New estimates of CO2 forest emissions and removals: 1990–2015
•We update global GHG forest emissions, including from deforestation and degradation.•Deforestation decreased from 4.0 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Degradation increased from 0.4 to 1.0GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Remaining forests acted as an overall sink of −2.1GtCO2yr−1...
Saved in:
Published in | Forest ecology and management Vol. 352; pp. 89 - 98 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | •We update global GHG forest emissions, including from deforestation and degradation.•Deforestation decreased from 4.0 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Degradation increased from 0.4 to 1.0GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Remaining forests acted as an overall sink of −2.1GtCO2yr−1 over the same period.•The net effect on the atmosphere was net emissions of 0.8GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015.
Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT, on recent trends in global and regional net CO2 emissions and removals from forest land, including from net forest conversion (used as a proxy for deforestation) and forest remaining forest. The new analysis is based on the simplified forest carbon stock method of the FAOSTAT Emissions database, equivalent to a Tier 1, Approach 1 IPCC methodology, limited to biomass carbon stocks. Our results indicated that CO2 emissions from net forest conversion decreased significantly, from an average of 4.0GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. More than half of the estimated reductions over the last five years, some 0.6GtCO2yr−1, took place in Brazil. Detailed analyses further indicated that remaining forests continued to function as a net carbon sink globally, with an average net removal of −2.2GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010, and −2.1GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. Annex I Parties represented the bulk of this sink, contributing 60% of the total in 2011–2015, down from 65% in 2001–2010. Compared to previous FAOSTAT assessments for the period 2001–2010, based on the 2010 FRA and published in the IPCC AR5, the use of FRA 2015 data led to estimates of net forest conversion that were consistent with previous ones (4.0 vs. 3.8GtCO2yr−1), while the estimated forest sinks were 22% larger (−2.2 vs. −1.8GtCO2yr−1). The net contribution of forests to anthropogenic forcing based on FRA2015 data was thus smaller than previously estimated by the IPCC AR5. Finally, we separated for the first time net emissions and removals from forest land into a sink component and a degradation component. Results indicated that, contrary to CO2 emissions from deforestation, CO2 emissions from forest degradation increased significantly, from 0.4GtCO2yr−1 in the 1990s, to 1.1GtCO2yr−1 in 2001–2010 and 1.0GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Emissions from forest degradation were thus one-fourth of those from deforestation in 2001–2010, increasing to one-third in 2011–2015. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT, on recent trends in global and regional net CO2 emissions and removals from forest land, including from net forest conversion (used as a proxy for deforestation) and forest remaining forest. The new analysis is based on the simplified forest carbon stock method of the FAOSTAT Emissions database, equivalent to a Tier 1, Approach 1 IPCC methodology, limited to biomass carbon stocks. Our results indicated that CO2 emissions from net forest conversion decreased significantly, from an average of 4.0GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. More than half of the estimated reductions over the last five years, some 0.6GtCO2yr−1, took place in Brazil. Detailed analyses further indicated that remaining forests continued to function as a net carbon sink globally, with an average net removal of −2.2GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010, and −2.1GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. Annex I Parties represented the bulk of this sink, contributing 60% of the total in 2011–2015, down from 65% in 2001–2010. Compared to previous FAOSTAT assessments for the period 2001–2010, based on the 2010 FRA and published in the IPCC AR5, the use of FRA 2015 data led to estimates of net forest conversion that were consistent with previous ones (4.0 vs. 3.8GtCO2yr−1), while the estimated forest sinks were 22% larger (−2.2 vs. −1.8GtCO2yr−1). The net contribution of forests to anthropogenic forcing based on FRA2015 data was thus smaller than previously estimated by the IPCC AR5. Finally, we separated for the first time net emissions and removals from forest land into a sink component and a degradation component. Results indicated that, contrary to CO2 emissions from deforestation, CO2 emissions from forest degradation increased significantly, from 0.4GtCO2yr−1 in the 1990s, to 1.1GtCO2yr−1 in 2001–2010 and 1.0GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Emissions from forest degradation were thus one-fourth of those from deforestation in 2001–2010, increasing to one-third in 2011–2015. •We update global GHG forest emissions, including from deforestation and degradation.•Deforestation decreased from 4.0 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Degradation increased from 0.4 to 1.0GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Remaining forests acted as an overall sink of −2.1GtCO2yr−1 over the same period.•The net effect on the atmosphere was net emissions of 0.8GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT, on recent trends in global and regional net CO2 emissions and removals from forest land, including from net forest conversion (used as a proxy for deforestation) and forest remaining forest. The new analysis is based on the simplified forest carbon stock method of the FAOSTAT Emissions database, equivalent to a Tier 1, Approach 1 IPCC methodology, limited to biomass carbon stocks. Our results indicated that CO2 emissions from net forest conversion decreased significantly, from an average of 4.0GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. More than half of the estimated reductions over the last five years, some 0.6GtCO2yr−1, took place in Brazil. Detailed analyses further indicated that remaining forests continued to function as a net carbon sink globally, with an average net removal of −2.2GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010, and −2.1GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. Annex I Parties represented the bulk of this sink, contributing 60% of the total in 2011–2015, down from 65% in 2001–2010. Compared to previous FAOSTAT assessments for the period 2001–2010, based on the 2010 FRA and published in the IPCC AR5, the use of FRA 2015 data led to estimates of net forest conversion that were consistent with previous ones (4.0 vs. 3.8GtCO2yr−1), while the estimated forest sinks were 22% larger (−2.2 vs. −1.8GtCO2yr−1). The net contribution of forests to anthropogenic forcing based on FRA2015 data was thus smaller than previously estimated by the IPCC AR5. Finally, we separated for the first time net emissions and removals from forest land into a sink component and a degradation component. Results indicated that, contrary to CO2 emissions from deforestation, CO2 emissions from forest degradation increased significantly, from 0.4GtCO2yr−1 in the 1990s, to 1.1GtCO2yr−1 in 2001–2010 and 1.0GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Emissions from forest degradation were thus one-fourth of those from deforestation in 2001–2010, increasing to one-third in 2011–2015. Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT, on recent trends in global and regional net CO2 emissions and removals from forest land, including from net forest conversion (used as a proxy for deforestation) and forest remaining forest. The new analysis is based on the simplified forest carbon stock method of the FAOSTAT Emissions database, equivalent to a Tier 1, Approach 1 IPCC methodology, limited to biomass carbon stocks. Our results indicated that CO2 emissions from net forest conversion decreased significantly, from an average of 4.0GtCO2 yr-1 during 2001-2010 to 2.9GtCO2 yr-1 during 2011-2015. More than half of the estimated reductions over the last five years, some 0.6GtCO2 yr-1, took place in Brazil. Detailed analyses further indicated that remaining forests continued to function as a net carbon sink globally, with an average net removal of -2.2GtCO2 yr-1 during 2001-2010, and -2.1GtCO2 yr-1 during 2011-2015. Annex I Parties represented the bulk of this sink, contributing 60% of the total in 2011-2015, down from 65% in 2001-2010. Compared to previous FAOSTAT assessments for the period 2001-2010, based on the 2010 FRA and published in the IPCC AR5, the use of FRA 2015 data led to estimates of net forest conversion that were consistent with previous ones (4.0 vs. 3.8GtCO2 yr-1), while the estimated forest sinks were 22% larger (-2.2 vs. -1.8GtCO2 yr-1). The net contribution of forests to anthropogenic forcing based on FRA2015 data was thus smaller than previously estimated by the IPCC AR5. Finally, we separated for the first time net emissions and removals from forest land into a sink component and a degradation component. Results indicated that, contrary to CO2 emissions from deforestation, CO2 emissions from forest degradation increased significantly, from 0.4GtCO2 yr-1 in the 1990s, to 1.1GtCO2 yr-1 in 2001-2010 and 1.0GtCO2 yr-1 in 2011-2015. Emissions from forest degradation were thus one-fourth of those from deforestation in 2001-2010, increasing to one-third in 2011-2015. |
Author | Schmidhuber, Josef Federici, Sandro Tubiello, Francesco N. Salvatore, Mirella Jacobs, Heather |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sandro surname: Federici fullname: Federici, Sandro organization: Climate, Energy and Tenure Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy – sequence: 2 givenname: Francesco N. surname: Tubiello fullname: Tubiello, Francesco N. email: francesco.tubiello@fao.org organization: Climate, Energy and Tenure Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: Mirella surname: Salvatore fullname: Salvatore, Mirella organization: Climate, Energy and Tenure Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy – sequence: 4 givenname: Heather surname: Jacobs fullname: Jacobs, Heather organization: Climate, Energy and Tenure Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy – sequence: 5 givenname: Josef surname: Schmidhuber fullname: Schmidhuber, Josef organization: Statistics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy |
BookMark | eNqNkU1OwzAQhS1UJErhBiyyZJMw_knsdAFCFX9SRTewtoIzkVy1cbHTInbcgRtyEhyFFQvKaqTR996M3jsmo9a1SMgZhYwCLS6WWeM8GpcxoHkGIgPGDsiYKslSCYKNyBi4VCmlTB6R4xCWAJDnQo3J1SO-JRg6u646DIlrktmCJb1d6BJc2xCsa0NStXXice121SpME1qW8PXx2V87IYdN3OHpz5yQ59ubp9l9Ol_cPcyu56nJqexSVLkxtIac8wJeypIzldeCMVMLHpdKcTQMSlaJ3IiCioY2jaBFiYzJeI3zCTkffDfevW7jczr-ZnC1qlp026Cp4kXBgItiPyolcCqZEv9ARaFUJCGi0wE13oXgsdHGdlUX0-l8ZVeagu670Es9dKH7dDQIHbuIYvFLvPExcf--T3Y5yDAmu7PodTAWW4O1jWyna2f_NvgGCcqjag |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0181187 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_16_605_2024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_11_146 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15086436 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13021_019_0119_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11027_019_09885_2 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0226341 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forpol_2016_09_010 crossref_primary_10_22144_ctu_jsi_2021_036 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2019_111423 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_15_2179_2023 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16146089 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_05_036 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_12_1561_2020 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41558_019_0591_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16114775 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2021_112648 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs8070567 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ac358d crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_12_961_2020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2017_05_011 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojf_2016_62013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2019_111496 crossref_primary_10_12944_CWE_18_3_02 crossref_primary_10_32003_igge_990382 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_16370 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_7_349_2015 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41558_018_0283_x crossref_primary_10_1080_17583004_2017_1285178 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_111734 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_13_5213_2021 crossref_primary_10_1080_14693062_2017_1346498 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12183061 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11027_019_09875_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_2016GB005546 crossref_primary_10_4236_oje_2018_81005 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43016_021_00225_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jag_2021_102532 crossref_primary_10_24054_raaas_v14i1_2750 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2022_109829 crossref_primary_10_21829_myb_2020_2611891 crossref_primary_10_3390_f10111004 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12203351 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14225734 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2018_03_016 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenrg_2023_1245820 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrs_2018_04_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture7020014 crossref_primary_10_1038_nclimate2892 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_15_2025_2023 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11629_019_5968_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2017_06_037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_121827 crossref_primary_10_1038_nclimate3227 crossref_primary_10_1080_15481603_2022_2127459 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolecon_2019_106513 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_13_2363_2021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeog_2018_12_008 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenrg_2023_1319915 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jag_2016_06_020 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12111790 crossref_primary_10_3917_recma_347_0077 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_15_4295_2023 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_8_605_2016 crossref_primary_10_1080_15481603_2020_1731108 crossref_primary_10_3390_f13020285 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_aaw9256 crossref_primary_10_3389_frsen_2024_1416550 crossref_primary_10_3390_su151813570 crossref_primary_10_3390_f8080291 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11027_023_10096_z crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_13_1681_2021 crossref_primary_10_1080_13467581_2023_2238045 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs11040463 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_13_5799_2016 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_024_01748_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_120755 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13021_016_0065_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13040809 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_53432_2 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0177552 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_11_7_074011 crossref_primary_10_1029_2019EF001190 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_023_29784_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envc_2021_100123 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envc_2021_100170 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11842_020_09464_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfe_2016_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_06_013 crossref_primary_10_17159_sajs_2020_6339 crossref_primary_10_51451_np_v16i4_465 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14225773 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2023_108758 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2020_e03802 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_13_4253_2016 crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_8_571_2016 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2022_1018762 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2024_1434214 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_117990 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2018_07_068 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_10_10_101002 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10010068 |
Cites_doi | 10.5194/bg-9-5125-2012 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.006 10.1111/gcb.12865 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7ST 7U6 C1K SOI 8FD FR3 KR7 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Environment Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Civil Engineering Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Technology Research Database Civil Engineering Abstracts Engineering Research Database AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA Technology Research Database Ecology Abstracts |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology Forestry |
EISSN | 1872-7042 |
EndPage | 98 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_foreco_2015_04_022 S0378112715002443 |
GeographicLocations | ASW, Brazil Brazil |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: ASW, Brazil – name: Brazil |
GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 0SF 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 6I. 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AABVA AACTN AAEDW AAFTH AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AATLK AAXUO ABFNM ABFRF ABFYP ABGRD ABJNI ABLST ABMAC ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIUM ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADQTV AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEQOU AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKIFW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AXJTR BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CBWCG CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA IHE J1W KCYFY KOM LW9 LY9 M41 MO0 N9A NCXOZ N~3 O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 RIG ROL RPZ SAB SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SPCBC SSA SSJ SSZ T5K WH7 Y6R ~02 ~G- ~KM 29H AAEDT AAHBH AALCJ AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ABXDB ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEGFY AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AI. AIDBO AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BNPGV CITATION FEDTE FGOYB G-2 HLV HMC HVGLF HZ~ R2- SEN SEW SSH VH1 WUQ ZKB ZY4 7SN 7ST 7U6 C1K SOI 8FD FR3 KR7 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-e85cc1d053360b993285d422cd43053883ec2092a45c4614f1ff4169e22719933 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0378-1127 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 06:16:10 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:00:03 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 23:09:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:34:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:04 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:32:28 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Deforestation Forest degradation FRA CO2 emissions REDD CO2 removals FAOSTAT Forest Carbon Stock change |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c517t-e85cc1d053360b993285d422cd43053883ec2092a45c4614f1ff4169e22719933 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112715002443 |
PQID | 1746882840 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1836620346 proquest_miscellaneous_1770317284 proquest_miscellaneous_1746882840 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_04_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_04_022 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_04_022 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20150901 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2015 text: 20150901 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | Forest ecology and management |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
References | FAOSTAT, 2015. FAOSTAT online database at Tubiello, Salvatore, Ferrara, House, Federici, Rossi, Biancalani, Condor Golec, Jacobs, Flammini, Prosperi, Cardenas-Galindo, Schmidhuber, Sanz Sanchez, Srivastava, Smith (b0060) 2015 MacDicken, K.G., 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: What, why and how? Forest Ecology and Management. 352, 3–8. FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome FAO, 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks: 1990–2011 Analysis. FAO Statistics Division Working Paper Series, 14/01. UN FAO, Rome, Italy Houghton, House, Pongratz, van der Werf, DeFries, Hansen, Le Quéré, Ramankutty (b0030) 2012; 9 Smith, P., Bustamante, M., Ahammad, H., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E.A., Haberl, H., Harper, R., House, J., Jafari, M., Masera, O., Mbow, C., Ravindranath, N.H., Rice, C.W., Robledo Abad, C., Romanovskaya, A., Sperling, F., Tubiello, F., 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C., (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., (Eds), IGES, Hayama, Japan . Tubiello (10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0060) 2015 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0025 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0015 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0010 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0055 Houghton (10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0030) 2012; 9 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b9010 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0040 |
References_xml | – reference: FAO, 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks: 1990–2011 Analysis. FAO Statistics Division Working Paper Series, 14/01. UN FAO, Rome, Italy, < – volume: 9 start-page: 5125 year: 2012 end-page: 5142 ident: b0030 article-title: Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change publication-title: Biogeosciences – reference: FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome, < – reference: FAOSTAT, 2015. FAOSTAT online database at < – reference: IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., (Eds), IGES, Hayama, Japan, < – reference: MacDicken, K.G., 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: What, why and how? Forest Ecology and Management. 352, 3–8. – reference: Smith, P., Bustamante, M., Ahammad, H., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E.A., Haberl, H., Harper, R., House, J., Jafari, M., Masera, O., Mbow, C., Ravindranath, N.H., Rice, C.W., Robledo Abad, C., Romanovskaya, A., Sperling, F., Tubiello, F., 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C., (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. – reference: >. – year: 2015 ident: b0060 article-title: The contribution of agriculture, forestry and other land use activities to global warming, 1990–2012 publication-title: Glob. Change Biol. – volume: 9 start-page: 5125 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0030 article-title: Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change publication-title: Biogeosciences doi: 10.5194/bg-9-5125-2012 – ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0010 – ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0015 – ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0040 – ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0025 – ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0055 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.006 – ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b9010 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0060 article-title: The contribution of agriculture, forestry and other land use activities to global warming, 1990–2012 publication-title: Glob. Change Biol. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12865 |
SSID | ssj0005548 |
Score | 2.5006819 |
Snippet | •We update global GHG forest emissions, including from deforestation and degradation.•Deforestation decreased from 4.0 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to... Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT,... |
SourceID | proquest crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 89 |
SubjectTerms | anthropogenic activities Assessments biomass Brazil Carbon Carbon dioxide carbon sinks CO2 emissions CO2 removals Conversion Deforestation Degradation Emission analysis FAOSTAT Forest Forest degradation forest resources Forests FRA greenhouse gas emissions REDD Stock change |
Title | New estimates of CO2 forest emissions and removals: 1990–2015 |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1746882840 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1770317284 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1836620346 |
Volume | 352 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8NAEF5KRfEiPvFZVvAam-wjm3qRUixVUQ9a8LZsNhuo2ERsPXgR_4P_0F_iTB6ighY8JpnA8GWYx2bmG0IOjFDOBSzw0tgYTxgwY6O48hKBh06hskGCB_oXl-FgKM5u5W2D9OpZGGyrrHx_6dMLb13daVdoth9Go_a1z3FKkilIaSDQCGT8FEKhlR--fGnzkMUGLRT2ULoenyt6vCAvhCIPG7xkQXjK2G_h6YejLqJPf5ksVWkj7ZaarZCGy1bJfLlI8nmVLOCGTVzbtkaOwW1RpM4YYxZJ85T2rhhNi-cUl7vh8diEmiyhj26cg6FNjmgA0eL99Q01XCfD_slNb-BVWxI8KwM19VwkLSCKM7WhH0O6wSKZCMZsgmxePIq4s8zvMCOkFRCM0yBNIQvrOAbQgTjfIM0sz9wmoUGqpAEXmHSYFSwOTWq4jfxOJJkJbOxvEV6Do21FIY6bLO513St2p0tINSqsfaEB0i3ifb71UFJozJBXNe76mylo8PIz3tyvP5MGPPHXh8lc_jTRUHeFUEtANfuXDHL5KxD6QybiYch8LsLtf2u5QxbxqmxU2yXN6eOT24PMZhq3CtNtkbnu6fng8gOAe_SG |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEB5Sm7a5hNRtqPPqBnoVlvahlXsJxiQ4DzuHOJDbslqtICGRQ-wceut_6D_sL-mMHikNxIZcpVkYPg3fzKzmAfDdSu19xKMgT60NpEUztlroIJN06RRrF2V0oT-exKMreXqtrtdg2PTCUFllzf0Vp5dsXT_p1Wj2Hm5uepehoC5JrjGkQUcjxTto03Qq1YL24ORsNPlX6aHKJVokH9CBpoOuLPPC0BDzPKrxUuXMU85f81AvuLp0QMebsFFHjmxQKfcJ1nzRgffVLsmfHfhASzZpc9tnOETmYjQ9454CSTbL2fCCs7x8z2i_G92QzZktMvbo72doa_MfLEKH8efXb9LwC1wdH02Ho6BelBA4FelF4BPlEFRqq43DFCMOnqhMcu4yGuglkkR4x8M-t1I5if44j_IcA7G-54geiostaBWzwn8FFuVaWWTBrM-d5GlscytcEvYTxW3k0rALogHHuHqKOC2zuDNNuditqSA1pLAJpUFIuxA8n3qopmiskNcN7uY_azBI9CtOHjSfySCe9PfDFn72NDeYesWYTmBCu0yGxvlrFFoik4g45qGQ8fabtfwGH0fT8bk5P5mc7cA6vanq1nahtXh88nsY6CzS_dqQ_wLpyfc3 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New+estimates+of+CO2+forest+emissions+and+removals%3A+1990%E2%80%932015&rft.jtitle=Forest+ecology+and+management&rft.au=Federici%2C+Sandro&rft.au=Tubiello%2C+Francesco+N.&rft.au=Salvatore%2C+Mirella&rft.au=Jacobs%2C+Heather&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.volume=352&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=98&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.foreco.2015.04.022&rft.externalDocID=S0378112715002443 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon |