Facial rejuvenation via the sequential combined use of multiple laser modalities: Safety and efficacy

Background and Objectives Multi‐modal combination treatments for facial rejuvenation offer the potential to achieve superior results in a single treatment session. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining multiple laser modalities in a single treatment session. Methods Fifty p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLasers in surgery and medicine Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 577 - 583
Main Authors Wu, Douglas C., Fitzpatrick, Richard E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Objectives Multi‐modal combination treatments for facial rejuvenation offer the potential to achieve superior results in a single treatment session. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining multiple laser modalities in a single treatment session. Methods Fifty patients underwent a multi‐modal facial laser resurfacing procedure consisting of the sequential use of 595 nm pulsed dye laser, 755 nm alexandrite laser, superficial fractionated and fully ablative CO2 laser, superficial fully ablative erbium‐YAG laser, and deep fractionated ablative CO2 laser in a single treatment session. Improvements in dyspigmentation, rhytides, telangiectasia, and skin texture were assessed. Patient satisfaction, healing times, and tolerability of procedure was also evaluated. Results Highly significant improvements in all clinical parameters were demonstrated at both short‐ and long‐term follow‐up evaluations. Patients reported a high satisfaction rate. Conclusion Mega‐combination treatment utilizing a variety of laser devices in a single treatment session is safe and highly effective at achieving facial rejuvenation. This approach represents an efficient use of both patient and physician time and resources. Lasers Surg. Med. 48:577–583, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:C323AEEC5943850F6792CB347BAC962B40C8E16F
ArticleID:LSM22514
ark:/67375/WNG-M2SVM6TN-9
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.22514