Chinese dentists’ restorative preferences and choices for endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey

The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ens...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC oral health Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 1489 - 9
Main Authors Li, Wenhui, Zheng, Ziting, Zeng, Yuting, Zhou, Zhiyan, Xiao, Ping, Zhong, Xincen, Yan, Wenjuan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 18.12.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies. A validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold. A total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth's structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants' knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05). The clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT.
AbstractList The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies. A validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold. A total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth's structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants' knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05). The clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT.
The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies.BACKGROUNDThe optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies.A validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold.METHODSA validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold.A total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth's structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants' knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05).RESULTSA total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth's structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants' knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05).The clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT.CONCLUSIONSThe clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT.
BackgroundThe optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies.MethodsA validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold.ResultsA total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth’s structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants’ knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT.
Abstract Background The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies. Methods A validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold. Results A total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth’s structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants’ knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05). Conclusions The clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT.
Background The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies. Methods A validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold. Results A total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth's structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants' knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05). Conclusions The clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT. Keywords: Surveys and questionnaires, Endodontically treated teeth, Dental restoration, Endocrown, Dental practitioners
The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies. A validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold. A total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth's structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants' knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05). The clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT.
ArticleNumber 1489
Audience Academic
Author Xiao, Ping
Zhong, Xincen
Zeng, Yuting
Zhou, Zhiyan
Yan, Wenjuan
Zheng, Ziting
Li, Wenhui
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Wenhui
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Wenhui
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ziting
  surname: Zheng
  fullname: Zheng, Ziting
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yuting
  surname: Zeng
  fullname: Zeng, Yuting
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zhiyan
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Zhiyan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ping
  surname: Xiao
  fullname: Xiao, Ping
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Xincen
  surname: Zhong
  fullname: Zhong, Xincen
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Wenjuan
  surname: Yan
  fullname: Yan, Wenjuan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39696168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkstu1DAUhi1URNuBF2CBIrFhk-JbHIcNqioulSqxgbXl2CczHmXsqZ0ZaXa8Bq_Hk3CmU0YdhLKI5Xznyzn2f0nOYopAyGtGrxjT6n1hvKOiplzWtOGsrfkzcsFky2ulBTt7sj4nl6UsKWWtlvIFORed6hRT-oLc3yxChAKVhziFMpXfP39VGcqUsp3CFqp1hgEyRAelstFXbpHCfj2kXEH0ySesc3Ycd9WUwU7gqwlgWnyoLHqwuqD4oCqbvIXdS_J8sGOBV4_vGfnx-dP3m6_13bcvtzfXd7VrWDPVkmpNqR16p8Bq7xVvXaud75ztnO7bRthBiqYdvKXQeADFmfK27Zm0emBczMjtweuTXZp1DiubdybZYB42Up4bm7H1EUznlNKgZGulkwq63nNGPZdCK9ajGl0fD671pl-BdzhStuOJ9PRLDAszT1vDmGo0xWZn5N2jIaf7DZ6vWYXiYBxthLQpRuBdMcEl36Nv_0GXaZMjnhVSDcebU9jakZpbnCDEIeGP3V5qrjXHPCApkLr6D4WPh1VwGKch4P5JwZunkx5H_JsYBPgBcDmVguE4IoyafSzNIZYGY2keYmm4-AMfn9cS
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.009
10.1111/iej.13796
10.1111/jopr.12671
10.1002/jdd.13236
10.5395/rde.2018.43.e38
10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.028
10.3390/dj6030044
10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.27
10.1111/iej.12538
10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60146-1
10.1007/s00058-008-0135-6
10.1155/2018/1581952
10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.007
10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.020
10.17096/jiufd.71363
10.1111/iej.13438
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.011
10.1111/aej.12002
10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.489
10.3390/ma16020764
10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016005218.x
10.1111/jopr.13735
10.2341/18-161-L
10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00296
10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.029
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103401
10.3390/ijerph19031794
10.1186/s13063-019-3530-1
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104975
10.1111/iej.13040
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.005
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.009
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.005
10.3390/jfb14050276
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.008
10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.002
10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.030
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2024 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7X7
7XB
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12903-024-05217-2
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
Publicly Available Content Database


MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Dentistry
Education
EISSN 1472-6831
EndPage 9
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_9c668e647a4c46e9bd210d243861bdee
PMC11658075
A820525263
39696168
10_1186_s12903_024_05217_2
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Clinical Research Program of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
  grantid: 2018CR018
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
34H
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
IVC
KQ8
LK8
M1P
M48
M7P
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7QP
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-408800afbc6ea8dd627c78cd9ca9c8b753af4357fda0e5dee6216da7b14a8f123
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1472-6831
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 00:58:15 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:30:26 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 10:48:50 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:03:41 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:59:43 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:05:32 EDT 2025
Sun Mar 30 02:12:47 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:19:12 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Endodontically treated teeth
Surveys and questionnaires
Dental restoration
Dental practitioners
Endocrown
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c515t-408800afbc6ea8dd627c78cd9ca9c8b753af4357fda0e5dee6216da7b14a8f123
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12903-024-05217-2
PMID 39696168
PQID 3152696624
PQPubID 42535
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9c668e647a4c46e9bd210d243861bdee
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11658075
proquest_miscellaneous_3147132425
proquest_journals_3152696624
gale_infotracmisc_A820525263
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A820525263
pubmed_primary_39696168
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_05217_2
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-12-18
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-12-18
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-12-18
  day: 18
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC oral health
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Oral Health
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References M Soliman (5217_CR19) 2021; 28
AA Madfa (5217_CR21) 2023; 15
5217_CR23
K Olcay (5217_CR28) 2018; 44
J Sun (5217_CR38) 2019; 20
T Dammaschke (5217_CR29) 2013; 39
EJ Kramer (5217_CR5) 2019; 52
5217_CR26
NR Dartora (5217_CR12) 2021; 125
5217_CR22
5217_CR9
5217_CR8
T Linnemann (5217_CR6) 2021; 47
MI Karobari (5217_CR24) 2023; 87
M Hawthan (5217_CR2) 2024; 33
M Naumann (5217_CR27) 2006; 96
RA Al-Dabbagh (5217_CR10) 2021; 125
N Al-Nuaimi (5217_CR31) 2017; 20
D Pedrollo Lise (5217_CR39) 2017; 59
L Tronstad (5217_CR30) 2000; 16
B Bhuva (5217_CR3) 2021; 54
R Hampe (5217_CR17) 2019; 44
G Dartora (5217_CR42) 2019; 100
5217_CR14
5217_CR36
E Monsef (5217_CR25) 2024; 145
5217_CR37
NR da Silva (5217_CR7) 2010; 104
5217_CR33
G Sevimli (5217_CR35) 2015; 49
F Mannocci (5217_CR4) 2022; 55
J Guo (5217_CR13) 2016; 8
L Dotto (5217_CR20) 2024; 131
MB Blatz (5217_CR15) 2019; 63
DS AlDabeeb (5217_CR34) 2023; 15
M Einhorn (5217_CR40) 2019; 28
IL Aurélio (5217_CR32) 2016; 49
AA AlHelal (5217_CR41) 2024; 68
5217_CR16
A Awada (5217_CR18) 2015; 114
S Eliyas (5217_CR1) 2015; 218
K Tzimas (5217_CR11) 2018; 43
References_xml – volume: 47
  start-page: 577
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  ident: 5217_CR6
  publication-title: J Endod
  doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.009
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1059
  issue: Suppl 4
  year: 2022
  ident: 5217_CR4
  publication-title: Int Endod J
  doi: 10.1111/iej.13796
– volume: 28
  start-page: e237
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 5217_CR40
  publication-title: J Prosthodont
  doi: 10.1111/jopr.12671
– volume: 87
  start-page: 1089
  issue: 8
  year: 2023
  ident: 5217_CR24
  publication-title: J Dent Educ
  doi: 10.1002/jdd.13236
– volume: 43
  start-page: e38
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 5217_CR11
  publication-title: Restor Dent Endod
  doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e38
– volume: 96
  start-page: 332
  issue: 5
  year: 2006
  ident: 5217_CR27
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.028
– ident: 5217_CR26
  doi: 10.3390/dj6030044
– volume: 218
  start-page: 53
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 5217_CR1
  publication-title: Br Dent J
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.27
– volume: 49
  start-page: 827
  issue: 9
  year: 2016
  ident: 5217_CR32
  publication-title: Int Endod J
  doi: 10.1111/iej.12538
– volume: 104
  start-page: 306
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 5217_CR7
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60146-1
– ident: 5217_CR36
  doi: 10.1007/s00058-008-0135-6
– ident: 5217_CR37
  doi: 10.1155/2018/1581952
– volume: 59
  start-page: 54
  year: 2017
  ident: 5217_CR39
  publication-title: J Dent
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.007
– volume: 28
  start-page: 6523
  issue: 11
  year: 2021
  ident: 5217_CR19
  publication-title: Saudi J Biol Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.020
– ident: 5217_CR33
– volume: 49
  start-page: 57
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 5217_CR35
  publication-title: J Istanb Univ Fac Dent
  doi: 10.17096/jiufd.71363
– volume: 15
  start-page: e49838
  issue: 12
  year: 2023
  ident: 5217_CR21
  publication-title: Cureus
– volume: 54
  start-page: 509
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  ident: 5217_CR3
  publication-title: Int Endod J
  doi: 10.1111/iej.13438
– volume: 125
  start-page: 415
  issue: 3
  year: 2021
  ident: 5217_CR10
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.011
– volume: 39
  start-page: 48
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: 5217_CR29
  publication-title: Aust Endod J
  doi: 10.1111/aej.12002
– volume: 8
  start-page: 489
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 5217_CR13
  publication-title: J Adv Prosthodont
  doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.489
– ident: 5217_CR16
  doi: 10.3390/ma16020764
– volume: 16
  start-page: 218
  issue: 5
  year: 2000
  ident: 5217_CR30
  publication-title: Endod Dent Traumatol
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016005218.x
– volume: 33
  start-page: 110
  issue: 2
  year: 2024
  ident: 5217_CR2
  publication-title: J Prosthodont
  doi: 10.1111/jopr.13735
– volume: 44
  start-page: E190
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  ident: 5217_CR17
  publication-title: Oper Dent
  doi: 10.2341/18-161-L
– volume: 68
  start-page: 50
  issue: 1
  year: 2024
  ident: 5217_CR41
  publication-title: J Prosthodont Res
  doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00296
– volume: 44
  start-page: 38
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 5217_CR28
  publication-title: J Endod
  doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.029
– volume: 100
  start-page: 103401
  year: 2019
  ident: 5217_CR42
  publication-title: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103401
– ident: 5217_CR23
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031794
– volume: 15
  start-page: e49947
  issue: 12
  year: 2023
  ident: 5217_CR34
  publication-title: Cureus
– volume: 20
  start-page: 454
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 5217_CR38
  publication-title: Trials
  doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3530-1
– volume: 145
  start-page: 104975
  year: 2024
  ident: 5217_CR25
  publication-title: J Dent
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104975
– volume: 52
  start-page: 569
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 5217_CR5
  publication-title: Int Endod J
  doi: 10.1111/iej.13040
– volume: 114
  start-page: 587
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 5217_CR18
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
– volume: 20
  start-page: 377
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 5217_CR31
  publication-title: Int J Comput Dent
– ident: 5217_CR8
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.005
– ident: 5217_CR9
  doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.009
– ident: 5217_CR22
  doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.005
– ident: 5217_CR14
  doi: 10.3390/jfb14050276
– volume: 125
  start-page: 117
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 5217_CR12
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.008
– volume: 63
  start-page: 175
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 5217_CR15
  publication-title: Dent Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.002
– volume: 131
  start-page: 1043
  issue: 6
  year: 2024
  ident: 5217_CR20
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.030
SSID ssj0017844
Score 2.3483713
Snippet The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness,...
Background The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of...
BackgroundThe optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of...
Abstract Background The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1489
SubjectTerms Adult
Age composition
Age groups
Attitude of Health Personnel
China
Clinical medicine
Composite materials
Decision making
Dental practitioners
Dental restoration
Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods
Dentistry
Dentists
Dentists - psychology
East Asian People
Education
Endocrown
Endodontically treated teeth
Endodontics
Female
Humans
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Practice
Practice Patterns, Dentists' - statistics & numerical data
Preferences
Professional ethics
Professionals
Questionnaires
Risk factors
Statistical analysis
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teeth
Tooth, Nonvital - therapy
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Jb9UwELZQD8AFQdkCBRkJiQOyGjvewq0sVYVUTlTqzfIWFQml7UseUm_8Df4ev4QZJ-_pRRy4cI2dKJ7FM2PPfEPI64yQ6CEIlk2wTHZ1zbzlHRMixbaOSqWEBc6nX_TJmfx8rs53Wn1hTtgEDzwR7rCNWtuspfEySp3bkCBISUI2VvOQcsbdF2zeJpia7w-MlXJTImP14YCnLXhfKRkWqxomFmaooPX_vSfvGKVlwuSOBTq-T-7NriM9mn75AbmV-31y5yOm-2DHtn1y-3S-KH9IrrEvdh4yTdPw8PvnL7oqXWQK0je92vYXGajvE4VdELcMCj4szX2CYLUvp9zfb2jJRc-JjjmPF--opwUIcy5agk8N69WPfPOInB1_-vrhhM3dFVgEH2aEwBFUt_ZdiDp7m5IWJhobUxt9G22AMMZ34EuZLvk6K6C0FlwnbwKX3nZg8B6Tvf6yz08JTY2IwCBjlO6kUiLopvN4pc1TF3mjKvJ2Q2x3NYFouBJ8WO0m1jhgjSuscaIi75Ef25kIgF0egFi4WSzcv8SiIm-Qmw7VFFgW_VxtAD-MgFfuCDwfJZTQTUUOFjNBveJyeCMPblbvwTUcG7NrLWRFXm2H8U1MWevz5RrngN1HdxWW_2QSn-2SGsQk4tpWxC4Ea7Hm5Uj_7aKAfyNcEgJIP_sfVHpO7gpUCi4Ytwdkb1yt8wtwssbwsujTH9qrJzA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagSNALguUVKMhISBxQ1NhxbIcLKo-qQionKu3NcmyHIqHsdpOt1Bt_g7_HL2HG8YZGSFxj78bOPDwznvmGkFcBIdGbhudBNToXbVHkVrM259y7unBV5T0WOJ9-kSdn4vOyWqaAW5_SKnc6MSpqv3IYIz8sGfbClpKLd-uLHLtG4e1qaqFxk9xC6DJM6VLLyeFiSguxK5TR8rDHmAveWoocS1ZVzmeHUcTs_1czXzua5mmT186h43vkbjIg6dFI8fvkRugW5M5HTPrBvm0L7MOccjYW5PZpujp_QC6wU3boA_Xj1P73z190E_vKROxvup46jvTUdp6CXkQlQsGqpaHz4L52Me7944rG7PTg6RDCcP6WWhqhMVMZE_xVv91chquH5Oz409cPJ3nqt5A7sGoGcCVBmAvbNk4Gq72XXDmlna-drZ1uwLGxLVhXqvW2CJUPQXImvVUNE1a3cAQ-InvdqgtPCPUld0JZpSrZiqrijSxbi5fczLeOlVVG3uw-vFmPsBomuiNampFMBshkIpkMz8h7pM00EyGx44PV5ptJEmZqJ6UOEt4qnJChbjx4s56LUkvWwGIz8hopa1BwgXzOpvoDWDBCYJkjsIUqDkxWZuRgNhMEzs2Hd7xhksD35i97ZuTlNIy_xCS2Lqy2OAcsATRgYfuPR1aatlQiShGTOiN6xmSzPc9Huu_nEQ4cAZQQUvrp_9f1jOxzZH3Gc6YPyN6w2YbnYFANzYsoNX8AuwEiRQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Chinese dentists’ restorative preferences and choices for endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39696168
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3152696624
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3147132425
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11658075
https://doaj.org/article/9c668e647a4c46e9bd210d243861bdee
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Rb9MwELbGJo29IBgwAqMyEhIPKNA4ju0iIbTCpgmpE5qoVPFiObbDkKZ0a1JE3_gb_D1-CXdOUhqxJ17yENuJ7bvz3dm-7wh57hESPc9Z7GWuYl4Mh7FRSREz5uxoaLPMOQxwnpyJ0yn_OMtmW6RLd9ROYHWja4f5pKaLy1c_rlfvQODfBoFX4nWFeyl4GsljDEWVMSzJO6CZJArqhP89VZCK8y5w5sZ2e2Q3RbiYBJFXN_RUgPP_d9He0Fr9G5UbKurkLrnT2pb0qGGGe2TLl_vk9ge8D4Qp3fbJ7qQ9Sb9PrjFxtq88dU1x9fvnL7oIaWYCFDi9WicgqagpHYWZwjWFgpFLfenAmy3DNvjliobL6t7R2vv64g01NCBltlFN8KlqufjuVw_I9OT48_vTuE2_EFswcmrwLEG2h6bIrfBGOSeYtFJZN7JmZFUOfo4pwNiShTNDnznvBUuEMzJPuFEFaMSHZLucl_4RoS5llksjZSYKnmUsF2lh8Mw7cYVN0iwiL7vJ1lcNyoYO3okSuqGSBirpQCXNIjJGeqxrIkJ2eDFffNWtwOmRFUJ5AX_llgs_yh04t47xVIkkh85G5AVSUyNnAcmsacMRoMOIiKWPwDTKWMZEGpHDXk2QP9sv7vhBd-yr0wQztwvBeESerYuxJd5pK_18iXXAMEB7FoZ_0LDPekgdF0ZE9RirN-Z-SfntIqCDI54SIkw__v-mT8geQ6lIWJyoQ7JdL5b-KdhedT4gt-RMDsjO-Pjs0_kg7GAMgpDB83z85Q814jPC
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELemTWK8ICj_AgOMBOIBRasdx3GRENrYpo6tFUKbtDfPsR2GhNKuaUF942vwJfhQfBLunKQsQuJtr7Hb2Lk_vvPd_Y6QFx4h0fOcxz7LVSyKfj82ihUx584O-jZNncMC59FYDk_Fh7P0bI38amthMK2y1YlBUbuJxTvy7YRhL2wpuXg3vYyxaxRGV9sWGjVbHPnld3DZqreHe0Dfl5wf7J-8H8ZNV4HYwtk9B4cJWLZvitxKb5Rzkmc2U9YNrBlYlYP5bgqwIbLCmb5PnfeSM-lMljNhVMEQ6ABU_oZIwJVZJxu7--OPn1Zxi0wJ0ZbmKLld4S0PxklFjEWyWcw7x1_oEvDvWXDlMOwmal45-Q5uk1uNyUp3ah67Q9Z82SObe5hmhJ3ietj5uckS6ZEboyZYf5dcYm9uX3nq6qnV7x8_6Sx0sglo43S66nFSUVM6CpoY1RYFO5r60oHDXIab9q9LGvLhvaNz7-cXb6ihAYyzKZyCv6oWs29-eY-cXgst7pP1clL6h4S6hFuRmSxLZSHSlOcyKQyG1ZkrLEvSiLxuP7ye1kAeOjhASuqaTBrIpAOZNI_ILtJmNRNBuMODyeyzbmRaD6yUykt4q7BC-kHuwH92XCRKshwWG5FXSFmNqgLIZ01T8QALRtAtvQPWV8qBrZOIbHVmgojb7nDLG7pRMZX-KxAReb4axl9i2lzpJwucA7YHmsyw_Qc1K622lCAuEpMqIqrDZJ09d0fKLxcBgBwhmxDE-tH_1_WMbA5PRsf6-HB89Jjc5CgGjMdMbZH1-Wzhn4A5N8-fNjJEyfl1i-0fh5diLA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chinese+dentists%E2%80%99+restorative+preferences+and+choices+for+endodontically+treated+teeth%3A+a+representative+survey&rft.jtitle=BMC+oral+health&rft.au=Li%2C+Wenhui&rft.au=Zheng%2C+Ziting&rft.au=Zeng%2C+Yuting&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Zhiyan&rft.date=2024-12-18&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1472-6831&rft.volume=24&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12903-024-05217-2&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39696168&rft.externalDocID=PMC11658075
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6831&client=summon