Association between myopia and relative peripheral refraction in children with monocular Tilted disc syndrome
This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hosp...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC ophthalmology Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 275 - 9 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
07.05.2025
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.
This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.
Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).
Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.MethodsThis single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5–17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of − 3.24 D and − 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson’s correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.ResultsTilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (− 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and − 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).ConclusionsPediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia. Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Methods This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5–17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of − 3.24 D and − 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson’s correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Results Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (− 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and − 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Conclusions Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia. This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia. This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia. This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.BACKGROUNDThis study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.METHODSThis single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).RESULTSTilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.CONCLUSIONSPediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia. Background This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Methods This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value. Results Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001). Conclusions Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia. Keywords: Myopia, Optic disc, Pediatric patients, Refractive error, Visual acuity |
ArticleNumber | 275 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Wang, Jiangnan Jiang, Huijun Chai, Song Wang, Jiawei Zhang, Shangzhu Duan, Jialiang Wang, Shaoyi Xi, Ruijie |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jiawei surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Jiawei – sequence: 2 givenname: Shangzhu surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Shangzhu – sequence: 3 givenname: Huijun surname: Jiang fullname: Jiang, Huijun – sequence: 4 givenname: Jialiang surname: Duan fullname: Duan, Jialiang – sequence: 5 givenname: Ruijie surname: Xi fullname: Xi, Ruijie – sequence: 6 givenname: Shaoyi surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Shaoyi – sequence: 7 givenname: Jiangnan surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Jiangnan – sequence: 8 givenname: Song surname: Chai fullname: Chai, Song |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40335954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkk1v1DAQhiNURD_gD3BAkbhwSfF3nBNaVUArVeJSzpY_JrteJfZiJ63239e725YuQj7YHj_zjmf0nlcnIQaoqo8YXWIsxdeMiZSiQYQ3iGEkG_GmOsOsxQ1hmJ-8Op9W5zmvESKIUfmuOmWIUt5xdlaNi5yj9XryMdQGpgeAUI_buPG61sHVCYbydg_1BpLfrCDpocT6pO0-w4farvzgUsl68NOqHmOIdh50qu_8MIGrnc-2ztvgUhzhffW210OGD0_7RfX7x_e7q-vm9tfPm6vFbWM5bqeGgBFcCMqE1C0VthOGcGMI0gBMM-FaYYURjNvWSVkurCeIIyC6zAMxoBfVzUHXRb1Wm-RHnbYqaq_2gZiWSqfJ2wEU1bbrut7o3ljGOJGt6VErwGLdCeJo0fp20NrMZgRnIUxlCEeixy_Br9Qy3itc_iS6ThSFL08KKf6ZIU9qLEOBYdAB4pwVJQgzhDHfFfv8D7qOcwplVnuKU044_kstdenAhz6WwnYnqhaSyg4RiWShLv9DleVg9LZYqfclfpTw6XWnLy0-u6UA5ADYFHMuNnhBMFI7S6qDJVWxpNpbUgn6CFBW0yg |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/00006324-199909000-00018 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.134 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.02.026 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.076 10.1167/iovs.64.13.10 10.4103/0301-4738.62654 10.1167/iovs.61.2.40 10.1111/opo.12354 10.1155/2016/5185207 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878820 10.1167/iovs.13-12987 10.1186/s12886-022-02719-x 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000038 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820719e1 10.1038/eye.2008.87 10.1038/s41598-023-50256-4 10.1038/s41433-024-02985-7 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00497-8 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01139.x 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001200 10.1080/08164622.2022.2113330 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101020 10.1371/journal.pone.0122191 10.18240/ijo.2022.07.10 10.1007/BF00150971 10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34116-1 10.3892/mmr.2024.13207 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.018 10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.01.002 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.06.003 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01339-9 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12886-025-04108-6 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Open Access Journals (DOAJ) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1471-2415 |
EndPage | 9 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_3ac999fbafbc445287bf076ec1a962d3 PMC12056996 A838902808 40335954 10_1186_s12886_025_04108_6 |
Genre | Journal Article Observational Study |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Hebei Province Medical Applicable Technology Tracking Project grantid: GZ2023088 – fundername: Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University grantid: 2HC202113 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMOBN F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7TK 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. M48 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-2eb65663468a736c96b25bb20aee4a46d76c6b645c7d8876c4f2050e2a88604e3 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1471-2415 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:52 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:27:44 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 18:27:00 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 14:32:00 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:00:20 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:53:12 EDT 2025 Fri May 16 02:47:14 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 06 05:09:37 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Visual acuity Optic disc Pediatric patients Myopia Refractive error |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c517t-2eb65663468a736c96b25bb20aee4a46d76c6b645c7d8876c4f2050e2a88604e3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201535251?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 40335954 |
PQID | 3201535251 |
PQPubID | 44797 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3ac999fbafbc445287bf076ec1a962d3 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12056996 proquest_miscellaneous_3201401153 proquest_journals_3201535251 gale_infotracmisc_A838902808 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A838902808 pubmed_primary_40335954 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_025_04108_6 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-05-07 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-05-07 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2025 text: 2025-05-07 day: 07 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC ophthalmology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Ophthalmol |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | Y Nam (4108_CR9) 2024; 14 T Yamashita (4108_CR31) 2015; 10 Z Li (4108_CR20) 2018; 95 MT Witmer (4108_CR33) 2010; 55 AC How (4108_CR12) 2009; 127 YH Hwang (4108_CR16) 2012; 21 T Li (4108_CR19) 2023; 106 SY Cohen (4108_CR11) 2022; 88 KA Park (4108_CR13) 2013; 54 4108_CR5 M Kothari (4108_CR7) 2010; 58 QS You (4108_CR28) 2008; 22 4108_CR6 A Ha (4108_CR22) 2021; 232 MP Avila (4108_CR3) 1984; 91 H Terasaki (4108_CR21) 2020; 61 T Aung (4108_CR29) 2001; 108 G Bontzos (4108_CR4) 2022; 105 E Tay (4108_CR15) 2005; 139 EJ Lee (4108_CR8) 2023; 64 J Sowka (4108_CR10) 1999; 76 J Vongphanit (4108_CR14) 2002; 133 M Nakazawa (4108_CR27) 2008; 86 EL Smith (4108_CR18) 2013; 90 L Tong (4108_CR26) 2004; 138 MS Sung (4108_CR30) 2016; 123 LS Qi (4108_CR25) 2022; 15 IG Morgan (4108_CR2) 2012; 379 G Giuffre (4108_CR23) 1991; 15 F Zhang (4108_CR32) 2022; 22 MX Liu (4108_CR17) 2024; 38 UL Osuagwu (4108_CR24) 2017; 37 BA Holden (4108_CR1) 2016; 123 |
References_xml | – volume: 76 start-page: 618 issue: 9 year: 1999 ident: 4108_CR10 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/00006324-199909000-00018 – volume: 127 start-page: 894 issue: 7 year: 2009 ident: 4108_CR12 publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.134 – volume: 138 start-page: 160 issue: 1 year: 2004 ident: 4108_CR26 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.02.026 – volume: 139 start-page: 247 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 4108_CR15 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.076 – volume: 64 start-page: 10 issue: 13 year: 2023 ident: 4108_CR8 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.13.10 – volume: 58 start-page: 241 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 4108_CR7 publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.62654 – volume: 61 start-page: 40 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 4108_CR21 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.2.40 – volume: 37 start-page: 151 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 4108_CR24 publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt doi: 10.1111/opo.12354 – ident: 4108_CR6 doi: 10.1155/2016/5185207 – volume: 123 start-page: 1036 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 4108_CR1 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006 – volume: 105 start-page: 26 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 4108_CR4 publication-title: Clin Exp Optom doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878820 – volume: 54 start-page: 7865 issue: 13 year: 2013 ident: 4108_CR13 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12987 – volume: 22 start-page: 477 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 4108_CR32 publication-title: BMC Ophthalmol doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02719-x – volume: 90 start-page: 1176 issue: 11 year: 2013 ident: 4108_CR18 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000038 – volume: 21 start-page: 260 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 4108_CR16 publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820719e1 – volume: 22 start-page: 728 issue: 5 year: 2008 ident: 4108_CR28 publication-title: Eye (Lond) doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.87 – volume: 14 start-page: 498 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 4108_CR9 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50256-4 – volume: 38 start-page: 1654 issue: 9 year: 2024 ident: 4108_CR17 publication-title: Eye (Lond) doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-02985-7 – volume: 108 start-page: 290 issue: 2 year: 2001 ident: 4108_CR29 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00497-8 – volume: 86 start-page: 626 issue: 6 year: 2008 ident: 4108_CR27 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01139.x – volume: 95 start-page: 318 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 4108_CR20 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001200 – volume: 106 start-page: 746 issue: 7 year: 2023 ident: 4108_CR19 publication-title: Clin Exp Optom doi: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2113330 – volume: 88 start-page: 101020 year: 2022 ident: 4108_CR11 publication-title: Prog Retin Eye Res doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101020 – volume: 10 start-page: e0122191 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 4108_CR31 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122191 – volume: 15 start-page: 1108 issue: 7 year: 2022 ident: 4108_CR25 publication-title: Int J Ophthalmol doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.07.10 – volume: 15 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 1991 ident: 4108_CR23 publication-title: Int Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/BF00150971 – volume: 91 start-page: 1573 issue: 12 year: 1984 ident: 4108_CR3 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34116-1 – ident: 4108_CR5 doi: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13207 – volume: 379 start-page: 1739 issue: 9827 year: 2012 ident: 4108_CR2 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4 – volume: 123 start-page: 400 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 4108_CR30 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.018 – volume: 55 start-page: 403 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 4108_CR33 publication-title: Surv Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.01.002 – volume: 232 start-page: 30 year: 2021 ident: 4108_CR22 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.06.003 – volume: 133 start-page: 679 issue: 5 year: 2002 ident: 4108_CR14 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01339-9 |
SSID | ssj0020438 |
Score | 2.3593032 |
Snippet | This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.
This... Background This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.... This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome. This... BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc... This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc... Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 275 |
SubjectTerms | Acuity Adolescent Astigmatism Axial Length, Eye - pathology Child Child, Preschool Children Children & youth Control algorithms Correlation analysis Cross-Sectional Studies Eye Eye Abnormalities - complications Eye Abnormalities - physiopathology Female Health aspects Humans Male Medical colleges Medical research Medicine, Experimental Myopia Myopia - etiology Myopia - physiopathology Normal distribution Ophthalmology Optic disc Optic Disk - abnormalities Optic nerve Optic Nerve Diseases - complications Optic Nerve Diseases - physiopathology Patients Pediatric ophthalmology Pediatric patients Pediatrics Prospective Studies Refraction Refraction, Ocular - physiology Refractive error Software Vision disorders in children Visual acuity Visual Acuity - physiology |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Open Access Journals (DOAJ) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NSx0xEA_iofQibW3ttlZSEDyUYHY3yWaPVhQp6EnBW8gnPtB9os9C__vOJLuPt3jopbCnJAvZ-Z7NzC-EHPaxrlOwliUZeiakk6y3TjOtAxcOzCGvsRv58kpd3Ihft_J246ovrAkr8MCFcMet9RDDJGeT80JICPBdgtw7-tr2qgkZ5xN83pRMjakWnm9NLTJaHT-DFdZYbCsZFzXXTM3cUEbrf22TN5zSvGBywwOdvyM7Y-hIT8qW35OtOHwgby7Hw_Fd8rBBajrWX9GHP8vHhaV2CLS0rfyOFMGNM5rAPYylp9LaQBcDnTq7Kf6dpSCgy1ylSq8X9xCYUuzgpRPEwUdyc352fXrBxtsUmJd1t2JNdBi7tUJp27XK98o10rmG2xiFFSp0yiunhPRdAMujvEgNlzw2FkjHRWw_ke1hOcTPhMqopEhADttpkRAy3_soXehCZxsvU0V-TMQ1jwU0w-RkQytTWGGAFSazwqiK_ET6r1ci4HUeADEwoxiYf4lBRY6QewbVEljk7dhdABtGgCtzoludgWp0RfZnK0Gd_Hx64r8Z1fnZtBAmIQ6OrCvyfT2Nb2KJ2hCXL2WNwAAb9rJXxGX9SYK32AAtKqJngjT75vnMsLjLYN81MEFBUvrlf1DpK3nbZCWAp9sn26unl_gNgqqVO8j68xfOaiFl priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Association between myopia and relative peripheral refraction in children with monocular Tilted disc syndrome |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40335954 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201535251 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201401153 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12056996 https://doaj.org/article/3ac999fbafbc445287bf076ec1a962d3 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9wwEBZtAqWX0nfdposKhR6KiWzrtaeSLQmhkFBCAksvQi83C4m93d0U-u87I9ubNYWC8UGSsTQvjaSZT4R8nMaiqIO1eS3CNOfCiXxqnc61Dow7MIeswGzks3N5esW_zcW833Bb92GVg01Mhjq0HvfIDyuYqRCKRBRflr9yvDUKT1f7KzQekn2ELkOpVvP7BReecg2JMloersEWawy5FTnjBdO5HE1GCbP_X8u8MzWNwyZ35qGTp-RJ70DSo47jz8iD2Dwnj876I_IX5HaH4LSPwqK3f9rlwlLbBNolr_yOFCGOE6bADZTVqy7BgS4aOuR3U9yjpTDuNsWq0svFDbinFPN46QB08JJcnRxffj3N-zsVci8KtcnL6NCDq7jUVlXST6UrhXMlszFyy2VQ0ksnufAqgP2RntclEyyWFkjHeKxekb2mbeIbQkWUgtdADqs0rxE43_soXFBB2dKLOiOfB-KaZQedYdKSQ0vTscIAK0xihZEZmSH9ty0R9joVtKufptciU1kPDm3tbO085wJ-6WqmZPSFncoyVBn5hNwzqJzAIm_7HAPoMMJcmSNd6QRXozNyMGoJSuXH1QP_Ta_Ua3Mvghn5sK3GLzFQrYntXdeGo5sNfXndict2SJxVmAbNM6JHgjQa87imWVwnyO8CmCBhafr2__16Rx6XSbzhUQdkb7O6i-_Badq4SdKMCdmfHZ9_v5ikrQd4X8x-_AWSFRt_ |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Nb9MwFLfGkIAL4nMEBhgJxAFFcxLbcQ4IjY-pY-tOndSbsR0HKm1JaTvQ_in-Rt5zkq4RErdJPcVO6rzvF7_3MyGvC58kVWlMXImyiLmwIi6MVbFSJeMWzCFLsBt5fCJHp_zrVEy3yJ--FwbLKnubGAx12Tj8Rr6XgadCKBKRfJj_jPHUKNxd7Y_QaMXiyF_-hpRt-f7wM_D3TZoefJl8GsXdqQKxE0m-ilNvMYbJuFQmz6QrpE2FtSkz3nPDZZlLJ63kwuUlaKB0vEqZYD41SknGfQbPvUFuguNlmOzl06sED3fV-sYcJfeWYPsVlviKmPGEqVgOnF84I-BfT7DhCodlmht-7-AeudsFrHS_lbD7ZMvXD8itcbcl_5CcbzCYdlVf9Pyymc8MNXVJ22aZX54ipHLAMDiDa9Wibaigs5r2_eQUvwlToHMTamPpZHYG4TDFvmHaAys8IqfXQu3HZLtuav-EUOGl4BWQw-SKVwjU75wXtszL3KROVBF51xNXz1uoDh1SHCV1ywoNrNCBFVpG5CPSfz0TYbbDhWbxXXdaqzPjIICurKms41zAX9qK5dK7xBQyLbOIvEXuaTQGwCJnup4GWDDCaul9lakAj6MisjuYCUrshsM9_3VnRJb6SuQj8mo9jHdiYVztm4t2DsewHtay04rL-pU4y7DtmkdEDQRp8M7DkXr2I0CMJ8AECanw0_-v6yW5PZqMj_Xx4cnRM3InDaIOv3yXbK8WF_45BGwr-yJoCSXfrlst_wKm_1N8 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association+between+myopia+and+relative+peripheral+refraction+in+children+with+monocular+Tilted+disc+syndrome&rft.jtitle=BMC+ophthalmology&rft.au=Wang%2C+Jiawei&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Shangzhu&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Huijun&rft.au=Duan%2C+Jialiang&rft.date=2025-05-07&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2415&rft.volume=25&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12886-025-04108-6&rft.externalDocID=PMC12056996 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2415&client=summon |