Computerized cardiotocography analysis during labor – A state‐of‐the‐art review
Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine fetal wellbeing. The visual interpretation of the cardiotocography signals by the practitioners, following common guidelines, is subject to a hig...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica Vol. 102; no. 2; pp. 130 - 137 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.02.2023
John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine fetal wellbeing. The visual interpretation of the cardiotocography signals by the practitioners, following common guidelines, is subject to a high interobserver variability, and the efficiency of cardiotocography monitoring is still debated. Since the 1990s, researchers and practitioners work on designing reliable computer‐aided systems to assist practitioners in cardiotocography interpretation during labor. Several systems are integrated in the monitoring devices, mostly based on the guidelines, but they have not clearly demonstrated yet their usefulness. In the last decade, the availability of large clinical databases as well as the emergence of machine learning and deep learning methods in healthcare has led to a surge of studies applying those methods to cardiotocography signals analysis. The state‐of‐the‐art systems perform well to detect fetal hypoxia when evaluated on retrospective cohorts, but several challenges remain to be tackled before they can be used in clinical practice. First, the development and sharing of large, open and anonymized multicentric databases of perinatal and cardiotocography data during labor is required to build more accurate systems. Also, the systems must produce interpretable indicators along with the prediction of the risk of fetal hypoxia in order to be appropriated and trusted by practitioners. Finally, common standards should be built and agreed on to evaluate and compare those systems on retrospective cohorts and to validate their use in clinical practice.
The use of advanced computerized systems based on the latest machine learning techniques, trained on large databases of cardiotocography data, clinical factors and fetal outcomes, has the potential to successfully assist practitioners in the labor ward and to improve neonatal outcomes. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine fetal wellbeing. The visual interpretation of the cardiotocography signals by the practitioners, following common guidelines, is subject to a high interobserver variability, and the efficiency of cardiotocography monitoring is still debated. Since the 1990s, researchers and practitioners work on designing reliable computer‐aided systems to assist practitioners in cardiotocography interpretation during labor. Several systems are integrated in the monitoring devices, mostly based on the guidelines, but they have not clearly demonstrated yet their usefulness. In the last decade, the availability of large clinical databases as well as the emergence of machine learning and deep learning methods in healthcare has led to a surge of studies applying those methods to cardiotocography signals analysis. The state‐of‐the‐art systems perform well to detect fetal hypoxia when evaluated on retrospective cohorts, but several challenges remain to be tackled before they can be used in clinical practice. First, the development and sharing of large, open and anonymized multicentric databases of perinatal and cardiotocography data during labor is required to build more accurate systems. Also, the systems must produce interpretable indicators along with the prediction of the risk of fetal hypoxia in order to be appropriated and trusted by practitioners. Finally, common standards should be built and agreed on to evaluate and compare those systems on retrospective cohorts and to validate their use in clinical practice.
The use of advanced computerized systems based on the latest machine learning techniques, trained on large databases of cardiotocography data, clinical factors and fetal outcomes, has the potential to successfully assist practitioners in the labor ward and to improve neonatal outcomes. Abstract Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine fetal wellbeing. The visual interpretation of the cardiotocography signals by the practitioners, following common guidelines, is subject to a high interobserver variability, and the efficiency of cardiotocography monitoring is still debated. Since the 1990s, researchers and practitioners work on designing reliable computer‐aided systems to assist practitioners in cardiotocography interpretation during labor. Several systems are integrated in the monitoring devices, mostly based on the guidelines, but they have not clearly demonstrated yet their usefulness. In the last decade, the availability of large clinical databases as well as the emergence of machine learning and deep learning methods in healthcare has led to a surge of studies applying those methods to cardiotocography signals analysis. The state‐of‐the‐art systems perform well to detect fetal hypoxia when evaluated on retrospective cohorts, but several challenges remain to be tackled before they can be used in clinical practice. First, the development and sharing of large, open and anonymized multicentric databases of perinatal and cardiotocography data during labor is required to build more accurate systems. Also, the systems must produce interpretable indicators along with the prediction of the risk of fetal hypoxia in order to be appropriated and trusted by practitioners. Finally, common standards should be built and agreed on to evaluate and compare those systems on retrospective cohorts and to validate their use in clinical practice. Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine fetal wellbeing. The visual interpretation of the cardiotocography signals by the practitioners, following common guidelines, is subject to a high interobserver variability, and the efficiency of cardiotocography monitoring is still debated. Since the 1990s, researchers and practitioners work on designing reliable computer‐aided systems to assist practitioners in cardiotocography interpretation during labor. Several systems are integrated in the monitoring devices, mostly based on the guidelines, but they have not clearly demonstrated yet their usefulness. In the last decade, the availability of large clinical databases as well as the emergence of machine learning and deep learning methods in healthcare has led to a surge of studies applying those methods to cardiotocography signals analysis. The state‐of‐the‐art systems perform well to detect fetal hypoxia when evaluated on retrospective cohorts, but several challenges remain to be tackled before they can be used in clinical practice. First, the development and sharing of large, open and anonymized multicentric databases of perinatal and cardiotocography data during labor is required to build more accurate systems. Also, the systems must produce interpretable indicators along with the prediction of the risk of fetal hypoxia in order to be appropriated and trusted by practitioners. Finally, common standards should be built and agreed on to evaluate and compare those systems on retrospective cohorts and to validate their use in clinical practice. Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine fetal wellbeing. The visual interpretation of the cardiotocography signals by the practitioners, following common guidelines, is subject to a high interobserver variability, and the efficiency of cardiotocography monitoring is still debated. Since the 1990s, researchers and practitioners work on designing reliable computer-aided systems to assist practitioners in cardiotocography interpretation during labor. Several systems are integrated in the monitoring devices, mostly based on the guidelines, but they have not clearly demonstrated yet their usefulness. In the last decade, the availability of large clinical databases as well as the emergence of machine learning and deep learning methods in healthcare has led to a surge of studies applying those methods to cardiotocography signals analysis. The state-of-the-art systems perform well to detect fetal hypoxia when evaluated on retrospective cohorts, but several challenges remain to be tackled before they can be used in clinical practice. First, the development and sharing of large, open and anonymized multicentric databases of perinatal and cardiotocography data during labor is required to build more accurate systems. Also, the systems must produce interpretable indicators along with the prediction of the risk of fetal hypoxia in order to be appropriated and trusted by practitioners. Finally, common standards should be built and agreed on to evaluate and compare those systems on retrospective cohorts and to validate their use in clinical practice.Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine fetal wellbeing. The visual interpretation of the cardiotocography signals by the practitioners, following common guidelines, is subject to a high interobserver variability, and the efficiency of cardiotocography monitoring is still debated. Since the 1990s, researchers and practitioners work on designing reliable computer-aided systems to assist practitioners in cardiotocography interpretation during labor. Several systems are integrated in the monitoring devices, mostly based on the guidelines, but they have not clearly demonstrated yet their usefulness. In the last decade, the availability of large clinical databases as well as the emergence of machine learning and deep learning methods in healthcare has led to a surge of studies applying those methods to cardiotocography signals analysis. The state-of-the-art systems perform well to detect fetal hypoxia when evaluated on retrospective cohorts, but several challenges remain to be tackled before they can be used in clinical practice. First, the development and sharing of large, open and anonymized multicentric databases of perinatal and cardiotocography data during labor is required to build more accurate systems. Also, the systems must produce interpretable indicators along with the prediction of the risk of fetal hypoxia in order to be appropriated and trusted by practitioners. Finally, common standards should be built and agreed on to evaluate and compare those systems on retrospective cohorts and to validate their use in clinical practice. |
Author | Jauvion, Grégoire Ben M'Barek, Imane Ceccaldi, Pierre‐François |
AuthorAffiliation | 5 Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine Hôpital Foch Suresnes France 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris – Hôpital Beaujon Clichy La Garenne France 3 Health Simulation Department, iLumens Université Paris Cité Paris France 4 Genos Care Paris France 2 Université Paris Cité Paris France |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris – Hôpital Beaujon Clichy La Garenne France – name: 2 Université Paris Cité Paris France – name: 4 Genos Care Paris France – name: 5 Department of Gynecology‐Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine Hôpital Foch Suresnes France – name: 3 Health Simulation Department, iLumens Université Paris Cité Paris France |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Imane orcidid: 0000-0002-2495-0292 surname: Ben M'Barek fullname: Ben M'Barek, Imane email: imane.benmbarek@aphp.fr organization: Université Paris Cité – sequence: 2 givenname: Grégoire surname: Jauvion fullname: Jauvion, Grégoire organization: Genos Care – sequence: 3 givenname: Pierre‐François orcidid: 0000-0003-4716-9199 surname: Ceccaldi fullname: Ceccaldi, Pierre‐François organization: Hôpital Foch |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kt1qFDEUx4NU7LZ64wPIgDciTE0mHzO5EZZFa6HQCxUvw5kkM5tldrImMy3rVR9B8A37JGY6rdgi5iKfv_Pnn3POETrofW8ReknwCUnjHfg2nhDGZPUELYjAOMeMFAdogTEmuaBMHqKjGDfpVJSseoYOqeCMYCIW6NvKb3fjYIP7YU2mIRjnB699G2C33mfQQ7ePLmZmDK5vsw5qH7Kb61_ZMosDDPbm-qdv0jSspy2EIQv20tmr5-hpA120L-7WY_T144cvq0_5-cXp2Wp5nmtOWJU3uDGWi6KgBa4LbkDXNUBBQTSkpBgbziSzTNSSYWJKUxBgpOJAKefANKHH6GzWNR42ahfcFsJeeXDq9sKHViVTTndWCVxJa-skp3XKD61II8FQWdY1E7ysk9b7WWs31ltrtO2HAN0D0YcvvVur1l8qWVWSEpkE3twJBP99tHFQWxe17TrorR-jKkouRFlQgRP6-hG68WNI2Z6okqTP84ol6tXfjv5Yua9fAvAM6OBjDLZR2qWyOD8ZdJ0iWE0toqYWUbctkkLePgq5V_0nTGb4ynV2_x9SLS9OP88xvwENxNAM |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2025_101636 crossref_primary_10_17816_MAJ568979 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_18097 crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_9779831 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06322_4 crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2023_1190441 crossref_primary_10_3390_ai5020026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2024_109448 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2025_01_030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2024_04_022 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmedt_2024_1372358 |
Cites_doi | 10.3389/fmed.2021.661226 10.1007/s10877-020-00535-6 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04695.x 10.1038/s41598-021-92805-9 10.1109/ICoSP.2012.6491896 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30568-8 10.1111/aogs.12828 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318213e644 10.17219/acem/111812 10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.39 10.1503/cmaj.202538 10.1109/TETCI.2020.3020061 10.1186/s12884-020-2779-4 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.03.013 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90673-6 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100101 10.1088/2057-1976/aabc64 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.011 10.1515/JPM.2008.030 10.1111/aogs.13136 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103468 10.1186/s12938-017-0378-z 10.1016/0020-7101(90)90030-X 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.196 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.037 10.1111/aogs.13639 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000141 10.1007/s00404-019-05151-7 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02204.x 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103275 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.037 10.1186/1471-2393-14-16 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001799 10.3389/fped.2021.661400 10.1145/3233547.3233667 10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.47 10.1038/s41569-020-00503-2 10.3389/frai.2021.765210 10.3389/fped.2021.736834 10.3109/14767058.2016.1161750 10.1080/14767058.2018.1542676 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.017 10.1016/j.bspc.2011.06.008 10.1587/nolta.12.399 10.1002/1520-6661(200009/10)9:5<311::AID-MFM12>3.0.CO;2-9 10.1111/jep.12368 10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00079-4 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.02.009 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.033 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.04.004 10.3109/14767058.2016.1140740 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933368 10.1186/s12911-019-1007-5 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c51aeb 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004515 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). 2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). – notice: 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). – notice: 2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1111/aogs.14498 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Ben M'Barek et al |
EISSN | 1600-0412 |
EndPage | 137 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_6089eeb4e4cc412381f9ad397bb4657b PMC9889319 36541016 10_1111_aogs_14498 AOGS14498 |
Genre | reviewArticle Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 1OB 1OC 23M 24P 31~ 33P 34G 36B 39C 3O- 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 52M 52O 52T 52U 52V 52W 53G 5GY 5HH 5RE 5VS 702 7PT 7X7 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8FI 8FJ 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAKAS AANHP AAONW AAPXX AAYCA AAZKR ABCUV ABJNI ABPVW ABTOO ABUWG ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCMX ACGFS ACMXC ACPOU ACRPL ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADCVX ADEOM ADIYS ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADPDF ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFGKR AFKRA AFKVX AFPWT AFZJQ AHMBA AI. AIACR AIJEM AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJWEG ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BENPR BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DUUFO EBS EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F21 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FYUFA G-S GODZA H.X HF~ HMCUK HVGLF HZ~ IHE KBYEO L7B LATKE LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M44 MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM MY~ N04 N05 NF~ O66 OK1 OVD OVEED P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RPM RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TDBHL TEORI TFW UKHRP V9Y VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WVDHM WXSBR X7M YFH ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAFWJ AAYXX AGQPQ CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ AAMMB AEFGJ AFPKN AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. WIN 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5148-f0fde5622320b25dacbbaa23a6f17300d5494e46b9401d7d21a4185a3355a4c13 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:15 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:38:08 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:20:50 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 07:33:16 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:37:56 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:13:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:24 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:24:21 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | fetal heart rate monitoring perinatal morbidity cardiotocography deep learning fetal hypoxia cardiotocography machine learning computerized cardiotocography |
Language | English |
License | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5148-f0fde5622320b25dacbbaa23a6f17300d5494e46b9401d7d21a4185a3355a4c13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4716-9199 0000-0002-2495-0292 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/6089eeb4e4cc412381f9ad397bb4657b |
PMID | 36541016 |
PQID | 2771173584 |
PQPubID | 1136361 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6089eeb4e4cc412381f9ad397bb4657b pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9889319 proquest_miscellaneous_2756672360 proquest_journals_2771173584 pubmed_primary_36541016 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_aogs_14498 crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_14498 wiley_primary_10_1111_aogs_14498_AOGS14498 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | February 2023 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2023 text: February 2023 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Reykjavik – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 1991; 19 2021; 66 2020; 20 2019; 98 2000; 9 1981; 141 2008; 36 2016; 30 2019; 19 2009; 116 2021; 35 2017; 30 2020; 2 2011; 205 2018; 4 2010; 115 2015; 131 2010; 110 2021; 193 2014; 14 2011; 66 2019; 114 2017; 129 2021; 9 2022; 276 2021; 8 2019; 7 2022; 274 2021; 5 2021; 4 1974; 32 2017; 2017 2012 2010; 202 2019; 300 2016; 95 2016; 205 2012; 39 2020; 33 1998; 62 2019; 220 1982; 89 2017; 96 2018; 2018 2021; 12 1990; 25 2021; 11 2022; 4 2017; 16 2021; 18 2021; 138 2015; 21 2015; 2015 2018 2016 2016; 29 2012; 7 2022; 227 2004; 117 2017; 389 2020; 29 e_1_2_9_31_1 e_1_2_9_50_1 e_1_2_9_10_1 e_1_2_9_35_1 e_1_2_9_56_1 e_1_2_9_12_1 e_1_2_9_33_1 e_1_2_9_54_1 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (e_1_2_9_2_1) 1974; 32 e_1_2_9_14_1 e_1_2_9_39_1 e_1_2_9_16_1 e_1_2_9_37_1 e_1_2_9_58_1 e_1_2_9_18_1 e_1_2_9_41_1 e_1_2_9_64_1 e_1_2_9_20_1 e_1_2_9_62_1 e_1_2_9_22_1 e_1_2_9_45_1 e_1_2_9_24_1 e_1_2_9_43_1 e_1_2_9_8_1 e_1_2_9_6_1 e_1_2_9_60_1 Alfirevic Z (e_1_2_9_7_1) 2017; 2017 e_1_2_9_26_1 e_1_2_9_49_1 e_1_2_9_28_1 e_1_2_9_47_1 e_1_2_9_30_1 e_1_2_9_53_1 e_1_2_9_51_1 e_1_2_9_11_1 e_1_2_9_34_1 e_1_2_9_57_1 e_1_2_9_13_1 e_1_2_9_32_1 e_1_2_9_55_1 Petrozziello A (e_1_2_9_15_1) 2018; 2018 e_1_2_9_38_1 e_1_2_9_17_1 e_1_2_9_36_1 e_1_2_9_59_1 e_1_2_9_19_1 Blackwell SC (e_1_2_9_4_1) 2011; 205 e_1_2_9_42_1 Neilson JP (e_1_2_9_52_1) 2015; 2015 e_1_2_9_63_1 e_1_2_9_40_1 e_1_2_9_61_1 e_1_2_9_21_1 e_1_2_9_46_1 e_1_2_9_23_1 e_1_2_9_44_1 e_1_2_9_65_1 e_1_2_9_5_1 e_1_2_9_3_1 e_1_2_9_9_1 e_1_2_9_25_1 e_1_2_9_27_1 e_1_2_9_48_1 e_1_2_9_29_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 117 start-page: 174 year: 2004 end-page: 178 article-title: Comparison of fetal heart rate baseline estimation by SisPorto 2.01 and a consensus of clinicians publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol – volume: 29 start-page: 33 year: 2020 end-page: 44 article-title: Diagnostic equivalency of mobile CTG devices and remote analysis to conventional on‐site nonstress test publication-title: Adv Clin Exp Med – volume: 9 start-page: 736834 year: 2021 article-title: Detection of preventable fetal distress during labor from scanned Cardiotocogram tracings using deep learning publication-title: Front Pediatr – volume: 29 start-page: 3682 year: 2016 end-page: 3685 article-title: Should national guidelines continue to recommend fetal scalp blood sampling during labor? publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med – volume: 4 start-page: 765210 year: 2021 article-title: Challenges of developing robust AI for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring publication-title: Front Artif Intell – volume: 18 start-page: 465 year: 2021 end-page: 478 article-title: Artificial intelligence‐enhanced electrocardiography in cardiovascular disease management publication-title: Nat Rev Cardiol – start-page: 559 year: 2018 end-page: 560 – volume: 19 start-page: 39 year: 1991 end-page: 45 article-title: The advantages of computerized fetal heart rate analysis publication-title: J Perinat Med – volume: 96 start-page: 883 year: 2017 end-page: 891 article-title: Computerized data‐driven interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocogram: a cohort study publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand – volume: 8 start-page: 661226 year: 2021 article-title: Non‐linear methods predominant in fetal heart rate analysis: a systematic review publication-title: Front Med (Lausanne) – volume: 138 start-page: 366 year: 2021 end-page: 373 article-title: Relationship between umbilical cord gas values and neonatal outcomes: implications for electronic fetal heart rate monitoring publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 30 start-page: 62 year: 2017 end-page: 67 article-title: SisPorto 4.0 ‐ computer analysis following the 2015. FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med – volume: 2 start-page: 100101 year: 2020 article-title: Wireless, remote solution for home fetal and maternal heart rate monitoring publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM – volume: 36 start-page: 260 year: 2008 end-page: 264 article-title: Omniview‐SisPorto 3.5 ‐ a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis publication-title: J Perinat Med – volume: 39 start-page: 11846 year: 2012 end-page: 11860 article-title: Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate signals as the predictor of neonatal acidemia publication-title: Expert Systems Applications – volume: 33 start-page: 2284 year: 2020 end-page: 2290 article-title: Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med – volume: 141 start-page: 43 year: 1981 end-page: 52 article-title: Numerical analysis of the human fetal heart rate: the quality of ultrasound records publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – year: 2018 – volume: 66 start-page: 42 year: 2011 end-page: 46 article-title: Cerebrospinal fluid leakage, an uncommon complication of fetal blood sampling: a case report and review of the literature publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Surv – volume: 9 start-page: 311 year: 2000 end-page: 318 article-title: SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms publication-title: J Matern Fetal Med – volume: 114 start-page: 103468 year: 2019 article-title: Fetal heart rate baseline computation with a weighted median filter publication-title: Comput Biol Med – volume: 98 start-page: 1207 year: 2019 end-page: 1217 article-title: Computer‐based intrapartum fetal monitoring and beyond: a review of the 2nd workshop on signal processing and monitoring in labor (October 2017, Oxford, UK) publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand – volume: 7 start-page: 112026 year: 2019 end-page: 112036 article-title: Multimodal convolutional neural networks to detect fetal compromise during labor and delivery publication-title: IEEE Access – volume: 110 start-page: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 6 article-title: Twenty‐five years after the FIGO guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring: time for a simplified approach? publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet – volume: 25 start-page: 261 year: 1990 end-page: 272 article-title: Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate: 1 publication-title: Baseline Determination Int J Biomed Comput – volume: 202 start-page: 546.e1 year: 2010 end-page: 546.e7 article-title: Reduced prevalence of metabolic acidosis at birth: an analysis of established STAN usage in the total population of deliveries in a Swedish district hospital publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 95 start-page: 16 year: 2016 end-page: 27 article-title: ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized trials publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand – volume: 21 start-page: 694 year: 2015 end-page: 702 article-title: Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians publication-title: J Eval Clin Pract – volume: 2018 start-page: 5866 year: 2018 end-page: 5869 article-title: Deep learning for continuous electronic fetal monitoring in labor publication-title: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc – volume: 19 start-page: 286 year: 2019 article-title: DeepFHR: intelligent prediction of fetal Acidemia using fetal heart rate signals based on convolutional neural network publication-title: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak – start-page: 1645 year: 2012 end-page: 1649 – volume: 4 year: 2018 article-title: Sparse learning for intrapartum fetal heart rate analysis publication-title: Biomed Phys Eng Express – volume: 115 start-page: 419 year: 2010 end-page: 420 article-title: Perinatal hemorrhagic shock after fetal scalp blood sampling publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 30 start-page: 68 year: 2016 end-page: 78 article-title: Computer analysis of foetal monitoring signals publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol – volume: 389 start-page: 1719 year: 2017 end-page: 1729 article-title: Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet – volume: 300 start-page: 7 year: 2019 end-page: 14 article-title: Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the interpretation of intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings: a systematic review and meta‐analysis publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet – volume: 4 start-page: 130 year: 2022 end-page: 140 article-title: Computerized analysis of antepartum Cardiotocography: a review publication-title: Maternal‐Fetal Medicine – volume: 89 start-page: 270 year: 1982 end-page: 275 article-title: Baseline in human fetal heart‐rate records publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol – volume: 11 start-page: 13367 year: 2021 article-title: Deep neural network‐based classification of cardiotocograms outperformed conventional algorithms publication-title: Sci Rep – volume: 116 start-page: 1081 year: 2009 end-page: 1087 article-title: Inter‐observer agreement in clinical decision‐making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN publication-title: BJOG – volume: 66 start-page: 103275 year: 2021 article-title: Evaluation of artificial intelligence systems for assisting neurologists with fast and accurate annotations of scalp electroencephalography data publication-title: EBioMedicine – volume: 2015 start-page: CD000116 issue: 12 year: 2015 article-title: Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 227 start-page: 265.e1 year: 2022 end-page: 265.e8 article-title: The association of fetal acidemia with adverse neonatal outcomes at time of scheduled cesarean delivery publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 7 start-page: 350 year: 2012 end-page: 357 article-title: Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification publication-title: Biomedical Signal Processing and Control – volume: 5 start-page: 882 year: 2021 end-page: 892 article-title: Modelling segmented Cardiotocography time‐series signals using one‐dimensional convolutional neural networks for the early detection of abnormal birth outcomes publication-title: IEEE Trans Emerg Top Computational Intelligence – volume: 205 start-page: 91 year: 2016 end-page: 97 article-title: Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol – volume: 32 year: 1974 article-title: Fetal heart rate monitoring: guidelines publication-title: ACOG Tech Bull – volume: 131 start-page: 13 year: 2015 end-page: 24 article-title: FIGO intrapartum fetal monitoring expert consensus panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet – volume: 12 start-page: 399 year: 2021 end-page: 411 article-title: Predicting high risk birth from real large‐scale cardiotocographic data using multi‐input convolutional neural networks publication-title: Nonlinear Theory and its Applications, IEICE – year: 2016 – volume: 220 start-page: 269.e1 year: 2019 end-page: 269.e8 article-title: Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and ST signals is associated with significant reductions in hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy and cesarean delivery: an observational study in 38,466 deliveries publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 205 start-page: e1 issue: 378 year: 2011 end-page: e5 article-title: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3‐tier fetal heart rate interpretation system publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 19 start-page: 47 year: 1991 end-page: 51 article-title: System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis publication-title: J Perinat Med – volume: 9 start-page: 661400 year: 2021 article-title: Systematic review of intrapartum fetal heart rate spectral analysis and an application in the detection of fetal Acidemia publication-title: Front Pediatr – volume: 35 start-page: 771 year: 2021 end-page: 777 article-title: Fetal heart rate variability analysis for neonatal acidosis prediction publication-title: J Clin Monit Comput – volume: 20 start-page: 77 year: 2020 article-title: Home‐based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women's experiences publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth – volume: 16 start-page: 89 year: 2017 article-title: Classification of caesarean section and normal vaginal deliveries using foetal heart rate signals and advanced machine learning algorithms publication-title: Biomed Eng Online – volume: 62 start-page: 141 year: 1998 end-page: 147 article-title: Objective computerized fetal heart rate analysis publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet – volume: 193 start-page: E468 year: 2021 end-page: E477 article-title: Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis publication-title: CMAJ – volume: 274 start-page: 40 year: 2022 end-page: 47 article-title: Development of a comprehensive database for research on foetal acidosis publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol – volume: 129 start-page: 83 year: 2017 end-page: 90 article-title: Central fetal monitoring with and without computer analysis: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 276 start-page: 1 year: 2022 end-page: 8 article-title: Comparing apples and oranges? Variation in choice and reporting of short‐term perinatal outcomes of term labor: a systematic review of Cochrane reviews publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol – volume: 2017 year: 2017 article-title: Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 14 start-page: 16 year: 2014 article-title: Open access intrapartum CTG database publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth – ident: e_1_2_9_36_1 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.661226 – ident: e_1_2_9_32_1 doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00535-6 – ident: e_1_2_9_27_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04695.x – ident: e_1_2_9_41_1 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92805-9 – ident: e_1_2_9_29_1 doi: 10.1109/ICoSP.2012.6491896 – ident: e_1_2_9_45_1 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30568-8 – ident: e_1_2_9_17_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_51_1 doi: 10.1111/aogs.12828 – ident: e_1_2_9_62_1 doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318213e644 – ident: e_1_2_9_65_1 doi: 10.17219/acem/111812 – ident: e_1_2_9_20_1 doi: 10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.39 – ident: e_1_2_9_60_1 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202538 – ident: e_1_2_9_39_1 doi: 10.1109/TETCI.2020.3020061 – ident: e_1_2_9_64_1 doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2779-4 – ident: e_1_2_9_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.03.013 – ident: e_1_2_9_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020 – ident: e_1_2_9_31_1 doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90673-6 – ident: e_1_2_9_63_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100101 – ident: e_1_2_9_33_1 doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/aabc64 – ident: e_1_2_9_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.011 – ident: e_1_2_9_9_1 doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.030 – ident: e_1_2_9_24_1 doi: 10.1111/aogs.13136 – ident: e_1_2_9_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103468 – ident: e_1_2_9_40_1 doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0378-z – volume: 2018 start-page: 5866 year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_9_15_1 article-title: Deep learning for continuous electronic fetal monitoring in labor publication-title: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc – ident: e_1_2_9_30_1 doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(90)90030-X – ident: e_1_2_9_38_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.196 – ident: e_1_2_9_56_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.037 – ident: e_1_2_9_55_1 doi: 10.1111/aogs.13639 – ident: e_1_2_9_21_1 doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000141 – ident: e_1_2_9_48_1 doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05151-7 – ident: e_1_2_9_47_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023 – ident: e_1_2_9_6_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02204.x – ident: e_1_2_9_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103275 – ident: e_1_2_9_57_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.037 – ident: e_1_2_9_10_1 doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-16 – ident: e_1_2_9_46_1 doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001799 – ident: e_1_2_9_37_1 doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.661400 – volume: 205 start-page: e1 issue: 378 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_9_4_1 article-title: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3‐tier fetal heart rate interpretation system publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – ident: e_1_2_9_54_1 doi: 10.1145/3233547.3233667 – ident: e_1_2_9_19_1 doi: 10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.47 – ident: e_1_2_9_12_1 doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00503-2 – volume: 32 year: 1974 ident: e_1_2_9_2_1 article-title: Fetal heart rate monitoring: guidelines publication-title: ACOG Tech Bull – ident: e_1_2_9_16_1 doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.765210 – ident: e_1_2_9_42_1 doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.736834 – ident: e_1_2_9_25_1 doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1161750 – volume: 2015 start-page: CD000116 issue: 12 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_9_52_1 article-title: Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – ident: e_1_2_9_49_1 doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1542676 – volume: 2017 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_9_7_1 article-title: Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – ident: e_1_2_9_58_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.017 – ident: e_1_2_9_35_1 doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2011.06.008 – ident: e_1_2_9_14_1 doi: 10.1587/nolta.12.399 – ident: e_1_2_9_23_1 doi: 10.1002/1520-6661(200009/10)9:5<311::AID-MFM12>3.0.CO;2-9 – ident: e_1_2_9_5_1 doi: 10.1111/jep.12368 – ident: e_1_2_9_22_1 doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00079-4 – ident: e_1_2_9_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.02.009 – ident: e_1_2_9_50_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.033 – ident: e_1_2_9_11_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.04.004 – ident: e_1_2_9_59_1 doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1140740 – ident: e_1_2_9_34_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_43_1 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933368 – ident: e_1_2_9_44_1 doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1007-5 – ident: e_1_2_9_61_1 doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c51aeb – ident: e_1_2_9_53_1 doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004515 |
SSID | ssj0012748 |
Score | 2.4250162 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine... Abstract Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 130 |
SubjectTerms | Cardiology Cardiotocography - methods cardiotocography deep learning cardiotocography machine learning Childbirth & labor Clinical medicine computerized cardiotocography Female fetal heart rate monitoring fetal hypoxia Fetal Hypoxia - diagnosis Fetuses Heart rate Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology Humans Hypoxia Labor, Obstetric Machine learning Medical technology Muscle contraction Obstetrics perinatal morbidity Pregnancy Prenatal Care Retrospective Studies Review Uterus |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access dbid: 24P link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1da9YwFD7MCeLNcH5WN4nojUKhTfMmDXjzKm5DmAo63F1J0mQbSDv2vrvxaj9B8B_ul3hOmta9OAbehNKcQvPxtM_JyXkC8EoH65W0RS6U8VhYnRvL6zxobYxTFOqj5OT9T3LvQHw8nB2uwdsxF2bQh5gW3AgZ8XtNADd2cQXkpj9aUGhS17fgNuXWknI-F1-mGAL6W8N3GB1mWQmdxElpH8_fZ1d-R1G1_zqq-e-OyatMNv6Kdu7BRuKQbD4M-ias-e4-3NlPUfIH8H08quHkp2-ZiztOl71L4tTMJB0SNqQosjgP2OXFbzZnMb_o8uJXH7BAboglzi02JLg8hIOdD9_e7-XpAIXczWihMBSh9UhwkDUVls9a46w1hldGhpJ06lt0DoUX0mr0slrV8tKQlo2pkIQY4crqEax3feefAEOs-qq2BgkLFxV3dR3KMugaERxM62QGr8d-bFxSF6dDLn40o5dBfd7EPs_g5WR7OmhqXGv1joZjsiAd7HijPztqEqwaWdTae4uNcE6URD-CNi1yLGuFnCmbwdY4mE0C56LhSpXYfqReGbyYqhFWFCsxne_PyQZ5ruKVLDJ4PIz99CYVnZ2OVDkDtTIrVl51taY7OY7S3bpGfljqDN7E-XND85v5592v8erp_xg_g7scadiwr3wL1pdn534badPSPo_o-AP4hxem priority: 102 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
Title | Computerized cardiotocography analysis during labor – A state‐of‐the‐art review |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Faogs.14498 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541016 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2771173584 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2756672360 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9889319 https://doaj.org/article/6089eeb4e4cc412381f9ad397bb4657b |
Volume | 102 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwEB5BD4gLKv-BsjKCC0gRieO14-OCaCukAhJU9BbZjg2VqqSi20tPfQQk3rBPwoztrLpqBRcuVpT44IxnMt9kxt8AvNTBeiVtVQplPA5Wl8bytgxaG-MUpfrocPLeR7m7Lz4czA8utfqimrBED5wE90ZWrfbeCi-cEzU5mKBNj17UWiHnytLXF33eFEzl_AHGWukbjMGybITOxKRUw2PG7yeU0tTtmiuKjP3Xwcyr1ZKXUWx0Q9ubcCfjR7ZI674LN_xwD27t5Qz5ffg2tWk4PPM9c7HadDm6TEzNTOYgYel4Ios6wC7Of7MFi2eLLs5_jQEHxIU4onhYOtzyAPa33399t1vm5gmlm9NPwlCF3iO4QcRUWT7vjbPWGN4YGWriqO8xMEShSqsxwupVz2tDPDamQQBihKubh7AxjIN_DAzt1DetNQhWuGi4a9tQ4y60aL3B9E4W8GqSY-cyszg1uDjqpgiDZN5FmRfwYjX3OPFpXDvrLW3HagZxYMcbqBld1ozuX5pRwNa0mV02zJOOK1Xj-yPsKuD56jGaFOVJzODHU5qDGFfxRlYFPEp7v1pJQ33TESYXoNa0Ym2p60-Gwx-Rtlu3iA1rXcDrqD9_ef1u8WnnS7x68j8E8RRuc4RmqdZ8CzaWP0_9M4RSSzuDm1x8nkXbmcU_XX8AsYkg8Q |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Nb9QwEB1BkaAXxGcJFDCCC0iREsdrx8cFURboFiRa0VtkO3apVCWo3V449Scg8Q_7S5hxvKErKiQuVrSZleKPl7zxzDwDvNDBeiVtkQtlPDZW58byOg9aG-MUhfqoOHm-I2d74sP-ZD_l5lAtzKAPMW64ETLi-5oAThvSF1Bu-oMTik3q-ipcE5IrwiUXn8cgAjpcw4sYPWZZCZ3USSmR589_V75HUbb_Mq75d8rkRSobv0Vbt-BmIpFsOsz6bbjiuztwfZ7C5Hfh6_KshsMfvmUuppwuepfUqZlJQiRsqFFkcSGw87NfbMpigdH52c8-YIPkEFtcXGyocLkHe1tvd9_M8nSCQu4mtFMYitB6ZDhImwrLJ61x1hrDKyNDSUL1LXqHwgtpNbpZrWp5aUjMxlTIQoxwZXUf1rq-8w-AIVh9VVuDjIWLiru6DmUZdI0QDqZ1MoOXy3FsXJIXp1Mujpqlm0Fj3sQxz-D5aPt9ENW41Oo1TcdoQULY8Yf--KBJuGpkUWvvLXbCOVES_wjatEiyrBVyomwGm8vJbBI6TxquVIn9R-6VwbPxNuKKgiWm8_0p2SDRVbySRQYbw9yPT1LR4enIlTNQK6ti5VFX73SH36J2t66RIJY6g1dx_fyj-83007sv8erh_xg_hRuz3fl2s_1-5-MjWOfIyYYk801YWxyf-sfIoRb2SUTKbwEEGxI |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1La9VAFD7UCsWN1HfaqiO6UQjkMXcmA26urdf6aC1osbthnrUgSWlvN131Jwj-w_4Sz0wmsReL4GYIyQlkZs6XfCdnzjcAL4TXjjNd5JQrh40WudJVk3shlDI8pPpCcfLOLtvepx8OJgdL8Hqohen1IcYfbgEZ8X0dAH5s_RWQq-7wNKQmRXMDbsZsX9B1pntjDgHjrf49jAEzq6lI4qRhHc-fexc-R1G1_zqq-feKyatMNn6KZqtwO3FIMu0n_Q4sufYurOykLPk9-DZs1XB07iwxccXpvDNJnJqopENC-hJFEv2AXF78IlMS64suL352Hhvkhtiib5G-wOU-7M_eft3cztMGCrmZhB-FvvDWIcFB1lToamKV0VqpqlbMl0Gn3mJwSB1lWmCUZbmtShW0bFSNJERRU9YPYLntWvcICGLV1Y1WSFgqWlemaXxZetEggr2yhmXwchhHaZK6eNjk4occooww5jKOeQbPR9vjXlPjWqs3YTpGi6CDHU90J4cywUqyohHOaeyEMbQM9MMLZZFjaU3ZhOsMNobJlAmcp7LivMT-o8tk8Gy8jLAKuRLVuu4s2CDP5VXNigwe9nM_Pkkd9k5HqpwBX_CKhUddvNIefY_S3aJBfliKDF5F__lH9-X087sv8Wjtf4yfwsre1kx-er_7cR1uVcjI-iXmG7A8Pzlzj5FBzfWTCJTfSsoaRA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computerized+cardiotocography+analysis+during+labor+%E2%80%93+A+state%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90the%E2%80%90art+review&rft.jtitle=Acta+obstetricia+et+gynecologica+Scandinavica&rft.au=Ben+M%27Barek%2C+Imane&rft.au=Jauvion%2C+Gr%C3%A9goire&rft.au=Ceccaldi%2C+Pierre%E2%80%90Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+and+Sons+Inc&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Faogs.14498&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F36541016&rft.externalDocID=PMC9889319 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0001-6349&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0001-6349&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0001-6349&client=summon |