Neural basis of lower-limb visual feedback therapy: an EEG study in healthy subjects

Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 114 - 16
Main Authors Adham, Ahmed, Le, Ba Thien, Bonnal, Julien, Bessaguet, Hugo, Ojardias, Etienne, Giraux, Pascal, Auzou, Pascal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 08.07.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647.
AbstractList Abstract Background Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. Methods We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). Results During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Conclusion Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647
Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation.
Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution.BACKGROUNDVideo-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution.We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV).METHODSWe recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV).During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM.RESULTSDuring the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM.Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647.CONCLUSIONAlpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647.
Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647.
Background Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. Methods We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). Results During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Conclusion Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647 Keywords: Video feedback therapy, Lower limb, EEG, Rehabilitation, Mirror neuron system
ArticleNumber 114
Audience Academic
Author Le, Ba Thien
Giraux, Pascal
Auzou, Pascal
Bonnal, Julien
Adham, Ahmed
Ojardias, Etienne
Bessaguet, Hugo
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ahmed
  surname: Adham
  fullname: Adham, Ahmed
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ba Thien
  surname: Le
  fullname: Le, Ba Thien
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Julien
  surname: Bonnal
  fullname: Bonnal, Julien
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Hugo
  surname: Bessaguet
  fullname: Bessaguet, Hugo
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Etienne
  surname: Ojardias
  fullname: Ojardias, Etienne
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Pascal
  surname: Giraux
  fullname: Giraux, Pascal
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Pascal
  surname: Auzou
  fullname: Auzou, Pascal
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38978051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://hal.science/hal-04948533$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNptkk1v1DAQhiNURD_gD3BAlrjAIcVfcWwuaFUtbaUVXMrZ8sdk10s2LnGyaP89TlOqLkKW5dH4mXc81ntenHSxg6J4S_AlIVJ8SoQqyUtM8yYcy1K-KM5IzVmJMWYnz-LT4jylbQ44rvir4pRJVUtckbPi7huMvWmRNSkkFBvUxt_Ql23YWbQPacxXDYC3xv1EwwZ6c3_4jEyHlstrlIbRH1Do0AZMO2wOKI12C25Ir4uXjWkTvHk8L4ofX5d3Vzfl6vv17dViVbqKkqFUElvjPfa8EV5gpygBaniFHVdceQW2Ib62FRe2ASMbBUJwwyqHa8W4weyiuJ11fTRbfd-HnekPOpqgHxKxX2vTD8G1oEFwqCyuCbGOY-uVUVZxRjytvRNYZK0vs9b9aHfgHXRD_pcj0eObLmz0Ou41IZQqyieFj7PC5p-6m8VKTzmcx5IVY3uS2Q-P3fr4a4Q06F1IDtrWdBDHpBmua1ILoib0_YyuTZ4jdE3M7d2E64XEWFBeian55X-ovDzsgsu-aULOHxW8ez7v04P_WiMDdAZcH1PqoXlCCNaT__TsP539px_8pyX7A__KypA
Cites_doi 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008
10.1371/journal.pone.0033882
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.018
10.1186/s12883-019-1533-x
10.3390/brainsci11101284
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.008
10.1016/j.brainres.2018.09.003
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1007-16.2016
10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.005
10.1037/bul0000031
10.3389/fnhum.2021.629592
10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.033
10.1038/s41598-018-30912-w
10.1177/0269215512455651
10.3389/fnins.2017.00601
10.1016/j.neures.2017.10.002
10.7554/eLife.48065
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1090-15.2015
10.1590/1806-9282.63.11.1000
10.1177/1545968319836207
10.1016/j.brainres.2015.09.037
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.024
10.3233/NRE-210307
10.3389/fnins.2021.682113
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.09.017
10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00920-4
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.022
10.1097/00001756-200112040-00051
10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.010
10.12659/MSM.898157
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.09.013
10.1136/jnnp.2009.194134
10.1152/jn.00686.2014
10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.034
10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.029
10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.004
10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2919194
10.1007/s11682-016-9536-3
10.1177/0269215518766642
10.1007/s00221-012-3276-4
10.3389/fnsys.2020.00063
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0784-13.2013
10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
10.1177/1545968311427917
10.1038/s41598-019-55369-3
10.3390/vision7040075
10.1098/rsos.160662
10.1007/s00429-017-1387-1
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
10.1007/s10072-023-06982-8
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.048
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.053
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.05.017
10.1080/10749357.2016.1141472
10.1152/jn.00771.2016
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
Attribution - NonCommercial
The Author(s) 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Attribution - NonCommercial
– notice: The Author(s) 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12984-024-01408-8
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Open Access Full Text
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
EISSN 1743-0003
EndPage 16
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606
PMC11229246
oai_HAL_hal_04948533v1
A800624566
38978051
10_1186_s12984_024_01408_8
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations France
GeographicLocations_xml – name: France
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29L
2QV
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
7RV
7X7
88E
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
AQUVI
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
I-F
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPY
ITC
KQ8
L6V
LK8
M0T
M1P
M48
M7P
M7S
ML0
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PMFND
7X8
PUEGO
1XC
VOOES
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-980badd0d4f6d60c921e2a450c4949d9ebf1d7b546bfea8f9e664a35c07934a03
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1743-0003
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:03:37 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:32:19 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 06:31:04 EDT 2025
Sun Aug 24 03:39:24 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:09:16 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:08:48 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:50:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:20:02 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Lower limb
Rehabilitation
Mirror neuron system
EEG
Video feedback therapy
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Attribution - NonCommercial: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c521t-980badd0d4f6d60c921e2a450c4949d9ebf1d7b546bfea8f9e664a35c07934a03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-8581-1472
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606
PMID 38978051
PQID 3077176191
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11229246
hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04948533v1
proquest_miscellaneous_3077176191
gale_infotracmisc_A800624566
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A800624566
pubmed_primary_38978051
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_024_01408_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-07-08
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-07-08
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-07-08
  day: 08
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neuroeng Rehabil
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References DP Allen (1408_CR32) 2010; 186
I Kancheva (1408_CR57) 2023; 44
M Tani (1408_CR12) 2018; 133
A Stolk (1408_CR23) 2019; 8
G Bartur (1408_CR10) 2015; 1606
WD Byblow (1408_CR60) 2012; 7
F Hamzei (1408_CR14) 2012; 26
R Gatti (1408_CR39) 2017; 11
T In (1408_CR8) 2016; 28
SG Thorpe (1408_CR42) 2016; 127
T Zult (1408_CR13) 2015; 113
M Muthuraman (1408_CR61) 2012; 223
T Koelewijn (1408_CR25) 2008; 40
N Mizuguchi (1408_CR20) 2017; 234
M Zhao (1408_CR38) 2019; 9
H Nagai (1408_CR19) 2019; 27
A Mary (1408_CR50) 2015; 104
S Mathôt (1408_CR28) 2012; 44
L Dong (1408_CR29) 2017; 30
E Maris (1408_CR36) 2007; 164
L Casartelli (1408_CR55) 2017; 117
PG Wittkopf (1408_CR7) 2017; 63
Y Li (1408_CR4) 2018; 32
A Delorme (1408_CR30) 2004; 134
CT Shiner (1408_CR24) 2015; 1629
HM Hobson (1408_CR41) 2017; 4
F Torrecillos (1408_CR52) 2015; 35
G Pfurtscheller (1408_CR33) 1999; 110
H Thieme (1408_CR6) 2013; 27
P Giraux (1408_CR58) 2003; 20
ME Michielsen (1408_CR16) 2011; 82
P Cardellicchio (1408_CR26) 2020; 2
W Park (1408_CR22) 2021; 11
MT Jurkiewicz (1408_CR49) 2006; 32
E Heinrichs-Graham (1408_CR56) 2017; 222
RY Tai (1408_CR15) 2021; 11
JJ Gonzalez-Rosa (1408_CR37) 2015; 281
DR Louie (1408_CR3) 2019; 28
L Ding (1408_CR18) 2019; 33
NH Bhanpuri (1408_CR54) 2013; 33
RM Hardwick (1408_CR46) 2018; 94
S Aydore (1408_CR35) 2013; 74
MX Cohen (1408_CR31) 2019; 199
R Debnath (1408_CR40) 2019; 184
MX Cohen (1408_CR34) 2015; 97
B Buchignani (1408_CR9) 2019; 19
M Angelini (1408_CR45) 2018; 8
G Pfurtscheller (1408_CR48) 2005; 378
RC Oldfield (1408_CR27) 1971; 9
L Cao (1408_CR53) 2016; 36
KNK Fong (1408_CR47) 2021; 15
S McCombe Waller (1408_CR59) 2008; 269
P Broderick (1408_CR5) 2018; 63
EL Altschuler (1408_CR2) 1999; 353
Y Sun (1408_CR44) 2016; 23
H Kim (1408_CR1) 2023; 7
G Bartur (1408_CR11) 2018; 1700
JJQ Zhang (1408_CR43) 2018; 2018
W Cui (1408_CR17) 2022; 51
NA Fox (1408_CR21) 2016; 142
F Cassim (1408_CR51) 2001; 12
References_xml – volume: 234
  start-page: 189
  year: 2017
  ident: 1408_CR20
  publication-title: Prog Brain Res
  doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008
– volume: 7
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: 1408_CR60
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033882
– volume: 40
  start-page: 767
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: 1408_CR25
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.018
– volume: 19
  start-page: 344
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1408_CR9
  publication-title: BMC Neurol
  doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1533-x
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1284
  issue: 10
  year: 2021
  ident: 1408_CR15
  publication-title: Brain Sci
  doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101284
– volume: 74
  start-page: 231
  year: 2013
  ident: 1408_CR35
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.008
– volume: 1700
  start-page: 170
  year: 2018
  ident: 1408_CR11
  publication-title: Brain Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.09.003
– volume: 36
  start-page: 6365
  issue: 24
  year: 2016
  ident: 1408_CR53
  publication-title: J Neurosci
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1007-16.2016
– volume: 44
  start-page: 314
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 1408_CR28
  publication-title: Behav Res Methods
  doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
– volume: 110
  start-page: 1842
  issue: 11
  year: 1999
  ident: 1408_CR33
  publication-title: Clin Neurophysiol
  doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1281
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  ident: 1408_CR49
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.005
– volume: 142
  start-page: 291
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 1408_CR21
  publication-title: Psychol Bull
  doi: 10.1037/bul0000031
– volume: 15
  year: 2021
  ident: 1408_CR47
  publication-title: Front Hum Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.629592
– volume: 269
  start-page: 96
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2008
  ident: 1408_CR59
  publication-title: J Neurol Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.033
– volume: 8
  start-page: 12429
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 1408_CR45
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30912-w
– volume: 27
  start-page: 314
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 1408_CR6
  publication-title: Clin Rehabil
  doi: 10.1177/0269215512455651
– volume: 30
  start-page: 601
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  ident: 1408_CR29
  publication-title: Front Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00601
– volume: 133
  start-page: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: 1408_CR12
  publication-title: Neurosci Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.10.002
– volume: 8
  start-page: e48065
  year: 2019
  ident: 1408_CR23
  publication-title: Elife
  doi: 10.7554/eLife.48065
– volume: 94
  start-page: 31
  year: 2018
  ident: 1408_CR46
  publication-title: Neurosci Biobehav Rev
  doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003
– volume: 35
  start-page: 12753
  issue: 37
  year: 2015
  ident: 1408_CR52
  publication-title: J Neurosci
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1090-15.2015
– volume: 63
  start-page: 1000
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  ident: 1408_CR7
  publication-title: Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)
  doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.63.11.1000
– volume: 33
  start-page: 307
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  ident: 1408_CR18
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968319836207
– volume: 1629
  start-page: 26
  year: 2015
  ident: 1408_CR24
  publication-title: Brain Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.09.037
– volume: 20
  start-page: S107
  year: 2003
  ident: 1408_CR58
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.024
– volume: 51
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 1408_CR17
  publication-title: NeuroRehabilitation
  doi: 10.3233/NRE-210307
– volume: 11
  issue: 15
  year: 2021
  ident: 1408_CR22
  publication-title: Front Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.682113
– volume: 28
  start-page: 107
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1408_CR3
  publication-title: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.09.017
– volume: 353
  start-page: 2035
  issue: 9169
  year: 1999
  ident: 1408_CR2
  publication-title: The Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00920-4
– volume: 186
  start-page: 107
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 1408_CR32
  publication-title: J Neurosci Methods
  doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.022
– volume: 12
  start-page: 3859
  issue: 17
  year: 2001
  ident: 1408_CR51
  publication-title: NeuroReport
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-200112040-00051
– volume: 281
  start-page: 290
  year: 2015
  ident: 1408_CR37
  publication-title: Behav Brain Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016
– volume: 104
  start-page: 59
  year: 2015
  ident: 1408_CR50
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.010
– volume: 28
  start-page: 4046
  issue: 22
  year: 2016
  ident: 1408_CR8
  publication-title: Med Sci Monit
  doi: 10.12659/MSM.898157
– volume: 97
  start-page: 245
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 1408_CR34
  publication-title: Int J Psychophysiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.09.013
– volume: 82
  start-page: 393
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 1408_CR16
  publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.194134
– volume: 113
  start-page: 2262
  issue: 7
  year: 2015
  ident: 1408_CR13
  publication-title: J Neurophysiol
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00686.2014
– volume: 378
  start-page: 156
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 1408_CR48
  publication-title: Neurosci Lett
  doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.034
– volume: 1606
  start-page: 113
  year: 2015
  ident: 1408_CR10
  publication-title: Brain Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.029
– volume: 127
  start-page: 254
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 1408_CR42
  publication-title: Clin Neurophysiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.004
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1407
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 1408_CR19
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2919194
– volume: 11
  start-page: 565
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 1408_CR39
  publication-title: Brain Imaging Behav
  doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9536-3
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1007
  issue: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 1408_CR4
  publication-title: Clin Rehabil
  doi: 10.1177/0269215518766642
– volume: 223
  start-page: 489
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 1408_CR61
  publication-title: Exp Brain Res
  doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3276-4
– volume: 2
  start-page: 63
  issue: 14
  year: 2020
  ident: 1408_CR26
  publication-title: Front Syst Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00063
– volume: 33
  start-page: 14301
  issue: 36
  year: 2013
  ident: 1408_CR54
  publication-title: J Neurosci
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0784-13.2013
– volume: 9
  start-page: 97
  issue: 1
  year: 1971
  ident: 1408_CR27
  publication-title: Neuropsychologia
  doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
– volume: 164
  start-page: 177
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: 1408_CR36
  publication-title: J Neurosci Methods
  doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
– volume: 26
  start-page: 484
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 1408_CR14
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968311427917
– volume: 9
  start-page: 19464
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1408_CR38
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55369-3
– volume: 7
  start-page: 75
  issue: 4
  year: 2023
  ident: 1408_CR1
  publication-title: Vision
  doi: 10.3390/vision7040075
– volume: 4
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 1408_CR41
  publication-title: Royal Soc Open Sci
  doi: 10.1098/rsos.160662
– volume: 222
  start-page: 3075
  issue: 7
  year: 2017
  ident: 1408_CR56
  publication-title: Brain Struct Funct
  doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1387-1
– volume: 134
  start-page: 9
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 1408_CR30
  publication-title: J Neurosci Methods
  doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
– volume: 44
  start-page: 4263
  issue: 12
  year: 2023
  ident: 1408_CR57
  publication-title: Neurol Sci
  doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06982-8
– volume: 199
  start-page: 81
  year: 2019
  ident: 1408_CR31
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.048
– volume: 184
  start-page: 496
  year: 2019
  ident: 1408_CR40
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.053
– volume: 63
  start-page: 208
  year: 2018
  ident: 1408_CR5
  publication-title: Gait Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.05.017
– volume: 2018
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 1408_CR43
  publication-title: Neural Plast
– volume: 23
  start-page: 245
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  ident: 1408_CR44
  publication-title: Top Stroke Rehabil
  doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1141472
– volume: 117
  start-page: 1474
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 1408_CR55
  publication-title: J Neurophysiol
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00771.2016
SSID ssj0034054
Score 2.3757374
Snippet Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for...
Background Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown...
Abstract Background Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
hal
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 114
SubjectTerms Adult
Alpha Rhythm - physiology
Biofeedback training
Care and treatment
EEG
Electroencephalography
Extremities, Lower
Feedback, Sensory - physiology
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Imagination - physiology
Leg
Life Sciences
Lower Extremity - physiology
Lower limb
Male
Methods
Mirror neuron system
Neurons and Cognition
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Rehabilitation
Video feedback therapy
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Zj9MwELZ2FwnBA0e5CgsyiONhZXASx3GQECqoS4UoQqiV9s3yyUaUFJrtiv57xjmqBvaRV3tyyDPj-SbxfIPQU5uKzBufEU-znDCeKKKpEsTbRKUmNdTyUJw8_cwnc_bxJD3ZQ127o3YBqwtTu9BPar5avPz9a_MWHP5N7fCCv6ogZglGINqQkC8IIvbRJYhMWXDUKdv-VUgAnLCucObC63rBqebw3-7U-6fhoOS_KPTvw5Q70en4BrrWwko8auzgJtpz5QBd3SEbHKDL0_Y3-gA92-UWxrOGWAA_x197tN0DdP1Lq8VO5haaBTYPGIDoV1R46fEitFkji-KHxudFtYYpDwFRK_MdN7Vdm9dYlXg8_oBrKltclLgpvtzgaq3DZ6DqNpofj2fvJ6TtzEBMaIBAckE1bIzUMs8tpyaPIxcrllITyG5s7rSPbKZTxrV3Svjccc5UAqqH7YApmtxBB-WydPcQDr0_YmpM5K2GXFPrVMexSnITC29Sx4boqFOJ_NkQcMg6cRFcNgqUoEBZK1CKIXoXtLaVDOTZ9cBy9U22vigdZy7VgK0ibRjVNle5zgFI2TizBhK6IXoRdC6D0YFKjWorFeCFA1mWHIlQeQrIEyQPe5LgmqY3_QSspvcyk9EnGcYaWp4kOY-G6HFnVDJcHw69lW65riRsv5BsQ4YLMncbI9veC3Bm6EYBM6Jnfr2H9WfK4rSmDweEHUPWze__j7V6gK7EtQNlhIpDdHC2WruHANPO9KPa9_4AeVI5ng
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Neural basis of lower-limb visual feedback therapy: an EEG study in healthy subjects
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38978051
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3077176191
https://hal.science/hal-04948533
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11229246
https://doaj.org/article/e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELfYkBA88FG-CqMyiI-HyZqbOI7DW4faVRWdptFJfbP8qUWMFJF10v57znFaNfDACy-pZF9SK3fn313r-x1C720mcm98TjzNC8J4qoimShBvU5WZzFDLQ3Hy_JRPL9hsmS13Wn2FM2GRHji-uCPHmcs0AOFQG0a1LVShC0A9m-TW8Ei2DZi3SabiHpxCGMI2JTKCH9WAaoIRwCMSMgpBRAeGGrb-7Z68dxmORP4db_55bHIHhyaP0cM2gMSjuPAn6I6reujBDq1gD92bt3-Y99CHXRZhvIgUAvgjPu8QdPfQo7NWXxuZp2gReDtgAHCurPHK46vQUI1clT80vinrNUx5gD6tzHccq7huP2NV4fH4BDektbiscCyzvMX1WocffOpn6GIyXnyZkrYHAzGh1QEpBNWwBVLLPLecmiIZukSxjJpAa2MLp_3Q5jpjXHunhC8c50yloGRwfKZo-hztV6vKvUQ4dPlIqDFDbzVklVpnOklUWphEeJM51keHG5XIn5FqQzYpiuAyKlCCAmWjQCn66DhobSsZaLKbATAe2RqP_Jfx9NGnoHMZnBlUalRbkwALDrRYciRCjSnEmCB50JEEJzSd6XdgNZ3FTEdfZRiLBDxpejPso7cbo5Lh_nC8rXKrdS1ho4W0GnJZkHkRjWz7LIgoQ98JmBEd8-t8WXemKi8bonCIpRPIr_mr__GuXqP7SeNAOaHiAO1f_1q7NxCQXesB2suXOVzF5GSA7o5Gs28z-Dwen56dDxq_hOucid9v8Te8
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural+basis+of+lower-limb+visual+feedback+therapy%3A+an+EEG+study+in+healthy+subjects&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroengineering+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Ahmed+Adham&rft.au=Ba+Thien+Le&rft.au=Julien+Bonnal&rft.au=Hugo+Bessaguet&rft.date=2024-07-08&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12984-024-01408-8&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon