Randomized, double-blind, multicenter evaluation of pramipexole extended release once daily in early Parkinson's disease

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pramipexole extended release (ER) administered once daily in early Parkinson's disease (PD). Pramipexole immediate release (IR) administered three times daily (TID) is an efficacious and generally well‐tolerated treatment fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMovement disorders Vol. 25; no. 15; pp. 2542 - 2549
Main Authors Hauser, Robert A., Schapira, Anthony H.V., Rascol, Olivier, Barone, Paolo, Mizuno, Yoshikuni, Salin, Laurence, Haaksma, Monika, Juhel, Nolwenn, Poewe, Werner
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 15.11.2010
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pramipexole extended release (ER) administered once daily in early Parkinson's disease (PD). Pramipexole immediate release (IR) administered three times daily (TID) is an efficacious and generally well‐tolerated treatment for PD. A pramipexole ER formulation is now available. We performed a randomized, double‐blind, placebo and active comparator–controlled trial in subjects with early PD. The primary efficacy and safety evaluation of pramipexole ER compared with placebo took place at week 18. Two hundred fifty‐nine subjects were randomized 2:2:1 to treatment with pramipexole ER once daily, pramipexole IR TID, or placebo. Levodopa rescue was required by 7 subjects in the placebo group (14%), 3 subjects in the pramipexole ER group (2.9%, P = 0.0160), and 1 subject in the pramipexole IR group (1.0%, P = 0.0017). Adjusted mean [standard error (SE)] change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II [activities of daily living (ADL)] + III (motor) scores from baseline to week 18, including post‐levodopa rescue evaluations, was −5.1 (1.3) in the placebo group, −8.1 (1.1) in the pramipexole ER group (P = 0.0282), and −8.4 (1.1) in the pramipexole IR group (P = 0.0153). Adjusted mean (SE) change in UPDRS ADL + motor scores, censoring post‐levodopa rescue data, was −2.7 (1.3) in the placebo group, −7.4 (1.1) in the pramipexole ER group (P = 0.0010), and −7.5 (1.1) in the pramipexole IR group (P = 0.0006). Adverse events more common with pramipexole ER than placebo included somnolence, nausea, constipation, and fatigue. Pramipexole ER administered once daily was demonstrated to be efficacious compared with placebo and provided similar efficacy and tolerability as pramipexole IR administered TID. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-307PV21T-F
Potential Conflict of Interest: Drs. Robert Hauser, Anthony Schapira, Olivier Rascol, Paolo Barone, Yoshikuni Mizuno, and Werner Poewe have received financial support to disclose for this study. Drs. Laurence Salin, Monika Haaksma, and Mrs. Nolwenn Juhel are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim.
istex:6D17C7F9698CE3482504E8A130ED82080DB28D0C
Boehringer Ingelheim International
ArticleID:MDS23317
There were no ghost writers and this manuscript complies with the Movement Disorders policy on ghost writing.
American Academy of Neurology (AAN)
Michael Feirtag of the Curry Rockefeller Group, Tarrytown, NY
policy on ghost writing.
Movement Disorders
There were no ghost writers and this manuscript complies with the
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0885-3185
1531-8257
1531-8257
DOI:10.1002/mds.23317