Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation with motor control exercise can improve lumbar multifidus activation in individuals with recurrent low back pain

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 14815
• Main Authors: Songjaroen, Sranya, Sungnak, Panakorn, Piriyaprasarth, Pagamas, Wang, Hsing-Kuo, Laskin, James J., Wattananon, Peemongkon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 20.07.2021; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 692/700/565/411; 692/700/565/491; Back pain; Contraction; Electrical stimuli; Humanities and Social Sciences; Low back pain; Motor task performance; Motor units; multidisciplinary; Muscle contraction; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Science; Science (multidisciplinary)
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94402-2

Motor control exercise (MCE) is commonly prescribed for patients with low back pain. Although MCE can improve clinical outcomes, lumbar multifidus muscle (LM) activation remains unchanged. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be used to re-activate motor units prior to MCE which should result in increased LM activation. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the immediate effects of NMES combined with MCE on LM activation and motor performance. Twenty-five participants without low back pain (NoLBP) and 35 participants with movement control impairment (MCI) were recruited. Participants with MCI were further randomized to combined NMES with MCE (COMB) or sham-NMES with MCE (MCE) group. Ultrasound imaging was used to measure LM thickness at rest, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and NMES with MVIC. These data were used to calculate LM activation. Quadruped rocking backward was used to represent motor performance. LM activation and motor performance were measured at baseline and after one-session of intervention. Results showed that both COMB and MCE groups had significantly lower ( P  < 0.05) LM activation compared with NoLBP group at baseline. Additionally, both COMB and MCE groups demonstrated significant improvement ( P  < 0.05) in motor performance while COMB group demonstrated significantly greater improvement ( P  < 0.05) in LM activation compared with MCE group. Individuals with MCI still have persisting LM activation deficit. Our key findings suggest that combined NMES and MCE may have better ability to improve LM activation in individuals with MCI. These findings would support the utility of NMES to induce a priming effect before MCE.