2003.016436
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02332.x
10.1681/ASN.2005050496
10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70213-8
10.1055/s-2003-38150
10.1136/bmj.39321.527384.BE
10.1007/BF02048160
10.1067/mge.2001.116562
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x
10.1007/BF02806525
10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00007
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05827.x
10.1185/030079908X260844
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.
Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.
– notice: Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1878-3562
EndPage 95
ExternalDocumentID 18676211
10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005
S1590865808002211
1_s2_0_S1590865808002211
Genre Historical Article
Journal Article
Review
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FD8
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OC.
ON0
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
Z5R
~G-
AACTN
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-eee49a1028b1d209cc60adbf16aa5b1ab1050c45213ff7b994fb014488613e203
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1590-8658
1878-3562
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 11:30:08 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:07:51 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:15:57 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:15:13 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:46 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:09:05 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords NaP compounds
Stimulant laxatives
Oral bowel preparations
Colonoscopy
PEG solution
Colon cancer screening
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c522t-eee49a1028b1d209cc60adbf16aa5b1ab1050c45213ff7b994fb014488613e203
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
PMID 18676211
PQID 66809366
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_66809366
pubmed_primary_18676211
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1590865808002211
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2009
  text: 2009-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle Digestive and liver disease
PublicationTitleAlternate Dig Liver Dis
PublicationYear 2009
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Parente, Marino, Armellino, Redaelli, Invernizzi, Moretti (bib45) 2007; 56
Lieberman, Holub, Eisen, Kraemer, Morris (bib7) 2005; 62
Dominitz (bib41) 2006; 64
Padayatty, Levine (bib57) 2001; 164
Szojda, Kuik, Mulder, Felt-Bersma (bib24) 2008; 43
Ell, Fischbach, Bronisch, Dertinger, Layer, Runzi (bib58) 2008; 103
Froehlich, Wietlisbach, Gonvers, Burnand, Vader (bib9) 2005; 61
Clark, DiPalma (bib17) 2004; 27
Guller, Reichlin, Jost (bib31) 1996; 126
DiPalma, Brady, Stewart, Kerlin, McKinney, Clement (bib16) 1984; 86
Pignone, Saha, Hoerger, Mandelblatt (bib4) 2002; 137
Hsu, Imperiale (bib25) 1998; 48
Golub, Kerner, Wise (bib43) 1995; 58
Thomas, Brozisky, Isenberg (bib21) 1982; 82
Woo, Crail, Curry, Geddes (bib39) 2006; 333
Felt-Bersma, Kooyman, Kuipers (bib49) 2004; 148
Iida, Miura, Asada (bib64) 1992; 27
Rex, Chasen, Pochapin (bib32) 2002; 16
Rex, Bond, Feld (bib14) 2001; 96
Adams, Meagher, Lubowski, King (bib55) 1994; 27
Harewood, Sharma, de Garmo (bib8) 2003; 58
Cohen, Wexner, Binderow, Nogueras, Daniel, Ehrenpreis (bib47) 1994; 37
Markowitz, Stokes, Radhakrishnan, D’Agati (bib40) 2005; 16
Marshall, Pineda, Barthel, King (bib44) 1993; 39
Beck, Harford, DiPalma (bib15) 1985; 28
Chakravarty, Fraser, Hamilton, Lane (bib50) 1991; 21
Davis, Santa Ana, Morawski, Fordtran (bib20) 1980; 78
Hamilton, Mulcahy, Walsh, Farrelly, Tormey, Watson (bib62) 1996; 50
Ballinger, Anggiansah (bib5) 2007; 335
Khashab, Rex (bib34) 2005; 21
Winawer (bib2) 2003; 12
Berkelhammer, Ekambaram, Silva (bib30) 2002; 56
Tan, Tjandra (bib36) 2006; 8
Khurana, McLean, Atkinson, Foulks (bib37) 2008; 168
Smith, von Eschenbach, Wender, Levin, Byers, Rothenberger (bib3) 2001; 51
Unal, Dogan, Dumlu, Ozturk, Cindoruk (bib33) 1996; 7
Church (bib51) 1998; 41
Barthet, Ponchon, Coffin, Bitoun, Dugue, Halphen (bib59) 2004; 59
Worthington, Thyssen, Chapman, Chapman, Geraint (bib60) 2008; 24
Brown, DiPalma (bib19) 2004; 6
Ransohoff (bib1) 2005; 128
Belsey, Epstein, Heresbach (bib46) 2007; 25
Shawki, Wexner (bib23) 2008; 68
Linden, Waye (bib26) 1999; 50
Maa, Ng, Mui (bib38) 2003; 35
Martinek, Hess, Delarive, Jornod, Blum, Pantoflickova (bib53) 2001; 54
Aoun, Abdul-Baki, Azar, Mourad, Barada, Berro (bib56) 2005; 62
Ernstoff, Howard, Marshall, Jumshy, McCullough (bib22) 1983; 84
Bowles, Leicester, Romaya, Swarbrick, Williams, Epstein (bib11) 2004; 53
Reilly, Walker (bib18) 2004; 27
Afridi, Barthel, King, Pineda, Marshall (bib61) 1995; 41
Balaban, Leavell, Oblinger, Thompson, Bolton, Pambianco (bib28) 2003; 98
Rosch, Classen (bib52) 1987; 19
Lapalus, Gaudin, Lemkecher, Souquet, Wendehenne, Peltrault (bib27) 2001; 25
Yoshioka, Connolly, Ogunbiyi, Hasegawa, Morton, Keighley (bib63) 2000; 17
Radaelli, Meucci, Imperiali, Spinzi, Strocchi, Terruzzi (bib65) 2005; 100
Thomas-Gibson, Rogers, Cooper, Man, Rutter, Suzuki (bib10) 2006; 38
Seeff, Richards, Shapiro, Nadel, Manninen, Given (bib6) 2004; 127
Canard, Arpurt, Boustiere (bib12) 2006; 38
Ell, Fischbach, Keller, Dehe, Mayer, Schneider (bib48) 2003; 35
Rex, Imperiale, Latinovich, Bratcher (bib13) 2002; 97
Barclay (bib29) 2004; 60
Lichtestein, Grandhi, Schmalz, Lottes, Forbes, Walker (bib35) 2007; 26
Wexner, Beck, Baron, Fanelli, Hyman, Shan (bib54) 2006; 63
Rejchrt, Bures, Siroky, Kopacova, Slezak, Lengr (bib42) 2004; 59
Adams (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib55) 1994; 27
Lieberman (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib7) 2005; 62
Ell (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib58) 2008; 103
Balaban (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib28) 2003; 98
Beck (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib15) 1985; 28
Linden (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib26) 1999; 50
Pignone (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib4) 2002; 137
Golub (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib43) 1995; 58
Canard (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib12) 2006; 38
Ell (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib48) 2003; 35
Parente (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib45) 2007; 56
Winawer (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib2) 2003; 12
Martinek (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib53) 2001; 54
Tan (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib36) 2006; 8
Ernstoff (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib22) 1983; 84
Chakravarty (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib50) 1991; 21
Iida (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib64) 1992; 27
Barclay (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib29) 2004; 60
Maa (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib38) 2003; 35
Berkelhammer (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib30) 2002; 56
Radaelli (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib65) 2005; 100
Lichtestein (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib35) 2007; 26
Rex (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib13) 2002; 97
Thomas-Gibson (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib10) 2006; 38
Reilly (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib18) 2004; 27
Rex (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib14) 2001; 96
Rex (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib32) 2002; 16
Szojda (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib24) 2008; 43
Dominitz (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib41) 2006; 64
Harewood (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib8) 2003; 58
Froehlich (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib9) 2005; 61
Clark (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib17) 2004; 27
Guller (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib31) 1996; 126
Shawki (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib23) 2008; 68
Barthet (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib59) 2004; 59
Rejchrt (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib42) 2004; 59
Rosch (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib52) 1987; 19
Seeff (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib6) 2004; 127
Davis (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib20) 1980; 78
Markowitz (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib40) 2005; 16
Khashab (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib34) 2005; 21
Yoshioka (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib63) 2000; 17
Padayatty (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib57) 2001; 164
Felt-Bersma (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib49) 2004; 148
Bowles (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib11) 2004; 53
Hamilton (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib62) 1996; 50
Ballinger (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib5) 2007; 335
Ransohoff (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib1) 2005; 128
Khurana (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib37) 2008; 168
DiPalma (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib16) 1984; 86
Belsey (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib46) 2007; 25
Lapalus (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib27) 2001; 25
Unal (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib33) 1996; 7
Wexner (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib54) 2006; 63
Afridi (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib61) 1995; 41
Smith (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib3) 2001; 51
Brown (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib19) 2004; 6
Aoun (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib56) 2005; 62
Church (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib51) 1998; 41
Woo (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib39) 2006; 333
Marshall (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib44) 1993; 39
Hsu (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib25) 1998; 48
Worthington (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib60) 2008; 24
Cohen (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib47) 1994; 37
Thomas (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib21) 1982; 82
References_xml – volume: 98
  start-page: 827
  year: 2003
  end-page: 832
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized,endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate vs. tablet sodium phosphate
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 41
  start-page: 485
  year: 1995
  end-page: 489
  ident: bib61
  article-title: Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 58
  start-page: 76
  year: 2003
  end-page: 79
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 164
  start-page: 353
  year: 2001
  end-page: 355
  ident: bib57
  article-title: New insights into the physiology of vitamin C
  publication-title: Can Med Assoc J
– volume: 12
  start-page: 544
  year: 2003
  end-page: 560
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—updated based on new evidence
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 38
  start-page: 456
  year: 2006
  end-page: 460
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 35
  start-page: 300
  year: 2003
  end-page: 304
  ident: bib48
  article-title: A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and the efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 63
  start-page: 894
  year: 2006
  end-page: 909
  ident: bib54
  article-title: A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the Americal Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 62
  start-page: 213
  year: 2005
  end-page: 218
  ident: bib56
  article-title: A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 127
  start-page: 1670
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1677
  ident: bib6
  article-title: How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1352
  year: 1996
  end-page: 1357
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Colonic preparation with sodium phosphate. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study with various antiemetics
  publication-title: Schweiz Med Wochenschr
– volume: 6
  start-page: 395
  year: 2004
  end-page: 401
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Bowel preparation for gastrointestinal procedures
  publication-title: Curr Gastroenterol Rep
– volume: 53
  start-page: 277
  year: 2004
  end-page: 283
  ident: bib11
  article-title: A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 27
  start-page: 115
  year: 2004
  end-page: 117
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Reasons for poor colonic preparation for inpatients
  publication-title: Gastroenterol Nurs
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1687
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1690
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 39
  start-page: 631
  year: 1993
  end-page: 634
  ident: bib44
  article-title: Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol electrlyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 43
  start-page: 622
  year: 2008
  end-page: 626
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Colonic lavage with two polyethylene glycol solutions prior to colonoscopy makes no difference: a prospective randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol
– volume: 59
  start-page: 651
  year: 2004
  end-page: 654
  ident: bib42
  article-title: A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phophate fro colon cleansing before colonoscopy
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 24
  start-page: 481
  year: 2008
  end-page: 488
  ident: bib60
  article-title: A randomised controlled trial of a new 2
  publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin
– volume: 50
  start-page: 73
  year: 1996
  end-page: 75
  ident: bib62
  article-title: Sodium picosulfate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomized trial
  publication-title: Br J Clin Pract
– volume: 16
  start-page: 937
  year: 2002
  end-page: 944
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Safety and efficacy of two reduced dosing regimens of sodium phosphate tablets for preparation prior to colonoscopy
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 51
  start-page: 38
  year: 2001
  end-page: 75
  ident: bib3
  article-title: American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update for early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– volume: 27
  start-page: 229
  year: 1994
  end-page: 233
  ident: bib55
  article-title: Bisacodyl reduces the volume of PEG solution required for bowel preparation
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
– volume: 103
  start-page: 883
  year: 2008
  end-page: 893
  ident: bib58
  article-title: Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 56
  start-page: 89
  year: 2002
  end-page: 94
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 8
  start-page: 247
  year: 2006
  end-page: 258
  ident: bib36
  article-title: Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Colorectal Dis
– volume: 35
  start-page: 717
  year: 2003
  ident: bib38
  article-title: Severe hyperphosphate and hypercalcemia following sodium phosphate bowel preparation: a forgotten menace
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1235
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1242
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Safety issues regarding colonic cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures
  publication-title: Drug Saf
– volume: 7
  start-page: 350
  year: 1996
  end-page: 354
  ident: bib33
  article-title: A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90-ml oral sodium phosphate with X-Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Turk J Gastroenterol
– volume: 54
  start-page: 180
  year: 2001
  end-page: 185
  ident: bib53
  article-title: Cisapride does not improve the precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 96
  start-page: 952
  year: 2001
  end-page: 957
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopies
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 148
  start-page: 181
  year: 2004
  end-page: 185
  ident: bib49
  article-title: Colonic lavage prior to colonoscopy: comparable outcomes of two polyethylene-glycol preparations and a sodium-phopshate solution
  publication-title: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
– volume: 78
  start-page: 991
  year: 1980
  end-page: 995
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Development of a lavage solution with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 168
  start-page: 593
  year: 2008
  end-page: 597
  ident: bib37
  article-title: The effect of oral sodium phosphate drug products on renal function in adults unddergoing bowel endoscopy
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
– volume: 58
  start-page: 594
  year: 1995
  end-page: 597
  ident: bib43
  article-title: Colonoscopic preparations—which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
– volume: 128
  start-page: 1685
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1695
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Colon cancer screening in 2005: status and challenges
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 38
  start-page: A1467
  year: 2006
  ident: bib12
  article-title: La coloscopie en France en 2004: resultat d’une enquete prospective nationale de la Societè Francaise d’Endoscopie Digestive
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 86
  start-page: 856
  year: 1984
  end-page: 860
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Comparison of colon cleansing in preparation for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 62
  start-page: 875
  year: 2005
  end-page: 883
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 60
  start-page: 527
  year: 2004
  end-page: 533
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Safety, efficacy, and patient tolerance of a three-dose regimen of orally administered aqueous sodium phosphate fro colonic cleansing before colonoscopy
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 333
  start-page: 589
  year: 2006
  end-page: 590
  ident: bib39
  article-title: A life-threatening complication after ingestion of sodium phosphate bowel preparation
  publication-title: Br Med J
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1223
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1225
  ident: bib51
  article-title: Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy—timing is the key!
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
– volume: 100
  start-page: 2674
  year: 2005
  end-page: 2680
  ident: bib65
  article-title: High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 48
  start-page: 276
  year: 1998
  end-page: 282
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phopshate for colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 21
  start-page: 465
  year: 2005
  end-page: 468
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phopshate tablets and a reduced sodium phosphate dose in colon cleansing: a single-center open-label pilot trial
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 19
  start-page: 198
  year: 1987
  end-page: 200
  ident: bib52
  article-title: Fractional cleansing of the large bowel with Golytely for colonoscopic preparations: a controlled trial
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 335
  start-page: 715
  year: 2007
  end-page: 718
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Brit Med J
– volume: 25
  start-page: 373
  year: 2007
  end-page: 384
  ident: bib46
  article-title: Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 21
  start-page: 769
  year: 1991
  end-page: 771
  ident: bib50
  article-title: A randomized blinded study in colonic lavage for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Aust NZ J Med
– volume: 68
  start-page: 417
  year: 2008
  end-page: 437
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults
  publication-title: Drugs
– volume: 50
  start-page: 811
  year: 1999
  end-page: 813
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: onset and duration of bowel activity
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 17
  start-page: 66
  year: 2000
  end-page: 70
  ident: bib63
  article-title: Randomized trial of oral sodium phopshate compared with oral sodium picosulfate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy
  publication-title: Dig Surg
– volume: 82
  start-page: 435
  year: 1982
  end-page: 437
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage soloution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 84
  start-page: 435
  year: 1983
  end-page: 437
  ident: bib22
  article-title: A randomized blinded critical trail of a rapid colonic lavage solution compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 25
  start-page: 29
  year: 2001
  end-page: 34
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Prospective randomized single-blind trial comparing oral sodium phopshate with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastroenterol Clin Biol
– volume: 56
  start-page: A25
  year: 2007
  ident: bib45
  article-title: Mass screening of colorectal cancer with an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in Italy. Preliminary results in a pilot province
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 59
  start-page: S1568
  year: 2004
  ident: bib59
  article-title: A new 2
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 27
  start-page: 728
  year: 1992
  end-page: 733
  ident: bib64
  article-title: Bowel preparation for the total colonoscopy by 2000
  publication-title: Gastroenterol Jpn
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1361
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1370
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Clinical trial: sodium phosphate tablets are preferred and better tolerated by patients compared to polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 28
  start-page: 491
  year: 1985
  end-page: 495
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
– volume: 37
  start-page: 689
  year: 1994
  end-page: 696
  ident: bib47
  article-title: Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
– volume: 137
  start-page: 96
  year: 2002
  end-page: 104
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 61
  start-page: 378
  year: 2005
  end-page: 384
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 16
  start-page: 3389
  year: 2005
  end-page: 3396
  ident: bib40
  article-title: Acute phopshate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underecognized cause of chronica renal failure
  publication-title: Am Soc Nephrol
– volume: 64
  start-page: 553
  year: 2006
  end-page: 555
  ident: bib41
  article-title: Take two phophosodas and scope them in the morning
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 19
  start-page: 198
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib52
  article-title: Fractional cleansing of the large bowel with Golytely for colonoscopic preparations: a controlled trial
  publication-title: Endoscopy
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018281
– volume: 56
  start-page: A25
  issue: Suppl. 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib45
  article-title: Mass screening of colorectal cancer with an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in Italy. Preliminary results in a pilot province
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 164
  start-page: 353
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib57
  article-title: New insights into the physiology of vitamin C
  publication-title: Can Med Assoc J
– volume: 84
  start-page: 435
  year: 1983
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib22
  article-title: A randomized blinded critical trail of a rapid colonic lavage solution compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(83)90373-6
– volume: 7
  start-page: 350
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib33
  article-title: A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90-ml oral sodium phosphate with X-Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Turk J Gastroenterol
– volume: 59
  start-page: 651
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib42
  article-title: A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phophate fro colon cleansing before colonoscopy
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00158-0
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1361
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib35
  article-title: Clinical trial: sodium phosphate tablets are preferred and better tolerated by patients compared to polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03496.x
– volume: 68
  start-page: 417
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib23
  article-title: Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults
  publication-title: Drugs
  doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868040-00003
– volume: 58
  start-page: 594
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib43
  article-title: Colonoscopic preparations—which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
  doi: 10.1007/BF02054117
– volume: 100
  start-page: 2674
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib65
  article-title: High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x
– volume: 62
  start-page: 213
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib56
  article-title: A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)00371-8
– volume: 37
  start-page: 689
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib47
  article-title: Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
  doi: 10.1007/BF02054413
– volume: 51
  start-page: 38
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib3
  article-title: American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update for early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/canjclin.51.1.38
– volume: 96
  start-page: 952
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib14
  article-title: Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopies
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03677.x
– volume: 333
  start-page: 589
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib39
  article-title: A life-threatening complication after ingestion of sodium phosphate bowel preparation
  publication-title: Br Med J
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7568.589
– volume: 41
  start-page: 485
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib61
  article-title: Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80008-2
– volume: 50
  start-page: 73
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib62
  article-title: Sodium picosulfate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomized trial
  publication-title: Br J Clin Pract
  doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.1996.tb10032.x
– volume: 43
  start-page: 622
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib24
  article-title: Colonic lavage with two polyethylene glycol solutions prior to colonoscopy makes no difference: a prospective randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1080/00365520701843001
– volume: 82
  start-page: 435
  year: 1982
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib21
  article-title: Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage soloution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(82)80390-9
– volume: 8
  start-page: 247
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib36
  article-title: Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Colorectal Dis
  doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00970.x
– volume: 28
  start-page: 491
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib15
  article-title: Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
  doi: 10.1007/BF02554091
– volume: 38
  start-page: 456
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib10
  article-title: Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates
  publication-title: Endoscopy
  doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925259
– volume: 64
  start-page: 553
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib41
  article-title: Take two phophosodas and scope them in the morning
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.011
– volume: 16
  start-page: 937
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib32
  article-title: Safety and efficacy of two reduced dosing regimens of sodium phosphate tablets for preparation prior to colonoscopy
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01259.x
– volume: 127
  start-page: 1670
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib6
  article-title: How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.051
– volume: 35
  start-page: 717
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib38
  article-title: Severe hyperphosphate and hypercalcemia following sodium phosphate bowel preparation: a forgotten menace
  publication-title: Endoscopy
  doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41507
– volume: 128
  start-page: 1685
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib1
  article-title: Colon cancer screening in 2005: status and challenges
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.005
– volume: 62
  start-page: 875
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib7
  article-title: Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.037
– volume: 58
  start-page: 76
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib8
  article-title: Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.294
– volume: 6
  start-page: 395
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib19
  article-title: Bowel preparation for gastrointestinal procedures
  publication-title: Curr Gastroenterol Rep
  doi: 10.1007/s11894-004-0056-8
– volume: 78
  start-page: 991
  year: 1980
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib20
  article-title: Development of a lavage solution with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(80)90781-7
– volume: 25
  start-page: 29
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib27
  article-title: Prospective randomized single-blind trial comparing oral sodium phopshate with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastroenterol Clin Biol
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1223
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib51
  article-title: Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy—timing is the key!
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
  doi: 10.1007/BF02258217
– volume: 86
  start-page: 856
  year: 1984
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib16
  article-title: Comparison of colon cleansing in preparation for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(24)05135-7
– volume: 38
  start-page: A1467
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib12
  article-title: La coloscopie en France en 2004: resultat d’une enquete prospective nationale de la Societè Francaise d’Endoscopie Digestive
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 168
  start-page: 593
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib37
  article-title: The effect of oral sodium phosphate drug products on renal function in adults unddergoing bowel endoscopy
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.6.593
– volume: 25
  start-page: 373
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib46
  article-title: Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03212.x
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1352
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib31
  article-title: Colonic preparation with sodium phosphate. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study with various antiemetics
  publication-title: Schweiz Med Wochenschr
– volume: 61
  start-page: 378
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib9
  article-title: Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02776-2
– volume: 48
  start-page: 276
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib25
  article-title: Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phopshate for colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70191-9
– volume: 50
  start-page: 811
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib26
  article-title: Sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: onset and duration of bowel activity
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70163-X
– volume: 12
  start-page: 544
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib2
  article-title: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—updated based on new evidence
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50044
– volume: 60
  start-page: 527
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib29
  article-title: Safety, efficacy, and patient tolerance of a three-dose regimen of orally administered aqueous sodium phosphate fro colonic cleansing before colonoscopy
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01857-7
– volume: 103
  start-page: 883
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib58
  article-title: Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG+electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x
– volume: 148
  start-page: 181
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib49
  article-title: Colonic lavage prior to colonoscopy: comparable outcomes of two polyethylene-glycol preparations and a sodium-phopshate solution
  publication-title: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
– volume: 56
  start-page: 89
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib30
  article-title: Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.125361
– volume: 27
  start-page: 115
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib18
  article-title: Reasons for poor colonic preparation for inpatients
  publication-title: Gastroenterol Nurs
  doi: 10.1097/00001610-200405000-00004
– volume: 59
  start-page: S1568
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib59
  article-title: A new 2l gut lavage solution: Results of a prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial comparing PEG+Ascorbic acid solution versus a sodium phosphate solution
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00635-2
– volume: 17
  start-page: 66
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib63
  article-title: Randomized trial of oral sodium phopshate compared with oral sodium picosulfate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy
  publication-title: Dig Surg
  doi: 10.1159/000018802
– volume: 21
  start-page: 769
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib50
  article-title: A randomized blinded study in colonic lavage for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Aust NZ J Med
  doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1991.tb01387.x
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1235
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib17
  article-title: Safety issues regarding colonic cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures
  publication-title: Drug Saf
  doi: 10.2165/00002018-200427150-00006
– volume: 63
  start-page: 894
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib54
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.918
– volume: 53
  start-page: 277
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib11
  article-title: A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.016436
– volume: 21
  start-page: 465
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib34
  article-title: Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phopshate tablets and a reduced sodium phosphate dose in colon cleansing: a single-center open-label pilot trial
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02332.x
– volume: 16
  start-page: 3389
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib40
  article-title: Acute phopshate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underecognized cause of chronica renal failure
  publication-title: Am Soc Nephrol
  doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050496
– volume: 39
  start-page: 631
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib44
  article-title: Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol electrlyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70213-8
– volume: 35
  start-page: 300
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib48
  article-title: A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and the efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy
  publication-title: Endoscopy
  doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38150
– volume: 335
  start-page: 715
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib5
  article-title: Colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Brit Med J
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.39321.527384.BE
– volume: 27
  start-page: 229
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib55
  article-title: Bisacodyl reduces the volume of PEG solution required for bowel preparation
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
  doi: 10.1007/BF02048160
– volume: 54
  start-page: 180
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib53
  article-title: Cisapride does not improve the precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.116562
– volume: 98
  start-page: 827
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib28
  article-title: Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized,endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate vs. tablet sodium phosphate
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x
– volume: 27
  start-page: 728
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib64
  article-title: Bowel preparation for the total colonoscopy by 2000ml of balanced lavage solution (GoLytely) and sennoside
  publication-title: Gastroenterol Jpn
  doi: 10.1007/BF02806525
– volume: 137
  start-page: 96
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib4
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00007
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1687
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib13
  article-title: Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05827.x
– volume: 24
  start-page: 481
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib60
  article-title: A randomised controlled trial of a new 2l polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium picosulphate+magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy
  publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin
  doi: 10.1185/030079908X260844
SSID ssj0021650
Score 2.0628252
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the...
Abstract Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions;...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 87
SubjectTerms Cathartics - administration & dosage
Colon
Colon cancer screening
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy - history
Colonoscopy - methods
Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control
Drug Therapy, Combination
Early Detection of Cancer
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
History, 20th Century
Humans
Intestinal Mucosa - drug effects
Laxatives - administration & dosage
Mass Screening - methods
NaP compounds
Oral bowel preparations
PEG solution
Phosphates - administration & dosage
Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage
Preoperative Care - history
Preoperative Care - methods
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stimulant laxatives
Surface-Active Agents - administration & dosage
Therapeutic Irrigation - methods
Treatment Outcome
Title Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: A practical approach
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1590865808002211
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1590865808002211
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18676211
https://www.proquest.com/docview/66809366
Volume 41
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELWqIiEuCFo-lkLxAXFACmsnjjfhtlRUC6i9QKXeLNuZSFttndXuVlUv_HZmHGcRghaJSw7RWEns8cxz5s0MY288GsZCT5qsBm0zVYHM6sbneGmd8qW3MpLHT0717Ex9OS_Pd9jRkAtDtMpk-3ubHq11ujNOszlezufjb5LadaMDjZgnj_m9Sk1I19__2NI8cqljl1YSzkh6iGxGjlezaBKdkkIS5W2-6TbsGX3Q8SP2MIFHPu3f7zHbgbDH9qcBD86XN_wtj3TO-J98j90_SVHzfRY-dtew4MsV9IW-u8AdIFgFTiWrQ0eZKTd8HjiCQQ4ry7uWXyKo5mhS8JiLzo2jdBTOaLLwFTwpy-oDn_KUZoX3hvLkT9jZ8afvR7Ms9VnIPKKvTQYAqraENJxsclF7r4VtXCu1taWT1iEGE16hoy_aduLqWrWODmJVhVgAclE8ZbuhC_CccbCqFkWRtxVQL2uEj5WlCjhtVQoFXo-YGGbY-FSEnHphLMzANrswuCipOSYx7soRe7cdsuwrcNwlnA_LZobUUjSGBv3DXYMmfxsE67Sd10aadW6E-UPlRkxtR_6mtf964OtBowzuZgrR2ADd1dpoXYm60DhPz3pF-_XJlUa_JeWL_3vkAXvQx8GIiPOS7W5WV_AK4dTGHcb9csjuTT9_nZ3-BPVAHIU
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swED9KCttextbuI_uqHsYeBiaSLSv23rKykq5NXtZC34QsnyEjlUOSMvrf7yTLGWNrB3vxg9AhWzrd_c73BfDekmDM1LhOSlQmkQWKpKxtSo-mkja3RoTg8dlcTS_l16v8ag-O-1wYH1YZZX8n04O0jiOjuJuj1WIx-iZ8u25SoAHzpD6_d1_mZO0NYH9yejad7-wuoUKjVj8_8QS9czOEedXLOkZUeq9Efpd6ugt-BjV08gQeR_zIJt0rPoU9dAdwOHFkO1_fsg8sRHSGX-UH8GAWHeeH4D63P3DJVmvsan23jlVIeBWZr1rtWp-ccssWjhEeZLg2rG3YNeFqRlKFLF3Sb4xmh8mJ3y96Bev5Zf2JTVjMtKKxvkL5M7g8-XJxPE1iq4XEEgDbJogoS-PBRiXqlJfWKm7qqhHKmLwSpiIYxq0kXZ81zbgqS9lU3hYrCoIDmPLsOQxc6_AlMDSy5FmWNgX6dtaEIAvji-A0Rc4lWjUE3u-wtrEOuW-HsdR9wNl3TYcS-2P6oLt8CB93JKuuCMd9k9P-2HSfXUryUJOKuI9o_Dci3MQbvdFCb1LN9R9cNwS5o_yNcf-14FHPUZoutPfSGIftzUYrVfAyU7RPLzpG-_XJhSLVJcSr_1vyCB5OL2bn-vx0fvYaHnVuMR-X8wYG2_UNviV0ta3exdvzE7zZHzw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bowel+preparation+before+colonoscopy+in+the+era+of+mass+screening+for+colo-rectal+cancer%3A+a+practical+approach&rft.jtitle=Digestive+and+liver+disease&rft.au=Parente%2C+F&rft.au=Marino%2C+B&rft.au=Crosta%2C+C&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.issn=1878-3562&rft.eissn=1878-3562&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.dld.2008.06.005&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F15908658%2FS1590865808X00143%2Fcov150h.gif