Neural basis of lower-limb visual feedback therapy: an EEG study in healthy subjects
Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the u...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 114 - 16 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
08.07.2024
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution.
We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV).
During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM.
Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Background Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. Methods We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). Results During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Conclusion Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647 Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution.BACKGROUNDVideo-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution.We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV).METHODSWe recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV).During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM.RESULTSDuring the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM.Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647.CONCLUSIONAlpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647. Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647. Background Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs. Despite an increase in recent literature on the neurophysiological effects of VOT in the upper limb, there is little knowledge about the cortical effects of visual feedback therapies when applied to the lower limbs. The aim of our study was to better understand the neurophysiological effects of VOT. Thus, we identified and compared the EEG biomarkers of healthy subjects undergoing lower limb VOT during three tasks: passive observation, observation and motor imagery, observation and motor execution. Methods We recruited 38 healthy volunteers and monitored their EEG activity while they performed a right ankle dorsiflexion task in the VOT. Three graded motor tasks associated with action observation were tested: action observation alone (O), motor imagery with action observation (OI), and motor execution synchronized with action observation (OM). The alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (or beta rebound, ERS) rhythms were used as biomarkers of cortical activation and compared between conditions with a permutation test. Changes in connectivity during the task were computed with phase locking value (PLV). Results During the task, in the alpha band, the ERD was comparable between O and OI activities across the precentral, central and parietal electrodes. OM involved the same regions but had greater ERD over the central electrodes. In the beta band, there was a gradation of ERD intensity in O, OI and OM over central electrodes. After the task, the ERS changes were weak during the O task but were strong during the OI and OM (Cz) tasks, with no differences between OI and OM. Conclusion Alpha band ERD results demonstrated the recruitment of mirror neurons during lower limb VOT due to visual feedback. Beta band ERD reflects strong recruitment of the sensorimotor cortex evoked by motor imagery and action execution. These results also emphasize the need for an active motor task, either motor imagery or motor execution task during VOT, to elicit a post-task ERS, which is absent during passive observation. Trial Registration NCT05743647 Keywords: Video feedback therapy, Lower limb, EEG, Rehabilitation, Mirror neuron system |
ArticleNumber | 114 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Le, Ba Thien Giraux, Pascal Auzou, Pascal Bonnal, Julien Adham, Ahmed Ojardias, Etienne Bessaguet, Hugo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ahmed surname: Adham fullname: Adham, Ahmed – sequence: 2 givenname: Ba Thien surname: Le fullname: Le, Ba Thien – sequence: 3 givenname: Julien surname: Bonnal fullname: Bonnal, Julien – sequence: 4 givenname: Hugo surname: Bessaguet fullname: Bessaguet, Hugo – sequence: 5 givenname: Etienne surname: Ojardias fullname: Ojardias, Etienne – sequence: 6 givenname: Pascal surname: Giraux fullname: Giraux, Pascal – sequence: 7 givenname: Pascal surname: Auzou fullname: Auzou, Pascal |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38978051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.science/hal-04948533$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNptkk1v1DAQhiNURD_gD3BAlrjAIcVfcWwuaFUtbaUVXMrZ8sdk10s2LnGyaP89TlOqLkKW5dH4mXc81ntenHSxg6J4S_AlIVJ8SoQqyUtM8yYcy1K-KM5IzVmJMWYnz-LT4jylbQ44rvir4pRJVUtckbPi7huMvWmRNSkkFBvUxt_Ql23YWbQPacxXDYC3xv1EwwZ6c3_4jEyHlstrlIbRH1Do0AZMO2wOKI12C25Ir4uXjWkTvHk8L4ofX5d3Vzfl6vv17dViVbqKkqFUElvjPfa8EV5gpygBaniFHVdceQW2Ib62FRe2ASMbBUJwwyqHa8W4weyiuJ11fTRbfd-HnekPOpqgHxKxX2vTD8G1oEFwqCyuCbGOY-uVUVZxRjytvRNYZK0vs9b9aHfgHXRD_pcj0eObLmz0Ou41IZQqyieFj7PC5p-6m8VKTzmcx5IVY3uS2Q-P3fr4a4Q06F1IDtrWdBDHpBmua1ILoib0_YyuTZ4jdE3M7d2E64XEWFBeian55X-ovDzsgsu-aULOHxW8ez7v04P_WiMDdAZcH1PqoXlCCNaT__TsP539px_8pyX7A__KypA |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008 10.1371/journal.pone.0033882 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.018 10.1186/s12883-019-1533-x 10.3390/brainsci11101284 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.008 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.09.003 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1007-16.2016 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.005 10.1037/bul0000031 10.3389/fnhum.2021.629592 10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.033 10.1038/s41598-018-30912-w 10.1177/0269215512455651 10.3389/fnins.2017.00601 10.1016/j.neures.2017.10.002 10.7554/eLife.48065 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1090-15.2015 10.1590/1806-9282.63.11.1000 10.1177/1545968319836207 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.09.037 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.024 10.3233/NRE-210307 10.3389/fnins.2021.682113 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.09.017 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00920-4 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.022 10.1097/00001756-200112040-00051 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.010 10.12659/MSM.898157 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.09.013 10.1136/jnnp.2009.194134 10.1152/jn.00686.2014 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.034 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.029 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.004 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2919194 10.1007/s11682-016-9536-3 10.1177/0269215518766642 10.1007/s00221-012-3276-4 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00063 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0784-13.2013 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 10.1177/1545968311427917 10.1038/s41598-019-55369-3 10.3390/vision7040075 10.1098/rsos.160662 10.1007/s00429-017-1387-1 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 10.1007/s10072-023-06982-8 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.048 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.053 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.05.017 10.1080/10749357.2016.1141472 10.1152/jn.00771.2016 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. Attribution - NonCommercial The Author(s) 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Attribution - NonCommercial – notice: The Author(s) 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12984-024-01408-8 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Open Access Full Text |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Engineering Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation Physical Therapy |
EISSN | 1743-0003 |
EndPage | 16 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606 PMC11229246 oai_HAL_hal_04948533v1 A800624566 38978051 10_1186_s12984_024_01408_8 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | France |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: France |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29L 2QV 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 7RV 7X7 88E 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE I-F IAO IHR INH INR IPY ITC KQ8 L6V LK8 M0T M1P M48 M7P M7S ML0 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW XSB ~8M CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PMFND 7X8 PUEGO 1XC VOOES 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-980badd0d4f6d60c921e2a450c4949d9ebf1d7b546bfea8f9e664a35c07934a03 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1743-0003 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:03:37 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:32:19 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 06:31:04 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 24 03:39:24 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:09:16 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:08:48 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:50:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:20:02 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Lower limb Rehabilitation Mirror neuron system EEG Video feedback therapy |
Language | English |
License | 2024. The Author(s). Attribution - NonCommercial: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c521t-980badd0d4f6d60c921e2a450c4949d9ebf1d7b546bfea8f9e664a35c07934a03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-8581-1472 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606 |
PMID | 38978051 |
PQID | 3077176191 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11229246 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04948533v1 proquest_miscellaneous_3077176191 gale_infotracmisc_A800624566 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A800624566 pubmed_primary_38978051 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_024_01408_8 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-07-08 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-07-08 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2024 text: 2024-07-08 day: 08 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neuroeng Rehabil |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | DP Allen (1408_CR32) 2010; 186 I Kancheva (1408_CR57) 2023; 44 M Tani (1408_CR12) 2018; 133 A Stolk (1408_CR23) 2019; 8 G Bartur (1408_CR10) 2015; 1606 WD Byblow (1408_CR60) 2012; 7 F Hamzei (1408_CR14) 2012; 26 R Gatti (1408_CR39) 2017; 11 T In (1408_CR8) 2016; 28 SG Thorpe (1408_CR42) 2016; 127 T Zult (1408_CR13) 2015; 113 M Muthuraman (1408_CR61) 2012; 223 T Koelewijn (1408_CR25) 2008; 40 N Mizuguchi (1408_CR20) 2017; 234 M Zhao (1408_CR38) 2019; 9 H Nagai (1408_CR19) 2019; 27 A Mary (1408_CR50) 2015; 104 S Mathôt (1408_CR28) 2012; 44 L Dong (1408_CR29) 2017; 30 E Maris (1408_CR36) 2007; 164 L Casartelli (1408_CR55) 2017; 117 PG Wittkopf (1408_CR7) 2017; 63 Y Li (1408_CR4) 2018; 32 A Delorme (1408_CR30) 2004; 134 CT Shiner (1408_CR24) 2015; 1629 HM Hobson (1408_CR41) 2017; 4 F Torrecillos (1408_CR52) 2015; 35 G Pfurtscheller (1408_CR33) 1999; 110 H Thieme (1408_CR6) 2013; 27 P Giraux (1408_CR58) 2003; 20 ME Michielsen (1408_CR16) 2011; 82 P Cardellicchio (1408_CR26) 2020; 2 W Park (1408_CR22) 2021; 11 MT Jurkiewicz (1408_CR49) 2006; 32 E Heinrichs-Graham (1408_CR56) 2017; 222 RY Tai (1408_CR15) 2021; 11 JJ Gonzalez-Rosa (1408_CR37) 2015; 281 DR Louie (1408_CR3) 2019; 28 L Ding (1408_CR18) 2019; 33 NH Bhanpuri (1408_CR54) 2013; 33 RM Hardwick (1408_CR46) 2018; 94 S Aydore (1408_CR35) 2013; 74 MX Cohen (1408_CR31) 2019; 199 R Debnath (1408_CR40) 2019; 184 MX Cohen (1408_CR34) 2015; 97 B Buchignani (1408_CR9) 2019; 19 M Angelini (1408_CR45) 2018; 8 G Pfurtscheller (1408_CR48) 2005; 378 RC Oldfield (1408_CR27) 1971; 9 L Cao (1408_CR53) 2016; 36 KNK Fong (1408_CR47) 2021; 15 S McCombe Waller (1408_CR59) 2008; 269 P Broderick (1408_CR5) 2018; 63 EL Altschuler (1408_CR2) 1999; 353 Y Sun (1408_CR44) 2016; 23 H Kim (1408_CR1) 2023; 7 G Bartur (1408_CR11) 2018; 1700 JJQ Zhang (1408_CR43) 2018; 2018 W Cui (1408_CR17) 2022; 51 NA Fox (1408_CR21) 2016; 142 F Cassim (1408_CR51) 2001; 12 |
References_xml | – volume: 234 start-page: 189 year: 2017 ident: 1408_CR20 publication-title: Prog Brain Res doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008 – volume: 7 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 1408_CR60 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033882 – volume: 40 start-page: 767 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 1408_CR25 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.018 – volume: 19 start-page: 344 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1408_CR9 publication-title: BMC Neurol doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1533-x – volume: 11 start-page: 1284 issue: 10 year: 2021 ident: 1408_CR15 publication-title: Brain Sci doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101284 – volume: 74 start-page: 231 year: 2013 ident: 1408_CR35 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.008 – volume: 1700 start-page: 170 year: 2018 ident: 1408_CR11 publication-title: Brain Res doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.09.003 – volume: 36 start-page: 6365 issue: 24 year: 2016 ident: 1408_CR53 publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1007-16.2016 – volume: 44 start-page: 314 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 1408_CR28 publication-title: Behav Res Methods doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7 – volume: 110 start-page: 1842 issue: 11 year: 1999 ident: 1408_CR33 publication-title: Clin Neurophysiol doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8 – volume: 32 start-page: 1281 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 1408_CR49 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.005 – volume: 142 start-page: 291 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 1408_CR21 publication-title: Psychol Bull doi: 10.1037/bul0000031 – volume: 15 year: 2021 ident: 1408_CR47 publication-title: Front Hum Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.629592 – volume: 269 start-page: 96 issue: 1–2 year: 2008 ident: 1408_CR59 publication-title: J Neurol Sci doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.033 – volume: 8 start-page: 12429 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1408_CR45 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30912-w – volume: 27 start-page: 314 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 1408_CR6 publication-title: Clin Rehabil doi: 10.1177/0269215512455651 – volume: 30 start-page: 601 issue: 11 year: 2017 ident: 1408_CR29 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00601 – volume: 133 start-page: 7 year: 2018 ident: 1408_CR12 publication-title: Neurosci Res doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.10.002 – volume: 8 start-page: e48065 year: 2019 ident: 1408_CR23 publication-title: Elife doi: 10.7554/eLife.48065 – volume: 94 start-page: 31 year: 2018 ident: 1408_CR46 publication-title: Neurosci Biobehav Rev doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003 – volume: 35 start-page: 12753 issue: 37 year: 2015 ident: 1408_CR52 publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1090-15.2015 – volume: 63 start-page: 1000 issue: 11 year: 2017 ident: 1408_CR7 publication-title: Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.63.11.1000 – volume: 33 start-page: 307 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 1408_CR18 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968319836207 – volume: 1629 start-page: 26 year: 2015 ident: 1408_CR24 publication-title: Brain Res doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.09.037 – volume: 20 start-page: S107 year: 2003 ident: 1408_CR58 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.024 – volume: 51 start-page: 65 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 1408_CR17 publication-title: NeuroRehabilitation doi: 10.3233/NRE-210307 – volume: 11 issue: 15 year: 2021 ident: 1408_CR22 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.682113 – volume: 28 start-page: 107 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1408_CR3 publication-title: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.09.017 – volume: 353 start-page: 2035 issue: 9169 year: 1999 ident: 1408_CR2 publication-title: The Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00920-4 – volume: 186 start-page: 107 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 1408_CR32 publication-title: J Neurosci Methods doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.022 – volume: 12 start-page: 3859 issue: 17 year: 2001 ident: 1408_CR51 publication-title: NeuroReport doi: 10.1097/00001756-200112040-00051 – volume: 281 start-page: 290 year: 2015 ident: 1408_CR37 publication-title: Behav Brain Res doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.016 – volume: 104 start-page: 59 year: 2015 ident: 1408_CR50 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.010 – volume: 28 start-page: 4046 issue: 22 year: 2016 ident: 1408_CR8 publication-title: Med Sci Monit doi: 10.12659/MSM.898157 – volume: 97 start-page: 245 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 1408_CR34 publication-title: Int J Psychophysiol doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.09.013 – volume: 82 start-page: 393 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 1408_CR16 publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.194134 – volume: 113 start-page: 2262 issue: 7 year: 2015 ident: 1408_CR13 publication-title: J Neurophysiol doi: 10.1152/jn.00686.2014 – volume: 378 start-page: 156 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: 1408_CR48 publication-title: Neurosci Lett doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.034 – volume: 1606 start-page: 113 year: 2015 ident: 1408_CR10 publication-title: Brain Res doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.029 – volume: 127 start-page: 254 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 1408_CR42 publication-title: Clin Neurophysiol doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.004 – volume: 27 start-page: 1407 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 1408_CR19 publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2919194 – volume: 11 start-page: 565 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 1408_CR39 publication-title: Brain Imaging Behav doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9536-3 – volume: 32 start-page: 1007 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 1408_CR4 publication-title: Clin Rehabil doi: 10.1177/0269215518766642 – volume: 223 start-page: 489 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 1408_CR61 publication-title: Exp Brain Res doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3276-4 – volume: 2 start-page: 63 issue: 14 year: 2020 ident: 1408_CR26 publication-title: Front Syst Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00063 – volume: 33 start-page: 14301 issue: 36 year: 2013 ident: 1408_CR54 publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0784-13.2013 – volume: 9 start-page: 97 issue: 1 year: 1971 ident: 1408_CR27 publication-title: Neuropsychologia doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 – volume: 164 start-page: 177 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 1408_CR36 publication-title: J Neurosci Methods doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 – volume: 26 start-page: 484 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 1408_CR14 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968311427917 – volume: 9 start-page: 19464 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1408_CR38 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55369-3 – volume: 7 start-page: 75 issue: 4 year: 2023 ident: 1408_CR1 publication-title: Vision doi: 10.3390/vision7040075 – volume: 4 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 1408_CR41 publication-title: Royal Soc Open Sci doi: 10.1098/rsos.160662 – volume: 222 start-page: 3075 issue: 7 year: 2017 ident: 1408_CR56 publication-title: Brain Struct Funct doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1387-1 – volume: 134 start-page: 9 issue: 1 year: 2004 ident: 1408_CR30 publication-title: J Neurosci Methods doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 – volume: 44 start-page: 4263 issue: 12 year: 2023 ident: 1408_CR57 publication-title: Neurol Sci doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06982-8 – volume: 199 start-page: 81 year: 2019 ident: 1408_CR31 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.048 – volume: 184 start-page: 496 year: 2019 ident: 1408_CR40 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.053 – volume: 63 start-page: 208 year: 2018 ident: 1408_CR5 publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.05.017 – volume: 2018 start-page: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1408_CR43 publication-title: Neural Plast – volume: 23 start-page: 245 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 1408_CR44 publication-title: Top Stroke Rehabil doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1141472 – volume: 117 start-page: 1474 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 1408_CR55 publication-title: J Neurophysiol doi: 10.1152/jn.00771.2016 |
SSID | ssj0034054 |
Score | 2.3757374 |
Snippet | Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown benefits for... Background Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has shown... Abstract Background Video-feedback observational therapy (VOT) is an intensive rehabilitation technique based on movement repetition and visualization that has... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral hal proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 114 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Alpha Rhythm - physiology Biofeedback training Care and treatment EEG Electroencephalography Extremities, Lower Feedback, Sensory - physiology Female Healthy Volunteers Humans Imagination - physiology Leg Life Sciences Lower Extremity - physiology Lower limb Male Methods Mirror neuron system Neurons and Cognition Psychomotor Performance - physiology Rehabilitation Video feedback therapy Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Zj9MwELZ2FwnBA0e5CgsyiONhZXASx3GQECqoS4UoQqiV9s3yyUaUFJrtiv57xjmqBvaRV3tyyDPj-SbxfIPQU5uKzBufEU-znDCeKKKpEsTbRKUmNdTyUJw8_cwnc_bxJD3ZQ127o3YBqwtTu9BPar5avPz9a_MWHP5N7fCCv6ogZglGINqQkC8IIvbRJYhMWXDUKdv-VUgAnLCucObC63rBqebw3-7U-6fhoOS_KPTvw5Q70en4BrrWwko8auzgJtpz5QBd3SEbHKDL0_Y3-gA92-UWxrOGWAA_x197tN0DdP1Lq8VO5haaBTYPGIDoV1R46fEitFkji-KHxudFtYYpDwFRK_MdN7Vdm9dYlXg8_oBrKltclLgpvtzgaq3DZ6DqNpofj2fvJ6TtzEBMaIBAckE1bIzUMs8tpyaPIxcrllITyG5s7rSPbKZTxrV3Svjccc5UAqqH7YApmtxBB-WydPcQDr0_YmpM5K2GXFPrVMexSnITC29Sx4boqFOJ_NkQcMg6cRFcNgqUoEBZK1CKIXoXtLaVDOTZ9cBy9U22vigdZy7VgK0ibRjVNle5zgFI2TizBhK6IXoRdC6D0YFKjWorFeCFA1mWHIlQeQrIEyQPe5LgmqY3_QSspvcyk9EnGcYaWp4kOY-G6HFnVDJcHw69lW65riRsv5BsQ4YLMncbI9veC3Bm6EYBM6Jnfr2H9WfK4rSmDweEHUPWze__j7V6gK7EtQNlhIpDdHC2WruHANPO9KPa9_4AeVI5ng priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Neural basis of lower-limb visual feedback therapy: an EEG study in healthy subjects |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38978051 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3077176191 https://hal.science/hal-04948533 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11229246 https://doaj.org/article/e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELfYkBA88FG-CqMyiI-HyZqbOI7DW4faVRWdptFJfbP8qUWMFJF10v57znFaNfDACy-pZF9SK3fn313r-x1C720mcm98TjzNC8J4qoimShBvU5WZzFDLQ3Hy_JRPL9hsmS13Wn2FM2GRHji-uCPHmcs0AOFQG0a1LVShC0A9m-TW8Ei2DZi3SabiHpxCGMI2JTKCH9WAaoIRwCMSMgpBRAeGGrb-7Z68dxmORP4db_55bHIHhyaP0cM2gMSjuPAn6I6reujBDq1gD92bt3-Y99CHXRZhvIgUAvgjPu8QdPfQo7NWXxuZp2gReDtgAHCurPHK46vQUI1clT80vinrNUx5gD6tzHccq7huP2NV4fH4BDektbiscCyzvMX1WocffOpn6GIyXnyZkrYHAzGh1QEpBNWwBVLLPLecmiIZukSxjJpAa2MLp_3Q5jpjXHunhC8c50yloGRwfKZo-hztV6vKvUQ4dPlIqDFDbzVklVpnOklUWphEeJM51keHG5XIn5FqQzYpiuAyKlCCAmWjQCn66DhobSsZaLKbATAe2RqP_Jfx9NGnoHMZnBlUalRbkwALDrRYciRCjSnEmCB50JEEJzSd6XdgNZ3FTEdfZRiLBDxpejPso7cbo5Lh_nC8rXKrdS1ho4W0GnJZkHkRjWz7LIgoQ98JmBEd8-t8WXemKi8bonCIpRPIr_mr__GuXqP7SeNAOaHiAO1f_1q7NxCQXesB2suXOVzF5GSA7o5Gs28z-Dwen56dDxq_hOucid9v8Te8 |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural+basis+of+lower-limb+visual+feedback+therapy%3A+an+EEG+study+in+healthy+subjects&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroengineering+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Ahmed+Adham&rft.au=Ba+Thien+Le&rft.au=Julien+Bonnal&rft.au=Hugo+Bessaguet&rft.date=2024-07-08&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12984-024-01408-8&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_e64e5b0711bc40bd9a9b9431d27dc606 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |