Longitudinal Molecular Epidemiological Study of Thermophilic Campylobacters on One Conventional Broiler Chicken Farm
Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and...
Saved in:
Published in | Applied and Environmental Microbiology Vol. 77; no. 1; pp. 98 - 107 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington, DC
American Society for Microbiology
01.01.2011
American Society for Microbiology (ASM) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Classifications
Services
AEM
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Related Content
Social Bookmarking
CiteULike
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Google+
Mendeley
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Twitter
current issue
Spotlights in the Current Issue
AEM
About
AEM
Subscribers
Authors
Reviewers
Advertisers
Inquiries from the Press
Permissions & Commercial Reprints
ASM Journals Public Access Policy
AEM
RSS Feeds
1752 N Street N.W. • Washington DC 20036
202.737.3600 • 202.942.9355 fax • journals@asmusa.org
Print ISSN:
0099-2240
Online ISSN:
1098-5336
Copyright © 2014
by the
American Society for Microbiology.
For an alternate route to
AEM
.asm.org, visit:
AEM
Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms. Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms. ABSTRACT Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms. |
Author | Harris, Jillian A Morris, Victoria K Allen, Vivien M Kennedy, Emma M Newell, Diane G Ridley, Anne M Cawthraw, Shaun A Ellis-Iversen, Johanne |
AuthorAffiliation | Department for Food and Environmental Safety, 1 Centre for Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, Veterinary Laboratories Agency—Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, United Kingdom, 3 Veterinary Science Evidence Base, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London SW1P 3JR, United Kingdom, 4 Foodborne Zoonoses Consultancy, Andover SP11 7AW, United Kingdom 5 |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department for Food and Environmental Safety, 1 Centre for Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, Veterinary Laboratories Agency—Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, United Kingdom, 3 Veterinary Science Evidence Base, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London SW1P 3JR, United Kingdom, 4 Foodborne Zoonoses Consultancy, Andover SP11 7AW, United Kingdom 5 |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Ridley, Anne M – sequence: 2 fullname: Morris, Victoria K – sequence: 3 fullname: Cawthraw, Shaun A – sequence: 4 fullname: Ellis-Iversen, Johanne – sequence: 5 fullname: Harris, Jillian A – sequence: 6 fullname: Kennedy, Emma M – sequence: 7 fullname: Newell, Diane G – sequence: 8 fullname: Allen, Vivien M |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23756750$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21037294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkkFv1DAQRi1URLeFG2eIkBAXUsZ2EscXpLLaAtJWPbQ9W3bibFwcO9hJ0f57vOzSAhdOljxPTzPzzQk6ct5phF5iOMOY1B_OV5dngGld5xieoAUGXuclpdURWgBwnhNSwDE6ifEOAAqo6mfomGCgjPBigaa1dxszza1x0maX3upmtjJkq9G0ejDe-o1pUuU6IdvMd9lNr8Pgx95Y02RLOYxb65VsJh1i5l125XS29O5eu8n4nfJT8MbqkC1703zTLruQYXiOnnbSRv3i8J6i24vVzfJLvr76_HV5vs6bksCUtxVpVUdK0G0DBLDqKkx4h3GhFCFKMyJrzWrZdrwsFStaWktgrFSKq5aCoqfo4947zmpIktRUkFaMwQwybIWXRvxdcaYXG38vKGDOCpwE7w6C4L_POk5iMLHR1kqn_RxFXVaMEWD8_yTBmJMa75xv_iHv_BzSqhJUpPZTfpCg93uoCT7GoLuHpjGIXewixS5-xZ5-Ev7qz0Ef4N85J-DtAZAxxdkF6RoTHznK0iTlTvR6z_Vm0_8wQQsZByH1IBgTWPD6keikF3ITkuX2OoWzWxlNZ1fRnyWGzHU |
CODEN | AEMIDF |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture3040700 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2020_6090 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijfoodmicro_2021_109046 crossref_primary_10_3390_app13106073 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0116585 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2021_6651 crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2011_2105 crossref_primary_10_1089_fpd_2019_2645 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_982693 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2014_01_019 crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_2012_02496 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2016_00593 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fm_2016_11_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijfoodmicro_2020_108641 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fm_2022_103998 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_01090_10 crossref_primary_10_1128_JCM_01522_16 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0094782 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11102492 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2018_01676 crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_pew364 crossref_primary_10_1017_S095026881100118X crossref_primary_10_1111_jam_12986 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2023_102905 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods8030111 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0950268813002926 crossref_primary_10_1637_aviandiseases_D_23_00004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11274_019_2722_x crossref_primary_10_1111_tbed_12870 crossref_primary_10_4315_0362_028X_JFP_15_331 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0950268813001222 crossref_primary_10_1111_1541_4337_12124 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0104905 crossref_primary_10_3390_pathogens11111366 crossref_primary_10_1099_mic_0_062000_0 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_02001_20 crossref_primary_10_1089_vbz_2011_0676 crossref_primary_10_1637_11072_032315_Review crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vetmic_2012_03_042 crossref_primary_10_2478_aoas_2020_0008 |
Cites_doi | 10.1128/AEM.01242-07 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001 10.1016/0168-1605(94)00135-S 10.1128/AEM.00462-08 10.1017/S0950268807009223 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02995.x 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.038 10.3201/eid1406.071008 10.1128/JCM.43.1.340-347.2005 10.2307/1593076 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03291.x 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.010 10.1128/AEM.02991-05 10.1128/AEM.66.1.1-9.2000 10.1128/AEM.01669-07 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.02.012 10.4315/0362-028X-71.2.264 10.1128/jcm.35.11.2810-2814.1997 10.1128/AEM.00499-09 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00845-0 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00143-4 10.4315/0362-028X-64.11.1705 10.3201/eid1302.060620 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.010 10.2307/1592343 10.3382/ps.2008-00132 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.004 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00782.x 10.4315/0362-028X-72.3.490 10.1128/AEM.00884-07 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02781.x 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.09.003 10.1086/597402 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00926.x 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.12.x 10.1128/AEM.72.1.645-652.2006 10.1186/1746-6148-3-30 10.3201/eid1509.080773 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4343-4351.2003 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03759.x 10.1099/00221287-139-6-1171 10.3201/eid1008.040129 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01143.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright American Society for Microbiology Jan 2011 Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology 2011 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright American Society for Microbiology Jan 2011 – notice: Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology 2011 |
DBID | FBQ IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7ST 7T7 7TM 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 M7N P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1128/AEM.01388-10 |
DatabaseName | AGRIS Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Nucleic Acids Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Virology and AIDS Abstracts Technology Research Database Nucleic Acids Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Biotechnology Research Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Engineering Research Database Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Environment Abstracts MEDLINE Virology and AIDS Abstracts CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics Engineering Biology |
EISSN | 1098-5336 |
EndPage | 107 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2241174331 10_1128_AEM_01388_10 21037294 23756750 aem_77_1_98 US201301933366 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .55 .GJ 0R~ 23M 2WC 39C 3O- 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 85S AAZTW ABOGM ABPPZ ABPTK ABTAH ACBTR ACGFO ACIWK ACNCT ACPRK ADBBV AENEX AFFNX AFMIJ AFRAH AGCDD AI. ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BKOMP BTFSW C1A CS3 D0L DIK E.- E3Z EBS EJD F20 F5P FBQ GX1 HYE HZ~ H~9 K-O KQ8 L7B MVM NEJ O9- OHT OK1 P2P PQQKQ RHF RHI RNS RPM RSF RXW TAE TAF TN5 TR2 TWZ UCJ UHB VH1 W8F WH7 WHG WOQ X6Y X7M XFK XJT YV5 ZA5 ZCG ZGI ZXP ZY4 ~02 ~KM 08R AAPBV AAUGY H13 IQODW ADUKH AGVNZ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7ST 7T7 7TM 7U9 8FD C1K FR3 H94 M7N P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-d62dbf250edc0201bf6129f114bb22be72a8e78adf955b74d38a0775bb9bd30b3 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 0099-2240 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:21:37 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 00:33:23 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 04:21:11 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 22:10:21 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 20:09:54 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:56:47 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 29 17:08:37 EDT 2023 Wed May 18 15:29:05 EDT 2016 Wed Dec 27 18:59:12 EST 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Vertebrata Campylobacteraceae Bacteria Thermophily Chicken Aves Epidemiology Campylobacter |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c520t-d62dbf250edc0201bf6129f114bb22be72a8e78adf955b74d38a0775bb9bd30b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01388-10 |
PMID | 21037294 |
PQID | 840770980 |
PQPubID | 42251 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | pascalfrancis_primary_23756750 proquest_miscellaneous_856772079 proquest_miscellaneous_821192811 highwire_asm_aem_77_1_98 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3019741 proquest_journals_840770980 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_01388_10 pubmed_primary_21037294 fao_agris_US201301933366 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2011-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2011 text: 2011-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Washington, DC |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Washington, DC – name: United States – name: Washington |
PublicationTitle | Applied and Environmental Microbiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Appl Environ Microbiol |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | American Society for Microbiology American Society for Microbiology (ASM) |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Society for Microbiology – name: American Society for Microbiology (ASM) |
References | 12081556 - Lett Appl Microbiol. 2002;35(1):85-9 10618195 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Jan;66(1):1-9 17997846 - BMC Vet Res. 2007;3:30 18809860 - Poult Sci. 2008 Oct;87(10):1987-94 18298527 - J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Jul;105(1):95-104 17040237 - J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Nov;101(5):1130-9 19343935 - J Food Prot. 2009 Mar;72(3):490-6 18203857 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;74(8):2492-504 18508146 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Jul 15;125(2):182-7 11136741 - J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):14-23 16957196 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):5794-8 11726147 - J Food Prot. 2001 Nov;64(11):1705-10 19275496 - Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Apr 15;48(8):1072-8 10913805 - Prev Vet Med. 2000 Aug 10;46(3):209-23 12902214 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4343-51 14680705 - FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 Dec 12;229(2):237-41 18507899 - Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Jun;14(6):895-901 9350739 - J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Nov;35(11):2810-4 17714397 - J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Sep;103(3):640-9 17655782 - Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Jun;136(6):739-51 16391102 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jan;72(1):645-52 17479890 - Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;13(2):267-72 17586665 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5125-9 19788807 - Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Sep;15(9):1402-8 9454923 - Avian Dis. 1997 Oct-Dec;41(4):890-8 16430507 - J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Feb;100(2):306-15 11195658 - Avian Dis. 2000 Oct-Dec;44(4):983-8 7488525 - Int J Food Microbiol. 1995 Aug;26(3):295-303 19700557 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Oct;75(19):6275-81 15496257 - Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Aug;10(8):1490-2 8360610 - J Gen Microbiol. 1993 Jun;139 Pt 6:1171-5 12675942 - J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94 Suppl:104S-113S 15634992 - J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jan;43(1):340-7 16011749 - Environ Microbiol. 2005 Aug;7(8):1116-26 18424539 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;74(12):3626-33 19303724 - Vet Microbiol. 2009 Jul 2;138(1-2):120-31 17958495 - Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):831-44 15154683 - Prev Vet Med. 2004 Jan 30;62(1):35-49 19329201 - Prev Vet Med. 2009 Jun 1;89(3-4):178-84 18326174 - J Food Prot. 2008 Feb;71(2):264-70 18641155 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Sep;74(17):5408-13 18249451 - Prev Vet Med. 2008 May 15;84(3-4):261-76 19269051 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Aug 31;134(1-2):96-103 e_1_3_2_26_2 e_1_3_2_27_2 e_1_3_2_28_2 e_1_3_2_29_2 e_1_3_2_41_2 e_1_3_2_40_2 e_1_3_2_20_2 e_1_3_2_43_2 e_1_3_2_21_2 e_1_3_2_42_2 e_1_3_2_22_2 e_1_3_2_23_2 e_1_3_2_44_2 e_1_3_2_24_2 e_1_3_2_25_2 e_1_3_2_9_2 e_1_3_2_15_2 e_1_3_2_38_2 e_1_3_2_8_2 e_1_3_2_16_2 e_1_3_2_37_2 e_1_3_2_7_2 e_1_3_2_17_2 e_1_3_2_6_2 e_1_3_2_18_2 e_1_3_2_39_2 e_1_3_2_19_2 e_1_3_2_30_2 e_1_3_2_32_2 e_1_3_2_10_2 e_1_3_2_31_2 e_1_3_2_5_2 e_1_3_2_11_2 e_1_3_2_34_2 e_1_3_2_4_2 e_1_3_2_12_2 e_1_3_2_33_2 e_1_3_2_3_2 e_1_3_2_13_2 e_1_3_2_36_2 e_1_3_2_2_2 e_1_3_2_14_2 e_1_3_2_35_2 |
References_xml | – ident: e_1_3_2_32_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01242-07 – ident: e_1_3_2_10_2 doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001 – ident: e_1_3_2_20_2 doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)00135-S – ident: e_1_3_2_7_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00462-08 – ident: e_1_3_2_28_2 doi: 10.1017/S0950268807009223 – ident: e_1_3_2_21_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02995.x – ident: e_1_3_2_44_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.038 – ident: e_1_3_2_38_2 doi: 10.3201/eid1406.071008 – ident: e_1_3_2_9_2 doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.340-347.2005 – ident: e_1_3_2_37_2 doi: 10.2307/1593076 – ident: e_1_3_2_18_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03291.x – ident: e_1_3_2_25_2 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.010 – ident: e_1_3_2_8_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02991-05 – ident: e_1_3_2_42_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.1.1-9.2000 – ident: e_1_3_2_22_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01669-07 – ident: e_1_3_2_27_2 doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.02.012 – ident: e_1_3_2_3_2 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-71.2.264 – ident: e_1_3_2_26_2 doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.11.2810-2814.1997 – ident: e_1_3_2_34_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00499-09 – ident: e_1_3_2_4_2 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00845-0 – ident: e_1_3_2_13_2 doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00143-4 – ident: e_1_3_2_40_2 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-64.11.1705 – ident: e_1_3_2_24_2 doi: 10.3201/eid1302.060620 – ident: e_1_3_2_35_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.010 – ident: e_1_3_2_15_2 doi: 10.2307/1592343 – ident: e_1_3_2_23_2 doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00132 – ident: e_1_3_2_12_2 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.004 – ident: e_1_3_2_14_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00782.x – ident: e_1_3_2_11_2 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.3.490 – ident: e_1_3_2_31_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00884-07 – ident: e_1_3_2_2_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02781.x – ident: e_1_3_2_5_2 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.09.003 – ident: e_1_3_2_36_2 doi: 10.1086/597402 – ident: e_1_3_2_19_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00926.x – ident: e_1_3_2_39_2 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.12.x – ident: e_1_3_2_6_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.645-652.2006 – ident: e_1_3_2_16_2 doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-3-30 – ident: e_1_3_2_41_2 doi: 10.3201/eid1509.080773 – ident: e_1_3_2_29_2 doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4343-4351.2003 – ident: e_1_3_2_33_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03759.x – ident: e_1_3_2_43_2 doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-6-1171 – ident: e_1_3_2_17_2 doi: 10.3201/eid1008.040129 – ident: e_1_3_2_30_2 doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01143.x |
SSID | ssj0004068 |
Score | 2.270002 |
Snippet | Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies... Classifications Services AEM Citing Articles Google Scholar PubMed Related Content Social Bookmarking CiteULike Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit... ABSTRACT Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based... Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed pascalfrancis highwire fao |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 98 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Biological and medical sciences Campylobacter Campylobacter - classification Campylobacter - isolation & purification Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology Campylobacter Infections - veterinary Carrier State - epidemiology Carrier State - veterinary Cattle Chickens Cluster Analysis Environmental Microbiology Epidemiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genotype & phenotype Gram-negative bacteria Longitudinal Studies Microbiology Molecular Epidemiology Molecular Typing Poultry Public Health Microbiology Risk assessment |
Title | Longitudinal Molecular Epidemiological Study of Thermophilic Campylobacters on One Conventional Broiler Chicken Farm |
URI | http://aem.asm.org/content/77/1/98.abstract https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21037294 https://www.proquest.com/docview/840770980 https://search.proquest.com/docview/821192811 https://search.proquest.com/docview/856772079 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3019741 |
Volume | 77 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELa2KyHggKA8tixUPsAxbeI8bB9XVasVUB6CSnuz7MSGFSSpmvbQf89MEndbhDgg9RQ7tZyZycxkPn9DyBthkjxOnA3AdSUB-FsdmEi4wIFvthIi1ES3aIuP2fUqeXeT3pyR1J-FaUH7ubmdVL_KSXX7o8VWrst86nFi08_LGSglhMHRdEAGoKA-RfeHIcNMeOpJ9Fce7c7E9Gq-nGBlDglNWxbgEItWyYlLGjhdH5EFI1ZSN_C4XNfn4m-B6J94yiMHtXhMHvWRJb3qdvCEnNlqSO51vSb3Q3LfH0FuhuThEQvhU7L9UGPTol2BDbLo0vfLpfO75rEoSYqQwz2tHQXV2pT1Gj_F5BSLF3tkFUHW54bWFf1UWTo7ArNTSPXh3bOhCPv4aSu60JvyGVkt5t9m10HfjCHIUxZugyJjhXEQMME2IcSMjIPYSDpIp4xhzFjOtLBc6MLJNDU8KWKhkV7PGGmKODTxc3Je1ZW9IDSWhWaJtlxrSGZCo3mey1jaPE1d4SI5Im-9PNS649xQba7ChAIRqlaEcGVELkBYSn-H16FafWVYhIV4NI6zDIa8BJVuSqVtqThXkZJiRMYnEj0swWKegnLC3156EaveoBsFeTDnoRQwSg-jYIlYXtGVrXcwBcnymIiif0yBBTgLOWzxRacyd6v3yjgi_ESZDhOQB_x0BMyj5QPvzeHlf995SR50n8rx94qcbzc7-xpira0Zk8H7L2LcWthvTNgpDA |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,730,783,787,888,27936,27937,53804,53806 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFD7ahtDYA5cyWBkMP8Bj2sS52HkcVasC7UBiRXuz7MSGaSSpennofj3HSd21E0ICqU-xU8vJZ59zcj5_B-AdV1EWRkZ7aLoiD-2t9FTAjWfQNusUPdRI1myLi2Q4iT5dxVd7ELuzMDVpP1PXnfJX0Smvf9bcymmRdR1PrPt13ENQohscdPfhAa5XP3JBujsO6SfciU9ai-X47pR3z_vjjs3NWUnTWgfYt2mraMco7RtZbckFW7aknOMDM02liz-5ovcZlVsmavAEvrvJNcyUm85yoTrZ7T3dx3-e_VN4vHZayXnT_Az2dNmCh00Zy1ULDt3p5nkLjrYEDp_DYlTZekjL3NbeImNXipf07-rSWpAQy2ZckcoQRO2sqKb2K09GbF5kZQVLrKD0nFQl-VJq0tviyZMPswq3tRmxjJIbXZKBnBXHMBn0L3tDb13nwcti6i-8PKG5MuiL4fND7zVQBt2u1GCkphSlSjMquWZc5iaNY8WiPOTSKvcplao89FX4Ag7KqtQnQMI0lzSSmkmJcZKvJMuyNEx1FscmN0HahvfuRYtpI-ch6jCIcoHYEDU28EobThAFQv7AnVZMvlGb30VXNwyTBJscNIScF0LqQjAmApHyNpztQGUzBA1ZjLjHvz112BHrvWIuMMRmzE85tpJNKy5ym7mRpa6W2MXq8FEeBH_pggMw6jOc4ssGi3ejr1HeBraD0k0HKzG-24LYq6XG11h79d93voXD4eV4JEYfLz6fwqPmi7z9vYaDxWyp36BLt1Bn9QL-DbEOSgY |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbYELcHLh1jZTD8AI-5ORfbj6O0GrCOSVBp4sWyExumLUnVtA_l13Oc1F07IR4m5Sl2YsX57HNOzpfvIPSeqSSPE6M9MF2JB_ZWeipixjNgmzUHDzWRLdviLDuZJF8u0ouNUl8taT9Xl351XfrV5e-WWzkt88DxxILz8QBACW5wFEwLE-yg-7Bmw8wF6u6XyDBjToDSWi3HeScsOB6OfZufs7KmrRZwaFNXyZZh2jGy3pAMtoxJ2cCkma7axb_c0dusyg0zNXqGfroH7NgpV_5irvz8zy3txzvNwHP0dOW84uOuywt0T1c99KArZ7nsoUfuL-emh55sCB3uoflpbesiLQpbgwuPXUlePLypT2vBgi2rcYlrgwG9s7Ke2q89Obb5kaUVLrHC0g2uK_yt0niwwZfHH2c1bG8zbJklV7rCIzkrX6LJaPhjcOKt6j14eUrCuVdkpFAGfDKYQ_BiI2XA_eIGIjalCFGaEsk0ZbIwPE0VTYqYSavgpxRXRRyqeB_tVnWlDxCOeSFJIjWVEuKlUEma5zzmOk9TU5iI99EH97LFtJP1EG04RJgAfIgWH3Cmjw4ACUL-gh1XTL4Tm-cFlzeOswyaHDyEbEohdSkoFZHgrI-OtuCyHoLENAX8w20PHX7Eas9oBITalIacQStet8JitxkcWel6AV2sHh9hUfSfLjAAJSGFR3zV4fFm9BXS-4huIXXdwUqNb7cA_lrJ8RXeXt_5ynfo4fmnkTj9fPb1ED3uPszb4w3anc8W-i14dnN11K7hv--NTIY |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Longitudinal+Molecular+Epidemiological+Study+of+Thermophilic+Campylobacters+on+One+Conventional+Broiler+Chicken+Farm&rft.jtitle=Applied+and+environmental+microbiology&rft.au=RIDLEY%2C+Anne+M&rft.au=MORRIS%2C+Victoria+K&rft.au=CAWTHRAW%2C+Shaun+A&rft.au=ELLIS-IVERSEN%2C+Johanne&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.pub=American+Society+for+Microbiology&rft.issn=0099-2240&rft.eissn=1098-5336&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128%2FAEM.01388-10&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=23756750 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon |