Root Canal Morphology and Configuration of 118 Mandibular First Molars by Means of Micro–Computed Tomography: An Ex Vivo Study

• Published in: Journal of endodontics Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 610 - 614
• Main Authors: Wolf, Thomas Gerhard, DDS, PhD, Paqué, Frank, DDS, PhD, Zeller, Maximilian, DDS, Willershausen, Brita, DDS, PhD, Briseño-Marroquín, Benjamín, DDS, MDS, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2016
• Subjects: Dental Pulp Cavity - anatomy & histology; Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging; Dentistry; Endocrinology & Metabolism; Female; Humans; Internal tooth morphology; Male; Mandible - anatomy & histology; Mandible - diagnostic imaging; mandibular first molar; micro-computed tomography; Molar - anatomy & histology; Molar - diagnostic imaging; root canal configuration; Tooth Crown - anatomy & histology; Tooth Crown - diagnostic imaging; Tooth Root - anatomy & histology; Tooth Root - diagnostic imaging; X-Ray Microtomography - methods; root canal configuration; micro-computed tomography; mandibular first molar; Internal tooth morphology
• DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.004
• ISSN: 0099-2399

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate the root canal system morphology of the mandibular first molar by means of micro–computed tomography. Methods The root canal configuration, foramina, and accessory canals frequency of 118 mandibular first molars were investigated by means of micro–computed tomography and 3-dimensional software imaging. A 4-digit system describes the root canal configuration from the coronal to apical thirds and the main foramina number. Results The most frequent root canal configurations in mesial root were 2-2-2/2 (31.4%), 2-2-1/1 (15.3%), and 2-2-2/3 (11.9%); another 24 different root canal configurations were observed in this root. A 1-1-1/1 (58.5%), 1-1-1/2 (10.2%), and 16 other root canal configurations were observed in the distal root. The mesiobuccal root canal showed 1–4 foramina in 24.6%, and the mesiolingual showed 1–3 foramina in 28.0%. One connecting canal between the mesial root canals was observed in 30.5% and 2 in 3.4%. The distolingual root canal showed 1–4 foramina in 23.7%, whereas a foramen in the distobuccal root canal was rarely detected (3.4%). The mesiobuccal, mesiolingual, and distolingual root canals showed at least 1 accessory canal (14.3, 10.2, and 4.2%, respectively), but the distobuccal had none. Conclusions The root canal configuration of mandibular first molars varies strongly. According to our expectations, both the mesial and distal roots showed a high number of morphologic diversifications. The root canal system of the mesial root showed more root canal configuration variations, connecting and accessory canals than the distal root.