Regulating medical bodies? The consequences of the ‘modernisation’ of the NHS and the disembodiment of clinical knowledge

The aim of this paper is to explore the consequences of modernisation and regulatory processes for the everyday lives of doctors working the UK National Health Service. We do this by reporting on interview data generated as part of a qualitative investigation into the working lives of 47 doctors. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSociology of health & illness Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 333 - 348
Main Authors Nettleton, Sarah, Burrows, Roger, Watt, Ian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2008
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this paper is to explore the consequences of modernisation and regulatory processes for the everyday lives of doctors working the UK National Health Service. We do this by reporting on interview data generated as part of a qualitative investigation into the working lives of 47 doctors. The analysis of the empirical findings is informed by two literatures: that which has sought to theorise the contemporary thrust of regulation and audit and that which has developed a sociology of embodiment. Doctors’ views are presented in relation to four areas of work which have – in the loosest sense of the word – been subject to regulation. Drawing on work from the sociology of embodiment we argue that changes in the institutional and cultural context of medical work could be altering both the ‘field’ and the ‘habitus’– to use Bourdieu's terms – of medicine, with a consequence that medical knowledge is becoming less embodied.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0141-9889
1467-9566
1467-9566
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01057.x