Comparison of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to either analgesic alone for suspected renal colic pain in the ED
To compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy of a combination of intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and ketorol...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 165 - 172 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.02.2020
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy of a combination of intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and ketorolac (30 mg), to ketorolac (30 mg), and to lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) in patients aged 18–64 presenting to the ED with suspected renal colic. Primary outcome included difference in pain scores between the groups at 30 min. Secondary outcomes included a comparative reduction in pain scores in each group from baseline to 30 and 60 min as well as rates of adverse events and need for rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min.
We enrolled 150 subjects (50 per group). The difference in mean pain scores at 30 min between Lidocaine and Lidocaine/Ketorolac groups was −2.89 (95% CI: −4.39 to −1.39); between Ketorolac and Lidocaine/Ketorolac group was −0.92 (95% CI: −2.44 to 0.61); and between Ketorolac and Lidocaine was −1.98 (95% CI: −3.69 to −0.27). A comparative percentage of subjects in each group required rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. No clinically concerning changes in vital signs were observed. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, nausea, and headache.
The administration of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to ED patients with suspected renal colic results in better analgesia in comparison to lidocaine alone but provides no analgesic advantages over ketorolac alone.
Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: NCT02902770. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy of a combination of intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and ketorolac (30 mg), to ketorolac (30 mg), and to lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) in patients aged 18-64 presenting to the ED with suspected renal colic. Primary outcome included difference in pain scores between the groups at 30 min. Secondary outcomes included a comparative reduction in pain scores in each group from baseline to 30 and 60 min as well as rates of adverse events and need for rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min.
We enrolled 150 subjects (50 per group). The difference in mean pain scores at 30 min between Lidocaine and Lidocaine/Ketorolac groups was -2.89 (95% CI: -4.39 to -1.39); between Ketorolac and Lidocaine/Ketorolac group was -0.92 (95% CI: -2.44 to 0.61); and between Ketorolac and Lidocaine was -1.98 (95% CI: -3.69 to -0.27). A comparative percentage of subjects in each group required rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. No clinically concerning changes in vital signs were observed. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, nausea, and headache.
The administration of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to ED patients with suspected renal colic results in better analgesia in comparison to lidocaine alone but provides no analgesic advantages over ketorolac alone. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: NCT02902770. To compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy of a combination of intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and ketorolac (30 mg), to ketorolac (30 mg), and to lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) in patients aged 18–64 presenting to the ED with suspected renal colic. Primary outcome included difference in pain scores between the groups at 30 min. Secondary outcomes included a comparative reduction in pain scores in each group from baseline to 30 and 60 min as well as rates of adverse events and need for rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. We enrolled 150 subjects (50 per group). The difference in mean pain scores at 30 min between Lidocaine and Lidocaine/Ketorolac groups was −2.89 (95% CI: −4.39 to −1.39); between Ketorolac and Lidocaine/Ketorolac group was −0.92 (95% CI: −2.44 to 0.61); and between Ketorolac and Lidocaine was −1.98 (95% CI: −3.69 to −0.27). A comparative percentage of subjects in each group required rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. No clinically concerning changes in vital signs were observed. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, nausea, and headache. The administration of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to ED patients with suspected renal colic results in better analgesia in comparison to lidocaine alone but provides no analgesic advantages over ketorolac alone. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: NCT02902770. AbstractStudy objectiveTo compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic. MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy of a combination of intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and ketorolac (30 mg), to ketorolac (30 mg), and to lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) in patients aged 18–64 presenting to the ED with suspected renal colic. Primary outcome included difference in pain scores between the groups at 30 min. Secondary outcomes included a comparative reduction in pain scores in each group from baseline to 30 and 60 min as well as rates of adverse events and need for rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. ResultsWe enrolled 150 subjects (50 per group). The difference in mean pain scores at 30 min between Lidocaine and Lidocaine/Ketorolac groups was −2.89 (95% CI: −4.39 to −1.39); between Ketorolac and Lidocaine/Ketorolac group was −0.92 (95% CI: −2.44 to 0.61); and between Ketorolac and Lidocaine was −1.98 (95% CI: −3.69 to −0.27). A comparative percentage of subjects in each group required rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. No clinically concerning changes in vital signs were observed. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, nausea, and headache. ConclusionThe administration of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to ED patients with suspected renal colic results in better analgesia in comparison to lidocaine alone but provides no analgesic advantages over ketorolac alone. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: NCT02902770. Study objectiveTo compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy of a combination of intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and ketorolac (30 mg), to ketorolac (30 mg), and to lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) in patients aged 18–64 presenting to the ED with suspected renal colic. Primary outcome included difference in pain scores between the groups at 30 min. Secondary outcomes included a comparative reduction in pain scores in each group from baseline to 30 and 60 min as well as rates of adverse events and need for rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min.ResultsWe enrolled 150 subjects (50 per group). The difference in mean pain scores at 30 min between Lidocaine and Lidocaine/Ketorolac groups was −2.89 (95% CI: −4.39 to −1.39); between Ketorolac and Lidocaine/Ketorolac group was −0.92 (95% CI: −2.44 to 0.61); and between Ketorolac and Lidocaine was −1.98 (95% CI: −3.69 to −0.27). A comparative percentage of subjects in each group required rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. No clinically concerning changes in vital signs were observed. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, nausea, and headache.ConclusionThe administration of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to ED patients with suspected renal colic results in better analgesia in comparison to lidocaine alone but provides no analgesic advantages over ketorolac alone.Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: NCT02902770. To compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic.STUDY OBJECTIVETo compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic.We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy of a combination of intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and ketorolac (30 mg), to ketorolac (30 mg), and to lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) in patients aged 18-64 presenting to the ED with suspected renal colic. Primary outcome included difference in pain scores between the groups at 30 min. Secondary outcomes included a comparative reduction in pain scores in each group from baseline to 30 and 60 min as well as rates of adverse events and need for rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min.METHODSWe conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy of a combination of intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) and ketorolac (30 mg), to ketorolac (30 mg), and to lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) in patients aged 18-64 presenting to the ED with suspected renal colic. Primary outcome included difference in pain scores between the groups at 30 min. Secondary outcomes included a comparative reduction in pain scores in each group from baseline to 30 and 60 min as well as rates of adverse events and need for rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min.We enrolled 150 subjects (50 per group). The difference in mean pain scores at 30 min between Lidocaine and Lidocaine/Ketorolac groups was -2.89 (95% CI: -4.39 to -1.39); between Ketorolac and Lidocaine/Ketorolac group was -0.92 (95% CI: -2.44 to 0.61); and between Ketorolac and Lidocaine was -1.98 (95% CI: -3.69 to -0.27). A comparative percentage of subjects in each group required rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. No clinically concerning changes in vital signs were observed. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, nausea, and headache.RESULTSWe enrolled 150 subjects (50 per group). The difference in mean pain scores at 30 min between Lidocaine and Lidocaine/Ketorolac groups was -2.89 (95% CI: -4.39 to -1.39); between Ketorolac and Lidocaine/Ketorolac group was -0.92 (95% CI: -2.44 to 0.61); and between Ketorolac and Lidocaine was -1.98 (95% CI: -3.69 to -0.27). A comparative percentage of subjects in each group required rescue analgesia at 30 and 60 min. No clinically concerning changes in vital signs were observed. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Commonly reported adverse effects were dizziness, nausea, and headache.The administration of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to ED patients with suspected renal colic results in better analgesia in comparison to lidocaine alone but provides no analgesic advantages over ketorolac alone. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: NCT02902770.CONCLUSIONThe administration of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to ED patients with suspected renal colic results in better analgesia in comparison to lidocaine alone but provides no analgesic advantages over ketorolac alone. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: NCT02902770. |
Author | Flom, Peter Fassassi, Catsim Mann, Stefan S. Butt, Mahlaqa Brady, Jason Gulati, Vishal Rothberger, Nechama Monfort, Ralph Likourezos, Antonios Drapkin, Jefferson Motov, Sergey Hossain, Rukhsana Marshall, John |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sergey surname: Motov fullname: Motov, Sergey organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Catsim surname: Fassassi fullname: Fassassi, Catsim organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Jefferson surname: Drapkin fullname: Drapkin, Jefferson email: jdrapkin@maimonidesmed.org organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Mahlaqa surname: Butt fullname: Butt, Mahlaqa organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Rukhsana surname: Hossain fullname: Hossain, Rukhsana organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 6 givenname: Antonios surname: Likourezos fullname: Likourezos, Antonios organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 7 givenname: Ralph surname: Monfort fullname: Monfort, Ralph organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 8 givenname: Jason surname: Brady fullname: Brady, Jason organization: Department of Pharmacy, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 9 givenname: Nechama surname: Rothberger fullname: Rothberger, Nechama organization: Department of Pharmacy, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 10 givenname: Stefan S. surname: Mann fullname: Mann, Stefan S. organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 11 givenname: Peter surname: Flom fullname: Flom, Peter organization: Peter Flom Consulting, New York, USA – sequence: 12 givenname: Vishal surname: Gulati fullname: Gulati, Vishal organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA – sequence: 13 givenname: John surname: Marshall fullname: Marshall, John organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30770244$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFks1u1DAUhS1URKeFF2CBLLFhM9NrJ54kCFVC0_IjVWIBrC3HuQGnjj3YSaVKPDx3Oi2LkSgLywuf79j3HJ-woxADMvZSwEqAWJ8NKzPguJIgmhWIFZT1E7YQqpDLWlTiiC2gKtRyXanqmJ3kPAAIUaryGTsuoKpAluWC_d7EcWuSyzHw2HMXpmRuMMQ5c--6aI0LeHaNU0zRG8ttHFsXzORIPkWObvqJiZtg_A_MznLj6Ym8j4nnOW_RTtjxhHRMpKfzLfnRJZwwfnnxnD3tjc_44n4_Zd8_XH7bfFpeffn4efP-ammVWE_LToJselS0oOulaW1fq7bswRgA7Bq7LrtWKSlrWzStUU0NUpYKLTSdMdYWp-zN3neb4q8Z86RHly16bwLSpFpK2YgCiqoh6esD6RDnRAOQqhQVxS5VQapX96q5HbHT2-RGk271Q64kqPcCm2LOCXtt3XQXG-XrvBagdxXqQe8q1LsKNQhNFRIqD9AH90ehd3sIKcYbh0ln6zBY7FyiFnQX3eP4-QFuvQvOGn-Nt5j_RiB0lhr0193H2v0r0RQAFAoZvP23wf9u_wPffN6t |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_4103_UROS_UROS_32_20 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_024_02640_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00240_023_01496_6 crossref_primary_10_15441_ceem_21_161 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_NURSE_0000823228_89904_b5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jen_2024_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2023_09_134 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jopan_2024_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annemergmed_2024_06_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2020_12_073 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_66687 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_6027093 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000024721 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_021_01329_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2020_03_061 crossref_primary_10_1111_acem_14202 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_706844 crossref_primary_10_1002_aet2_10405 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb07107.x 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00499.x 10.1093/bja/59.1.61 10.1136/bmj.38119.581991.55 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.062 10.1136/emermed-2016-206351.2 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.013 10.1136/emj.17.4.261 10.1186/1752-1947-5-256 10.1186/1471-2490-12-13 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.040 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.12.014 10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90003-7 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.014 10.5812/aapm.43595 10.1197/aemj.10.4.390 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31820429d9 10.3390/ph3051304 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2019. Elsevier Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. – notice: 2019. Elsevier Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7RV 7T5 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH H94 K9. KB0 M0S M1P M2O MBDVC NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Immunology Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Proquest Medical Database Research Library Research Library (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed Research Library Prep MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1532-8171 |
EndPage | 172 |
ExternalDocumentID | 30770244 10_1016_j_ajem_2019_01_048 S0735675719300701 1_s2_0_S0735675719300701 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 23M 354 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 7RV 7X7 88E 8F7 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8P~ 9JM A8Z AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABUWG ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACIWK ACPRK ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADFRT ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEUYN AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFKRA AFPUW AFRAH AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHMBA AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN AZQEC BENPR BKEYQ BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BPHCQ BVXVI C45 CAG CCPQU COF CS3 DWQXO EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EMOBN EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN FYUFA G-2 G-Q GBLVA GNUQQ GUQSH HDV HMCUK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM LX1 M1P M29 M2O M41 MO0 N4W N9A NAPCQ O-L O9- OAUVE OBH OB~ OHH OM0 OVD OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ SV3 T5K TEORI UAP UHS UKHRP UNMZH UV1 WOW WUQ Z5R ZGI ZY1 ~G- 3V. AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV ALIPV AMFUW PKN RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU EFLBG ESTFP LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION NPM 7T5 7XB 8FK H94 K9. MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d2029fe59fe0df2abcf85b4f0aa00ed9c64db55228c39ba59802245ec09daacc3 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 04:38:26 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 00:52:27 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:57:16 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:01:06 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:46:07 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:07 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:33:53 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Analgesia Lidocaine Emergency Department Ketorolac |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c516t-d2029fe59fe0df2abcf85b4f0aa00ed9c64db55228c39ba59802245ec09daacc3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 30770244 |
PQID | 2417016253 |
PQPubID | 1216387 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2229130379 proquest_journals_2417016253 pubmed_primary_30770244 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ajem_2019_01_048 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2019_01_048 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajem_2019_01_048 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0735675719300701 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajem_2019_01_048 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2020 text: 2020-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Philadelphia |
PublicationTitle | The American journal of emergency medicine |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Emerg Med |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier Limited |
References | Firouzian, Alipour, Rashidian Dezfouli (bb0060) Mar 2016; 34 Larkin, Peacock, Pearl, Blair, D'Amico (bb0020) 1999; 17 Keller, Seamon, Jones (bb0065) Nov 2016; 33 Steinberg, Nangia, Curtis (bb0080) Jan–Mar 2011; 20 Hosseininejad, Amini Ahidashti, Bozorgi (bb0110) Jul 2017; 5 Duthie, Nimmo (bb0045) 1987; 59 Schulz, Altman, Moher (bb0075) 2010 Soleimanpour, Hassanzadeh, Mohammadi, Vaezi, Esfanjani (bb0050) Jun 29 2011; 5 Arhami Dolatabadi, Memary, Kariman, Nasiri Gigloo, Baratloo (bb0085) Feb 25 2017; 7 Soleimanpour, Hassanzadeh, Vaezi, Golzari, Esfanjani, Soleimanpour (bb0055) May 4 2012; 12 Bijur (bb0100) 2003; 10 Maleki Verki, Porozan, Motamed, Fahimi, Aryan (bb0090) 2019; 37 Safdar, Degutis, Landry, Vedere, Moscovitz, D'Onofrio (bb0030) Aug 2006; 48 Holdgate, Pollock (bb0035) 2004; 328 O'Connor, Schug, Cardwell (bb0025) 2000; 17 E Silva, Scherber, Cabrera (bb0070) Aug 2018; 72 Talati, Tiselius, Albala, Urolithiasis (bb0010) Dec 22, 2012 Motov, Yasavolian, Likourezos (bb0095) Aug 2017; 70 Holdgate, Asha, Craig, Thompson (bb0105) 2003; 15 Golzari, Soleimanpour, Rahmani (bb0005) Feb 13 2014; 4 Sandhu, Iacovou, Fletcher, Kaisary, Philip, Arkell (bb0015) 1994; 74 Davenport, Waine (bb0040) 2010; 3 O'Connor (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0025) 2000; 17 Arhami Dolatabadi (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0085) 2017; 7 Davenport (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0040) 2010; 3 Golzari (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0005) 2014; 4 Soleimanpour (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0050) 2011; 5 Motov (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0095) 2017; 70 Soleimanpour (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0055) 2012; 12 E Silva (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0070) 2018; 72 Safdar (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0030) 2006; 48 Firouzian (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0060) 2016; 34 Maleki Verki (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0090) 2019; 37 Steinberg (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0080) 2011; 20 Duthie (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0045) 1987; 59 Holdgate (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0035) 2004; 328 Hosseininejad (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0110) 2017; 5 Sandhu (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0015) 1994; 74 Keller (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0065) 2016; 33 Schulz (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0075) Larkin (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0020) 1999; 17 Bijur (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0100) 2003; 10 Talati (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0010) 2012 Holdgate (10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0105) 2003; 15 |
References_xml | – volume: 74 start-page: 690 year: 1994 end-page: 693 ident: bb0015 article-title: A comparison of intramuscular ketorolac and pethidine in the alleviation of renal colic publication-title: Br J Urol – volume: 17 start-page: 261 year: 2000 end-page: 264 ident: bb0025 article-title: A comparison of the efficacy and safety of morphine and pethidine as analgesia for suspected renal colic in the emergency setting publication-title: J Accid Emerg Med – volume: 5 start-page: 165 year: Jul 2017 end-page: 170 ident: bb0110 article-title: Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with ketorolac and morphine in patient with acute renal colic; a triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial publication-title: Bull Emerg Trauma – volume: 70 start-page: 177 year: Aug 2017 end-page: 184 ident: bb0095 article-title: Comparison of intravenous ketorolac at three single-dose regimens for treating acute pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Ann Emerg Med – volume: 48 year: Aug 2006 ident: bb0030 article-title: Intravenous morphine plus ketorolac is superior to either drug alone for treatment of acute renal colic publication-title: Ann Emerg Med – volume: 7 year: Feb 25 2017 ident: bb0085 article-title: Intranasal desmopressin compared with intravenous ketorolac for pain management of patients with renal colic referring to the emergency department: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: Anesth Pain Med – volume: 34 start-page: 443 year: Mar 2016 end-page: 448 ident: bb0060 article-title: Does lidocaine as an adjuvant to morphine improve pain relief in patients presenting to the ED with acute renal colic? A double-blind, randomized controlled trial publication-title: Am J Emerg Med – year: 2010 ident: bb0075 article-title: Consort – volume: 72 start-page: 135 year: Aug 2018 end-page: 144.e3 ident: bb0070 article-title: Safety and efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for pain management in the Emergency Department: a systematic review publication-title: Ann Emerg Med – year: Dec 22, 2012 ident: bb0010 article-title: Basic science and clinical practice – volume: 10 start-page: 390 year: 2003 end-page: 392 ident: bb0100 article-title: Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department publication-title: Acad Emerg Med – volume: 12 start-page: 13 year: May 4 2012 ident: bb0055 article-title: Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department publication-title: BMC Urol – volume: 15 start-page: 441 year: 2003 end-page: 446 ident: bb0105 article-title: Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain publication-title: Emerg Med (Fremantle) – volume: 3 start-page: 1304 year: 2010 end-page: 1310 ident: bb0040 article-title: The role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in renal colic publication-title: Pharmaceuticals – volume: 328 start-page: 1401 year: 2004 ident: bb0035 article-title: Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic publication-title: BMJ – volume: 20 start-page: 30 year: Jan–Mar 2011 end-page: 36 ident: bb0080 article-title: A standardized pain management protocol improves timeliness of analgesia among emergency department patients with renal colic publication-title: Qual Manag Health Care – volume: 4 year: Feb 13 2014 ident: bb0005 article-title: Therapeutic approaches for renal colic in the emergency department: a review article publication-title: Anesth Pain Med – volume: 59 start-page: 61 year: 1987 end-page: 77 ident: bb0045 article-title: Adverse effects of opioid analgesic drugs publication-title: Br J Anaesth – volume: 33 start-page: 825 year: Nov 2016 end-page: 826 ident: bb0065 article-title: BET 2: usefulness of IV lidocaine in the treatment of renal colic publication-title: Emerg Med J – volume: 5 start-page: 256 year: Jun 29 2011 ident: bb0050 article-title: Parenteral lidocaine for treatment of intractable renal colic: a case series publication-title: J Med Case Rep – volume: 17 start-page: 6 year: 1999 end-page: 10 ident: bb0020 article-title: Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic publication-title: Am J Emerg Med – volume: 37 start-page: 1033 year: 2019 end-page: 1036 ident: bb0090 article-title: Comparison the analgesic effect of magnesium sulphate and ketorolac in the treatment of renal colic patients: double-blind clinical trial study publication-title: Am J Emerg Med – volume: 5 start-page: 165 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0110 article-title: Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with ketorolac and morphine in patient with acute renal colic; a triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial publication-title: Bull Emerg Trauma – volume: 74 start-page: 690 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0015 article-title: A comparison of intramuscular ketorolac and pethidine in the alleviation of renal colic publication-title: Br J Urol doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb07107.x – volume: 15 start-page: 441 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0105 article-title: Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain publication-title: Emerg Med (Fremantle) doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00499.x – volume: 59 start-page: 61 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0045 article-title: Adverse effects of opioid analgesic drugs publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/59.1.61 – volume: 328 start-page: 1401 issue: 7453 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0035 article-title: Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.38119.581991.55 – volume: 34 start-page: 443 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0060 article-title: Does lidocaine as an adjuvant to morphine improve pain relief in patients presenting to the ED with acute renal colic? A double-blind, randomized controlled trial publication-title: Am J Emerg Med doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.062 – volume: 33 start-page: 825 issue: 11 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0065 article-title: BET 2: usefulness of IV lidocaine in the treatment of renal colic publication-title: Emerg Med J doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206351.2 – ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0075 – volume: 48 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0030 article-title: Intravenous morphine plus ketorolac is superior to either drug alone for treatment of acute renal colic publication-title: Ann Emerg Med doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.013 – volume: 17 start-page: 261 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0025 article-title: A comparison of the efficacy and safety of morphine and pethidine as analgesia for suspected renal colic in the emergency setting publication-title: J Accid Emerg Med doi: 10.1136/emj.17.4.261 – volume: 5 start-page: 256 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0050 article-title: Parenteral lidocaine for treatment of intractable renal colic: a case series publication-title: J Med Case Rep doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-256 – volume: 12 start-page: 13 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0055 article-title: Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department publication-title: BMC Urol doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-13 – volume: 37 start-page: 1033 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0090 article-title: Comparison the analgesic effect of magnesium sulphate and ketorolac in the treatment of renal colic patients: double-blind clinical trial study publication-title: Am J Emerg Med doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.040 – volume: 72 start-page: 135 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0070 article-title: Safety and efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for pain management in the Emergency Department: a systematic review publication-title: Ann Emerg Med doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.12.014 – volume: 17 start-page: 6 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0020 article-title: Efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine versus meperidine in the ED treatment of acute renal colic publication-title: Am J Emerg Med doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90003-7 – volume: 70 start-page: 177 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0095 article-title: Comparison of intravenous ketorolac at three single-dose regimens for treating acute pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Ann Emerg Med doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.014 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0010 – volume: 7 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0085 article-title: Intranasal desmopressin compared with intravenous ketorolac for pain management of patients with renal colic referring to the emergency department: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: Anesth Pain Med doi: 10.5812/aapm.43595 – volume: 10 start-page: 390 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0100 article-title: Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department publication-title: Acad Emerg Med doi: 10.1197/aemj.10.4.390 – volume: 20 start-page: 30 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0080 article-title: A standardized pain management protocol improves timeliness of analgesia among emergency department patients with renal colic publication-title: Qual Manag Health Care doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31820429d9 – volume: 4 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0005 article-title: Therapeutic approaches for renal colic in the emergency department: a review article publication-title: Anesth Pain Med – volume: 3 start-page: 1304 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048_bb0040 article-title: The role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in renal colic publication-title: Pharmaceuticals doi: 10.3390/ph3051304 |
SSID | ssj0011454 |
Score | 2.3696213 |
Snippet | To compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal colic.... AbstractStudy objectiveTo compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with... Study objectiveTo compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with... To compare analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac combination to each analgesic alone for ED patients with suspected renal... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 165 |
SubjectTerms | Abdomen Analgesia Analgesics Anticoagulants Cardiovascular disease Contraindications Data collection Emergency Emergency Department Emergency medical care Enrollments Headache Hospitals Intravenous administration Ketorolac Kidneys Lidocaine Morphine Narcotics Nausea Pain Pain perception Patients Pharmacists Ulcers Vital signs |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Elsevier ScienceDirect dbid: .~1 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LaxsxEBYhh9BLadKX07So0FvZWqtdraxjcRJCIb20gdyEVhqBU7M2ttNT6W_PjFa7UJqk0IMvtmYla0Yz36zmwdiHiC4AFSIr2qZCB0XS_S5oU4SonWtLKSGQo3j5tbm4qr9cq-s9Nh9yYSisMuv-XqcnbZ2_mebdnK4Xi-k3FE6FcFcjBKGiNSmDvdYk5Z9-j2EeCPdTJzQaXNDonDjTx3i5G6Bs9NKk0p3UA-h-4_QQ-ExG6PwZe5rRI__cL_CQ7UF3xA4u8_34c_ZrPrYV5KvIF_Tm9meqwsqXi4Bmi6pi_AAqW7B0nuOfRsc48YbvVhwoP2PDXUe9P5B73C1XHXCEtXx7m1IyIfAN0Ao8lRPma3weTsKRjJ-dvmBX52ff5xdF7q9QeFU2uyJIIU0EhR8RonStjzPV1lE4JwQE45s6tAoB2sxXpnXKUFpurcALE5zzvnrJ9jtcx2vGG900AUrjPJp7aJxp9UzJKEJdVaaK1YSVw8Zan4uPUw-MpR2izG4sMcMSM6woLTJjwj6ONOu-9Majo6uBX3ZIKkU1aNEyPEql76OCbT7JW1varbTC_iVtE6ZGyj8E9p8zngzCZMdJEEbhI9EVxY16P_6MB51ub1wHKCaWGq8T4NBmwl71QjhuCypqjWCrPv7PRb1hTyS9R0jR6Cdsf7e5hbcItnbtu3Sa7gDPuCb6 priority: 102 providerName: Elsevier |
Title | Comparison of intravenous lidocaine/ketorolac combination to either analgesic alone for suspected renal colic pain in the ED |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0735675719300701 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0735675719300701 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.048 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30770244 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2417016253 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2229130379 |
Volume | 38 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3fb9MwED6xTUK8IMavZWyVkXhDgcSJ4_oJjdGpgFYhYFLfLMd2pI0q7ZqOJ7S_fXeJE15Geaj60F6c5M6-7-y77wDeVBgCEBFZXBYZBiiczne9VLGrpDFlyrl3FCiez4rpRf5lLuZhw60JaZX9mtgu1G5paY_8PXoaifCEi-zD6jqmrlF0uhpaaOzAHlGXUUqXnA8BF0L9tgsaWjEl2AsZima6_C5z5akSPVUtbSf1_7nfMf0LeLYO6OwJPA7IkZ10qt6HB75-Cg_Pw9n4M_hzOrQUZMuKXdKu7e-WgZUtLvH5DDFi_PJEWbAwluFTY1Dc6oVtlsxTbcaamZr6fqDmmFksa88Q0rLmpi3H9I6tPd2BJSphtsLr4SAMxdjk03O4OJv8PJ3GobdCbEVabGLHE64qL_CTuIqb0lZjUeZVYkySeKdskbtSIDgb20yVRigqyc2Ft4lyxlibvYDdGu_jAFghi8L5VBmLrt4XRpVyLHiVuDzLVFZlEaT9i9U2EI9T_4uF7jPMrjQpQ5MydJJqVEYEbweZVUe7sfXfWa8v3ReU4hKo0StslZL3SfkmzOJGp7rhOtE_yIDIfhDsEj1SGoEYJANQ6QDIf0c86o1JD4P8NewIXg8_4ySnkxtTezQTTU3XCWxIFcHLzgiH14KLtESglR9uv_greMRpq6BNOD-C3c36xh8jntqUI9h5d5uO2qkzgr2Tz1-nM_z-OJl9-34HZ9siNQ |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrQRcEG9SChgJTigiseNkfUAI2q22tLtC0Eq9uY7tSC2r7HazBSHxm_iNzOTFpSynHnJKxo7G45lvPJ4ZgFcFugBUiCzMU4EOCqf4rs9U6IrMmDzm3DtyFCfTdHycfDqRJxvwu8uFoWuVnU6sFbWbWzojf4uWJkN4wqV4v7gIqWsURVe7FhqNWBz4nz_QZave7e_i-r7mfG90tDMO264CoZVxugoduvuq8BKfyBXc5LYYyjwpImOiyDtl08TlEmHJ0AqVG6koGTWR3kbKGWOtwHFvwGYi0JUZwObH0fTzlz5uESd13zXcN3SlX2Ztmk5zo8yce8p9j1VdKJQ6Dl1tCv8FdWuTt3cX7rRYlX1ohOsebPjyPtyctNH4B_Brp29iyOYFO6Nz4u91zVc2O0OOGqrB8c1TkYSZsQz5jG54LQlsNWeeskGWzJTUaQRlhZnZvPQMQTSrLusEUO_Y0tMfWCpezBY4Hk7CkIyNdh_C8bXw_REMSvyPJ8DSLE2dj5WxCC58alSeDSUvIpcIoUQhAog7xmrbljqnjhsz3d1pO9e0GJoWQ0exxsUI4E1Ps2gKfaz9WnTrpbsUVlS6Gu3QWqrsKipftXqj0rGuuI70VxIgkh-E11SQKQ5A9pQtNGogz39n3O6ESfeT_N1KAbzsX6NaoViRKT2KiaY27wRvMhXA40YIe7agWcgQ2iVb6wd_AbfGR5NDfbg_PXgKtzkdVNTX3bdhsFpe-meI5lb583YLMTi97l37B6KfXjQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIlVcUHk2tICR4ISiJnEcrw8IoW5XLaUVElTam3H8kFpW2WWzBSHxy_h1zOTFpSynHnJKbEfjeXxjzwPgZUAXgAqRxWXB0UHJ6H7XSxW7II0p0yzzjhzF07Pi6Dx_PxXTDfjd58JQWGWvExtF7eaWzsj30dJIhCeZ4PuhC4v4OJ68XXyLqYMU3bT27TRaFjnxP3-g-1a_OR7jXr_Kssnh54OjuOswEFuRFqvYoeuvghf4JC5kprRhJMo8JMYkiXfKFrkrBUKUkeWqNEJRYmouvE2UM8ZajvPegtuSi5RkTE4HZw_djKYDG0oQBfcL2SXstLFl5tJTFnyqmpKh1HvoeqP4L9DbGL_JNtztUCt717LZPdjw1X3YOu3u5R_Ar4OhnSGbB3ZBJ8bfm-qvbHaBtDVUjeOrp3IJM2MZUhwd8oYn2GrOPOWFLJmpqOcIcg0zs3nlGcJpVl81qaDesaWnP7BUxpgtcD5chOEwdjh-COc3QvVHsFnhf-wAK2RROJ8qYxFm-MKoUo5EFhKXc6544BGkPWG17YqeU--Nme6j2y41bYamzdBJqnEzIng9jFm0JT_Wfs37_dJ9MiuqX40Wae0oed0oX3capNaprjOd6E_EQMQ_CLSpNFMagRhGdiCpBT__XXGvZyY9LPJXqCJ4MbxGBUO3RqbyyCaaGr4T0JEqgsctEw5kQQMhEeTlT9ZP_hy2UFb1h-Ozk124k9GJRRP3vgebq-WVf4qwblU-a-SHwZebFtg_8N5hBA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+intravenous+lidocaine%2Fketorolac+combination+to+either+analgesic+alone+for+suspected+renal+colic+pain+in+the+ED&rft.jtitle=The+American+journal+of+emergency+medicine&rft.au=Motov%2C+Sergey&rft.au=Fassassi%2C+Catsim&rft.au=Drapkin%2C+Jefferson&rft.au=Butt%2C+Mahlaqa&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Limited&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajem.2019.01.048&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F07356757%2FS0735675719X00133%2Fcov150h.gif |