Explaining infant feeding: The role of previous personal and vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norms, self‐efficacy, and breastfeeding outcomes
Objectives Breastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed countries despite widespread promotion. This study examined the relationships between personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding, self‐ef...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of health psychology Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 763 - 785 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.11.2017
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1359-107X 2044-8287 2044-8287 |
DOI | 10.1111/bjhp.12254 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives
Breastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed countries despite widespread promotion. This study examined the relationships between personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding, self‐efficacy, the theory of planned behaviour variables of attitudes and subjective norm, and the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks post‐natally.
Design
A prospective questionnaire study of both first‐time mothers (n = 77) and experienced breastfeeders (n = 72) recruited at an antenatal clinic in South East England.
Methods
Participants completed a questionnaire at 32 weeks pregnant assessing personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding (breastfeeding, formula‐feeding, and maternal grandmother’s experience of breastfeeding), perceived control, self‐efficacy, intentions, attitudes (to breastfeeding and formula‐feeding), and subjective norm. Infant feeding behaviour was recorded at 6–8 weeks post‐natally. Multiple linear regression modelled the influence of vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norm, and self‐efficacy (but not perceived control) and modelled the influence of attitude, subjective norm, self‐efficacy, and past experience on intentions to breastfeed. Logistic regression modelled the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks.
Results
Previous experience (particularly personal experience of breastfeeding) explained a significant amount of variance in attitudes, subjective norm, and self‐efficacy. Intentions to breastfeed were predicted by subjective norm and attitude to formula‐feeding and, in experienced mothers, self‐efficacy. Breastfeeding at 6 weeks was predicted by intentions and vicarious experience of formula‐feeding.
Conclusion
Vicarious experience, particularly of formula‐feeding, has been shown to influence the behaviour of first‐time and experienced mothers both directly and indirectly via attitudes and subjective norm. Interventions that reduce exposure to formula‐feeding (perhaps by limiting advertising) or cushion mothers from its effects may enable more mothers to meet their breastfeeding goals.
Statement of contribution
What is already known on this subject?
Rates of breastfeeding in the United Kingdom are low and resistant to change.
Self‐efficacy may be an important and modifiable factor for breastfeeding initiation and maintenance.
What does this study add?
Self‐efficacy may only be a relevant factor among mothers who already have personal experience of breastfeeding.
Vicarious experience of formula‐feeding has been shown to be related to a lower rate of breastfeeding at 6 weeks. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objectives
Breastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed countries despite widespread promotion. This study examined the relationships between personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding, self‐efficacy, the theory of planned behaviour variables of attitudes and subjective norm, and the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks post‐natally.
Design
A prospective questionnaire study of both first‐time mothers (n = 77) and experienced breastfeeders (n = 72) recruited at an antenatal clinic in South East England.
Methods
Participants completed a questionnaire at 32 weeks pregnant assessing personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding (breastfeeding, formula‐feeding, and maternal grandmother’s experience of breastfeeding), perceived control, self‐efficacy, intentions, attitudes (to breastfeeding and formula‐feeding), and subjective norm. Infant feeding behaviour was recorded at 6–8 weeks post‐natally. Multiple linear regression modelled the influence of vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norm, and self‐efficacy (but not perceived control) and modelled the influence of attitude, subjective norm, self‐efficacy, and past experience on intentions to breastfeed. Logistic regression modelled the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks.
Results
Previous experience (particularly personal experience of breastfeeding) explained a significant amount of variance in attitudes, subjective norm, and self‐efficacy. Intentions to breastfeed were predicted by subjective norm and attitude to formula‐feeding and, in experienced mothers, self‐efficacy. Breastfeeding at 6 weeks was predicted by intentions and vicarious experience of formula‐feeding.
Conclusion
Vicarious experience, particularly of formula‐feeding, has been shown to influence the behaviour of first‐time and experienced mothers both directly and indirectly via attitudes and subjective norm. Interventions that reduce exposure to formula‐feeding (perhaps by limiting advertising) or cushion mothers from its effects may enable more mothers to meet their breastfeeding goals.
Statement of contribution
What is already known on this subject?
Rates of breastfeeding in the United Kingdom are low and resistant to change.
Self‐efficacy may be an important and modifiable factor for breastfeeding initiation and maintenance.
What does this study add?
Self‐efficacy may only be a relevant factor among mothers who already have personal experience of breastfeeding.
Vicarious experience of formula‐feeding has been shown to be related to a lower rate of breastfeeding at 6 weeks. Breastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed countries despite widespread promotion. This study examined the relationships between personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding, self-efficacy, the theory of planned behaviour variables of attitudes and subjective norm, and the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks post-natally.OBJECTIVESBreastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed countries despite widespread promotion. This study examined the relationships between personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding, self-efficacy, the theory of planned behaviour variables of attitudes and subjective norm, and the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks post-natally.A prospective questionnaire study of both first-time mothers (n = 77) and experienced breastfeeders (n = 72) recruited at an antenatal clinic in South East England.DESIGNA prospective questionnaire study of both first-time mothers (n = 77) and experienced breastfeeders (n = 72) recruited at an antenatal clinic in South East England.Participants completed a questionnaire at 32 weeks pregnant assessing personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding (breastfeeding, formula-feeding, and maternal grandmother's experience of breastfeeding), perceived control, self-efficacy, intentions, attitudes (to breastfeeding and formula-feeding), and subjective norm. Infant feeding behaviour was recorded at 6-8 weeks post-natally. Multiple linear regression modelled the influence of vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norm, and self-efficacy (but not perceived control) and modelled the influence of attitude, subjective norm, self-efficacy, and past experience on intentions to breastfeed. Logistic regression modelled the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks.METHODSParticipants completed a questionnaire at 32 weeks pregnant assessing personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding (breastfeeding, formula-feeding, and maternal grandmother's experience of breastfeeding), perceived control, self-efficacy, intentions, attitudes (to breastfeeding and formula-feeding), and subjective norm. Infant feeding behaviour was recorded at 6-8 weeks post-natally. Multiple linear regression modelled the influence of vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norm, and self-efficacy (but not perceived control) and modelled the influence of attitude, subjective norm, self-efficacy, and past experience on intentions to breastfeed. Logistic regression modelled the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks.Previous experience (particularly personal experience of breastfeeding) explained a significant amount of variance in attitudes, subjective norm, and self-efficacy. Intentions to breastfeed were predicted by subjective norm and attitude to formula-feeding and, in experienced mothers, self-efficacy. Breastfeeding at 6 weeks was predicted by intentions and vicarious experience of formula-feeding.RESULTSPrevious experience (particularly personal experience of breastfeeding) explained a significant amount of variance in attitudes, subjective norm, and self-efficacy. Intentions to breastfeed were predicted by subjective norm and attitude to formula-feeding and, in experienced mothers, self-efficacy. Breastfeeding at 6 weeks was predicted by intentions and vicarious experience of formula-feeding.Vicarious experience, particularly of formula-feeding, has been shown to influence the behaviour of first-time and experienced mothers both directly and indirectly via attitudes and subjective norm. Interventions that reduce exposure to formula-feeding (perhaps by limiting advertising) or cushion mothers from its effects may enable more mothers to meet their breastfeeding goals. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Rates of breastfeeding in the United Kingdom are low and resistant to change. Self-efficacy may be an important and modifiable factor for breastfeeding initiation and maintenance. What does this study add? Self-efficacy may only be a relevant factor among mothers who already have personal experience of breastfeeding. Vicarious experience of formula-feeding has been shown to be related to a lower rate of breastfeeding at 6 weeks.CONCLUSIONVicarious experience, particularly of formula-feeding, has been shown to influence the behaviour of first-time and experienced mothers both directly and indirectly via attitudes and subjective norm. Interventions that reduce exposure to formula-feeding (perhaps by limiting advertising) or cushion mothers from its effects may enable more mothers to meet their breastfeeding goals. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Rates of breastfeeding in the United Kingdom are low and resistant to change. Self-efficacy may be an important and modifiable factor for breastfeeding initiation and maintenance. What does this study add? Self-efficacy may only be a relevant factor among mothers who already have personal experience of breastfeeding. Vicarious experience of formula-feeding has been shown to be related to a lower rate of breastfeeding at 6 weeks. ObjectivesBreastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed countries despite widespread promotion. This study examined the relationships between personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding, self‐efficacy, the theory of planned behaviour variables of attitudes and subjective norm, and the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks post‐natally.DesignA prospective questionnaire study of both first‐time mothers (n = 77) and experienced breastfeeders (n = 72) recruited at an antenatal clinic in South East England.MethodsParticipants completed a questionnaire at 32 weeks pregnant assessing personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding (breastfeeding, formula‐feeding, and maternal grandmother’s experience of breastfeeding), perceived control, self‐efficacy, intentions, attitudes (to breastfeeding and formula‐feeding), and subjective norm. Infant feeding behaviour was recorded at 6–8 weeks post‐natally. Multiple linear regression modelled the influence of vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norm, and self‐efficacy (but not perceived control) and modelled the influence of attitude, subjective norm, self‐efficacy, and past experience on intentions to breastfeed. Logistic regression modelled the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks.ResultsPrevious experience (particularly personal experience of breastfeeding) explained a significant amount of variance in attitudes, subjective norm, and self‐efficacy. Intentions to breastfeed were predicted by subjective norm and attitude to formula‐feeding and, in experienced mothers, self‐efficacy. Breastfeeding at 6 weeks was predicted by intentions and vicarious experience of formula‐feeding.ConclusionVicarious experience, particularly of formula‐feeding, has been shown to influence the behaviour of first‐time and experienced mothers both directly and indirectly via attitudes and subjective norm. Interventions that reduce exposure to formula‐feeding (perhaps by limiting advertising) or cushion mothers from its effects may enable more mothers to meet their breastfeeding goals.Statement of contributionWhat is already known on this subject?Rates of breastfeeding in the United Kingdom are low and resistant to change.Self‐efficacy may be an important and modifiable factor for breastfeeding initiation and maintenance.What does this study add?Self‐efficacy may only be a relevant factor among mothers who already have personal experience of breastfeeding.Vicarious experience of formula‐feeding has been shown to be related to a lower rate of breastfeeding at 6 weeks. Breastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed countries despite widespread promotion. This study examined the relationships between personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding, self-efficacy, the theory of planned behaviour variables of attitudes and subjective norm, and the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks post-natally. A prospective questionnaire study of both first-time mothers (n = 77) and experienced breastfeeders (n = 72) recruited at an antenatal clinic in South East England. Participants completed a questionnaire at 32 weeks pregnant assessing personal and vicarious experience of infant feeding (breastfeeding, formula-feeding, and maternal grandmother's experience of breastfeeding), perceived control, self-efficacy, intentions, attitudes (to breastfeeding and formula-feeding), and subjective norm. Infant feeding behaviour was recorded at 6-8 weeks post-natally. Multiple linear regression modelled the influence of vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norm, and self-efficacy (but not perceived control) and modelled the influence of attitude, subjective norm, self-efficacy, and past experience on intentions to breastfeed. Logistic regression modelled the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks. Previous experience (particularly personal experience of breastfeeding) explained a significant amount of variance in attitudes, subjective norm, and self-efficacy. Intentions to breastfeed were predicted by subjective norm and attitude to formula-feeding and, in experienced mothers, self-efficacy. Breastfeeding at 6 weeks was predicted by intentions and vicarious experience of formula-feeding. Vicarious experience, particularly of formula-feeding, has been shown to influence the behaviour of first-time and experienced mothers both directly and indirectly via attitudes and subjective norm. Interventions that reduce exposure to formula-feeding (perhaps by limiting advertising) or cushion mothers from its effects may enable more mothers to meet their breastfeeding goals. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Rates of breastfeeding in the United Kingdom are low and resistant to change. Self-efficacy may be an important and modifiable factor for breastfeeding initiation and maintenance. What does this study add? Self-efficacy may only be a relevant factor among mothers who already have personal experience of breastfeeding. Vicarious experience of formula-feeding has been shown to be related to a lower rate of breastfeeding at 6 weeks. |
Author | Bartle, Naomi C. Harvey, Kate |
AuthorAffiliation | 2 School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences University of Reading UK 1 Centre for Technology Enabled Health Research Coventry University UK |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences University of Reading UK – name: 1 Centre for Technology Enabled Health Research Coventry University UK |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Naomi C. surname: Bartle fullname: Bartle, Naomi C. email: naomi.bartle@coventry.ac.uk organization: Coventry University – sequence: 2 givenname: Kate surname: Harvey fullname: Harvey, Kate organization: University of Reading |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9UsFuEzEQtVARTQMXPgBZ4oJQU-xde73LAQmqQkGV4FAkbpbXGTeONvbW9obmxifwA_wcX4I3CRVUCPtgeea955nnOUIHzjtA6DElJzSvF-1y0Z_QouDsHpoUhLFZXdTiAE1oyZsZJeLLITqKcUkILUvCH6DDoq5YxUsxQT_ObvpOWWfdFbbOKJewAZjn60t8uQAcfAfYG9wHWFs_RNxDiN6pDis3x2urVdiG4SYnLDid0Q6rlGwa5hCPcRzaJehk14CdD6sxAp35-e07GJPZenO8VWoDqJj2T2M_JO1XEB-i-0Z1ER7tzyn6_Pbs8vR8dvHx3fvT1xczzenYrgCuBQNVtco0talLqhgx464JE7ogSpC5qhTTFZSqbCrFTVtqTQUhlWDlFL3a6fZDu4K5BpeC6mQf7EqFjfTKyr8zzi7klV9LXnEuKM0Cz_YCwV8PEJNc2aih65SDbI-kTba-4aPpU_T0DnTph5AdjbKgBWOipk2dUU_-rOi2lN8_lwHPdwAdfIwBzC2EEjmOhRzHQm7HIoPJHbC2SSXrx25s928K3VG-2g42_xGXbz6cf9pxfgERMc8q |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1017_S1468109921000335 crossref_primary_10_3917_dev_241_0030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2019_104316 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12966_024_01641_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_08870446_2021_2025374 crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2020_1847438 crossref_primary_10_1097_JXX_0000000000000521 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjom_2022_30_1_20 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13006_025_00709_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2024_104019 crossref_primary_10_1111_birt_12549 crossref_primary_10_1145_3571823_3571828 crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2019_1584739 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2019_102532 crossref_primary_10_1111_scs_12870 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare9030276 crossref_primary_10_1177_1367493518788466 crossref_primary_10_14423_SMJ_0000000000001238 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2017_12_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12232347 crossref_primary_10_2147_COPD_S338720 crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2023_2297120 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wombi_2018_09_003 crossref_primary_10_29252_ijn_32_119_59 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2022_103579 crossref_primary_10_1061_JTEPBS_0000647 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2021_103072 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogn_2020_10_007 crossref_primary_10_1111_mcn_13147 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sleh_2021_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1111_mcn_13424 crossref_primary_10_1080_03004430_2023_2257003 crossref_primary_10_1080_10810730_2020_1821131 crossref_primary_10_1590_s1980_220x2017031803329 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare10081432 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsoc_2022_904773 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17228497 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu10010048 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cegh_2024_101744 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2018_05_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedn_2020_04_022 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_797482 crossref_primary_10_1080_01062301_2024_2362452 crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2022_826295 crossref_primary_10_1111_mcn_12903 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjhp_12498 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13006_025_00701_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedhc_2022_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1080_17437199_2019_1630293 crossref_primary_10_1002_fsn3_3535 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2018_11_008 crossref_primary_10_1177_0890334418799047 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0279691 crossref_primary_10_4274_MNM_2023_23173 crossref_primary_10_1080_17437199_2021_1893783 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2024_107397 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu16070988 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41430_021_01031_z crossref_primary_10_3390_children10020338 crossref_primary_10_14423_SMJ_0000000000001694 crossref_primary_10_3889_oamjms_2021_6655 crossref_primary_10_1089_bfm_2020_0165 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41043_021_00245_y crossref_primary_10_4103_jehp_jehp_1257_22 crossref_primary_10_1108_JHOM_02_2024_0074 crossref_primary_10_2174_1573404817666211124102128 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_03431_8 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0285436 crossref_primary_10_1080_02650487_2020_1780060 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2018_12_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedn_2019_12_017 crossref_primary_10_1093_nutrit_nuaa016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2022_103314 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2021_103093 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2 10.1136/bmj.a3026 10.1080/17437199.2013.869710 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01020.x 10.1177/1090198107303362 10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.657 10.1016/0020-7489(95)00065-8 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00633.x 10.1177/0890334413492908 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.015 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00202.x 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02083.x 10.1007/s10995-013-1265-2 10.1177/0884217503258459 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03390.x 10.12968/bjom.2008.16.3.28688 10.1186/1471-2393-14-50 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199910)22:5<399::AID-NUR6>3.0.CO;2-4 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01210.x 10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00222.x 10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.424 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2006.00054.x 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2003.00446.x 10.1002/nur.20368 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.30 10.1080/08870440701615260 10.4324/9781315800820 10.1348/135910708x336112 10.1097/00006199-199811000-00006 10.1007/s10995-014-1591-z |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society 2017 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. 2017 The British Psychological Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society – notice: 2017 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. – notice: 2017 The British Psychological Society |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ 7U3 BHHNA K9. NAPCQ 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1111/bjhp.12254 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) Social Services Abstracts Sociological Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Social Services Abstracts Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) Sociological Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Psychology |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Naomi C. Bartle and Kate Harvey |
EISSN | 2044-8287 |
EndPage | 785 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5655711 28646537 10_1111_bjhp_12254 BJHP12254 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United Kingdom--UK |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom--UK |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ESRC |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 07C 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 23N 24P 2QV 31~ 33P 36B 4.4 50Y 50Z 52M 52O 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 53G 5GY 6J9 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8R4 8R5 930 A01 A04 AABNI AAESR AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCUV ABDBF ABIVO ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABSOO ABXGK ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACGOF ACHQT ACMXC ACPOU ACRPL ACUHS ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-C D-D DCZOG DPXWK DRFUL DRMAN DRSSH DXH EAD EAP EAS EBD EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EPS ESX F00 F01 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N G50 GNK GNM GODZA HAOEW HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSSH MSFUL MSMAN MSSSH MXFUL MXMAN MXSSH MY~ N04 N06 NF~ NIF O66 O9- OMB OMI OVD P2P P2W P2Y P2Z P4B P4C PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q2X QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHDPE WIH WII WIJ WOHZO WSUWO WXSBR XG1 ZZTAW ~IA ~WP AAHHS AAYXX ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AIWBW AJBDE CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ 7U3 BHHNA K9. NAPCQ 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5144-87e5c74ea6baf98f831a40f0f0f8047c20a70da6a4c6e3a396a5fb3cc17006743 |
IEDL.DBID | 24P |
ISSN | 1359-107X 2044-8287 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:31:17 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:02:32 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 00:04:13 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:05:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:22:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:40 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 20 07:24:44 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | infant feeding SCT TPB past experience self-efficacy vicarious experience breastfeeding |
Language | English |
License | Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2017 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5144-87e5c74ea6baf98f831a40f0f0f8047c20a70da6a4c6e3a396a5fb3cc17006743 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fbjhp.12254 |
PMID | 28646537 |
PQID | 2124478198 |
PQPubID | 33660 |
PageCount | 23 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5655711 proquest_miscellaneous_1913395465 proquest_journals_2124478198 pubmed_primary_28646537 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjhp_12254 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_bjhp_12254 wiley_primary_10_1111_bjhp_12254_BJHP12254 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | November 2017 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2017 text: November 2017 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Leicester – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | British journal of health psychology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Br J Health Psychol |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc |
References | 2013; 29 2010; 33 2012 2010 1991; 50 2002; 32 2008; 16 1984; 23 2011; 40 1977; 84 2016; 387 1999; 22 2006 2003; 16 2005 2012; 17 2006; 2 2002 2009; 338 2003; 32 1998; 47 1996; 33 1979; 27 2007; 29 2013; 18 2009; 14 2009; 36 2002; 29 1986 2014; 14 2008; 23 2014; 19 2014 2005; 50 2007; 65 2014; 8 2010; 7 1983; 44 2003; 22 1999; 318 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 Conner M. (e_1_2_7_15_1) 2005 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 Ajzen I. (e_1_2_7_5_1) 2005 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 Fishbein M. (e_1_2_7_19_1) 1979; 27 e_1_2_7_38_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 Bandura A. (e_1_2_7_10_1) 1986 |
References_xml | – volume: 50 start-page: 272 issue: 3 year: 2005 end-page: 282 article-title: Initiation and continuation of breastfeeding: Theory of planned behaviour publication-title: Journal of Advanced Nursing – volume: 84 start-page: 191 issue: 2 year: 1977 end-page: 215 article-title: Self‐efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change publication-title: Psychological Review – volume: 18 start-page: 296 issue: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 306 article-title: Effectiveness of a breastfeeding self‐efficacy intervention: Do hospital practices make a difference? publication-title: Maternal and Child Health Journal – year: 2005 – volume: 22 start-page: 424 issue: 4 year: 2003 end-page: 428 article-title: Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual analysis publication-title: Health Psychology – volume: 50 start-page: 179 issue: 2 year: 1991 end-page: 211 article-title: The theory of planned behavior publication-title: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes – volume: 29 start-page: 579 issue: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 585 article-title: Association between length of exclusive breastfeeding and subsequent breastfeeding continuation publication-title: Journal of Human Lactation – volume: 14 start-page: 379 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 403 article-title: Using an extended theory of planned behaviour to inform interventions aimed at increasing breastfeeding uptake in primiparas experiencing material deprivation publication-title: British Journal of Health Psychology – volume: 44 start-page: 657 issue: 4 year: 1983 end-page: 671 article-title: Predicting and understanding mothers’ infant‐feeding intentions and behavior: Testing the theory of reasoned action publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – volume: 23 start-page: 223 issue: 3 year: 1984 end-page: 231 article-title: Predicting mothers’ choice of infant feeding method publication-title: British Journal of Social Psychology – start-page: 170 year: 2005 end-page: 222 – volume: 23 start-page: 767 issue: 7 year: 2008 end-page: 788 article-title: Predicting breastfeeding in women living in areas of economic hardship: Explanatory role of the theory of planned behaviour publication-title: Psychology & Health – volume: 387 start-page: 475 year: 2016 end-page: 490 article-title: Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect publication-title: The Lancet – volume: 19 start-page: 897 issue: 4 year: 2014 end-page: 907 article-title: New evidence on breastfeeding and postpartum depression: The importance of understanding women's intentions publication-title: Maternal and Child Health Journal – volume: 27 start-page: 65 year: 1979 end-page: 116 article-title: A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications publication-title: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation – volume: 40 start-page: 35 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 46 article-title: A pilot randomized controlled trial of a breastfeeding self‐efficacy intervention with primiparous mothers publication-title: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing – year: 2014 – year: 2010 – volume: 17 start-page: 854 issue: 4 year: 2012 end-page: 871 article-title: Employing an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict breastfeeding intention, initiation, and maintenance in White British and South‐Asian mothers living in Bradford publication-title: British Journal of Health Psychology – year: 2012 – volume: 2 start-page: 156 issue: 3 year: 2006 end-page: 168 article-title: Exploring women's views of breastfeeding: A focus group study within an area with high levels of socio‐economic deprivation publication-title: Maternal and Child Nutrition – year: 1986 – volume: 32 start-page: 734 issue: 6 year: 2003 end-page: 744 article-title: The breastfeeding self‐efficacy scale: Psychometric assessment of the short form publication-title: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing – volume: 33 start-page: 111 issue: 2 year: 2010 end-page: 119 article-title: Psychometric testing of the breastfeeding self‐efficacy scale‐short form in a sample of Black women in the United States publication-title: Research in Nursing & Health – volume: 318 start-page: 30 year: 1999 end-page: 34 article-title: Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London publication-title: British Medical Journal – volume: 22 start-page: 399 issue: 5 year: 1999 end-page: 409 article-title: Development and psychometric testing of the Breastfeeding Self‐Efficacy Scale publication-title: Research in Nursing & Health – volume: 33 start-page: 338 issue: 3 year: 1996 end-page: 348 article-title: A comparison of two methods of measuring fatigue in patients on chronic haemodialysis: Visual analogue vs Likert scale publication-title: International Journal of Nursing Studies – volume: 14 start-page: 50 year: 2014 article-title: What factors explain pregnant women's feeding intentions in Bradford, England: A multi‐methods, multi‐ethnic study publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth – year: 2002 – volume: 16 start-page: 172 issue: 3 year: 2008 end-page: 178 article-title: Duration of breastfeeding in young women: Psychological influences publication-title: British Journal of Midwifery – volume: 16 start-page: 265 issue: 4 year: 2003 end-page: 273 article-title: What is the problem with breast‐feeding? A qualitative analysis of infant feeding perceptions publication-title: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics – year: 2006 – volume: 338 start-page: a3026 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: a3026 article-title: Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial publication-title: British Medical Journal – volume: 65 start-page: 2147 issue: 10 year: 2007 end-page: 2159 article-title: Being a ‘good mother’: Managing breastfeeding and merging identities publication-title: Social Science & Medicine – volume: 47 start-page: 325 issue: 6 year: 1998 end-page: 336 article-title: A theory of planned behavior‐based structural model for breast‐feeding publication-title: Nursing Research – volume: 36 start-page: 250 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 258 article-title: The impact of a self‐efficacy intervention on short‐term breast‐feeding outcomes publication-title: Health Education & Behavior – volume: 8 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 7 article-title: Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour publication-title: Health Psychology Review – volume: 29 start-page: 1075 issue: 7 year: 2007 end-page: 1090 article-title: Health, morality, and infant feeding: British mothers’ experiences of formula milk use in the early weeks publication-title: Sociology of Health & Illness – volume: 32 start-page: 665 issue: 4 year: 2002 end-page: 683 article-title: Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior1 publication-title: Journal of Applied Social Pyschology – volume: 29 start-page: 278 issue: 4 year: 2002 end-page: 284 article-title: Effect of maternal confidence on breastfeeding duration: An application of breastfeeding self‐efficacy theory publication-title: Birth – volume: 387 start-page: 491 year: 2016 end-page: 504 article-title: Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? publication-title: The Lancet – volume: 7 start-page: 48 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 60 article-title: Infant feeding choices: Experience, self‐identity and lifestyle publication-title: Maternal & Child Nutrition – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3026 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.1080/17437199.2013.869710 – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 – volume-title: The influence of attitudes on behaviour handbook of attitudes and attitude change: Basic principles year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01020.x – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1177/1090198107303362 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.657 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(95)00065-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00633.x – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1177/0890334413492908 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.015 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00202.x – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02083.x – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1265-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1177/0884217503258459 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03390.x – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.12968/bjom.2008.16.3.28688 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-50 – volume-title: Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory year: 1986 ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199910)22:5<399::AID-NUR6>3.0.CO;2-4 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01210.x – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00222.x – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 – start-page: 170 volume-title: Predicting health behaviour year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.424 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2006.00054.x – volume: 27 start-page: 65 year: 1979 ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 article-title: A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications publication-title: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2003.00446.x – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1002/nur.20368 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.30 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1080/08870440701615260 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.4324/9781315800820 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1348/135910708x336112 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1097/00006199-199811000-00006 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1591-z |
SSID | ssj0013305 |
Score | 2.4466023 |
Snippet | Objectives
Breastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed... Breastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed countries... ObjectivesBreastfeeding confers important health benefits to both infants and their mothers, but rates are low in the United Kingdom and other developed... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 763 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Advertising Attitude Attitudes Baby foods Breast Feeding breastfeeding Breastfeeding & lactation Developed countries Efficacy England Feeding Behavior Female Health promotion Humans Infant infant feeding Infants Intention Locus of control Maternal and infant welfare Mothers Norms Original past experience Perceived control Personal experiences Pregnancy Prenatal care Prospective Studies Questionnaires Research design SCT Self Efficacy Surveys and Questionnaires Theory of planned behavior TPB vicarious experience |
Title | Explaining infant feeding: The role of previous personal and vicarious experience on attitudes, subjective norms, self‐efficacy, and breastfeeding outcomes |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fbjhp.12254 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646537 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2124478198 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1913395465 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5655711 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NatwwEB7SBEouoU1_4jQNCu2lJS62JVt26SXbZlkCLTk0sDcjyRJJCN4l9h5yyyPkBfpyfZLOyF4nS0qh-GJs2TKaH31jjb4BeB_lwqXSENGt0iGVuAqLKLdhYqQpDK9Q5J7t80c2ORMn03S6Bl-We2E6fojhhxtZhvfXZOBKNw-MXF-ezz_FqI7iCWzQ3lpizk_E6f0aAvcJjDFPC3Q2ctqTk1Iez_2zq9PRI4z5OFXyIYT1c9D4GWz14JEdddJ-Dmu23oan3_vl8W3YHNzZzQv4Rel1Xf0HhmqEI8hcN1V9ZqgcjPIK2cyxOSX6YvzP5j0uZ6quGDoQjKLpsh3IkNmsZqql3ILKNoesWejLzl2yGpEvXbFX7vftnSVaCmVuDv2bNKW9t33XbLZocaBt8xLOxsc_v07CvhhDaBBTCfSaNjVSWJVp5Yrc5TxWInJ05JGQJomUjCqVKWEyyxUvMpU6zY0hAkDa6fAK1utZbXeAGau0MalEZ6BEYXIEeYiaU2eqwgkMmQP4sJRJaXqmciqYcVUuIxaSX-nlF8C7oe284-f4a6u9pWjL3kabMiFoIxERYYcHw220LloyUbXFIS4xmuW8oILxAbzuNGHoJskzIqeTAcgVHRkaEHP36p364twzeCOKTmUcB_DRa9M_vrwcnUxO_dnu_zR-A5sJ4Q-_aXIP1tvrhX2L6KnV-95I9mHjaPRtNP4DY2cb5g |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3LbtQwFL2CIkE3VSmvlBaMYANqqiR24qS7gqiG0lZdtNLsIsexVaoqGZHMojs-gR_g5_gS7nU8aUdFSGg2o8QzjnwfPo6PzwV4F-XCplKT0K2qQipxFRZRbsJES11oXqPJndrnSTY5F4fTdOq5OXQWZtCHGF-4UWS4fE0BTi-kb0V5dXkx243RH8V9eCCyRFJcJuL0ZhOBOwZjzNMCs42cenVSIvLc_HZ5ProDMu9yJW9jWDcJHazDmkePbH8w92O4Z5oNeHjs98c3YHXMZ9dP4Bfx64YCEAz9CIeQ2WGu2mPoHYyIhay1bEZM33besZkH5kw1NcMMgstoumxGNWTWNkz1RC6oTbfDunl1OeRL1iD0pSvmyv7-8dOQLoXS1zvunyrivfe-a9bOexxp0z2F84PPZ58moa_GEGoEVQLTpkm1FEZllbJFbnMeKxFZ-uSRkDqJlIxqlSmhM8MVLzKV2oprTQqAdNThGaw0bWNeANNGVVqnErOBEoXOEeUhbE6trgsrcM0cwPuFTUrtpcqpYsZVuViykP1KZ78A3o5tZ4NAx19bbS1MW_og7cqEsI1ESIQdvhlvY3jRnolqDA5xictZzguqGB_A88ETxm6SPCN1OhmAXPKRsQFJdy_fab5dOAlvhNGpjOMAPjhv-seTlx8PJ6fu2-b_NH4NjyZnx0fl0ZeTry9hNSEw4k5QbsFK_31uthFK9dUrFzB_ALdZHeA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NTtwwEB5RKiEuVUt_SKHUFb20IiiJnTipeuGnqy20aA9F2lvkOLYAoWzEZg_c-gh9gb4cT8KMkw2sqCqhXKLEiSPPj7-Jx98AfAxSYWOpiehWFT6VuPKzIDV-pKXONC9R5I7t8yQZnoqjcTxegq_zvTAtP0T_w40sw_lrMvC6tPeMvLg4q3dDVEfxBJ661T7idRajuzUE7hIYQx5n6GzkuCMnpTyeu2cXp6MHGPNhquR9COvmoMFzeNaBR7bXSvsFLJlqDVZ-dsvja7Dau7Prl_CX0uva-g8M1QhHkNl2qvrCUDkY5RWyiWU1Jfpi_M_qDpczVZUMHQhG0XTZ9GTIbFIx1VBuQWmmO2w6Ky5ad8kqRL50xVzam99_DNFSKH29495UUNp703XNJrMGB9pMX8Hp4Nuvg6HfFWPwNWIqgV7TxFoKo5JC2Sy1KQ-VCCwdaSCkjgIlg1IlSujEcMWzRMW24FoTASDtdHgNy9WkMuvAtFGF1rFEZ6BEplMEeYiaY6vLzAoMmT34NJdJrjumciqYcZnPIxaSX-7k58F237Zu-Tn-2WpzLtq8s9FpHhG0kYiIsMMP_W20LloyUZXBIc4xmuU8o4LxHrxpNaHvJkoTIqeTHsgFHekbEHP34p3q_MwxeCOKjmUYevDZadN_vjzfPxqO3NnbxzR-Dyujw0H-4_vJ8QasRgRF3P7JTVhurmbmHQKppthy9nIL_CQdEg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining+infant+feeding%3A+The+role+of+previous+personal+and+vicarious+experience+on+attitudes%2C+subjective+norms%2C+self-efficacy%2C+and+breastfeeding+outcomes&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+health+psychology&rft.au=Bartle%2C+Naomi+C&rft.au=Harvey%2C+Kate&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.eissn=2044-8287&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fbjhp.12254&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28646537&rft.externalDocID=28646537 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1359-107X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1359-107X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1359-107X&client=summon |