Longitudinal Molecular Epidemiological Study of Thermophilic Campylobacters on One Conventional Broiler Chicken Farm

Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied and Environmental Microbiology Vol. 77; no. 1; pp. 98 - 107
Main Authors Ridley, Anne M, Morris, Victoria K, Cawthraw, Shaun A, Ellis-Iversen, Johanne, Harris, Jillian A, Kennedy, Emma M, Newell, Diane G, Allen, Vivien M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Society for Microbiology 01.01.2011
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms.
AbstractList Classifications Services AEM Citing Articles Google Scholar PubMed Related Content Social Bookmarking CiteULike Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit StumbleUpon Twitter current issue Spotlights in the Current Issue AEM About AEM Subscribers Authors Reviewers Advertisers Inquiries from the Press Permissions & Commercial Reprints ASM Journals Public Access Policy AEM RSS Feeds 1752 N Street N.W. • Washington DC 20036 202.737.3600 • 202.942.9355 fax • journals@asmusa.org Print ISSN: 0099-2240 Online ISSN: 1098-5336 Copyright © 2014 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to AEM .asm.org, visit: AEM       
Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms.
Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms.
ABSTRACT Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies for preventing flock colonization. The sources of Campylobacter causing broiler flock colonization were investigated on one poultry farm and its environment, from which samples were obtained on three occasions during each of 15 crop cycles. The farm was adjacent to a dairy farm, with which there was a shared concreted area and secondary entrance. There was considerable variation in the Campylobacter status of flocks at the various sampling times, at median ages of 20, 26, and 35 days, with 3 of the 15 flocks remaining negative at slaughter. Campylobacters were recoverable from various locations around the farm, even while the flock was Campylobacter negative, but the degree of environmental contamination increased substantially once the flock was positive. Molecular typing showed that strains from house surroundings and the dairy farm were similar to those subsequently detected in the flock and that several strains intermittently persisted through multiple crop cycles. The longitudinal nature of the study suggested that bovine fecal Campylobacter strains, initially recovered from the dairy yard, may subsequently colonize poultry. One such strain, despite being repeatedly recovered from the dairy areas, failed to colonize the concomitant flock during later crop cycles. The possibility of host adaptation of this strain was investigated with 16-day-old chickens experimentally exposed to this strain naturally present in, or spiked into, bovine feces. Although the birds became colonized by this infection model, the strain may preferentially infect cattle. The presence of Campylobacter genotypes in the external environment of the poultry farm, prior to their detection in broiler chickens, confirms the horizontal transmission of these bacteria into the flock and highlights the risk from multispecies farms.
Author Harris, Jillian A
Morris, Victoria K
Allen, Vivien M
Kennedy, Emma M
Newell, Diane G
Ridley, Anne M
Cawthraw, Shaun A
Ellis-Iversen, Johanne
AuthorAffiliation Department for Food and Environmental Safety, 1 Centre for Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, Veterinary Laboratories Agency—Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, United Kingdom, 3 Veterinary Science Evidence Base, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London SW1P 3JR, United Kingdom, 4 Foodborne Zoonoses Consultancy, Andover SP11 7AW, United Kingdom 5
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department for Food and Environmental Safety, 1 Centre for Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, Veterinary Laboratories Agency—Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, United Kingdom, 3 Veterinary Science Evidence Base, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London SW1P 3JR, United Kingdom, 4 Foodborne Zoonoses Consultancy, Andover SP11 7AW, United Kingdom 5
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Ridley, Anne M
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Morris, Victoria K
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Cawthraw, Shaun A
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Ellis-Iversen, Johanne
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Harris, Jillian A
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Kennedy, Emma M
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Newell, Diane G
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Allen, Vivien M
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23756750$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21037294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkkFv1DAQRi1URLeFG2eIkBAXUsZ2EscXpLLaAtJWPbQ9W3bibFwcO9hJ0f57vOzSAhdOljxPTzPzzQk6ct5phF5iOMOY1B_OV5dngGld5xieoAUGXuclpdURWgBwnhNSwDE6ifEOAAqo6mfomGCgjPBigaa1dxszza1x0maX3upmtjJkq9G0ejDe-o1pUuU6IdvMd9lNr8Pgx95Y02RLOYxb65VsJh1i5l125XS29O5eu8n4nfJT8MbqkC1703zTLruQYXiOnnbSRv3i8J6i24vVzfJLvr76_HV5vs6bksCUtxVpVUdK0G0DBLDqKkx4h3GhFCFKMyJrzWrZdrwsFStaWktgrFSKq5aCoqfo4947zmpIktRUkFaMwQwybIWXRvxdcaYXG38vKGDOCpwE7w6C4L_POk5iMLHR1kqn_RxFXVaMEWD8_yTBmJMa75xv_iHv_BzSqhJUpPZTfpCg93uoCT7GoLuHpjGIXewixS5-xZ5-Ev7qz0Ef4N85J-DtAZAxxdkF6RoTHznK0iTlTvR6z_Vm0_8wQQsZByH1IBgTWPD6keikF3ITkuX2OoWzWxlNZ1fRnyWGzHU
CODEN AEMIDF
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture3040700
crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2020_6090
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijfoodmicro_2021_109046
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13106073
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0116585
crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2021_6651
crossref_primary_10_2903_j_efsa_2011_2105
crossref_primary_10_1089_fpd_2019_2645
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_982693
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2014_01_019
crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_2012_02496
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2016_00593
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fm_2016_11_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijfoodmicro_2020_108641
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fm_2022_103998
crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_01090_10
crossref_primary_10_1128_JCM_01522_16
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0094782
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11102492
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2018_01676
crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_pew364
crossref_primary_10_1017_S095026881100118X
crossref_primary_10_1111_jam_12986
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psj_2023_102905
crossref_primary_10_3390_foods8030111
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0950268813002926
crossref_primary_10_1637_aviandiseases_D_23_00004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11274_019_2722_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbed_12870
crossref_primary_10_4315_0362_028X_JFP_15_331
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0950268813001222
crossref_primary_10_1111_1541_4337_12124
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0104905
crossref_primary_10_3390_pathogens11111366
crossref_primary_10_1099_mic_0_062000_0
crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_02001_20
crossref_primary_10_1089_vbz_2011_0676
crossref_primary_10_1637_11072_032315_Review
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vetmic_2012_03_042
crossref_primary_10_2478_aoas_2020_0008
Cites_doi 10.1128/AEM.01242-07
10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001
10.1016/0168-1605(94)00135-S
10.1128/AEM.00462-08
10.1017/S0950268807009223
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02995.x
10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.038
10.3201/eid1406.071008
10.1128/JCM.43.1.340-347.2005
10.2307/1593076
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03291.x
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.010
10.1128/AEM.02991-05
10.1128/AEM.66.1.1-9.2000
10.1128/AEM.01669-07
10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.02.012
10.4315/0362-028X-71.2.264
10.1128/jcm.35.11.2810-2814.1997
10.1128/AEM.00499-09
10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00845-0
10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00143-4
10.4315/0362-028X-64.11.1705
10.3201/eid1302.060620
10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.010
10.2307/1592343
10.3382/ps.2008-00132
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.004
10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00782.x
10.4315/0362-028X-72.3.490
10.1128/AEM.00884-07
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02781.x
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.09.003
10.1086/597402
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00926.x
10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.12.x
10.1128/AEM.72.1.645-652.2006
10.1186/1746-6148-3-30
10.3201/eid1509.080773
10.1128/AEM.69.8.4343-4351.2003
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03759.x
10.1099/00221287-139-6-1171
10.3201/eid1008.040129
10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01143.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright American Society for Microbiology Jan 2011
Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology 2011
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright American Society for Microbiology Jan 2011
– notice: Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology 2011
DBID FBQ
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QL
7QO
7SN
7SS
7ST
7T7
7TM
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
M7N
P64
RC3
SOI
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1128/AEM.01388-10
DatabaseName AGRIS
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Environment Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Entomology Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Environment Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Environment Abstracts

MEDLINE
Virology and AIDS Abstracts

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
Engineering
Biology
EISSN 1098-5336
EndPage 107
ExternalDocumentID 2241174331
10_1128_AEM_01388_10
21037294
23756750
aem_77_1_98
US201301933366
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.55
.GJ
0R~
23M
2WC
39C
3O-
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
85S
AAZTW
ABOGM
ABPPZ
ABPTK
ABTAH
ACBTR
ACGFO
ACIWK
ACNCT
ACPRK
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AFMIJ
AFRAH
AGCDD
AI.
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BKOMP
BTFSW
C1A
CS3
D0L
DIK
E.-
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F20
F5P
FBQ
GX1
HYE
HZ~
H~9
K-O
KQ8
L7B
MVM
NEJ
O9-
OHT
OK1
P2P
PQQKQ
RHF
RHI
RNS
RPM
RSF
RXW
TAE
TAF
TN5
TR2
TWZ
UCJ
UHB
VH1
W8F
WH7
WHG
WOQ
X6Y
X7M
XFK
XJT
YV5
ZA5
ZCG
ZGI
ZXP
ZY4
~02
~KM
08R
AAPBV
AAUGY
H13
IQODW
ADUKH
AGVNZ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QL
7QO
7SN
7SS
7ST
7T7
7TM
7U9
8FD
C1K
FR3
H94
M7N
P64
RC3
SOI
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-d62dbf250edc0201bf6129f114bb22be72a8e78adf955b74d38a0775bb9bd30b3
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 0099-2240
IngestDate Tue Sep 17 21:21:37 EDT 2024
Sat Oct 26 00:33:23 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 04:21:11 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:10:21 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 12 20:09:54 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:56:47 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 29 17:08:37 EDT 2023
Wed May 18 15:29:05 EDT 2016
Wed Dec 27 18:59:12 EST 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Vertebrata
Campylobacteraceae
Bacteria
Thermophily
Chicken
Aves
Epidemiology
Campylobacter
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c520t-d62dbf250edc0201bf6129f114bb22be72a8e78adf955b74d38a0775bb9bd30b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01388-10
PMID 21037294
PQID 840770980
PQPubID 42251
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pascalfrancis_primary_23756750
proquest_miscellaneous_856772079
proquest_miscellaneous_821192811
highwire_asm_aem_77_1_98
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3019741
proquest_journals_840770980
crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_01388_10
pubmed_primary_21037294
fao_agris_US201301933366
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Washington, DC
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Washington, DC
– name: United States
– name: Washington
PublicationTitle Applied and Environmental Microbiology
PublicationTitleAlternate Appl Environ Microbiol
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher American Society for Microbiology
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
Publisher_xml – name: American Society for Microbiology
– name: American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
References 12081556 - Lett Appl Microbiol. 2002;35(1):85-9
10618195 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Jan;66(1):1-9
17997846 - BMC Vet Res. 2007;3:30
18809860 - Poult Sci. 2008 Oct;87(10):1987-94
18298527 - J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Jul;105(1):95-104
17040237 - J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Nov;101(5):1130-9
19343935 - J Food Prot. 2009 Mar;72(3):490-6
18203857 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;74(8):2492-504
18508146 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Jul 15;125(2):182-7
11136741 - J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):14-23
16957196 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):5794-8
11726147 - J Food Prot. 2001 Nov;64(11):1705-10
19275496 - Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Apr 15;48(8):1072-8
10913805 - Prev Vet Med. 2000 Aug 10;46(3):209-23
12902214 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4343-51
14680705 - FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 Dec 12;229(2):237-41
18507899 - Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Jun;14(6):895-901
9350739 - J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Nov;35(11):2810-4
17714397 - J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Sep;103(3):640-9
17655782 - Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Jun;136(6):739-51
16391102 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jan;72(1):645-52
17479890 - Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;13(2):267-72
17586665 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5125-9
19788807 - Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Sep;15(9):1402-8
9454923 - Avian Dis. 1997 Oct-Dec;41(4):890-8
16430507 - J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Feb;100(2):306-15
11195658 - Avian Dis. 2000 Oct-Dec;44(4):983-8
7488525 - Int J Food Microbiol. 1995 Aug;26(3):295-303
19700557 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Oct;75(19):6275-81
15496257 - Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Aug;10(8):1490-2
8360610 - J Gen Microbiol. 1993 Jun;139 Pt 6:1171-5
12675942 - J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94 Suppl:104S-113S
15634992 - J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jan;43(1):340-7
16011749 - Environ Microbiol. 2005 Aug;7(8):1116-26
18424539 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;74(12):3626-33
19303724 - Vet Microbiol. 2009 Jul 2;138(1-2):120-31
17958495 - Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):831-44
15154683 - Prev Vet Med. 2004 Jan 30;62(1):35-49
19329201 - Prev Vet Med. 2009 Jun 1;89(3-4):178-84
18326174 - J Food Prot. 2008 Feb;71(2):264-70
18641155 - Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Sep;74(17):5408-13
18249451 - Prev Vet Med. 2008 May 15;84(3-4):261-76
19269051 - Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Aug 31;134(1-2):96-103
e_1_3_2_26_2
e_1_3_2_27_2
e_1_3_2_28_2
e_1_3_2_29_2
e_1_3_2_41_2
e_1_3_2_40_2
e_1_3_2_20_2
e_1_3_2_43_2
e_1_3_2_21_2
e_1_3_2_42_2
e_1_3_2_22_2
e_1_3_2_23_2
e_1_3_2_44_2
e_1_3_2_24_2
e_1_3_2_25_2
e_1_3_2_9_2
e_1_3_2_15_2
e_1_3_2_38_2
e_1_3_2_8_2
e_1_3_2_16_2
e_1_3_2_37_2
e_1_3_2_7_2
e_1_3_2_17_2
e_1_3_2_6_2
e_1_3_2_18_2
e_1_3_2_39_2
e_1_3_2_19_2
e_1_3_2_30_2
e_1_3_2_32_2
e_1_3_2_10_2
e_1_3_2_31_2
e_1_3_2_5_2
e_1_3_2_11_2
e_1_3_2_34_2
e_1_3_2_4_2
e_1_3_2_12_2
e_1_3_2_33_2
e_1_3_2_3_2
e_1_3_2_13_2
e_1_3_2_36_2
e_1_3_2_2_2
e_1_3_2_14_2
e_1_3_2_35_2
References_xml – ident: e_1_3_2_32_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.01242-07
– ident: e_1_3_2_10_2
  doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001
– ident: e_1_3_2_20_2
  doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)00135-S
– ident: e_1_3_2_7_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.00462-08
– ident: e_1_3_2_28_2
  doi: 10.1017/S0950268807009223
– ident: e_1_3_2_21_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02995.x
– ident: e_1_3_2_44_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.038
– ident: e_1_3_2_38_2
  doi: 10.3201/eid1406.071008
– ident: e_1_3_2_9_2
  doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.340-347.2005
– ident: e_1_3_2_37_2
  doi: 10.2307/1593076
– ident: e_1_3_2_18_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03291.x
– ident: e_1_3_2_25_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.010
– ident: e_1_3_2_8_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.02991-05
– ident: e_1_3_2_42_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.1.1-9.2000
– ident: e_1_3_2_22_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.01669-07
– ident: e_1_3_2_27_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.02.012
– ident: e_1_3_2_3_2
  doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-71.2.264
– ident: e_1_3_2_26_2
  doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.11.2810-2814.1997
– ident: e_1_3_2_34_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.00499-09
– ident: e_1_3_2_4_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00845-0
– ident: e_1_3_2_13_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00143-4
– ident: e_1_3_2_40_2
  doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-64.11.1705
– ident: e_1_3_2_24_2
  doi: 10.3201/eid1302.060620
– ident: e_1_3_2_35_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.02.010
– ident: e_1_3_2_15_2
  doi: 10.2307/1592343
– ident: e_1_3_2_23_2
  doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00132
– ident: e_1_3_2_12_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.004
– ident: e_1_3_2_14_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00782.x
– ident: e_1_3_2_11_2
  doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.3.490
– ident: e_1_3_2_31_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.00884-07
– ident: e_1_3_2_2_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02781.x
– ident: e_1_3_2_5_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.09.003
– ident: e_1_3_2_36_2
  doi: 10.1086/597402
– ident: e_1_3_2_19_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00926.x
– ident: e_1_3_2_39_2
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.12.x
– ident: e_1_3_2_6_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.645-652.2006
– ident: e_1_3_2_16_2
  doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-3-30
– ident: e_1_3_2_41_2
  doi: 10.3201/eid1509.080773
– ident: e_1_3_2_29_2
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4343-4351.2003
– ident: e_1_3_2_33_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03759.x
– ident: e_1_3_2_43_2
  doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-6-1171
– ident: e_1_3_2_17_2
  doi: 10.3201/eid1008.040129
– ident: e_1_3_2_30_2
  doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01143.x
SSID ssj0004068
Score 2.270002
Snippet Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies...
Classifications Services AEM Citing Articles Google Scholar PubMed Related Content Social Bookmarking CiteULike Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit...
ABSTRACT Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based...
Improved understanding of the ecology and epidemiology of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment is key to developing appropriate farm-based strategies...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
pubmed
pascalfrancis
highwire
fao
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 98
SubjectTerms Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Campylobacter
Campylobacter - classification
Campylobacter - isolation & purification
Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology
Campylobacter Infections - veterinary
Carrier State - epidemiology
Carrier State - veterinary
Cattle
Chickens
Cluster Analysis
Environmental Microbiology
Epidemiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genotype & phenotype
Gram-negative bacteria
Longitudinal Studies
Microbiology
Molecular Epidemiology
Molecular Typing
Poultry
Public Health Microbiology
Risk assessment
Title Longitudinal Molecular Epidemiological Study of Thermophilic Campylobacters on One Conventional Broiler Chicken Farm
URI http://aem.asm.org/content/77/1/98.abstract
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21037294
https://www.proquest.com/docview/840770980
https://search.proquest.com/docview/821192811
https://search.proquest.com/docview/856772079
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3019741
Volume 77
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELa2KyHggKA8tixUPsAxbeI8bB9XVasVUB6CSnuz7MSGFSSpmvbQf89MEndbhDgg9RQ7tZyZycxkPn9DyBthkjxOnA3AdSUB-FsdmEi4wIFvthIi1ES3aIuP2fUqeXeT3pyR1J-FaUH7ubmdVL_KSXX7o8VWrst86nFi08_LGSglhMHRdEAGoKA-RfeHIcNMeOpJ9Fce7c7E9Gq-nGBlDglNWxbgEItWyYlLGjhdH5EFI1ZSN_C4XNfn4m-B6J94yiMHtXhMHvWRJb3qdvCEnNlqSO51vSb3Q3LfH0FuhuThEQvhU7L9UGPTol2BDbLo0vfLpfO75rEoSYqQwz2tHQXV2pT1Gj_F5BSLF3tkFUHW54bWFf1UWTo7ArNTSPXh3bOhCPv4aSu60JvyGVkt5t9m10HfjCHIUxZugyJjhXEQMME2IcSMjIPYSDpIp4xhzFjOtLBc6MLJNDU8KWKhkV7PGGmKODTxc3Je1ZW9IDSWhWaJtlxrSGZCo3mey1jaPE1d4SI5Im-9PNS649xQba7ChAIRqlaEcGVELkBYSn-H16FafWVYhIV4NI6zDIa8BJVuSqVtqThXkZJiRMYnEj0swWKegnLC3156EaveoBsFeTDnoRQwSg-jYIlYXtGVrXcwBcnymIiif0yBBTgLOWzxRacyd6v3yjgi_ESZDhOQB_x0BMyj5QPvzeHlf995SR50n8rx94qcbzc7-xpira0Zk8H7L2LcWthvTNgpDA
link.rule.ids 230,315,730,783,787,888,27936,27937,53804,53806
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFD7ahtDYA5cyWBkMP8Bj2sS52HkcVasC7UBiRXuz7MSGaSSpennofj3HSd21E0ICqU-xU8vJZ59zcj5_B-AdV1EWRkZ7aLoiD-2t9FTAjWfQNusUPdRI1myLi2Q4iT5dxVd7ELuzMDVpP1PXnfJX0Smvf9bcymmRdR1PrPt13ENQohscdPfhAa5XP3JBujsO6SfciU9ai-X47pR3z_vjjs3NWUnTWgfYt2mraMco7RtZbckFW7aknOMDM02liz-5ovcZlVsmavAEvrvJNcyUm85yoTrZ7T3dx3-e_VN4vHZayXnT_Az2dNmCh00Zy1ULDt3p5nkLjrYEDp_DYlTZekjL3NbeImNXipf07-rSWpAQy2ZckcoQRO2sqKb2K09GbF5kZQVLrKD0nFQl-VJq0tviyZMPswq3tRmxjJIbXZKBnBXHMBn0L3tDb13nwcti6i-8PKG5MuiL4fND7zVQBt2u1GCkphSlSjMquWZc5iaNY8WiPOTSKvcplao89FX4Ag7KqtQnQMI0lzSSmkmJcZKvJMuyNEx1FscmN0HahvfuRYtpI-ch6jCIcoHYEDU28EobThAFQv7AnVZMvlGb30VXNwyTBJscNIScF0LqQjAmApHyNpztQGUzBA1ZjLjHvz112BHrvWIuMMRmzE85tpJNKy5ym7mRpa6W2MXq8FEeBH_pggMw6jOc4ssGi3ejr1HeBraD0k0HKzG-24LYq6XG11h79d93voXD4eV4JEYfLz6fwqPmi7z9vYaDxWyp36BLt1Bn9QL-DbEOSgY
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbYELcHLh1jZTD8AI-5ORfbj6O0GrCOSVBp4sWyExumLUnVtA_l13Oc1F07IR4m5Sl2YsX57HNOzpfvIPSeqSSPE6M9MF2JB_ZWeipixjNgmzUHDzWRLdviLDuZJF8u0ouNUl8taT9Xl351XfrV5e-WWzkt88DxxILz8QBACW5wFEwLE-yg-7Bmw8wF6u6XyDBjToDSWi3HeScsOB6OfZufs7KmrRZwaFNXyZZh2jGy3pAMtoxJ2cCkma7axb_c0dusyg0zNXqGfroH7NgpV_5irvz8zy3txzvNwHP0dOW84uOuywt0T1c99KArZ7nsoUfuL-emh55sCB3uoflpbesiLQpbgwuPXUlePLypT2vBgi2rcYlrgwG9s7Ke2q89Obb5kaUVLrHC0g2uK_yt0niwwZfHH2c1bG8zbJklV7rCIzkrX6LJaPhjcOKt6j14eUrCuVdkpFAGfDKYQ_BiI2XA_eIGIjalCFGaEsk0ZbIwPE0VTYqYSavgpxRXRRyqeB_tVnWlDxCOeSFJIjWVEuKlUEma5zzmOk9TU5iI99EH97LFtJP1EG04RJgAfIgWH3Cmjw4ACUL-gh1XTL4Tm-cFlzeOswyaHDyEbEohdSkoFZHgrI-OtuCyHoLENAX8w20PHX7Eas9oBITalIacQStet8JitxkcWel6AV2sHh9hUfSfLjAAJSGFR3zV4fFm9BXS-4huIXXdwUqNb7cA_lrJ8RXeXt_5ynfo4fmnkTj9fPb1ED3uPszb4w3anc8W-i14dnN11K7hv--NTIY
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Longitudinal+Molecular+Epidemiological+Study+of+Thermophilic+Campylobacters+on+One+Conventional+Broiler+Chicken+Farm&rft.jtitle=Applied+and+environmental+microbiology&rft.au=RIDLEY%2C+Anne+M&rft.au=MORRIS%2C+Victoria+K&rft.au=CAWTHRAW%2C+Shaun+A&rft.au=ELLIS-IVERSEN%2C+Johanne&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.pub=American+Society+for+Microbiology&rft.issn=0099-2240&rft.eissn=1098-5336&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128%2FAEM.01388-10&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=23756750
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0099-2240&client=summon