New estimates of CO2 forest emissions and removals: 1990–2015

•We update global GHG forest emissions, including from deforestation and degradation.•Deforestation decreased from 4.0 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Degradation increased from 0.4 to 1.0GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Remaining forests acted as an overall sink of −2.1GtCO2yr−1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForest ecology and management Vol. 352; pp. 89 - 98
Main Authors Federici, Sandro, Tubiello, Francesco N., Salvatore, Mirella, Jacobs, Heather, Schmidhuber, Josef
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract •We update global GHG forest emissions, including from deforestation and degradation.•Deforestation decreased from 4.0 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Degradation increased from 0.4 to 1.0GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Remaining forests acted as an overall sink of −2.1GtCO2yr−1 over the same period.•The net effect on the atmosphere was net emissions of 0.8GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT, on recent trends in global and regional net CO2 emissions and removals from forest land, including from net forest conversion (used as a proxy for deforestation) and forest remaining forest. The new analysis is based on the simplified forest carbon stock method of the FAOSTAT Emissions database, equivalent to a Tier 1, Approach 1 IPCC methodology, limited to biomass carbon stocks. Our results indicated that CO2 emissions from net forest conversion decreased significantly, from an average of 4.0GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. More than half of the estimated reductions over the last five years, some 0.6GtCO2yr−1, took place in Brazil. Detailed analyses further indicated that remaining forests continued to function as a net carbon sink globally, with an average net removal of −2.2GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010, and −2.1GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. Annex I Parties represented the bulk of this sink, contributing 60% of the total in 2011–2015, down from 65% in 2001–2010. Compared to previous FAOSTAT assessments for the period 2001–2010, based on the 2010 FRA and published in the IPCC AR5, the use of FRA 2015 data led to estimates of net forest conversion that were consistent with previous ones (4.0 vs. 3.8GtCO2yr−1), while the estimated forest sinks were 22% larger (−2.2 vs. −1.8GtCO2yr−1). The net contribution of forests to anthropogenic forcing based on FRA2015 data was thus smaller than previously estimated by the IPCC AR5. Finally, we separated for the first time net emissions and removals from forest land into a sink component and a degradation component. Results indicated that, contrary to CO2 emissions from deforestation, CO2 emissions from forest degradation increased significantly, from 0.4GtCO2yr−1 in the 1990s, to 1.1GtCO2yr−1 in 2001–2010 and 1.0GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Emissions from forest degradation were thus one-fourth of those from deforestation in 2001–2010, increasing to one-third in 2011–2015.
AbstractList Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT, on recent trends in global and regional net CO2 emissions and removals from forest land, including from net forest conversion (used as a proxy for deforestation) and forest remaining forest. The new analysis is based on the simplified forest carbon stock method of the FAOSTAT Emissions database, equivalent to a Tier 1, Approach 1 IPCC methodology, limited to biomass carbon stocks. Our results indicated that CO2 emissions from net forest conversion decreased significantly, from an average of 4.0GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. More than half of the estimated reductions over the last five years, some 0.6GtCO2yr−1, took place in Brazil. Detailed analyses further indicated that remaining forests continued to function as a net carbon sink globally, with an average net removal of −2.2GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010, and −2.1GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. Annex I Parties represented the bulk of this sink, contributing 60% of the total in 2011–2015, down from 65% in 2001–2010. Compared to previous FAOSTAT assessments for the period 2001–2010, based on the 2010 FRA and published in the IPCC AR5, the use of FRA 2015 data led to estimates of net forest conversion that were consistent with previous ones (4.0 vs. 3.8GtCO2yr−1), while the estimated forest sinks were 22% larger (−2.2 vs. −1.8GtCO2yr−1). The net contribution of forests to anthropogenic forcing based on FRA2015 data was thus smaller than previously estimated by the IPCC AR5. Finally, we separated for the first time net emissions and removals from forest land into a sink component and a degradation component. Results indicated that, contrary to CO2 emissions from deforestation, CO2 emissions from forest degradation increased significantly, from 0.4GtCO2yr−1 in the 1990s, to 1.1GtCO2yr−1 in 2001–2010 and 1.0GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Emissions from forest degradation were thus one-fourth of those from deforestation in 2001–2010, increasing to one-third in 2011–2015.
•We update global GHG forest emissions, including from deforestation and degradation.•Deforestation decreased from 4.0 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Degradation increased from 0.4 to 1.0GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to 2011–2015.•Remaining forests acted as an overall sink of −2.1GtCO2yr−1 over the same period.•The net effect on the atmosphere was net emissions of 0.8GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT, on recent trends in global and regional net CO2 emissions and removals from forest land, including from net forest conversion (used as a proxy for deforestation) and forest remaining forest. The new analysis is based on the simplified forest carbon stock method of the FAOSTAT Emissions database, equivalent to a Tier 1, Approach 1 IPCC methodology, limited to biomass carbon stocks. Our results indicated that CO2 emissions from net forest conversion decreased significantly, from an average of 4.0GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. More than half of the estimated reductions over the last five years, some 0.6GtCO2yr−1, took place in Brazil. Detailed analyses further indicated that remaining forests continued to function as a net carbon sink globally, with an average net removal of −2.2GtCO2yr−1 during 2001–2010, and −2.1GtCO2yr−1 during 2011–2015. Annex I Parties represented the bulk of this sink, contributing 60% of the total in 2011–2015, down from 65% in 2001–2010. Compared to previous FAOSTAT assessments for the period 2001–2010, based on the 2010 FRA and published in the IPCC AR5, the use of FRA 2015 data led to estimates of net forest conversion that were consistent with previous ones (4.0 vs. 3.8GtCO2yr−1), while the estimated forest sinks were 22% larger (−2.2 vs. −1.8GtCO2yr−1). The net contribution of forests to anthropogenic forcing based on FRA2015 data was thus smaller than previously estimated by the IPCC AR5. Finally, we separated for the first time net emissions and removals from forest land into a sink component and a degradation component. Results indicated that, contrary to CO2 emissions from deforestation, CO2 emissions from forest degradation increased significantly, from 0.4GtCO2yr−1 in the 1990s, to 1.1GtCO2yr−1 in 2001–2010 and 1.0GtCO2yr−1 in 2011–2015. Emissions from forest degradation were thus one-fourth of those from deforestation in 2001–2010, increasing to one-third in 2011–2015.
Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT, on recent trends in global and regional net CO2 emissions and removals from forest land, including from net forest conversion (used as a proxy for deforestation) and forest remaining forest. The new analysis is based on the simplified forest carbon stock method of the FAOSTAT Emissions database, equivalent to a Tier 1, Approach 1 IPCC methodology, limited to biomass carbon stocks. Our results indicated that CO2 emissions from net forest conversion decreased significantly, from an average of 4.0GtCO2 yr-1 during 2001-2010 to 2.9GtCO2 yr-1 during 2011-2015. More than half of the estimated reductions over the last five years, some 0.6GtCO2 yr-1, took place in Brazil. Detailed analyses further indicated that remaining forests continued to function as a net carbon sink globally, with an average net removal of -2.2GtCO2 yr-1 during 2001-2010, and -2.1GtCO2 yr-1 during 2011-2015. Annex I Parties represented the bulk of this sink, contributing 60% of the total in 2011-2015, down from 65% in 2001-2010. Compared to previous FAOSTAT assessments for the period 2001-2010, based on the 2010 FRA and published in the IPCC AR5, the use of FRA 2015 data led to estimates of net forest conversion that were consistent with previous ones (4.0 vs. 3.8GtCO2 yr-1), while the estimated forest sinks were 22% larger (-2.2 vs. -1.8GtCO2 yr-1). The net contribution of forests to anthropogenic forcing based on FRA2015 data was thus smaller than previously estimated by the IPCC AR5. Finally, we separated for the first time net emissions and removals from forest land into a sink component and a degradation component. Results indicated that, contrary to CO2 emissions from deforestation, CO2 emissions from forest degradation increased significantly, from 0.4GtCO2 yr-1 in the 1990s, to 1.1GtCO2 yr-1 in 2001-2010 and 1.0GtCO2 yr-1 in 2011-2015. Emissions from forest degradation were thus one-fourth of those from deforestation in 2001-2010, increasing to one-third in 2011-2015.
Author Schmidhuber, Josef
Federici, Sandro
Tubiello, Francesco N.
Salvatore, Mirella
Jacobs, Heather
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sandro
  surname: Federici
  fullname: Federici, Sandro
  organization: Climate, Energy and Tenure Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Francesco N.
  surname: Tubiello
  fullname: Tubiello, Francesco N.
  email: francesco.tubiello@fao.org
  organization: Climate, Energy and Tenure Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mirella
  surname: Salvatore
  fullname: Salvatore, Mirella
  organization: Climate, Energy and Tenure Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Heather
  surname: Jacobs
  fullname: Jacobs, Heather
  organization: Climate, Energy and Tenure Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Josef
  surname: Schmidhuber
  fullname: Schmidhuber, Josef
  organization: Statistics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00153, Italy
BookMark eNqNkU1OwzAQhS1UJErhBiyyZJMw_knsdAFCFX9SRTewtoIzkVy1cbHTInbcgRtyEhyFFQvKaqTR996M3jsmo9a1SMgZhYwCLS6WWeM8GpcxoHkGIgPGDsiYKslSCYKNyBi4VCmlTB6R4xCWAJDnQo3J1SO-JRg6u646DIlrktmCJb1d6BJc2xCsa0NStXXice121SpME1qW8PXx2V87IYdN3OHpz5yQ59ubp9l9Ol_cPcyu56nJqexSVLkxtIac8wJeypIzldeCMVMLHpdKcTQMSlaJ3IiCioY2jaBFiYzJeI3zCTkffDfevW7jczr-ZnC1qlp026Cp4kXBgItiPyolcCqZEv9ARaFUJCGi0wE13oXgsdHGdlUX0-l8ZVeagu670Es9dKH7dDQIHbuIYvFLvPExcf--T3Y5yDAmu7PodTAWW4O1jWyna2f_NvgGCcqjag
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0181187
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_16_605_2024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_11_146
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15086436
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13021_019_0119_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11027_019_09885_2
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0226341
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forpol_2016_09_010
crossref_primary_10_22144_ctu_jsi_2021_036
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2019_111423
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_15_2179_2023
crossref_primary_10_3390_su16146089
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_05_036
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_12_1561_2020
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41558_019_0591_9
crossref_primary_10_3390_su16114775
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2021_112648
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs8070567
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ac358d
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_12_961_2020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2017_05_011
crossref_primary_10_4236_ojf_2016_62013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rse_2019_111496
crossref_primary_10_12944_CWE_18_3_02
crossref_primary_10_32003_igge_990382
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_16370
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_7_349_2015
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41558_018_0283_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_17583004_2017_1285178
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2024_111734
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_13_5213_2021
crossref_primary_10_1080_14693062_2017_1346498
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12183061
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11027_019_09875_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_2016GB005546
crossref_primary_10_4236_oje_2018_81005
crossref_primary_10_1038_s43016_021_00225_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jag_2021_102532
crossref_primary_10_24054_raaas_v14i1_2750
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2022_109829
crossref_primary_10_21829_myb_2020_2611891
crossref_primary_10_3390_f10111004
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12203351
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14225734
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2018_03_016
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenrg_2023_1245820
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrs_2018_04_004
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture7020014
crossref_primary_10_1038_nclimate2892
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_15_2025_2023
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11629_019_5968_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2017_06_037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_121827
crossref_primary_10_1038_nclimate3227
crossref_primary_10_1080_15481603_2022_2127459
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolecon_2019_106513
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_13_2363_2021
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeog_2018_12_008
crossref_primary_10_3389_fenrg_2023_1319915
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jag_2016_06_020
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs12111790
crossref_primary_10_3917_recma_347_0077
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_15_4295_2023
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_8_605_2016
crossref_primary_10_1080_15481603_2020_1731108
crossref_primary_10_3390_f13020285
crossref_primary_10_1126_science_aaw9256
crossref_primary_10_3389_frsen_2024_1416550
crossref_primary_10_3390_su151813570
crossref_primary_10_3390_f8080291
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11027_023_10096_z
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_13_1681_2021
crossref_primary_10_1080_13467581_2023_2238045
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs11040463
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_13_5799_2016
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_024_01748_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_120755
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13021_016_0065_6
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13040809
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_53432_2
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0177552
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_11_7_074011
crossref_primary_10_1029_2019EF001190
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_023_29784_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envc_2021_100123
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_06_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envc_2021_100170
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11842_020_09464_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfe_2016_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_06_013
crossref_primary_10_17159_sajs_2020_6339
crossref_primary_10_51451_np_v16i4_465
crossref_primary_10_3390_rs14225773
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2023_108758
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2020_e03802
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_13_4253_2016
crossref_primary_10_5194_essd_8_571_2016
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2022_1018762
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2024_1434214
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_117990
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2018_07_068
crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_10_10_101002
crossref_primary_10_3390_land10010068
Cites_doi 10.5194/bg-9-5125-2012
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.006
10.1111/gcb.12865
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
7SN
7ST
7U6
C1K
SOI
8FD
FR3
KR7
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Ecology Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Environment Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Civil Engineering Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Ecology Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Technology Research Database
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA

Technology Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
Forestry
EISSN 1872-7042
EndPage 98
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_foreco_2015_04_022
S0378112715002443
GeographicLocations ASW, Brazil
Brazil
GeographicLocations_xml – name: ASW, Brazil
– name: Brazil
GroupedDBID --K
--M
.~1
0R~
0SF
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
6I.
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AABVA
AACTN
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATLK
AAXUO
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABFYP
ABGRD
ABJNI
ABLST
ABMAC
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADQTV
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHEUO
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AKIFW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLECG
BLXMC
CBWCG
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
IHE
J1W
KCYFY
KOM
LW9
LY9
M41
MO0
N9A
NCXOZ
N~3
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAB
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SPCBC
SSA
SSJ
SSZ
T5K
WH7
Y6R
~02
~G-
~KM
29H
AAEDT
AAHBH
AALCJ
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEGFY
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AI.
AIDBO
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BNPGV
CITATION
FEDTE
FGOYB
G-2
HLV
HMC
HVGLF
HZ~
R2-
SEN
SEW
SSH
VH1
WUQ
ZKB
ZY4
7SN
7ST
7U6
C1K
SOI
8FD
FR3
KR7
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-e85cc1d053360b993285d422cd43053883ec2092a45c4614f1ff4169e22719933
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0378-1127
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 06:16:10 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 00:00:03 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 23:09:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:34:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:04 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:32:28 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Deforestation
Forest degradation
FRA
CO2 emissions
REDD
CO2 removals
FAOSTAT
Forest
Carbon
Stock change
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c517t-e85cc1d053360b993285d422cd43053883ec2092a45c4614f1ff4169e22719933
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112715002443
PQID 1746882840
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1836620346
proquest_miscellaneous_1770317284
proquest_miscellaneous_1746882840
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_04_022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_04_022
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_foreco_2015_04_022
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20150901
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2015
  text: 20150901
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Forest ecology and management
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
References FAOSTAT, 2015. FAOSTAT online database at
Tubiello, Salvatore, Ferrara, House, Federici, Rossi, Biancalani, Condor Golec, Jacobs, Flammini, Prosperi, Cardenas-Galindo, Schmidhuber, Sanz Sanchez, Srivastava, Smith (b0060) 2015
MacDicken, K.G., 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: What, why and how? Forest Ecology and Management. 352, 3–8.
FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome
FAO, 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks: 1990–2011 Analysis. FAO Statistics Division Working Paper Series, 14/01. UN FAO, Rome, Italy
Houghton, House, Pongratz, van der Werf, DeFries, Hansen, Le Quéré, Ramankutty (b0030) 2012; 9
Smith, P., Bustamante, M., Ahammad, H., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E.A., Haberl, H., Harper, R., House, J., Jafari, M., Masera, O., Mbow, C., Ravindranath, N.H., Rice, C.W., Robledo Abad, C., Romanovskaya, A., Sperling, F., Tubiello, F., 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C., (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., (Eds), IGES, Hayama, Japan
.
Tubiello (10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0060) 2015
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0025
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0015
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0010
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0055
Houghton (10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0030) 2012; 9
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b9010
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0040
References_xml – reference: FAO, 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks: 1990–2011 Analysis. FAO Statistics Division Working Paper Series, 14/01. UN FAO, Rome, Italy, <
– volume: 9
  start-page: 5125
  year: 2012
  end-page: 5142
  ident: b0030
  article-title: Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change
  publication-title: Biogeosciences
– reference: FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome, <
– reference: FAOSTAT, 2015. FAOSTAT online database at <
– reference: IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., (Eds), IGES, Hayama, Japan, <
– reference: MacDicken, K.G., 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: What, why and how? Forest Ecology and Management. 352, 3–8.
– reference: Smith, P., Bustamante, M., Ahammad, H., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E.A., Haberl, H., Harper, R., House, J., Jafari, M., Masera, O., Mbow, C., Ravindranath, N.H., Rice, C.W., Robledo Abad, C., Romanovskaya, A., Sperling, F., Tubiello, F., 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C., (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
– reference: >.
– year: 2015
  ident: b0060
  article-title: The contribution of agriculture, forestry and other land use activities to global warming, 1990–2012
  publication-title: Glob. Change Biol.
– volume: 9
  start-page: 5125
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0030
  article-title: Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change
  publication-title: Biogeosciences
  doi: 10.5194/bg-9-5125-2012
– ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0010
– ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0015
– ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0040
– ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0025
– ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0055
  doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.006
– ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b9010
– year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022_b0060
  article-title: The contribution of agriculture, forestry and other land use activities to global warming, 1990–2012
  publication-title: Glob. Change Biol.
  doi: 10.1111/gcb.12865
SSID ssj0005548
Score 2.5006819
Snippet •We update global GHG forest emissions, including from deforestation and degradation.•Deforestation decreased from 4.0 to 2.9GtCO2yr−1 from 1991–2000 to...
Using newly available data from the 2015 Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), we refined the information, currently available through the IPCC AR5 and FAOSTAT,...
SourceID proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 89
SubjectTerms anthropogenic activities
Assessments
biomass
Brazil
Carbon
Carbon dioxide
carbon sinks
CO2 emissions
CO2 removals
Conversion
Deforestation
Degradation
Emission analysis
FAOSTAT
Forest
Forest degradation
forest resources
Forests
FRA
greenhouse gas emissions
REDD
Stock change
Title New estimates of CO2 forest emissions and removals: 1990–2015
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1746882840
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1770317284
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1836620346
Volume 352
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8NAEF5KRfEiPvFZVvAam-wjm3qRUixVUQ9a8LZsNhuo2ERsPXgR_4P_0F_iTB6ighY8JpnA8GWYx2bmG0IOjFDOBSzw0tgYTxgwY6O48hKBh06hskGCB_oXl-FgKM5u5W2D9OpZGGyrrHx_6dMLb13daVdoth9Go_a1z3FKkilIaSDQCGT8FEKhlR--fGnzkMUGLRT2ULoenyt6vCAvhCIPG7xkQXjK2G_h6YejLqJPf5ksVWkj7ZaarZCGy1bJfLlI8nmVLOCGTVzbtkaOwW1RpM4YYxZJ85T2rhhNi-cUl7vh8diEmiyhj26cg6FNjmgA0eL99Q01XCfD_slNb-BVWxI8KwM19VwkLSCKM7WhH0O6wSKZCMZsgmxePIq4s8zvMCOkFRCM0yBNIQvrOAbQgTjfIM0sz9wmoUGqpAEXmHSYFSwOTWq4jfxOJJkJbOxvEV6Do21FIY6bLO513St2p0tINSqsfaEB0i3ifb71UFJozJBXNe76mylo8PIz3tyvP5MGPPHXh8lc_jTRUHeFUEtANfuXDHL5KxD6QybiYch8LsLtf2u5QxbxqmxU2yXN6eOT24PMZhq3CtNtkbnu6fng8gOAe_SG
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEB5Sm7a5hNRtqPPqBnoVlvahlXsJxiQ4DzuHOJDbslqtICGRQ-wceut_6D_sL-mMHikNxIZcpVkYPg3fzKzmAfDdSu19xKMgT60NpEUztlroIJN06RRrF2V0oT-exKMreXqtrtdg2PTCUFllzf0Vp5dsXT_p1Wj2Hm5uepehoC5JrjGkQUcjxTto03Qq1YL24ORsNPlX6aHKJVokH9CBpoOuLPPC0BDzPKrxUuXMU85f81AvuLp0QMebsFFHjmxQKfcJ1nzRgffVLsmfHfhASzZpc9tnOETmYjQ9454CSTbL2fCCs7x8z2i_G92QzZktMvbo72doa_MfLEKH8efXb9LwC1wdH02Ho6BelBA4FelF4BPlEFRqq43DFCMOnqhMcu4yGuglkkR4x8M-t1I5if44j_IcA7G-54geiostaBWzwn8FFuVaWWTBrM-d5GlscytcEvYTxW3k0rALogHHuHqKOC2zuDNNuditqSA1pLAJpUFIuxA8n3qopmiskNcN7uY_azBI9CtOHjSfySCe9PfDFn72NDeYesWYTmBCu0yGxvlrFFoik4g45qGQ8fabtfwGH0fT8bk5P5mc7cA6vanq1nahtXh88nsY6CzS_dqQ_wLpyfc3
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New+estimates+of+CO2+forest+emissions+and+removals%3A+1990%E2%80%932015&rft.jtitle=Forest+ecology+and+management&rft.au=Federici%2C+Sandro&rft.au=Tubiello%2C+Francesco+N.&rft.au=Salvatore%2C+Mirella&rft.au=Jacobs%2C+Heather&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.volume=352&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=98&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.foreco.2015.04.022&rft.externalDocID=S0378112715002443
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0378-1127&client=summon