Association between myopia and relative peripheral refraction in children with monocular Tilted disc syndrome

This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hosp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC ophthalmology Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 275 - 9
Main Authors Wang, Jiawei, Zhang, Shangzhu, Jiang, Huijun, Duan, Jialiang, Xi, Ruijie, Wang, Shaoyi, Wang, Jiangnan, Chai, Song
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 07.05.2025
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.
AbstractList BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.MethodsThis single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5–17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of − 3.24 D and − 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson’s correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.ResultsTilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (− 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and − 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).ConclusionsPediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.
Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Methods This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5–17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of − 3.24 D and − 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson’s correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Results Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (− 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and − 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Conclusions Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.
This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.
This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.
This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.BACKGROUNDThis study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.METHODSThis single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).RESULTSTilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.CONCLUSIONSPediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.
Background This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Methods This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Results Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Conclusions Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia. Keywords: Myopia, Optic disc, Pediatric patients, Refractive error, Visual acuity
ArticleNumber 275
Audience Academic
Author Wang, Jiangnan
Jiang, Huijun
Chai, Song
Wang, Jiawei
Zhang, Shangzhu
Duan, Jialiang
Wang, Shaoyi
Xi, Ruijie
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jiawei
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Jiawei
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Shangzhu
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Shangzhu
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Huijun
  surname: Jiang
  fullname: Jiang, Huijun
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jialiang
  surname: Duan
  fullname: Duan, Jialiang
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ruijie
  surname: Xi
  fullname: Xi, Ruijie
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Shaoyi
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Shaoyi
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jiangnan
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Jiangnan
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Song
  surname: Chai
  fullname: Chai, Song
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40335954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkk1v1DAQhiNURD_gD3BAkbhwSfF3nBNaVUArVeJSzpY_JrteJfZiJ63239e725YuQj7YHj_zjmf0nlcnIQaoqo8YXWIsxdeMiZSiQYQ3iGEkG_GmOsOsxQ1hmJ-8Op9W5zmvESKIUfmuOmWIUt5xdlaNi5yj9XryMdQGpgeAUI_buPG61sHVCYbydg_1BpLfrCDpocT6pO0-w4farvzgUsl68NOqHmOIdh50qu_8MIGrnc-2ztvgUhzhffW210OGD0_7RfX7x_e7q-vm9tfPm6vFbWM5bqeGgBFcCMqE1C0VthOGcGMI0gBMM-FaYYURjNvWSVkurCeIIyC6zAMxoBfVzUHXRb1Wm-RHnbYqaq_2gZiWSqfJ2wEU1bbrut7o3ljGOJGt6VErwGLdCeJo0fp20NrMZgRnIUxlCEeixy_Br9Qy3itc_iS6ThSFL08KKf6ZIU9qLEOBYdAB4pwVJQgzhDHfFfv8D7qOcwplVnuKU044_kstdenAhz6WwnYnqhaSyg4RiWShLv9DleVg9LZYqfclfpTw6XWnLy0-u6UA5ADYFHMuNnhBMFI7S6qDJVWxpNpbUgn6CFBW0yg
Cites_doi 10.1097/00006324-199909000-00018
10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.134
10.1016/j.ajo.2004.02.026
10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.076
10.1167/iovs.64.13.10
10.4103/0301-4738.62654
10.1167/iovs.61.2.40
10.1111/opo.12354
10.1155/2016/5185207
10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
10.1080/08164622.2021.1878820
10.1167/iovs.13-12987
10.1186/s12886-022-02719-x
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000038
10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820719e1
10.1038/eye.2008.87
10.1038/s41598-023-50256-4
10.1038/s41433-024-02985-7
10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00497-8
10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01139.x
10.1097/OPX.0000000000001200
10.1080/08164622.2022.2113330
10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101020
10.1371/journal.pone.0122191
10.18240/ijo.2022.07.10
10.1007/BF00150971
10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34116-1
10.3892/mmr.2024.13207
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4
10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.018
10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.01.002
10.1016/j.ajo.2021.06.003
10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01339-9
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2025 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12886-025-04108-6
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database


MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2415
EndPage 9
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_3ac999fbafbc445287bf076ec1a962d3
PMC12056996
A838902808
40335954
10_1186_s12886_025_04108_6
Genre Journal Article
Observational Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Hebei Province Medical Applicable Technology Tracking Project
  grantid: GZ2023088
– fundername: Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University
  grantid: 2HC202113
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7TK
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
M48
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2eb65663468a736c96b25bb20aee4a46d76c6b645c7d8876c4f2050e2a88604e3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1471-2415
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:52 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:27:44 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 18:27:00 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 14:32:00 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:00:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:53:12 EDT 2025
Fri May 16 02:47:14 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 06 05:09:37 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Visual acuity
Optic disc
Pediatric patients
Myopia
Refractive error
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c517t-2eb65663468a736c96b25bb20aee4a46d76c6b645c7d8876c4f2050e2a88604e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201535251?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 40335954
PQID 3201535251
PQPubID 44797
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3ac999fbafbc445287bf076ec1a962d3
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12056996
proquest_miscellaneous_3201401153
proquest_journals_3201535251
gale_infotracmisc_A838902808
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A838902808
pubmed_primary_40335954
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_025_04108_6
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-05-07
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-05-07
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-05-07
  day: 07
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC ophthalmology
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Ophthalmol
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References Y Nam (4108_CR9) 2024; 14
T Yamashita (4108_CR31) 2015; 10
Z Li (4108_CR20) 2018; 95
MT Witmer (4108_CR33) 2010; 55
AC How (4108_CR12) 2009; 127
YH Hwang (4108_CR16) 2012; 21
T Li (4108_CR19) 2023; 106
SY Cohen (4108_CR11) 2022; 88
KA Park (4108_CR13) 2013; 54
4108_CR5
M Kothari (4108_CR7) 2010; 58
QS You (4108_CR28) 2008; 22
4108_CR6
A Ha (4108_CR22) 2021; 232
MP Avila (4108_CR3) 1984; 91
H Terasaki (4108_CR21) 2020; 61
T Aung (4108_CR29) 2001; 108
G Bontzos (4108_CR4) 2022; 105
E Tay (4108_CR15) 2005; 139
EJ Lee (4108_CR8) 2023; 64
J Sowka (4108_CR10) 1999; 76
J Vongphanit (4108_CR14) 2002; 133
M Nakazawa (4108_CR27) 2008; 86
EL Smith (4108_CR18) 2013; 90
L Tong (4108_CR26) 2004; 138
MS Sung (4108_CR30) 2016; 123
LS Qi (4108_CR25) 2022; 15
IG Morgan (4108_CR2) 2012; 379
G Giuffre (4108_CR23) 1991; 15
F Zhang (4108_CR32) 2022; 22
MX Liu (4108_CR17) 2024; 38
UL Osuagwu (4108_CR24) 2017; 37
BA Holden (4108_CR1) 2016; 123
References_xml – volume: 76
  start-page: 618
  issue: 9
  year: 1999
  ident: 4108_CR10
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/00006324-199909000-00018
– volume: 127
  start-page: 894
  issue: 7
  year: 2009
  ident: 4108_CR12
  publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.134
– volume: 138
  start-page: 160
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: 4108_CR26
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.02.026
– volume: 139
  start-page: 247
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  ident: 4108_CR15
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.076
– volume: 64
  start-page: 10
  issue: 13
  year: 2023
  ident: 4108_CR8
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.13.10
– volume: 58
  start-page: 241
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 4108_CR7
  publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.62654
– volume: 61
  start-page: 40
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 4108_CR21
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.2.40
– volume: 37
  start-page: 151
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 4108_CR24
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
  doi: 10.1111/opo.12354
– ident: 4108_CR6
  doi: 10.1155/2016/5185207
– volume: 123
  start-page: 1036
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  ident: 4108_CR1
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
– volume: 105
  start-page: 26
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 4108_CR4
  publication-title: Clin Exp Optom
  doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878820
– volume: 54
  start-page: 7865
  issue: 13
  year: 2013
  ident: 4108_CR13
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12987
– volume: 22
  start-page: 477
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 4108_CR32
  publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02719-x
– volume: 90
  start-page: 1176
  issue: 11
  year: 2013
  ident: 4108_CR18
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000038
– volume: 21
  start-page: 260
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 4108_CR16
  publication-title: J Glaucoma
  doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820719e1
– volume: 22
  start-page: 728
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  ident: 4108_CR28
  publication-title: Eye (Lond)
  doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.87
– volume: 14
  start-page: 498
  issue: 1
  year: 2024
  ident: 4108_CR9
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50256-4
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1654
  issue: 9
  year: 2024
  ident: 4108_CR17
  publication-title: Eye (Lond)
  doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-02985-7
– volume: 108
  start-page: 290
  issue: 2
  year: 2001
  ident: 4108_CR29
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00497-8
– volume: 86
  start-page: 626
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  ident: 4108_CR27
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01139.x
– volume: 95
  start-page: 318
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 4108_CR20
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001200
– volume: 106
  start-page: 746
  issue: 7
  year: 2023
  ident: 4108_CR19
  publication-title: Clin Exp Optom
  doi: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2113330
– volume: 88
  start-page: 101020
  year: 2022
  ident: 4108_CR11
  publication-title: Prog Retin Eye Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101020
– volume: 10
  start-page: e0122191
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 4108_CR31
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122191
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1108
  issue: 7
  year: 2022
  ident: 4108_CR25
  publication-title: Int J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.07.10
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  ident: 4108_CR23
  publication-title: Int Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/BF00150971
– volume: 91
  start-page: 1573
  issue: 12
  year: 1984
  ident: 4108_CR3
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34116-1
– ident: 4108_CR5
  doi: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13207
– volume: 379
  start-page: 1739
  issue: 9827
  year: 2012
  ident: 4108_CR2
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4
– volume: 123
  start-page: 400
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 4108_CR30
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.018
– volume: 55
  start-page: 403
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 4108_CR33
  publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.01.002
– volume: 232
  start-page: 30
  year: 2021
  ident: 4108_CR22
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.06.003
– volume: 133
  start-page: 679
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: 4108_CR14
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01339-9
SSID ssj0020438
Score 2.3593032
Snippet This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This...
Background This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome....
This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This...
BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc...
This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc...
Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 275
SubjectTerms Acuity
Adolescent
Astigmatism
Axial Length, Eye - pathology
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Control algorithms
Correlation analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Eye
Eye Abnormalities - complications
Eye Abnormalities - physiopathology
Female
Health aspects
Humans
Male
Medical colleges
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Myopia
Myopia - etiology
Myopia - physiopathology
Normal distribution
Ophthalmology
Optic disc
Optic Disk - abnormalities
Optic nerve
Optic Nerve Diseases - complications
Optic Nerve Diseases - physiopathology
Patients
Pediatric ophthalmology
Pediatric patients
Pediatrics
Prospective Studies
Refraction
Refraction, Ocular - physiology
Refractive error
Software
Vision disorders in children
Visual acuity
Visual Acuity - physiology
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NSx0xEA_iofQibW3ttlZSEDyUYHY3yWaPVhQp6EnBW8gnPtB9os9C__vOJLuPt3jopbCnJAvZ-Z7NzC-EHPaxrlOwliUZeiakk6y3TjOtAxcOzCGvsRv58kpd3Ihft_J246ovrAkr8MCFcMet9RDDJGeT80JICPBdgtw7-tr2qgkZ5xN83pRMjakWnm9NLTJaHT-DFdZYbCsZFzXXTM3cUEbrf22TN5zSvGBywwOdvyM7Y-hIT8qW35OtOHwgby7Hw_Fd8rBBajrWX9GHP8vHhaV2CLS0rfyOFMGNM5rAPYylp9LaQBcDnTq7Kf6dpSCgy1ylSq8X9xCYUuzgpRPEwUdyc352fXrBxtsUmJd1t2JNdBi7tUJp27XK98o10rmG2xiFFSp0yiunhPRdAMujvEgNlzw2FkjHRWw_ke1hOcTPhMqopEhADttpkRAy3_soXehCZxsvU0V-TMQ1jwU0w-RkQytTWGGAFSazwqiK_ET6r1ci4HUeADEwoxiYf4lBRY6QewbVEljk7dhdABtGgCtzoludgWp0RfZnK0Gd_Hx64r8Z1fnZtBAmIQ6OrCvyfT2Nb2KJ2hCXL2WNwAAb9rJXxGX9SYK32AAtKqJngjT75vnMsLjLYN81MEFBUvrlf1DpK3nbZCWAp9sn26unl_gNgqqVO8j68xfOaiFl
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Association between myopia and relative peripheral refraction in children with monocular Tilted disc syndrome
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40335954
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201535251
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201401153
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12056996
https://doaj.org/article/3ac999fbafbc445287bf076ec1a962d3
Volume 25
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9wwEBZtAqWX0nfdposKhR6KiWzrtaeSLQmhkFBCAksvQi83C4m93d0U-u87I9ubNYWC8UGSsTQvjaSZT4R8nMaiqIO1eS3CNOfCiXxqnc61Dow7MIeswGzks3N5esW_zcW833Bb92GVg01Mhjq0HvfIDyuYqRCKRBRflr9yvDUKT1f7KzQekn2ELkOpVvP7BReecg2JMloersEWawy5FTnjBdO5HE1GCbP_X8u8MzWNwyZ35qGTp-RJ70DSo47jz8iD2Dwnj876I_IX5HaH4LSPwqK3f9rlwlLbBNolr_yOFCGOE6bADZTVqy7BgS4aOuR3U9yjpTDuNsWq0svFDbinFPN46QB08JJcnRxffj3N-zsVci8KtcnL6NCDq7jUVlXST6UrhXMlszFyy2VQ0ksnufAqgP2RntclEyyWFkjHeKxekb2mbeIbQkWUgtdADqs0rxE43_soXFBB2dKLOiOfB-KaZQedYdKSQ0vTscIAK0xihZEZmSH9ty0R9joVtKufptciU1kPDm3tbO085wJ-6WqmZPSFncoyVBn5hNwzqJzAIm_7HAPoMMJcmSNd6QRXozNyMGoJSuXH1QP_Ta_Ua3Mvghn5sK3GLzFQrYntXdeGo5sNfXndict2SJxVmAbNM6JHgjQa87imWVwnyO8CmCBhafr2__16Rx6XSbzhUQdkb7O6i-_Badq4SdKMCdmfHZ9_v5ikrQd4X8x-_AWSFRt_
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Nb9MwFLfGkIAL4nMEBhgJxAFFcxLbcQ4IjY-pY-tOndSbsR0HKm1JaTvQ_in-Rt5zkq4RErdJPcVO6rzvF7_3MyGvC58kVWlMXImyiLmwIi6MVbFSJeMWzCFLsBt5fCJHp_zrVEy3yJ--FwbLKnubGAx12Tj8Rr6XgadCKBKRfJj_jPHUKNxd7Y_QaMXiyF_-hpRt-f7wM_D3TZoefJl8GsXdqQKxE0m-ilNvMYbJuFQmz6QrpE2FtSkz3nPDZZlLJ63kwuUlaKB0vEqZYD41SknGfQbPvUFuguNlmOzl06sED3fV-sYcJfeWYPsVlviKmPGEqVgOnF84I-BfT7DhCodlmht-7-AeudsFrHS_lbD7ZMvXD8itcbcl_5CcbzCYdlVf9Pyymc8MNXVJ22aZX54ipHLAMDiDa9Wibaigs5r2_eQUvwlToHMTamPpZHYG4TDFvmHaAys8IqfXQu3HZLtuav-EUOGl4BWQw-SKVwjU75wXtszL3KROVBF51xNXz1uoDh1SHCV1ywoNrNCBFVpG5CPSfz0TYbbDhWbxXXdaqzPjIICurKms41zAX9qK5dK7xBQyLbOIvEXuaTQGwCJnup4GWDDCaul9lakAj6MisjuYCUrshsM9_3VnRJb6SuQj8mo9jHdiYVztm4t2DsewHtay04rL-pU4y7DtmkdEDQRp8M7DkXr2I0CMJ8AECanw0_-v6yW5PZqMj_Xx4cnRM3InDaIOv3yXbK8WF_45BGwr-yJoCSXfrlst_wKm_1N8
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association+between+myopia+and+relative+peripheral+refraction+in+children+with+monocular+Tilted+disc+syndrome&rft.jtitle=BMC+ophthalmology&rft.au=Wang%2C+Jiawei&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Shangzhu&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Huijun&rft.au=Duan%2C+Jialiang&rft.date=2025-05-07&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2415&rft.volume=25&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12886-025-04108-6&rft.externalDocID=PMC12056996
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon