The translation and validation of the surgical anxiety questionnaire into the modern standard Arabic language: results from classical test theory and item response theory analyses

Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC psychiatry Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 694 - 13
Main Authors Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed Abdullah, Alghuthayr, Khalid, Alqahtani, Saad Sh. S. M. M., Alshahrani, Ziyad Ali, Asiri, Abdullah Mohammed, Ghazzawi, Hadeel, Helmy, Mai, Trabelsi, Khaled, Husni, Mariwan, Jahrami, Haitham
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 16.10.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation techniques, and cognitive‒behavioral therapy to minimize anxiety. Few comprehensive psychiatric measures are available to assess preoperative anxiety in Arabic. Our study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) into the modern standard Arabic language, also known as Fusha al-Asr Arabic. To translate the questionnaire, the research team used the gold standard process of forward translation by two independent translators along with back translation evaluation by four trained medical doctors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey completed by 208 Arabic speakers (mean age 38 years, 44% women) from four countries. Psychometric analyses, which included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response analysis, were performed. Convergent validity tests were performed against the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-2), Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), and Arabic version of the Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A). The mean SAQ of our sample was 19.38 ± 12.63 (possible range 0-68). The Arabic SAQ translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald's omega and a Cronbach's alpha of approximately 0.90. The test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.94. The SAQ showed strong convergent validity against the GAD-2 (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). The SAQ also showed weak-moderate correlations with the PHQ-2 (r = 0.26, p < 0.01), PSS-4 (r = 43, p < 0.01), and VAS-A (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) scores. The original three-factor structure was supported by confirmatory factor analysis, confirming the original structure reported in the original English language version. The results for fitness indices showed acceptable preliminary results (CFI/TLI approximately 0.90), and deleting some items improved the model fit (CFI/TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08). We suggest retaining the original factorial solution until further validation studies can be conducted. The item response theory (IRT) results identified no items that were excessively difficult or subject to guessing. The multidimensional IRT provided evidence that the SAQ items form a multidimensional scale assessing surgical anxiety that fits the classical model reasonably well. The SAQ has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity; thus, it is a trustworthy and valid tool for evaluating preoperative anxiety in Arabic speakers. Future research could benefit from using the SAQ in both surgical and psychiatric research.
AbstractList Abstract Background Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation techniques, and cognitive‒behavioral therapy to minimize anxiety. Few comprehensive psychiatric measures are available to assess preoperative anxiety in Arabic. Objective Our study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) into the modern standard Arabic language, also known as Fusha al-Asr Arabic. Methods To translate the questionnaire, the research team used the gold standard process of forward translation by two independent translators along with back translation evaluation by four trained medical doctors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey completed by 208 Arabic speakers (mean age 38 years, 44% women) from four countries. Psychometric analyses, which included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response analysis, were performed. Convergent validity tests were performed against the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-2), Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), and Arabic version of the Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A). Results The mean SAQ of our sample was 19.38 ± 12.63 (possible range 0–68). The Arabic SAQ translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald’s omega and a Cronbach’s alpha of approximately 0.90. The test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.94. The SAQ showed strong convergent validity against the GAD-2 (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). The SAQ also showed weak-moderate correlations with the PHQ-2 (r = 0.26, p < 0.01), PSS-4 (r = 43, p < 0.01), and VAS-A (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) scores. The original three-factor structure was supported by confirmatory factor analysis, confirming the original structure reported in the original English language version. The results for fitness indices showed acceptable preliminary results (CFI/TLI approximately 0.90), and deleting some items improved the model fit (CFI/TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08). We suggest retaining the original factorial solution until further validation studies can be conducted. The item response theory (IRT) results identified no items that were excessively difficult or subject to guessing. The multidimensional IRT provided evidence that the SAQ items form a multidimensional scale assessing surgical anxiety that fits the classical model reasonably well. Conclusion The SAQ has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity; thus, it is a trustworthy and valid tool for evaluating preoperative anxiety in Arabic speakers. Future research could benefit from using the SAQ in both surgical and psychiatric research.
Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation techniques, and cognitive‒behavioral therapy to minimize anxiety. Few comprehensive psychiatric measures are available to assess preoperative anxiety in Arabic. Our study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) into the modern standard Arabic language, also known as Fusha al-Asr Arabic. To translate the questionnaire, the research team used the gold standard process of forward translation by two independent translators along with back translation evaluation by four trained medical doctors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey completed by 208 Arabic speakers (mean age 38 years, 44% women) from four countries. Psychometric analyses, which included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response analysis, were performed. Convergent validity tests were performed against the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-2), Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), and Arabic version of the Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A). The mean SAQ of our sample was 19.38 ± 12.63 (possible range 0-68). The Arabic SAQ translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald's omega and a Cronbach's alpha of approximately 0.90. The test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.94. The SAQ showed strong convergent validity against the GAD-2 (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). The SAQ also showed weak-moderate correlations with the PHQ-2 (r = 0.26, p < 0.01), PSS-4 (r = 43, p < 0.01), and VAS-A (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) scores. The original three-factor structure was supported by confirmatory factor analysis, confirming the original structure reported in the original English language version. The results for fitness indices showed acceptable preliminary results (CFI/TLI approximately 0.90), and deleting some items improved the model fit (CFI/TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08). We suggest retaining the original factorial solution until further validation studies can be conducted. The item response theory (IRT) results identified no items that were excessively difficult or subject to guessing. The multidimensional IRT provided evidence that the SAQ items form a multidimensional scale assessing surgical anxiety that fits the classical model reasonably well. The SAQ has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity; thus, it is a trustworthy and valid tool for evaluating preoperative anxiety in Arabic speakers. Future research could benefit from using the SAQ in both surgical and psychiatric research.
BackgroundPreoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation techniques, and cognitive‒behavioral therapy to minimize anxiety. Few comprehensive psychiatric measures are available to assess preoperative anxiety in Arabic.ObjectiveOur study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) into the modern standard Arabic language, also known as Fusha al-Asr Arabic.MethodsTo translate the questionnaire, the research team used the gold standard process of forward translation by two independent translators along with back translation evaluation by four trained medical doctors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey completed by 208 Arabic speakers (mean age 38 years, 44% women) from four countries. Psychometric analyses, which included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response analysis, were performed. Convergent validity tests were performed against the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-2), Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), and Arabic version of the Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A).ResultsThe mean SAQ of our sample was 19.38 ± 12.63 (possible range 0–68). The Arabic SAQ translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald’s omega and a Cronbach’s alpha of approximately 0.90. The test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.94. The SAQ showed strong convergent validity against the GAD-2 (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). The SAQ also showed weak-moderate correlations with the PHQ-2 (r = 0.26, p < 0.01), PSS-4 (r = 43, p < 0.01), and VAS-A (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) scores. The original three-factor structure was supported by confirmatory factor analysis, confirming the original structure reported in the original English language version. The results for fitness indices showed acceptable preliminary results (CFI/TLI approximately 0.90), and deleting some items improved the model fit (CFI/TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08). We suggest retaining the original factorial solution until further validation studies can be conducted. The item response theory (IRT) results identified no items that were excessively difficult or subject to guessing. The multidimensional IRT provided evidence that the SAQ items form a multidimensional scale assessing surgical anxiety that fits the classical model reasonably well.ConclusionThe SAQ has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity; thus, it is a trustworthy and valid tool for evaluating preoperative anxiety in Arabic speakers. Future research could benefit from using the SAQ in both surgical and psychiatric research.
Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation techniques, and cognitive-behavioral therapy to minimize anxiety. Few comprehensive psychiatric measures are available to assess preoperative anxiety in Arabic. Our study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) into the modern standard Arabic language, also known as Fusha al-Asr Arabic. To translate the questionnaire, the research team used the gold standard process of forward translation by two independent translators along with back translation evaluation by four trained medical doctors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey completed by 208 Arabic speakers (mean age 38 years, 44% women) from four countries. Psychometric analyses, which included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response analysis, were performed. Convergent validity tests were performed against the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-2), Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), and Arabic version of the Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A). The mean SAQ of our sample was 19.38 [+ or -] 12.63 (possible range 0-68). The Arabic SAQ translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald's omega and a Cronbach's alpha of approximately 0.90. The test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.94. The SAQ showed strong convergent validity against the GAD-2 (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). The SAQ also showed weak-moderate correlations with the PHQ-2 (r = 0.26, p < 0.01), PSS-4 (r = 43, p < 0.01), and VAS-A (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) scores. The original three-factor structure was supported by confirmatory factor analysis, confirming the original structure reported in the original English language version. The results for fitness indices showed acceptable preliminary results (CFI/TLI approximately 0.90), and deleting some items improved the model fit (CFI/TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08). We suggest retaining the original factorial solution until further validation studies can be conducted. The item response theory (IRT) results identified no items that were excessively difficult or subject to guessing. The multidimensional IRT provided evidence that the SAQ items form a multidimensional scale assessing surgical anxiety that fits the classical model reasonably well. The SAQ has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity; thus, it is a trustworthy and valid tool for evaluating preoperative anxiety in Arabic speakers. Future research could benefit from using the SAQ in both surgical and psychiatric research.
Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation techniques, and cognitive‒behavioral therapy to minimize anxiety. Few comprehensive psychiatric measures are available to assess preoperative anxiety in Arabic.BACKGROUNDPreoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation techniques, and cognitive‒behavioral therapy to minimize anxiety. Few comprehensive psychiatric measures are available to assess preoperative anxiety in Arabic.Our study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) into the modern standard Arabic language, also known as Fusha al-Asr Arabic.OBJECTIVEOur study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) into the modern standard Arabic language, also known as Fusha al-Asr Arabic.To translate the questionnaire, the research team used the gold standard process of forward translation by two independent translators along with back translation evaluation by four trained medical doctors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey completed by 208 Arabic speakers (mean age 38 years, 44% women) from four countries. Psychometric analyses, which included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response analysis, were performed. Convergent validity tests were performed against the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-2), Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), and Arabic version of the Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A).METHODSTo translate the questionnaire, the research team used the gold standard process of forward translation by two independent translators along with back translation evaluation by four trained medical doctors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey completed by 208 Arabic speakers (mean age 38 years, 44% women) from four countries. Psychometric analyses, which included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response analysis, were performed. Convergent validity tests were performed against the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-2), Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), and Arabic version of the Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A).The mean SAQ of our sample was 19.38 ± 12.63 (possible range 0-68). The Arabic SAQ translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald's omega and a Cronbach's alpha of approximately 0.90. The test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.94. The SAQ showed strong convergent validity against the GAD-2 (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). The SAQ also showed weak-moderate correlations with the PHQ-2 (r = 0.26, p < 0.01), PSS-4 (r = 43, p < 0.01), and VAS-A (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) scores. The original three-factor structure was supported by confirmatory factor analysis, confirming the original structure reported in the original English language version. The results for fitness indices showed acceptable preliminary results (CFI/TLI approximately 0.90), and deleting some items improved the model fit (CFI/TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08). We suggest retaining the original factorial solution until further validation studies can be conducted. The item response theory (IRT) results identified no items that were excessively difficult or subject to guessing. The multidimensional IRT provided evidence that the SAQ items form a multidimensional scale assessing surgical anxiety that fits the classical model reasonably well.RESULTSThe mean SAQ of our sample was 19.38 ± 12.63 (possible range 0-68). The Arabic SAQ translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald's omega and a Cronbach's alpha of approximately 0.90. The test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.94. The SAQ showed strong convergent validity against the GAD-2 (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). The SAQ also showed weak-moderate correlations with the PHQ-2 (r = 0.26, p < 0.01), PSS-4 (r = 43, p < 0.01), and VAS-A (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) scores. The original three-factor structure was supported by confirmatory factor analysis, confirming the original structure reported in the original English language version. The results for fitness indices showed acceptable preliminary results (CFI/TLI approximately 0.90), and deleting some items improved the model fit (CFI/TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08). We suggest retaining the original factorial solution until further validation studies can be conducted. The item response theory (IRT) results identified no items that were excessively difficult or subject to guessing. The multidimensional IRT provided evidence that the SAQ items form a multidimensional scale assessing surgical anxiety that fits the classical model reasonably well.The SAQ has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity; thus, it is a trustworthy and valid tool for evaluating preoperative anxiety in Arabic speakers. Future research could benefit from using the SAQ in both surgical and psychiatric research.CONCLUSIONThe SAQ has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity; thus, it is a trustworthy and valid tool for evaluating preoperative anxiety in Arabic speakers. Future research could benefit from using the SAQ in both surgical and psychiatric research.
Background Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of surgical anxiety allows healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients and implement psychosocial interventions such as counseling, relaxation techniques, and cognitive-behavioral therapy to minimize anxiety. Few comprehensive psychiatric measures are available to assess preoperative anxiety in Arabic. Objective Our study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ) into the modern standard Arabic language, also known as Fusha al-Asr Arabic. Methods To translate the questionnaire, the research team used the gold standard process of forward translation by two independent translators along with back translation evaluation by four trained medical doctors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey completed by 208 Arabic speakers (mean age 38 years, 44% women) from four countries. Psychometric analyses, which included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response analysis, were performed. Convergent validity tests were performed against the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-2), Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4), and Arabic version of the Visual Analog Scale for anxiety (VAS-A). Results The mean SAQ of our sample was 19.38 [+ or -] 12.63 (possible range 0-68). The Arabic SAQ translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald's omega and a Cronbach's alpha of approximately 0.90. The test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.94. The SAQ showed strong convergent validity against the GAD-2 (r = 0.94, p < 0.01). The SAQ also showed weak-moderate correlations with the PHQ-2 (r = 0.26, p < 0.01), PSS-4 (r = 43, p < 0.01), and VAS-A (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) scores. The original three-factor structure was supported by confirmatory factor analysis, confirming the original structure reported in the original English language version. The results for fitness indices showed acceptable preliminary results (CFI/TLI approximately 0.90), and deleting some items improved the model fit (CFI/TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08). We suggest retaining the original factorial solution until further validation studies can be conducted. The item response theory (IRT) results identified no items that were excessively difficult or subject to guessing. The multidimensional IRT provided evidence that the SAQ items form a multidimensional scale assessing surgical anxiety that fits the classical model reasonably well. Conclusion The SAQ has demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity; thus, it is a trustworthy and valid tool for evaluating preoperative anxiety in Arabic speakers. Future research could benefit from using the SAQ in both surgical and psychiatric research. Keywords: Anxiety measurement, Item response theory, Patient-reported outcomes, Preoperative anxiety, Surgical anxiety, Validity and reliability
ArticleNumber 694
Audience Academic
Author Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed Abdullah
Alghuthayr, Khalid
Alshahrani, Ziyad Ali
Helmy, Mai
Trabelsi, Khaled
Asiri, Abdullah Mohammed
Jahrami, Haitham
Alqahtani, Saad Sh. S. M. M.
Ghazzawi, Hadeel
Husni, Mariwan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Abdulmajeed Abdullah
  orcidid: 0009-0008-7053-8179
  surname: Alghamdi
  fullname: Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed Abdullah
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Khalid
  orcidid: 0009-0004-2552-9098
  surname: Alghuthayr
  fullname: Alghuthayr, Khalid
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Saad Sh. S. M. M.
  orcidid: 0009-0009-5345-6275
  surname: Alqahtani
  fullname: Alqahtani, Saad Sh. S. M. M.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ziyad Ali
  orcidid: 0009-0002-0893-2956
  surname: Alshahrani
  fullname: Alshahrani, Ziyad Ali
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Abdullah Mohammed
  orcidid: 0009-0002-9236-8883
  surname: Asiri
  fullname: Asiri, Abdullah Mohammed
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Hadeel
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3045-4153
  surname: Ghazzawi
  fullname: Ghazzawi, Hadeel
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Mai
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7649-1358
  surname: Helmy
  fullname: Helmy, Mai
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Khaled
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2623-9557
  surname: Trabelsi
  fullname: Trabelsi, Khaled
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Mariwan
  surname: Husni
  fullname: Husni, Mariwan
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Haitham
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8990-1320
  surname: Jahrami
  fullname: Jahrami, Haitham
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39415158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkstu1TAQhiNURC_wAixQJDZsUjyJE9ts0FHFpVIlNkViZzn2JPVRYhc7qTjPxQvi5JS2B6FIuXg-f8lM_tPsyHmHWfYayDkAb95HKDnnBSlpQRqgZbF7lp0AZVCUlP44enJ_nJ3GuCUEGK_hRXZcCQo11Pwk-319g_kUlIuDmqx3uXImv1ODNftH3-VTIuIceqvVkMq_LE67_OeMcQGcsgFz6ya_cqM3GFwep6RRweSboFqr80G5flY9fsgDxnmYYt4FP-Z6UDGu2inZFoEPu_UL7ITjwt56F_GxoIZdxPgye96pIeKr--tZ9v3zp-uLr8XVty-XF5urQqfepqJGYBVQWhsEDQ1pudbpBGh4WxOGhJbGJIS1mhrTkg5qoxqOQgjOWlpWZ9nl3mu82srbYEcVdtIrK9cFH3qpwmT1gFKpWgmmOyqwpKRteUOACE0ZMlFWzCTXx73rdm5HNBpdGvpwID2sOHsje38nASgHBk0yvLs3BL9OX442ahzSbNHPUVYArAFRNSKhb_9Bt34OaXoLVTbp3wsBj1SvUgfWdT69WC9SueFQ1pVoKpao8_9Q6TA4Wp0C2dm0frDhzdNOH1r8m7kElHtABx9jwO4BASKXYMt9sGUKtlyDLXfVHx3T7oA
Cites_doi 10.1101/2023.09.05.23295052
10.1186/s13037-019-0198-0
10.4324/9781003286929
10.1111/papr.13107
10.2344/0003-3006-58.1.8
10.1177/1359105317709512
10.1080/13548506.2021.1994619
10.1016/j.jopan.2022.06.014
10.18637/jss.v048.i06
10.4172/2161-0487.1000197
10.1186/s13741-023-00316-0
10.7759/cureus.28004
10.1016/j.jopan.2021.05.013
10.1016/j.jopan.2023.03.003
10.15761/GAPM.1000126
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005
10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265
10.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:1+<69::AID-DA9>3.0.CO;2-K
10.1186/1477-7525-8-57
10.1002/nur.21482
10.1111/bjop.12046
10.18637/jss.v048.i02
10.1016/j.jopan.2022.08.015
10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.019
10.1080/20008198.2021.1875642
10.3390/healthcare10030515
10.1186/s12888-021-03365-1
10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503
10.1080/08870446.2018.1502770
10.1186/s12871-018-0619-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2024 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
88G
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
K9.
M0S
M1P
M2M
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12888-024-06142-y
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
ProQuest - Psychology Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
Publicly Available Content Database

MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-244X
EndPage 13
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_aa5a97cf49e240bb860109c47e79237d
PMC11481716
A812539637
39415158
10_1186_s12888_024_06142_y
Genre Validation Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Africa
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Africa
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
AZQEC
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DWQXO
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPY
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M2M
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7TK
7XB
8FK
COVID
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-5e1731445de1c160b8cc0b81ed8b507e042dd1737bc4ddb0f15da68e99987b423
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-244X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:52 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:31:33 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:22:04 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 23:01:06 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:04:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:01:44 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:58 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:26:35 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Validity and reliability
Surgical anxiety
Anxiety measurement
Patient-reported outcomes
Preoperative anxiety
Item response theory
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c515t-5e1731445de1c160b8cc0b81ed8b507e042dd1737bc4ddb0f15da68e99987b423
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0003-3045-4153
0009-0004-2552-9098
0000-0001-8990-1320
0009-0009-5345-6275
0000-0003-2623-9557
0009-0002-9236-8883
0009-0008-7053-8179
0009-0002-0893-2956
0000-0002-7649-1358
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/3126415991?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 39415158
PQID 3126415991
PQPubID 44775
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_aa5a97cf49e240bb860109c47e79237d
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11481716
proquest_miscellaneous_3117619369
proquest_journals_3126415991
gale_infotracmisc_A812539637
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A812539637
pubmed_primary_39415158
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12888_024_06142_y
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-10-16
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-10-16
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-10-16
  day: 16
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC psychiatry
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Psychiatry
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References H Mulugeta (6142_CR9) 2018; 18
J Kaufman (6142_CR36) 2000; 12
APA (6142_CR1) 2013
A King (6142_CR12) 2019; 24
H Gürler (6142_CR6) 2022; 37
VS Williams (6142_CR28) 2010; 8
E Guadagnoli (6142_CR29) 1988; 103
6142_CR40
B Löwe (6142_CR17) 2010; 122
Y Rosseel (6142_CR35) 2012; 48
MA Bisby (6142_CR20) 2022; 22
6142_CR23
RA Alsalamah (6142_CR41) 2023; 15
S Sigdel (6142_CR3) 2015; 1
E Facco (6142_CR27) 2011; 58
RP Chalmers (6142_CR34) 2012; 48
S Akutay (6142_CR7) 2023; 12
D Burton (6142_CR5) 2019; 34
TJ Dunn (6142_CR30) 2014; 105
6142_CR8
MJ Warrens (6142_CR15) 2015; 5
F Karam (6142_CR25) 2012; 35
6142_CR37
6142_CR14
6142_CR16
6142_CR38
6142_CR2
HW Marsh (6142_CR32) 2020; 55
G Badawi (6142_CR42) 2011; 43
SA Abdulameer (6142_CR24) 2019; 19
K Kroenke (6142_CR18) 2009; 50
6142_CR31
N Moerman (6142_CR10) 1996; 82
6142_CR33
6142_CR13
E Facco (6142_CR26) 2013; 79
SY Topçu (6142_CR39) 2023; 38
C Zhang (6142_CR11) 2021; 21
NF BinDhim (6142_CR19) 2021; 12
A Bedaso (6142_CR4) 2019; 13
S Kliem (6142_CR22) 2016; 66
F Plummer (6142_CR21) 2016; 39
References_xml – ident: 6142_CR23
  doi: 10.1101/2023.09.05.23295052
– volume: 13
  start-page: 18
  year: 2019
  ident: 6142_CR4
  publication-title: Patient Saf Surg
  doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0198-0
– ident: 6142_CR33
  doi: 10.4324/9781003286929
– volume: 22
  start-page: 478
  issue: 4
  year: 2022
  ident: 6142_CR20
  publication-title: Pain Pract
  doi: 10.1111/papr.13107
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1389
  issue: 12
  year: 2013
  ident: 6142_CR26
  publication-title: Minerva Anestesiol
– ident: 6142_CR16
– volume: 58
  start-page: 8
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 6142_CR27
  publication-title: Anesth Prog
  doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-58.1.8
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1897
  issue: 13
  year: 2019
  ident: 6142_CR12
  publication-title: J Health Psychol
  doi: 10.1177/1359105317709512
– ident: 6142_CR38
  doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1994619
– volume: 38
  start-page: 127
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 6142_CR39
  publication-title: J Perianesth Nurs
  doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.06.014
– volume: 15
  start-page: e39577
  issue: 5
  year: 2023
  ident: 6142_CR41
  publication-title: Cureus
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 6142_CR34
  publication-title: J Stat Softw
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 6142_CR15
  publication-title: J Psychol Psychother
  doi: 10.4172/2161-0487.1000197
– volume: 12
  start-page: 22
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 6142_CR7
  publication-title: Perioper Med (Lond)
  doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00316-0
– ident: 6142_CR14
  doi: 10.7759/cureus.28004
– volume: 37
  start-page: 69
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 6142_CR6
  publication-title: J PeriAnesthesia Nurs
  doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.05.013
– ident: 6142_CR37
  doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2023.03.003
– volume: 1
  start-page: 107
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 6142_CR3
  publication-title: Glob Anesth Perioper Med
  doi: 10.15761/GAPM.1000126
– volume: 39
  start-page: 24
  year: 2016
  ident: 6142_CR21
  publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005
– volume: 103
  start-page: 265
  issue: 2
  year: 1988
  ident: 6142_CR29
  publication-title: Psychol Bull
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265
– volume: 12
  start-page: 69
  issue: S1
  year: 2000
  ident: 6142_CR36
  publication-title: Depress Anxiety
  doi: 10.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:1+<69::AID-DA9>3.0.CO;2-K
– volume: 8
  start-page: 57
  year: 2010
  ident: 6142_CR28
  publication-title: Health Qual Life Outcomes
  doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-57
– volume: 35
  start-page: 363
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 6142_CR25
  publication-title: Res Nurs Health
  doi: 10.1002/nur.21482
– volume: 105
  start-page: 399
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 6142_CR30
  publication-title: Br J Psychol
  doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046
– ident: 6142_CR2
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 6142_CR35
  publication-title: J Stat Softw
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
– ident: 6142_CR13
– ident: 6142_CR40
  doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.08.015
– volume: 43
  start-page: 134
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 6142_CR42
  publication-title: J ima
– volume: 122
  start-page: 86
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2010
  ident: 6142_CR17
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.019
– ident: 6142_CR31
– volume: 82
  start-page: 445
  issue: 3
  year: 1996
  ident: 6142_CR10
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1875642
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 6142_CR19
  publication-title: Eur J Psychotraumatol
  doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1875642
– volume: 50
  start-page: 613
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 6142_CR18
  publication-title: Psychosomatics
– ident: 6142_CR8
  doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030515
– volume: 21
  start-page: 358
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 6142_CR11
  publication-title: BMC Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03365-1
– volume: 55
  start-page: 102
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 6142_CR32
  publication-title: Multivar Behav Res
  doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503
– volume-title: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5™
  year: 2013
  ident: 6142_CR1
– volume: 34
  start-page: 129
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 6142_CR5
  publication-title: Psychol Health
  doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1502770
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 6142_CR9
  publication-title: BMC Anesthesiol
  doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0619-0
– volume: 19
  start-page: 10
  year: 2019
  ident: 6142_CR24
  publication-title: Pharm Educ
– volume: 66
  start-page: 385
  issue: 9–10
  year: 2016
  ident: 6142_CR22
  publication-title: Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol
SSID ssj0017851
Score 2.4012883
Snippet Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources of...
Background Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources...
BackgroundPreoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding the sources...
Abstract Background Preoperative anxiety is commonly found in patients who are waiting for surgery and can lead to negative surgical outcomes. Understanding...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 694
SubjectTerms Accuracy
Adult
Anxiety
Anxiety - diagnosis
Anxiety - psychology
Anxiety disorders
Anxiety measurement
Arabic language
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Cognitive therapy
Counseling
Cross-Sectional Studies
Evaluation
Factor analysis
Fear & phobias
Female
Health surveys
Heart rate
Humans
Interpreters
Item response theory
Kappa coefficient
Language
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Patient outcomes
Patient-reported outcomes
Patients
Physiology
Preoperative anxiety
Psychological aspects
Psychological tests
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Relaxation
Reproducibility of Results
Surgery
Surgical anxiety
Surgical outcomes
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Translating
Translation
Translations
Translations and translating
Validity
Validity and reliability
Worry
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD4gLopRHaKmMhMQBRV1v7MThViqqqlI5Uak3y6-IlSCLmqzE_i7-IN84ybIRBy5cdqWdSdbxjGe-ccYzjL3VVrmol03eLINGgKKKXMNN5ctCiVAJBxdNZ4dvPpdXt_L6Tt3ttfqinLChPPAwcWfWKltXvpF1hPNxTlMEUXtZRap8VwWyvvB5UzA1vj-glvPTERldnnWwwtAI-CPqZCCX-XbmhlK1_r9t8p5TmidM7nmgyyfs8Qgd-fkw5EP2ILZP2cOb8eX4EfsFkfOefM-Q38ZtGzgUaTW0TeLrhgPt8W5zn6wdyD8pYZOnUYChtTB_fNX268T3PXVJ49NeA_7XupXn0wbnB45AffOt7zidUOGeUHi6LbBrz9P5yG0aAe0OEy-l4sY_BKqFErtn7Pby05eLq3zsyZB7IJ8-V1FUBYIwFaLwolw47T0-RAzaAVpG2IAQwFI5L0Nwi0aoYEsdgUN15YDdnrODdt3Gl4zrYIV1El8xyNg4qA3COVlS21BfS52x95OIzI-h9IZJIYsuzSBQA4GaJFCzzdhHkuKOk8pmpx-gTGZUJvMvZcrYO9IBQ4sb8vJ2PKOAAVOZLHMOOKQK2KwqYyczTixKPydPWmRGo9CZQgB9Aj7WImNvdmS6khLd2rjeEI-gjaWirDP2YlC63SMVtST4iYnRM3WcPfOc0q6-ppLhFPVSYaRX_2OWjtkjAOcFeXBRnrCD_n4TXwOa9e40rcLfbHA5zA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Li9RAEG50BfEivo2u0oLgQcJuJ52k40VWcVmE9eTC3Jp-RQc0WScZcH6Xf9CvOsnsBsHLDEzVTDpT1VVfVaqrGHutTGGDypq0ybxCgFLkqYKbSrO8EL4SFi6azg6ffynPLuTnVbGaEm79VFY528RoqH3nKEd-lAu4bvjeWry__JXS1Ch6ujqN0LjJblHrMirpqlb7gCsOnp8PyqjyqIcthl7AK9E8A5mlu4Uzij37_7XM11zTsmzymh86vcfuTgCSn4wSv89uhPYBu30-PSJ_yP5A8HwgDzRWuXHTeg51Wo_Dk3jXcGA-3m830eaB_JvKNnlcBRhaAyPI1-3QRb6fcVYanzMOuK6xa8fnNOc7jnB9-2PoOZ1T4Y6wePxZINiBx1OSu7gCyhETLxXkhisCdUQJ_SN2cfrp68ezdJrMkDrgnyEtgqhyhGKFD8KJ8tgq5_AiglcWADPAEngPlso66b09bkThTakC0KiqLBDcY3bQdm14yrjyRhgr8Ra8DI2F8iCokyUND3W1VAl7O4tIX44NOHQMXFSpR4FqCFRHgepdwj6QFPec1Dw7ftBtvulpL2pjClNXrpF1AJ6xVlFQWjtZBWqmWPmEvSEd0LTFIS9nppMKWDA1y9InAEVFDstVJexwwYmt6ZbkWYv0ZBp6faXICXu1J9M3qdytDd2WeASll_KyTtiTUen2t5TXkkAo_hi1UMfFPS8p7fp7bBxOsS-1R3r2_3U9Z3cy2iRUt1MesoNhsw0vAL0G-zLur7_Z9TGK
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title The translation and validation of the surgical anxiety questionnaire into the modern standard Arabic language: results from classical test theory and item response theory analyses
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39415158
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3126415991
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3117619369
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11481716
https://doaj.org/article/aa5a97cf49e240bb860109c47e79237d
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwdV3ra9swED_6gNIvY-9564IGg30Y3qpYtuTBGM1oKYOUURYI-yKsh7tA57SJA83ftX9wd7Kd1qz74kB0tmXf63fy6Q7grSpS49WwjMuhUxigpEms0E3FwyTlTnKDLpr2Do_PstOJ-DZNp1vQtTtqX-Dy3tCO-klNFpcfbq7XX1DhPweFV9nHJdpY5Dd6G-pTIIbxeht20TNJUtSxuP2qQI3ou40z9563D3tJLsjHq56fCuX8_zXad7xWP6Pyjos6eQgPWmzJjhpheARbvnoMe-P26_kT-IMywWpyTk0CHCsqx1DSZk1fJTYvGcJBtlwtgjnE4RvK6GRhFkhQFWgf2ayq54Hud2ijxrrFCLxvYWaWdSugnxhG8qvLesloCwuzBNPDZRHc1ixsoFyHGdDyMdFSrq6_HaBiKX75FCYnxz--nsZt04bY4mur49RzmWCUljrPLc8OjbIWD9w7ZRB7ejQSziGJNFY4Zw5LnroiUx6BqpIGwd0z2KnmlX8BTLmCF0bgj3fClwblCuM9kVFfUZsLFcH7jkX6qqnNoUNMozLd8FYjb3XgrV5HMCIubiiprnb4Y7640K2a6qJIi1zaUuQeoY4xiuLV3Arpqc6idBG8IxnQJI_IL1u0mxhwwlRHSx8hXkoTNGoygoMeJWqt7Q93UqQ7odcJR3iK-DLnEbzZDNOZlAlX-fmKaDitPCVZHsHzRug2j9TJbgSqJ469Z-6PVLNfoaY4hcVUOenlfy_6CvaHpCqUzZMdwE69WPnXCMhqM4BtOZUD2B0dn30_H4RljUHQPDyej37-BUmhOV0
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9RAFB7KFtQX8W606giKDxLaSSbJRBBptWVru4tIC32bzi260CZ1k0X3T_niH_ScSbJtEHzryy7snCSTPd-cy8y5EPJKqEQ7ERVhEVkBDkoShwLUVBjFCbMZ06CiMXd4Mk3Hx_zzSXKyRn73uTAYVtnLRC-obWVwj3wzZqC6Qffm7MPFjxC7RuHpat9Co4XFgVv-BJetfr__Cfj7Oor2do8-jsOuq0BoQHc3YeJYFoMbkVjHDEu3tDAGPpizQoNx5ADF1gJJpg23Vm8VLLEqFQ4sKZFpjoUOQOSv8xhcmRFZ39mdfvm6OrfAVvd9ao5IN2uQ_oBE0IPYQYFH4XKg_nyXgH91wRVlOAzUvKL59u6Q253JSrdbjN0la668R25MukP5--QPQI02qPPauDqqSksBwLO2XROtCgpWJq0Xcy9lYfgXBopSPwsgKBWIXTorm8rTnfvubLTf44DnKj0ztN9YfUfnrl6cNTXFzBhq0Pr3twWbuaE-L3PpZ4C70kiLIcDucgBrsLj6ATm-Fq49JKOyKt1jQoVVTGkOX85yV2iAK7iRPMV2pSbnIiBvexbJi7bkh_Sukkhly1AJDJWeoXIZkB3k4ooSy3X7H6r5N9mtfqlUovLMFDx3YEFpLdANzg3PHJZvzGxA3iAGJAoV4JdRXW4ETBjLc8ltMMOSGGRlFpCNASUIAzMc7lEkO2FUy8ulE5CXq2G8EgPsSlctkIbhhlac5gF51IJu9UpxztHshT9GDOA4eOfhSDn77kuVo7eNBZme_H9eL8jN8dHkUB7uTw-eklsRLhiMGko3yKiZL9wzMPwa_bxbbZScXvcC_wtpAm-B
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+translation+and+validation+of+the+surgical+anxiety+questionnaire+into+the+modern+standard+Arabic+language%3A+results+from+classical+test+theory+and+item+response+theory+analyses&rft.jtitle=BMC+psychiatry&rft.au=Alghamdi%2C+Abdulmajeed+Abdullah&rft.au=Alghuthayr%2C+Khalid&rft.au=Alqahtani%2C+Saad+Sh+S+M+M&rft.au=Alshahrani%2C+Ziyad+Ali&rft.date=2024-10-16&rft.eissn=1471-244X&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=694&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12888-024-06142-y&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39415158&rft.externalDocID=39415158
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-244X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-244X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-244X&client=summon