Food as a supplementary cue triggers seasonal changes in aggression, but not reproduction, in Siberian hamsters

• Published in: Physiology & behavior Vol. 167; pp. 298 - 308
• Main Authors: Bailey, Allison M, Rendon, Nikki M, O'Malley, Kyle J, Demas, Gregory E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2016
• Subjects: Aggression - physiology; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Body Mass Index; Cricetinae; Cues; Eating - physiology; Fasting; Female; Food; Food restriction; Gonadal regression; Male; Phenology; Phodopus; Photoperiod; Pregnancy; Psychiatry; Reproduction - physiology; Seasonality; Seasons; Sex Factors; Gonadal regression; Phenology; Food restriction; Seasonality
• DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.09.023
• ISSN: 0031-9384

Abstract Animals living in temperate regions prepare for harsh winter conditions by responding to environmental cues that signal resource availability (e.g., food, day length). Siberian hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus ) breed in long, summer-like days (LD, > 14 h light), i.e., photoperiods, and undergo robust gonadal regression and become more aggressive when exposed to short, winter-like photoperiods that signal impending limited resources (SD, < 10 h light). When hamsters are reared within an intermediate photoperiod (ID, 13.5 h light), they are reproductively active, but undergo gonadal regression in response to mild food restriction (FR) over 6–12 weeks. We hypothesized that short-term (1–2 weeks) FR in an ID photoperiod would provide a signal of impending limited resources and initiate the seasonal increase in aggression typical of SD photoperiods, as well as alter reproductive behaviors in advance of gonadal regression. To test this, we housed male and female hamsters in LD or ID photoperiods, with ad libitum (AL) access to food or a 90%-AL ration. We tested aggressive behavior after one week and reproductive behavior after two weeks, and subsequently monitored females for pregnancy and litter production. Both sexes displayed increased aggression in the ID-FR treatment. Untreated male intruders were less likely to ejaculate when paired with ID females during reproductive encounters. ID-FR males were undergoing gonadal regression after two weeks, but were more likely to have ejaculated. Female pregnancy and litter characteristics were unaltered by treatment: females were equally likely to achieve pregnancy and produce comparable litters across treatment groups. Collectively, we demonstrate that a signal of diminishing resources in an ID photoperiod is sufficient to trigger seasonal aggression, but that hamsters are reproductively resilient to inhibitory environmental cues in the short term. Broadly, our findings provide an important context for exploring seasonal changes in behavior and physiology from an ultimate perspective.