Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: A practical approach
Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand ov...
Saved in:
Published in | Digestive and liver disease Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 87 - 95 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1590-8658 1878-3562 1878-3562 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005 |
Cover
Abstract | Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes.
Standard PEG solutions and sodium phoshate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing.
Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phoshate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs. Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phosphate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs.Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phosphate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs. Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phosphate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs. Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the ongoing or planned colon cancer screening programs in many European countries we should expect an enormous increase in colonoscopic demand over the next few years. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy strictly depends upon the quality of bowel cleansing which is often perceived as the most unpleasant part of the procedure in individuals undergoing this examination. The ideal preparation for colonoscopy should reliably empty the colon from all faecal material allowing the optimal visualization of the entire colonic mucosa without causing great patient's discomfort nor significant shifts in fluids or electrolytes. Standard PEG solutions and sodium phoshate (NaP) compounds are the most frequently used preparations; both are accepted and relatively well tolerated by the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy; however, NaP compounds should be avoided in elderly subjects as well as in those with congestive heart failure, renal and hepatic insufficiency or taking diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, since they can induce severe electrolyte and/or fluid disturbances. Standard PEG solutions are often taken incompletely due to the low palatability and the high volume of liquids required which induce nausea and vomiting with negative consequences in terms of colon cleansing. Reduced volume and better palatability of PEG solutions, such as those obtained with the newest PEG formulations, as well as improved patient education concerning the importance of bowel cleansing could undoubtedly increase compliance with oral bowel preparations and promote adherence to colo-rectal cancer screening programs. |
Author | Parente, F. Crosta, C. Marino, B. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: F. surname: Parente fullname: Parente, F. email: f.parente@ospedale.lecco.it, fabrizio.parente@tiscalinet.it organization: Gastrointestinal Unit, A. Manzoni Hospital, 23900 Lecco, Italy – sequence: 2 givenname: B. surname: Marino fullname: Marino, B. organization: Gastrointestinal Unit, A. Manzoni Hospital, 23900 Lecco, Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: C. surname: Crosta fullname: Crosta, C. organization: Division of Endoscopy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18676211$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkk9v1DAQxS1URP_AB-CCfOKWMOMkXgckpFK1FKlSD8DZcpwJ9ZK1g50F7bfH6RYOldqebFnv90Z-b47ZgQ-eGHuNUCKgfLcu-7EvBYAqQZYAzTN2hGqliqqR4iDfmxYKJRt1yI5TWgMIlA28YIeo5EoKxCPmP4U_NPIp0mSimV3wvKMhROI2jMGHZMO0487z-YY4RcPDwDcmJZ5sJPLO_-BZfSsuItnZjNwabym-56fZ1djZ2fxmpikGY29esueDGRO9ujtP2PeL829nl8XV9ecvZ6dXhW2EmAsiqluDIFSHvYDWWgmm7waUxjQdmg6hAVs3AqthWHVtWw8dYF0rJbEiAdUJe7v3zWN_bSnNeuOSpXE0nsI2aSkVtJWUWfjmTrjtNtTrKbqNiTv9L6EsWO0FNoaUIg3auvk2qDkaN2oEvXSh1zp3oZcuNEidu8gk3iP_mz_CfNgzlMP57SjqZB3lPHu3pKv74B6lP96j7ej8UsBP2lFah230OXWNOgkN-uuyH8t6gMqrsf9s-7DBE8P_Ai9VyZ8 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_04786_y crossref_primary_10_1590_S0101_98802010000300016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2011_10_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12029_010_9190_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jct_2010_08_017 crossref_primary_10_3109_00365521003734158 crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v5_i9_433 crossref_primary_10_5946_ce_2017_155 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_016_5214_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2014_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2012_02_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_endomx_2016_10_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10151_014_1198_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2012_07_011 crossref_primary_10_17116_endoskop201521330_36 crossref_primary_10_1002_hsr2_2047 crossref_primary_10_61186_armaghanj_28_3_371 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiochem_2011_10_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2013_02_024 crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2012_441 crossref_primary_10_1097_SGA_0b013e3181ca05e4 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000000760 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmedr_2024_102636 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12030747 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2012_304292 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v20_i30_10620 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00384_015_2307_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2021_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2013_07_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2017_07_047 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v20_i37_13591 crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2022_2106154 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0b013e31828e389d crossref_primary_10_1007_s12664_021_01228_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_013_2598_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_SGA_0000000000000237 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v24_i26_2833 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10689_012_9517_7 crossref_primary_10_1097_SGA_0b013e318255b94a crossref_primary_10_23922_jarc_2023_030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2013_06_002 |
Cites_doi | 10.1055/s-2007-1018281 10.1016/0016-5085(83)90373-6 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00158-0 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03496.x 10.2165/00003495-200868040-00003 10.1007/BF02054117 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)00371-8 10.1007/BF02054413 10.3322/canjclin.51.1.38 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03677.x 10.1136/bmj.333.7568.589 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80008-2 10.1111/j.1742-1241.1996.tb10032.x 10.1080/00365520701843001 10.1016/S0016-5085(82)80390-9 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00970.x 10.1007/BF02554091 10.1055/s-2006-925259 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.011 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01259.x 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.051 10.1055/s-2003-41507 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.005 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.037 10.1067/mge.2003.294 10.1007/s11894-004-0056-8 10.1016/0016-5085(80)90781-7 10.1007/BF02258217 10.1016/S0016-5085(24)05135-7 10.1001/archinte.168.6.593 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03212.x 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02776-2 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70191-9 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70163-X 10.1053/gast.2003.50044 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01857-7 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x 10.1067/mge.2002.125361 10.1097/00001610-200405000-00004 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00635-2 10.1159/000018802 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1991.tb01387.x 10.2165/00002018-200427150-00006 10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.918 10.1136/gut.2003.016436 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02332.x 10.1681/ASN.2005050496 10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70213-8 10.1055/s-2003-38150 10.1136/bmj.39321.527384.BE 10.1007/BF02048160 10.1067/mge.2001.116562 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x 10.1007/BF02806525 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00007 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05827.x 10.1185/030079908X260844 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. – notice: Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1878-3562 |
EndPage | 95 |
ExternalDocumentID | 18676211 10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005 S1590865808002211 1_s2_0_S1590865808002211 |
Genre | Historical Article Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FD8 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OC. ON0 OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K Z5R ~G- AACTN AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-eee49a1028b1d209cc60adbf16aa5b1ab1050c45213ff7b994fb014488613e203 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 1590-8658 1878-3562 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 11:30:08 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:07:51 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:15:57 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:15:13 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:46 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 17:09:05 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | NaP compounds Stimulant laxatives Oral bowel preparations Colonoscopy PEG solution Colon cancer screening |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c522t-eee49a1028b1d209cc60adbf16aa5b1ab1050c45213ff7b994fb014488613e203 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 18676211 |
PQID | 66809366 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_66809366 pubmed_primary_18676211 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1590865808002211 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_dld_2008_06_005 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2009-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2009 text: 2009-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands |
PublicationTitle | Digestive and liver disease |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Dig Liver Dis |
PublicationYear | 2009 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Parente, Marino, Armellino, Redaelli, Invernizzi, Moretti (bib45) 2007; 56 Lieberman, Holub, Eisen, Kraemer, Morris (bib7) 2005; 62 Dominitz (bib41) 2006; 64 Padayatty, Levine (bib57) 2001; 164 Szojda, Kuik, Mulder, Felt-Bersma (bib24) 2008; 43 Ell, Fischbach, Bronisch, Dertinger, Layer, Runzi (bib58) 2008; 103 Froehlich, Wietlisbach, Gonvers, Burnand, Vader (bib9) 2005; 61 Clark, DiPalma (bib17) 2004; 27 Guller, Reichlin, Jost (bib31) 1996; 126 DiPalma, Brady, Stewart, Kerlin, McKinney, Clement (bib16) 1984; 86 Pignone, Saha, Hoerger, Mandelblatt (bib4) 2002; 137 Hsu, Imperiale (bib25) 1998; 48 Golub, Kerner, Wise (bib43) 1995; 58 Thomas, Brozisky, Isenberg (bib21) 1982; 82 Woo, Crail, Curry, Geddes (bib39) 2006; 333 Felt-Bersma, Kooyman, Kuipers (bib49) 2004; 148 Iida, Miura, Asada (bib64) 1992; 27 Rex, Chasen, Pochapin (bib32) 2002; 16 Rex, Bond, Feld (bib14) 2001; 96 Adams, Meagher, Lubowski, King (bib55) 1994; 27 Harewood, Sharma, de Garmo (bib8) 2003; 58 Cohen, Wexner, Binderow, Nogueras, Daniel, Ehrenpreis (bib47) 1994; 37 Markowitz, Stokes, Radhakrishnan, D’Agati (bib40) 2005; 16 Marshall, Pineda, Barthel, King (bib44) 1993; 39 Beck, Harford, DiPalma (bib15) 1985; 28 Chakravarty, Fraser, Hamilton, Lane (bib50) 1991; 21 Davis, Santa Ana, Morawski, Fordtran (bib20) 1980; 78 Hamilton, Mulcahy, Walsh, Farrelly, Tormey, Watson (bib62) 1996; 50 Ballinger, Anggiansah (bib5) 2007; 335 Khashab, Rex (bib34) 2005; 21 Winawer (bib2) 2003; 12 Berkelhammer, Ekambaram, Silva (bib30) 2002; 56 Tan, Tjandra (bib36) 2006; 8 Khurana, McLean, Atkinson, Foulks (bib37) 2008; 168 Smith, von Eschenbach, Wender, Levin, Byers, Rothenberger (bib3) 2001; 51 Unal, Dogan, Dumlu, Ozturk, Cindoruk (bib33) 1996; 7 Church (bib51) 1998; 41 Barthet, Ponchon, Coffin, Bitoun, Dugue, Halphen (bib59) 2004; 59 Worthington, Thyssen, Chapman, Chapman, Geraint (bib60) 2008; 24 Brown, DiPalma (bib19) 2004; 6 Ransohoff (bib1) 2005; 128 Belsey, Epstein, Heresbach (bib46) 2007; 25 Shawki, Wexner (bib23) 2008; 68 Linden, Waye (bib26) 1999; 50 Maa, Ng, Mui (bib38) 2003; 35 Martinek, Hess, Delarive, Jornod, Blum, Pantoflickova (bib53) 2001; 54 Aoun, Abdul-Baki, Azar, Mourad, Barada, Berro (bib56) 2005; 62 Ernstoff, Howard, Marshall, Jumshy, McCullough (bib22) 1983; 84 Bowles, Leicester, Romaya, Swarbrick, Williams, Epstein (bib11) 2004; 53 Reilly, Walker (bib18) 2004; 27 Afridi, Barthel, King, Pineda, Marshall (bib61) 1995; 41 Balaban, Leavell, Oblinger, Thompson, Bolton, Pambianco (bib28) 2003; 98 Rosch, Classen (bib52) 1987; 19 Lapalus, Gaudin, Lemkecher, Souquet, Wendehenne, Peltrault (bib27) 2001; 25 Yoshioka, Connolly, Ogunbiyi, Hasegawa, Morton, Keighley (bib63) 2000; 17 Radaelli, Meucci, Imperiali, Spinzi, Strocchi, Terruzzi (bib65) 2005; 100 Thomas-Gibson, Rogers, Cooper, Man, Rutter, Suzuki (bib10) 2006; 38 Seeff, Richards, Shapiro, Nadel, Manninen, Given (bib6) 2004; 127 Canard, Arpurt, Boustiere (bib12) 2006; 38 Ell, Fischbach, Keller, Dehe, Mayer, Schneider (bib48) 2003; 35 Rex, Imperiale, Latinovich, Bratcher (bib13) 2002; 97 Barclay (bib29) 2004; 60 Lichtestein, Grandhi, Schmalz, Lottes, Forbes, Walker (bib35) 2007; 26 Wexner, Beck, Baron, Fanelli, Hyman, Shan (bib54) 2006; 63 Rejchrt, Bures, Siroky, Kopacova, Slezak, Lengr (bib42) 2004; 59 Adams (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib55) 1994; 27 Lieberman (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib7) 2005; 62 Ell (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib58) 2008; 103 Balaban (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib28) 2003; 98 Beck (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib15) 1985; 28 Linden (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib26) 1999; 50 Pignone (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib4) 2002; 137 Golub (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib43) 1995; 58 Canard (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib12) 2006; 38 Ell (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib48) 2003; 35 Parente (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib45) 2007; 56 Winawer (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib2) 2003; 12 Martinek (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib53) 2001; 54 Tan (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib36) 2006; 8 Ernstoff (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib22) 1983; 84 Chakravarty (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib50) 1991; 21 Iida (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib64) 1992; 27 Barclay (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib29) 2004; 60 Maa (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib38) 2003; 35 Berkelhammer (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib30) 2002; 56 Radaelli (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib65) 2005; 100 Lichtestein (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib35) 2007; 26 Rex (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib13) 2002; 97 Thomas-Gibson (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib10) 2006; 38 Reilly (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib18) 2004; 27 Rex (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib14) 2001; 96 Rex (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib32) 2002; 16 Szojda (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib24) 2008; 43 Dominitz (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib41) 2006; 64 Harewood (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib8) 2003; 58 Froehlich (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib9) 2005; 61 Clark (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib17) 2004; 27 Guller (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib31) 1996; 126 Shawki (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib23) 2008; 68 Barthet (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib59) 2004; 59 Rejchrt (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib42) 2004; 59 Rosch (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib52) 1987; 19 Seeff (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib6) 2004; 127 Davis (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib20) 1980; 78 Markowitz (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib40) 2005; 16 Khashab (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib34) 2005; 21 Yoshioka (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib63) 2000; 17 Padayatty (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib57) 2001; 164 Felt-Bersma (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib49) 2004; 148 Bowles (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib11) 2004; 53 Hamilton (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib62) 1996; 50 Ballinger (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib5) 2007; 335 Ransohoff (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib1) 2005; 128 Khurana (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib37) 2008; 168 DiPalma (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib16) 1984; 86 Belsey (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib46) 2007; 25 Lapalus (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib27) 2001; 25 Unal (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib33) 1996; 7 Wexner (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib54) 2006; 63 Afridi (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib61) 1995; 41 Smith (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib3) 2001; 51 Brown (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib19) 2004; 6 Aoun (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib56) 2005; 62 Church (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib51) 1998; 41 Woo (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib39) 2006; 333 Marshall (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib44) 1993; 39 Hsu (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib25) 1998; 48 Worthington (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib60) 2008; 24 Cohen (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib47) 1994; 37 Thomas (10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib21) 1982; 82 |
References_xml | – volume: 98 start-page: 827 year: 2003 end-page: 832 ident: bib28 article-title: Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized,endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate vs. tablet sodium phosphate publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 41 start-page: 485 year: 1995 end-page: 489 ident: bib61 article-title: Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 58 start-page: 76 year: 2003 end-page: 79 ident: bib8 article-title: Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 164 start-page: 353 year: 2001 end-page: 355 ident: bib57 article-title: New insights into the physiology of vitamin C publication-title: Can Med Assoc J – volume: 12 start-page: 544 year: 2003 end-page: 560 ident: bib2 article-title: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—updated based on new evidence publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 38 start-page: 456 year: 2006 end-page: 460 ident: bib10 article-title: Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 35 start-page: 300 year: 2003 end-page: 304 ident: bib48 article-title: A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and the efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 63 start-page: 894 year: 2006 end-page: 909 ident: bib54 article-title: A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the Americal Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 62 start-page: 213 year: 2005 end-page: 218 ident: bib56 article-title: A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 127 start-page: 1670 year: 2004 end-page: 1677 ident: bib6 article-title: How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 126 start-page: 1352 year: 1996 end-page: 1357 ident: bib31 article-title: Colonic preparation with sodium phosphate. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study with various antiemetics publication-title: Schweiz Med Wochenschr – volume: 6 start-page: 395 year: 2004 end-page: 401 ident: bib19 article-title: Bowel preparation for gastrointestinal procedures publication-title: Curr Gastroenterol Rep – volume: 53 start-page: 277 year: 2004 end-page: 283 ident: bib11 article-title: A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? publication-title: Gut – volume: 27 start-page: 115 year: 2004 end-page: 117 ident: bib18 article-title: Reasons for poor colonic preparation for inpatients publication-title: Gastroenterol Nurs – volume: 97 start-page: 1687 year: 2002 end-page: 1690 ident: bib13 article-title: Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 39 start-page: 631 year: 1993 end-page: 634 ident: bib44 article-title: Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol electrlyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 43 start-page: 622 year: 2008 end-page: 626 ident: bib24 article-title: Colonic lavage with two polyethylene glycol solutions prior to colonoscopy makes no difference: a prospective randomized controlled trial publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol – volume: 59 start-page: 651 year: 2004 end-page: 654 ident: bib42 article-title: A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phophate fro colon cleansing before colonoscopy publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 24 start-page: 481 year: 2008 end-page: 488 ident: bib60 article-title: A randomised controlled trial of a new 2 publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin – volume: 50 start-page: 73 year: 1996 end-page: 75 ident: bib62 article-title: Sodium picosulfate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomized trial publication-title: Br J Clin Pract – volume: 16 start-page: 937 year: 2002 end-page: 944 ident: bib32 article-title: Safety and efficacy of two reduced dosing regimens of sodium phosphate tablets for preparation prior to colonoscopy publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 51 start-page: 38 year: 2001 end-page: 75 ident: bib3 article-title: American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update for early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin – volume: 27 start-page: 229 year: 1994 end-page: 233 ident: bib55 article-title: Bisacodyl reduces the volume of PEG solution required for bowel preparation publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum – volume: 103 start-page: 883 year: 2008 end-page: 893 ident: bib58 article-title: Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 56 start-page: 89 year: 2002 end-page: 94 ident: bib30 article-title: Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 8 start-page: 247 year: 2006 end-page: 258 ident: bib36 article-title: Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a meta-analysis publication-title: Colorectal Dis – volume: 35 start-page: 717 year: 2003 ident: bib38 article-title: Severe hyperphosphate and hypercalcemia following sodium phosphate bowel preparation: a forgotten menace publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 27 start-page: 1235 year: 2004 end-page: 1242 ident: bib17 article-title: Safety issues regarding colonic cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures publication-title: Drug Saf – volume: 7 start-page: 350 year: 1996 end-page: 354 ident: bib33 article-title: A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90-ml oral sodium phosphate with X-Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy publication-title: Turk J Gastroenterol – volume: 54 start-page: 180 year: 2001 end-page: 185 ident: bib53 article-title: Cisapride does not improve the precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 96 start-page: 952 year: 2001 end-page: 957 ident: bib14 article-title: Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopies publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 148 start-page: 181 year: 2004 end-page: 185 ident: bib49 article-title: Colonic lavage prior to colonoscopy: comparable outcomes of two polyethylene-glycol preparations and a sodium-phopshate solution publication-title: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd – volume: 78 start-page: 991 year: 1980 end-page: 995 ident: bib20 article-title: Development of a lavage solution with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 168 start-page: 593 year: 2008 end-page: 597 ident: bib37 article-title: The effect of oral sodium phosphate drug products on renal function in adults unddergoing bowel endoscopy publication-title: Arch Intern Med – volume: 58 start-page: 594 year: 1995 end-page: 597 ident: bib43 article-title: Colonoscopic preparations—which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum – volume: 128 start-page: 1685 year: 2005 end-page: 1695 ident: bib1 article-title: Colon cancer screening in 2005: status and challenges publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 38 start-page: A1467 year: 2006 ident: bib12 article-title: La coloscopie en France en 2004: resultat d’une enquete prospective nationale de la Societè Francaise d’Endoscopie Digestive publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 86 start-page: 856 year: 1984 end-page: 860 ident: bib16 article-title: Comparison of colon cleansing in preparation for colonoscopy publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 62 start-page: 875 year: 2005 end-page: 883 ident: bib7 article-title: Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 60 start-page: 527 year: 2004 end-page: 533 ident: bib29 article-title: Safety, efficacy, and patient tolerance of a three-dose regimen of orally administered aqueous sodium phosphate fro colonic cleansing before colonoscopy publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 333 start-page: 589 year: 2006 end-page: 590 ident: bib39 article-title: A life-threatening complication after ingestion of sodium phosphate bowel preparation publication-title: Br Med J – volume: 41 start-page: 1223 year: 1998 end-page: 1225 ident: bib51 article-title: Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy—timing is the key! publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum – volume: 100 start-page: 2674 year: 2005 end-page: 2680 ident: bib65 article-title: High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 48 start-page: 276 year: 1998 end-page: 282 ident: bib25 article-title: Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phopshate for colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 21 start-page: 465 year: 2005 end-page: 468 ident: bib34 article-title: Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phopshate tablets and a reduced sodium phosphate dose in colon cleansing: a single-center open-label pilot trial publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 19 start-page: 198 year: 1987 end-page: 200 ident: bib52 article-title: Fractional cleansing of the large bowel with Golytely for colonoscopic preparations: a controlled trial publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 335 start-page: 715 year: 2007 end-page: 718 ident: bib5 article-title: Colorectal cancer publication-title: Brit Med J – volume: 25 start-page: 373 year: 2007 end-page: 384 ident: bib46 article-title: Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 21 start-page: 769 year: 1991 end-page: 771 ident: bib50 article-title: A randomized blinded study in colonic lavage for colonoscopy publication-title: Aust NZ J Med – volume: 68 start-page: 417 year: 2008 end-page: 437 ident: bib23 article-title: Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults publication-title: Drugs – volume: 50 start-page: 811 year: 1999 end-page: 813 ident: bib26 article-title: Sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: onset and duration of bowel activity publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 17 start-page: 66 year: 2000 end-page: 70 ident: bib63 article-title: Randomized trial of oral sodium phopshate compared with oral sodium picosulfate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy publication-title: Dig Surg – volume: 82 start-page: 435 year: 1982 end-page: 437 ident: bib21 article-title: Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage soloution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 84 start-page: 435 year: 1983 end-page: 437 ident: bib22 article-title: A randomized blinded critical trail of a rapid colonic lavage solution compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 25 start-page: 29 year: 2001 end-page: 34 ident: bib27 article-title: Prospective randomized single-blind trial comparing oral sodium phopshate with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastroenterol Clin Biol – volume: 56 start-page: A25 year: 2007 ident: bib45 article-title: Mass screening of colorectal cancer with an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in Italy. Preliminary results in a pilot province publication-title: Gut – volume: 59 start-page: S1568 year: 2004 ident: bib59 article-title: A new 2 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 27 start-page: 728 year: 1992 end-page: 733 ident: bib64 article-title: Bowel preparation for the total colonoscopy by 2000 publication-title: Gastroenterol Jpn – volume: 26 start-page: 1361 year: 2007 end-page: 1370 ident: bib35 article-title: Clinical trial: sodium phosphate tablets are preferred and better tolerated by patients compared to polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 28 start-page: 491 year: 1985 end-page: 495 ident: bib15 article-title: Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum – volume: 37 start-page: 689 year: 1994 end-page: 696 ident: bib47 article-title: Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum – volume: 137 start-page: 96 year: 2002 end-page: 104 ident: bib4 article-title: Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 61 start-page: 378 year: 2005 end-page: 384 ident: bib9 article-title: Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 16 start-page: 3389 year: 2005 end-page: 3396 ident: bib40 article-title: Acute phopshate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underecognized cause of chronica renal failure publication-title: Am Soc Nephrol – volume: 64 start-page: 553 year: 2006 end-page: 555 ident: bib41 article-title: Take two phophosodas and scope them in the morning publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 19 start-page: 198 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib52 article-title: Fractional cleansing of the large bowel with Golytely for colonoscopic preparations: a controlled trial publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018281 – volume: 56 start-page: A25 issue: Suppl. 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib45 article-title: Mass screening of colorectal cancer with an immunochemical faecal occult blood test in Italy. Preliminary results in a pilot province publication-title: Gut – volume: 164 start-page: 353 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib57 article-title: New insights into the physiology of vitamin C publication-title: Can Med Assoc J – volume: 84 start-page: 435 year: 1983 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib22 article-title: A randomized blinded critical trail of a rapid colonic lavage solution compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(83)90373-6 – volume: 7 start-page: 350 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib33 article-title: A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90-ml oral sodium phosphate with X-Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy publication-title: Turk J Gastroenterol – volume: 59 start-page: 651 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib42 article-title: A prospective, observational study of colonic mucosal abnormalities associated with orally administered sodium phophate fro colon cleansing before colonoscopy publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00158-0 – volume: 26 start-page: 1361 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib35 article-title: Clinical trial: sodium phosphate tablets are preferred and better tolerated by patients compared to polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl tablets for bowel preparation publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03496.x – volume: 68 start-page: 417 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib23 article-title: Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults publication-title: Drugs doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868040-00003 – volume: 58 start-page: 594 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib43 article-title: Colonoscopic preparations—which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum doi: 10.1007/BF02054117 – volume: 100 start-page: 2674 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib65 article-title: High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00335.x – volume: 62 start-page: 213 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib56 article-title: A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)00371-8 – volume: 37 start-page: 689 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib47 article-title: Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum doi: 10.1007/BF02054413 – volume: 51 start-page: 38 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib3 article-title: American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update for early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/canjclin.51.1.38 – volume: 96 start-page: 952 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib14 article-title: Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopies publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03677.x – volume: 333 start-page: 589 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib39 article-title: A life-threatening complication after ingestion of sodium phosphate bowel preparation publication-title: Br Med J doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7568.589 – volume: 41 start-page: 485 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib61 article-title: Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)80008-2 – volume: 50 start-page: 73 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib62 article-title: Sodium picosulfate compared with polyethylene glycol solution for large bowel lavage: a prospective randomized trial publication-title: Br J Clin Pract doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.1996.tb10032.x – volume: 43 start-page: 622 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib24 article-title: Colonic lavage with two polyethylene glycol solutions prior to colonoscopy makes no difference: a prospective randomized controlled trial publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1080/00365520701843001 – volume: 82 start-page: 435 year: 1982 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib21 article-title: Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage soloution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(82)80390-9 – volume: 8 start-page: 247 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib36 article-title: Which is the optimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a meta-analysis publication-title: Colorectal Dis doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00970.x – volume: 28 start-page: 491 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib15 article-title: Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum doi: 10.1007/BF02554091 – volume: 38 start-page: 456 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib10 article-title: Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925259 – volume: 64 start-page: 553 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib41 article-title: Take two phophosodas and scope them in the morning publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.011 – volume: 16 start-page: 937 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib32 article-title: Safety and efficacy of two reduced dosing regimens of sodium phosphate tablets for preparation prior to colonoscopy publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01259.x – volume: 127 start-page: 1670 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib6 article-title: How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.051 – volume: 35 start-page: 717 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib38 article-title: Severe hyperphosphate and hypercalcemia following sodium phosphate bowel preparation: a forgotten menace publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41507 – volume: 128 start-page: 1685 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib1 article-title: Colon cancer screening in 2005: status and challenges publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.005 – volume: 62 start-page: 875 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib7 article-title: Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.037 – volume: 58 start-page: 76 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib8 article-title: Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.294 – volume: 6 start-page: 395 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib19 article-title: Bowel preparation for gastrointestinal procedures publication-title: Curr Gastroenterol Rep doi: 10.1007/s11894-004-0056-8 – volume: 78 start-page: 991 year: 1980 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib20 article-title: Development of a lavage solution with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(80)90781-7 – volume: 25 start-page: 29 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib27 article-title: Prospective randomized single-blind trial comparing oral sodium phopshate with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastroenterol Clin Biol – volume: 41 start-page: 1223 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib51 article-title: Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy—timing is the key! publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum doi: 10.1007/BF02258217 – volume: 86 start-page: 856 year: 1984 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib16 article-title: Comparison of colon cleansing in preparation for colonoscopy publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(24)05135-7 – volume: 38 start-page: A1467 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib12 article-title: La coloscopie en France en 2004: resultat d’une enquete prospective nationale de la Societè Francaise d’Endoscopie Digestive publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 168 start-page: 593 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib37 article-title: The effect of oral sodium phosphate drug products on renal function in adults unddergoing bowel endoscopy publication-title: Arch Intern Med doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.6.593 – volume: 25 start-page: 373 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib46 article-title: Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03212.x – volume: 126 start-page: 1352 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib31 article-title: Colonic preparation with sodium phosphate. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study with various antiemetics publication-title: Schweiz Med Wochenschr – volume: 61 start-page: 378 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib9 article-title: Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02776-2 – volume: 48 start-page: 276 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib25 article-title: Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phopshate for colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70191-9 – volume: 50 start-page: 811 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib26 article-title: Sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: onset and duration of bowel activity publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70163-X – volume: 12 start-page: 544 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib2 article-title: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—updated based on new evidence publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50044 – volume: 60 start-page: 527 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib29 article-title: Safety, efficacy, and patient tolerance of a three-dose regimen of orally administered aqueous sodium phosphate fro colonic cleansing before colonoscopy publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01857-7 – volume: 103 start-page: 883 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib58 article-title: Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG+electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x – volume: 148 start-page: 181 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib49 article-title: Colonic lavage prior to colonoscopy: comparable outcomes of two polyethylene-glycol preparations and a sodium-phopshate solution publication-title: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd – volume: 56 start-page: 89 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib30 article-title: Low-volume oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: sodium phosphate and magnesium citrate publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.125361 – volume: 27 start-page: 115 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib18 article-title: Reasons for poor colonic preparation for inpatients publication-title: Gastroenterol Nurs doi: 10.1097/00001610-200405000-00004 – volume: 59 start-page: S1568 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib59 article-title: A new 2l gut lavage solution: Results of a prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial comparing PEG+Ascorbic acid solution versus a sodium phosphate solution publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00635-2 – volume: 17 start-page: 66 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib63 article-title: Randomized trial of oral sodium phopshate compared with oral sodium picosulfate (Picolax) for elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy publication-title: Dig Surg doi: 10.1159/000018802 – volume: 21 start-page: 769 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib50 article-title: A randomized blinded study in colonic lavage for colonoscopy publication-title: Aust NZ J Med doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1991.tb01387.x – volume: 27 start-page: 1235 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib17 article-title: Safety issues regarding colonic cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures publication-title: Drug Saf doi: 10.2165/00002018-200427150-00006 – volume: 63 start-page: 894 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib54 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.918 – volume: 53 start-page: 277 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib11 article-title: A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.016436 – volume: 21 start-page: 465 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib34 article-title: Efficacy and tolerability of a new formulation of sodium phopshate tablets and a reduced sodium phosphate dose in colon cleansing: a single-center open-label pilot trial publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02332.x – volume: 16 start-page: 3389 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib40 article-title: Acute phopshate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underecognized cause of chronica renal failure publication-title: Am Soc Nephrol doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050496 – volume: 39 start-page: 631 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib44 article-title: Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol electrlyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70213-8 – volume: 35 start-page: 300 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib48 article-title: A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and the efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38150 – volume: 335 start-page: 715 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib5 article-title: Colorectal cancer publication-title: Brit Med J doi: 10.1136/bmj.39321.527384.BE – volume: 27 start-page: 229 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib55 article-title: Bisacodyl reduces the volume of PEG solution required for bowel preparation publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum doi: 10.1007/BF02048160 – volume: 54 start-page: 180 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib53 article-title: Cisapride does not improve the precolonoscopy bowel preparation with either sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.116562 – volume: 98 start-page: 827 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib28 article-title: Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized,endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate vs. tablet sodium phosphate publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x – volume: 27 start-page: 728 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib64 article-title: Bowel preparation for the total colonoscopy by 2000ml of balanced lavage solution (GoLytely) and sennoside publication-title: Gastroenterol Jpn doi: 10.1007/BF02806525 – volume: 137 start-page: 96 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib4 article-title: Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00007 – volume: 97 start-page: 1687 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib13 article-title: Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05827.x – volume: 24 start-page: 481 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005_bib60 article-title: A randomised controlled trial of a new 2l polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium picosulphate+magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin doi: 10.1185/030079908X260844 |
SSID | ssj0021650 |
Score | 2.0628252 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions; due to the... Abstract Colonoscopy constitutes the principal investigation for colo-rectal neoplasms due to its ability to detect and remove most of precancerous lesions;... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 87 |
SubjectTerms | Cathartics - administration & dosage Colon Colon cancer screening Colonoscopy Colonoscopy - history Colonoscopy - methods Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control Drug Therapy, Combination Early Detection of Cancer Gastroenterology and Hepatology History, 20th Century Humans Intestinal Mucosa - drug effects Laxatives - administration & dosage Mass Screening - methods NaP compounds Oral bowel preparations PEG solution Phosphates - administration & dosage Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage Preoperative Care - history Preoperative Care - methods Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Stimulant laxatives Surface-Active Agents - administration & dosage Therapeutic Irrigation - methods Treatment Outcome |
Title | Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: A practical approach |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1590865808002211 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1590865808002211 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2008.06.005 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18676211 https://www.proquest.com/docview/66809366 |
Volume | 41 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELWqIiEuCFo-lkLxAXFACmsnjjfhtlRUC6i9QKXeLNuZSFttndXuVlUv_HZmHGcRghaJSw7RWEns8cxz5s0MY288GsZCT5qsBm0zVYHM6sbneGmd8qW3MpLHT0717Ex9OS_Pd9jRkAtDtMpk-3ubHq11ujNOszlezufjb5LadaMDjZgnj_m9Sk1I19__2NI8cqljl1YSzkh6iGxGjlezaBKdkkIS5W2-6TbsGX3Q8SP2MIFHPu3f7zHbgbDH9qcBD86XN_wtj3TO-J98j90_SVHzfRY-dtew4MsV9IW-u8AdIFgFTiWrQ0eZKTd8HjiCQQ4ry7uWXyKo5mhS8JiLzo2jdBTOaLLwFTwpy-oDn_KUZoX3hvLkT9jZ8afvR7Ms9VnIPKKvTQYAqraENJxsclF7r4VtXCu1taWT1iEGE16hoy_aduLqWrWODmJVhVgAclE8ZbuhC_CccbCqFkWRtxVQL2uEj5WlCjhtVQoFXo-YGGbY-FSEnHphLMzANrswuCipOSYx7soRe7cdsuwrcNwlnA_LZobUUjSGBv3DXYMmfxsE67Sd10aadW6E-UPlRkxtR_6mtf964OtBowzuZgrR2ADd1dpoXYm60DhPz3pF-_XJlUa_JeWL_3vkAXvQx8GIiPOS7W5WV_AK4dTGHcb9csjuTT9_nZ3-BPVAHIU |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swED9KCttextbuI_uqHsYeBiaSLSv23rKykq5NXtZC34QsnyEjlUOSMvrf7yTLGWNrB3vxg9AhWzrd_c73BfDekmDM1LhOSlQmkQWKpKxtSo-mkja3RoTg8dlcTS_l16v8ag-O-1wYH1YZZX8n04O0jiOjuJuj1WIx-iZ8u25SoAHzpD6_d1_mZO0NYH9yejad7-wuoUKjVj8_8QS9czOEedXLOkZUeq9Efpd6ugt-BjV08gQeR_zIJt0rPoU9dAdwOHFkO1_fsg8sRHSGX-UH8GAWHeeH4D63P3DJVmvsan23jlVIeBWZr1rtWp-ccssWjhEeZLg2rG3YNeFqRlKFLF3Sb4xmh8mJ3y96Bev5Zf2JTVjMtKKxvkL5M7g8-XJxPE1iq4XEEgDbJogoS-PBRiXqlJfWKm7qqhHKmLwSpiIYxq0kXZ81zbgqS9lU3hYrCoIDmPLsOQxc6_AlMDSy5FmWNgX6dtaEIAvji-A0Rc4lWjUE3u-wtrEOuW-HsdR9wNl3TYcS-2P6oLt8CB93JKuuCMd9k9P-2HSfXUryUJOKuI9o_Dci3MQbvdFCb1LN9R9cNwS5o_yNcf-14FHPUZoutPfSGIftzUYrVfAyU7RPLzpG-_XJhSLVJcSr_1vyCB5OL2bn-vx0fvYaHnVuMR-X8wYG2_UNviV0ta3exdvzE7zZHzw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bowel+preparation+before+colonoscopy+in+the+era+of+mass+screening+for+colo-rectal+cancer%3A+a+practical+approach&rft.jtitle=Digestive+and+liver+disease&rft.au=Parente%2C+F&rft.au=Marino%2C+B&rft.au=Crosta%2C+C&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.issn=1878-3562&rft.eissn=1878-3562&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.dld.2008.06.005&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F15908658%2FS1590865808X00143%2Fcov150h.gif |